Buzz Aldrin Tries To Gaslight Conan O'Brien On The 1969 Moon Landing?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 19 июл 2020
- Buzz Aldrin talks to Conan O'Brien back in May of 2000 about the Apollo "Moon Landing". Conan tries to tell Buzz he (Conan) saw the moon landing happen on Live on TV with his family and Buzz refutes this saying that's not what happened yet it was broadcasted on television Live around the world. Was Buzz Aldrin trying to Gaslight Conan O'Brien? Is Buzz giving the game away here or trying to get out of lying?
Imagine going to the moon in 1969 but not having the technology to go back in 2021
Yet, they supposedly had the technology to alter live film taken on the moon, presumably, done back at mission control! ruclips.net/video/xqjk7d1OED4/видео.html&pp=sAQA Smart thinking, the extra memory saved by "ghosting" out the solid figures seen on their so-called lunar surface allowed the two to successfully catapult off the moon. The wonders of technology
We never went.
@@TheHeavensFellen I'll save you the trouble of researching the topic.
Due to the video camera and antenna bandwidth, Apollo 11's exterior video was slow, low resolution, black & white. It wasn't compatible with NTSC used in American TV and real time electronic conversion didn't exist.
*The solution:* The transmission was displayed on a monitor with a slow decay rate. A standard TV camera was aimed at this monitor providing the video that was broadcast. The ghosting was due to the interlaced scanlines, slow frame rate and slow decay.
On Apollo 15, 16 and 17, a high gain antenna on the rover allowed a remote controlled color video camera with a higher frame rate.
@Robert Thomas $22 Billion/year and NASA produces garbage imagery and spacecrafts a 5 year old could build. Come on.
@@QuestioningOurReality _"and NASA produces garbage imagery"_
I explained the limitations with early Apollo video from the Moon. You are overlooking the still photography and motion pictures (on film) from Apollo, which were often outstanding imagery, including Earthrise from Apollo 8 and Blue Marble from Apollo 17.
Since that time NASA has collected outstanding digital photographs (imagery) from unmanned probes, especially those sent to Mars, Jupiter and Saturn and the unprecedented photos from Hubble Space Telescope. So too images (photographs and video) of Earth from the ISS, satellites in LEO and DSCOVR.
The assertion about NASA using "images" and "imagery" to refer to what are not photographs and not real, amounts to equivocation and is nonsense. They are every bit photographs as digital cameras take or special instruments produce, like IR cameras that show heat loss from your house. They are not CGI unless specifically designated as CGI or similar, or if the use is obvious, as images _of_ the JWST before it was launched.
_"and spacecrafts a 5 year old could build. Come on."_
Can you build a Saturn V? The complete Saturn V-Apollo vehicle assembly was an engineering marvel in itself and for being created in less than a decade. It was an enormous project and very expensive.
The Lunar Module is frequently maligned. The insulation panels are mistaken for the body and the insulation value of the foil was increased by crumpling it somewhat. Further the LEM operated not on Earth but in the low gravity of the airless Moon.
The responses to the hoax claims can be found in a book _Moon Hoax: Debunked!_ by Paolo Attivissimo, also published at a website by the same name: moonhoaxdebunked followed by the same ending as RUclips's url. (If I post urls, the YT algorithm deletes my comment.)
“Not a bad line” almost as if it was from a script...
Oh I thought he said lie haha
@@charlotte4959 That's what I thought at first too LOL
@emmy lite LRO photographed the Apollo landing sites.
The amazing thing is that Moon landing deniers demanded later photography of the landing sites and when it is available, the goalposts move.
(Do you remember from when you studied physics in college, why this would be impossible with a telescope 238,000 miles away?)
People are stuuuuuupid
Keep drinking the Kool aid
NASA says they won't have spacesuits ready for use on the Moon by 2024, even after spending $1 Billion with 27 different companies over 14 years to manufacture them! Strange that, considering the suits worked perfectly on the Moon over 52 years ago...
The original design is very outdated. Just like cars, the safety specs have changed in the 21st century and NASA will no longer put people into suits that are just barely "good enough" to win a Cold War arms race.
Could you tell us some of the reasons NASA and the manufacturers gave for the spacesuits not being ready? Certainly you researched the topic rather than just jumping to personal incredulity.
Robert Thomas Why don't you explain to us how NASA isn't a hustle at $22 Billion/year?
did your father touch you down there when you were a child ?
"Not a bad line"
-Buzz Aldrin
They never went to the moon.
ruclips.net/video/xqjk7d1OED4/видео.html&pp=sAQA
Animation?? that is not what this NASA engineer in link above concurs with. Film that was intentionally altered from Mission Control, or, artificially crafted animation presumably done from mission control. there's not much separation between the two, yet both are far off from what they usually agree with.
So, did they ever actually go, yes, sir? or NASA?
NASA never went to the moon.
@@QuestioningOurReality Agree. Look at the contraption they supposedly flew in - lol
Keep drinking the Kool aid morons
There you have it folks !!
What you have is called confirmation bias.
What does that even mean? How can one Con their bias? You do realize the word CONfirmation has the word CON in it. If you mean that NASA is a CON and the moon landings are a CON, yeah that makes sense.
@Yobama Assassination or assassins has the word ass in it twice. Totally questionable because these alleged assassinations of government presidents and prime ministers are very suspicious. Do they even take place or they staged events with Hollywood special effects like the JFK Assassination Zapruder Film that has tons of editing, splicing and questionable imagery. I mean come on, why would a word that has to do with murder have the word ass in it twice?
@Yobama The English language is one of the hardest languages to learn. It's a deceptive language with how words are pronounced disregarding the sound of the letters sometimes. The English Language is a spell casting language. There are words within words by design and I'm not talking about anagrams. Words like CONstitution, BeLIEve, dEVIL, FLUoride, tAX, or ASSASSination. What about how some words sound out the word Hell, like Healthy, Hello and Help? You need to wake up to how the English language is nefarious.
@@QuestioningOurReality inglês é a minha quarta língua
someone gotta get BUzz really drunk and then the truth bombs will drop like 90 goin' north
man, the little easter egg hints these astronauts have dropped over the decades are definitely suspect
nice
Yep, America has never been to the moon.
No one can make it to whatever and wherever the moon is!!! 🌚
@@holayou2241 van allen radiation belt
Go watch the whole interview he talks about you being able to hear the radio communication because obviously when niel armstrong first stepped onto the moon there werent any cameras. After they landed they had a camera for the space walks and the flag but there was no way to live broadcast video footage of the moon landing in 1969. However there was animations to show what it would have looked like for the lunar lander to touch down onto the surface of the moon. So my point is we went to the moon and buzz aldrin confirms it in the very next part of the interview you quote mined this video from.
Are you serious? The whole staged moon landing footage is based off of cameras filming it including Neil Armstrong stepping on the fabricated moon surface. You can easily google image search the fake Apollo 11 Moon Landing and there were cameras involved in the magic trick.
@@QuestioningOurReality always check your sources and stay skeptical.
Ok so - devils advocate - if Buzz wasn’t trying to say it was fake here - what WAS he trying to say? Like how else can you interpret this?
@__rm307 It's been interpreted. Buzz Aldrin gaslit Conan on what he saw. Have you seen Astronauts Gone Wild? Have you seen Buzz Aldrin with that little girl saying we didn't go to the moon.
Come on with this...the guy has a reputation for playing games about the Apollo Moon Landings.
I've seen this video mant times and it never read quite right. It finally donned on me today. Buzz Lightyear said something that didn't make sense. Buzz said that Conan saw animation. There were no cameras on the moon to televise the event which makes sense. What didn't make sense was animation. In 1969 animation was done using drawings on paper. Animation didn't look real and hasn't until the last few years. No cgi or computer programs back in 1969. I wonder why Buzz here stated it was animation? I can see maybe filming in studio using filters to make it look blurring and fuzzy. Now if the moon landing was fake why did he play along? Was he even an astronaut? Was he an actor?
He is talking about the animations and simulations that the network news departments made to show during the live broadcast of the landing. The video camera was not set up on the moon until 6 hours after they landed.
Have you never watched the wizard of oz? That Toronto scene is so wild for taking place in the 1920s. If they wanted too, they definitely couldve faked the footage with CGI.
cool
Whuuuuut!
Moving the globe post
goal? post
More and more people are realizing this hoax
Watch the whole interview it was a joke to poke fun at people like you.
@@stevejackson9952 It's to keep sheep like yourself safely corralled in your pens of lies and deception.
@@stevejackson9952 Actually they were mocking gullible NPCs like you. Freemasons do this all the time.
There was no hoax.
Keep drinking the Kool aid numb nuts
Damn! Holy shit! Whoa! I can't believe this little clip is on YT! And that only 212 views? I was only able to stumble across it in link left in the comment section of another video. It should be VIRAL!. This short clip would once and for all put the final nail in the NASA moon landing hoax coffin if widely circulated. Hell, it would be the death knell for NASA altogether! Always knew Buzz Aldrin was doing everything he could to not betray the hoax he participated in. The poor guy's been in and out of AA rehab and mental institutions for much of his post-Apollo life. And I've heard him try to hint that it was all a hoax in other video clips. Obviously, all of those men were sworn to secrecy under pain of frightful repercussions if they spilled the beans. That's why Neil Armstrong remained a recluse for most of the rest of his life. No one should doubt the enormous courage of those men putting their lives on the line every time they squeezed into one of those hopeless experimental contraptions that could even fly on earth, much less the moon. But you also have to pity them for having to live that lie their entire post-Apollo lives. It's got to feel like "stolen valor" for them. In fact, the pompous American propaganda portraying as the greatest civilization ever amounts to a civilization built on "stolen valor"! That's not to say that we aren't an extraordinary country of remarkable achievements. We are. But so much of our self-image, as well as our externally projected image, is built on myth and outright lies, like the moon landings. Can't we still recognize the greatness of this country and its peoples without all the bullshit tall-tales and hoaxes? Do we really need to hold on to this Apollo fabrication? No we don't!...Great clip! Hope more people get to it.
Love it! Well put! Yes these men did suffer along with the thousands of men and women who were part of it that had to sign a confidentiality agreement. I know some lives it ruined. When you know things like this and carry it around with you it is poisonous to others. So sad and just for glory and wasteful spending. That's why we as a country are at a point like we are at. God help us come to reality!
Censors. - hippppp…
@@bettyc.parker-young1437 Good post, although it has been worked out that only about 200 people were 'in the know' that the actual lunar landings did not take place.
What was shown on mission control screens was footage of previously filmed landing simulations. A few years ago, an official at the time said that operators would not have been able to tell the difference between simulations and the real thing. He didn't admit to it being faked, but when questioned, did admit to how 'real' Earth filmed simulations appeared.
It has recently been discovered that many of the Apollo lunar excursions were filmed in one of the Cardington hangars in the U.K, at the time the largest enclosed indoor spaces in Europe. Certain details of it's interior can be seen in Apollo photographs when the backgrounds of the photos are enhanced.
If you would like to see many interesting articles by scientists and journalists from around the world, including cinematographers and special effects experts that the 'lunar landings' were faked, visit www.aulis.com
great viewpoint, balancing compassion with truth seeking.
You wouldnt believe this 3 yrs later there are still ppl believing they went to the moon..
Buzz gave a Talk at my school in Australia. I remember him looking right at me & thinking.. WHY you L👀KING at ME? (Is it THAT obvious I am a Nordic Alien Hybrid)
Here is the live footage that was broadcast and the animation that Buzz is referring to: ruclips.net/video/bDAunP8T5C0/видео.html
The video you linked to "The Simulation of the Moon Landing" is the staging of the moon landing. That's the movie set. CBS showed viewers the truth. Revelation of the method.
Most people understand that "ANIMATION" and "SIMULATION" are used to designate animation and simulation provided when real video was not available, which as you say, is what Buzz wa referring to.
Of course most people can discern the difference between the simulation set and the real lunar environment, how the astronauts move, the look of the spacesuits. On later missions most people know a hammer and feather don't fall ar the same rate in an air filled stage set on Earth and some notice the transparent exhaust of the real module lifting off.(It depends on the fuel and oxidizer used QOR.)
@@QuestioningOurReality Thanks!
@Robert Thomas Why is Buzz Aldrin talking about simulation/animation footage from CBS and ABC? Conan O'Brien is talking about the NASA movie set footage that NASA tried to sell everyone. Buzz is sidestepping so he doesn't have to lie.
@@QuestioningOurReality Conan was talking about the live broadcast of Apollo 11 Lunar Module's landing, meaning it's descent until touchdown. There was no television video of this, only audio. So the networks created simulations and animations to broadcast. There was a film camera capturing motion pictures downward out the window which were processed after Apollo 11 returned. There were never any exterior cameras of video or film capturing the LEM descending and landing, which is what most of the animations and simulations displayed.
So Buzz wasn't sidestepping anything. You are just weaving this into your conspiracy theory. It's circular reasoning.
The amount of common sense and scientific literacy in these comments is near zero.
For anyone actually interested in learning something: Buzz Aldrin is stating that no one actually saw them LAND on the moon because there were no cameras on the lunar surface. The world only heard their voices as they navigated towards the surface (and later video from a camera facing the pilot's window which shows dust as they land). A couple of hours later everyone saw Neil walk down the ladder via the remote camera attached to the outside of the Lunar Module. So, no one saw the actual landing but everyone saw Neil climbing down the ladder to take his first step.
If you think this clip shows an admission that he didn't travel to and landed on the moon then there is little anyone can say to save you from your own willful stupidity.
Bruh.....
Let me guess, you still have your little Saturn Rocket Booster model that you put together as a kid hanging from fishing line from your ceiling, right? Victor, more and more people around the world are becoming aware of this moon landing hoax on a daily basis. Research moon landing hoax instead of just dismissing it. Good luck.
so what was he talking about when he said "not a bad lie" 🤔
@@trizzspoety3887
He didn’t say that, he said “Not a bad line.”
He blatantly admits it on two other occasions.
There was no hoax. What Buzz is saying is that as they were landing there wasn't any live pictures from the lunar module, it was only live afterwords when they were walking on the Moon. That's why he said to Conan he was looking at animation. It was what the networks used to describe visually in a simulation what was going on. They never said the artists representation was real.
@JohnRedshaw That's not the imagery Conan is talking about.
Conan despaired like a grandmother
We went to the moon yall need some fucking brain cells
@bernardschmitt6389 Oh really so what's your proof?
@@QuestioningOurReality read a book, people have been debunking every bit of these conspiracy theories for 55 years. Also, from just a non-scientific common sense perspective, even Russia never claimed it was a hoax despite having every reason to want to.
@michaeldance4132 You're evidence for the moon landing taking place is... read a book....Wow...no lies in books...You can't lie with words on paper...
Why did he use the word animation.
Because that's what a majority of it more than likely was. Stop go animation. With just a little acting thrown in their. He refers to what he said as "lines" because he's an actor. All the Apollo boys have their own Hollywood stars. Like actually.
Animation was what CBS news and ABC news used for the live coverage of the landing. There was no live video from the moon until after the landing.
ruclips.net/video/YTC8YwihUsM/видео.html
@Dan Severns What are you talking about? The Apollo 11 moon landing footage we're give is laughable. Whether you call it animation or magic or cinema special effects, the technique used doesn't matter because it's a whopper of a lie.
@@andrewberg7100 I didn't know they had stars too..that is kinda weird. I can imagine it being real and fake so I just don't know
@@QuestioningOurReality what am I talking about? I was asking why he used the term
Buzz is right. Conan O'Brien watched "animation" recorded in a studio by NASA, not actual events as they unfolded. The astronauts did not record some of the key moments and the cameras were affected by radiation in some key scenes too, requiring complementary footage to be recorded in the studio afterwards. NASA is not hiding this, it's a well-known fact.
The footage was supposed to be aired once on an old 1960's TV set and not meant to be dissected in 4k on a 21st century computer, so it was deemed "good enough" for the period. There is no conspiracy.
Conan O'Brien didn't mention anything about seeing animation.
I don't recall NASA ever publicly admitting that this was shot in a studio. Please do provide links to this, if it exists
A good question coming out of that: what about all their other bloopers?
Conan O'Brien watched animations and/or simulations produced by one of the 3 television networks. The word "ANIMATION" or "SIMULATION" was displayed on-screen, though CBS didn't display it constantly during the Apollo 11 descent.
There is no conspiracy here. There was no external video camera to record the descent, and none used in the LEM. The astronauts were busy and radio bandwidth was limited.
I don't believe anything was recorded in a studio by NASA. Rather the networks produced simulations. Usually amateurish, it was occasionally comical - ABC's Apollo 12 simulation showed astronauts reading a newspaper in the Lunar Module seconds before liftoff. Not what the actual astronauts were doing.
The relevant network video from CBS and ABC is on RUclips. Notice "ANIMATION" or "SIMULATION" displayed on screen. So it's not a secret conspiracy or deception.
@Robert Thomas We're not talking about the CBS and ABC videos on RUclips with animation or simulation. We're talking about the footage that was given to us by NASA and the media that allegedly portrays the astronauts landing/walking on the moon. Are you aware of that footage or only the CBS and ABC simulation/animation nonsense?
I hope everyone here is trolling. I mean, come on! Anyone seriously thinking a 45 second sound bite pulled out of a 6 plus minute long interview leads to some conspiracy... SMH Your intellect has been ignored, just like the five plus minutes of interview you chose to ignore, in favor of posting something stupid for lols. Idiocy for profit.
So tell us what was so important about that 5 minutes of interview that isn't here. Please create a list of what we all missed that's so important. I will be awaiting your reply.
@@QuestioningOurReality Really now... that's like asking me to chew your food for you! Seriously?? I though 'do your own research' was a mantra of the bizarre skeptic
I'll give you the short answer, though. The important bits of that interview that aren't here... is the rest of the interview! The part(s) where he says things (not so cryptically) that suggest the LEM did land on the moon while he was in it. If you're willing to suspend reality because of a 45 second soundbite, it's very possible the remaining 5 minutes-plus of the interview might debunk your assertion long before it gets to your keyboard.
Unless you're presupposing, and actually 'want' NASA to be a hoax. If that's the case no one can chew your for you good enough to keep you from intellectually starving. So be it!
So basically you got nothing. That's what I thought. You have to appreciate the gold I posted from that entire Buzz Aldrin and Conan interview.
@@QuestioningOurRealityHe said he went to the moon, AND he said what we saw was an animation. there is no contradiction here that I can see.
Looks like some people just love cherry pickin.
@@jonnie106 nobody thinks it was a hoax just cuz of this video clip.... literally u know that, don't you? So why are you on here with your BS?
Watch the whole thing and quit quote mining.
What's your point? Why watch the whole interview? What does watching the whole interview have to do with what I posted here?
@@QuestioningOurReality simple you are quote mining in an attempt to decieve others. Always check your sources.
@@QuestioningOurReality dont just believe me go check it out for yourself.
Nothing, the man cleared his conscience while insulating the lie within the entire interview
What is quote mining? Did you make that up? How am I deceiving others? In what way? Always check your sources? WTF does that mean? Looks like you're coming on the comment section just to babble.
Y'all need some serious help. Get over it, We landed on the moon, the earth is An oblong spheroid, and it revolves around the sun.
@mtfgamma6257 Why do we need help? For what? We realize NASA lies to us and charges America $25 Billion/year to lie.
@@QuestioningOurReality🤡
@Kiwigucci NASA Fanboy alert. You guys are the clowns.
@@QuestioningOurReality Oops, I forgot Im talking to someone who has never had a single braincell to think critically once in his sad life.
@@mtfgamma6257 Do brain cells even exist? Your brain is in a cell? Also make sure to activate your brain cells to answer the questions I asked you over a year ago, otherwise you got nothing...