rwanda will not be repealed, only sidelined and Suella says Rishi has failed-
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 май 2024
- but it is his fault and he must own it.. Savagery from a person who sees herself as "kingmaker"
🛒 Explore my unique, fun political merch at our new store! Click the link below.
etsy.com/shop/ProfessorTimsCa... !
Join me, Professor Tim Wilson, as I dissect today's headlines, offering my insights and perspectives on the latest in British politics and global affairs. With a keen eye and a bit of wit, we delve into the news that shapes our world.
🔔 Subscribe to our channel to stay up-to-date with my latest reactions and analyses. Join our community of informed viewers who value depth, nuance, and a sprinkle of humour in their news consumption.
🎥 Must-Watch: Explore My Most Popular Video Ever (5.5m+ views) on How To Write A Good Essay: • How to write a good essay
🌍 My Shorts provide concise insights and reactions to keep you informed: / @professortimwilson
This channel serves as your go-to source for thoughtful and sometimes slightly satirical commentary on current events, political shifts, and the stories that matter. From deep dives into the mechanics of the UK government to global political dynamics and everything in between, we cover it all with the aim of enlightening, entertaining, and encouraging informed discussions.
#News #PoliticalCommentary #TalkTV #GBNews #DailyMirror #WorldPolitics #GuidoFawkes #DailyMail #TalkTV
I have complained to the BBC about this, the bias is ridiculous
Why was Suella Braverman given airtime on today's Laura Kuenssberg show, shes no longer in the cabinet, just a backbencher thinking purely for herself and her political career.
Nothing the Conservatives say, front bench or otherwise will stem the tide now. They are on the road to nowhere.
Not only was suella braverman talking rubbish but she was not told that it was rubbish , got to think tories are about to move more right. Hope it means worse outcome for them.
The answer is BBC. Suella is a nasty and dangerous individual. Starmer must be very pleased she's a Sunak hating Tory. Hell hath no fury like a woman scorned.
Well it certainly added a bit of incandescent bile into the proceedings." I supported Rishi because he (probably) promised to bring me back into some sort of "prominence." I'm old enough to remember Senna's , very similar "woe, woe , thrice woe" in Up Pompeii.
I agree user-hh. Laura Keunnsberg set her up as star attraction...but she's a disgraced failure, whose only contribution has been to help add to the mess the country is in with her cruelty, arrogance, racism and deeply ignorant crap. She is now a total nobody on the scene, yet she's STILL given a platform to speak her nonsense. Keunnsberg seems to genuinely believe that she's still relevant...but I suppose her show isn't exactly premium quality in the world of journalism!
We have to remember Braverman's other role; as a propagandist for Netanyahu who is proud that she has family members serving in the IDF and taking part in the Gaza"operation"
Suella Braverman is by far the worst, nastiest politician I have ever witnessed in the 73 years of my very political life. Pritti Patel comes a long way behind her but is still an unsavoury character. Enoch Powell was bad with his "Rivers of Blood" frenzy but Braverman is verging on if not outright FASCIST. A horrible person.
Agree Labour soft pedal too much. They might do even better if they took a firmer postion, and more moral postion, which will bring back more of their left wing voters, who will leave them for the Greens and other left parties. Will be interesting to see their manifesto when it finally comes out?
Yes this isn't the first disappointing row back we have seen. Where are unashamed 'old Labour folk' to go?
Don't take us for granted just because we despise this awful Governnent!!
Madame Defarge...
Tortured soul Sewerella Bashtheman can't get her foot in.
In ten years we'll look back fondly at when dinghy arrivals was _only_ 42,000 a year. This is just the start.
But bear in mind the rest of the million plus arrivals last year came with visas.
@@malcolm8564 zero tolerance, nip in the bud.
Laura Kuenssberg had three Tories on, all with completely different views about the state of their party. Braverman the extremist who wants the party to go even further to the right, Harper the minister in complete denial about the trouble they are in, and Scully who is trying to come across as the most sensible of the three. This division is untenable, the Conservative Party has no one to blame but themselves.
But she was a minister, and a failed one at that.
I'm pretty sure cutting funding to the Rwanda scheme is the same as killing it no? Is it not just that labour don't want to promise to devoted parliamentary time to it when they have better things to do? Honest question. I know a bit about politics but things like this are a bit opaque. Is the time and effort it would take parliament a legitimate reason not to prioritise scraping laws they ain't going to apply?
🤔There'll be so much actual & metaphorical sewage to clean up it'll be difficult for Labour to prioritise 😢
He didn't say that though , he said he couldn't say because he cannot make up policy on the fly.
Labour have said time and again they would repeal the Rwanda scheme and replace it with cross border policing let's hope they make good on that and by the way just like the bus that left on Thursday with no asylum seekers because of public spirited human beings I don't forsee those planes leaving with any either-maybe Rishi Sunak plans to send people in drones!
It doesn't take long for those with little love for Starmer to start sniping and sneering from their fox holes. Not a gracious look but then what can one expect from this sorry bunch. If they are hoping for better results come the postponed GE then they are still not listening or even thinking
Suella thinks she will be PM one day and has to stay relevant. I assume she will lose in her riding, but it depends on who shows up to vote.
Oh my good Lord no.
It's happening again. Same old story in the UK. People actually believe that Labour will make a difference and won't be as bad as the Tories.
It's just going to be the same old bs we've had for decades. Empty promises and slogans.
It cannot even keep the Rwanda promise.
And as long as all parties are anti EU,nothing will improve for decades.How can it?
They made a huge difference to deliver a functioning country last time .
The Tories utterly broke it in 14 years of failure .
Oh Cru. You gained power from the 100 MPs who saved Rishi from Boris' reinstatement; kept Rishi in check with your dreams and obsessions lest you turn the gammon class against him, and now dance on the Tory grave with your heel on his neck.
Unless it is simply a matter of time, it is difficult to see the rationale for not repealing it. On the other hand, there is so much of the Tories’ handiwork which needs to be undone, that it might only make sense to repeal it when it can’t simply be ignored. Otherwise Labour is going to have little time left for its own legislation.
The point is there is no point rooting for the Labour Party which a lot of people are doing gleefully, without realising what either the Labour Party or those rooting for, … would do or want respectively… just to see the Conservative Party defeated in the upcoming General Election … even if it’s the Conservative Party who is now actually doing good …
The problem is that they have such a huge amount of things to do, things need to be prioritised as there isn’t enough parliamentary time to do everything.
If they can just not do the Rwanda stuff but its still legislation for now, then that seems a good compromise and can be dealt with later, I get means Labour can then prioritise NHS and other stuff first.
What's the Indian God that destroys? That's Braverman with a mix of the Greek Cassandra. This is why Starmer won't drive down any motorways, he can't make any Uturns.
In the last decade, Labour have missed no opportunities to disappoint me. The trend continues. The only thing in their favour nowadays is that they're not the Tories. If we had PR, I would vote for The Green Party. As it is, I will have to support Labour to be sure of getting rid of my robotic Tory MP.
Which is why Starmer supports FPTP.
You Tim, and other RUclipsr I watch have watched Cruella+Kuenssberg and selected the "best bits" so we don't have to. It would be interesting to find out how many bothered to watch these two irrelevances directly on the BBC. This interview was so self indulgent and cringey.
I think you’re being a bit too harsh as I have said before wait and let them get into power “ If the do manage to “and see to what extent the mess the tories have created you have seen what happens when they declare some of their policies the tories have stolen them, I believe they will do well for the future
Can Cruella Braverman be taken seriously when she says that Starmer has the charisma of a peanut, she voted for Liz Truss who has the charisma of Lettuce ?
Hey now come on, that lettuce had far more charisma than Truss!
I heard somewhere that repealing a law takes ages so trying to get rid of all the egregious stuff the tories have done in the last 14 years would take up too much parliamentary time when Labour will have so much else to do. I'm hoping that's the case and that it's not yet another u-turn from the heinous Starmer
It’s because so much harm has been done to the UK by the Tories in fourteen years, that the country is in its present state. The first step to repairing the damage is to get rid of bad laws, bad regulations and vindictive practices. Else what has happened could be repeated, with this additional detail: that such laws and rules did harm, but the government of the day chose not to remove them.
Heinous ? Lol. Anything but.
tories telling the truth no way.
😢the same mark Harper who was sunak campaign manager to get sunak the prime minister job and who said just because we said we will do it doesn't mean we will only when funding comes available and the taxpayers money spent on the tricky Ricky gave to remove 1,so far half a billion pounds and that was a volunteer who took 3,ooo pounds and a first class ticket for a holiday any media gone out to see how he doing yet sat in the hotel
Yes, he absconded, nowhere to be found.
For the few Tories hat will be left after the election, the issue will be the same as it is now - Do they go further to the right and lose their moderate supporter, or go further to the left and lose the swivel eyed loons . . .
Prof....I find your language really quite peculiar sometimes. You call many Tory ghouls by just their first name (really inappropriately in my humble opinion), but you directly refer to Pat McFadden by just his second name. Are you aware of this? Are you saying this deliberately? I find it very strange...and I regard you as very articulate. Just a wee observation.