Using Feynman's technique to solve this really cool Berkeley Math Tournament integral

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 7 фев 2025
  • Last time around we solved this integral using some elegant properties of the definite integral:
    • Is this hard integral ...
    Those elegant properties are stated and explained in the link below
    • Some really nice prope...
    This time, however, I couldn't resist solving it using Feynman's technique and really enjoyed solving this particular problem. I hope you enjoy the video too and remember to like and subscribe for more maths and physics content

Комментарии • 29

  • @wowbagger7168
    @wowbagger7168 Год назад +8

    If you are grading your hand writing with an E, I'm giving you an A for presentation.
    And yes, I learned that technique in some lesson at the university, but it was only mentioned with some simple example. Years later I met it again when reading Feynman's "Surely you're joking", but you make a big show out of it. Fascinating and many thanks, your videos are always great bed time stories.

  • @IndKing17
    @IndKing17 2 года назад +10

    Everytime I see this channel I can only see thumbnail of feymann

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  2 года назад +5

      😂😂😂
      It's my favourite technique so I can't help it. Although I have solved this integral using just the basics in a previous video

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  2 года назад +3

      And you might even see some DEs and thumbnails of Newton and Leibniz too 😂

  • @rajneeshmishra6969
    @rajneeshmishra6969 2 года назад +4

    I am falling in love with Feynman's Technique to be honest. Why didn't they teach me that in High School!

  • @mohammedamohamed1885
    @mohammedamohamed1885 11 месяцев назад +2

    Every thing was very pritty but in last step I coyd't understand how to swich the integrals borders from 0-infinity to 0-1
    thanks for all nice videos

    • @txikitofandango
      @txikitofandango 7 месяцев назад

      He wants I(1). He knows I(0). By the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus, I(1) - I(0) = integral from 0 to 1 of I'(a) da. Use this to solve for I(1).

  •  2 года назад +1

    Heaviside cover up method works here with complex and makes way easier the partial fraction decomposition

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  2 года назад +3

      Indeed it does

    •  2 года назад

      @@maths_505 love your videos, btw. Awsome content.

  • @Unknown-u9t9t
    @Unknown-u9t9t Год назад

    How do you know that the Leibinz rule can be applied to a given integral with a parameter? To do this, you first need to determine, if it converges uniformly with respect to the alpha parameter, isn’t it? Please, sorry for my possibly incorrectly formulated sentences in English. I don't know it very well, and I composed these sentences with the help of a translator.

  • @danabaxterfadlerspiios9706
    @danabaxterfadlerspiios9706 Год назад +2

    Can you integrate the Bernoulli integral using the Feynman method?

  • @stenzenneznets
    @stenzenneznets 7 месяцев назад

    Hello! Is there a "simple" function whose integral has a very "complex" closed form? By a simple function, I mean a function similar to the one in the video, consisting of a few elementary functions, at most rational. By a very complex closed form, I mean expressions that involve various constants, raficals, logarithms, sums and multiplications etc. (ellipitc integrals or hylergeometric functions are not allowed, solution must be close). Thanks for any insights!

    • @stenzenneznets
      @stenzenneznets 7 месяцев назад

      Gamma and zeta function are not allowed as solutions. Elementary functions only

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  7 месяцев назад

      That's actually an interesting question

  • @utuberaj60
    @utuberaj60 Год назад

    That's a nice one to solve. But your answer here is + Pi/2 ^ ln(2), but in your other video that you solved using elementary methods (no exotic Feynman technique), the same answer is negative of the above answer. Can you please explain why?

  • @sciencelover-c2j
    @sciencelover-c2j 10 месяцев назад

    Good evening. What is the app you used for solution here?

  • @sainikhilk7851
    @sainikhilk7851 Год назад

    U could have just used "The king's Property" and add both the integrals making it a simpler integration of just cotx.

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Год назад

      Wouldn't work...try it and see for yourself

  • @nasim09021975
    @nasim09021975 Год назад

    I thought perhaps you were to going to write the x in the numerator as atan(a*tan(x)) 🤔

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Год назад +1

      Nah....not elegant enough

  • @thomasblackwell9507
    @thomasblackwell9507 2 года назад

    FAROUT! Sir,your handwriting is not bad; you should see mine. Even my chickens can not read it!

    • @Simio_Da_Tundra
      @Simio_Da_Tundra 2 года назад +3

      i don't think that's your fault though, chickens can't read much tbh

  • @holyshit922
    @holyshit922 2 года назад

    I prefer previous version

  • @krishpandey854
    @krishpandey854 7 месяцев назад

    another method-
    I= integral(xcotx)
    apply by parts to get:
    I=integral(-ln(sinx)) from x=0 to x=pi/2
    Using symmetry:
    I=integral(-ln(cosx)) from x=0 to x=pi/2
    Adding:
    2I=Integral( -ln(sin2x) + ln2) from x=0 to x=pi/2
    =integral(-ln(sin2x)) + pi/2 ln2
    Interestingly: integral(-ln(sin2x)) from x=0 to x=pi/2 is equal to I (can be proved by subsitution u=2x, followed by use of symmetry of sinx about x=pi/2)
    2I=I+pi/2 ln2
    I=pi/2 ln2
    Done

  • @memeboy1057
    @memeboy1057 Год назад +1

    I have an easy solution to this that was pointed out to me by my friend, who solved it in less than a minute after i spent 10 minutes trying to show him the power of Feynman’s technique (🫣)
    Rewrite the integrand as x * cosx/sinx
    Now integrate by parts, differentiate x, integrate cosx/sinx = ln(sinx)
    The integral then becomes,
    I = [ xln(sinx) ]_{0,π/2} - int_{0,π/2} [ ln(sinx) ] dx
    The first term is obviously zero, and the second term (the integral) is just the famous Eular’s integral whose value is -π/2 ln2. So simplyfying,
    I = π/2 * ln2
    Sometimes we get so used to the advanced techniques that our mind misses the simplest of things 🫠🫠🫠

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Год назад +1

      The first video I made on this integral solved it the way you pointed out....the video also involved the proof of Eular's log trig integral using symmetry arguments

    • @memeboy1057
      @memeboy1057 Год назад

      @@maths_505 can you share the link maybe ?

    • @maths_505
      @maths_505  Год назад +1

      ruclips.net/video/iS0rf7SchlM/видео.html