Very cool video and great job on showing the power of docker.. my only suggestion would be that you could have used a multi-step build which would have made the image much smaller. I’d also suggest using the from / to cache in the build command. And now of course the challenge we all should ask ourselves when we’ve got a working container… how small can I make it 😂 Its Alpine Time 😂
you keep on saying Zig this Zig that...what is it actually? somekind of speedster lizard species? Can you cover more on this, it sounds interesting! anyway great video, cheers!
- How to share with other people? - But of course, use a 3rd party platform! Aka dockerhub? - But why not the docker image itself directly ? - Because the process to do it on either end isn't as streamlined/easy as using dockerhub. - oh great, another dependency on a 3rd party platform
With colima (docker alternative) and possibly with docker desktop on the "target" machine you should be able to choose what architecture to run in the vm. Because docker on mac os runs inside vm. So you wouldnt need arm image.
not convinced that replacing ubuntu:latest in Dockerfile with specific version is the way to go. I mean sure, at the time of the build it gave you the more recent version, but you are permanently locked in on that version. As opposed to :latest, which might not give you the bleeding edge but it's a rolling reference, so with each build it keeps the dependency up-to-date.
@@typecraft_dev ah, right, my bad! I mostly work with docker compose environments, not so much with images, so I didn't realize they are immutable. cheers!
I wish to have an emulation of an ibm compatible PC with intel i7 x64 with a modern geforce or radeon graphic with VBE 3 bios on PCIe starting in 16 bit mode of the intel CPU (first core) with MS DOS 5 for my Android tablet ARM CPU ready to to startup the other intel cores and switching into the 64 bit mode from 16 to 32 bit to 64 bit. Dosbox have only 16 and 32 bit and no videomode for full hd 1920x1080 to fit the wide screen display of the tablet, but modern VBE 3 bios have modenumbers for 16:9 and 16: 10 aspect ratio. We can use these modenumbers in 16 bit mode of the intel CPU before switching to 64 bit.
I used to play Minecraft with my daughter when she was a little girl. Is it possible to use Docker to “revive” the Minecraft setup we had back then and play it on my current laptop? I still have the files (Minecraft directory, worlds, mods, etc) on an external drive.
FWIW, most Minecraft launchers have great support for older versions. It should be as simple as: 1. Installing that specific version of Minecraft. 2. Installing the right mod loader you were using. 3. Copying over any mods, resource packs, shaders, and worlds. 4. Running the game. In step 3, if you're using a modern launcher like Prism, you can just use the names of the mods and look for the latest versions that support that Minecraft version. Minecraft is pretty much already fully cross-platform + insanely backwards compatible (in the sense that you can run older versions), so you don't gain anything from Docker here.
What I struggle to understand. Isn't the best thing about docker, that it's portable? I believed Docker handles for me the hardware abstraction layer? But why did you then had to create a new image for aarch64? Shouldn't the image be hardware-agnostic?
ahhh, I figured it out. Because docker obviously still uses the kernel of the host-os, it's not architecture independent - it's not a VM. Damn, what a shame. But how does docker know, if i tell in my Dockerfile "FROM ubuntu:latest", which host architecture I use?
Sure why not. Something along the lines of kubectl run kubedoom -rm -it -image=typecraft/terminal-doom:latest (Ok now i want to try when i am back at the office….)
Adding sound depended entirely on your architecture and which program you used for sound (alsa, pulseaudio). It was too much work for this video, which really was meant to demonstrate running a dockerfile on different machines
Please don’t call it „Docker container“. Better just „container image“. There are many other (better?) runtimes out there. (Podman, Kubernetes, and more) All run the same OCI image format
Lemmie guess, she hates it because it's not a Docker image, since a "Docker image" is an OCI-compliant container image which contains the Docker CLI and/or daemon, and yours does not? I knew it.
Omg you’re not a real arch user!! Your with a real women. Not just like rest of us that definitely have a long distance relationship that’s also with a real person!
![Twenty One Pilots - The Line (from Arcane Season 2) [Official Audio]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/XCz7WUotXs8/mqdefault.jpg)
Thanks nerd
Hell yeah Indonesian🗣️
You ain't him bro
An Arch user with a Wife 😮
How did you think he got his wife... btw :P
Imagine being a Nix user then
Meanwhile gentoo being polyamorous 😎
yay -S wife
It's obviously an AI generated image of a wife.
LMAO the root username in your wife's terminal 😂
-WIFE ~> sudo rm -rf husband
This sounds like docker sponsored ad for docker scout.
Very cool video and great job on showing the power of docker.. my only suggestion would be that you could have used a multi-step build which would have made the image much smaller. I’d also suggest using the from / to cache in the build command. And now of course the challenge we all should ask ourselves when we’ve got a working container… how small can I make it 😂 Its Alpine Time 😂
Great suggestion!
docker image of your Neovim for Newbs... Or do I miss that already?
Thank you so much for your work!
100k before December 💪💪💪 go nerd
Hell yeah let’s gooooo
This was a great video! Thank you!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Great Video Sir!!
Thanks!
you keep on saying Zig this Zig that...what is it actually? somekind of speedster lizard species? Can you cover more on this, it sounds interesting!
anyway great video, cheers!
Zig is a programming language.
- How to share with other people?
- But of course, use a 3rd party platform! Aka dockerhub?
- But why not the docker image itself directly ?
- Because the process to do it on either end isn't as streamlined/easy as using dockerhub.
- oh great, another dependency on a 3rd party platform
The AI generated wife was really impressive.
With colima (docker alternative) and possibly with docker desktop on the "target" machine you should be able to choose what architecture to run in the vm. Because docker on mac os runs inside vm. So you wouldnt need arm image.
wooow 100k subs!
🎉 we did it! lots more to come!
You are so good at this. Another great vid.
why haven't you built starting from the Arch image?
Nice one!
Waiting for someone to mention nix's docker builder.....
NO!
Quite nice Docker ad...
Could you just package it as a binary and send it over?
Quick question. Does docker use your ram or not, when running docker image?
not convinced that replacing ubuntu:latest in Dockerfile with specific version is the way to go. I mean sure, at the time of the build it gave you the more recent version, but you are permanently locked in on that version. As opposed to :latest, which might not give you the bleeding edge but it's a rolling reference, so with each build it keeps the dependency up-to-date.
Good point, but the image isn't getting re-built with newer versions of ubuntu, it's immutable anyways. And locking down a version isn't a bad idea.
@@typecraft_dev ah, right, my bad! I mostly work with docker compose environments, not so much with images, so I didn't realize they are immutable. cheers!
Instructions unclear. Can't find a wife.
lol
Have you tried using Docker Scout to see if it can find one for you? 😏
That's Nice!
I wish to have an emulation of an ibm compatible PC with intel i7 x64 with a modern geforce or radeon graphic with VBE 3 bios on PCIe starting in 16 bit mode of the intel CPU (first core) with MS DOS 5 for my Android tablet ARM CPU ready to to startup the other intel cores and switching into the 64 bit mode from 16 to 32 bit to 64 bit. Dosbox have only 16 and 32 bit and no videomode for full hd 1920x1080 to fit the wide screen display of the tablet, but modern VBE 3 bios have modenumbers for 16:9 and 16: 10 aspect ratio. We can use these modenumbers in 16 bit mode of the intel CPU before switching to 64 bit.
Doesn't seem to work under Windows WSL. 😭
Docker is my one of best and my fav. IT tool
I used to play Minecraft with my daughter when she was a little girl. Is it possible to use Docker to “revive” the Minecraft setup we had back then and play it on my current laptop? I still have the files (Minecraft directory, worlds, mods, etc) on an external drive.
FWIW, most Minecraft launchers have great support for older versions. It should be as simple as:
1. Installing that specific version of Minecraft.
2. Installing the right mod loader you were using.
3. Copying over any mods, resource packs, shaders, and worlds.
4. Running the game.
In step 3, if you're using a modern launcher like Prism, you can just use the names of the mods and look for the latest versions that support that Minecraft version.
Minecraft is pretty much already fully cross-platform + insanely backwards compatible (in the sense that you can run older versions), so you don't gain anything from Docker here.
@@rohitkharsan Awesome!, appreciate it.
Docker is the best!
You’re the best
What I struggle to understand. Isn't the best thing about docker, that it's portable? I believed Docker handles for me the hardware abstraction layer? But why did you then had to create a new image for aarch64? Shouldn't the image be hardware-agnostic?
ahhh, I figured it out. Because docker obviously still uses the kernel of the host-os, it's not architecture independent - it's not a VM. Damn, what a shame. But how does docker know, if i tell in my Dockerfile "FROM ubuntu:latest", which host architecture I use?
Any Linux user with the hipster mid life crisis vibes must provide proof of wife. And I don't mean it in a mean way, I'm in the same boat ;)
well technically speaking, I am a geek, not a nerd.
sorry geek
Bro is too uncool he still thinks "Arch BTW" not "Nix BTW"
Also now "docker BTW" still not "Nix BTW"
Damn, back onto GNOME after Hyprland? Well whatever works! lol
I switch between all things pretty constantly. its part of why i love linux. so many options
Hmmm, could you deploy it to kubernetes, and let people ssh and than create for them instance of doom? 🤔
Sure why not.
Something along the lines of
kubectl run kubedoom -rm -it -image=typecraft/terminal-doom:latest
(Ok now i want to try when i am back at the office….)
@@martin_emrich Imagine making operator , or some sort of login so you just ssh on some machine, and then it creates separate pod just for you.
rhonj on top fr
BTW💥
Shouldn't Ubuntu latest get the "latest" version of Ubuntu??!!!
it must the be latest LTS release? /shrug
No doom sound in the docker image
Adding sound depended entirely on your architecture and which program you used for sound (alsa, pulseaudio). It was too much work for this video, which really was meant to demonstrate running a dockerfile on different machines
@@typecraft_devmaybe you can just mount /dev/dsp from host to the container then it would not be that much work
Programmersarealsohuman runs doom on a Microwave.
Please don’t call it „Docker container“. Better just „container image“. There are many other (better?) runtimes out there. (Podman, Kubernetes, and more)
All run the same OCI image format
Paid actress for sure
Lemmie guess, she hates it because it's not a Docker image, since a "Docker image" is an OCI-compliant container image which contains the Docker CLI and/or daemon, and yours does not? I knew it.
I will never believe the docker hype
not support any dos based system
We dont see the wife
shes in there!
Omg you’re not a real arch user!! Your with a real women. Not just like rest of us that definitely have a long distance relationship that’s also with a real person!
Censoring detected.
Huh?
@typecraft_dev probably by YT...
is Docker Scout an amazing tool?
You put out amazing content but these arch btw and nvim btw jokes are getting too repetitive and annoying.
How else do I tell people I use arch? (Btw)