I assume that ever since 9/11 happened then airport incidents are treated with extra security provisions and I'm totally fine with that. Theoretically speaking back in the year 2001, any one of Osama Bin Laden's associates could have been just a man with camera.
That's a lie to start , in a previous video a cop lies about seeing him go into a building when he just looks through the open door . Never trust the thin blue line gang
You would think at her age she would have more comnmon sense and at least a very basic knowlege of the law. The driver of red Citroen LJ14 PYP broke the law by driving while operating a mobile phone/ even as a camera CU80 Offence 6 Penalty points. A real shame the bully boys aren't arresting criminals rather than harassing the public.
@@createbelief8678 "a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems." The lady got in a state of disorder due to the controlling system that allows us lawfully to flex our rights . Captain obvious at your service ..press the little bell to request attention .
29:10 It might sound like you have to give details to an airport cop whenever he asks for it, no matter if there is no law or bylaw broken. However it would mean that the airport police have more powers than every other cop in the country. When in reality airport police are at the bottom of the pile. Its worth noting that it is in section 10 which is all about accidents, so the giving of name and address in relation to an accident would be reasonable. To give it for no reason other than a cop asking for it is not reasonable. It would mean that a cop could get a woman's name and address and not be punished for it. Totally unreasonable. Also worth noting that article 8 stands so a law has to be broken before details can be given.
You know there's a big 'except...' in Article 8 though. Is works in the same way as GDPR/DPA - there's a ton of exemptions where policing/security are involved.
This was an amazing vid...DJE, you showed the boys in blue huge respect...When you needed them, they were there for you when those car dealer thugs were chasing you. Awesome vid mate.
They repeatedly said "You are liable for arrest" that does not mean, "You will be arrested" I would chance it, for the opportunity to speak to a lawyer. Then you answered all their fishing questions !
Basic rule. There is no right to privacy in a public place. These security guards need to mimd their own business and stop obstructing pilots from enjoying their civil liberties
You done the right thing regarding giving your details it begs to differ whether its correct but i would trust them untill educated on the matter and im sure you will for future reference. As you said prevents you from losing your equipment for the second time . Love your work very educational great work you do keep it up m8 love from Scotland
Pretty sure you need the land owners permission to film from a private road. The fact that is is publicly accessible only gives you the right to transit the road, not film from it. The publicly accessible part means you can be trespassed from it if the land owner so wished to do so through a civil court. If you take your drone off from that land without the express permission of the land owner you are committing an offence. I'm not sure why you continue to film these contested sites, why not just stick to public land, there are still loads of places where you can make informative, entertaining videos without getting into muddy waters.
There was NO drone at Gatwick.... Until the police started putting their drones up. Then more reports of drones started coming in. So the police kept putting their drones up to find the drones that were being reported. And then their was more reports of drones being up. The reports only stopped when the police grounded their drones. They spent £800,000 on the investigation. _"No culprit or evidence of drones was found"_
It was from December 2018, after reports by a pilot and ground staff of suspected sightings of a drone around the flightpath of Gatwick airport. No drone was found after investigations, but there was disruption to flights and a closure for over a day.
@@DesertRat63 And subsiquently, not one shred of evidence has ever been presented that there was in fact a drone present. Even Sussex Police admitted "there may not have been a drone".
Great video, everyone brilliantly handled. These police operate at such a high level they know what they're doing, and they don't have to swing their egos about. Quite refreshing in fact.
If they can't abuse their powers and step on people's rights while conducting lawful activities, they just aren't enjoying their jobs these days, are they?
It's fascinating to me the different dynamics between law enforcement interactions in the United States and Great Britain. Over hear our cops would bully, threaten, lie, intimidate and give unnecessary directives. Over there your officers are courteous, polite and cordial. No bullies of intimidation at all.
That access road is part of the airport. The detention centre is not. He is standing on the access road. Look at page 153/154 of the gatwick master plan 2019
@@WhiteDieselShedHe knew he was on the airport land, he even says so. It was confirmed when he was told he had passed the signs saying he was and access for authorised user only..
No details are required unless an articulable crime has been committed for which they require proof. Their suspicion that a crime might have been committed is not proof and they have no right to demand your details, or to threaten you with arrest unless you provide them whilst they ascertain if a crime has been committed.
From a legal perspective you need to get the police to issue you 'the threat of arrest' before you hand over details. Get them to verbalize it so if you find that they didn't have the authority to demand details, you have a viable claim.
I hear that DJE has gone into hiding, but not from the thugs at Fort used car sales, but from the old pensioner woman who is going to sue him for filming her. I just hope all drivers turn their car cams off when she’s around😁.
Ive had armed police after flying by accident into a temp red area. They were amazing with me and i learned how advanced their drone tracking tech is.. they can see your drone and controller even when your controller is off. Furthermore they hold a seperate database for drone missuse and citations given with date,time and why. When they check your detaila they are checking 3 systems. Anti terror , outstanding warrents for arrest international and any active resteictions you may have.. For example if you have a restriction to film people due to an offense.
" even when your controller is off. " you contradicted the officer in the viddy who stated they were alerted the moment its switched on . who's the bluffer selling the porkies pies ??? ... twinkle twinkle little star how i wonder .....
I really think they were professional after all especially as they knew they were being filmed so they may have been in trouble if they did not act on the bye laws. Good audit.
They also lied about the drone. They can’t track a tiny drone. Only if you inform them you’re flying. And how the hell would they know your operator ID when it’s not tagged to a drone. Only by a sticker. Nothing digitally ties your Id to the drone.
Why do you want to be awkward and not just give your name and address but as soon as some bigger boys turn up you run through businesses ignoring health and safety etc scared and then ring the same people you don’t want to comply with. Strange
So whats the big deal about getting your name? Because they have the power to do so, nothing else. 4 cops came out because they got nothing better to do and because a boy with a camera could be anyone.
@BigFly028 let's be honest he makes these video for this exact reason so he can say no to the police and make them feel like they have no authority over you unless ur breaking the law which always ends up with the police having a bruised ego because they cant boss u arpind and feel incharge which results in them abusing thier power to show u who's the boss is ..... it would be wasting less police time if they accepted they have no power because no laws been broken and moved on my they can't let go of thier ego
The pc says you’re on their property aren’t you when talking about the detention centre but just before that he said while on the airport’s footprint. Is the airport’s footprint or the private property of the detention centre?
That bylaw only applies to the airport. Being on the “footprint” does not count. They also try to use it because they police the airport in all areas. They are wrong. You’re not at the airport.
YOU CAN NOW LOOK FOR ANY ONE THAT HAS MODDED THERE CARS Large or Big Bore Exhausts,, Neon & tinted lights,,,,,spoilers NO MORE THAN 6in above the car,,,,,,,,Stretched tyres ,,,,LOWERING SPRING must not interfere with the height of the headlights.
That's odd, I flew out of Gatwick recently, while at the airport I needed directions to the gate, I asked a policeman. He didn't ask me for my name, address, passport etc, he simply gave me directions, so clearly he didn't need to know who he was talking to.
"You don't have to be rude... I will sue you... I don't give a damn about the law..." Oh the irony!
Can you imagine that woman telling a judge that she doesn't give a damn about the law?😂
Yes....Actually i can....😂
One thing worse than a copper, is a roid head copper! 👍😃
eastenders
shes a Karren
@@rosehippyguy3402 definitely on steds with arm's like that 😆
How many cops does it take to tackle a man with a camera? At least 4 more than turn up for a burglary at a private home.
Very unlikely to get a burglary at an airport to be fair.
Those coppers weren't local response bobbies, they are for the Airport.
Judge dredds got no tattoos nor RoboCop
I assume that ever since 9/11 happened then airport incidents are treated with extra security provisions and I'm totally fine with that. Theoretically speaking back in the year 2001, any one of Osama Bin Laden's associates could have been just a man with camera.
"Not in our interest to lie to you"!!!!The biggest joke of the year.😂😂😂
That's a lie to start , in a previous video a cop lies about seeing him go into a building when he just looks through the open door . Never trust the thin blue line gang
@@juststewman7455 And the video where the blonde PCSO said he sent the drone up and he hadn't😡
But if it was in our interest..............we would lie
@@alexbowie6316 But as police officers they shouldn't.
The whole of South Yorkshire police lied over hills borough😡
You would think at her age she would have more comnmon sense and at least a very basic knowlege of the law. The driver of red Citroen LJ14 PYP broke the law by driving while operating a mobile phone/ even as a camera CU80 Offence 6 Penalty points. A real shame the bully boys aren't arresting criminals rather than harassing the public.
3:38 This woman was completely trapped in a giant bubble of feelings.“I don’t give a damn about the law right this minute”. Just “wow!”🤦🏽
She is a giant bubble.
I thought coppers were understaffed? Four of them standing around dictating to a bloke filming. What a joke!
AFO's here are doing their job.
Airports are different, no issues with them being extra safe about airports.
That lady threatens to sue and then contradicts herself by saying she doesn't care about the law.
A self confessed anarchist .
@@EvenBigger-Brotheryou obviously dont know the true meaning of anarchy
Just another sad Karen🙄
Classic
@@createbelief8678 "a state of disorder due to absence or non-recognition of authority or other controlling systems."
The lady got in a state of disorder due to the controlling system that allows us lawfully to flex our rights . Captain obvious at your service ..press the little bell to request attention .
Those historic words, I will sue you! I hope that woman doesn’t use a dash cam or flys over people’s property without permission.
They r old school. That would have worked with a TV documentary or something to blur her face
Many people have lost the ability to think mostly infects PO LICE
She wouldn't be a drone flyer...oh, wait, you mean on her broom ;)
i was upset she had a vape..would of looked cooler if she was smoking a cigarette..would of suited her more !
“Immigrant removal centre”. It must be very peaceful working in a place that does NOTHING.
Trespass in the UK is a civil matter. No damage and no issue. If you walk up to a camera you will become the star of the show.
Apart from the Karen at first the police and security was very calm and polite.
Some quite good interactions to be honest.
They were amazing, imagine if this happened in a different country!
because they know they are being filmed.
But what a well spoken security guard... understandable for a change.
29:10 It might sound like you have to give details to an airport cop whenever he asks for it, no matter if there is no law or bylaw broken. However it would mean that the airport police have more powers than every other cop in the country. When in reality airport police are at the bottom of the pile. Its worth noting that it is in section 10 which is all about accidents, so the giving of name and address in relation to an accident would be reasonable. To give it for no reason other than a cop asking for it is not reasonable. It would mean that a cop could get a woman's name and address and not be punished for it. Totally unreasonable. Also worth noting that article 8 stands so a law has to be broken before details can be given.
Don't you only have to give your details to a judge.
You know there's a big 'except...' in Article 8 though.
Is works in the same way as GDPR/DPA - there's a ton of exemptions where policing/security are involved.
The specifc authority to create a byelaw for this is given in the Airports Act 1986 s2 and applies to any Airport Official and Police Officer.
@nathanwilson3737 Don't have to give details to anyone
@@openyourlies only to a judge
Cracking bunch of lads,, very understanding bunch, stay safe and sound DJE... 😊👊❤️🇬🇧
This was an amazing vid...DJE, you showed the boys in blue huge respect...When you needed them, they were there for you when those car dealer thugs were chasing you. Awesome vid mate.
Gross tattoos and possible steroid use....must think he looks great.
🤡
Police shirts only come in small.
guys a tool. with a first class ticket to toolsville on the tool bus.
Right arm spelling Big brother Left arm Tracy .They all seemed to be amicable except the lady in the car at the start .
Not a good look .
She doesn't give a dam about the law lol
Cop, we wouldn't lie to you........................and the bolt of lightning hit an aircraft and killed 140 people..🤣🤣
If you find out that they have demanded your details illegally, sue them.
They repeatedly said "You are liable for arrest" that does not mean, "You will be arrested" I would chance it, for the opportunity to speak to a lawyer. Then you answered all their fishing questions !
and gave his personal address and name !
Yes but then you have them on a false arrest 😮
Some of the best security and police work in any of your videos.
Coppers ‘we need to know who you are!’ Unless you come across the channel on a dinghy
impossible to find out ,they throw their passports in the sea, if they drown their identity is found in two days
Worst type of person going up to someone and filming them to get a confrontation then when confronted you cry about it
Then cry for police who he constantly hounds 😂😂😂
Basic rule. There is no right to privacy in a public place. These security guards need to mimd their own business and stop obstructing pilots from enjoying their civil liberties
Wow that old woman was the absolute definition of a Karen. I think the tattooed cop used to work at Fort used car sales Birmingham😀.
Still running from car showroom 😂😂
He was desperate for the police then! He was quicker than Linford Christie! 🤭😆🤣
The lad walking back must be Karen’s fella 😂
It's OK woman, I won't put your face on TV, or newspaper, or a podcast. I'll put it on Twitter. 🤣
It’s not called Twitter anymore
Corrr you are mad
An example of good Policing right there. Respectful at all times and free education thrown in. Always good when all part their own ways smiling.
Couple days ago i discoverd this channel. Keep up the filming, the more drama the better! Cheers!
They actually seemed like decent coppers
There’s always one with blue arms who’s a bully. You can see he’s on the ROIDS !
On the juice 100%
You done the right thing regarding giving your details it begs to differ whether its correct but i would trust them untill educated on the matter and im sure you will for future reference.
As you said prevents you from losing your equipment for the second time .
Love your work very educational great work you do keep it up m8 love from Scotland
What I find funny about these encounters on private property is they argue for ages about rights to film and never once just tell the person to leave
That was priceless, a police officer saying ''We wouldn't lie to you''
What reason do they expect you to give for filming? Are they hoping for an answer that can get you locked up?
KAREN ALERT lol😂
Wow brilliant video and a great set of guys. They are very professional well done guys.
Oh look, council reference number on the lamp posts, = public road
that lady really thought she knew what she was talking about :D
Pretty sure you need the land owners permission to film from a private road. The fact that is is publicly accessible only gives you the right to transit the road, not film from it. The publicly accessible part means you can be trespassed from it if the land owner so wished to do so through a civil court. If you take your drone off from that land without the express permission of the land owner you are committing an offence. I'm not sure why you continue to film these contested sites, why not just stick to public land, there are still loads of places where you can make informative, entertaining videos without getting into muddy waters.
There was NO drone at Gatwick. One of the biggest lies of all time.
There was NO drone at Gatwick....
Until the police started putting their drones up.
Then more reports of drones started coming in.
So the police kept putting their drones up to find the drones that were being reported.
And then their was more reports of drones being up.
The reports only stopped when the police grounded their drones.
They spent £800,000 on the investigation.
_"No culprit or evidence of drones was found"_
It was from December 2018, after reports by a pilot and ground staff of suspected sightings of a drone around the flightpath of Gatwick airport. No drone was found after investigations, but there was disruption to flights and a closure for over a day.
@@DesertRat63it was used as an excuse to bring In the new drone laws. Was there fuck a drone ever there.
@@DesertRat63 And subsiquently, not one shred of evidence has ever been presented that there was in fact a drone present. Even Sussex Police admitted "there may not have been a drone".
@@DesertRat63 Agreed, but it was a false flag to create a ton of rules.
Karen was hilarious! Gonna sue you but doesn’t care about the law 😂
Take the arrest they dont have cells and its a total pain for them to arrest you, they would have to call the local plod.
Great video, everyone brilliantly handled.
These police operate at such a high level they know what they're doing, and they don't have to swing their egos about.
Quite refreshing in fact.
"If I see that video in a newspaper"
She's on her way to Hogwarts
None of these clowns can grasp the 'publically accessible' part of a private area.!! 😂😂
If they can't abuse their powers and step on people's rights while conducting lawful activities, they just aren't enjoying their jobs these days, are they?
Great officers, very good attitude.
“If my image ends up on a podcast… I will sue you”.
“You don’t know the law”.
“I don’t give a damn about the law”.
🤨🤷♂️🤔
It's fascinating to me the different dynamics between law enforcement interactions in the United States and Great Britain. Over hear our cops would bully, threaten, lie, intimidate and give unnecessary directives. Over there your officers are courteous, polite and cordial. No bullies of intimidation at all.
He said on the “FOOTPRINT of the airport,” when on his phone it clearly states, “ON the airport”… it’s a shame you didn’t notice that DJ.
That access road is part of the airport. The detention centre is not. He is standing on the access road. Look at page 153/154 of the gatwick master plan 2019
Well caught, when beefy said "footprint" it sounded iffy.
@@wellerjam prove it .
@@wellerjam Could you argue that you were outside the fenced area and believe their request to be legally wrong?
@@WhiteDieselShedHe knew he was on the airport land, he even says so. It was confirmed when he was told he had passed the signs saying he was and access for authorised user only..
No details are required unless an articulable crime has been committed for which they require proof. Their suspicion that a crime might have been committed is not proof and they have no right to demand your details, or to threaten you with arrest unless you provide them whilst they ascertain if a crime has been committed.
Good to see friendly professional cops for a change, fair play...
Great video mate "Serco" says it all the dodgy track and trace scandal.
Great interaction with the 4 plodders, interesting information from them about the drones being flagged on their systems
Be afraid She’s gonna sue you 😂
From a legal perspective you need to get the police to issue you 'the threat of arrest' before you hand over details. Get them to verbalize it so if you find that they didn't have the authority to demand details, you have a viable claim.
How much would they charge killed me 😂😂 great vid as always mate 👍
Does the cop with the large biceps realise that steroid use is against the law? Stop worrying about a camera and worry about your long term health!
Agree on the health side effects but steroid use is not against the law.
It’s illegal to sell not to take
@@three.one_four what’s not nowadays ??
Steroid use isn't against the law, it's illegal to sell them.
Dj is cooking!
DJE bottled it ...Thas why AB is the GOAT ,no way hes giving details ..
AB just wouldn’t audit airport byelaw locations. If he did , he would give them.
He didn't bottle it. You can try it or watch AB.
@scarlettspear7447 Sorry mate .. DJE is the GOAT 🐐 as well 😆
Your gonna get sued by that woman now 😂😂😂
Well done Daniel for giving your details.
Heathrow bye law 10.1 is EXACTLY THE SAME !
Confirm.
I hear that DJE has gone into hiding, but not from the thugs at Fort used car sales, but from the old pensioner woman who is going to sue him for filming her. I just hope all drivers turn their car cams off when she’s around😁.
If she was a pensioner she wouldn’t be working
@@Rainbow-f1v I didn’t know that pensioners weren’t allowed to work?
You're a definitively brave bud. Wow! (Canada)
Ive had armed police after flying by accident into a temp red area. They were amazing with me and i learned how advanced their drone tracking tech is.. they can see your drone and controller even when your controller is off. Furthermore they hold a seperate database for drone missuse and citations given with date,time and why.
When they check your detaila they are checking 3 systems. Anti terror , outstanding warrents for arrest international and any active resteictions you may have..
For example if you have a restriction to film people due to an offense.
" even when your controller is off. " you contradicted the officer in the viddy who stated they were alerted the moment its switched on . who's the bluffer selling the porkies pies ??? ... twinkle twinkle little star how i wonder .....
Hi there DJ, I totally love all of your content and really appreciate the effort and devotion you put in to all your videos. Great work buddy 👍
Surely you can refuse if requested. If they demanded, supported by actual law, then you would not be able to refuse.
Can it be a private road and a police speed check area, at the same time?
This is a Private road for private companies, we dont get no strangers round here!
I really think they were professional after all especially as they knew they were being filmed so they may have been in trouble if they did not act on the bye laws. Good audit.
You lost this interaction big time
Moments after declaring you will sue someone using the law, to say you don’t give a damn about the law????
It's So Amazing ,That These People Don't Know By Now, That The Auditors Will Be Around At Some Point !!!!😀
educational video! thanks.
How do you find out when a road is private property. Signage may not be accurate.
i live nearby and that first women came out of her house whilst I was jogging and shouted at me asking why i keep running past her house 😂
They also lied about the drone. They can’t track a tiny drone. Only if you inform them you’re flying. And how the hell would they know your operator ID when it’s not tagged to a drone. Only by a sticker. Nothing digitally ties your Id to the drone.
Defo needs to be tested for steroids
I don't give a damn about the law.......I'm going to sue you😂😂😂😂
Yeah the Video Says Everything lol 😂😂👍👍
These officers were absolutely brilliant with dje .
Time’s running out people looking for you,
People been saying that about Cycling Micky for years. Nothing ever happens..
Why do you want to be awkward and not just give your name and address but as soon as some bigger boys turn up you run through businesses ignoring health and safety etc scared and then ring the same people you don’t want to comply with. Strange
Straight into it! 😂
Why don't people understand if you go to Disney land you don't need to ask everybody permission 😂
So whats the big deal about getting your name? Because they have the power to do so, nothing else. 4 cops came out because they got nothing better to do and because a boy with a camera could be anyone.
He couldn't be anyone. He could only be someone.
@@TimTheComputerDoctorone of the policeman said this not me "a boy with a camera could be anyone".
Well if he did anything they would ha e a name and address to find him
@@musclemadnes do you not think the police have more important things to be doing?
@BigFly028 let's be honest he makes these video for this exact reason so he can say no to the police and make them feel like they have no authority over you unless ur breaking the law which always ends up with the police having a bruised ego because they cant boss u arpind and feel incharge which results in them abusing thier power to show u who's the boss is ..... it would be wasting less police time if they accepted they have no power because no laws been broken and moved on my they can't let go of thier ego
You are a legend 😂😂😂😂
He is only happy when he gets confrontation, what a sad individual.
Then you’re sad for watching.
@@alexfilma16 Too right!
So am I 😂
triggered karens are the best
That’s the whole point you more on
"I don't give a DAMN about the law". I was shocked to hear a supposedly respectable citizen make such a statement to the entire world.
The pc says you’re on their property aren’t you when talking about the detention centre but just before that he said while on the airport’s footprint.
Is the airport’s footprint or the private property of the detention centre?
Great video by the way dje
That bylaw only applies to the airport. Being on the “footprint” does not count. They also try to use it because they police the airport in all areas. They are wrong. You’re not at the airport.
Incorrect again. Check the map of the airport.
Love these part time lawyers!
YOU CAN NOW LOOK FOR ANY ONE THAT HAS MODDED THERE CARS Large or Big Bore Exhausts,, Neon & tinted lights,,,,,spoilers NO MORE THAN 6in above the car,,,,,,,,Stretched tyres ,,,,LOWERING SPRING must not interfere with the height of the headlights.
That's odd, I flew out of Gatwick recently, while at the airport I needed directions to the gate, I asked a policeman. He didn't ask me for my name, address, passport etc, he simply gave me directions, so clearly he didn't need to know who he was talking to.
Constantly referring to being on the ‘Footprint’ tells me the old bill were being economical with the truth..!