Maximum Likelihood Estimation for the Geometric Distribution

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 21

  • @danielkojoakaachobli2628
    @danielkojoakaachobli2628 Год назад +1

    Thanks Prof. The confusion in my mind in respect of maximum likelihood estimation has now been cleared.

  • @Comrade-wv1lu
    @Comrade-wv1lu 7 месяцев назад

    এই টপিকটা নিয়ে যতটুকু কনফিউশন ছিলো সব দূর করার জন্য অসংখ্য ধব্যবাদ। ভালোবাসা নেবেন।

  • @traj250
    @traj250 2 года назад +2

    Great vid to follow the diff steps. Professor skipped a lot of steps and was confusing (jammed into the end of lecture of course). Thanks for the clear video!

    • @Thergh
      @Thergh Год назад +1

      It's always like that. I hate when they do this, it leads to so much not needed fructration

  • @Thergh
    @Thergh Год назад

    What a great explanation, thank you for making my exams easier!

  • @pauleseme8406
    @pauleseme8406 2 года назад

    Well explained, you have rescued me indeed, thanks

  • @catiat7262
    @catiat7262 2 года назад +4

    Hello, first of all, thank you very much for your videos. I just watched some concerning maximum likelihood estimator and it was very helpful. However, I just came across with an error in this formula. The estimator of p should be 1/x-bar. I think the problem starts with the definition of the pmc.

  • @JohnEvorda
    @JohnEvorda Год назад

    Thank you Prof God bless ...

  • @carylannebeltran
    @carylannebeltran 3 года назад

    Thank you so much! This was so helpful.

  • @Agustinoism
    @Agustinoism 3 года назад

    Thank you so much. Can you do uniform distribution next.

  • @yousif_alyousifi
    @yousif_alyousifi 2 года назад

    Thank you for a great video. May I know which tools you are using for delivering this lesson?

    • @traj250
      @traj250 2 года назад

      looks like one note? or similar to

  • @Blahcub
    @Blahcub Год назад

    This is incorrect because xi in the definition should be xi-1. This means our true answer should be 1/xbar.

    • @johnnysins4870
      @johnnysins4870 9 месяцев назад

      That’s only if x = 1..2..3….. not if x starts at 0 no

    • @Blahcub
      @Blahcub 9 месяцев назад +1

      @@johnnysins4870 why tf johnny sins in a maximum likelihood estimation video lmao

    • @johnnysins4870
      @johnnysins4870 9 месяцев назад

      @@Blahcub Research for new role coming up

  • @sathapornwattana2239
    @sathapornwattana2239 11 месяцев назад

    Thank you( Exp100)

  • @giuliomartini6892
    @giuliomartini6892 3 года назад +3

    This ain't it bruh

    • @natehagen9710
      @natehagen9710 3 года назад

      This might be part of it...

    • @traj250
      @traj250 2 года назад

      might be because how he defined the pmc at the beginning... that's what I think at least

    • @kriszhli
      @kriszhli 2 года назад +2

      This is correct. Most people define n as positive integer but here n can be 0.