I am glad to see there is at least one person out here who used variables other than 'age' and 'height'. Thank you for a very concise and clear tutorial.
In short: Sig. < 0.05 = significant and reject null-hypothesis 'there is no correlation' and then look at the correlation coef., is this higher than 0.5? then there's correlation. But when this is higher than 0.5 but sig > 0.05, there's still no correlation.
Can you please write down the conclusion that you made at the end about the result? Because it kind a hard for me to listen carefully of what you say. Thank you. I hope you will reply me because im working on a research now which i need to use and study this. Thanks 😊
Thanks for the great vid. Just one question: If the significance level is set at .05 and the test is 2-tailed, isn't it the case that the sig-level needs to be divided by 2. Hence, the sig-threshold is at .025? Or do we have a total sig-level of .1? Many thanks in advance :)
Thanks, I've watched so many videos on this but yours was the clearest and simplest!
I am glad to see there is at least one person out here who used variables other than 'age' and 'height'. Thank you for a very concise and clear tutorial.
The best explanation ever heard. These videos are helping me to patch up the missing links in my SPSS knowledge.
Your explanation is very clear but I'm not sure whether I'm really dumb or I'm watching a wrong video for my analysis.
Sweet mother of Newton thank you for that video
In short: Sig. < 0.05 = significant and reject null-hypothesis 'there is no correlation' and then look at the correlation coef., is this higher than 0.5? then there's correlation. But when this is higher than 0.5 but sig > 0.05, there's still no correlation.
Can you please write down the conclusion that you made at the end about the result? Because it kind a hard for me to listen carefully of what you say. Thank you. I hope you will reply me because im working on a research now which i need to use and study this. Thanks 😊
and I'm here 10 years later!
You are the best
So basically, if the 20% rule is violated, we take likelihood instead of pearson as the p-value?
thanks, helped me out a lot
Thanks for sharing your knowledge
Thank you for your help :)
Thank you!
Can you please tell me where to find the table values.
Excuse me , can anyone explain me when my prices are for example -,106 with sig.2-tailed ,133 what does this means?
thanks
Thanks for the great vid.
Just one question: If the significance level is set at .05 and the test is 2-tailed, isn't it the case that the sig-level needs to be divided by 2. Hence, the sig-threshold is at .025?
Or do we have a total sig-level of .1?
Many thanks in advance :)
Explanation on interpretation of result please