Please Don't Miss This Idea 💡 - Chess Rating Climb 1224 to 1247 ELO (Chess.com Speedrun)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 25 июл 2023
- 👉🏽 Say hello to 1500 ELO 📈
chessvibescourses.thinkific.c...
😎 Play Chess Here:
www.chess.com/membership?ref_...
👚 Merch: Chessvibes.shop
Links are affiliate links and help support the Chess Vibes channel via a commission.
One major blunder on each of the first two games completely changes the outcome. Your explanation of moves in the third game was great.A good lesson.
8:03 "Opponent can't go there"
8:08 "...Well you CAN go there, I'll just take it"
Lol
That third game was amazing, I especially appreciate the commentary. At first I was unsure how interesting this series would be, but it's been a staple of my mornings!
When I face 1200 and even 1100 opponents, they are really tough, fight like lions, force me into time trouble and sometimes push me into very awkward positions so I lose. When Nelson plays a 1200 opponent, they blunder knights, pawns, or a queen, why not? Probably they are afraid of Peter Patzer. Love this series
If you play a 200-300 same will happen with you! Its just a matter of magnitude.
I think you know the answer to why that is
@@jebbush3130 Tell us, I'm the 200-300 player
@@DanielSong39 Nelson's opponents play like all other 1100 to 1300 players. Their inaccuracies , mistakes, blunders are pounced on and the pressure is applied relentlessly by someone like Nelson and even if they get on top, they will falture at some point and play a weak move that allows Nelson to get back in. On the other hand, a 1200 vs a 1200 is going to be a mixture of the best moves, and not so good, and mistakes, and the same blunders, but not the relentless best/excellennt moves by Nelson, they will also miss each others not so good/mistakes/blunder moves.
If you spent time looking at your opponents best moves possible, and stopped him making it, you would improve immediately, and take time to look for your blunders/mistakes and his blunders and mistakes. At your level just don't bring the queen out early, don't do one move attacks, better off spending your time seeing how you can protect your own pieces more, and try not to leave pieces hanging. Fully devolope pieces, get rooks on open/half files, and learn what a bad bishop and good one is. Trade pieces when in the lead on pieces. Trade if the game is even and you are cramped in. Otherwise don't just trade. Don't open up the centre pawns by pushing them passed the 4th rank if you haven't castled, do push the pawns if they haven't castled but you have. There are more basics to learn, I better stop there, good lucj
@@Deadeye1967 thanks for those great tips! A lot of wisdom in those words 👌
I love the way you explain your thought process throughout. The chess puzzle adventure stuff is also excellent content.
Like Hikaru, Magnus, Gotham, Anna, etc but you are the best pure chess RUclipsr. Ever.
Thanks.
😊
Agreed!
Unlike those people, he's 1200 Elo 😭
But rising fast (and he's around 2400-2500 on his real account) 😁
Bro! We missed you!!! Thanks for the upload, hope you channel blows up as it deserves to!
this lessons are just a huge blessing to all of us begginers/intermediate, thank you so much and God bless :)
That rating range is the most frustrating to be in.
"Don't blunder a piece for no reason" is often the "lesson" to learn. It IS a lesson, mind, and you don't want to chalk it up and dismiss it. You want to figure out WHY you're blundering pieces, but man... It's a stage where all your other study is worthless often because of moves that just feel braindead. It doesn't feel good to win when your opponent blunders a piece for no reason and it's no fun to lose because of it either, obviously.
Still see this kind of thing happen at around 1600 from time to time, unfortunately...
I think slighty under 1k is much more frustrating - you sometimes get really interesting and fun games but it's overshadowed by people *still* trying scholars mate and other dumb stuff which makes you wonder - how many times do you have to fail with such strategy to change it? Because when I look at profiles of those people, they are winning like 3/10 games.
1200 against Nelson: blunders 2 pieces in a game.
900 against me: finds a discovered clearance sacrifice fork scewer.
I love this episodes you really helped me i was stuck on 1100 for two months (from may to july) but after watching your videos on rating climb i hit 1200 and 4 days after (today) i hit 1300 Im really thankful
I'm still the blunder King though 😢 I've tried these principles but sometimes I just don't know what to move
Dude I love your videos! You’re so calm, you explain every move and position I appreciate you so much. Keep up the great work as a 1300 this helps a lot👍 Could you also try more aggressive gambits? I love gambits to practice my tactics
Another great lesson! Really enjoying these. Thanks Nelson.
I always lose on this cramped up positions. I dont know how to identify treats when everything is attacking everything.
This is literally the first channel I check in the morning for new content. Love it
Dude, same. Coffee and chess lessons in the AM To help my brain wake up before work.
The guy in the first game played so well for his rating until that very careless knight blunder. Why do we all do silly blunders at 1200-1300 rating, we can play good but waste it all in one move.
Enjoying your rating climb, you do a great job during the game explaining the thought process. During your post review/analysis could you either explain when SF shows a "missed win" or make the lines/evaluation bar visible to see what should have been played?
Really love this series keep it up
This is a GREAT series of videos. Thanks man
Every time I watch and listen to you work its inspiring. The quickness of your mind and how it works is a pleasure . Thanks
The lesson of the last game is that the more active player will create winning situations eventually
Late upload tonight! Better late than never, I look forward to watching you each day 😄
Hey Nelson. Love the explanations :) At 6:56 I think you missed Rd6 with the intention of Rh6+# or am I missing something?
@mythbusters866 Bd2 not Bc2
Waiting until you get to 1900-2000 Elo, and then I'll watch you defeat my potential opponents
I wonder how many ppl know that they are playing you and that the game will be on RUclips before they start playing.
Great video! Thank you so much! 😀
I was actually just reading the king's gambit today, and if I recall correctly it pairs well with the Italian or bishop opening. Watching these has definitely helped me get 100 more in my ELO
King's gambit is a chad opening, especially if you don't play Nf3 early and allow black to give you queen check (but you can develop with tempo and get a big counterattack for giving up castle rights)
You are a great teacher for me...❤
These videos are fascinating and informative
Nice man, good teacher, good man
Loving this content everyday❤❤❤
I really like how Nelson articulates everything he sees and considers
Sets a good example of how you should play chess
but what i dont like about his style of play (atleast from all the games i watched on his channel) is how hes too over-aggressive sometimes and carelessly sacrifices because he thinks itll lead to something good without calculating fully. i personally think he should just play safe moves when not sure instead of reckless sacrificing which leads to him losing the game (atleast eric rosen taught me that
Sometimes chess is just a big waiting game where you hope to stall until your opponent makes a ?? Move!
it makes me so happy to see how disappointed Nelson gets when his opponent makes a blunder. he just wants people to do well, and fight a good battle :)
These videos explaining the thought process are very helpful, thanks! I saw a similar video on another channel and I recall that it mentioned that the opponent's ratings points would be adjusted--does that apply here as well? I'm just a beginner at this so not sure how things work, just wondering
Yes. The opponents don't lose any points
Thanks for the video!
Why don’t people I play, who are lower rated, make those type of mistakes lol
They probably do… or you do first :) Or you are not pressuring them enough and complicating the position till they suffer task saturation and lose track of some pieces and threats?
they for sure do, and u do too, its just that u guys dont notice it or take advantage of them correctly
Nice to watch a master who’s not an ego maniac …
Any recommendations of openings that can transpose quickly to endgames?
A lot of us thought you might lose a game around 1k-1200 range, probably because we make mistakes in each game. What rating range do you think you might lose your first game in?
I think 1500-1600
Am I the only one who noticed, that smiling Nelson looks a bit like Hide the Pain Harold ?
I am commenting even before 1 minute into the video, but I alr know it's good so 👍👍👍👍.
It actually isn't
Your videos helped me climb from 200 to 550, I know Its not that good but thank you for all of the insight
As a chess player myself
I've been playing 55 years you look to be in the 2600 range I really like how you explain
You're thought process well done
Interesting to see u struggle agaisnt low rated players
Love these
My favourite chess channel 😊
5:20 In positions like this, how do you decide which rook to bring onto the open file? Sometimes there's an obvious reason to use one rook over the other but often I feel like I'm basically tossing a coin as to which rook to use. I guess here, one is defending f7, but often, you don't even have that.
I have never been first to a chess vibes video lol
Well, from now on you should.
What a coincidence! I recently had a game where something similar to this happened and I’m about 1100
The intro stats is a big plus.
Nelsy miss your daily videos ❤
chess vibes i keep loosing games. i cant win any games anymore.
I am doing a rating climb of my own. since you started this series I went from 1700 to 1800
I am 1500, how do I get to 1700? What is the difference between a 1700 and a 1500?
@@MrDanielfff777 I honestly dont know the difference. I have been stuck at every lvl between 1200 and 1700, but I just keep playing a lot, analyse my games, watch a lot of chess videos, learn some openings and somehow I always end up climbing eventually. also never resign even at the 1700/1800 lvl people blunder.
Nice video
Nice Job 👏
More often than not taking a free pawn in the opening is a bad idea. If my opponent takes pawns, they are not developing pieces. And most likely it's not going to lead to the endgame they are hoping for.
At 7.02 Rook to the sixth (d6), trheaten mate one the h-file
good vid
Did you miss a quick mate in the first game when the White King was stranded on the h file? You could have swung your rook up to d6 lining up Rh6.
Can you play Larsen opening please
Who else would like to see a match between Nelson and @willtaylorchess?????
like this gambit
this will be so much more interesting when you start playing 1500s+
You sound frustrated when your opponent blunders😂
Isnt there a checkmate sequence on 7:03 - Rook to D6 and then rook to H6 checkmate?
can you please play a colle next video? thanks!
Climb stats?
Not brilliant but what about bh3 here 3:23 ? Oh wait qxh3 that's why I'm the blunder King.
Could you play the Vienna gambit?
Or just Vienna in general, there are so many crazy lines there like Giraffe Attack (white allows to *almost* get checkmated in one variation but has big attack and potential to trap the queen)
130 win streak lmao
can u play queens gambit one time agian? PLEEEEAAAASE. Its my opening. U never play it
Hey
Yay first 15 min!!
yee
Am I dumb for thinking Rb6 looking for Ra6 at 7:00?