If it works it doesn’t violate or break the laws of physics, it expands it, and our knowledge of it. The laws of physics is just the human observation and our current understanding of it.
I hate these headlines- No engine VIOLATES the laws of physics- Warp requires antimatter and a temporal crystal- Dilithium. Antimatter requires Fusion reactors to make, AND, Dilithium is a cool Idea, but temporal crystals have not been found yet.
Something my physics professor taught me. The laws of physics are more like guidelines. Depending on environmental properties they can be bent, broken, expanded, and rewriten they aren't necessarily finite. You can't exist in 2 spaces at once; unless your a quantum particle. You can go faster than the speed of light but you can change the speed of light with gravity. Nature itself bends the rules all the time why can't we.
Should word it like this. Quantum particles can exist in multiple places while most normal matter can not. And yes nothing can go faster than the speed of light, how fast it is relative for you doesn’t change this. That’s not bending the laws of physics (because that’s literally impossible) both of these are just more laws that we recently discovered. Not breaking old ones if that makes since (WE CAN BE WRONG AND DISPROVE SOMETHING LATER but that’s not breaking physics, people were just previously ignorant to something) TLDR: the Laws of physics are finite, but what some smart human thought was a law can be found to be kinda off later
So it's like when Newtonian physics explained everything (at the time, pre-1900) until someone found that Mercury's orbit didn't behave as expected according to Newtonian physics. Then Einstein came along and said there's more to the picture. Hence relativity better explained what's going on. But Newton's laws are still laws tho. Newer laws are just like amendments to the existing law book.
A year later and it appears that the EM drive has been pretty handily refuted as a feasible means of generating thrust by experts. However, we also just recently successfully generated energy using FUSION so not all is lost!
@@paulrendell8797 yeah which is why we’d need light speed lanes to keep clear of debris or maybe we use the warp kind of travel, compressive space in front and expanding space behind along clear lanes
@@paulrendell8797 Getting to any high fraction of light speed is probably pretty unlikely anyway. But the interstellar medium - as opposed to the space around the solar system - has very little stuff in it, so it's more like "if unlucky you might hit some microscopic dust" rather than "you're hitting grains of sand." Some studies of this suggest that it's a bit of a problem if you're zipping about with a multi-kilometer wide light sail (big, thin target) but otherwise at about 10% of light speed some relatively light-weight shielding should deal with the sort of obstacles you are likely to encounter. Of course, this does mean you'll need a century or so to get even a fairly nearby star. Some propulsion designs especially those that can be built with a narrow frontal area and no need for big sails or radiators should be able to carry shielding sufficient for 20% to 30% of light speed. Beyond that, well, making advanced material technology and hardened electronics is probably actually easier than making the propulsion system and power sources...
I've come to a conclusion: Nothing "breaks" the laws of physics. It just works on laws we don't know yet. That's why science fiction often becomes science fact.
Not great wording and also not true. What you're basically saying is that literally _anything_ is possible. There are limits when it comes to physics. There's just no way to exceed those limits. The EM drive is one of those examples. It does "work" but it's useless because its limited. For it to actually fully work to its potential, we'd need to make it infinitely more inefficient. Physics isn't something that just goes "oh hey, ya sure ill make it possible" at the snap of a finger. Another notorious limit is the Hadron collider. Collide too many atoms and/or the wrong ones will create a black hole. Because of us humans, there are limits. If you are god, then the black hole's creaton means nothing, but because we're mortals it means certain extinction of the human race. In conclusion, and to put it less dramatically, anything is possible, though it can mean the extinction of the human race.
@@captaindave88 He's just saying we shouldn't take science and scientists as arbiters of truth, because we did that pre-enlightenment with religion, with priests. Digging into the science yourself is encouraged, seeing what scientists are talking about and understanding the intricacies and credibility of it all. Blindly trusting that they are right, and not digging into the empirical evidence, is exactly what we did with religion for hundreds of years. Dale here, I think, is saying we shouldn't do this. And I agree
The EM drive was confirmed debunked. When the test models were activated, they produced a small amount of heat which led to the materials expanding slightly. When researchers accounted for this effect, there was absolutely zero forces produced by the device.
Beat me to it, though i thought it was debunked because it was getting affected by the earths magnetic field. Either way this is a far cry from light speed even if it worked
To Bristen: That’s a Great question. Due to the almost unimaginable distances involved, space is considered to be relatively “empty”. But at anything like the speeds being discussed here, all you’d need is maybe a grain of sand, or maybe something smaller than that. The energy released in a collision would be immeasurable and annihilation would be total. Clearly that’s something that will probably be a completely separate field of study. But we should remember the old adage that if it can’t be conceived of, it’s possible.
According to Einstein, information cannot travel faster than light. To affect a piece of dust coming at you at near light speed (99.999%) by the time it is recognized & eliminated or moved, it would have to be done at FTL speeds (impossible). Good luck trying to visit the stars when every cubic meter of "space" in the galaxy has between two and six atoms of Hydrogen.
The title is deceiving EM Drive: "We built something that we'd never thought would work, and it still doesn't work. But if fairies exist, maybe it will work." Oh and even if it worked, it probably wouldn't go near the speed of light. Ion Drive: Not anywhere near the speed of light. Nuclear Drive: Most promising so far, but it's not developed by NASA
"It could be that all of this will be a waste of time and money." Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Some times you have to take risks and be wrong because if you try several ideas and one of them actually works, then none of the others were a waste if they led to something that works.
A famous quote from Thomas Edison (the guy who designed the electric light bulb) puts this in perspective. Edison said "I have not failed, I have just found 10,000 ways not to make a light bulb."
EM drives were debunked quite some time ago I’m afraid, the minuscule amounts of “impossible” thrust were caused by thermal radiation which isn’t self-sustaining, meaning you’d need fuel/power to continue the effect - defeating the object of the drive.
Actually they've eliminated the possibility of thermal radiation causing the detected thrust. However, they think they've identified what it is, it's reacting to the Earths magnetic field. As such, it's of no use for interstellar travel. On the other hand, it could be useful for satellites around a world with a decent magnetic field like Earth. Satellites often end their useful life because of the expenditure of all reaction mass. The EM could possibly eliminate that issue.
@@robertrosenthal7264 even if they've eliminated the possibility of thermal radiation, a drive using thermal radiation would still be useful in space some what. if you could find a way to make it work on solar energy then it should behave somewhat like an ion drive, only no need for fuel. that said you would still probably get little in the way of thrust.
If you wanna be successful, you most take responsibility for your emotions, not place the blame on others. In addition to make you feel more guilty about your faults, pointing the finger at others will only serve to increase your sense of personal accountability. There's always a risk in every investment, yet people still invest and succeed. You most look outward if you wanna be successful in life.
People who think this is impossible should remember that we went from depending on the wind to travel the oceans to nuclear engines in less than two hundred yrs
I do agree with this. As far as technology goes, the human race is basically advancing exponentially. I mean your iPhone is over 100 million times more powerful than the Apollo 11 computers.
The only problem is the math. something the size of a passenger carrier plane Moving JUST the speed of light is a mathematical nightmare I really hope we discover FTL travel but if we cant discover full depth physics ( if that's even a thing) then we're stuck in this star system and a relatively short distance out.
Made so many advancements now we stuck on iPhone waiting for next model we’ve slowed down and coming to a halt back to horse and cart when all oil is gone haha
“Do you think we’ll see warp drive in our lifetime or do you think it will be centuries away?” These two statements might not be mutually exclusive. Dramatic life extension is a rather significant field of study itself
@@majesticpbjcat7707 look at the research of David Sinclair, he's a leading lifespan researcher at Harvard. He has a very good and easily understood book that I highly recommend. It's what I want to research for my PhD!
I think warp drive is around the corner. We went from 25 years ago saying warp drive can never be made. Now it is on the table. So managing to get the power requirements within reason shouldn't be far off.
Physics has evolved in the past...it is evolving in the present... it will evolve in the future... man's understanding of nature has no boundaries or fixed laws... thats the beauty of Science... what Science has achieved in the past will lay the foundation to invent and discover more things in the future...
nah..take a good look at the world...take a look at newer generations of people.. we wont get far...we will die on this earth because wealth and power is more important than anything..we wont survive as a species for long...resources will finish at some point..or earth will kick us ..
There are two mathematically feasible warp drives at the moment, the "Alcubierre drive" and the "Froning drive" problem is both require "exotic matter" with the latter being the best bet.
"Ships that travel use fuel. Fuel has limits. Even fuels that are derived from solar energy have limits. Even fuel that is derived from nuclear power has limits. If you go too far, you cannot return. If your exploration takes you too far afield, you cannot return. If you enter an uncharted region, you will face physiological hazards and the possibility of entering another’s territory who could prove to be hostile to your presence. You certainly could become lost in uncharted territories, as many travellers have." - An excerpt from Life in the Universe, Chapter 3: The Limits of Space Travel. Very interesting read.
Remember if we get into high civilization the impossible is possible - scientific everyone is possible in the so far far far future but our god the creation hes thhe only one who an stop us
When the title says “breaks the laws of physics”, you already know that no one broke the laws of physics without even watching it. That being said, it’s cool stuff regardless.
Lol. I wish I could be a scientist. Give some Bs theory that sounds good. Collect the paychecks and take 4 days off on a three day work week. Than after 7 years say "nah didn't work"
Nasa is very efficient at consuming research grants, don't you know? Look on fameous James Webb telescope that is preparing for launch for over 10 years.
The faster humans realize Earth is where we're stuck for any foreseeable future and space is not a viable frontier the faster we might stop trying to engineer extinction. Too many idiots with no understanding. Even worse, as these two have mentioned, the EM drive was debunked.
@@815TypeSirius that’s the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard. That’s like saying a turtle won’t move if a bird is trying to kill it knowing it’s far too slow. It can still try and it may even make it out alive. Humans may never leave earth but we can still try because if we don’t try we will never know if we could. If we could leave but don’t we’d die from the suns death maybe sooner and if we do leave we may be saved
@@815TypeSirius we'll see if your "prediction" Is correct my comment and yours will stay on RUclips and if after 10,50,100 years the world will prove you wrong Humans have no limits of progress but there are failures in everything so there are in humanity So just watch
I love the hostile inability to comprehend what I am writing in the probably bot replies to my post. Please go take a reading comprehension class and then read my comment again.
Its strange how quickly technology accelerates, seems to be exponential considering just over 100ish years ago the Wright brothers were working out how to make short flights. And for hundreds of years before that we just wandered about looking up. I’m 32 now and I always wonder what progression I’ll see in my lifetime
Well, if it makes you feel better, technology invention and innovation happens at an exponential rate. The world's first supercomputer was made in 1964. 57 years later, our cell phones are 2 times more powerfull than that.
I love the part where it's like "it doesn't use any exotic energy, just requires [some magical and natural bending of spacetime that we have to find exists and catch a ride, like an ocean wave]"
Well, this is the Destiny channel. Forget who, but believe Event Horizon, perhaps Mr Godier's channel covered the MW Cavity testing. In testing, but, NOT currently useful.
I do not. I hope that humanity will not develop such powerful technology until it has matured. Modern humanity today simply is not ready for such power. We would destroy everything, and eventually even ourselves for greed and stupidity. Only once we understand our place in this universe can humans handle such technology.
Remember with all these advances and wants, we move farther and farther from our lives now, and as I am starting to see, there are consequences with are forward movement. For you young ones, I remember entering into high school and personal computers we're starting to be made available in schools, I remember the Apple 2 and the Apple 2E and then the macintosh. Back then all this was so exciting and great and very addictive , then I remember when the Internet 1st came round and was made avaliable to the public, good old AOL, 😝😆 So what I'm saying is in such a long time when the time I was born there was my online telephones there was no cell phones heck a pager was a big deal when I was young . I graduated in 1984 and thought none of these things would have a bad effect on society and only good would come of all this matter fact I was confident a 100% of it. Now I look at how the world is and how divided and stubborn everybody has become how harmful Internet and cell phones can be as we are discovering all these new downsides. I wasn't worried about global warming I didn't care I used wasted thru things away right on the side of the highways, it wasn't my problem. All I'm telling you right now is Exactly how I felt back then. All these big changes really came within about 35 years people that's not that long and what how much damage there really yes. At the same time I love the idea of AI and can see many uses. I also worry about how much truly downside there's gonna be from all that. How much of the core soul and humanity are we gonna lose in the next 100 to 500 years. I remember watching terminator and thinking how scary that was but it could never happen not a mine at lifetime. Then I remember I think in the nineties when I Robot came out and I'm like yeah there's no way we'll see that kind of devbut meant, but we're knocking on the door right now. With all these advancements the amount of diseases we have obesity all across the major developed countries how unhealthy people are, I ended up With crowns by the time I turned 20 years old but I've managed it. But what I'm wondering is what more are we gonna have to lose of what I feel is the core of what makes us order to get To that final point before what we hope is good. No I am told that I actually will be alive by the time the planet heats up to the 1.5ﾟ mark. Wow And I have to face that I know my son will probably be around when the global warming hits past the 2ﾟ I wonder what the world's gonna be like when I'm gone then and how much suffering there's really gonna because the turnaround isn't gonna be fast enough any longer from the modeling that they've done. So I'm gonna leave you with this be careful what you wish for and I truly believe there is such a thing as karma and it has a way of finding people. I don't want English it's to be around by the time we actually land people on verse, but what I want to be some of the 1st people to do that absolutely not I don't know why anybody would want to be the 1st to do it when there is a very good chance that none of them will ever make it back To Earth. I would miss the little things that we can enjoy here the sun on our face a cold glass of water for me Mountain Dew a sunrise sunset being able to paddle at Canoe and most of all eat the foods that I enjoy. I'm not ready to give up my movies, Or stop living my life the way that I enjoy now. Adventure is The key purpose to really living a fulfilled life but throwing it away on a barren plan it is not my idea of the Marvel and glory that we had when we made it to the moon and came back. I really do not remember it vecase I was only 6 tears old,lol. Enjoy your family and loved ones and your friends and make the most out of the time you have here because a year goes by like the blank of an eye.
Exactly. Perhaps physical reality .....also isn't the only reality. That just encapsulates what we 'already can' measure and observe. What else might exist that we are unaware of?
There are many issues with this video, but I want to point out two things: "almost no exotic matter" (or whatever the quote was) still is a MASSIVE problem because we still have absolutely no idea how to procure such stuff. Also, a warp drive would allow us to push past the speed of light; movement within space time itself is limited by the speed of light, but manipulating space time isn't.
@@dionysius1321 yeah, seriously. Like EXTREMELY, TINY, ULTRAMICROSCOPIC amounts. Antimatter is what, like $62.5 _TRILLION_ for a single gram? And you're talking about enough to move tons of metal through space? No, CERN is sooo not "pretty much" making it.
Also he was saying we’d run out of fuel in space but once you reach a speed and aren’t around any large bodies of mass you won’t need to produce any more thrust, you’ll just keep moving at that speed
Okay my one question since a kid with acquiring such speeds.. what about all the meteors and obstacles in space? Does the force of the speed make for a clear path or are crazy technological advances required to instantly re-route
The universe has cleverly protected itself from the rapid spread of humans by making fast interstellar travel extremely difficult. Pretty smart for a big load of gas and dust...
I have a better and simpler idea based on my observation that every time I eat spaghetti with marinara sauce on it while wearing a white shirt, some of the red sauce always manages to jump by itself from the spaghetti onto the white shirt. My proposal is to utilize the force that drives the sauce to the shirt to propel a spacecraft forward through the depths of the universe. The proposal is simplicity itself. Simply suspend, from a pole hung out in front of the spacecraft, a net containing spaghetti well drenched in marinara sauce while the nose of the spacecraft is covered with white dress shirts. The force attracting the red sauce onto the white shirts will propel the spacecraft forward indefinitely, especially if a means is provided continuously to replenish the sauce on the spaghetti and the white shirts covering the nose of the spacecraft.
I KNOW!! I saw that here a few weeks ago on another channel. They should do some very quick research to verify what they are talking about. The Guy or Robot has a great voice though! 🤡
I thought he sounded like Thunderf00t so I kept watching. But Thunderf00t completely calls out the Em drive and shows what complete sh*t it really is. We still can't break the laws of psychics guys! The Em drive would break conservation of energy, so I was skeptical from the first time I heard about it. Input always equals output! And just like "free energy" and perpetual motion machines it really doesn't work...
I think we'll see some pretty damn interesting propulsion tech in our lifetime. Not sure if FTL or even light speed is actually possible, I mean the fastest thing we can use now is light, and it would require 100% efficiency to go light speed while using light as a propellant... Some damn interesting things are coming though.
I love how varied the ideas are here in these devices. From solar sails which are simple, lightweight craft that “ride” a nearby star’s radiation to propel itself… ok reasonable idea. To engines that use exotic negative mass matter (that is only theorized to exist) to distort space time locally around a ship, allowing it to surf the fabric of the universe itself… I guess if you think about, that is no more crazy than the logic behind our current means of space flight 🚀 Yeah, let’s just ride a massive explosion into space, sitting on building-sized fuel tanks that will send a tiny craft no further than our own moon.
@@thirdworldrider6991 In my limited understanding of the concept of a warp drive shown in this video, the drive works by contracting space-time in front of the ship and expanding it behind the ship. We know that mass causes space to contract (giving us gravity), but what would cause space to expand (giving anti-gravity)? Thinking about it purely mathematically, a material that expands space and pushes things away from it would have a “negative mass”. I think the idea is that researches suggest that such a material is possible, but if it is, it is probably extremely rare in our part of the universe since we have not observed it yet (hence why they call it exotic).
@@matthewgumabon7498 a problem I have understanding mass and anti matter, is that we can’t really define empty space. What exactly is expanding? i think there may be more dimensions than we can perceive bc alone it does not make sense. In flatland, a 3D object moves through and appears to grow then shrink. Our universal perspective says the universe is expanding, but it might be missing more info than that
Yeah a big ship the shape of a penis .!!lola o and knowing big chance on absolutely never able to return .I guarantee nobody smart enough to design and engineer these specs are not getting on one of these point blank period.
Light-speed engines don't solve the problems of acceleration forces on the human body, nor running into debris that would disintegrate you instantly no matter how big is the particle you hit. Light-speed ultimately doesn't make sense... Unless you can alter your mass at the same time by interaction with the Higgs field, and also perhaps if you have some kind of "anti-gravity" that you could "project" in front of your ship that would "blow" debris/gases/particles away from you as you traveled through them. Charting from star to star might be simple enough, as long as you don't travel at full speed through the solar systems of any stars...
Going at the speed of light also means that u are also going into the future and the time on earth will be a lot slower compared to the people on the ship so it would be pointless to go at the speed of light in the first place .
The holy grail of human space travel is a propulsion system that can accelerate/decelerate a vehicle at 32 feet/second/second for an unlimited period of time....
@William and Romulans...but we already have a Space Force with a logo “really”” similar to the Federation symbol, or Motorola symbol. So which is it? Can you hear me now?
If we are successful making fusion energy, we can maybe have enough power to travel warp 1 for a few minutes, but if we had a Dyson sphere we could travel at warp speed a bit longer.
I really hope this becomes a reality in my lifetime. I’m not hoping for space travel to become mainstream in my lifetime, I just want ONE successful test of an engine that could get to mars in under 6 months. That would be amazing.
@@youngkeazy2806 the fastest spacecraft speed was 364,660 mph(achieved by the parker solar probe). with mars being at its minimum distance to earth it is 33.9 million miles. not accounting for takeoff and landing, at a constant speed of 364,660 mph it would take the probe roughly 93 hours to reach mars. all hypothetical with many factors not considered but possible
In March 2021, physicists at the Dresden University of Technology (Germany) published three papers claiming that all results showing thrust were false positives explained by outside forces, When power flows into the EmDrive, the engine warms up. This also causes the fastening elements on the scale to warp, causing the scale to move to a new zero point. We were able to prevent that in an improved structure. Our measurements refute all EmDrive claims by at least 3 orders of magnitude. Additionally, the Dresden University scientists were able to replicate apparent thrusts similar to those measured by the NASA team, and then make them disappear again when measured using point suspension.
or maybe thats what scientists in rival countries want their counterparts to believe...it doesnt work stop looking into it. when in fact it can work, and they want to be the ones to make it.
Yup but the only know way to do that is with physical mass and the amount of mass required to generate significant warping is near impossible to acquire...something like 10% the mass of the sun.
Yup technicly you wouldnt even be moving you would move space wich makes it possible to travel very large distances without experiencing time dialation meaning if you travel to another star and back the same time has passed on earth then in your spaceship without a warp bubble this would have huge time dialation effects resulting in paradoxes you would get back to earth maybe in 2 min but 200 years would have passed on earth
@@jerometruitt2731 not impossible the enegy requirements will go down b4cause 15 years ago they thought they needed the energy of the entire universe thats A LOT more then a planet the size of jupiter youll see in the future its not gonne take more then a jerrycan of that stuff
1:10 I might be wrong here, but: Because of how general relativity works, when one is going the speed of light, they reach their destination instantly from their perspective, even if an outside observer only sees them as going ~300m/s. This is the effect of time dilation, and it also means that if one is moving at the speed of light they perceive traveling 1m as taking the same ammount of time as 1 light year.
Even at subluminal speeds, hitting a peddle at a few thousand km/s would probably end the whole ships career. In orbit in this day and age, a piece of space junk can rip a satellite apart and they often only have a difference in speed measured in single digits of km/s or even a few hundred m/s.
@@rey_nemaattori With the warp drive, the ship isn't going fast, the ship isn't moving at all. The space around the ship is moving, he described the space as folding up in the back and down at the bottom. If this was possible, all items that would be in front of the ship would be distorted out of the space ships way. The reason the people inside wouldn't feel like they are moving is because they technically aren't moving.
Maybe they can create an atmosphere shield that will instantly Vaporise any small Debris in front of the bow . Replicating the effect of an object entering the atmosphere .
There was the Daedalus project, which never went past the design stage due largely to the fact that it used nuclear propulsion and it was designed at the height of anti-nuclear sentiment in the US. Apparently it would have been able to hit 12% the speed of light, which would have got us to Barnard's Star within 50 years or so.
@TRYP nuclear pulse propulsion is real, and it has been proven to work and if made large enough could very easily go 12% the speed of light. It is not very hard to go that fast and the only thing that limits us is cost
Recent testing of the EM drive ( not NASA) initially showed thrust , but when they ' changed " the configuration of support points. they could no longer measure thrust and ' theorized ' that it was some sort of thermal heating of the scale . NASA takes these kinds of things into account anyway .
It would be so funny to be like “alright guys time to test the engine” and it just vanishes. I know that’s not how it works but it seems like a funny plot for future cartoons or something.
"Aerojet Rocketdyne" is a great company name...It is like a 5 year old naming something. So if I asked my 6 year old to name a weapons company it would be "Shootygun BlasterCompany"
The moment you mentioned that it can somehow overcome conservation of momentum, I rolled my eyes. You've got to give up an equal amount of something in one direction to go in the other.
@@simm815 This is not our current understanding of physics. All sign point toward the fact that this is an immutable law of nature. In fact the EM drive mention in this video was debunked recently. It was leaking microwave that were warming up the balance, loosening the joints and thus faked a thrust. I know this doesn’t look like it, but this video is the steaming pile of garbage my friend
I think it is possible not to use the engine the whole time because of the fact a object flying in space can’t slow down or stop without artificial means, but not first igniting is not possible
@@simm815 Of course in our current understanding of physics. But the conservation of energy has been so finite that it is likely one of the few things that will not change because it is simply logic. To give something is to take something, if you give something and nothing is taken, there would be so many loopholes.
One thing that always bothers me about near light-speed travel is that if you hit a grain of interstellar dust at that speed it could be catastrophic. When you can travel faster, you can travel further. The volume you sweep through will be greater, and the probability of encountering a dust grain will be greater too.
We’re going to need some pretty impressive technology we’re going to need cameras good enough to see the grains of dust while traveling and we’re going to need AI to be able to calculate quick enough to dodge this dust
the laws of physics have never been broken, we just discover new laws and more accurate versions of old laws. I understand that this might be a bit much for a non-scientist to comprehend.
2:00 EMpossible Drive Fun Fact: EM also means Electro Magnetic drive. 3:07 2001 shouldn't look like 1901. That goes for 2016 (4:11) as well. We were live & definitely in color then. We're way past the black🔳, white🔲, & gray or grey pictures & videos of the 19th century until the 80s of the 20th century. So enough of the misleading presentation!
@@illicitlegacy3783 If our model can be broken, then it doesn’t match nature, and therefore not a “law”. So breaking a meaningless model, is not breaking the laws of physics.
No the term laws of physics is itself an oxymoron. Did you know that Dark energy breaks the law of conservation of energy. It turns out that all conservation laws is just an artifact of mathematical symmetry and they can be broken if the symmetry is broken. They should replace the term "laws of physics" with "properties of symmetry" because that is what they really are properties of a mathematical concept express in the real world.
C M But they are not laws of physics because the rare and specific scenario where this laws fail is still part of physics. They are laws of some physics but not laws of all physics. The laws of physics that cannot be violated can be violated that is textbook oxymoron.
Our discussion boils down to semantics. There are the real laws of nature, and then there are our models. That’s it. And oh don’t even get me started on dark energy and dark matter lol
It wouldn’t take you 4 years at light speed to get there, it would be instant for you if you traveled at light speed on the ship it would only be 4 years relative to the people on earth
@@OmegaF77 yes it's correct. But, when you accelerate to that speed time slows down for you. Travelling at light speed would effectively stop time entirely, so the trip to anywhere at light speed would be instantaneous for everyone on the ship, for anyone waiting on the other side, 4 years would pass before the ship arrives though.
@@ClySuva So let me get this straight. If I travel 299,792,458 m/s mathematically it would take me 1 year to travel 9.5 trillion kilometers. However, you're saying that by traveling 299,792,458 m/s, I could cover that 9.5 trillion kilometers instantaneously, and the light bouncing off of me would take one year to reach the viewer. That sounds like it violates the constant speed since I'm one year faster than light but also travelling at 299,792,458 m/s. That sounds like a violation of constant speed.
For heaven's sake, there is no "pushing off" anything, it's just Newton's law of every action having an equal and opposite reaction. Another way to look at it is that the centre of mass of both the spaceship and all the propellent it has exhausted hasn't moved at all, it's just as the propellent goes further away in one direction. The spaceship will go in the other direction such that the centre of mass stays the say. A simple scenario that's easy to calculate is to imagine yourself on an infinite friction less surface and you three a baseball. The baseball goes quickly in one direction while you in the other direction but calculate where the centre of mass is of both you and the baseball and it has never moved. Rocket propulsion just spreads mass out and it's just a matter of what spreads in what direction for the rest to go in the desired direction. Once you include other mass in a system such as "pushing off" something, calculate the centre of mass of everything in the system including whatever you so called pushed off from and the centre of mass would still be unmoved, likewise ifvthepropellent or spaceship interacts with any other mass. You have to include that other mass and whatever that other mass interacts with into the calculation and you will see that overall nothing really moved, it all just spreads out. The EM drive violates this as everything in the system moves in the same direction and thus the centre of mass of the system moves and this should be impossible. Keep in mind, although the experiments done with the EM drive shows a slight propulsion, it's well within the margin of error of no propulsion at all and is about the same as the propulsion you would get from one from a penlight shining photons in one direction.
There is one method that can accelerate masses without a propellent: gravity. Granted, gravity can not be used to accelerate space craft to other stars, but does provide a method to accelerate objects without a propellent. Perhaps there might just be another method that we haven't discovered. Another possibility is if the a constant like the permeability of free space can be changed locally which might enable spacecraft to travel with less propellent. Then there is a of course the option of slow boats: Large multi-generational ships (perhaps made out large asteroids that take thousands of years to reach other stars. If the goal is to populate other worlds over then next 10M years, that is very feasible.
Question? Travelling @FTL speed, how do you avoid space objects/debris, micro particules etc. that could potentialy destroy the ship? Would'nt you need a material that can absorb the shocks? Some type of shield?
we would need to design the ship with a large boulder at the front to avoid being hit with space debris and put heat shields, radiation shields to protect the people inside
Alpha Centauri being 4.367 light years away means it wouldn’t take 4.367 years to travel there at the speed of light in your OWN reference frame. You would get there instantaneously, but it would be 4.367 years later.
Are you sure? I thought you experienced time as passing at a constant rate for yourself, no matter how fast you would travel, but that you would see time warping in other reference frames and only other reference frames?
Definitely would be a really bad day, but in reality there is a lot of empty space. You would be able to navigate your way through, safely with the right navigating systems.
@@HP_RUclips-Channel That's not entirely true. There is a lot of space dust out there and solar winds comprised of charged particles being emitted by stars. This might seem negligible, but it becomes a big deal at extremely high speeds. We would need to invent some type of force field to deflect them away, otherwise they could easily cause damage to the ship.
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂 I love your avatar photo with that title We will eventually find a way to go extremely much faster than the Speed of Light. Just got to live long enough. May it be by planned experiments, or by accident we stumble onto something. I have faith in mankind... Even though, As of right now these fools haven't gotten the Magellan satellite into space just yet. (11/29/21) I think the first plans were for the Magellan satellite to be in space by 2018 🤔
It's just a theory, some theories end up being wrong. Also, the tech to build a theoretical drive may be out of reach for several thousands of years or forever unpractical/not doable. This video is a year old, even then the EM drive was proven to be a bunch of BS. Of course, hard facts don't really matter to the vid creator and most viewers of it and the commentators. Channels like this are the domain of basic science illiterates. This is a quick bux channel catering to rubes and nothing more.
I believe there is still a new mathematics yet to be discovered in order to understand space time . Our understanding of Science/ physics in general is still very young.
Possibly related to the Biefeld/Brown Effect, wherein given a high enough voltage, a capacitor shows movement towards the positive plate. Propulsion is proven to not be ionic wind, as this effect is seen in a properly charged capacitor that is in a vacuum.
I have the perfect answer for intergalactic travel - 1: Give weebs unlimited funds. 2: Designate a planet a dozen hundred lightyears away and claim it to be home of catgirls - innocent as virgins and frisky as vixens. 3: ???? 4: Profit.
I feel like they'd never get around to working on getting there because they'd all meet up and start collaboratively writing fanfiction about this wonderful new dream land they're going to reach someday.
Last time there was a serious breakthrough in rockets specifically it was physics we had already known before but were overlooked, what if this is the same situation 🤔
Funny thing is... Yes! Built with physics, math, components and manufacturing technology available pre 1970. The Mcgyver prototype, proof of concept prototype, built and tested in Feb 2021. Wasn't supposed to work. The first all electric Sub Light Impulse Engine is being built now. Once in Orbit, propellant is obsolete. This is the pre flight engine design. 3 maybe 4 months and everything will change. New company forming now, public announcement soon. Merry Christmas Douglas Renzoni CTO
Recently, Google has created a "time stone" with their quantum computer that's said to hugely advance our knowledge of physics. That would help in advancing warp drive technology, but even with that, it would probably take another century or two before a working model comes out. We still have yet created the technology required to hold the mass and power needed to make the warp drive work. Also there won't be any form of thrust when it comes to the alcubiere drive. Space time contracts in the front and expands in the back. In other words, space itself is moving, not the ship. Now you see why it takes so much mass and power to do that. Especially to make a literal physical "bubble" around it.
Seems like bull shit. The only warp drive plans I've seen involve negative mass matter. Quantum computers take advantage the properties that regular mass has on the quantum level. Any warp drive I've seen requires a hypothetical material that has anti gravity properties. There is no evidence of anything like that anywhere in the observable universe, and no one can even come up with a hypothetical way it could be made.
Time crystals and warp drives aren't related at all. If you'll remember the first law... Anything at rest remain at rest until acted on by an outside force and anything in motion will remain in motion unless acted on. Most matter follows the first part. The time crystals are an arrangement of matter that follows the second part. If you want to see a cool demonstration of a similar concept then lookup self synchronizing metronome array. Similar concept, just backwards. If time crystals help anything, then it will be in the development of an actual Mach drive.
Design is one thing, and actually building one is another.Government oversight would weigh any possible build to a halt.Not to mention a hundred other technologies necessary.
Nah theyd all fight for whoever gets rights to it then put everything they got into the research so they can claim resource rich territories in space first
I think warp drive invention is gonna be one of those things that is discovered as a result of a major accident. We'll be working on some kind of high energy generation project; something will go critical and boom! It will just then take us decades to figure out that the reaction could be used in a warp drive, and then it will probably take us decades or even centuries after that to harness and make the reaction useable for practical FTL travel on vessels. I just don't see humanity inventing something like warp drive with out blowing themselves and proto types up A LOT before we finally get it right and start to master the technology needed.
Whose to say they haven’t found and tried so years ago and are now slowly leaking the data . Just because it isn’t in your face doesn’t mean it’s not there.
Here’s the thing, the universe is filled with particles flying here and there. So, for a vessel to go faster than light would have to be made of exotic matter that has an infinite electron degenerate pressure to overcome the impacts of those particles onto the vessel. Not to mention also everything observable outside the vessel would be pitch black.
@@zo0ot404then warp it to create 2 "pits" in front of your vessel.. pulling your vessel towards the center of the 2 pits and whatever particles toward each of the pits. unknown yet of course if just the warping of spacetime would create a gravity / pull effect but hey, it's all theoretical discussion anyways
Thought #2, No matter what kind of engines that generate thrust are developed, the speeds they can attain will be limited to matching the speed of whatever is ejected from them to generate the thrust. So even if an engine’s thrust was generated by expelling say, electrons or photons, the spacecraft itself could only theoretically reach the speed of light, but it could not exceed that speed. Einstein theorized that as the speed of light is approached, mass increases to the point of infinity. That implies Impossibility, at least in that environment. The idea of warp engines is intriguing, but the concept seeks to alter the environment of space itself. Suppose someone- somewhere- has figured out how to alter the effect of the environment instead. Consider the laminar flow airfoil. It didn’t alter the environment, it altered its effect. Back to infinite mass. And FTL propulsion. Consider the effects of mass on gravity. Gravity can equate to acceleration. If unlimited mass can be generated and regulated, might it equate to unlimited gravity and therefore unlimited acceleration? Might someone, somewhere, with a background of thousands or perhaps millions of years of technological advancement have figured all this out? Might we, at some point? It’s certainly worth thinking about!
That is one BIG problem. Even hitting a speck of dust at light speed will go through your ship like the hull wasn't even there. Before you can even think of doing silly speeds, you have to devise some means of deflecting any debris you may encounter.
@@Tryst46 plus the human body is pushed to the limits at 300km/h that why jet fighters are heavily conditioned, what happens to the body at near light or light speed?
@@ltmoistlipsiii5387 Most of the problems with jet fighters are to do with manouvers that rack up considerable G forces. A commercial jet can fly at those speeds but their manouvers are very slow and gentle so they don't cause the G forces. When it comes to light speed, or any speed in a straight line for that matter, Acceleration and deceleration are the only real factors. But to prevent a human body becoming nothing but a mark on the bulkhead, acceleration/deceleration would have to be so slow that it would take weeks or months to complete. There would be no changes in direction, the ship itself would tear apart if you tried.
@@Tryst46 Thats a very good point however we would still need something that could take the stress at lightspeed, and idk still think people in a vessel going that fast would need some sorta statis
You’ve been to space and traveled in a vacuum, only in your deepest imagination, it’s called the impossible engine because that’s exactly what it is, it’s funny how they explain that push is what causes motion yet they invoke that “gravity” and why things fall is due to a pull, there’s no such force as pull, pull is merely a descriptor of something being pushed towards you, a pressure is needed to cause motion, no motion without push, all space travel is pathetic gibberish
About the Star Trek reference, The "Warp core" is just the power plant, the matter-antimatter explosions don't propel a ship. The ships have missive conduits, like a wiring harness, that move plasma from the warp core, to the warp nacelles, the nacelles do the work of "WARPING" space in front and behind it. The current idea of using matter-antimatter explosions to propel a ship are different from the idea used in Star Trek! The current idea of using matter-antimatter explosions is like the nuclear bomb idea, both are simple, set off explosions behind the ship, the matter-antimatter explosion would just be more efficient, because it uses 100% of the fuel. The matter-antimatter process in Star Trek is different, They use dilithium as a controlled environment for the matter-antimatter explosion and harness the energy as plasma, that is moved to the warp nacelles, (Think of a photovoltaic cells, this is some of what dilithium is facilitating), in which the part you explain miguel alcubierre's warp drive takes place.
Could it be that the answer is to not move at all. Space itself is moving and fast, so if we could find away of not moving we could surely travel great distances. I'm just a layman but that's a thought.
I think we should just create a black hole, and hang it on a string in front of the ship... Like the cartoons where they dangle the carrot in front of the donkey😂
If it works it doesn’t violate or break the laws of physics, it expands it, and our knowledge of it. The laws of physics is just the human observation and our current understanding of it.
@Ryan Pokorny Both were beautifully said
Thats what breaking and violating the laws of physics means... 😂 it means that it is more than we know
Facts
It's called figure of speech
If it expands our knowledge then how is it a “law”? Wouldnt that make it a theory? Or, a broken law
So in conclusion, NASA doesn't design near light speed engine that breaks laws of physics
Thank you
You saved me 11 minutes of my life
Thanks captain anticlickbait!
Thanks for saving my precious 11 minutes.
I hate these headlines-
No engine VIOLATES the laws of physics-
Warp requires antimatter and a temporal crystal- Dilithium.
Antimatter requires Fusion reactors to make, AND, Dilithium is a cool Idea, but temporal crystals have not been found yet.
Something my physics professor taught me. The laws of physics are more like guidelines. Depending on environmental properties they can be bent, broken, expanded, and rewriten they aren't necessarily finite. You can't exist in 2 spaces at once; unless your a quantum particle. You can go faster than the speed of light but you can change the speed of light with gravity. Nature itself bends the rules all the time why can't we.
Just kinda blew my mind there
Wait, you can change the velocity of light, not the speed with gravity.
Should word it like this. Quantum particles can exist in multiple places while most normal matter can not. And yes nothing can go faster than the speed of light, how fast it is relative for you doesn’t change this. That’s not bending the laws of physics (because that’s literally impossible) both of these are just more laws that we recently discovered. Not breaking old ones if that makes since (WE CAN BE WRONG AND DISPROVE SOMETHING LATER but that’s not breaking physics, people were just previously ignorant to something)
TLDR: the Laws of physics are finite, but what some smart human thought was a law can be found to be kinda off later
So it's like when Newtonian physics explained everything (at the time, pre-1900) until someone found that Mercury's orbit didn't behave as expected according to Newtonian physics. Then Einstein came along and said there's more to the picture. Hence relativity better explained what's going on. But Newton's laws are still laws tho. Newer laws are just like amendments to the existing law book.
@@alexrossouw7702 Very well stated. I like your "amendments" analogy a lot.
A year later and it appears that the EM drive has been pretty handily refuted as a feasible means of generating thrust by experts. However, we also just recently successfully generated energy using FUSION so not all is lost!
The added benefit of fusion power is its fuel. Water is abundantly available in the cosmos.
@@paulrendell8797 yeah which is why we’d need light speed lanes to keep clear of debris or maybe we use the warp kind of travel, compressive space in front and expanding space behind along clear lanes
@@paulrendell8797 Getting to any high fraction of light speed is probably pretty unlikely anyway. But the interstellar medium - as opposed to the space around the solar system - has very little stuff in it, so it's more like "if unlucky you might hit some microscopic dust" rather than "you're hitting grains of sand." Some studies of this suggest that it's a bit of a problem if you're zipping about with a multi-kilometer wide light sail (big, thin target) but otherwise at about 10% of light speed some relatively light-weight shielding should deal with the sort of obstacles you are likely to encounter. Of course, this does mean you'll need a century or so to get even a fairly nearby star. Some propulsion designs especially those that can be built with a narrow frontal area and no need for big sails or radiators should be able to carry shielding sufficient for 20% to 30% of light speed. Beyond that, well, making advanced material technology and hardened electronics is probably actually easier than making the propulsion system and power sources...
@@cald1421
I like that idea, not as a means of propulsion but perhaps enough to act like a plow moving debris out of the way.
The moment we finally test a warp drive craft that’s when Vulcans will make contact
😂😂😂
& announce it was really their blueprints lol
Still a few years to go. Zefram Cochrane will perform his first warp flight in 2063 I believe.
@@neilcronje1458 sounds about right lol
Yeah but didnt the world have to undergo a eugenics-based nuclear war first
I've come to a conclusion: Nothing "breaks" the laws of physics. It just works on laws we don't know yet. That's why science fiction often becomes science fact.
It also proves why statements like "trust the science" are stupid and dangerous.
@@dalehammers4425 its only stupid if you don't understand science.
Not great wording and also not true. What you're basically saying is that literally _anything_ is possible. There are limits when it comes to physics. There's just no way to exceed those limits. The EM drive is one of those examples. It does "work" but it's useless because its limited. For it to actually fully work to its potential, we'd need to make it infinitely more inefficient. Physics isn't something that just goes "oh hey, ya sure ill make it possible" at the snap of a finger. Another notorious limit is the Hadron collider. Collide too many atoms and/or the wrong ones will create a black hole. Because of us humans, there are limits. If you are god, then the black hole's creaton means nothing, but because we're mortals it means certain extinction of the human race.
In conclusion, and to put it less dramatically, anything is possible, though it can mean the extinction of the human race.
@@lacku2677 Science implies scientific method, reasoned scepticism and peer review. That's trusted science.
@@captaindave88 He's just saying we shouldn't take science and scientists as arbiters of truth, because we did that pre-enlightenment with religion, with priests.
Digging into the science yourself is encouraged, seeing what scientists are talking about and understanding the intricacies and credibility of it all. Blindly trusting that they are right, and not digging into the empirical evidence, is exactly what we did with religion for hundreds of years.
Dale here, I think, is saying we shouldn't do this. And I agree
The EM drive was confirmed debunked. When the test models were activated, they produced a small amount of heat which led to the materials expanding slightly. When researchers accounted for this effect, there was absolutely zero forces produced by the device.
That explains it. Cheers.
Yes I heard that too. This was about 5 months ago maybe 4. Its a drag for sure but true.
That was crazy.
Beat me to it, though i thought it was debunked because it was getting affected by the earths magnetic field. Either way this is a far cry from light speed even if it worked
So scientists have took first step for a long term project
To Bristen: That’s a Great question. Due to the almost unimaginable distances involved, space is considered to be relatively “empty”. But at anything like the speeds being discussed here, all you’d need is maybe a grain of sand, or maybe something smaller than that. The energy released in a collision would be immeasurable and annihilation would be total. Clearly that’s something that will probably be a completely separate field of study. But we should remember the old adage that if it can’t be conceived of, it’s possible.
According to Einstein, information cannot travel faster than light. To affect a piece of dust coming at you at near light speed (99.999%) by the time it is recognized & eliminated or moved, it would have to be done at FTL speeds (impossible). Good luck trying to visit the stars when every cubic meter of "space" in the galaxy has between two and six atoms of Hydrogen.
The title is deceiving
EM Drive: "We built something that we'd never thought would work, and it still doesn't work. But if fairies exist, maybe it will work." Oh and even if it worked, it probably wouldn't go near the speed of light.
Ion Drive: Not anywhere near the speed of light.
Nuclear Drive: Most promising so far, but it's not developed by NASA
Finally someone in this comment section with some brain texture
Yeah. When I got to the end I was kind of thinking the same thing. Wtf 🙄
Ion drive will work eventually and power future cars
You lost me at EM drive
Oddly enough I’ve witnessed ufo phenomenon teleport and I’ve seen two small golden fæ folk
"It could be that all of this will be a waste of time and money." Nothing ventured, nothing gained. Some times you have to take risks and be wrong because if you try several ideas and one of them actually works, then none of the others were a waste if they led to something that works.
A famous quote from Thomas Edison (the guy who designed the electric light bulb) puts this in perspective. Edison said "I have not failed, I have just found 10,000 ways not to make a light bulb."
A similar way of looking at it is:
Good judgement comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgement.
@@PanglossDr True...and marxist democrats have more experience at bad judgement but never seem to learn..they do double down however.
@@alantasman8273 way to make a non political comment, political. you out did yourself man.
Completely absurd and a total waste of time and taxpayer monies.
EM drives were debunked quite some time ago I’m afraid, the minuscule amounts of “impossible” thrust were caused by thermal radiation which isn’t self-sustaining, meaning you’d need fuel/power to continue the effect - defeating the object of the drive.
We've also have had people on Mars since the 80s
Warp drive may be possible but not the human body.....
Actually they've eliminated the possibility of thermal radiation causing the detected thrust.
However, they think they've identified what it is, it's reacting to the Earths magnetic field.
As such, it's of no use for interstellar travel.
On the other hand, it could be useful for satellites around a world with a decent magnetic field like Earth.
Satellites often end their useful life because of the expenditure of all reaction mass. The EM could possibly eliminate that issue.
@@robertrosenthal7264 even if they've eliminated the possibility of thermal radiation, a drive using thermal radiation would still be useful in space some what. if you could find a way to make it work on solar energy then it should behave somewhat like an ion drive, only no need for fuel. that said you would still probably get little in the way of thrust.
@@blakelantz9173 So, in summary, you're saying it could be, "somewhat", useful - but actually somewhat useless?
If you wanna be successful, you most take responsibility for your emotions, not place the blame on others. In addition to make you feel more guilty about your faults, pointing the finger at others will only serve to increase your sense of personal accountability. There's always a risk in every investment, yet people still invest and succeed. You most look outward if you wanna be successful in life.
Sure! Is a better way to counter this foreseen inflation, because all this wars everywhere are politics.
Living in one's "comfort zone" is a contributing cause to the plight of young people.
Fear is a total failure when you give up Ambitiousness; and Success is a game of dice, you throw your $coin while your investment decides your goal.
@@samiraabubakar2963 they said when you invest little money you earn big,
Can't even imagine how it is possible
We are getting ever more closer to discovering Xur’s next location
No one will ever know.
So close yet so far, what exotic are you hoping he has?
Is that a destiny reference?
@@alexanderh7135 perhaps
Xur will never be found
People who think this is impossible should remember that we went from depending on the wind to travel the oceans to nuclear engines in less than two hundred yrs
I do agree with this. As far as technology goes, the human race is basically advancing exponentially. I mean your iPhone is over 100 million times more powerful than the Apollo 11 computers.
@@Whoopdido777 Transistors went from being the size of your pinky to the size of a few dozen atoms. That's a lot of transistors.
The only problem is the math. something the size of a passenger carrier plane Moving JUST the speed of light is a mathematical nightmare I really hope we discover FTL travel but if we cant discover full depth physics ( if that's even a thing) then we're stuck in this star system and a relatively short distance out.
@@tristintaylor7999 Not just speed but also ways to shield from solar radiation and will have to have somekind of artificial gravity for long trips
Made so many advancements now we stuck on iPhone waiting for next model we’ve slowed down and coming to a halt back to horse and cart when all oil is gone haha
“Do you think we’ll see warp drive in our lifetime or do you think it will be centuries away?” These two statements might not be mutually exclusive. Dramatic life extension is a rather significant field of study itself
I'd definitely like to know more about that. Do you know where I can look to find more info on life extension?
Or, where's the best and must pertinent info?
Humans used to live hundreds of years, question is what happened to our DNA and "Junk" DNA
@@majesticpbjcat7707classified Codename: Project Ibis and the Emerald Rooms. That is what the Cabal use for bio-regenesis
@@majesticpbjcat7707 look at the research of David Sinclair, he's a leading lifespan researcher at Harvard. He has a very good and easily understood book that I highly recommend. It's what I want to research for my PhD!
I think warp drive is around the corner. We went from 25 years ago saying warp drive can never be made. Now it is on the table. So managing to get the power requirements within reason shouldn't be far off.
Physics has evolved in the past...it is evolving in the present... it will evolve in the future... man's understanding of nature has no boundaries or fixed laws... thats the beauty of Science... what Science has achieved in the past will lay the foundation to invent and discover more things in the future...
bla bla bla but nobody dares
nah..take a good look at the world...take a look at newer generations of people.. we wont get far...we will die on this earth because wealth and power is more important than anything..we wont survive as a species for long...resources will finish at some point..or earth will kick us ..
True
@John Johnson Where we're going we won't need toilets.
@Maggie Smith lol you're definitely not focused at all.
This video should be titled "When someone who doesn't know what their talking about makes a video about propulsion"
So true
I need TP for my bung-hole!
@@wrd2thebigbird cringed at some correcting English
@@wrd2thebigbird cringe
@@sully9832
I don't think we will see warp drive in our lifetime, but if that happens that would be phenomenal.
It would be phenomenal indeed, brother
It possible
We can built but the moneyy.💀
There are two mathematically feasible warp drives at the moment, the "Alcubierre drive" and the "Froning drive" problem is both require "exotic matter" with the latter being the best bet.
I already seen warp drive it happen n front of my eyes at night and there called UFO's
I love how the stock video of someone doing trig on a board is seen as complex.
"Ships that travel use fuel. Fuel has limits. Even fuels that are derived from solar energy have limits. Even fuel that is derived from nuclear power has limits. If you go too far, you cannot return. If your exploration takes you too far afield, you cannot return. If you enter an uncharted region, you will face physiological hazards and the possibility of entering another’s territory who could prove to be hostile to your presence. You certainly could become lost in uncharted territories, as many travellers have." - An excerpt from Life in the Universe, Chapter 3: The Limits of Space Travel. Very interesting read.
Ty!
Oh wow
Thank you, Stojan.
Awesome going to grab this book
Remember if we get into high civilization the impossible is possible - scientific everyone is possible in the so far far far future but our god the creation hes thhe only one who an stop us
I can't wait for the day I will be able to say "punch it chewie" and just travel 10 lightyears in a matter of minutes
Shiiittt....dont have the parts for that yet!
I dont think the particles of our body could handle that 🤔
@Nat20 Damage never say never🥴
Light years means it took light a year to reach there so naaah not in minutes bro
you’ll be dead by then
When the title says “breaks the laws of physics”, you already know that no one broke the laws of physics without even watching it. That being said, it’s cool stuff regardless.
Fact
The title says “designs”, not “created”, just sayin’…
Yes
No one knows how it works, and it doesn't work. That says it all for this video.
Laws of physics are nothing but a bunch of man made “rules” rules that have been broken multiple time
Im excited to see this incredible progress of mankind happening right before our eyes.
"E M Drive failed to produce any thrust", it was however very efficient at consuming research grants.
Physicist used confusion. It was very effective
Lol. I wish I could be a scientist. Give some Bs theory that sounds good. Collect the paychecks and take 4 days off on a three day work week. Than after 7 years say "nah didn't work"
Nasa is very efficient at consuming research grants, don't you know? Look on fameous James Webb telescope that is preparing for launch for over 10 years.
@@konradzuk9661 Still not as bad as the military
Wasn't it originally designed by Chinese researchers?
As I recall, the EM drive was already disproved. All it was doing is producing waste heat and expanding giving an error reading.
It was, in 2018. It was magnetic interference from unshielded wires.
The faster humans realize Earth is where we're stuck for any foreseeable future and space is not a viable frontier the faster we might stop trying to engineer extinction. Too many idiots with no understanding. Even worse, as these two have mentioned, the EM drive was debunked.
@@815TypeSirius that’s the stupidest shit I’ve ever heard. That’s like saying a turtle won’t move if a bird is trying to kill it knowing it’s far too slow. It can still try and it may even make it out alive. Humans may never leave earth but we can still try because if we don’t try we will never know if we could. If we could leave but don’t we’d die from the suns death maybe sooner and if we do leave we may be saved
@@815TypeSirius we'll see if your "prediction" Is correct my comment and yours will stay on RUclips and if after 10,50,100 years the world will prove you wrong
Humans have no limits of progress but there are failures in everything so there are in humanity
So just watch
I love the hostile inability to comprehend what I am writing in the probably bot replies to my post. Please go take a reading comprehension class and then read my comment again.
When her parents aren’t home and she lives in Alpha Centauri.
🤣🤣👍🏽
🤣🤣👍🏽
*We'll Be Right Back.....*
./
@@pubert2024 .//
Why is the picture from 2001 black and white? 3:06
I even used to see in black n white in 2001.
Its strange how quickly technology accelerates, seems to be exponential considering just over 100ish years ago the Wright brothers were working out how to make short flights. And for hundreds of years before that we just wandered about looking up.
I’m 32 now and I always wonder what progression I’ll see in my lifetime
I'm 36 I also hope I see some kind of break through before I'm gone would be awesome . The space topic has also been a fun subject for me 👽
Well, if it makes you feel better, technology invention and innovation happens at an exponential rate. The world's first supercomputer was made in 1964. 57 years later, our cell phones are 2 times more powerfull than that.
It’s because we’ve been studying UFO’s from space for decades now trying to reverse engineer their tech
@@eianfederle2715 Lmao try a million times faster
Technology seemed to advance most rapidly from the late 1800's to the late 1900's then it seems like it has stagnated.
“It turns out scientists have been developing SCP technology for more then half a century”
Oh no what did Dr Bright leak this time…
hahah
dr bright is not allowed leak any information of anomalous technologies to the outside world. no, not even if it is for the betterment of mankind.
I swear as soon as I heard SCP my mind immediately thought, "Secure....Contain....Protect"! lmao
I love the part where it's like "it doesn't use any exotic energy, just requires [some magical and natural bending of spacetime that we have to find exists and catch a ride, like an ocean wave]"
Well, this is the Destiny channel. Forget who, but believe Event Horizon, perhaps Mr Godier's channel covered the MW Cavity testing. In testing, but, NOT currently useful.
Well we know spacetime bending really does happen, see gravity waves.
Kalibonga dude 🌊😎
@@andypanda4927 i see your a man of culture
Lol
I believe and hope that we will see it during our life here on earth.
I do not. I hope that humanity will not develop such powerful technology until it has matured. Modern humanity today simply is not ready for such power. We would destroy everything, and eventually even ourselves for greed and stupidity. Only once we understand our place in this universe can humans handle such technology.
Remember with all these advances and wants, we move farther and farther from our lives now, and as I am starting to see, there are consequences with are forward movement. For you young ones, I remember entering into high school and personal computers we're starting to be made available in schools, I remember the Apple 2 and the Apple 2E and then the macintosh. Back then all this was so exciting and great and very addictive , then I remember when the Internet 1st came round and was made avaliable to the public, good old AOL, 😝😆
So what I'm saying is in such a long time when the time I was born there was my online telephones there was no cell phones heck a pager was a big deal when I was young . I graduated in 1984 and thought none of these things would have a bad effect on society and only good would come of all this matter fact I was confident a 100% of it. Now I look at how the world is and how divided and stubborn everybody has become how harmful Internet and cell phones can be as we are discovering all these new downsides. I wasn't worried about global warming I didn't care I used wasted thru things away right on the side of the highways, it wasn't my problem. All I'm telling you right now is Exactly how I felt back then. All these big changes really came within about 35 years people that's not that long and what how much damage there really yes. At the same time I love the idea of AI and can see many uses. I also worry about how much truly downside there's gonna be from all that. How much of the core soul and humanity are we gonna lose in the next 100 to 500 years. I remember watching terminator and thinking how scary that was but it could never happen not a mine at lifetime. Then I remember I think in the nineties when I Robot came out and I'm like yeah there's no way we'll see that kind of devbut meant, but we're knocking on the door right now. With all these advancements the amount of diseases we have obesity all across the major developed countries how unhealthy people are, I ended up With crowns by the time I turned 20 years old but I've managed it. But what I'm wondering is what more are we gonna have to lose of what I feel is the core of what makes us order to get To that final point before what we hope is good. No I am told that I actually will be alive by the time the planet heats up to the 1.5ﾟ mark. Wow And I have to face that I know my son will probably be around when the global warming hits past the 2ﾟ I wonder what the world's gonna be like when I'm gone then and how much suffering there's really gonna because the turnaround isn't gonna be fast enough any longer from the modeling that they've done. So I'm gonna leave you with this be careful what you wish for and I truly believe there is such a thing as karma and it has a way of finding people. I don't want English it's to be around by the time we actually land people on verse, but what I want to be some of the 1st people to do that absolutely not I don't know why anybody would want to be the 1st to do it when there is a very good chance that none of them will ever make it back To Earth. I would miss the little things that we can enjoy here the sun on our face a cold glass of water for me Mountain Dew a sunrise sunset being able to paddle at Canoe and most of all eat the foods that I enjoy. I'm not ready to give up my movies, Or stop living my life the way that I enjoy now. Adventure is The key purpose to really living a fulfilled life but throwing it away on a barren plan it is not my idea of the Marvel and glory that we had when we made it to the moon and came back. I really do not remember it vecase I was only 6 tears old,lol. Enjoy your family and loved ones and your friends and make the most out of the time you have here because a year goes by like the blank of an eye.
@@whowhatwhydoyouknow😂 exactly....we are still dum
@@whowhatwhydoyouknowok buddy 🤣
.
Maybe there isn’t a “breaking the laws of physics.” Maybe we don’t know everything.
Exactly. Perhaps physical reality .....also isn't the only reality. That just encapsulates what we 'already can' measure and observe. What else might exist that we are unaware of?
@@sKraat528 We don't know what we don't know.
@Halo Studios XR Yes before the universe existed there was a life form alone he didn't like it and created the universe.
And maybe one of those things is that physics can break because it isn’t law, it’s just a habit or tendency
@@influentia1patterns Maybe it doesn't need to be broken simply bend it a little.
“Were talking Ludicrous speed”
Ludacris: “LUDAAAA!!”
Spaceballs lol
He said we gotta travel at "move bitch get out the way" speed 🤣
@@philliprogers964 What's the matter, Col. Sanders? Chicken?
Are we stopped? Well why don't we take a five minute break ... smoke if you get 'em ...
@@StephenJacksonRerumFontis Thank you for pressing the self-destruct button.... LOL
There are many issues with this video, but I want to point out two things: "almost no exotic matter" (or whatever the quote was) still is a MASSIVE problem because we still have absolutely no idea how to procure such stuff.
Also, a warp drive would allow us to push past the speed of light; movement within space time itself is limited by the speed of light, but manipulating space time isn't.
Are you talking about anti-matter because if you are CERN pretty much makes it
Also he demonstrated a lack understanding of Newton's 3rd law when he stated that an airplane flies by pushing against the air.
@@dionysius1321 in atomically small quantities, sure.
@@dionysius1321 yeah, seriously. Like EXTREMELY, TINY, ULTRAMICROSCOPIC amounts. Antimatter is what, like $62.5 _TRILLION_ for a single gram? And you're talking about enough to move tons of metal through space? No, CERN is sooo not "pretty much" making it.
Also he was saying we’d run out of fuel in space but once you reach a speed and aren’t around any large bodies of mass you won’t need to produce any more thrust, you’ll just keep moving at that speed
Okay my one question since a kid with acquiring such speeds.. what about all the meteors and obstacles in space? Does the force of the speed make for a clear path or are crazy technological advances required to instantly re-route
The universe has cleverly protected itself from the rapid spread of humans
by making fast interstellar travel extremely difficult.
Pretty smart for a big load of gas and dust...
Ya, maybe we should be thinking of ways to extend the lifespan of the sun instead. At least we've got a billion years to come up with a cunning plan.
That's what the reapers are for.
Underrated
aliens of evolution races helped shape this part of the universe in the big multiverse
Actually it’s protecting itself from wonky cause and effect issues.
This whole channel is like the junk food of science and space. That was 11 minutes of nothing.
Yes, it’s laughable
Thank you for saving my time👍 🖖
Like all those videos that talk about how the new super battery that'll change the world is almost here.
I agree but the only interesting bit was at the very end where he actually talks about faster than light travel
But it's the entrance for us legos which know nothing about this stuff, wouldn't mind if you could share some of those better quality channels
"pack up our bags and move to another planet, it sounds easy."
Yeah, maybe to the Galactic Empire. No one on earth thinks that sounds "easy"
For the Empire!
Once it's done, from there on it will be.
We can't look after this planet, good luck terraforming another.
Im afraid there will be another stupid slogan like "green life matters"
technology has been exponentially getting better, probably within the next couple of decades, we will see light speed
Not even close to that
I have a better and simpler idea based on my observation that every time I eat spaghetti with marinara sauce on it while wearing a white shirt, some of the red sauce always manages to jump by itself from the spaghetti onto the white shirt. My proposal is to utilize the force that drives the sauce to the shirt to propel a spacecraft forward through the depths of the universe.
The proposal is simplicity itself. Simply suspend, from a pole hung out in front of the spacecraft, a net containing spaghetti well drenched in marinara sauce while the nose of the spacecraft is covered with white dress shirts. The force attracting the red sauce onto the white shirts will propel the spacecraft forward indefinitely, especially if a means is provided continuously to replenish the sauce on the spaghetti and the white shirts covering the nose of the spacecraft.
Jeezuz,,,that was funny!!!
Amazing and revolutionary
Laughing my azz off..............
LMAO
Omg I died laughing
EM Drive was confirmed to NOT work unfortunately. Any effects were determined to be due to external factors. Depressing.
Perhaps they could combine it with something else to create a hybrid propulsion system. I think that's worth a try.
I KNOW!! I saw that here a few weeks ago on another channel. They should do some very quick research to verify what they are talking about. The Guy or Robot has a great voice though! 🤡
I thought he sounded like Thunderf00t so I kept watching. But Thunderf00t completely calls out the Em drive and shows what complete sh*t it really is. We still can't break the laws of psychics guys! The Em drive would break conservation of energy, so I was skeptical from the first time I heard about it. Input always equals output! And just like "free energy" and perpetual motion machines it really doesn't work...
@@taborturtle brilliant lol
@@stephenlangsl67 nope, it is literally less efficient than pointing a big enough flashlight out the back of the spaceship.
All breakthroughs have happened faster than anyone previously thought that they would, I have no doubt the next will also.
I think we'll see some pretty damn interesting propulsion tech in our lifetime.
Not sure if FTL or even light speed is actually possible, I mean the fastest thing we can use now is light, and it would require 100% efficiency to go light speed while using light as a propellant...
Some damn interesting things are coming though.
Excellent voice over, and interesting content :)
I love how varied the ideas are here in these devices.
From solar sails which are simple, lightweight craft that “ride” a nearby star’s radiation to propel itself… ok reasonable idea.
To engines that use exotic negative mass matter (that is only theorized to exist) to distort space time locally around a ship, allowing it to surf the fabric of the universe itself…
I guess if you think about, that is no more crazy than the logic behind our current means of space flight 🚀
Yeah, let’s just ride a massive explosion into space, sitting on building-sized fuel tanks that will send a tiny craft no further than our own moon.
why do we need exotic negative mass matter, like dark matter tho? if we cant even see or contain it how do we know it would do what we need?
@@thirdworldrider6991 In my limited understanding of the concept of a warp drive shown in this video, the drive works by contracting space-time in front of the ship and expanding it behind the ship.
We know that mass causes space to contract (giving us gravity), but what would cause space to expand (giving anti-gravity)?
Thinking about it purely mathematically, a material that expands space and pushes things away from it would have a “negative mass”.
I think the idea is that researches suggest that such a material is possible, but if it is, it is probably extremely rare in our part of the universe since we have not observed it yet (hence why they call it exotic).
Just curious, mad about space but not an engineer, but didn't the Voyager probes use a very early form of solar sail?
@@matthewgumabon7498 a problem I have understanding mass and anti matter, is that we can’t really define empty space. What exactly is expanding? i think there may be more dimensions than we can perceive bc alone it does not make sense. In flatland, a 3D object moves through and appears to grow then shrink. Our universal perspective says the universe is expanding, but it might be missing more info than that
Yeah a big ship the shape of a penis .!!lola o and knowing big chance on absolutely never able to return .I guarantee nobody smart enough to design and engineer these specs are not getting on one of these point blank period.
Light-speed engines don't solve the problems of acceleration forces on the human body, nor running into debris that would disintegrate you instantly no matter how big is the particle you hit. Light-speed ultimately doesn't make sense... Unless you can alter your mass at the same time by interaction with the Higgs field, and also perhaps if you have some kind of "anti-gravity" that you could "project" in front of your ship that would "blow" debris/gases/particles away from you as you traveled through them. Charting from star to star might be simple enough, as long as you don't travel at full speed through the solar systems of any stars...
Going at the speed of light also means that u are also going into the future and the time on earth will be a lot slower compared to the people on the ship so it would be pointless to go at the speed of light in the first place .
Phase dampers that actually keep you out of phase enough just enough that the acceleration doesn't collapse you into nothingness
Lol you trying so hard to sound smart as everything you said was wrong
@@sully9832 Not trying hard at all. Name one thing I said that you know for certain is wrong. You've got nothing.
@@oprahwinfree2704 I guarantee you he has nothing
"the US has never put a reactor into space"
*sad perseverance, voyager, and curiosity noises*
A radioactive ball is not a fission pile.
Those were RTGs, not proper reactors
They were powered by thermoelectric generators driven by the heat produced by radioactive decay not nuclear reactors.
@@donaldboughton8686 true, true...
@@saturn5mtw567 yeah im starting to rethink this lol
The holy grail of human space travel is a propulsion system that can accelerate/decelerate a vehicle at 32 feet/second/second for an unlimited period of time....
I can't wait until the Vulkans spot that warp drive signature...
and then the klingons
..can’t wait to see the NX launch.
🤣
@William and Romulans...but we already have a Space Force with a logo “really”” similar to the Federation symbol, or Motorola symbol. So which is it? Can you hear me now?
If we are successful making fusion energy, we can maybe have enough power to travel warp 1 for a few minutes, but if we had a Dyson sphere we could travel at warp speed a bit longer.
We started with sails across the seas, we start with sails across space. History repeats itself.
True indeed
@@rojeliotamayo171 what about getting an auto-mac in Titan? That would truly be history repeating itself
I really hope this becomes a reality in my lifetime. I’m not hoping for space travel to become mainstream in my lifetime, I just want ONE successful test of an engine that could get to mars in under 6 months. That would be amazing.
You would have to travel 30,000mph non stop to do that.
@@youngkeazy2806 the fastest spacecraft speed was 364,660 mph(achieved by the parker solar probe). with mars being at its minimum distance to earth it is 33.9 million miles. not accounting for takeoff and landing, at a constant speed of 364,660 mph it would take the probe roughly 93 hours to reach mars. all hypothetical with many factors not considered but possible
Good l'UCL cause no matter wgat u think NO one gas or hors to space its all a Bunch if lies
Please don´t hope. Its never happen to human...Why ? Ask USA !!
Realistic Virtual Reality will be the closest thing to this you'll ever experience in our LifeTime, and it'll still be glorious.
Such an interesting and engaging video, I couldn't stop watching!
In March 2021, physicists at the Dresden University of Technology (Germany) published three papers claiming that all results showing thrust were false positives explained by outside forces,
When power flows into the EmDrive, the engine warms up. This also causes the fastening elements on the scale to warp, causing the scale to move to a new zero point. We were able to prevent that in an improved structure. Our measurements refute all EmDrive claims by at least 3 orders of magnitude.
Additionally, the Dresden University scientists were able to replicate apparent thrusts similar to those measured by the NASA team, and then make them disappear again when measured using point suspension.
or maybe thats what scientists in rival countries want their counterparts to believe...it doesnt work stop looking into it. when in fact it can work, and they want to be the ones to make it.
Whn I saw 1 Reply, I thght it wd say " Uh ? "
You can't break the laws of physics,
you can only discover their limits.
So called LAWS change.
It will NEVER happen if democrats keep stealing elections. Their so called infinite money is GOING to run out.
@@jeromyzwiers1452how embarrassing, is it to keep being a loser? 😆😆😆
Do you even science bro?!
@@rockytalkndawoods3057 "even science bro" why did u word it like that
@@attrennux0000 cause it's funny.
So basically we just have to warp space around the space ship.
Yup but the only know way to do that is with physical mass and the amount of mass required to generate significant warping is near impossible to acquire...something like 10% the mass of the sun.
Sounds like the premise of that movie Event Horizon.
Yup technicly you wouldnt even be moving you would move space wich makes it possible to travel very large distances without experiencing time dialation meaning if you travel to another star and back the same time has passed on earth then in your spaceship without a warp bubble this would have huge time dialation effects resulting in paradoxes you would get back to earth maybe in 2 min but 200 years would have passed on earth
@@jerometruitt2731 not impossible the enegy requirements will go down b4cause 15 years ago they thought they needed the energy of the entire universe thats A LOT more then a planet the size of jupiter youll see in the future its not gonne take more then a jerrycan of that stuff
@@danielstokker how would it end in paradoxes if you're only moving forward in time?
1:10 I might be wrong here, but:
Because of how general relativity works, when one is going the speed of light, they reach their destination instantly from their perspective, even if an outside observer only sees them as going ~300m/s. This is the effect of time dilation, and it also means that if one is moving at the speed of light they perceive traveling 1m as taking the same ammount of time as 1 light year.
Until we have shields, light speed travel would end at the first contact with a spec of space dust
Even at subluminal speeds, hitting a peddle at a few thousand km/s would probably end the whole ships career.
In orbit in this day and age, a piece of space junk can rip a satellite apart and they often only have a difference in speed measured in single digits of km/s or even a few hundred m/s.
@@rey_nemaattori Then we need Ludicrous Speed.
@@JesusChristDenton_7 "Smoke if ya got em'" lol
@@rey_nemaattori With the warp drive, the ship isn't going fast, the ship isn't moving at all. The space around the ship is moving, he described the space as folding up in the back and down at the bottom. If this was possible, all items that would be in front of the ship would be distorted out of the space ships way. The reason the people inside wouldn't feel like they are moving is because they technically aren't moving.
Maybe they can create an atmosphere shield that will instantly Vaporise any small
Debris in front of the bow . Replicating the effect of an object entering the atmosphere .
There was the Daedalus project, which never went past the design stage due largely to the fact that it used nuclear propulsion and it was designed at the height of anti-nuclear sentiment in the US. Apparently it would have been able to hit 12% the speed of light, which would have got us to Barnard's Star within 50 years or so.
sauce
@@papakilo-2750 Encyclopedia of Space by Ian Ridpath I believe. I read it as a kid.
@John Smith it's real
honestly can't imagine us
ever building anything that goes over 2% the speed of light, which is still an outstanding speed
@TRYP nuclear pulse propulsion is real, and it has been proven to work and if made large enough could very easily go 12% the speed of light. It is not very hard to go that fast and the only thing that limits us is cost
Recent testing of the EM drive ( not NASA) initially showed thrust , but when they ' changed " the configuration of support points. they could no longer measure thrust and ' theorized ' that it was some sort of thermal heating of the scale . NASA takes these kinds of things into account anyway .
there is no warp drive, but there is an inertial cancellation system. ( that which has no inertia, moves freely through space with very little thrust)
It would be so funny to be like “alright guys time to test the engine” and it just vanishes. I know that’s not how it works but it seems like a funny plot for future cartoons or something.
That's kind of what happened with event horizon
Lol this was lowkey funny 😆 good shit
Actually that probably would happen
"Aerojet Rocketdyne" is a great company name...It is like a 5 year old naming something. So if I asked my 6 year old to name a weapons company it would be "Shootygun BlasterCompany"
So when are Shootygun Blasters projected to hit the market?
Haha ure right 😂
: Sounds like you’re a Yoyodyne kind of guy, huh ?
The moment you mentioned that it can somehow overcome conservation of momentum, I rolled my eyes. You've got to give up an equal amount of something in one direction to go in the other.
In our *current* understanding of physics, yes.
@@simm815 This is not our current understanding of physics. All sign point toward the fact that this is an immutable law of nature. In fact the EM drive mention in this video was debunked recently. It was leaking microwave that were warming up the balance, loosening the joints and thus faked a thrust.
I know this doesn’t look like it, but this video is the steaming pile of garbage my friend
The EM drive was debunked recently
I think it is possible not to use the engine the whole time because of the fact a object flying in space can’t slow down or stop without artificial means, but not first igniting is not possible
@@simm815 Of course in our current understanding of physics. But the conservation of energy has been so finite that it is likely one of the few things that will not change because it is simply logic. To give something is to take something, if you give something and nothing is taken, there would be so many loopholes.
I hope I get to see us building something that will travel at least half light speed and explore nearby star systems in my lifetime.
You do understand that getting to high speed requires as much energy/fuel as slowing down
One thing that always bothers me about near light-speed travel is that if you hit a grain of interstellar dust at that speed it could be catastrophic.
When you can travel faster, you can travel further. The volume you sweep through will be greater, and the probability of encountering a dust grain will be greater too.
Wipple shields, I guess.
We’re going to need some pretty impressive technology we’re going to need cameras good enough to see the grains of dust while traveling and we’re going to need AI to be able to calculate quick enough to dodge this dust
Or if you create a bubble of space time as a buffer zone, it makes dangerous space dust irrelevant
@Loli4lyf because we don’t actually know how to?
@Loli4lyf Well, that's what a space time bubble will do. Any dust, alpha particles, etc... will just flow around the space craft.
I HATE when someone says “breaks the laws of physics”. That isn’t a thing. You can’t break physics.
but blackholes break physics? before the universe began physics were broke
It’s a figure of speech, it just means violates what we currently understand about physics.
i agree with but also cant agree with something that been broken before !
@@maxime9006 exactly its like a never seen before
the laws of physics have never been broken, we just discover new laws and more accurate versions of old laws. I understand that this might be a bit much for a non-scientist to comprehend.
Imagine going 99.999% the speed of light and then you turn on your headlights.
you'll only be ably to 0.001% of what is in front of you
2:00
EMpossible Drive
Fun Fact: EM also means Electro Magnetic drive.
3:07
2001 shouldn't look like 1901.
That goes for 2016 (4:11) as well. We were live & definitely in color then.
We're way past the black🔳, white🔲, & gray or grey pictures & videos of the 19th century until the 80s of the 20th century.
So enough of the misleading presentation!
Guys stop saying “It breaks the laws of physics.” It’s an oxymoronic statement.
Well it would break CURRENT laws of physics.
@@illicitlegacy3783 If our model can be broken, then it doesn’t match nature, and therefore not a “law”. So breaking a meaningless model, is not breaking the laws of physics.
No the term laws of physics is itself an oxymoron. Did you know that Dark energy breaks the law of conservation of energy. It turns out that all conservation laws is just an artifact of mathematical symmetry and they can be broken if the symmetry is broken. They should replace the term "laws of physics" with "properties of symmetry" because that is what they really are properties of a mathematical concept express in the real world.
C M But they are not laws of physics because the rare and specific scenario where this laws fail is still part of physics. They are laws of some physics but not laws of all physics. The laws of physics that cannot be violated can be violated that is textbook oxymoron.
Our discussion boils down to semantics. There are the real laws of nature, and then there are our models. That’s it.
And oh don’t even get me started on dark energy and dark matter lol
It takes a different kind of balls to go ludicrous speed, some may say you'll need spaceballs in order to
It wouldn’t take you 4 years at light speed to get there, it would be instant for you if you traveled at light speed on the ship it would only be 4 years relative to the people on earth
I though 4 light years meant that light would take 4 years to cover such a distance.
@@OmegaF77 idk anything involving the speed of light is confusing for me and I dont understand it :(
@@OmegaF77 yes it's correct. But, when you accelerate to that speed time slows down for you. Travelling at light speed would effectively stop time entirely, so the trip to anywhere at light speed would be instantaneous for everyone on the ship, for anyone waiting on the other side, 4 years would pass before the ship arrives though.
Yep! Thats what im sayin!👉👈
@@ClySuva So let me get this straight. If I travel 299,792,458 m/s mathematically it would take me 1 year to travel 9.5 trillion kilometers. However, you're saying that by traveling 299,792,458 m/s, I could cover that 9.5 trillion kilometers instantaneously, and the light bouncing off of me would take one year to reach the viewer. That sounds like it violates the constant speed since I'm one year faster than light but also travelling at 299,792,458 m/s. That sounds like a violation of constant speed.
You dont “break” physics.
you find new elements of it.
I hope we will witness "Ludicrous" speed in our lifetime
Moveeeee bitch get out the waaayyy getttt out the way bitch get out the wayyyy!!! 🎵🎶
Get a tesla
We're all going to plaid
I hope they can figure out how to extend my lifetime so I can be around longer to see these things happen
In other words, a whole video about absolutely bloody nothing.
Congratulations 👏
Not thinking "outside the box" as the saying goes, are You Nicko Loubser?
For heaven's sake, there is no "pushing off" anything, it's just Newton's law of every action having an equal and opposite reaction. Another way to look at it is that the centre of mass of both the spaceship and all the propellent it has exhausted hasn't moved at all, it's just as the propellent goes further away in one direction. The spaceship will go in the other direction such that the centre of mass stays the say. A simple scenario that's easy to calculate is to imagine yourself on an infinite friction less surface and you three a baseball. The baseball goes quickly in one direction while you in the other direction but calculate where the centre of mass is of both you and the baseball and it has never moved. Rocket propulsion just spreads mass out and it's just a matter of what spreads in what direction for the rest to go in the desired direction. Once you include other mass in a system such as "pushing off" something, calculate the centre of mass of everything in the system including whatever you so called pushed off from and the centre of mass would still be unmoved, likewise ifvthepropellent or spaceship interacts with any other mass. You have to include that other mass and whatever that other mass interacts with into the calculation and you will see that overall nothing really moved, it all just spreads out. The EM drive violates this as everything in the system moves in the same direction and thus the centre of mass of the system moves and this should be impossible. Keep in mind, although the experiments done with the EM drive shows a slight propulsion, it's well within the margin of error of no propulsion at all and is about the same as the propulsion you would get from one from a penlight shining photons in one direction.
Imagine taking to time to write that whole essay just because of an argument
lol WANG
There is one method that can accelerate masses without a propellent: gravity. Granted, gravity can not be used to accelerate space craft to other stars, but does provide a method to accelerate objects without a propellent. Perhaps there might just be another method that we haven't discovered. Another possibility is if the a constant like the permeability of free space can be changed locally which might enable spacecraft to travel with less propellent.
Then there is a of course the option of slow boats: Large multi-generational ships (perhaps made out large asteroids that take thousands of years to reach other stars. If the goal is to populate other worlds over then next 10M years, that is very feasible.
not reading all that if you can't spell words correctly
Such a long paragraph. 😑
There is no such thing as breaking the laws of physics, but simply misunderstanding of the physics.
Question? Travelling @FTL speed, how do you avoid space objects/debris, micro particules etc. that could potentialy destroy the ship? Would'nt you need a material that can absorb the shocks? Some type of shield?
Navigational deflector.
@@boardman49 Ah, yes. The magic of just saying something.
we would need to design the ship with a large boulder at the front to avoid being hit with space debris and put heat shields, radiation shields to protect the people inside
@@LawDawg717 …which cannot be heard in space.
Alpha Centauri being 4.367 light years away means it wouldn’t take 4.367 years to travel there at the speed of light in your OWN reference frame. You would get there instantaneously, but it would be 4.367 years later.
Are you sure? I thought you experienced time as passing at a constant rate for yourself, no matter how fast you would travel, but that you would see time warping in other reference frames and only other reference frames?
Did they forget about the rocks in space, I’d imagine hitting one of them at lightspeed wouldn’t be nice
Me too 😂
Definitely would be a really bad day, but in reality there is a lot of empty space. You would be able to navigate your way through, safely with the right navigating systems.
beats being consumed by the sun thats for sure
@@HP_RUclips-Channel That's not entirely true. There is a lot of space dust out there and solar winds comprised of charged particles being emitted by stars. This might seem negligible, but it becomes a big deal at extremely high speeds. We would need to invent some type of force field to deflect them away, otherwise they could easily cause damage to the ship.
@@chroma6947 we’ll be long extinct by then
Say Lockheed Martin 🦨 Skunk works William Tompkins design and I will believe you!
The fact that is even possible is so exciting dosen’t matter if we don’t get to see it just knowing we’ll get there one day is enough
🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂🤣😂
I love your avatar photo with that title
We will eventually find a way to go extremely much faster than the Speed of Light.
Just got to live long enough. May it be by planned experiments, or by accident we stumble onto something.
I have faith in mankind...
Even though, As of right now these fools haven't gotten the Magellan satellite into space just yet. (11/29/21)
I think the first plans were for the Magellan satellite to be in space by 2018 🤔
It's just a theory, some theories end up being wrong. Also, the tech to build a theoretical drive may be out of reach for several thousands of years or forever unpractical/not doable. This video is a year old, even then the EM drive was proven to be a bunch of BS. Of course, hard facts don't really matter to the vid creator and most viewers of it and the commentators. Channels like this are the domain of basic science illiterates. This is a quick bux channel catering to rubes and nothing more.
I believe there is still a new mathematics yet to be discovered in order to understand space time . Our understanding of Science/ physics in general is still very young.
we dont even KNOW what gravity IS.
Possibly related to the Biefeld/Brown Effect, wherein given a high enough voltage, a capacitor shows movement towards the positive plate. Propulsion is proven to not be ionic wind, as this effect is seen in a properly charged capacitor that is in a vacuum.
I have the perfect answer for intergalactic travel -
1: Give weebs unlimited funds.
2: Designate a planet a dozen hundred lightyears away and claim it to be home of catgirls - innocent as virgins and frisky as vixens.
3: ????
4: Profit.
I feel like they'd never get around to working on getting there because they'd all meet up and start collaboratively writing fanfiction about this wonderful new dream land they're going to reach someday.
@@mmmmhmmmm7217 trust me - make it seem a reality and they'll MAKE the transportation a reality.
You gotta crack an egg or two to make an omelette...
I loved the " ????" Part 😂😂😂
I think this might be the dumbest comment in history.
@@zzzzzz1039 r/woosh
Last time there was a serious breakthrough in rockets specifically it was physics we had already known before but were overlooked, what if this is the same situation 🤔
Funny thing is... Yes!
Built with physics, math, components and manufacturing technology available pre 1970.
The Mcgyver prototype, proof of concept prototype, built and tested in Feb 2021. Wasn't supposed to work.
The first all electric Sub Light Impulse Engine is being built now.
Once in Orbit, propellant is obsolete.
This is the pre flight engine design.
3 maybe 4 months and everything will change.
New company forming now, public announcement soon.
Merry Christmas
Douglas Renzoni CTO
"Designs" is a pretty strong word. Sensationalists again.
Recently, Google has created a "time stone" with their quantum computer that's said to hugely advance our knowledge of physics. That would help in advancing warp drive technology, but even with that, it would probably take another century or two before a working model comes out. We still have yet created the technology required to hold the mass and power needed to make the warp drive work. Also there won't be any form of thrust when it comes to the alcubiere drive. Space time contracts in the front and expands in the back. In other words, space itself is moving, not the ship. Now you see why it takes so much mass and power to do that. Especially to make a literal physical "bubble" around it.
Time crystal I think it’s called.
@@steviebee1989 Yep! I'm super excited about its creation too. Time crystals will revolutionize everything!
Seems like bull shit. The only warp drive plans I've seen involve negative mass matter. Quantum computers take advantage the properties that regular mass has on the quantum level. Any warp drive I've seen requires a hypothetical material that has anti gravity properties. There is no evidence of anything like that anywhere in the observable universe, and no one can even come up with a hypothetical way it could be made.
That can move faster than light no less
Time crystals and warp drives aren't related at all. If you'll remember the first law... Anything at rest remain at rest until acted on by an outside force and anything in motion will remain in motion unless acted on. Most matter follows the first part. The time crystals are an arrangement of matter that follows the second part. If you want to see a cool demonstration of a similar concept then lookup self synchronizing metronome array. Similar concept, just backwards.
If time crystals help anything, then it will be in the development of an actual Mach drive.
Design is one thing, and actually building one is another.Government oversight would weigh any possible build to a halt.Not to mention a hundred other technologies necessary.
NA, they force purchase the tech in the name of national security. Then fully develop the tech in secret for military use.
Nah theyd all fight for whoever gets rights to it then put everything they got into the research so they can claim resource rich territories in space first
I think warp drive invention is gonna be one of those things that is discovered as a result of a major accident. We'll be working on some kind of high energy generation project; something will go critical and boom! It will just then take us decades to figure out that the reaction could be used in a warp drive, and then it will probably take us decades or even centuries after that to harness and make the reaction useable for practical FTL travel on vessels. I just don't see humanity inventing something like warp drive with out blowing themselves and proto types up A LOT before we finally get it right and start to master the technology needed.
Whose to say they haven’t found and tried so years ago and are now slowly leaking the data . Just because it isn’t in your face doesn’t mean it’s not there.
@@ezee1178 chill, this guy is only putting his opinion out there. dont berate him for it
here before this actually happens
But, that's how we do!
HFY
@@GamerGod-fp1tj And the other guy is also putting his?
Nice thought provoking article.
imagine aliens that have been watching us for thousands of years, and when we finally reach faster than light speeds, they will contact us^^
You've been watching to much star trek.
Will they? Or will they decide we are too much of a threat?
Faster than light 🤣🤣 Nasa would settle for 1% light speed at this point, and that's Far out of reach at present...
@@michaelbritain5546 It is already possible to reach up to 10% light speed
or they can visit us now, instead of waiting till we can go to them.
Here’s the thing, the universe is filled with particles flying here and there. So, for a vessel to go faster than light would have to be made of exotic matter that has an infinite electron degenerate pressure to overcome the impacts of those particles onto the vessel.
Not to mention also everything observable outside the vessel would be pitch black.
..@ the end it mentions exotic matter @advanced proportion & applied physics laboratory
so if you warp the space (with the wathever matter and mass particles) around you.. how does it ever hit the hull?
Warping space time doesn’t mean moving anything. You would still hit the atoms in space.
@@zo0ot404then warp it to create 2 "pits" in front of your vessel.. pulling your vessel towards the center of the 2 pits and whatever particles toward each of the pits. unknown yet of course if just the warping of spacetime would create a gravity / pull effect but hey, it's all theoretical discussion anyways
If you try ludicrous speed, you run the risk of going plaid
And overshoot a week and a half from your destination. Plus you'll be thrown if you don't buckle up.
I had to scroll down too far before I saw a Spaceballs reference. LOL
And that sudden stop
Thought #2, No matter what kind of engines that generate thrust are developed, the speeds they can attain will be limited to matching the speed of whatever is ejected from them to generate the thrust. So even if an engine’s thrust was generated by expelling say, electrons or photons, the spacecraft itself could only theoretically reach the speed of light, but it could not exceed that speed. Einstein theorized that as the speed of light is approached, mass increases to the point of infinity. That implies Impossibility, at least in that environment. The idea of warp engines is intriguing, but the concept seeks to alter the environment of space itself. Suppose someone- somewhere- has figured out how to alter the effect of the environment instead. Consider the laminar flow airfoil. It didn’t alter the environment, it altered its effect. Back to infinite mass. And FTL propulsion. Consider the effects of mass on gravity. Gravity can equate to acceleration. If unlimited mass can be generated and regulated, might it equate to unlimited gravity and therefore unlimited acceleration? Might someone, somewhere, with a background of thousands or perhaps millions of years of technological advancement have figured all this out? Might we, at some point? It’s certainly worth thinking about!
The problem is if you travel that fast in space you'll probably crash into some kind of space debris. You won't be able to steer around it.
That is one BIG problem. Even hitting a speck of dust at light speed will go through your ship like the hull wasn't even there.
Before you can even think of doing silly speeds, you have to devise some means of deflecting any debris you may encounter.
@@Tryst46 plus the human body is pushed to the limits at 300km/h that why jet fighters are heavily conditioned, what happens to the body at near light or light speed?
@@ltmoistlipsiii5387 Most of the problems with jet fighters are to do with manouvers that rack up considerable G forces.
A commercial jet can fly at those speeds but their manouvers are very slow and gentle so they don't cause the G forces.
When it comes to light speed, or any speed in a straight line for that matter, Acceleration and deceleration are the only real factors. But to prevent a human body becoming nothing but a mark on the bulkhead, acceleration/deceleration would have to be so slow that it would take weeks or months to complete. There would be no changes in direction, the ship itself would tear apart if you tried.
@@Tryst46 Thats a very good point however we would still need something that could take the stress at lightspeed, and idk still think people in a vessel going that fast would need some sorta statis
@@ltmoistlipsiii5387 your body leaves you and only your soul is left in the space ship lol
"Engage the enclosed-system cold fusion warp drive, Scotty!"
"Aye cap'n, but I dunno if it'll work."
You’ve been to space and traveled in a vacuum, only in your deepest imagination, it’s called the impossible engine because that’s exactly what it is, it’s funny how they explain that push is what causes motion yet they invoke that “gravity” and why things fall is due to a pull, there’s no such force as pull, pull is merely a descriptor of something being pushed towards you, a pressure is needed to cause motion, no motion without push, all space travel is pathetic gibberish
About the Star Trek reference, The "Warp core" is just the power plant, the matter-antimatter explosions don't propel a ship. The ships have missive conduits, like a wiring harness, that move plasma from the warp core, to the warp nacelles, the nacelles do the work of "WARPING" space in front and behind it.
The current idea of using matter-antimatter explosions to propel a ship are different from the idea used in Star Trek! The current idea of using matter-antimatter explosions is like the nuclear bomb idea, both are simple, set off explosions behind the ship, the matter-antimatter explosion would just be more efficient, because it uses 100% of the fuel.
The matter-antimatter process in Star Trek is different, They use dilithium as a controlled environment for the matter-antimatter explosion and harness the energy as plasma, that is moved to the warp nacelles, (Think of a photovoltaic cells, this is some of what dilithium is facilitating), in which the part you explain miguel alcubierre's warp drive takes place.
Could it be that the answer is to not move at all. Space itself is moving and fast, so if we could find away of not moving we could surely travel great distances. I'm just a layman but that's a thought.
I think we should just create a black hole, and hang it on a string in front of the ship... Like the cartoons where they dangle the carrot in front of the donkey😂
yes
Now that's a nice new "out of the box" concept 🤔 👍