Step 1: Get the existing 777X variants certified and successfully rolled out - Including the freighters. After that, sure - As long as a -10 can be comfortably produced within existing parameters of the 777X. If Boeing needed to go the Max route with multiple alterations and oddities to get a -10 certified as a 777X they're better off not doing it.... Prioritizing a 737 replacement, a new 757/767 replacement, or something else entirely new instead.
We know that the 777x fuselage failed (only just though) during static testing. My understanding is that the stresses on the fuselage increase as it is lengthened. Could this be a problem for Boeing if significant strengthening with its associated weight penalty is necessary?
Boeing actually considered making a -10 but according to them, it doesn't seen to economically make sense. Given that the 787-10 was not a success (yet). What really made me mad was that they said that airlines can use the 777X twice in one route and it will be more efficient than one bigger jet flying to that route. This is BS because Emirate's A380 routes are mostly full so they make a huge profit from that. If they had to use 2 777X-9s, that will mean the airline has to double the staff, fuel, maintenance, and traffic. Emirates can lose money this way.
The fact that no American carrier has ordered the 777-9 indicates the plane being a handful; now, you believe a more extended variant is giving a new life? I don't think so.
And if a B777-10 was developed, it would be just in time to compete with the A350Neo, which we all know is being quietly developed by Airbus and RR for the early 2030s. Imagine the heavy old aluminium airframe of this new 777X, against the super lightweight composite hull of an A350Neo, with its UltraFan inspired engines. I don't think Boeing are that stupid, but hang on a minute............
@@stevesmoneypit6137 The trouble is buddy, no American airline is interested in the B777X, so the first that many Boeing boys in the US will see of their beloved B777X in service (assuming they live long enough), is when Emirates, Lufthansa or BA etc, schedule to their local airport. Let alone actually fly in one. No disrespect, but American citizens are not great international flyers...........
nope. . . but a new hybrid aero propulsion sure will that'll save fuel & fly further . . . something like the Prius plug-in hybrid . . . there are electric powered aircrafts, might as well have hybrid . . .
From what I heard Oldtimers usually get quite a lot of money when traded. Sure, trade volume is low, nevertheless it seems to be like an interesting business model for Boeing.
How about finish and launch the existing 777X before jumping on the next band wagon. Also, make your planes safe and reliable, or just shut down the business now.
@@leng3001 You should try using your brain. You can be a Boeing fan and still realise that Boeing has some serious problems to solve. And you don't have to be a Boeing hater to do that.
Sure. Lets double down on stupid. Cannot get the 9 certified....so lets pile on and make another plane that is the same, just longer. Boeing deserves to go out of business at this point.
@ i disagree on that, while niche there is a market for it, esp the heavy lift sector that are just flying older Antonovs and 747 that are no longer in production. The 2nd deck i admit maybe stretching it, but I believe ultra luxury Gulf airlines or SQ can cater that to ultra 1st class suites like what they’re doing in their A380. And the 777-9 is already a very long plane, its a meter longer than the tail-strike risk that was the A340-600, I believe, and i might be wrong, we’ve reached peak single-deck size for planes.
Jaja no han solucionado los problemas del modelo que por cierto lleva mas de 7 años de retraso y quieren introducir la version 10 del modelo definitivamente se les a ido la cabeza
This is a disaster waiting to happen The max was a disaster after greed trumped safety and engineering. Here we see that serpent again. Boeing is not investing in technology to build aircraft but opting for designing aircraft outside the safe design constraints of technology. Those engines will be soooo expensive for airlines to buy and service that it's going to be economically not viable to operate those types. The undeveloped wing technology will stress the engineering envelope, leaving operators large headaches as cracks for in a grounded fleet. Malfunction of engines will see a very likely more crashes for this failing company on life support. Is there no limit to man's stupidity ? A time when passengers want narrow bodied planes, why publicize a design which is now out of date? Boing needs to demonstrate over the next ten years it can actually build a plane that flies safely, stays in the operator's hands for long enough before it is strapped. Ryan air got its nose broken when it bought some Boeing cheap to find they never arrived or cot soo much in maintenance it might fold the airline. The coming generation of new aircraft will be narrow bodied multi engined hybrid powered aircraft. Goodbye, Boeing, the USA taxpayer cant subsidize this failing company and weak management beyond next year. Looks like the last CEO will be appointed in the coming months before it is broken up and put into receivership. Presumably, Boeing is selling more parts than finished aircraft before its demise.
I have a prediction that ac will order the 777X in the future cuz The most likely successor to the 77WS for ac would be the 777X cuz according to simply flying he’s right search it up
@@frutdafruitUr opinion is good but it’s not true tho. Plus their 777-300ERS are nearing 17 years old most likely they will keep it for a decade they have a Large 450 Seater 77W and the rest 400
@@frutdafruitAir nz has the 777-300ER and etc and some 787s plus they are going to order the 777X in the future cuz Rn They are won’t order it yet They are a member of star alliance just like AC and Air nz ordered 8 787-10s and they’ve delayed for a bit and they are going to get their 2 Boeing 787-10s in the future
Awesome Video Globe Trotting At Dj's Aviation👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂
I can't wait to fly this plane eventually
in the year 2100!
777-8 -9 in 2050
-10 in 2100
okay lol
lol
Total nonsense ,can't get it's 777x certified so how can they even consider anything new,
You would think the original triple 7 retired far too early as the 757 did ✈️
Step 1: Get the existing 777X variants certified and successfully rolled out - Including the freighters. After that, sure - As long as a -10 can be comfortably produced within existing parameters of the 777X. If Boeing needed to go the Max route with multiple alterations and oddities to get a -10 certified as a 777X they're better off not doing it.... Prioritizing a 737 replacement, a new 757/767 replacement, or something else entirely new instead.
We know that the 777x fuselage failed (only just though) during static testing.
My understanding is that the stresses on the fuselage increase as it is lengthened.
Could this be a problem for Boeing if significant strengthening with its associated weight penalty is necessary?
I feel like such a varient would be comically long.
Why would you stop at 10? We want 777-20.
Stop it 😂😂😂😂😂
A 777-10? Yes please
777 with 70m cabin length......impossible
A350 with 65m cabin length......would still be a possibility
You dont onow what you are talking about
Remember the a340-600 exist so... yes they can strecth plane alot
Boeing actually considered making a -10 but according to them, it doesn't seen to economically make sense. Given that the 787-10 was not a success (yet). What really made me mad was that they said that airlines can use the 777X twice in one route and it will be more efficient than one bigger jet flying to that route. This is BS because Emirate's A380 routes are mostly full so they make a huge profit from that. If they had to use 2 777X-9s, that will mean the airline has to double the staff, fuel, maintenance, and traffic. Emirates can lose money this way.
777X fuselage can't be lengthened any further without major increase in wing areas.
The fact that no American carrier has ordered the 777-9 indicates the plane being a handful; now, you believe a more extended variant is giving a new life? I don't think so.
Dual engine aircraft is the current market for airlines there's no denying and there's no debating it ✈️
And if a B777-10 was developed, it would be just in time to compete with the A350Neo, which we all know is being quietly developed by Airbus and RR for the early 2030s. Imagine the heavy old aluminium airframe of this new 777X, against the super lightweight composite hull of an A350Neo, with its UltraFan inspired engines. I don't think Boeing are that stupid, but hang on a minute............
I go aluminum frame any day
@@stevesmoneypit6137
The trouble is buddy, no American airline is interested in the B777X, so the first that many Boeing boys in the US will see of their beloved B777X in service (assuming they live long enough), is when Emirates, Lufthansa or BA etc, schedule to their local airport. Let alone actually fly in one. No disrespect, but American citizens are not great international flyers...........
Thanks again Dj!!
Next vid, Boeing SECRETLY developing 777-20, -30, -40, .... 😂🤣
No kidding....it's your funniest video buddy....Boeing can't build new planes anymore and make money with them...
I heard that Spirit Airlines filed for bankruptcy protection. I wish the best of luck to their employees and customers.
nope. . . but a new hybrid aero propulsion sure will that'll save fuel & fly further . . . something like the Prius plug-in hybrid . . . there are electric powered aircrafts, might as well have hybrid . . .
Once the 9x is out and about, airlines that love large jets may ask for it. I hope it happens.
From what I heard Oldtimers usually get quite a lot of money when traded. Sure, trade volume is low, nevertheless it seems to be like an interesting business model for Boeing.
Not happening any time soon.
There will no be 777-10 but it is possible The 777-9 will be the largest but it will be cool if there’s a 10
Get the 777X certified first before dreaming of a 777X10.
its possible, but it will take like 7 or 8 more years if it does happen
That seems to be a bit of a stretch, pun intended.
Try getting a '9' certified first! Is this a Boeing promo or real aviation news?
777-9ER fully made of Carbon Fiber
"undoubtedly", not "undoubtably" 😂😂😂
How about finish and launch the existing 777X before jumping on the next band wagon. Also, make your planes safe and reliable, or just shut down the business now.
given how badly boeing are messing up the 777-9, 787 and 737 max and starliner projects I have no faith they could get this certified
Boeing hater
@@leng3001 You should try using your brain. You can be a Boeing fan and still realise that Boeing has some serious problems to solve. And you don't have to be a Boeing hater to do that.
@@leng3001 i actually love boeing, I think they have some really great designs but they are suffering from repeatedly short sighted choices
Boeing to fix the 737 & 777x problems first to jump into business vs Airbus.
Sure. Lets double down on stupid. Cannot get the 9 certified....so lets pile on and make another plane that is the same, just longer. Boeing deserves to go out of business at this point.
777-10 EIS hmmm at this rate of the -9 I'd say 2040?
Just built a twin engine 747
that's what the 777X basically is
@ almost is… it doesn’t have a 2nd deck and a (optional) forward door for large cargo.
@ yes, but the second deck isn’t needed, and the forward cargo door is too niche to justify production just for that
@ i disagree on that, while niche there is a market for it, esp the heavy lift sector that are just flying older Antonovs and 747 that are no longer in production.
The 2nd deck i admit maybe stretching it, but I believe ultra luxury Gulf airlines or SQ can cater that to ultra 1st class suites like what they’re doing in their A380. And the 777-9 is already a very long plane, its a meter longer than the tail-strike risk that was the A340-600, I believe, and i might be wrong, we’ve reached peak single-deck size for planes.
the fuselage of a 747sp looks very likely to be refitted with a twin engine
Boeing needs a 777-11 :D lol
No
But it would be cool THE 9 WILL BE THE LARGEST
Jaja no han solucionado los problemas del modelo que por cierto lleva mas de 7 años de retraso y quieren introducir la version 10 del modelo definitivamente se les a ido la cabeza
Don't worry guys... boeing isn't going to build 777-10 for another 7-8 years
LETS talk about Airbus and its A350-2000neo not about Boeing 777-10.
NO HE CAN TALK WHATEVER HE WANTS
That’s a joke
@@leng3001 Yikes someone struck a nerve
Wet dreams of a Boeing fanboi.
They need at least twenty years to come up with something new.
This is a disaster waiting to happen
The max was a disaster after greed trumped safety and engineering. Here we see that serpent again.
Boeing is not investing in technology to build aircraft but opting for designing aircraft outside the safe design constraints of technology.
Those engines will be soooo expensive for airlines to buy and service that it's going to be economically not viable to operate those types.
The undeveloped wing technology will stress the engineering envelope, leaving operators large headaches as cracks for in a grounded fleet. Malfunction of engines will see a very likely more crashes for this failing company on life support. Is there no limit to man's stupidity ?
A time when passengers want narrow bodied planes, why publicize a design which is now out of date?
Boing needs to demonstrate over the next ten years it can actually build a plane that flies safely, stays in the operator's hands for long enough before it is strapped. Ryan air got its nose broken when it bought some Boeing cheap to find they never arrived or cot soo much in maintenance it might fold the airline.
The coming generation of new aircraft will be narrow bodied multi engined hybrid powered aircraft. Goodbye, Boeing, the USA taxpayer cant subsidize this failing company and weak management beyond next year. Looks like the last CEO will be appointed in the coming months before it is broken up and put into receivership.
Presumably, Boeing is selling more parts than finished aircraft before its demise.
777-10😂 going into service in 2035 when it don't loos some parts.
You are optimistic😂
Lost the door like you lost the “e” in lose lol
😂🤣😂🤣😂
2nd comment
10th comment
20th comment😁
Nobody cares I ALWAYS SEE PPL COMMENTING THIS STUPID AHH COMMENT
I have a prediction that ac will order the 777X in the future cuz The most likely successor to the 77WS for ac would be the 777X cuz according to simply flying he’s right search it up
I don't think ACA needs an aircraft this large, I mean they retired their 747s in 2004, 20 years ago.
@@frutdafruitUr opinion is good but it’s not true tho. Plus their 777-300ERS are nearing 17 years old most likely they will keep it for a decade they have a Large 450 Seater 77W and the rest 400
@@frutdafruitand they also never announced HELLO EVERYONE TODAY WE WILL NOT ORDER THE 777X BECAUSE IT IS TOO BIG AND ETC
@@frutdafruitMeta ai said it searched air Canadas news about not ordering the 777X and RUclips videos It said there were no vids and news so it’s true
@@frutdafruitAir nz has the 777-300ER and etc and some 787s plus they are going to order the 777X in the future cuz Rn They are won’t order it yet They are a member of star alliance just like AC and Air nz ordered 8 787-10s and they’ve delayed for a bit and they are going to get their 2 Boeing 787-10s in the future
Awesome Video Globe Trotting At Dj's Aviation👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂🙂