I had a civil trial against a pro se litigant. She made every mistake in the book, but I also knew that if I was going to call her on all of it, everything I did had to be perfect. That was almost harder than most other cases I've had!
She was utterly insufferable and should have been jailed within 5 minutes for contempt of court for consistently interrupting and walking about attempting to intimidate witnesses and the prosecution.
All I can think of is that he wanted to give her zero grounds for appeal and let the case play out as best he could (he already knew how it was going to go and was able to write his decision beforehand).
@@homeloanexpert While possible I still think that's a charitable explanation for his incredibly passive behavior dealing with multiple and serious instances of open contempt of court. IMO, he's a weak judge who has difficulty controlling difficult or obstreperous defendants.
Because that would have just added another contempt hearing, which would have pushed back the actual trial. It's a delay tactic that broadcasts loudly that any trial with this nutcase is going to be a nightmare. So while the 'entertaining' option would have been to frog march her right back to lockup from the offset, the best option is just to push through to a verdict and be done with her: at least for now.
Exactly. I worked in a courthouse for a while. Most people coming in are criminals, psychos, rude, and idiots. They would never get through anything if they stopped every case. It sucks, but they have to get through this crap. @@MrJptruss
If all the people in the courtroom are supporting her, police needed to be waiting in the parking lot to ticket all of them for not having valid license plates, etc.
They did that for a group supporting Rise Of The Moors in Massachusetts a couple of years ago. Towed their cars, had long discussion with troopers on video.
Sov Cits drive me nuts. She isn't smart enough to know what she's even trying to say. Mincing words and taking laws out of context. She needs to be in jail if for no other reason than I no longer have to hear here. LOL
Someone needs to tell them the person whose SOLE PURPOSE IS TO INTERPRET LAWS!!! They try to tell the court what the law is when that is what the court is for.
Between police body cams and Court cams, I'm flabbergasted by the amount of insanity in this country. Sad. She's out of her mind and has no idea. It's all of us that are wrong.
More than 330 million people in the US so, as much as I enjoy these videos, they still represent a very small minority of stupidity and abject lunacy. But, yeah, I agree with you it is sad.
She lives in her own little world and wants the rest of us to proscribe to her soveREIGN SHITizen Jabberwocky aka Jabber Wacky nonsense! Judges preside over 'disputes' and follows the laws made by our reps in Congress so if you don't like their laws go see them!!! Our military doesn't not take orders from soveREIGN SHITizens!!! If you don't like the laws in this state, move to another state or country as you need the majority of voters to agree with you and we don't want to go back to our Wild West Days of lawlessness where every man is for himself!!! and the fastest draw wins
💯 brutal and I'm only 1/2 way thru ohmygosh I'd be in contempt at this point, either laughing eye rolling or ohmygosh shut up you nut!!! Disrespectful, I mean, she HAS potential but doesn't know any law whatsoever 😂
The judge is giving her 30 days for the first contempt violation. I doubt she will stop at one. This judge is great with sovereign citizens. He ignores most of what they say. He lets them put their beliefs on the record to show any court of appeals or compla8ntmthat she is nuts.
The blockers with their tender and sensitive feelings removed/took down my CLEAN AND DECENT comment in response to your CLEAN AND DECENT comment when I replied about referring to her as a “lady” being A INSULT TO ALL TRUE LADIES worldwide. AND I am number 93 “thumbs up” for your CLEAN AND DECENT comment😊.
Me too! I’ve never seen a person be able to hold a loud, interrupting spewing and speak over the judge while he’s doing court business. I hope her and all her flying monkeys reap the “benefits” of her Hitler like brainwashing.
It was so embarrassing to watch her and that lurker crowd. In her mind I think she heard her speech as if in a movie, “you can’t handle the truth” and they don’t have to nickels to rub together between the lot of them.
She does not have a misunderstanding of the law. It is blatant disregard. It is a fantasy created to avoid responsibility and accountability. It is an excuse to behave against societal norms
@brentfarvors192 no 🤣🤣 your reply is completely irrelevant. The OP (like anyone else) has the free will to feel "sad" about the mentality of this woman and those like her. It's an emotional response tied directly to a particular behavior so........ literally the definition of relevant.
I'm so excited - just got a scholarship to the Beth Michelle Bridgeman School of Law. I'm told my term will begin as soon as the professor is released from jail.
It's something insane like she believes she isn't the defendant if she doesnt go up to the desk. The ones that spoke to her during the case, I would have removed them for obstructing a court proceeding. The Judge was too kind, she would have been in for years before the end of it all if he pinged her for each offence during that one case. SOV CIT basically translates to Complete Idiot in english
@controlfreak1963 Well said ! I've never heard that one before....but going to use it! Here is another gem from Mark Twain along the same lines... " Never try to teach a pig to skng. It's a TOTAL waste of your time and it annoys the pig!! "
@controlfreak1963 Well said ! I've never heard that one before....but going to use it! Here is another gem from Mark Twain along the same lines... " Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a TOTAL waste of your time and it annoys the pig!! "
She brought her audience with her and marches around like she’s the authority and they are all in awe of her. Surely there is a better way for her to do this without costing taxpayers money.
She should have been held in contempt and tried while watching the trial on closed circuit TV after her first outburst. And then had 30 days for contempt added to her sentence.
When she said that she took an oath downstairs, I just imagine her in the disabled stall of the woman's restroom swearing to an oath written on a toilet roll.
For those who want the TL:DR version: Defendant: I saw a frog once. It was green with stripes. I'm hungry. Look, there's a book. I once bumped my knee. What's that noise in my head? Did you know Paris is the capital of France...or is it Texas...I'm confused. Did I leave the stove on? Why do people snore? Prosecutor: I rest my case. Judge: Guilty of contempt of court. Defendant: I can't find all my socks.
"Objection!" "What is the nature of your objection, Miss Fuckwit?" "The court needs to be aware that my nipples are made of gerontology!" "You are clearly mentally ill." "And YOU are attempting to get squirty cheese to try to kill me! Hah! Checkmate judgetard."
What's to evaluate? She's obviously crazy. If not jail, she needs to be confined to a mental institution. Same goes for all her disciples in the courtroom.
I have yet to see a Sov Cit that didn't have a criminal record and/or history of drug and alcohol use!! These people don't want to follow the law but they want to be protected by it and only care about the laws that serve them!!
Let alone 99 out of 100 stops, after all kinds of drama and foolishness about how they're traveling and don't need a license, it ends up they never have one or it's usually revoked. Clown nation. Logic is definitely their Kryptonite
The young man only got caught with a beer underage…not crime of century. He was young and didn’t understand who was who in courthouse. He did not know her until she approached him in courtroom hallway. Defendant exploited his naivety for her own purposes and gave him money. She used him as a stooge. So angry. This is worse than using BS in own case.
@@North_West1 Well said. What this woman did was incredibly predatory. She saw a nervous, vulnerable kid, overwhelmed by his circumstances, and sank her sovcit talons into him. Not all grooming is necessarily sexual, the detail about her giving him money particularly blows me away- _and_ she apparently gave him her number. All kinds of boundaries being crossed by this venal hysteric.
“Your authority has not been substantiated” He literally sent men with guns to your home, pulled you out, and brought you to jail. You had no one to call to stop the process. No one who could legally help you. There is no better example of authority.
I'd argue that your example is more of a demonstration of power than authority. But it's still ridiculous to try to argue that a district judge doesn't have authority to adjudicate in a district court, courtroom
She teaches STRESS REDUCTION skills??? Her uncontrolled ranting, pacing, interrupting was so maddening, I got angry at the judge. And she came with her own little cheer-leading section of like-minded cronies (or should I say "crones"?). God-almighty. I'm speechless.🙄
It’s driving me mad but the judge is just letting her dig her hole. I know the type of people who believe her nonsense. All are failures who blame everyone but themselves. Some are dangerous, as we saw on Jan 6th. They believe trump because they WANT to believe his lies….
@@tedwalford7615 - Great point. Also, more charges mean more court hearings and trials. The patient judge was trying to prevent this crazy person from dominating his courtroom for years. lol
Thank you for posting this. I was about to give up watching halfway through because she is so maddening, but now I'm looking forward to seeing the end. 😅
Too bad she could only get 30 days. It should have been 30 days for each count, to run consecutively, plus a $500 fine for each time she disrupted the proceedings.
Her friends are just as ignorant as she is. The ones who kept talking over the judge should have been held in contempt. The guy who was kicked out shouldn't have been allowed back in.
She accused everyone of violating due process when she violated the kids due process by telling him he doesn't need a lawyer and to do cut up the ticket.
I hope "the kid" learned the valuable lesson to not trust anyone over the age of 7. 7 year olds are brutally honest (except when it comes to who stole the cookie from the cookie jar).
EXACTLY. She keeps claiming no one was harmed. Except for the kid who had to go through extra court appearances and processes because of her horrible advice. She completely violated his right to representation!
Which is surprising because that area is populated with an inordinate number of whackadoodles which is a big reason why I moved to a different part of the state, lol.
Wow, she was lucky. Other judges are not so calm. I once saw a girl who was sentenced to a minor fine. When she turned around and said "whatever", the judge gave her 30 days. Two more flippant remarks - 90 days. This lady has deserved at least as much.
Of course she'd prefer to "stay right here" rather than cooperate with the system by taking the chair the judge offered her. It's all about not complying, like a two-year-old. NO!
The judge showed incredible patience with this wack job. Her sentence should have been 6 months in a state mental institution with at least a year of supervised release.
I’m so angry she tried to use a random naïve young man to do her biding…be her stooge. She planned it out. The young man almost got a slap on wrist charges turned into jail time. The gallery call and response all plan. She knows what she is doing. She is Completely ridiculous and wrong. IMO this is Not a MH competency issue…willful ignorance.
I don't know. With a lot of them, I think it's CLEVER ignorance. They have all the word salad memorized and rehearsed so carefully, I think they know exactly what they're doing. Willful, yes, but clever, too.
Arguing with this defendant is like playing chess with a pigeon, she knocks over the pieces and poops all over the board and struts around as if she has won anyway.
I think the judge was incompetent by not controlling his courtroom and letting her spout contempt upon contempt. She ran the court and turned it into her soapbox. Shame shame shame in this judge!! That poor prosecutor. Did you see the pain on her face the whole time the judge allowed his court to be mocked.
With other SovCits, this Judge has not let the minute-by-minute contemptuous interruptions continue. I believe he was allowing it this time to complete the process without further delay. There was even one SovCit case that was allowed to be appealed to a much higher State Court. I believe that one was also allowed so that lower courts could then cite the Appeals Court ruling that none of the SovCit jabberwocky has anything to do with the real world.
I cannot believe how much of her crazy he was able to tolerate, even engage. But I understand when you deal with somebody like that everything by the book. Her and her minions have been trying to bait him the whole way through and he has the patience of a saint. Go directly to jail and shut the f up!!!
There is patience and there is passivity. I think he crossed over into passivity after the first 15 minutes of this trial. It wasn't a good showing for him.
She’s accusing the court of having coached officers who’re against her, but she brought all of her comrades from the asylum, and none of them had their meds yet.
It's really annoying when judge Gauthier threatens her with contempt, then allows her to continue being contemptuous and to continue disrupt the proceedings.
By law he has to complete the process of each phase of the hearing. If you pay attention though, he allows her to fillabuster past offering herself to give testimony. He asks her if she has any witnesses (meaning even her) and she just refuses to give a straight answer and he moves on... but to be fair, she literally used the whole hearing as her testimonial grandstand time, she didn't need to give any additional testimony. But the judge wanted his decision to be "appeal proof".
@@RRRIBEYE No, I'm an attorney with 20 years practice in Michigan and another 16 years in another jurisdiction. And I say he's a very weak judge who can't handle difficult defendants.
@@AussieWalkabout74 Sometimes I have to take little breaks from the sovcits and the frauditors. When it gets to the point I'm screaming at the monitor "shut the f up", I know it's time to step aside for a little while.
I would hazard a guess that the prosecutor has never had to make her closing statement while a noisy defendant is disruptively walking around and talking to her supporters in the audience, but she did a great job keeping focus. I would have had to keep asking the judge to tell the defendant to be quiet while I was talking!
I'm sure the court officer is more than happy to FINALLY take her in custody. And then she starts to argue about when to begin her sentence. Just great.
It might be difficult to see Judge Gauthier apparently allowing her contemptuous behavior...but by pushing thorough to the end, he ensured that this case is _done._ Note how he immediately told the peanut gallery that they could either shut up or be escorted out. He’s as decisive as he needs to be to get this over and done with.
I can't believe the Judge let her babble that nonsense for so long. Lady, get a better handle on the language before you try to use the grown up words like inalienable.
Multiple people in sovcit movement pronounce it that way-they must believe it's more magical with their pronunciation; like lev-ee-OH-sah vesus LEV-ee-oh-sah
This judge was too patient, he should have never let her carry on that way. The woman was pure cringe and needed to be silenced and locked up until she came out of her delusional state. She needs to come to grips with the fact that as long as she lives in this country she is required to live by its laws, no exceptions.
Her disrespect should have put her in jail until she could behave appropriately. Regardless of your beliefs RESPECT should be given. I wouldn't ever convert to or even listen to this kind of person simply from their behavior. DISGUSTING.
She should have gotten 30 days for practicing law, 30 days for contempt at the show cause and 30 days for the trial, served consecutively. Judges in the US have no spine.
While I would absolutely love to see this lady do 90 days in jail for the disrespect she shows the society she clearly benefits from, like most things it isn't that simple. Every sitting Judge knows the prison system is over max capacity and the per/capita amount of Americans incarcerated is extremely high for a modern western country. Now we could discuss why that is and how to go about lowering it but it doesn't change the facts currently. With this in mind, many Judges (not all) are looking for just about any reason NOT to put people in jail unless it is absolutely necessary. In this ladies case what will 90 days in jail teach her what 30 days won't? She's just going to take up space which is at a premium. She's going to walk out of that jail probably more devoted to her pseudo-law than she was going in. She may be dumber than a box of rocks but she clearly isn't a violent person. The longer a non-violent but dumb person stays in prison the more likely you are to actually turn them into a violent one.
@@Tryst1982 Ya, you aren't wrong. The US as a whole needs complete police and justice reform and that is just to start. 90 days in a psych ward for evaluation might be better but we don't invest in things that help society. It shouldn't be possible for people like this to be a thing.
This woman is or was a social studies teacher I the schools. It’s frightening to think the damage she may have done to her students over the years. Also how did she go off the rails this badly if she was educated enough to be a certified teacher?
OMG every time she mispronounced that word I literally CRINGED... if I had been in the courtroom I would have HAD to correct her and I WISH someone would have!!!!!! What a nut job.
If you're taking bets, I believe she won't. I also believe she will be in the court house the same day she's out of jail and will target someone else's child. Surely this isn't the first time she's done this.
Every time she said that I cringed!! I was always taught that if you don't know how to use a word appropriately, not to use it at all! I wish she would take that advice!!!
Raise your hand if you just wanted her to invoke her 5th Amendment rights, to shut up and stop incriminating herself! For the love of love who created these monsters?
That judge is so nice. I saw another judge who just dealt with these sovcits by saying, okay, you aren't Kevin Smith (or another name here) and he has not presented himself. I will just put out a warrant for them and they will be held without bail. Done. There should be a sovcit law where them pulling this stupid stuff should put an aggravating factor on their cases!
They should just deport anyone claiming to be a sovereign citizen. If you won’t submit to the laws of this country, state, county, and city - then you can leave.
Omg! @ 1:00:51 the judge basically says EVERYTHING I’d been wanting him to say the whole time she ignorantly spoke! It was so nice hearing her grunts as he shut her down.
She has a very distorted view of her importance. She is rude, misguided, unappealing, and paranoid. She gathered up people on the street to support her and, at times, she even argues with herself. At no time does anyone interrupt her or talk over her, which she does repeatedly. There are judges that do not put up with sov cits at all.
A pack of wolves. A flock of birds. A herd of cattle. A squad of marines. A cacophony of sovereign citizens - or maybe an asylum of sovcits - help a brother figure this out...
One of the goals of Sov Cits is to tie up and ultimately disable the entire court system, and they are so far being extremely successful with the first part of their plan.
I've seen a lot of judges who immediately shut them down. If a judge allows it, then they deal with it. It's the same rhetoric everytime, the judge should have a document showing his jurisdiction when they request it, then their only option is to appeal. Then the appelate court should do the same thing.
@@MrFriesz - Yeah, some judges shut them down, but the fact that they're even taking up a slot on the docket in the first place, and requiring time spent by the prosecutor's office and the probation office, and (until the judge allows the sov cit to represent himself or herself) the public defender's office, all chips away at a limited supply of time and resources available in the public judicial system. And usually it's for some crazy issue or violation that would never end up in court for anyone else _except_ a sov cit. They do it on purpose-- the movement is an organized assault on the judicial system.
The plan of too many of our elected federal representatives is similar. Take office, purposely destroy the institutions they were entrusted to safeguard, and then squawk, "Look, the government is broken!"
@@dafterite Actually, they're just building up more case law for future sovcit crap to be more swiftly + clearly decided upon, where similar laws are broken and the same excuses are cited as legally relevant, when they are purely frivolous.
It's recorded. There's no one typing all this up, unless they order a transcript, and they will MAKE HER PAY OUT THE NOSE BECAUSE SHE MADE IT 10X LONGER with all her BS.
Defendant wanted to get ruse out of judge and prosecutor. Ignoring some of her nonsense was a deliberate choice to keep trial moving. Defendant wanted judge get mad and start yelling or for judge to react to each of her points. Judge picked his battles.
I believe the maximum possible was 93 days in jail and a $7500 fine per count. Should have given her full jail time on EACH count, and ordered them served consecutively. Also should have assessed the full fine on each count. The judge was far too lenient on this disruptive nutcase.
@mariehelena2364 she was such a pushover and she should have shut down DUURR-el Brooks every time he opened his dumb c**kholster. She should have known that Brooks had no chance of appeal, so she should not have put up with his antics.
I thought one was supposed to gain wisdom as they got older. This woman is so offensive and embarrassing. It is disgusting that she attempted to manipulate this young man's mind with her venom. Wow! I can't imagine going through life so angry.
She's got enough consecutive contempt findings if the judge wanted to push it that she could have been in jail for about 5 years. Unfortunately, she's still out there pushing this idiocy.
I have to add to one of your on-screen comments. I hope it doesn't offend you because there's no offense intended. "Ma'am, you are already in contempt of court. That ship just sailed." AND THEN IT SUNK. This sovcit lady is something else! They all buy into (literally, for some) this stuff and argue it with cops and courts. It never works, yet they still keep trying. At least it gives us some laughs! Thanks for the great content and excellent work on your vids!
I think that the Sov Cit's don't understand what inalienable means but, since they all believe they can lien the police officers' (nonexistent) bonds they think the word is "unlienable".
15:45 -- She's not capable of controlling herself because she's **scared shitless** (as she should be, I might add) This is what happens to every delusional person who builds air castles grounded in fantasies...the second their fantasies (such as her grandiose fantasies of power and prestige) begin faltering, their entire WORLD begins to collapse.
![Summer Walker - Heart Of A Woman [Official Lyric Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/SFddctbZzw8/mqdefault.jpg)
The poor woman for the state is sitting there thinking “How is this both the easiest and hardest hearing I’ve ever been a part of?”
Right!? 😂 Time for a nice drink after.
At the end she was sitting there looking like she was thinking "How much longer do I have to sit here listening to this?"
I had a civil trial against a pro se litigant. She made every mistake in the book, but I also knew that if I was going to call her on all of it, everything I did had to be perfect. That was almost harder than most other cases I've had!
You have to give her credit for not asking for the maximum and deferring to the judge.
It's like playing a sport with a child.
You need to be polite, show the correct way, but not absolutely destroy them.
She was utterly insufferable and should have been jailed within 5 minutes for contempt of court for consistently interrupting and walking about attempting to intimidate witnesses and the prosecution.
Absolutely right. Why the judge let her get away with all her antics is completely beyond me and I've been a lawyer for 35 years.
All I can think of is that he wanted to give her zero grounds for appeal and let the case play out as best he could (he already knew how it was going to go and was able to write his decision beforehand).
@@homeloanexpert While possible I still think that's a charitable explanation for his incredibly passive behavior dealing with multiple and serious instances of open contempt of court. IMO, he's a weak judge who has difficulty controlling difficult or obstreperous defendants.
I wonder if she got away with threatening the judge with that jiu-jitsu comment.
Why did the judge let this lady continually interrupt the proceedings of the court?
She was in contempt of court throughout the entire process!
Because that would have just added another contempt hearing, which would have pushed back the actual trial. It's a delay tactic that broadcasts loudly that any trial with this nutcase is going to be a nightmare. So while the 'entertaining' option would have been to frog march her right back to lockup from the offset, the best option is just to push through to a verdict and be done with her: at least for now.
Exactly. I worked in a courthouse for a while. Most people coming in are criminals, psychos, rude, and idiots. They would never get through anything if they stopped every case. It sucks, but they have to get through this crap. @@MrJptruss
@@MrJptrussthis plus it keeps the door shut on any appeal
The hearing is done, the case is settled with.scant opportunity of appeal. He did great
@@MrJptruss Place her in jail for disrupting court and proceed via video link where she can be muted, and forced to follow the rules.
If all the people in the courtroom are supporting her, police needed to be waiting in the parking lot to ticket all of them for not having valid license plates, etc.
Now that would've been something to watch police body cam!
Lol! You've seen this dog before.
@@kccluck then there'd be the "angry mob", oh wait nevermind 😆
@@sensesurroundful with 🍿
They did that for a group supporting Rise Of The Moors in Massachusetts a couple of years ago. Towed their cars, had long discussion with troopers on video.
Sov Cits drive me nuts. She isn't smart enough to know what she's even trying to say. Mincing words and taking laws out of context. She needs to be in jail if for no other reason than I no longer have to hear here. LOL
I believe the she is intentionally mispronouncing the words.
She’s hardly “mincing words” - she’s one of the most (indecipherably) outspoken harridans on RUclips.
@@North_West1I don’t. She has a severe case of the dunning kruger effect. “My Honor”. 😂
She's defending her unelateable rights!
Someone needs to tell them the person whose SOLE PURPOSE IS TO INTERPRET LAWS!!! They try to tell the court what the law is when that is what the court is for.
I bet she accepts and gladly cashes her disability checks, welfare checks, and covid relief checks issued to her IN ALL CAPS!
💯💯💯💯💯💯
Not to mention driving on roads maintained by that same government, at least when she has a license.
Between police body cams and Court cams, I'm flabbergasted by the amount of insanity in this country. Sad. She's out of her mind and has no idea. It's all of us that are wrong.
More than 330 million people in the US so, as much as I enjoy these videos, they still represent a very small minority of stupidity and abject lunacy. But, yeah, I agree with you it is sad.
Homeland Security. had a list of these sov cits since the FBI has officially listed them as terrorists.
@@richardclaus4751 true, but I think you have to agree the stupidity level is on the rise. Just spend some time on the road with the crazies
She lives in her own little world and wants the rest of us to proscribe to her soveREIGN SHITizen Jabberwocky aka Jabber Wacky nonsense! Judges preside over 'disputes' and follows the laws made by our reps in Congress so if you don't like their laws go see them!!! Our military doesn't not take orders from soveREIGN SHITizens!!! If you don't like the laws in this state, move to another state or country as you need the majority of voters to agree with you and we don't want to go back to our Wild West Days of lawlessness where every man is for himself!!! and the fastest draw wins
Agreed .
I can’t believe all the excruciating pain and suffering we all endured resulted in a sentence of only 30 days. ⚖❔
The judge should have ordered a competency exam while in custody
She should of gotten at least 6 months to a year.
💯 brutal and I'm only 1/2 way thru ohmygosh I'd be in contempt at this point, either laughing eye rolling or ohmygosh shut up you nut!!! Disrespectful, I mean, she HAS potential but doesn't know any law whatsoever 😂
The old lady constantly picking her teeth was almost soothing compared to this woman human something I can't even remember what she said 😂
The judge is giving her 30 days for the first contempt violation. I doubt she will stop at one. This judge is great with sovereign citizens. He ignores most of what they say. He lets them put their beliefs on the record to show any court of appeals or compla8ntmthat she is nuts.
SovCits show utter contempt for anyone but themselves! This lady was a great example of this dangerous movement! I pity her cell mate!
“This woman…….”, referring to her as a “lady” is an INSULT to ALL TRUE LADIES worldwide.
The blockers with their tender and sensitive feelings removed/took down my CLEAN AND DECENT comment in response to your CLEAN AND DECENT comment when I replied about referring to her as a “lady” being A INSULT TO ALL TRUE LADIES worldwide. AND I am number 93 “thumbs up” for your CLEAN AND DECENT comment😊.
Crazy lady. I think the judge should have slapped more contempt charges on her and given her a lengthier sentence.
Me too! I’ve never seen a person be able to hold a loud, interrupting spewing and speak over the judge while he’s doing court business. I hope her and all her flying monkeys reap the “benefits” of her Hitler like brainwashing.
It was so embarrassing to watch her and that lurker crowd. In her mind I think she heard her speech as if in a movie, “you can’t handle the truth” and they don’t have to nickels to rub together between the lot of them.
Yeah he allows people to take over in his court way too often.
How would more jail time fix her mental health issues?
Referring to her as a “lady” IS AN INSULT TO ALL TRUE LADIES worldwide.
It is so sad that she has tried to brainwash this poor kid with her lies and misunderstanding of the law.
And to brainwash the court members sitting behind the prosecutor.
She does not have a misunderstanding of the law. It is blatant disregard. It is a fantasy created to avoid responsibility and accountability. It is an excuse to behave against societal norms
Completely irrelevant. He (like anyone else), has the free will to take any advice he wants...
@brentfarvors192 no 🤣🤣 your reply is completely irrelevant. The OP (like anyone else) has the free will to feel "sad" about the mentality of this woman and those like her.
It's an emotional response tied directly to a particular behavior so........ literally the definition of relevant.
This comes off like grooming or some shit. Why would she give him money?
I'm so excited - just got a scholarship to the Beth Michelle Bridgeman School of Law. I'm told my term will begin as soon as the professor is released from jail.
LOL
What is their deal with not approaching the bench. They don't want to cross the line between the audience and the court..
It's something insane like she believes she isn't the defendant if she doesnt go up to the desk.
The ones that spoke to her during the case, I would have removed them for obstructing a court proceeding.
The Judge was too kind, she would have been in for years before the end of it all if he pinged her for each offence during that one case.
SOV CIT basically translates to Complete Idiot in english
Yeah, that makes sense (you know what I mean). Lol
😂😂😂
Mark Twain - 'Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience.'
I resemble this remark.
@@LoneWolfUsul 🤣🤣
@controlfreak1963
Well said ! I've never heard that one before....but going to use it!
Here is another gem from Mark Twain along the same lines... " Never try to teach a pig to skng. It's a TOTAL waste of your time and it annoys the pig!! "
@controlfreak1963
Well said ! I've never heard that one before....but going to use it!
Here is another gem from Mark Twain along the same lines... " Never try to teach a pig to sing. It's a TOTAL waste of your time and it annoys the pig!! "
Abraham Lincoln said, "Never argue with a fool. People forget who's who."
She brought her audience with her and marches around like she’s the authority and they are all in awe of her. Surely there is a better way for her to do this without costing taxpayers money.
I wonder if they are all rich and successful, not living in mommies basement. Trump supporters. The young dude is a pretty gullible idjit….
She should start an evilgelical christian church.
She should have been held in contempt and tried while watching the trial on closed circuit TV after her first outburst. And then had 30 days for contempt added to her sentence.
There is - put her ass in jail and let her watch on closed circuit TV. She can be present for her sentencing.
When she said that she took an oath downstairs, I just imagine her in the disabled stall of the woman's restroom swearing to an oath written on a toilet roll.
With a tin foil hat!
100% Notarized with a bog stain.
@@LoneWolfUsul🤢
I was reminded of a group of fake Trump electors meeting in the basement of a swing-state legislature building in 2020. 😅
😂😂
For those who want the TL:DR version:
Defendant: I saw a frog once. It was green with stripes. I'm hungry. Look, there's a book. I once bumped my knee. What's that noise in my head? Did you know Paris is the capital of France...or is it Texas...I'm confused. Did I leave the stove on? Why do people snore?
Prosecutor: I rest my case.
Judge: Guilty of contempt of court.
Defendant: I can't find all my socks.
Nice!
Exactly, word salad.
"Objection!"
"What is the nature of your objection, Miss Fuckwit?"
"The court needs to be aware that my nipples are made of gerontology!"
"You are clearly mentally ill."
"And YOU are attempting to get squirty cheese to try to kill me! Hah! Checkmate judgetard."
Absolutely perfect!
Funny af response
Thank You for the giggle
This is hilarious you win the internet this made me actually laugh out loud this is a funny comment spot on for this nutter
Sov Cit trying to recruit cult members!!! She needs a mental evaluation!!!!
Don't need an evaluation for something so obvious. She needs a hospitalization, a long-term one.
What's to evaluate? She's obviously crazy. If not jail, she needs to be confined to a mental institution. Same goes for all her disciples in the courtroom.
Trying to recruit cult members by showing how badly the arguments fail....
She talks like someone with schizophrenia, or some other form of psychosis.
Does she “my honour”?
I for one would fear for my life if her idea of "Common Law" would completely replace even our current flawed system.
she might be surprised to learn (if she can) that contempt of court is part of common law
I have yet to see a Sov Cit that didn't have a criminal record and/or history of drug and alcohol use!! These people don't want to follow the law but they want to be protected by it and only care about the laws that serve them!!
Let alone 99 out of 100 stops, after all kinds of drama and foolishness about how they're traveling and don't need a license, it ends up they never have one or it's usually revoked. Clown nation. Logic is definitely their Kryptonite
The young man only got caught with a beer underage…not crime of century. He was young and didn’t understand who was who in courthouse. He did not know her until she approached him in courtroom hallway. Defendant exploited his naivety for her own purposes and gave him money. She used him as a stooge. So angry. This is worse than using BS in own case.
@@North_West1 Well said. What this woman did was incredibly predatory. She saw a nervous, vulnerable kid, overwhelmed by his circumstances, and sank her sovcit talons into him.
Not all grooming is necessarily sexual, the detail about her giving him money particularly blows me away- _and_ she apparently gave him her number.
All kinds of boundaries being crossed by this venal hysteric.
I've always said SovCits are either Criminals or Cretins often both.
Many of them are attracted to it because the people spreading it promise that it will get them out of their legal trouble.
“Your authority has not been substantiated”
He literally sent men with guns to your home, pulled you out, and brought you to jail. You had no one to call to stop the process. No one who could legally help you.
There is no better example of authority.
I'd argue that your example is more of a demonstration of power than authority. But it's still ridiculous to try to argue that a district judge doesn't have authority to adjudicate in a district court, courtroom
She teaches STRESS REDUCTION skills??? Her uncontrolled ranting, pacing, interrupting was so maddening, I got angry at the judge. And she came with her own little cheer-leading section of like-minded cronies (or should I say "crones"?). God-almighty. I'm speechless.🙄
She WAS a teacher. She is on disability now and, thankfully, no longer able to poison her pupil's minds with paranoid nonsense.
Fellow cult members.🙄
Just throw her in jail already FFS. Disrespectful cow.
Why doesn't he make her shut up!? That's MORE contempt.
It’s driving me mad but the judge is just letting her dig her hole. I know the type of people who believe her nonsense. All are failures who blame everyone but themselves. Some are dangerous, as we saw on Jan 6th. They believe trump because they WANT to believe his lies….
The only thing I can think of is that by letting her say her piece at this hearing he's proactively countering any grounds for her to appeal.
@@tedwalford7615 Exactly why.
@@tedwalford7615 - Great point.
Also, more charges mean more court hearings and trials. The patient judge was trying to prevent this crazy person from dominating his courtroom for years.
lol
He wanted to settle the case that day
O..m..g... I had a hard time watching her, but the immediate sentence made the pain all worthwhile!!!
Thank you for posting this. I was about to give up watching halfway through because she is so maddening, but now I'm looking forward to seeing the end. 😅
Too bad she could only get 30 days. It should have been 30 days for each count, to run consecutively, plus a $500 fine for each time she disrupted the proceedings.
I was stunned it was basically a slap on the wrist. Put her in jail for a year and have the cook spit in her food. 😂😂
Damn. I’m just watching this vid but just saw your comment. My excitement is squelched…
30 days is standard for contempt. So she did not get any extra for practising law ! She got off easy.
Her friends are just as ignorant as she is. The ones who kept talking over the judge should have been held in contempt. The guy who was kicked out shouldn't have been allowed back in.
She accused everyone of violating due process when she violated the kids due process by telling him he doesn't need a lawyer and to do cut up the ticket.
I hope "the kid" learned the valuable lesson to not trust anyone over the age of 7. 7 year olds are brutally honest (except when it comes to who stole the cookie from the cookie jar).
EXACTLY. She keeps claiming no one was harmed. Except for the kid who had to go through extra court appearances and processes because of her horrible advice. She completely violated his right to representation!
@@blah2blah65h come on !! It totally was the fish in our aquarium !!
All Sovereign Citizens are high-anxiety, miserable people.
"I don't have a license to practice law in the bar, in the arena, in the water. I am a woman on the land . . ." OMG these people!!!!! ROFL
Judge Gauthier's court tends to be pretty tame most of the time, but then out of the blue he'll get some real whackadoos like this 😂
A whole roomful of whackadoos all giving the chief whackadoo advice.
Which is surprising because that area is populated with an inordinate number of whackadoodles which is a big reason why I moved to a different part of the state, lol.
He's not tempermentally equipped to deal with defendants like this.
"Tame" is a very charitable way to describe his judicial posture.
Wow, she was lucky. Other judges are not so calm. I once saw a girl who was sentenced to a minor fine. When she turned around and said "whatever", the judge gave her 30 days. Two more flippant remarks - 90 days. This lady has deserved at least as much.
Got her mind right.
Difference between a real judge and a weak judge
Of course she'd prefer to "stay right here" rather than cooperate with the system by taking the chair the judge offered her. It's all about not complying, like a two-year-old. NO!
You said it!
Judge Oakley from Texas would have made her sit in the chair at the table.
Thank goodness his Mom got him back on track to do what he needed to.
A 63 year old woman should know better.
A 63 year old (something…that’s not a woman) with the mental capacity of a 3 year old toddler.
She has a mental age of a teenager.
She hasn't had a strong pimp hand in her life.
I'm sure we all know teachers who are oddballs, ( Not this bad , I must say).
She appears to be mentally ill.
We were robbed! We NEEDED to see her taken into custody!!
My grandpa taught me that sometimes a little knowledge is worse than none at all .
I think she is suffering more from a perception of knowledge than having a little knowledge.
Classic Dunning-Kruger effect...
The judge showed incredible patience with this wack job. Her sentence should have been 6 months in a state mental institution with at least a year of supervised release.
I’m so angry she tried to use a random naïve young man to do her biding…be her stooge. She planned it out. The young man almost got a slap on wrist charges turned into jail time.
The gallery call and response all plan.
She knows what she is doing. She is Completely ridiculous and wrong. IMO this is Not a MH competency issue…willful ignorance.
Hanlon's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced stupidity is indistinguishable from malice."
Moon's Law: "Any sufficiently advanced willful ignorance is indistinguishable from mental illness."
I don't know. With a lot of them, I think it's CLEVER ignorance. They have all the word salad memorized and rehearsed so carefully, I think they know exactly what they're doing. Willful, yes, but clever, too.
Is that case on line somewhere? How did she get charged with it? Did the kid say she told him to do what he did or what happened..if I may ask..and Ty
@@heatherking8689the kid that testified in white shirt in this video. Longer version on court YT channel.
@@pamd.happykat8187I like your term clever Ignorance, I use term willful ignorance.
She is extreeeeeeeeeeeemely lucky he was so patient and allowed her to get away with her nonsense.
If she really doesn't think that they have any jurisdiction, then why is she participating in an unconstitutional hearing?
Probably because she knows they’d drag her dumbass back.
I don't usually represent myself in court, but when I do, I like to wear a heavy coat and snowboots to protect myself from all the bs I'm spewing.
She needed consecutive 90 day jail for each single contempt charge.
Yup, 17 years in jail for just her contempt charges in this short hearing.
The USA already has more people in prison than any other country in the world. It clearly doesn't fix things, otherwise the country would be perfect.
93 days, but who's arguing. I'd settle for 90.
Never take away someone's inendelibrable rights.
Yeah! Especially those
All she got was 30 days? About a year in prison for real might change her opinion as to who had "jurisdiction."
She'll be back.
@@andrewvelonis5940 That's guaranteed. She isn't even close to done yet.
Maybe the jails are full and they don't have the space for all these sov nuts.
Arguing with this defendant is like playing chess with a pigeon, she knocks over the pieces and poops all over the board and struts around as if she has won anyway.
😂😂😂😂 LMFAO this is the best comment ever!!!!!
Man....that lady is off her rocker! I applaud the mountain of patience the judge showed her. She needed way more than 30 days in jail.
Excuse me, but she's a woman not a lady
I think the judge was incompetent by not controlling his courtroom and letting her spout contempt upon contempt. She ran the court and turned it into her soapbox. Shame shame shame in this judge!! That poor prosecutor. Did you see the pain on her face the whole time the judge allowed his court to be mocked.
@@carolmartin5599 One of the very weakest judges I've seen in 35 years of practice. He just can't deal with an unruly defendant.
You’re are confusing patience with incompetence. This judge had zero control over this hearing.
@@ThePolareyes53 Absolutely right. He's a timid, non-committal judge who can't control difficult defendants.
With other SovCits, this Judge has not let the minute-by-minute contemptuous interruptions continue. I believe he was allowing it this time to complete the process without further delay. There was even one SovCit case that was allowed to be appealed to a much higher State Court. I believe that one was also allowed so that lower courts could then cite the Appeals Court ruling that none of the SovCit jabberwocky has anything to do with the real world.
I cannot believe how much of her crazy he was able to tolerate, even engage. But I understand when you deal with somebody like that everything by the book. Her and her minions have been trying to bait him the whole way through and he has the patience of a saint. Go directly to jail and shut the f up!!!
well said!
There is patience and there is passivity. I think he crossed over into passivity after the first 15 minutes of this trial. It wasn't a good showing for him.
She’s accusing the court of having coached officers who’re against her, but she brought all of her comrades from the asylum, and none of them had their meds yet.
It's really annoying when judge Gauthier threatens her with contempt, then allows her to continue being contemptuous and to continue disrupt the proceedings.
By law he has to complete the process of each phase of the hearing. If you pay attention though, he allows her to fillabuster past offering herself to give testimony. He asks her if she has any witnesses (meaning even her) and she just refuses to give a straight answer and he moves on... but to be fair, she literally used the whole hearing as her testimonial grandstand time, she didn't need to give any additional testimony. But the judge wanted his decision to be "appeal proof".
He's a weak judge. No way around it.
@@Colgate64 Was that you without the teeth - clapping for the defendent? LMAO
@@RRRIBEYE No, I'm an attorney with 20 years practice in Michigan and another 16 years in another jurisdiction. And I say he's a very weak judge who can't handle difficult defendants.
@@LoneWolfUsul Appeal proof: well said.
The kids mom should sue Beth for damages. Mr. Lopez almost got sentenced to jail time. It would be on his record
She's quite literally force feeding him a conspiracy theory.
The real victims in this are the poor inmates who have to spend 30 days listening to her.
Why was she allowed to go on with her ridiculous disrespect!? That’s why they continue to do their crap, there’s no consequences!
Due process demands that the process is followed. He did the best he could and did what she forced him to do.
She caught thirty days in the pokey for her actions. If the judge had let her slide by serving only that one day she did, I would have been pissed.
You saw her being led to jail, right?
You are absolutely correct. And she had a court full of true believers who now are convinced that she's right and the judge had it all wrong.
In almost every other court this wouldn't have been allowed.
Empty vessels make the most noise, it's like Darrell Brooks all over again.
I made it to 4.31 play time and I’m OUT. I can’t deal with the sov-idiots
Thanks for giving it a chance. She's a particular pill.
@@LoneWolfUsul I love your work! 😊 Just feeling particularly anti-sovcit today ❤️
@@AussieWalkabout74 Sometimes I have to take little breaks from the sovcits and the frauditors. When it gets to the point I'm screaming at the monitor "shut the f up", I know it's time to step aside for a little while.
@@pamd.happykat8187 😂🤣😂
Look at the group of Karen's behind the prosecutor. Lolo WTF
If I was that judge, I'd give her another 15 days for interruptions in this court case.
Just 15?
15days PER OFFENSE, which means 2000 days in jail.
If they do a live action of Family Guy, I want this kid to play Snot. It's like he was born for the role.
I would hazard a guess that the prosecutor has never had to make her closing statement while a noisy defendant is disruptively walking around and talking to her supporters in the audience, but she did a great job keeping focus. I would have had to keep asking the judge to tell the defendant to be quiet while I was talking!
I'm sure the court officer is more than happy to FINALLY take her in custody.
And then she starts to argue about when to begin her sentence.
Just great.
No you're not allowed, and no its not a public space. How would a kids entire life be ruined by one single traffic ticket? Explain that, LADY.
The scariest part is she has people there who encourage this nonsense.
It might be difficult to see Judge Gauthier apparently allowing her contemptuous behavior...but by pushing thorough to the end, he ensured that this case is _done._ Note how he immediately told the peanut gallery that they could either shut up or be escorted out. He’s as decisive as he needs to be to get this over and done with.
Yeah, but it's still hard to watch her treating everybody like that, especially because decent people wouldn't do so.
I wish he WERE decisive. If he had been she would have been removed from the court room and the trial concluded in 1/4 of the time.
She brought the whole commune with her.
As for Mr Gilbert, he wasn't looking to leave. There's no way he was going to miss watching that.
I can't believe the Judge let her babble that nonsense for so long. Lady, get a better handle on the language before you try to use the grown up words like inalienable.
Giving her some leeway for her shenanigans is probably for the best in the long run. This way nobody can argue that she was censored in any way.
This judge is far and away more patient and tolerant than I could have been, or any judge I know.
Multiple people in sovcit movement pronounce it that way-they must believe it's more magical with their pronunciation; like lev-ee-OH-sah vesus LEV-ee-oh-sah
Also letting her friend chime in, what the heck was that?
AFTER all this BS, he should have thrown the book at her and sentenced her to 90 days in jail PER OFFENSE that happened in this trial.
That was so beautiful. Worth the 1 hour wait for that sentencing!
I will never understand these people.
This is the height of this woman's life! She wanted to be a lawyer but she didn't go to school. Hahahaha
That’s what I got out of this too lol
This judge was too patient, he should have never let her carry on that way. The woman was pure cringe and needed to be silenced and locked up until she came out of her delusional state. She needs to come to grips with the fact that as long as she lives in this country she is required to live by its laws, no exceptions.
Yes, sending her to jail is DEFINITELY the best way to fix her psychosis.
@@timbirch4999 She's not psychotic. She's a narcissist and a sovereign citizen to boot. I would have sent her for a competency hearing.
She thinks she’s starring in a Law And Order episode
Mental health evaluation needed!
6ft under for her ordered
This Judge is one of the most patient human beings on this planet. And just 30 days? He was easy on her.
Unleanable rights?
Sovshits love to put Liens on people and she thinks what she does and says are "unleanable."
What an excruciatingly dreadful woman. Thirty days was _far_ too lenient.
Her disrespect should have put her in jail until she could behave appropriately. Regardless of your beliefs RESPECT should be given. I wouldn't ever convert to or even listen to this kind of person simply from their behavior. DISGUSTING.
She should have gotten 30 days for practicing law, 30 days for contempt at the show cause and 30 days for the trial, served consecutively.
Judges in the US have no spine.
Funny I just said that above. She really only got the 30 days for contempt and that's it.
While I would absolutely love to see this lady do 90 days in jail for the disrespect she shows the society she clearly benefits from, like most things it isn't that simple.
Every sitting Judge knows the prison system is over max capacity and the per/capita amount of Americans incarcerated is extremely high for a modern western country.
Now we could discuss why that is and how to go about lowering it but it doesn't change the facts currently.
With this in mind, many Judges (not all) are looking for just about any reason NOT to put people in jail unless it is absolutely necessary.
In this ladies case what will 90 days in jail teach her what 30 days won't? She's just going to take up space which is at a premium. She's going to walk out of that jail probably more devoted to her pseudo-law than she was going in. She may be dumber than a box of rocks but she clearly isn't a violent person.
The longer a non-violent but dumb person stays in prison the more likely you are to actually turn them into a violent one.
@@Tryst1982 Ya, you aren't wrong. The US as a whole needs complete police and justice reform and that is just to start.
90 days in a psych ward for evaluation might be better but we don't invest in things that help society. It shouldn't be possible for people like this to be a thing.
Don't judge them all by Gauthier. Most judges would have handed her her head about 20 minutes in,.
This woman is or was a social studies teacher I the schools. It’s frightening to think the damage she may have done to her students over the years. Also how did she go off the rails this badly if she was educated enough to be a certified teacher?
Bet she isn’t now.
40:00 --You want to be careful! NEVER, never give away your inleanable rights! Only give away those rights you can lay flat, etc. 👍
"Maybe in the next 30 days she'll learn how to say inalienable." 😅😂🤣
OMG every time she mispronounced that word I literally CRINGED... if I had been in the courtroom I would have HAD to correct her and I WISH someone would have!!!!!! What a nut job.
I doubt she'll learn anything, 30 days or ever.
"Inalienable" is correct, but the Declaration of Independence itself says "unalienable." However, "unaleanable" is right out.
If you're taking bets, I believe she won't. I also believe she will be in the court house the same day she's out of jail and will target someone else's child. Surely this isn't the first time she's done this.
Every time she said that I cringed!! I was always taught that if you don't know how to use a word appropriately, not to use it at all! I wish she would take that advice!!!
Raise your hand if you just wanted her to invoke her 5th Amendment rights, to shut up and stop incriminating herself! For the love of love who created these monsters?
That judge is so nice. I saw another judge who just dealt with these sovcits by saying, okay, you aren't Kevin Smith (or another name here) and he has not presented himself. I will just put out a warrant for them and they will be held without bail. Done. There should be a sovcit law where them pulling this stupid stuff should put an aggravating factor on their cases!
They should just deport anyone claiming to be a sovereign citizen. If you won’t submit to the laws of this country, state, county, and city - then you can leave.
Omg! @ 1:00:51 the judge basically says EVERYTHING I’d been wanting him to say the whole time she ignorantly spoke! It was so nice hearing her grunts as he shut her down.
She has a very distorted view of her importance. She is rude, misguided, unappealing, and paranoid. She gathered up people on the street to support her and, at times, she even argues with herself. At no time does anyone interrupt her or talk over her, which she does repeatedly. There are judges that do not put up with sov cits at all.
A pack of wolves. A flock of birds. A herd of cattle. A squad of marines. A cacophony of sovereign citizens - or maybe an asylum of sovcits - help a brother figure this out...
An annoyance of sovcits!
It's more like a murder of crows
One of the goals of Sov Cits is to tie up and ultimately disable the entire court system, and they are so far being extremely successful with the first part of their plan.
I've seen a lot of judges who immediately shut them down. If a judge allows it, then they deal with it. It's the same rhetoric everytime, the judge should have a document showing his jurisdiction when they request it, then their only option is to appeal. Then the appelate court should do the same thing.
@@MrFriesz - Yeah, some judges shut them down, but the fact that they're even taking up a slot on the docket in the first place, and requiring time spent by the prosecutor's office and the probation office, and (until the judge allows the sov cit to represent himself or herself) the public defender's office, all chips away at a limited supply of time and resources available in the public judicial system. And usually it's for some crazy issue or violation that would never end up in court for anyone else _except_ a sov cit. They do it on purpose-- the movement is an organized assault on the judicial system.
The plan of too many of our elected federal representatives is similar.
Take office, purposely destroy the institutions they were entrusted to safeguard, and then squawk, "Look, the government is broken!"
@@dafterite Actually, they're just building up more case law for future sovcit crap to be more swiftly + clearly decided upon, where similar laws are broken and the same excuses are cited as legally relevant, when they are purely frivolous.
I love someone that wants to drive on roads but doesn't want to pay taxes.
They aren't 'driving', they are 'travelling'. Haven't you been listening to the drivel?
GOD BLESS THE COURT REPORTER ... I pray they paid her 10x for all times this woman was in court....
It's recorded. There's no one typing all this up, unless they order a transcript, and they will MAKE HER PAY OUT THE NOSE BECAUSE SHE MADE IT 10X LONGER with all her BS.
In-a-leanable what the actual hell 🤦🏻♀️
I can't believe they get away with this, nothing but disrespect!
Defendant wanted to get ruse out of judge and prosecutor. Ignoring some of her nonsense was a deliberate choice to keep trial moving.
Defendant wanted judge get mad and start yelling or for judge to react to each of her points.
Judge picked his battles.
I believe the maximum possible was 93 days in jail and a $7500 fine per count. Should have given her full jail time on EACH count, and ordered them served consecutively. Also should have assessed the full fine on each count. The judge was far too lenient on this disruptive nutcase.
I wish Judge Stevens from Texas could get ahold of her! 😂
Or Judge Bryant !!
Add Judge Jennifer Dorow to the list of judges who kept real coolness under fire from a real SovCit piece of work.
@mariehelena2364 she was such a pushover and she should have shut down DUURR-el Brooks every time he opened his dumb c**kholster. She should have known that Brooks had no chance of appeal, so she should not have put up with his antics.
@@KatzMeow268that’s what I was going to say 😂
“If I just say my magic words then Law doesn’t apply to me!”
I thought one was supposed to gain wisdom as they got older. This woman is so offensive and embarrassing. It is disgusting that she attempted to manipulate this young man's mind with her venom. Wow! I can't imagine going through life so angry.
She drank the kool-aid and sucked the sovshit c*ck too much. Messed up what little brain she had.
Australian citizen here - we have our nutters here as well but DAMN!!!! a whole courtroom of them - haven't seen or heard of that before.
They sometimes run a bus to bring supporters along
Please please please bring back crazy lady after 30 days when she's released.
She's got enough consecutive contempt findings if the judge wanted to push it that she could have been in jail for about 5 years.
Unfortunately, she's still out there pushing this idiocy.
I have to add to one of your on-screen comments. I hope it doesn't offend you because there's no offense intended.
"Ma'am, you are already in contempt of court. That ship just sailed."
AND THEN IT SUNK.
This sovcit lady is something else! They all buy into (literally, for some) this stuff and argue it with cops and courts. It never works, yet they still keep trying. At least it gives us some laughs!
Thanks for the great content and excellent work on your vids!
I'm over the age of 30 and I still get nervous when I'm pulled over.
I too have been wondering exactly what these "un-lean-able" rights are. LOL!
Thank you for posting this! Appreciate the giggles.
I think that the Sov Cit's don't understand what inalienable means but, since they all believe they can lien the police officers' (nonexistent) bonds they think the word is "unlienable".
15:45 -- She's not capable of controlling herself because she's **scared shitless** (as she should be, I might add) This is what happens to every delusional person who builds air castles grounded in fantasies...the second their fantasies (such as her grandiose fantasies of power and prestige) begin faltering, their entire WORLD begins to collapse.
I agree with you LWU, she should spend about 30-days in grey-bar hotel, and see if she changes her tune.
30 days in jail sounds about right. On day 29 she should be brought back to court to see if another 30 needs to be added.
To a max of 90 days total.