May seem that way but it's something police do 1000's of times a week , More concerning is the new search laws that have just gone through parliament, police no longer need a warrant to search a property if they have suspicion This will definitely be abused
That’s my thinking and I’m actually scared to even go out in public because if I’m ever a victim I’ve seen from these videos the police always blame the victim against the illegals
I was in a pub with my daughter and drunken yob came in and was harassing my daughter , I asked him just to leave us alone and some people that new him escorted him away from us then he came back to the table we were sitting at and picked up a chair and had it over his head to hit me , the same people grabbed him a took him to the other end of the pub , I phoned the police and told them what was happening , it took them 40 minutes !!! to arrive , they took him out sde to the police car , my daughter and I left the pub as we felt safe knowing thr police had him outside , I asked the police if they were going to arrest him ? They said no , we have ordered him a taxi , I said a taxi ? To where ? the police said to another pub . Wih that the taxi pulled up and the drunken yob went to cause trouble in another pub and the police just drove off
well, if section 33 is bollocks then perhaps the government who made it up can remove it since you claim it is bollocks, would that suit you Mr Policeman?@@andytownsend8447
They seem to have a lot of clout fingers in many pies!" On world so called security? And appear good at helping accommodate new destitute arrivals quickly into accommodation 🤔
You talk too much. You are filling in the blanks for these cops. You are not required to help them in any way. Carry on doing that and one day you will talk yourself into arrest.
@@paulammon2281 An implied right of access requires not only an ‘open gate’ but also a valid reason to enter the premises eg to gain access to reception in a prescribed or direct manor. It does not give right of access to enter private car parks, gardens or service yards and to look into windows
Serco making hundreds of Millions of Pounds from their Government contracts to provide accommodation and security for illegal migrants. Absolute disgrace.
The police officer illegally survielled you and didn't tell you he was recording you, against policy and opens himself and the police force to a very large claim.
If people really wanted to gain inside information from that place they would infiltrate from an employment perspective etc. This is becoming crazier by the day.
You explained to much for two long mate. I know its easy to say from my sofa 🛋 but if your going to do this you need to be stronger. Plus don't apologise to the cop that was going use Section 43 on you 😮 take the Unlawful Search and then put in a civil claim😮.
It's clear that Serco have a higher profile with police than the average UK Citizen. Subject to any editing time that took all of a few short minutes from the phone call to the Police arrival swarm. Not quite as quick as a response to allegations a Copper has been called "Lesbian Nanna" but still an exceptional response time over the assistance an ordinary citizen would get.
I worked in a secure enviroment and we had frosted windows .. its the data owner who is responsible for protecting the data not the public or the police
Serco is a private contractor that the UK government has contracts with, Serco is not the government, but they do have very sensitive information that is not for public knowledge. If you are filming into windows on or from a public area, you are not breaking any laws. But the sign on the gate is very clear, 'no unauthorised access', it doesn't matter that the gate was open, you can not access that area without authorisation. They were in the right to detain you using the Terrorism Act and once seeing you were not a threat, they let you go. They did not over react, you may know you're innocent, but Serco and the police do not. In this instant, you were in the wrong and accessed private property and peered through windows with a company that has military contracts with the government.
I cannot believe that they came out that quick and said they heard an altercation while on phone, when yesterday (Essex one) they didn't give a crap !!! They defo heard altercation on the phone!
@@Noseypoke-mr7th have respect for our emergency services, all emergency services wear them as a mark of respect, it has nothing to do with what happens to the general public
Not in GB but certainly is in NI UK, you would be looking at jail time in NI for entering that place and/or not giving details, not that I agree with it, just saying.
That is illegal in my neck of the woods (NI)where all cops are armed, makes me wonder how they get away with it in GB where the cops are arresting people for wearing masks. I doubt it very much if the plod can hide their faces.@@DJEMEDIA
You failed her big time. Armed or not walk away or defend yourself. You just showed them the video. Never say yes to the police when they say can you understand as it its almost an admitance of guilt and that you are doing wrong. If there was senstivie data its not your issue its Serco's issue to keep it safe. Never appologies to the police as again you are then seen as admitting guilt.
With respect, you're not an auditor and shouldn't refer to yourself as that. Auditing is exercising your rights and not pandering to false authority. You give up way too much information
Cops were a bit keen to go straight to a search but they redeemed themselves by actually investigating and listening for a change. I’m actually pleasantly shocked.
This is actualy the fist time i have seen a cop redy to serch, reving up to serch, letting of and dont poceed with the serch. Amaising handling on your part. You realy have a gift for de escalating situations.
12:10 It is not a protected building. It is not entitled to extra police protection. It is just a normal office building. A protected property is something more like the houses of parliament, nuclear power stations, MI5 and other top national security sites. The cop is telling a lie to give a excuse to unlawfully use section 43.
I had to double check the date of upload on this when Section 43 was mentioned. To my surprise, it's very recent, I guess they're still not learning. NPCC needs to send that memo around again with a "FUCKING LISTEN THIS TIME" heading on it.
Oh the irony, at all the Serco ruined hotels the security are usually on people in packs within seconds but yet the Serco building itself had security with the relevancy of Huey, Dewey and Lewey.
I've stated this in a number of police interactions I was burgled 2 months ago my house so quite serious no police attended. When I tried to make a service complaint I was told they were really under staffed. Why is it 4 police attended here??????
WHATS MORE SHOCKING AND SICKENING WAS THE FIRST 2 COPS WERE ARMED. I suppose they were just lucky they just happened to be in the area at the time. Yes my arse it was pure luck. @@destinyd4320
2 cars 4 armed goons for a corporation, ZERO response for burglary assault drug dealing etc. good job you didn’t film a McDonald’s or Burger King they’d of sent 20 goons
Can't believe you didn't say anything about them recording without saying! And you folded and told them way to much! Please stand up for photography not fold and give them every bit of information
They might have come across all pally pally but they went straight to S.43 without even conducting an investigation. It's only due to you quickly articulating your motives and de-escalating the situation. With someone else they would have been cuffed up and violated. How is it the police are not wise to what this is, it's been going on for years. No excuse.
My friends workmates father was stabbed and slashed yesterday in Stirchley, Birmingham as he dropped his son off to work. It was all on dash cam including the registration number of the attacker. The son came running into work shouting to call the police and an ambulance. The police NEVER turned up! The elderly victim was taken to hospital and the police NEVER turned up there either. No evidence collected, no road closed to collect samples etc and the elderly man had a big slice of skin taken off his head! We are left wondering if the attacker was a police officer and that is why the cops never came or possibly there was a man with a camera somewhere nearby and half the station were attending that incident. It is an absolute outrage!
Once the Police Officer appeared to be happy with what had happened, why was it necessary for 4 Officers to remain at the Scene? I suspect that it was a way that they could avoid being given another job to deal with. Best way that a Police Officer can avoid work, is to involve themselves in a job that another Officer will have to deal with further, but avoiud getting a job that they will have to deal with themselves. G.
No wonder english police have such an appaling crime clear up rates in single figuires, not for lack of officers, but due to poor allocation of police time, investigating LEGAL actions...
You’d have thought that if the site was so sensitive, they’d be better at protecting their information! Both Police and Serco need to be taken to task over this!!
Now this is what I don't mind, SERCO are a crap company, it's just those douchebags who turn up to private companies harassing them, but SERCO and government contractors like G4S also need to be held accountable and the government needs to stop outsourcing work to them. Mind you if you turn up on your own, they all come out and bully, in a group, they behave.
Quick reaction from police for Serco for 2 muppets in a tracksuit , Who is the major share holder of SERCO ?????? My local businesses with the same complaint would get so much attention, Ask yourself why ?????????
Oh dear oh dear they really have no idea how much trouble they could be in for using 43 and ffs I can’t stand it when they say “YOUVE GOT TO UNDERSTAND” p off ya div.
9:50 They are private cars and the owners don't want them filmed. So how are they going to make sure their car isn't filmed when they're driving on the road. Or do they just keep the car in the carpark all the time.
But Serco site compliance officer is still responsible for not having mirror foiled windows if they admit sensitive material onsite. Hopefully the ICo do a random site visit todo a data audit
Is this Belvedere. it has been done a couple of times I believe. The staff know what you were up to but still called the cops. AB was assaulted here by staff. "Serco went Berserko" was the video.
My house got Burgled and i did not see a Police Officer for 2 days, and here you have 4 Officers including 2 FA Officers, for someone filming on a Public area , i had criminals in my house and i didn’t even get a Police officer for 2 days , go figure🤔
11:25 Why does the cop think that you have to be working for someone to be using a camera. And the point DJE says that he's doing a RUclips video is the moment the police's reasoning for using section 43 falls apart.
I'm going to change my name to "Serco" so that when our farm machinery gets stolen for the umpteenth time, maybe, just maybe, I might actually see a police officer rather than just be given a crime number and told to claim on my now-unaffordable insurance.
My friends workmates father was stabbed and slashed yesterday in Stirchley, Birmingham as he dropped his son off to work. It was all on dash cam including the registration number of the attacker. The son came running into work shouting to call the police and an ambulance. The police NEVER turned up! The elderly victim was taken to hospital and the police NEVER turned up there either. No evidence collected, no road closed to collect samples etc and the elderly man had a big slice of skin taken off his head! We are left wondering if the attacker was a police officer and that is why the cops never came or possibly there was a man with a camera somewhere nearby and half the station were attending that incident. It is an absolute outrage!
All this time whilst the officers were interrogating you, a heist was taking place. You can see the culprit making good his escape at 20:36. Officers were oblivious 🤣🤣
4 police plus 2 cars strange how they seem to find police officers when they want to but when 4 youths were wrecking my car I got a incident number 3 days later but no police attended
Abuse of terrorism act. Definitely a compensation claim there.
Yeah deffo, literally zero potential of terror right from the off. Abuse
Unlikely as they only spoke with him despite initially stating detainment no search was undertaken
May seem that way but it's something police do 1000's of times a week ,
More concerning is the new search laws that have just gone through parliament, police no longer need a warrant to search a property if they have suspicion
This will definitely be abused
The 2 officers have put their jobs in jeopardy.More money for illegal detainment.
How long before section 43 goes the same way as section 44.
More money for illegal detainment that doesn't come from the officers pocket. Untouchable. They are immune to any reprimand.
As far as I can tell, the majority of "terrorists" work in Government and Security Services positions.
They can detain him if they want he went into a private property recording
It's a scam law.
@@Dollarg11111 Immediately he walks straight past a "No unauthorised access" sign.
As a retired officer am amazed these officers cover their faces and they are allowed to do so .Once again we see the misuse of section 43.
Ok now the coppers are covering their faces 😳
Probably armed response. Not just reserved for the SAS anymore.
Why did they have their faces masked
@@beverley5mintricksdavis695 To make their kin proud of them?
Armed cops do cover half of face when on video. It happened last time.
@@DaleSteel clearly they werw
Serco need to be held to account for there lack of security. Well done for reporting there failings
@@agentsuperdave2191 thank you for the grammar lesson. There you are
@@agentsuperdave2191
Oh deer ar wea won of theose theat haz two pik up on tye knee mizztakes. Izzunt it sadd
@@davidharwood9552suffers cretinitus
@@agentsuperdave2191 I do that a lot..mostly caused by predictive text and me not paying attention to it.
So the Rozzers cover their face now…. That can’t be right under any circumstances. Despicable behaviour…..
Armed cops do usually on video
Coz they’re ashamed.
Well the police turn up yet again ,try getting em to turn up when a real crime is being committed.
This is what makes me scared!
why is everything to do with these illegals so heavily guarded?!? it's worrying
That’s my thinking and I’m actually scared to even go out in public because if I’m ever a victim I’ve seen from these videos the police always blame the victim against the illegals
In Case They Escape into The Community
Detained under section 43 for filming???... The world has gone mad, I'll bet the "foreign citizens" wouldn't get detained though 😞
They have getaway bikes 🙄🏴
@@howardelder4411 LOL 😆
Those cops did not identify themselves, nor did they inform you that they are filming you .
This place needs a mass audit get all the regs going in and out
I was in a pub with my daughter and drunken yob came in and was harassing my daughter , I asked him just to leave us alone and some people that new him escorted him away from us then he came back to the table we were sitting at and picked up a chair and had it over his head to hit me , the same people grabbed him a took him to the other end of the pub , I phoned the police and told them what was happening , it took them 40 minutes !!! to arrive , they took him out sde to the police car , my daughter and I left the pub as we felt safe knowing thr police had him outside , I asked the police if they were going to arrest him ? They said no , we have ordered him a taxi , I said a taxi ? To where ? the police said to another pub . Wih that the taxi pulled up and the drunken yob went to cause trouble in another pub and the police just drove off
disgracefull 😕
That's bloody crazy, but it really doesn't surprise me - how do they expect us to feel any trust, never mind protection
Not the old section 43 excuse again, if these clowns continue to abuse section 43 they will loose that power as well.
well, if section 33 is bollocks then perhaps the government who made it up can remove it since you claim it is bollocks, would that suit you Mr Policeman?@@andytownsend8447
Why are the Police so insecure they feel the need to hide their faces...
probably a free palestine marcher.
Observing Serco, the service company of the state, will always attract a quick response.
They seem to have a lot of clout fingers in many pies!" On world so called security? And appear good at helping accommodate new destitute arrivals quickly into accommodation 🤔
And they say there's a shortage of policemen. What a joke.
You talk too much. You are filling in the blanks for these cops. You are not required to help them in any way. Carry on doing that and one day you will talk yourself into arrest.
You can climb a war memorial and walk away though??? it'all gone Pete Tong.
If its publicly assessable you can film whatever you want from the outside. The onus is on them to have any sensitive data on show.
Assessable ?
In what way is a big sign on the gate stating "No unauthorised access" publicly accessible?
An unsecured or open gate is an implied right of access.
It isn't hard to comprehend people.
@@paulammon2281 That would be true if there weren't a sign literally saying "No unauthorised access." The sign removes any implied right
@@paulammon2281 An implied right of access requires not only an ‘open gate’ but also a valid reason to enter the premises eg to gain access to reception in a prescribed or direct manor. It does not give right of access to enter private car parks, gardens or service yards and to look into windows
when they put on the latex gloves i thought it was going to be a prostate examine
🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂PMSL
And The Vasaline.
Amazing how they jump to protect Serco........who's the boss of Serco?
Serco making hundreds of Millions of Pounds from their Government contracts to provide accommodation and security for illegal migrants. Absolute disgrace.
Winston Churchil's grandson...says it all
@@whizzpop1983 illuminati anyone?
Also "ponce" William, the rothschild.
Prince William is the owner, passed on from Charlie Windsors.
Why did you show the police willingly? Disservice to the community
The police officer illegally survielled you and didn't tell you he was recording you, against policy and opens himself and the police force to a very large claim.
not even. barely an advisory & certainly not a reprimand.
It's not illegal. Do you intentionally just make stuff up or is it accidental?
“You’ve GOT to understand.” They need immediate retraining at the very least.
If people really wanted to gain inside information from that place they would infiltrate from an employment perspective etc. This is becoming crazier by the day.
Or just buy all the information files they want from the web , without leaving their own home
You explained to much for two long mate. I know its easy to say from my sofa 🛋 but if your going to do this you need to be stronger. Plus don't apologise to the cop that was going use Section 43 on you 😮 take the Unlawful Search and then put in a civil claim😮.
Not your thing this mate, pack in, do something else.
It's clear that Serco have a higher profile with police than the average UK Citizen. Subject to any editing time that took all of a few short minutes from the phone call to the Police arrival swarm. Not quite as quick as a response to allegations a Copper has been called "Lesbian Nanna" but still an exceptional response time over the assistance an ordinary citizen would get.
You get quicker responses if you 'misgender' someone than an actual crime occurring 😂
I worked in a secure enviroment and we had frosted windows .. its the data owner who is responsible for protecting the data not the public or the police
It's the data handler responsible for protecting it, but it's the company that's liable 🐴
Serco is a private contractor that the UK government has contracts with, Serco is not the government, but they do have very sensitive information that is not for public knowledge. If you are filming into windows on or from a public area, you are not breaking any laws. But the sign on the gate is very clear, 'no unauthorised access', it doesn't matter that the gate was open, you can not access that area without authorisation. They were in the right to detain you using the Terrorism Act and once seeing you were not a threat, they let you go. They did not over react, you may know you're innocent, but Serco and the police do not. In this instant, you were in the wrong and accessed private property and peered through windows with a company that has military contracts with the government.
I cannot believe that they came out that quick and said they heard an altercation while on phone, when yesterday (Essex one) they didn't give a crap !!! They defo heard altercation on the phone!
Our police are so lovely ain’t they shame they got no common sense = and still wearing the defaced Union Jack = bad scene that
It’s not a defaced Union Jack it’s a mark of respect for fallen colleagues all emergency services have them
@@3469jacko Strange that more of the public have died in police custody than policemen on duty??
@@Noseypoke-mr7th have respect for our emergency services, all emergency services wear them as a mark of respect, it has nothing to do with what happens to the general public
You would of thought Serco would be in favour of freedom of movement.
Abuse of Section 43 isn't abuse of Section 43. They always intended to abuse it. It's just POWER.
Still not a Terror offence
Not in GB but certainly is in NI UK, you would be looking at jail time in NI for entering that place and/or not giving details, not that I agree with it, just saying.
Why are the police masked up
Protect identity on camera when armed.
That is illegal in my neck of the woods (NI)where all cops are armed, makes me wonder how they get away with it in GB where the cops are arresting people for wearing masks. I doubt it very much if the plod can hide their faces.@@DJEMEDIA
You failed her big time. Armed or not walk away or defend yourself. You just showed them the video. Never say yes to the police when they say can you understand as it its almost an admitance of guilt and that you are doing wrong.
If there was senstivie data its not your issue its Serco's issue to keep it safe.
Never appologies to the police as again you are then seen as admitting guilt.
Let's not mince words, he doesn't have the backbone for it.
Detained under sec 43, and then admitted that they didn't know anything about you, ie had no prior information. Therefore illegal detainment.
With respect, you're not an auditor and shouldn't refer to yourself as that. Auditing is exercising your rights and not pandering to false authority. You give up way too much information
And then the tyrants turned up
Why do them so called police need to hide there faces is beyond me
Because they’re playing at being SAS!
they were supposed to be armed police so they can shoot some body carrying a camera and get away with it.
So Serco basically admitted to a potential data breach and as usual the whistleblower gets the blame.
Exactly that. Leaves no faith in being honest or helping
Why the masks 😂😂😂
I know they do security contracts for the hotels, but what else do they do. 🤔
Hospitals, Supermarkets, Petrol Stations.
Hmrc & other gvt buildings.
They have been doing defence contracts for thirty years at least chum,as well as lots of other things. It was a mate who served told me in the 1990s !
Private prisons until the government decided unfit for purpose.
They transport prisoners too.
@@destinyd4320 How do you know that ? Reported 😂
Cops were a bit keen to go straight to a search but they redeemed themselves by actually investigating and listening for a change. I’m actually pleasantly shocked.
“ Private property “. You were asked to leave and you left. Nothing to do with OB 🐷🐷 🤷♂️. OBVIOUSLY 🤦♂️
Why are they covering their faces?
You do realise they probably had four brain cells each! 🤣😂🤣
Ive lost a lot of respect for you selling out
This is actualy the fist time i have seen a cop redy to serch, reving up to serch, letting of and dont poceed with the serch. Amaising handling on your part. You realy have a gift for de escalating situations.
And some Granny is getting Mugged, while there wasting time for, serco....😢. Anything but an easy life...😢
Phone the police when your house gets robbed ,see what happens
The second plod is wearing a thin blue line flag.
12:10 It is not a protected building. It is not entitled to extra police protection. It is just a normal office building. A protected property is something more like the houses of parliament, nuclear power stations, MI5 and other top national security sites. The cop is telling a lie to give a excuse to unlawfully use section 43.
Dj demonstrates a real skill in remaining upbeat, civil and likeable, particularly to the police.
I had to double check the date of upload on this when Section 43 was mentioned. To my surprise, it's very recent, I guess they're still not learning. NPCC needs to send that memo around again with a "FUCKING LISTEN THIS TIME" heading on it.
Oh the irony, at all the Serco ruined hotels the security are usually on people in packs within seconds but yet the Serco building itself had security with the relevancy of Huey, Dewey and Lewey.
I've stated this in a number of police interactions I was burgled 2 months ago my house so quite serious no police attended. When I tried to make a service complaint I was told they were really under staffed. Why is it 4 police attended here??????
Yes that's shocking & sickening.
NOT JUST 4 COPS THE FIRST 2 WERE ARMED COPS HENCE COVERING THEIR FACES.
WHATS MORE SHOCKING AND SICKENING WAS THE FIRST 2 COPS WERE ARMED. I suppose they were just lucky they just happened to be in the area at the time. Yes my arse it was pure luck. @@destinyd4320
2 cars 4 armed goons for a corporation, ZERO response for burglary assault drug dealing etc. good job you didn’t film a McDonald’s or Burger King they’d of sent 20 goons
A terror offence?
Armed cops are everywhere these days not doing anything just driving about lol
Can’t coppers complete one sentence without saying ‘Obviously’ every few seconds ?
Can't believe you didn't say anything about them recording without saying! And you folded and told them way to much! Please stand up for photography not fold and give them every bit of information
Section 43 is just going to make people hate cops even more 😮
They might have come across all pally pally but they went straight to S.43 without even conducting an investigation. It's only due to you quickly articulating your motives and de-escalating the situation. With someone else they would have been cuffed up and violated. How is it the police are not wise to what this is, it's been going on for years. No excuse.
What grounds does he have to suspect terrorism ???
He was seen looking in a window , is that really enough grounds for a terrorism search???
My friends workmates father was stabbed and slashed yesterday in Stirchley, Birmingham as he dropped his son off to work. It was all on dash cam including the registration number of the attacker. The son came running into work shouting to call the police and an ambulance. The police NEVER turned up! The elderly victim was taken to hospital and the police NEVER turned up there either. No evidence collected, no road closed to collect samples etc and the elderly man had a big slice of skin taken off his head! We are left wondering if the attacker was a police officer and that is why the cops never came or possibly there was a man with a camera somewhere nearby and half the station were attending that incident. It is an absolute outrage!
Serco robing us all.
Another hefty compensation payout for the detainment. They will struggle in court to justify their reasons for the arrest.
Once the Police Officer appeared to be happy with what had happened, why was it necessary for 4 Officers to remain at the Scene? I suspect that it was a way that they could avoid being given another job to deal with. Best way that a Police Officer can avoid work, is to involve themselves in a job that another Officer will have to deal with further, but avoiud getting a job that they will have to deal with themselves. G.
At 25 00 mins in , did that fully Armd cop say, he was nervous of cameras, twxt, he needs a I.Q test.
Did he
it bloody sounded like it , scared of the people filming ,, ;What. but great vid.
@@DJEMEDIA
DJ scared of the real police. You didnt commit a crime and you rolled over and blagged it instead of standing up for the whole movement you represent
Yeah he is a bit AB lite.
Reading this comment before the police arrive 😂
Might have found a genuine auditor, someone who doesn't attempt to get reactions in negative ways, so props to you 👏
No wonder english police have such an appaling crime clear up rates in single figuires, not for lack of officers, but due to poor allocation of police time, investigating LEGAL actions...
"I'm just doing a video on Serco" DJ says emerging from the bushes 😂 I thought that was so funny. 😅 I better continue to watch the rest of the video 👍
Oh I was by the window checking data breaches ready to point out.
@@DJEMEDIA Yes I know you were. It was funny hearing the rustle of the bushes when you walked out. 😉😁
You’d have thought that if the site was so sensitive, they’d be better at protecting their information! Both Police and Serco need to be taken to task over this!!
The same police force who are using facial recognition software and the copper feels uncomfortable with been on camera.
Mate, you need to be filming the faces, we don’t want to look at their chests, don’t be scared, your allowed to,
Now this is what I don't mind, SERCO are a crap company, it's just those douchebags who turn up to private companies harassing them, but SERCO and government contractors like G4S also need to be held accountable and the government needs to stop outsourcing work to them. Mind you if you turn up on your own, they all come out and bully, in a group, they behave.
Quick reaction from police for Serco for 2 muppets in a tracksuit , Who is the major share holder of SERCO ?????? My local businesses with the same complaint would get so much attention, Ask yourself why ?????????
Oh dear oh dear they really have no idea how much trouble they could be in for using 43 and ffs I can’t stand it when they say “YOUVE GOT TO UNDERSTAND” p off ya div.
Missuse of terrorism act
9:50 They are private cars and the owners don't want them filmed. So how are they going to make sure their car isn't filmed when they're driving on the road. Or do they just keep the car in the carpark all the time.
How on earth do they solve real crime? When you had to explain the circumstances multiple times!
Overkill.
you gave them way too much info and you were very nervous and intimidated
your voice shaking all over the place and talking so quick = anxiety
Way too much info. Failed
But Serco site compliance officer is still responsible for not having mirror foiled windows if they admit sensitive material onsite. Hopefully the ICo do a random site visit todo a data audit
Unaccountable, something very wrong here
You give the police to much information
Way too much!
Loves flapping his gums this guy!
@@guckfoogle1096 1000%
Are you still being detained? Because I didn’t hear him un-detain you… 😂
Is this Belvedere. it has been done a couple of times I believe. The staff know what you were up to but still called the cops. AB was assaulted here by staff. "Serco went Berserko" was the video.
My house got Burgled and i did not see a Police Officer for 2 days, and here you have 4 Officers including 2 FA Officers, for someone filming on a Public area , i had criminals in my house and i didn’t even get a Police officer for 2 days , go figure🤔
Being detained cos Serco breached DPA??? Next time Barbara forgets to lock her computer at work I'm going to call the police.
11:25 Why does the cop think that you have to be working for someone to be using a camera. And the point DJE says that he's doing a RUclips video is the moment the police's reasoning for using section 43 falls apart.
I'm going to change my name to "Serco" so that when our farm machinery gets stolen for the umpteenth time, maybe, just maybe, I might actually see a police officer rather than just be given a crime number and told to claim on my now-unaffordable insurance.
Even Jacques Mesrine never attracted this much police attention. 🚔🇨🇵🚔
Call them for a real crime they won’t turn up, pathetic.
There making a trumpet out of a police whistle = the gates were open he did nothing really = what a laugh
Clever copper covers his face once he’s already been filmed 😂 not very bright are they
great band.
I wish the Corporate policy Enforcement officers came out as quick when a member of the public is in need.
Glad to know our corporations are protected
My friends workmates father was stabbed and slashed yesterday in Stirchley, Birmingham as he dropped his son off to work. It was all on dash cam including the registration number of the attacker. The son came running into work shouting to call the police and an ambulance. The police NEVER turned up! The elderly victim was taken to hospital and the police NEVER turned up there either. No evidence collected, no road closed to collect samples etc and the elderly man had a big slice of skin taken off his head! We are left wondering if the attacker was a police officer and that is why the cops never came or possibly there was a man with a camera somewhere nearby and half the station were attending that incident. It is an absolute outrage!
All this time whilst the officers were interrogating you, a heist was taking place. You can see the culprit making good his escape at 20:36. Officers were oblivious 🤣🤣
4 police plus 2 cars strange how they seem to find police officers when they want to but when 4 youths were wrecking my car I got a incident number 3 days later but no police attended
They think all the members of the public are dale cregans. So dare not attend real crime. Only look after themselves and their masters