I'm so glad to see how there's a blend between real and computer-generated effects. CGI is incredibly useful for things that we can't reliably represent in real life but the real models like these make them feel that much realer
As a vegan I appreciate the amount of effort and skill put in by these artists and technicians that prevents actual animals from being hurt, killed and exploited. Thank you.
@@Lvcius It's not just about octopuses mate but other animals, their skin, fur and other body parts too. Those things need not be replaced by such props but they still ensure that no animal is hurt for those things as far as practicable which is why I appreciate their efforts. But still, method actors might even prefer to do it with real animals and may even ACTUALLY use a real octopus too so I appreciate that these artists bring such precision to their props that it eliminates the need to hurt animals. Chill brother. Understand the context. No need to be apprehensive about it.
Movie producers, to my knowledge, are never allowed to use real animal parts, not even claws, to film scenes. Everything must be made artificially. I’m not vegan but even I find that movie “boys” disturbing.
Definitely. I was about to make a joke about CGI seafood in Asian cinema, but let that be... Now, I still think animal actors mixed with practical effect shots is the best way to go. 4 come to mind that have stuck with me (mostly S. King adaptations): * more recently the zombie cat in "Pet Sematary" * the mouse in "Green Mile" * the rabid Saint Bernard in "Cujo" * the tiger in "Burning Bright" I know I know, once you learn about the sweet sauce the animals licked away after the shot it becomes funny, but still...
I just discovered these movie insider videos and I must say: so interesting!! I really enjoyed the one about how sounds for animation are made. These artists are so freaking talented! I wish I had even a fraction of their talent at anything at all lol.
It's a real shame that they spend so much time on these detailed looking props only for them to get completely covered up by the seriously fake looking CGI.
You seem like the sorta guy who thinks Fury Road used no CGI, and trumpets this "fact" in the comments section of as many movie-related videos he can find, hoping people will think he's a discerning film-buff.
@@fireaza Haha, not a guy and never seen Fury Road. So, nope! I think CGI is great in things like backgrounds or fire, but animals and people usually look pretty awful. Unless, we're talking about Jurassic Park or something like that. Those effects are still mind blowing to me.
I thought exactly the same. Those props look amazing. But the CGI effects up close are really unconvincing. You can see that no octopus tentacles are touching the face. You can clearly see where the contours brake.
Thank you for being an advocate for animals everywhere, helping share this vital (and fascinating!) information, Insider. Because it doesn’t matter how beautiful you are, if you are cruel to animals then you are ugly from the inside.
8:10 They should've got a real octopus and picked it up on camera as a reference. Because that octopus looks totally fake and it's mostly down to its movement.
So where did the PELTS come from? Lol I am First Nations, and years ago, we had a group of rich kids doing volunteer work in our neck of the woods, my aunt invited them to have Indian tacos and since we were already drying some deer meat. The kids were all really eager to try dry meat. They were largely vegetarian or strict vegans. But some, not all we’re willing to put aside their belief, understanding the meat they were eating was wild, and not raised in a cage. They were all for it, then I brought out a hind quarter that still had the lower leg attached with the hooves. Some were unable to stick around during the drying process because of that. Thing is nothing is supposed to be wasted, so we also utilize the hooves, and or dew claws. The idea of the feet being attached to the meat they were going to eat somehow disrupted their idea it being a fairytale I guess.
The word "octopus" is actually derived from Greek, not Latin. So the correct way to pluralize octopus in Greek is "octopodes," and not "octopi." But since "octopus" was adopted into English, the actual correct pluralization for octopus in the English language is "octopuses."
1:05 Painstakingly done, and when you watch it live, it is only 2 secs shot. For what!? Then again, if they don't make it realistic, when someone pauses the live scene in that moment, they would spot the mistake or laziness 😑
“No real animals will be harmed in the making of your movie.” 3:32 Just don’t think about the pelts, skin and feathers, I think they came from somewhere … or someone?
Lol I was thinking the same thing… I mean I am sure plenty of animals die naturally. But the industry has now shifted to animals pelts as opposed to exploiting an animal get hurt. It is more obvious watching old western movies.
What about in movies when they skin an animal. Some scenes are perfectly realistic. In the man vs. he skins a rabbit. If they’re not actually using a real rabbit I’d love to see how they do it.
Its funny how deep they try to make some things soo real while they could just use VFX 😂😂. About the hamster , i didnt even care or remember this scene until i see this vidéo now
"nobody can tell when the trick starts or ends" uhhh, I disagree. CGI is easy to see, and it is obvious when the animal is fake. I am impressed still regardless.
Of course its "easy to see" its a flying rodent. Its amazing how many geniuses say that when they know it is CGI. Take those same super observant wanna be pantomath's, sit them down with CGI animals without informing them, they say oh look at the pretty animals, and at the end, once told it was CGI and not real they go " Of course I knew it all along!" As kids we called them know it all's, as adults the term is usually "Wind bag!" 😂😂
Sure, "easy to see". Except for all those times there's been CGI right in front of you, but you were completely clueless and assumed it was a practical effect. Because you are not the discerning film-buff, one who is above the riff-raff that are so easily fooled, that you think you are.
Ignore the negative bozos in the comments...they're just trolling because they're probably kids that found out that CGI is used way more than they realize; and got their little "cinema magic" bubbles burst. Seriously though, it's a pet peeve of mine how cheap a lot of CGI looks, even in today's world of technology (one of the main reasons I dislike all these Disney live-action reboots ). CGI animals in particular always have a 'soulless' look and feel about them, compared to the real deal. I agree, the amount of effort they take to try and make practical effects look real (before plastering over it with CGI) is pretty impressive.
Oh really that hamster was fake when it was going ballistic? I thought it was a real hamster doing that! Lol jkn but for real like she had to explain that was fake
I was thinking about that irony too, but at least it's better to use parts of animals killed in more humane ways than torturing live animals to make these scenes
![Jack Harlow - Hello Miss Johnson [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q86_nlRoIGw/mqdefault.jpg)
I'm so glad to see how there's a blend between real and computer-generated effects. CGI is incredibly useful for things that we can't reliably represent in real life but the real models like these make them feel that much realer
What a phenomenal industry to work in!
The skills of these people are truly remarkable, real artistry.
There's so much hardwork behind a single shot.
movie magic
this looks so impressive how these craftsmen and craftswomen can make this realistic looking fake animals.
..yeah??
That's so cool!!!!! I'm so glad no animals were harmed especially that poor chicken puppet😥🐔
That squishy octopus reminds me of those sticky things you could get from $.50 machines that would "walk down walls". 😂
omg yessss!!!! i miss those
@@DanielleBaum I see those old machines in some malls still.
What friggin show is this hamster from? A live action super rodent?
@@DIDYOUSEETHAT172 The Boys
I bet they are made from the same materials
Not gonna lie: that Timothy scene broke my heart
If that octopus was in MCU, they'll just CGI it completely
Yeah literally
Poor Timothy! That scene was so sad 🐙😩
As a vegan I appreciate the amount of effort and skill put in by these artists and technicians that prevents actual animals from being hurt, killed and exploited. Thank you.
Yeah because they’re gonna put a real octopus in an actors mouth, right? Makes total sense 😒
@@Lvcius It's not just about octopuses mate but other animals, their skin, fur and other body parts too. Those things need not be replaced by such props but they still ensure that no animal is hurt for those things as far as practicable which is why I appreciate their efforts.
But still, method actors might even prefer to do it with real animals and may even ACTUALLY use a real octopus too so I appreciate that these artists bring such precision to their props that it eliminates the need to hurt animals.
Chill brother. Understand the context. No need to be apprehensive about it.
Movie producers, to my knowledge, are never allowed to use real animal parts, not even claws, to film scenes. Everything must be made artificially. I’m not vegan but even I find that movie “boys” disturbing.
I would be cheaper though
As an animal lover, same!
This is absolutely incredible, but you can massively tell the difference between CGI and SFX
Thank you… she really said no one can tell 😐
Definitely. I was about to make a joke about CGI seafood in Asian cinema, but let that be...
Now, I still think animal actors mixed with practical effect shots is the best way to go. 4 come to mind that have stuck with me (mostly S. King adaptations):
* more recently the zombie cat in "Pet Sematary"
* the mouse in "Green Mile"
* the rabid Saint Bernard in "Cujo"
* the tiger in "Burning Bright"
I know I know, once you learn about the sweet sauce the animals licked away after the shot it becomes funny, but still...
@@coolerthanafrieza4726 you’re more than welcome 😘
That "puppet" elephant can be used in other movies, so it's a good investment.
I just discovered these movie insider videos and I must say: so interesting!! I really enjoyed the one about how sounds for animation are made. These artists are so freaking talented! I wish I had even a fraction of their talent at anything at all lol.
It's a real shame that they spend so much time on these detailed looking props only for them to get completely covered up by the seriously fake looking CGI.
is your name Dunning Kruger?
You seem like the sorta guy who thinks Fury Road used no CGI, and trumpets this "fact" in the comments section of as many movie-related videos he can find, hoping people will think he's a discerning film-buff.
@@fireaza Haha, not a guy and never seen Fury Road. So, nope! I think CGI is great in things like backgrounds or fire, but animals and people usually look pretty awful. Unless, we're talking about Jurassic Park or something like that. Those effects are still mind blowing to me.
I thought exactly the same. Those props look amazing. But the CGI effects up close are really unconvincing. You can see that no octopus tentacles are touching the face. You can clearly see where the contours brake.
So dope,and more behind the scenes of the boys?! Yay :)
i literally clicked on this video bc i somehow recognized the octopus in the thumbnail as the octopus from the boys 💀😂
The Boys is such an awesome show
The work these guys put in very nice...then actors get the highest awards...its crazy
Love these looks at vfx
Thank you for being an advocate for animals everywhere, helping share this vital (and fascinating!) information, Insider. Because it doesn’t matter how beautiful you are, if you are cruel to animals then you are ugly from the inside.
8:10 They should've got a real octopus and picked it up on camera as a reference. Because that octopus looks totally fake and it's mostly down to its movement.
Justice for Timothy! He will be avenged!
It’s actually octopuses; octopus is based on Greek, not Latin.
I was checking to see if anyone was educated on this. Thank you 🙏🏽
I thought it was "octopi" for plural
So you're saying 'octopodes'? :D
You can use octopuses, octopodes and octopi
Thank goodness they put skin dimples on the hamster we didn't see
Cool video...that little hamster is just adorable 😍
Absolutely insane to see.
So where did the PELTS come from? Lol
I am First Nations, and years ago, we had a group of rich kids doing volunteer work in our neck of the woods, my aunt invited them to have Indian tacos and since we were already drying some deer meat. The kids were all really eager to try dry meat. They were largely vegetarian or strict vegans. But some, not all we’re willing to put aside their belief, understanding the meat they were eating was wild, and not raised in a cage. They were all for it, then I brought out a hind quarter that still had the lower leg attached with the hooves. Some were unable to stick around during the drying process because of that.
Thing is nothing is supposed to be wasted, so we also utilize the hooves, and or dew claws. The idea of the feet being attached to the meat they were going to eat somehow disrupted their idea it being a fairytale I guess.
The boys Special Effects are 😮💨🔥
The word "octopus" is actually derived from Greek, not Latin. So the correct way to pluralize octopus in Greek is "octopodes," and not "octopi." But since "octopus" was adopted into English, the actual correct pluralization for octopus in the English language is "octopuses."
NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERRRRD
1:05
Painstakingly done, and when you watch it live, it is only 2 secs shot. For what!?
Then again, if they don't make it realistic, when someone pauses the live scene in that moment, they would spot the mistake or laziness 😑
Can you drop an egg on a concrete floor without cracking it?
Yes, concrete floors are very hard to break.
now I wonder if the guy in oldboy was eating a fake octopus, because it looked damn real
Ohhh this is hours of work. Kudos!
The frog terrifies me. The hamster 🐹 though, ❤️
This was an Amaze N video. I enjoyed this and will share. I enjoy creative people. Creators are Amaze N.
‘The scene where Homelander forces The Deep to eat his friend Timothy.’
Too much vocal fry; bailed at 1:26
Another excellent video
“wrap the tentacles around an actor’s arm” or .. you know ... their legs and waist
Omg this is my dream job 😍
"Nobody can tell where the trick starts and ends."
Stoping right before he is eating the octopus very good job editor u missed all the action
I want that octopus so bad
That hampster was so perfect and chonk i lost my remaining brain cell.
Always been interested in this kind of stuff, thanks for your content ✨
That was very impressive 😮
Drink every time they mentioned The Boys
Luv these vids
octopuses* not octupi
Now children this is how we put hair on fake animals.
i saw the octopus mold and immediately knew it was the boys
"No real animals will be harmed in the making of your movie", just in preparation of your movie, cus pelt ;)
“No real animals will be harmed in the making of your movie.”
3:32 Just don’t think about the pelts, skin and feathers, I think they came from somewhere … or someone?
Yep exactly what I was thinking.
Fake fur and feathers is a thing, you know.
Yes!
@@fireaza They said Pelt. Not fake fur or fake pelt...
Lol I was thinking the same thing… I mean I am sure plenty of animals die naturally. But the industry has now shifted to animals pelts as opposed to exploiting an animal get hurt. It is more obvious watching old western movies.
WAHNSINN... was die Leute da zaubern!
Awesome, amazing and superior 🌍💯
What about in movies when they skin an animal. Some scenes are perfectly realistic. In the man vs. he skins a rabbit. If they’re not actually using a real rabbit I’d love to see how they do it.
Lol funny how they were talking about that BJ octopus 🐙 from the boys! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The boys: We can't kill love octopus! Let's make fake octopus!
Old boy: Hold my soju.
cool vid but what microphone did you record with, sounds like 1930's tv lmao
Wait a second. Those superhero hamster scenes were faked? And hear I thought you just had some well trained hamsters.
Freaking awesome
Octopuses
Juice wrld 999 🖤🕊
so they didn't use a real octopussy? 😞
Its funny how deep they try to make some things soo real while they could just use VFX 😂😂. About the hamster , i didnt even care or remember this scene until i see this vidéo now
Rip Timothy
"No animals were harmed in the making of these movies." (Apart from the ones who lost their skin, fur and feathers!)
Amazing
"nobody can tell when the trick starts or ends" uhhh, I disagree. CGI is easy to see, and it is obvious when the animal is fake. I am impressed still regardless.
Of course its "easy to see" its a flying rodent. Its amazing how many geniuses say that when they know it is CGI. Take those same super observant wanna be pantomath's, sit them down with CGI animals without informing them, they say oh look at the pretty animals, and at the end, once told it was CGI and not real they go " Of course I knew it all along!" As kids we called them know it all's, as adults the term is usually "Wind bag!" 😂😂
Sure, "easy to see". Except for all those times there's been CGI right in front of you, but you were completely clueless and assumed it was a practical effect. Because you are not the discerning film-buff, one who is above the riff-raff that are so easily fooled, that you think you are.
Ignore the negative bozos in the comments...they're just trolling because they're probably kids that found out that CGI is used way more than they realize; and got their little "cinema magic" bubbles burst.
Seriously though, it's a pet peeve of mine how cheap a lot of CGI looks, even in today's world of technology (one of the main reasons I dislike all these Disney live-action reboots ). CGI animals in particular always have a 'soulless' look and feel about them, compared to the real deal.
I agree, the amount of effort they take to try and make practical effects look real (before plastering over it with CGI) is pretty impressive.
4:25 sorry what do we get???
Can’t they use dead animals’ skin like ducks or something similar to taxidermy with electronics and silicone and other material to make them move?
7:49 8:00
Doesn’t the chicken in Nightmare Alley get disturbingly eaten too? Why is this video about things that get disturbingly eaten?
I don't know how to feel about this...
why are you always takin about "masters"? It´s mastersfx. which is quite a difference.
0:22: What are the threads in the actor's face for?
Imitating the octopus grabbing the guy's face with their tentacles
how would one go about making this a career?
4,54 go for the eyes Boo
Wow
The word is now octopuses, not octopi
So if no animals were hurt, where did the pelts come from?
I just bought a chicken head and body from the butcher shop for the movie I worked in. They we're eating it though.
Octopuses*
It’s not octopi. It’s octopuses. For real. 😂 sorry just had to…
Octopodes*
See korean movie 'old boy'
The narrator really said “you cant tell where the effects begin and end” that is such bullshit…
The "disturbing" scene looks incredibly fake to me lmao
*Octopuses
They killed a real snake in Friday the 13th
Damn
Why don’t they just use real hamsters?
Oww
Oh really that hamster was fake when it was going ballistic? I thought it was a real hamster doing that! Lol jkn but for real like she had to explain that was fake
tea
So they tried not to harm animals by building props, then covered them in REAL fur... Are you kidding?
How is using real fur hurting animals? Also, who said that fur was even real?
Lol
Too much unnecessary work for something I don’t care about when watching a movie
Disturbing? People eat raw octopus all the time
In that show, he can communicate telepathically with sea creatures, so eating one alive is a new level of horrifying there.
@@Milaaq302 Oh well I never heard of it
It's funny that they didn't harm a hamster for the prop, but they took fur from another animal. The chicken too
I was thinking about that irony too, but at least it's better to use parts of animals killed in more humane ways than torturing live animals to make these scenes
Thought that too.
I mean the take hamster can be reused and reshot as many times as needed since it's made to be durable vs a taxidermy hamster
Sad that its all about animal abuse. I don't get why this is entertaining, and I avoid such movies or series.
Better to use fake animals