@@goten3965"cough" madame web The amazing spiderman 2 Morbius, etc. That's just 3 movies lol while the games are almost always good They physically make the stupidest decisions when it comes to movies like the only thing that we have really gotten from Sony that's good spiderman movies is: itsv,atsv, and the Tom Holland trilogy
No I think wb steals the cake in that department they rejected both a Batman beyond game and a Batman beyond movie that was animated by the same ppl who created the spider verse
I think it's super dumb that people get mad at this. Don't you think there is a reason why it got cancelled? E.g. because there already is a super good Spider Man game by Insomniac, so why shit out a ton more game to create competition between their own games. Instead, Sony could just focus those resources on other great games. Also, the concept of a lot of Spider Man characters all fighting simultaneously seems pretty boring to me. The normal Spider Man's fighting system works perfectly without five other characters fighting on your side. And how would you make all characters feel unique without making the fighting and skill system extremely overcomplicated. How would you give everybody enough room in the story without making the game like 100 hours long.
Considering how much multiplayer super hero games have been failing lately I think this is just there way of playing it safe even if its a very small chance a companies goal is to satisfy the customer and turn a profit and this could have been the greatest thing ever true but it also could go the way of avengers and suicide squad and i think thats why they chose to back track on it the risk was there and they didnt want to take it gotta look at this from a company prospective not a fan one if I seen my counterpart games going south I wouldnt want to follow in there footsteps ether just saying i feel like from a business stand point they made the right choice but as a marvel and Spiderman fan it does suck but hey thats life 🤷
@@Punckmuckland they're already making two single-player story-focused games (Venom's Spinoff game, and Wolverine brand new game) the thing that people most craved about this past years (more story-focused single-player games about other heroes) And then people are mad that they didn't got a multiplayer focused game that would've use a multiverse concept, like that worked the last time, right? This game just has this much of hype bc it got canceled before Sony made any kind of bad decision. So it's easy to say it would've been a goat game, as much as is easy to say that it could've been a lame cash-grab spider-man multiplayer game surfing on the Spiderverse hype. But people are just blinded by the ideia of having a new Spider-Man multiplayer game made by Insomaniac, and are not looking the bigger picture.
Theory, they said they canceled it so that no one would continue to try and leak the game, they did this so they could make the game better because they simply had more time without having to worry bout leaks or fans asking when the game will release. But That’s just a Theory.
They cancelled a multiplayer Spiderman game and Spiderman 2's Carnage DLC's but thought that trash game was a better idea. They're absolutely allergic to money.
To be fair, if this was supposed to be made by Insomniac, we are currently sitting on a streak of failed live services made by studios with amazing single player experiences. They might have dodged a bullet.
Exactly this. Even if Great Web was a 10/10 game, Insomniac would have to convert a vast portion of their studio to Live Service studio for the support, continuous development and could potentially delay other projects like Spider-Man 3. I think this is the same with what happened with TLOU Online. Look at GTA or Elder Scrolls. The reason the next installations have taken so long to come out is because of the Online side of things taking up so much of the studio resources.
Yeap , i honestly didn’t see it lasting that long unless it was a live service , now that’s not necessary a bad thing cause there has been amazing live service games but I wish insomniac would rather prioritize story games cause they have been killing it , I wish they do a coop game down the line tho
@@redtedgamer8692 It's sad that Gotham Knights was a million times more faithful to the Arkham games than SSKTJL (which is a sequel to Arkham Knight for those that don't know). Gotham Knights only suffered from low funding, while the gameplay itself was straight-up Arkhamverse. Gotham Knights got slept on too damn hard.
As much as people bitch and moan abou Gotham Knights and suicide squad those games were extremely successful so maybe y'all should stop saying games are bad just because someone else tells you they're bad
To be fair insomnia just really doesn’t feel like doing a live service that’ll consume all of their time, and energy and have to continue to support for years to come. They are still a single player focus company than a live service studio after all.
Also, players would probably wait for the same budget, which was in SM1,2,MM, but that could be ending in microtransactions, which is not that cool. They are experts in single-player games, let it stay that way
Honestly that makes sense. Frankly I don't think the time is right yet for this game either tbh. After the spiderverse films are finished and insomniac does the last spiderman game though and does all the DLCS for it (Pretty sure it's gonna be a game trilogy after all, and I'm assuming story dlcs will follow for all of them.) And any other potential spiderman spin off games are done like Miles, THEN is the time for a live service game. Because then it would be the cherry on top for their spiderman games if they felt they were capable of properly executing it, and they'd have a lot more to pull from.
@user-oj7pm8rr2y but they didn't hype for it. The info on it was leaked due to hacker attack, if not for that, we would probably never know about it in the first place
@@BradyJones-x8b they never hype it up for it like the other guy replied to you, it was the continuation of the insomniac hack leak that they found this trailer, we probably will never know its existence without it
Dc did it with suicide squad who no one cares about had they made a coop JL game it would’ve been a whole different story n they probably would’ve released this game to be it’s competition
@@sammy_wills probably wouldnt work with how the game was made to begin with. most of such games are made to support live-service component, not other way around.
@@thealchmst Honestly, it's a lot of companies. Look at Hasbro and how beloved the old Transformers games on the 360 were, and they just tossed them, or EA with Prototype, or Sucker Punch with the Infamous games. There are so many companies with money printers that would rather just toss out amazing IPs.
Nah dude Sony lost their way long before Disney did, they found their way back with across the spider verse and into the spider verse yes, but they were doing nothing but failing for a while before that
@@Supergusy2000 sonys revenue is really not even affected by spiderman as much as you would think plus sony is literally making more money than ever its actually insane plus there reputation is better than ever after winning the console wars coming out with INSANE EXCLUSIVES plus basically every single spiderman product they make whether its games movies or animated films does phenomanally well most of the time winning awards or atleast getting nominated..... sony has literally been crushing in every single metric including reputation amongst consumers every thing they do is a hit....... but i guess ignorance is bliss or in your case ignorance is mald lmao
Tbh the only things in the game and movie space has been gow sequels and the spider man game and movies (not including spider man 2 it was nowhere near as big as gow or gowr or the first spider man game for good reason imo) ig getting a monopoly on western anime is pretty big for them though
Without taking into consideration that Spiderman had TWO massively successful games already... unlike the other two. Also WB Games seems to only choose the wrong options at every turn.
I'm not sure why you say that that game was going to be a live service game and insomniac does not make live service games so for them to make that game they would have been in a similar boat to that of rock steady with kill the Justice League
@@JohnDoe-ou7mqthe main reason why people hated those games was because of the gameplay, especially compared to how it was to previous games like Arkham knight. The gameplay for the insomniac spiderman games are already smooth and good enough where players won’t get bored of it so fast. But I don’t know how insomniac would keep the playerbase
I think people are forgetting we have had spiderverse games without the need of live service this concept could totally be done through single player but they clearly wanted to do it live service and the fact live service game like that have been failing is why they canceled it clearly the risk was to high what they should do is apply the spiderverse concept but do it like gta 5 with character swapping or shattered dimensions and edge of time it doesnt need to be live service and thats the problem
@@mattdoesntknowwhattodowith5760 no people are interested because its a Spiderman game a very popular character with a very big fan base that will look the other way on all the negatives until it actually comes out and all there dreams are crushed before them people at a time thought both avengers and suicide squad would be great to and we all seen how that ended now didnt we fandom is a powerful thing much like love in a toxic relationship it clouds human judgement and blinds us to what we dont want to see my opinion on this matter stands if done right it could be great but from a business stand point its very understanding why they would choose not to gamble on a possibility or hunch thats why I said I get where both sides come from but fans need to grasp all you will loose is a good game they will loose billions of dollars and risk bankruptcy there lose far out weighs ours by a massive amount so you should think on that before you criticize them just because they wont risk everything on a game you think you might be into just because it stars 1 of your favorite comic book characters you think it will be good but fact is you do not know that now do you why should they risk there entire company just to make you happy 🤷
@@mattdoesntknowwhattodowith5760 instead of demanding something that might have been a good game and risking never getting a Spiderman game ever again as a result you should be happy there choosing a path that guarantees you a good Spiderman game for times to come you should never wish for a company to gamble on its total destruction and applaud its choice to stay safe and keep good games coming out for years to come risking everything for a couple fans who dont understand the backlash that may follow is never a good idea might as well base your product a few pink haired twitter karens with that logic the turn out would be no different 🤷
Sony saw DC cancelling the Batman Beyond movie and said "how dare you try to be worse than me? I can do worse!" Edit: Apologies for fake news, it wasn't DC but Warner Bros that didn't pick up the movie idea and cancelled it
There was definitely a suit who was really pushing for this game to be developed and when they said no, leaked it to try and get the fans to pressure them.
I think everyone just goes "multiplayer game of Spider-Man would've made millions for Sony" without realizing that meant Insomniac studios had to work overtime on coding and on server maintenance for this game to be functional with a long lifespan.
Mhmm. Most of that money made would've had to go straight back into production just to keep the game on a functional enough state because my god we all know how people love breaking multiplayer games with bugs and exploits.
@@PardonSylver Heck just coding the thing to work, and rebalancing the combat system to make it fair, sounds like an awful amount of money that would not make bank. Especially when SM 2 still hasn't gotten that "greatest hits" achievement mark.
@@avery5920yes. Which is why stand alone freshly made multiplayer titles haven't come out for many years without using prebuilt servers. Please name a popular game that has come out that has multiplayer servers that it MADE. Because Minecraft ain't make theirs. And Roblox has bad servers. And both of them are over a decade old. So where's these games? The cod games still using the same servers since ghosts.
@@spider-man773that's exactly what I have been saying no one understands insomniac does not make live service games for one so they would have been put in a huge disadvantage. And seeing how badly those two games failed yeah it's a smart idea not to make a live service Spider-Man game 😂
I was thinking this could have just been like the ghost of Tsushima multiplayer mode, but for Spider-Man. Have missions, horde mode, etc. with all the different spidermen, would have been amazing.
A video essay highlighted that MCU has been very entropic/chaotic after endgame because they're constantly trying to setup franchises. All the "easter eggs" and random characters for future spin offs etc. They're sacrificing quality for the sake of pushing a new franchise and there's probably a strong link here
I would not have wanted this. Insomniac is doing great work on Spider-Man, as a single player story driven game. We do not need an online game where crap like microtransactions and live service stuff can be put in. I’m glad Sony cancelled this. Let insomniac do what what they are good at. Solo single player games.
The thing is both the issues you state are avoidable you don't have to spend money on microtransactions because dif skins do absolutely nothing lmao the most you would need is ps plus
This is the most garbage take in history. Online multiplayer can exist without subscription services and microtransactions. And people would have played it even with all those anyway
You got it all wrong, sony wants us fan to feel as miserable as comic spiderman to better understand his struggles and feel closer to our hero.
dammit its working!
atleast when sony does make something spiderman related its literally ALWAYS GOOD the games the movies and the animated stuff all prove that
They messed up badly on TASM2, story-wise (the actors gave their best, the writing sucked)@@goten3965
@@goten3965"cough" madame web
The amazing spiderman 2
Morbius, etc.
That's just 3 movies lol while the games are almost always good
They physically make the stupidest decisions when it comes to movies like the only thing that we have really gotten from Sony that's good spiderman movies is: itsv,atsv, and the Tom Holland trilogy
Bro coping so hard I can see it physically
20 inches of venom
😈😈😈
Now I want twenty inches of Carnage💀
I missed the part where that’s my problem. 😎
it can even grow longer~
Smash
"I'M JUST SEEING IF *YOU'RE ALERGIC TO MONEY*" Got me all boom
lol your effect didn’t work :P
" *Try like this* "
You need to space out these two * "
No I think wb steals the cake in that department they rejected both a Batman beyond game and a Batman beyond movie that was animated by the same ppl who created the spider verse
" fr "
Me when I talk to valve about portal 3
@@redarioo9249" like this? "
Concord: Sure, yeah
Spiderman: nah, too risky.
The great web might kill the spider man game series because it's too good and awesome.
yeah concord has bern in development for years and sony spent 400 million $ just for it to flop.
the way he said "pause" at "oiled up Miguel O'Hara" but not at "20 inches of Venom"
Venom is neither man or woman, no pause needed 🗣️
@@OVOJermey based
@@12DAMDO
Pretty sure being called a parasite is not based?
@@cryptarisprotocol1872you are unbased
@@OVOJermeyBut venom plus a man is a man
"I'm just seeing if you're allergic to money" is so based 😂
I’ve been asking if all the big brands are allergic to money nowadays. Pretty sure the first was Disney.
I really need to do this to the valve ceo. Why has tf2 never been ported to consoles ever again after the orange box
Lmao
Freaking WB sure is allergic to money.
I'm pretty sure EA pukes when touched by money. Lol
“Oh I’m just seeing if you’re ALLERGIC TO MONEY” Went hard
Bloodborne fans crying rn
I sometimes think they must be.
holy shit your a watchdogs fan?, kinda rare to find you guys
No yall just complain,have patience they will release it
@@Y3llowBone how is this in any way related to the comment?
*"20 inches of Venom"*
Considering his size, that's probably pretty accurate to what he's packing.
considering hes an asexual alien who is the one who gives birth, probably not
💀💀
We have the hypothetical, now we need to put this theory to the test 🤨
Put it to test is crazy
Put it to the test is accurate
5 months later, we found out Sony was too busy cooking up Concord. The flop of the year
I was looking for this comment
200 millions wasted to not make another spider man banger
You’re fucking right, shit we got shafted.
I hope you do know insomniac budget went into a venom, x men and wolverine game right?
No one cares@@RealCGH
I think in general companies are becoming allergic to money
Suits' salaries and bonuses come from investor's money, that's why they couldn't care less for actual revenue
They are allergic to money, but they want more moeny. Such a conundrum.
I think it's super dumb that people get mad at this. Don't you think there is a reason why it got cancelled? E.g. because there already is a super good Spider Man game by Insomniac, so why shit out a ton more game to create competition between their own games.
Instead, Sony could just focus those resources on other great games.
Also, the concept of a lot of Spider Man characters all fighting simultaneously seems pretty boring to me.
The normal Spider Man's fighting system works perfectly without five other characters fighting on your side. And how would you make all characters feel unique without making the fighting and skill system extremely overcomplicated. How would you give everybody enough room in the story without making the game like 100 hours long.
Considering how much multiplayer super hero games have been failing lately I think this is just there way of playing it safe even if its a very small chance a companies goal is to satisfy the customer and turn a profit and this could have been the greatest thing ever true but it also could go the way of avengers and suicide squad and i think thats why they chose to back track on it the risk was there and they didnt want to take it gotta look at this from a company prospective not a fan one if I seen my counterpart games going south I wouldnt want to follow in there footsteps ether just saying i feel like from a business stand point they made the right choice but as a marvel and Spiderman fan it does suck but hey thats life 🤷
@@Punckmuckland they're already making two single-player story-focused games (Venom's Spinoff game, and Wolverine brand new game) the thing that people most craved about this past years (more story-focused single-player games about other heroes)
And then people are mad that they didn't got a multiplayer focused game that would've use a multiverse concept, like that worked the last time, right?
This game just has this much of hype bc it got canceled before Sony made any kind of bad decision. So it's easy to say it would've been a goat game, as much as is easy to say that it could've been a lame cash-grab spider-man multiplayer game surfing on the Spiderverse hype.
But people are just blinded by the ideia of having a new Spider-Man multiplayer game made by Insomaniac, and are not looking the bigger picture.
😂 "I wanted to see you're allergic to money!" .
Lmaoo
@EpicGaming2000 how bro just quoted
@@mohamudhassan1113 huh wym?
@@GamingSportsNationyou gotta add a little summin' summin', otherwise it's just pointless repitition.
someone do this to nintendo i must know
It ages even worse when you realize they thought Concord was a better idea
they probably cancelled this because Suicide Squad and Gotham Knights did badly
The great web died, so Concord could fail.
And boy, did it fall, right down into the endless abyss
They were developed by different studios. They weren’t choosing between this and concord they were choosing between this and Spider-Man 3
I would love to unlock an oiled up Miguel O’Hara🤤
My guy 🍷🗿
@@senpai899 🍷🗿
@@Keaton_Wells🍷🌞
Oiled up Miguel bunda
Same 🍷🗿
Theory, they said they canceled it so that no one would continue to try and leak the game, they did this so they could make the game better because they simply had more time without having to worry bout leaks or fans asking when the game will release.
But That’s just a Theory.
A GAME THEORY
Honestly I'm not even going to be mad if this ends up being true that is probably one of the best ways to prevent leaks i can think of
"oiled up Miguel o Hara" 😂😂
"Pause"
@@AidenHerrick-z2wwe ain't pausen press ####ing play
“But you guys had such a potential here”
“For such an awesome game”
Thats his canon event from a different multiverse 😂
"Anyway, here's Concord! 🤪"
The game that didn't last 2 to 3 weeks before shut down? 😅
@aquariussarron5444 Exactly 2 weeks and it had a depressing peak player count
@@MaximusChivusliterally 8 years of development and at least $400 million, let me repeat $400 MILLION DOLLARS down the fucking drain
@@ectrogaming4200 The Morbius of video games.
They lost GOTY so badly they decided it wasn't worth it apparently.
They've cancelled so many good games that they could've made MILLIONS on
@@allnightlong0779millions aren’t good enough now, it gotta be billions now
Sorry but what does GOTY means?
@@Justify12 Game of the year
@@Justify12 game of the year
They wanted to put their money towards Concord 😂😂😂
“Instead of continuing the new spider man game we will release a game that will have a life span of 11 days”
Interesting fact a house fly at minimum can live up to 15 days
@@nathanwilliams585 HAHAHA. A fly can live longer than shit game. This fact made my night
Don’t be so generous I’d say a week at most
Facts! Noone liked Concord
They cancelled a multiplayer Spiderman game and Spiderman 2's Carnage DLC's but thought that trash game was a better idea. They're absolutely allergic to money.
*People waiting for the Bloodborne Pc Port*:
"First time?"
One day hunter..... one day
Bro ima prolly die before I can get a full pc experience of bloodborne
Im pretty sure they confirmed it to only come out on ps4/5 permanently
Yall not getting all our games
in 10 years we shod get it in emulators
That deadpan *pause* was funny asf
Honestly I would just play as Gwen and the oiled up Miguel ohara
"oiled up Miguel O'Hara" we don't want him
WE NEED HIMMMMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"I'VE COULD HAVE GET AN OILDED UP MIGUEL OHARA" Funniest line I have ever seen
To be fair, if this was supposed to be made by Insomniac, we are currently sitting on a streak of failed live services made by studios with amazing single player experiences. They might have dodged a bullet.
Exactly this. Even if Great Web was a 10/10 game, Insomniac would have to convert a vast portion of their studio to Live Service studio for the support, continuous development and could potentially delay other projects like Spider-Man 3. I think this is the same with what happened with TLOU Online.
Look at GTA or Elder Scrolls. The reason the next installations have taken so long to come out is because of the Online side of things taking up so much of the studio resources.
Sigh, insomniac my OG Rachet titles so good
Yeap , i honestly didn’t see it lasting that long unless it was a live service , now that’s not necessary a bad thing cause there has been amazing live service games but I wish insomniac would rather prioritize story games cause they have been killing it , I wish they do a coop game down the line tho
@@CD_DooooDAltcan’t forget resistance
@@KBorePCinsomniac wouldn’t need live service to keep the fake alive. TLOU1 online and TF2 are still played and aren’t touched by the devs
"We wanted to avoid a Gotham Knights 2.0"
_"Understandable, have a nice day."_
People need to stop acting like Gotham knights was the worst game in the universe. Gotham knights was great fun and had a good plot and good gameplay.
@@redtedgamer8692To each their own.
@@redtedgamer8692 It's sad that Gotham Knights was a million times more faithful to the Arkham games than SSKTJL (which is a sequel to Arkham Knight for those that don't know). Gotham Knights only suffered from low funding, while the gameplay itself was straight-up Arkhamverse. Gotham Knights got slept on too damn hard.
It had good plot and story but it had a shitty gameplay @@redtedgamer8692
As much as people bitch and moan abou Gotham Knights and suicide squad those games were extremely successful so maybe y'all should stop saying games are bad just because someone else tells you they're bad
"We at Sony hate money and are determined to speedrun bancruptcy as fast as possible."
“20 inches of Venom” 💀💀💀
Oiled up Miguel
🐟
hot
To be fair insomnia just really doesn’t feel like doing a live service that’ll consume all of their time, and energy and have to continue to support for years to come. They are still a single player focus company than a live service studio after all.
Also, players would probably wait for the same budget, which was in SM1,2,MM, but that could be ending in microtransactions, which is not that cool. They are experts in single-player games, let it stay that way
Honestly that makes sense. Frankly I don't think the time is right yet for this game either tbh. After the spiderverse films are finished and insomniac does the last spiderman game though and does all the DLCS for it (Pretty sure it's gonna be a game trilogy after all, and I'm assuming story dlcs will follow for all of them.) And any other potential spiderman spin off games are done like Miles, THEN is the time for a live service game. Because then it would be the cherry on top for their spiderman games if they felt they were capable of properly executing it, and they'd have a lot more to pull from.
Life's not fair you don't want to piss folks off? Don't hype up a game they want and then wrip it away
@user-oj7pm8rr2y but they didn't hype for it. The info on it was leaked due to hacker attack, if not for that, we would probably never know about it in the first place
@@BradyJones-x8b they never hype it up for it like the other guy replied to you, it was the continuation of the insomniac hack leak that they found this trailer, we probably will never know its existence without it
“Madame Web” Got Me there 😅
"Pause"
Nah resume, he valid
He won an argument against himself again
He speed running this shi
I do this daily 💀
Was there any doubt
Dont you agree with him though?
Given their recent shenanigans with Helldivers 2 I think they are.
What did they do?
@@CasshioBlocked a good portion of the olayer base out
@@CasshioYou require to have a PSN account to play the game now, which is restricted in a lot of countries
@@cxgameitout7040 they cancelled the requirement, but they never changed it back.
@@cxgameitout7040 You don't. They reverted the need for a PSN account, but the game's still banned in over 100 countries
Me, a Bloodborne Hunter.
"Get in line chump. Your gonna be here a while." *lights a cigarette*
sonny: nah, but do you want a remaster from a 2 year old game?
Their management learned from DC management
Dc did it with suicide squad who no one cares about had they made a coop JL game it would’ve been a whole different story n they probably would’ve released this game to be it’s competition
@@kairibrown5485 they would have made batman and superman carry guns
" I want oiled up Miguel O'Hara "
😂😂😂
... Same 😅 , also gwen 😅
40. Fully articulated. Feet. Of Venom.
Real talk though its hard to make a non-hot Spider-Man thanks to all that wall crawling👀👀👀
@@amog8202 pause
Wait i need more than a comma there, not also oiled up right?!
That frame of Gwen got me about to act up
O-oiled up Miguel O'Hara 🤤
"oh I'm just seeing if you're ALLERGIC TO MONEY" had me dead on the floor😂
Dont forget, every one of these sony projects that were cancelled were cancelled in favor of Concord
this was probably cancelled because things like kill the justice league and gotham knights didnt do well at all
The reason is simple insomniac doesn’t want to become a live service game developer
Then... don't make the game live service?
@@sammy_wills probably wouldnt work with how the game was made to begin with. most of such games are made to support live-service component, not other way around.
Unfortunately thats not an option, I have seen many people literally claim not live serves games are dead because they get no updates.@@sammy_wills
NGL, I won't blame them for NOT wanting to do live-service games.
< looks at Rocksteady >
That ship has sailed.
If spiderman 3 is about opening up to spiderverse, that would be based
My reaction when the mandalorian game was cancelled
There was a game!?!?!? AHHHHHHHHH NOOOOOO WHYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYYY
You HaVe PrOvIdEd CuRsEd KnOwLeGe, Whyyyyyyy
@@ZeFoxii what's worse is, it got cancelled for the same reason, EA didn't think it would make money
@ZeFoxii Yeah and for the time? It looked good!
I mean at least I’m glad that one was canceled why take a BIG GUESS, EA was involved and I don’t want to put money on them
Its like companys don't like money sometimes
That would have messed up a lot of stuff with the games they are currently working on dealing with next marvel games
People forget you can play as Miguel o hara in spiderman Shattered Dimensions
”It’s my IP to sit on and do nothing with!!!”
Are you referencing Konami? Cause it sounds like you're referencing Konami.
@@thealchmst
Honestly, it's a lot of companies. Look at Hasbro and how beloved the old Transformers games on the 360 were, and they just tossed them, or EA with Prototype, or Sucker Punch with the Infamous games. There are so many companies with money printers that would rather just toss out amazing IPs.
@@thealchmstno he’s referencing smiling friends
I think it's a line from smiling friends
"allergic to money" is honestly just such a hard line
20 inches of venom💀oiled up Miguel O’Hara💀
362 likes no replies, lemme fix that. 19 inches of venom is enough for me tho
@@NewAccount-w9b19??💀💀💀💀💀
Omg this is genuinely the most amount of like I have ever gotten on a comment, thank you all!
Disney had lost their way a long while ago. Now, I'm sad to see that the same thing is happening to Sony.
Nah dude Sony lost their way long before Disney did, they found their way back with across the spider verse and into the spider verse yes, but they were doing nothing but failing for a while before that
@@Supergusy2000 sonys revenue is really not even affected by spiderman as much as you would think plus sony is literally making more money than ever its actually insane plus there reputation is better than ever after winning the console wars coming out with INSANE EXCLUSIVES plus basically every single spiderman product they make whether its games movies or animated films does phenomanally well most of the time winning awards or atleast getting nominated..... sony has literally been crushing in every single metric including reputation amongst consumers every thing they do is a hit....... but i guess ignorance is bliss or in your case ignorance is mald lmao
Buddy, Sony has been like this for years
Movie wise, Sony has been dog water for years. Spiderverse is carry the boats but everything else is decent and at worst Madame Webb.
Tbh the only things in the game and movie space has been gow sequels and the spider man game and movies (not including spider man 2 it was nowhere near as big as gow or gowr or the first spider man game for good reason imo) ig getting a monopoly on western anime is pretty big for them though
Yeah you can tell he put his real feelings into this one big time"oh I'm just seeing if ur, ALLERGIC TO MONEY!!!!!"💀☠️
He said “Gwen Stacy and the other spiders” like he thought he was slick 😭
Exactly the one character no one likes or wants to play as ever 😂😂😂😂😂
He mentioned Venom, Miguel and Gwen specifically 💀
Yeah, they made Concord
They probably saw what happened to Avengers and what was going to happen to Suicice Squad and decided to read the possible righting on the wall.
Without taking into consideration that Spiderman had TWO massively successful games already... unlike the other two. Also WB Games seems to only choose the wrong options at every turn.
A multiplayer spiderman would smack!!!
“We could have gotten 20 inches of Venom! I could’ve unlocked a playable oiled up Miguel O’Hara!” Nah bro what 💀💀
You don't want Venom inside of you?
I WOULD HAVE LOVED MIGUEL LIKE THAT (he would’ve realized that not only spider men have webs😏)
wtf
cat (specifically that of watermelon)
#relatable
Watermelon cat.
You need to be locked up in Area 51 at all times
Sony gonna have to pull out the ukulele to make up for this
It's not Sony it's INSOMNIAC and they canceled the game mainly because of the hacker
"Oiled up Miguel" is insane 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
Legit afraid of money at this point😅😂
I'm not sure why you say that that game was going to be a live service game and insomniac does not make live service games so for them to make that game they would have been in a similar boat to that of rock steady with kill the Justice League
@JohnDoe-ou7mq but this idea still could have worked not as a live service but as a online multiplayer dlc expasion for spiderman 2
@@Playbo1J maybe
@@JohnDoe-ou7mqthe main reason why people hated those games was because of the gameplay, especially compared to how it was to previous games like Arkham knight. The gameplay for the insomniac spiderman games are already smooth and good enough where players won’t get bored of it so fast. But I don’t know how insomniac would keep the playerbase
When u actually want a live service superhero game.
no need for it to be live service just make it open world with multiplayer
I think people are forgetting we have had spiderverse games without the need of live service this concept could totally be done through single player but they clearly wanted to do it live service and the fact live service game like that have been failing is why they canceled it clearly the risk was to high what they should do is apply the spiderverse concept but do it like gta 5 with character swapping or shattered dimensions and edge of time it doesnt need to be live service and thats the problem
@@Assassin-ys5vwbut people are clearly interested in this because it’s a multiplayer game
@@mattdoesntknowwhattodowith5760 no people are interested because its a Spiderman game a very popular character with a very big fan base that will look the other way on all the negatives until it actually comes out and all there dreams are crushed before them people at a time thought both avengers and suicide squad would be great to and we all seen how that ended now didnt we fandom is a powerful thing much like love in a toxic relationship it clouds human judgement and blinds us to what we dont want to see my opinion on this matter stands if done right it could be great but from a business stand point its very understanding why they would choose not to gamble on a possibility or hunch thats why I said I get where both sides come from but fans need to grasp all you will loose is a good game they will loose billions of dollars and risk bankruptcy there lose far out weighs ours by a massive amount so you should think on that before you criticize them just because they wont risk everything on a game you think you might be into just because it stars 1 of your favorite comic book characters you think it will be good but fact is you do not know that now do you why should they risk there entire company just to make you happy 🤷
@@mattdoesntknowwhattodowith5760 instead of demanding something that might have been a good game and risking never getting a Spiderman game ever again as a result you should be happy there choosing a path that guarantees you a good Spiderman game for times to come you should never wish for a company to gamble on its total destruction and applaud its choice to stay safe and keep good games coming out for years to come risking everything for a couple fans who dont understand the backlash that may follow is never a good idea might as well base your product a few pink haired twitter karens with that logic the turn out would be no different 🤷
tbh this was probably gonna be a live service game.
Sony don’t make first party live service games, they focus on quality gameplay experiences
@@Scottisticavengers
@@sekiro7397 that’s Square Enix not Sony. It’s an exclusive sure but it’s not first party.
@@sekiro7397that wasn’t Sony
@@sekiro7397that wasn't sony
They thought Concord would do better than this? LOL
Sony be like, "we'd rather put money on Concord"😂😂😂😂😂😂
The term '20 inches of Venom' doesn't sound right 💀💀
Almost as good as " 18 Inches of messmer"
25 actually.
The " Whyyy " always hits so hard with these videos
Sony: should release a game about one of the most popular superheroes ever?
NAH!!!!!!!
Sony saw DC cancelling the Batman Beyond movie and said "how dare you try to be worse than me? I can do worse!"
Edit: Apologies for fake news, it wasn't DC but Warner Bros that didn't pick up the movie idea and cancelled it
Warner Brothers
the batman beyond movie wasn't cancelled it was never picked up
@@quintonheimannthat's arguably worse
@@g2.a6 how is it worse? DC saw the concepts and thought that they would be unable to do it since DC is mostly 2d animators not 3d
@@quintonheimann WB saw the awesome concepts and the reception the Spiderverse movies have and decided to not even bother.
There was definitely a suit who was really pushing for this game to be developed and when they said no, leaked it to try and get the fans to pressure them.
Bro when he said I’m testing if your allergic to money got me crying😭
Sony was busy making Concord 💀
Trueeeee. Lately it seems that big companies fumble massive cash bags oppurtunity on purpose.
Every time something like this happens a single tear runs down my cheek
People were gonna be TWEAKIN to gwen stacy 💀
Oiled up Gwen Stacy
@@crimsonraiderxv3422 nah oiled up Miguel O'Hara would be better
gyat
Thankfully we never ever have to play as that irrelevant thing
Anyone here after Intergalactic was revealed to negative reception?
gwen stacy lookin real bad in that image
The pure disgust on his face when he says pause
"We decided to throw this diamond in the trash to focus better on polishing this clump of dirt and stone"
Bad analogy. Polished stone can be pretty based.
I really would rather the standalone wolverine game and the standalone venom game over yet another live service game.
Calling Madame Web dirt is pretty generous.
@@pokemon05100 "Live, aka connect to internet and PSN to play this single player game." lol
This is Coyote vs ACME case but for video games
Not really. Coyote vs acme was fully made
This game was barely a concept trailer from my understanding
I think everyone just goes "multiplayer game of Spider-Man would've made millions for Sony" without realizing that meant Insomniac studios had to work overtime on coding and on server maintenance for this game to be functional with a long lifespan.
Mhmm. Most of that money made would've had to go straight back into production just to keep the game on a functional enough state because my god we all know how people love breaking multiplayer games with bugs and exploits.
@@PardonSylver Heck just coding the thing to work, and rebalancing the combat system to make it fair, sounds like an awful amount of money that would not make bank. Especially when SM 2 still hasn't gotten that "greatest hits" achievement mark.
Huh, actually thats pretty fair!
@@nexius4029 no its not bro you could say that about literally any online game actually braindead take
@@avery5920yes.
Which is why stand alone freshly made multiplayer titles haven't come out for many years without using prebuilt servers. Please name a popular game that has come out that has multiplayer servers that it MADE. Because Minecraft ain't make theirs. And Roblox has bad servers. And both of them are over a decade old. So where's these games? The cod games still using the same servers since ghosts.
Oiled up Miguel O’Hara 💀💀💀
The “allergic to money” thing totally got me. Well done.
That "Pause" was relatable, even though Sony isn't relatable.
They took away my Spider Gwen booty! I demand bloody Justice!!!!!!❤😂
You simps are always embarrassing kid
Thankfully we'll never have to play that irrelevant thing
Allat to release Concord is crazy work
"I COULD'VE UNLOCKED A *PLAYABLE, OILED UP MIGUEL O'HARA!"*
Truest shit ever
Exactly the fact that Sony thought that madame web of all things was gonna be a more better idea than this
I don't think it would be that wise to release this game right after Spiderman 2
espically after marvel avengers and suicide squad pretty sure insomniac saw the outcomes and scrapped it to avoid making the same mistake
@@spider-man773that's exactly what I have been saying no one understands insomniac does not make live service games for one so they would have been put in a huge disadvantage.
And seeing how badly those two games failed yeah it's a smart idea not to make a live service Spider-Man game 😂
Don’t forget Gotham knights. Had so much potential
I was thinking this could have just been like the ghost of Tsushima multiplayer mode, but for Spider-Man. Have missions, horde mode, etc. with all the different spidermen, would have been amazing.
And to think that they gave the green light to Concord😂🤦🏽
NOOOO, I WANTED THE 20 INCHES OF VENOM😭😭😭
Sony is allergic to a good idea
There are multiple rumors that are saying they only cancelled the game to chabge the name.
Please be this
"what are you doing?"
"Im trying to see if you are allergic to MONEY!?"
🤣🤣🤣
Concord “nuff said”
A video essay highlighted that MCU has been very entropic/chaotic after endgame because they're constantly trying to setup franchises. All the "easter eggs" and random characters for future spin offs etc. They're sacrificing quality for the sake of pushing a new franchise and there's probably a strong link here
Sony: we allergic to money
Ea reaction: said that shit again and i break your jaw
Stan did not die for this man...
Sony gonna cry if Disney let's other people start making Spiderman games.
There’s no chance of that happening over a the fact people are made a single player game studio don’t want to make a live service game
I would not have wanted this. Insomniac is doing great work on Spider-Man, as a single player story driven game. We do not need an online game where crap like microtransactions and live service stuff can be put in. I’m glad Sony cancelled this. Let insomniac do what what they are good at. Solo single player games.
The thing is both the issues you state are avoidable you don't have to spend money on microtransactions because dif skins do absolutely nothing lmao the most you would need is ps plus
This is the most garbage take in history. Online multiplayer can exist without subscription services and microtransactions. And people would have played it even with all those anyway
@@crazyguitarist94 ty that's what I'm saying
cant they just not put microtransactions since its not gonna be free anyways
@@crazyguitarist94 right.. but it will be like that
Insomniac and Sony made the right call
Game gets cancelled : We want to give you money
Game releases : How could they be charging us money
Those aren’t the same scenarios but ok
...what?
Nope
Game releases why is there a 250$ ultimatum version Sony?
We want to pay for it just not 70 fucking dollars there's the difference.
The “Pause?” right after 2 sus quotes that’s should’ve had a vine boom was funny
This is what concord took from us
Spider-Man would have turned on the same way