@@SLYDIT yes, he could have called her out 100 times, Ms Boone you intentionally left George in the suit case to teach him a lesson, didn't you! You were mad about those women on the phone weren't you, you wanted him to pay didn't you.?
@@joda7221 Let's all hope he recalls her during rebuttal. The big problem though is that *"I think"* they can only address rebuttals based on new evidence. And the only new evidence came from anybody that spoke after her!!
Because she is. She showed more emotion about HER injury than Jorge’s death and what this has done to her son. She uses her son for sympathy when she totally ignored him and her custody arrangement
@NorthStarr0216 With all due respect, he was zipped up in a suitcase begging to be let out cause he couldn't breathe. Sarah claiming she was afraid and going to bed is horse sh$t
That may be well and true but she also said that once she had his hand secured back inside the suitcase after gouging it and his body with the bat, that she felt "safe." So she cannot have it both ways and I was shocked that the prosecutor missed that. He was not very effective.
@@NorthStarr0216the idea of being so much in fear for your life that you go upstairs, tuck yourself in bed and go to sleep is so outrageous. It’s such an egregious affront to the truth that it matters not about what people think of how a DV victim acts there is no update and I cannot foresee an update ever being realised to the non correlation of the fear response and falling asleep. Let’s forget that argument though. Let’s go a step beyond it - if she felt so relieved that he was trapped in the suitcase and the following relief was to such an extent that she relaxed so totally that she fell asleep; then surely that could only result from feeling so secure in the knowledge that he COULD NOT escape. And that then begs the question- if she feared that his anger was ever increasing the longer he stayed in that suitcase - at what point would she have felt comfortable letting him out? It would seem the answer would be never. And if that’s the case, the fact that she did not invite help to get him out of the case while she “fled” then the only logical outcome is that he languishes in that suitcase. If not from lack of oxygen then from malnutrition. And then, even if she was to water and feed him inside the suitcase, that would mean he would be held captive for the foreseeable future. None of it works. NONE of it. If she had left the house and called someone- Brian, 911, ANYONE to get him out of the suitcase immediately after she zipped him in and he died in between that time…I could have some sympathy for this woman. Even with the case as it is - if she had shown a shred of regret, a ‘scintilla’ of remorse that Jorge ended up dead I could have some sympathy for her but she just DOESNT CARE that he died. She was ‘aghast’ not upset, not horrified, not freaked out- aghast. That suggests that she was appalled. Appalled at that fact that he had dared to die on her. Not devastation nor anguish. She was flabbergasted. They are all “me”Emotions. She did not express one emotion that involves the consideration of the suffering of the other person.
She’s had the cops called so many times do way was that night any different. She knew he wasn’t getting out and was never in danger that night. The other times doesn’t matter it’s only that night !! And she killed him
Great point, by your guest, he was too weak to threaten her, he needed her help to get out her couldn’t breathe anymore…RIP Jorge, great show! Joel! ❤️🙏🤗
Bottom line is she had all night to call the police if she was frightened and afraid! She never called anyone for help ! He’s in a suitcase and she never asked never called anyone for help ! The only one asking for help was the real victim in the suitcase !
I personally love the word aghast and unlike the guests tonight, I have used it in normal conversation. Just saying. But yea, "devasted" should have also been on her Police Bingo card.
I also have and would use the word aghast - one might be aghast at their dog shitting outside the neighbours gate and realising they have no poo bags on them. One lmight be aghast at discovering the neighbour is having an affair. The level of shock indicated by the word aghast is almost a superficial one with a layer of disgust/contempt.
So I am a DV survivor and can only talk from my experience but SB does not come across as a victim. When I was in my relationship I would never ever retaliate against my partner in fear of making it worse. I hid it from everyone including my family for 6 years I would have never told his family, neighbours etc like she did as again I was in fear of repercussions terrified of it!! When SB says she tried to placate him with puzzles etc I don’t understand that. Tge night it happened she was on the phone in the background shouting about him choking her and that was early on in the night but that didn’t anger him then?? Plus she is saying that both neighbours are lying, she saying the detective is lying re the phone call so she’s saying all these people are lying and she’s telling the truth where the only actual evidence we have is her lying over and over and the jury are now suppose to believe that!!!!
I don’t know if I missed it if they did, but why didn’t anyone ask Sarah why she didn’t record the 11 minutes between the two videos of him actually threatening her instead of just recording her taunting him…that’s very suspicious to me.
@@ordinaryman2299If he was threatening her life, why not record that…. It didn’t happen… that’s why she didn’t record it. She was probably pouring a glass of wine and charging her phone AND cussing him out those 11 minutes…. 😒
What Sarah Boone did to Jorge is off the charts cruel. No jury should be putting her back on the streets for a very long time. And, Brian Boone, keep your son away from this nut! She is toxic and dangerous.
If he had really threatened her life and she was afraid he was gonna get out and kill her she would have left and called 911. Nothing has ever stopped her from calling 911 in the past. But no…. I’ll just fall up the stairs & pass out. 🙄
After watching and listening to-I believe Jorge is the victim and Sarah the aggressor in this relationship. Her injuries could have occurred during her abuse of Jorge. Her ex said she’s a violent drunk and why he left.
I've been on jury 3 times. What I rememeber the most is that when we went to deliberation phase, 1st thing we shared was what evidence stood out the most to each of us.
I believe DV victims can attempt to control their environments so as not to inflame abusers. I’m not saying she wasn’t controlling, but potentially, codependency leads to abuse, and codependents do attempt to control and “fix” things. Not saying that’s the case here, bc it’s hard to determine she was in imminent danger. I’m not sold on that danger
Exactly! There is a saying: believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. The video evidence alone should send her away for a long, long time - both her own and the body cams. She left Jorge zipped up in a suitcase. Murder 2 seems to fit the bill.
@@chantallennox1201 We just have to hope that the Jury pays strict attention to what the charge itself reads, and not that she killed him in any of the ways that come wit a murder charge, premeditated, intentional, etc.
Yes, I agree. It is the exact same scenario as with Karen Read. The problem with the Read case stems from that Prosecutors have overcharged her by making it intentional. That is so plainly obvious as to be stupid. At least they haven't done that here. However, their cross was as weak as double-watered-down-tomato-soup. They've had 4 years to prepare and her lawyer has only had a month. He has been rightfully chastised for some of his shenanigans, but he is doing a good job otherwise.
@@zackeze3478 Do you really think she'd have relinquished her phone knowing that she'd taped it? She's not very smart, granted but she's been arrested enough to be wiser than that.
The states cross examination was a total disaster. Totally ineffective and failed to pick up on her lies and challenge them on the spot...AND they failed to object to all the leading questions from the defense
Her husband Brian said she is the one that gets violent. She did it with him constantly when they were together. She presents herself as the one that wears the pants in all relationships and the husband verified this.
NO DV victim would taunt their abuser and do what she did by locking him up and then going off to sleep comfortably one floor above the person, your abuser that will take your life once he is freed. The woman on the jury that went through this will know this better than anyone.
If I were a prosecutor and I thought the defendant was lying about DV, I would want a DV survivor on the jury. Being one myself, I can tell if someone is being truthful about it or exaggerating it for sympathy. True survivors HATE people who lie about it.
What disappointed me about cross examination was that SB testified that Jorge threatened her life while he was in the suitcase and that she feared him, yet when she talked to the police the next day she said that she assumed he’d get out of the suitcase on his own and that he’d go upstairs and they’d have “intimate relations”. If she was so fearful, I don’t think she’d be interested in getting intimate…. I wonder why Will Jay didn’t ask her about that.. 🤷♀️
I may be giving the prosecution too much credit but I think they will make these arguments in closing without giving her the opportunity to explain the contradictions on the stand.
My impression is that everyone in the court is just walking on egg shells trying to finish the case without Sarah Boone melting down and sacking another legal team. You have to humour the mad woman.
@@govindagovindaji4662 Well I think they have all the Bodycam from when she had no problems calling the cops on him. Jumping for joy. The statements from several people that she drank from dawn to dusk and staggering through the neighborhood. From Brian that she gets aggressive when drinking. Her arrest when she choked Jorge and he had masks on his neck. Then telling him to dismiss the charges. There are so many lies. Still she was a victim of domestic violence, but it was mutual. It could be argued, he was in fear. The fact that there was no DV before he met Sarah. We will see.
He was never found guilty of domestic violence (Nolle Prosequi on the clerk's website) and it's disgusting the defense is up there smearing his name like he was and I think it should never be allowed in front of the jury. Anyone can get arrested for domestic violence, it's the cops tool to prevent tense situations from getting worse "out of an abundance of caution" and look up the Duluth model, it's what most police forces are trained on and it usually results in men being arrested with just an accusation of abuse. He may have been abusive but we'll never know because Sarah decided to play her sick fatal game with him by entrapping, beating, and suffocating him while laughing at him.
@@sherylbarry9143On the pic with the black eye the look on her face was smug and arrogant. Any pic I’ve ever seen of injuries to an abused women, especially their face, they look sad and defeated and embarrassed. She looked proud of that black eye… just my opinion.
@@coffeecake1803 and she hadn't murdered him yet so he got a chance to tell his side of the story and the state didn't prosecute him. Maybe she drunkenly fell into the counter, maybe she stepped on a broken wine bottle... we don't know because she killed him so he doesn't get to speak. None of this adds up, she's a liar, has no credibility, and is a murderer
She also did those subtle smiles at her defense team as if to suggest she thought certain of her responses were 'well executed'. But since she is not facing the Jury, they would have missed those. Honestly, it was as if she was saying with her eyes and smile, "Wow, I did a good job with that lie, didn't I?" I am not convinced that Owens is an ethical attorney. He comes off as a lawyer who would coach a witness on lying which is not a good look. But this Jury did not and does not get to see how he behaved in all the motions hearings. I can't stand when he or any of his team pat her, but I don't like that in any criminal trial, nor do I like people to pat me for any reason.
I wish the State had questioned Sarah right up to the evening adjournment so that she could still be cross-examined tomorrow but with more surgical precision. There were so many more questions the state could have asked that would have better exposed her lies.
Totally. There would have been no downside of retaining her overnight, taken the time to confer as to how successful cross was, check the socials for commentary like this video/gallery reaction/reviewing the stream with an eye to adjusting strategy, even if only to dismiss her first thing next day.
I thought the prosecutor was building up to prove she was doing something else during those 11 minutes (texting, taking pictures) instead of Jorge threatening her. But it was just a nothingburger.
FYI: The only reason her ex let her have her son certain days that was part of the agreement of custody by the Family Court. Even up to this trial, while in custody, she had video/zoom visits.
Absolutely no remorse, not one tear! I wish the state would have asked more damning questions to impeach her. I just pray the jury sees through her lies.
And she also said Jorge eats like a horse then later on said she cooked steak and baked potatoes and was trying to get him to eat… which one is it a Sarah??? 🙄
well, to be honest both can be true. I have been out of work at times and part of the day looking on job sites for a job and also spending part of the day enjoying the free time. Also, i have found the act of looking for a new job in and of itself, somewhat enjoyqble
The guy on panel is obviously well versed in prosecuting things. Uncivil law saying “worse. Cross. Ever.” means he’s mostly looking for fireworks for his channel rather than having *any* real courtroom experience. Kurt would have gone up and verbally hammered a woman who clearly was a dv victim. Now, I don’t think she gets off here and I whole heartedly also wanted to see her get her ass handed to her, but I’m not a lawyer. 😂
The relationship seems like it was a hot mess based on what she testified. Jorge wasn't threatening her while she was recording him in the suitcase and she was the one being mean and confrontational IMHO. I believe there is a mental health issue with SB for sure.
If she was worried about him getting out of the suitcase & hurting her, why would she go upstairs & go to sleep(leaving herself vulnerable while sleeping)???? Why wouldn’t she just leave the house if she thought he was going to get out & hurt her?
Replay) If Sarah was fearfully scared of Jorge, if he got out, why not call the police because she truly believed he was going to get out of it & terribly harm her, but goes to sleep? If I was scared I couldn’t sleep! Oh please, I don’t think she cared at that point what happened to him, or she would have cared more about him saying he couldn’t breathe…imo she’s guilty.
Actually she admits that she didn't go right to sleep. She went upstairs while he was still in suitcase to call her ex-husband. Of course he was still calling her name. Then she goes to sleep and not call police? She wasn't afraid of him
She's not good at math. That was apparent when the Prosecutor ask about the percentage of her alcohol level in the morning, calculating the ME's estimate alcohol blood level over time. She didn't understand how he came up with that % number after she woke up. Cause she was claiming she was still a lil intoxicated when she woke the next day. Nah, she was hungover.
All I heard this chat saying was: why didnt she just leave. Well that is setting DV awareness back 100 years. If you want to know why ppl are blocked MODS, this is why. Well said Susan Constantine.
Why is it that somehow everyone on every panel I watched so far regarding this trial is missing the vital part of the self defence instructions that you cannot claim self defense if you are the instigator. Jorge's threatening overt act (him starting to get out of the suitcase and threatening her) is the direct response to Sarah's act of zipping him in there and refusing to let him out (which is false imprisonment, a felony), Like Will Jay said, you can't point a gun at someone and then, when that someone also pulls a gun, shoot and claim self defense, because the other person pulled a gun . It will of course be up to the jury to decide on that, but it's definitely part of the upcoming jury instructions
1:26:36 Someone in chat said Sarah lied from the start, saying she was 90 lb but her arrest records stated 140 lb. I wonder if the arrest record just took that off her drivers license because no way she weighed 140. She was very tiny the day this happened. You can see in the video of her talking outside her apartment to the police how thin she was. That doesn’t surprise me the way she drank though as many alcoholics don’t eat much.
The jury will have gotten a good perspective of the size of the suitcase especially as it had been pointed out that Jorge and Sarah were roughly the same size. Having her stand by the suitcase mid trial was very affective
The fact that ONE of Sarah's excuses for going upstairs while Jorge was in the suitcase, was to "hide in the shower" for the game of "hide n seek". So she was CLEARLY EXPECTING him to "come find her". For this reason i dont feel battered womens syndrome defense is appropriate.
Sarshs brain is pickled everyone! End stage chronic alcoholism; she looks like she has cirrhosis/pancreatic issues. She remembers NOTHING except beating him w/ the bat, which I think she did early on. She let his regain consciousness, and we know the rest. Her memory is fried, her cognitive functions are badly compromised, and I don't believe she's even competent to stand trial. I do believe she didn't expect him to die, but rather than tell the truth, all she's done is attempt to protect her ego. Its so fragile, the slightest criticism topples it.
One of the most telling parts of Ms. Boones story other than it doesn't sound 100 percent believable is that while testifying she showed 0 remorse, 0 feeling, 0 regret. Non-Apologetic. Unbelievable, I thought he was going to get out so I left him in the suitcase while he was telling me he couldn't breath, saying please let me out and I went upstairs to go to bed. Woke up found him purple in the suit case. No intent my ass.
Jorge only weighed 103 pounds and She weighed a little less than him. My goodness, they were both very thin. My guess is they favored alcohol over food. I believe she did well on the stand, surprisingly.
Yet another lie by Sarah… she says he ate like a horse and couldn’t gain weight, then she talks about cooking steak and trying to get him to eat. Which is it Sarah???? 🙄
can someone explain how if she the main aggressor she also abused Brian so why would the judge allow this they both abused each-other and she hit her ex I’m confused
I had a good laugh when she tried to blame Brian, her ex-husband, for HER not taking his call in the morning. Apparently Brian does not understand that she is doing '"things" and looking for a job. She did well on the stand when compared to Charlie Adelson.
If Sarah was so afraid of Jorge, WHY.. would she stay and videotape your boyfriend destroying your tv with a baseball bat and just stand there?? In the words of Camille Vasquez…. “ You weren’t afraid of him at all were you??”
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And I am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America🇺🇸❤️
Hello, how do you achieve such biweekly returns? As a single parent i haven't been able to get my own house due to financial struggles, but my faith in God remains strong.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Ann Larson) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
MODS: you are responsible for moderating, and enabling an environment that is capable of accommodating differing views.Should not have to continually block enforcers of views.
Of course Sarah stayed calm and consistent- she’s had FOUR YEARS TO PRACTICE AND PREPARE for her debut!!!
Because she’s a psychopath!!!
She doesn’t take any responsibility for not letting him out, abused or not she hasn’t any compassion or empathy.
@@lorihall3411 and the prosecutor was USELESS
@@SLYDIT yes, he could have called her out 100 times, Ms Boone you intentionally left George in the suit case to teach him a lesson, didn't you! You were mad about those women on the phone weren't you, you wanted him to pay didn't you.?
@@joda7221 Let's all hope he recalls her during rebuttal. The big problem though is that *"I think"* they can only address rebuttals based on new evidence. And the only new evidence came from anybody that spoke after her!!
"I hope her jail cell is the size of a suitcase."
I thought Sarah came across as very cold and uncaring.
Same. She could've at least squeezed out a tear when she was going on and on about how much she loved him. 😂
If she really loved him she would have been emotional having to mess around with suitcase! If it were me I’d be sobbing and probably faint! 😵💫🫣
Because she is. She showed more emotion about HER injury than Jorge’s death and what this has done to her son. She uses her son for sympathy when she totally ignored him and her custody arrangement
Guilty of 2nd Degree Murder. If she was that afraid of Jorge, she would have left the house or called 911. What did she do? She went to sleep!
With all do respect, this is outdated thinking in regards to cycles of inter-partner violence/abuse.
@NorthStarr0216 With all due respect, he was zipped up in a suitcase begging to be let out cause he couldn't breathe. Sarah claiming she was afraid and going to bed is horse sh$t
That may be well and true but she also said that once she had his hand secured back inside the suitcase after gouging it and his body with the bat, that she felt "safe." So she cannot have it both ways and I was shocked that the prosecutor missed that. He was not very effective.
@@NorthStarr0216the idea of being so much in fear for your life that you go upstairs, tuck yourself in bed and go to sleep is so outrageous. It’s such an egregious affront to the truth that it matters not about what people think of how a DV victim acts there is no update and I cannot foresee an update ever being realised to the non correlation of the fear response and falling asleep.
Let’s forget that argument though. Let’s go a step beyond it - if she felt so relieved that he was trapped in the suitcase and the following relief was to such an extent that she relaxed so totally that she fell asleep; then surely that could only result from feeling so secure in the knowledge that he COULD NOT escape.
And that then begs the question- if she feared that his anger was ever increasing the longer he stayed in that suitcase - at what point would she have felt comfortable letting him out? It would seem the answer would be never. And if that’s the case, the fact that she did not invite help to get him out of the case while she “fled” then the only logical outcome is that he languishes in that suitcase. If not from lack of oxygen then from malnutrition. And then, even if she was to water and feed him inside the suitcase, that would mean he would be held captive for the foreseeable future.
None of it works. NONE of it.
If she had left the house and called someone- Brian, 911, ANYONE to get him out of the suitcase immediately after she zipped him in and he died in between that time…I could have some sympathy for this woman.
Even with the case as it is - if she had shown a shred of regret, a ‘scintilla’ of remorse that Jorge ended up dead I could have some sympathy for her but she just DOESNT CARE that he died. She was ‘aghast’ not upset, not horrified, not freaked out- aghast. That suggests that she was appalled. Appalled at that fact that he had dared to die on her. Not devastation nor anguish. She was flabbergasted. They are all “me”Emotions. She did not express one emotion that involves the consideration of the suffering of the other person.
She’s had the cops called so many times do way was that night any different. She knew he wasn’t getting out and was never in danger that night. The other times doesn’t matter it’s only that night !! And she killed him
She said she called Brian from bed upstairs. She then said she didn’t answer Brian the next morning because her phone was downstairs.
Woman couldn’t lie straight in bed, and would adamantly tell you she didn’t say that even though you hear the words from her own mouth
This was an intentional act after Jorge passed out. No telling how badly she had to hurt him to get him in the suitcase.
Agree
@@periyoung487 the coroner said there were marks all over him that Sarah couldn't explain to the police.
Great point, by your guest, he was too weak to threaten her, he needed her help to get out her couldn’t breathe anymore…RIP Jorge, great show! Joel! ❤️🙏🤗
Bottom line is she had all night to call the police if she was frightened and afraid! She never called anyone for help ! He’s in a suitcase and she never asked never called anyone for help ! The only one asking for help was the real victim in the suitcase !
I kept waiting for her to say how devastated she was to find him dead. Never happened. She was “aghast”.
I personally love the word aghast and unlike the guests tonight, I have used it in normal conversation. Just saying. But yea, "devasted" should have also been on her Police Bingo card.
I also have and would use the word aghast - one might be aghast at their dog shitting outside the neighbours gate and realising they have no poo bags on them.
One lmight be aghast at discovering the neighbour is having an affair.
The level of shock indicated by the word aghast is almost a superficial one with a layer of disgust/contempt.
@@Moonchild14928 It sounded to me more like:” How dare he die on her and put her in this mess.”
So I am a DV survivor and can only talk from my experience but SB does not come across as a victim. When I was in my relationship I would never ever retaliate against my partner in fear of making it worse. I hid it from everyone including my family for 6 years I would have never told his family, neighbours etc like she did as again I was in fear of repercussions terrified of it!! When SB says she tried to placate him with puzzles etc I don’t understand that. Tge night it happened she was on the phone in the background shouting about him choking her and that was early on in the night but that didn’t anger him then?? Plus she is saying that both neighbours are lying, she saying the detective is lying re the phone call so she’s saying all these people are lying and she’s telling the truth where the only actual evidence we have is her lying over and over and the jury are now suppose to believe that!!!!
I can only pray the prosecution can bring these points together in his closing statements.
I don’t know if I missed it if they did, but why didn’t anyone ask Sarah why she didn’t record the 11 minutes between the two videos of him actually threatening her instead of just recording her taunting him…that’s very suspicious to me.
good point !!!
@@ordinaryman2299If he was threatening her life, why not record that…. It didn’t happen… that’s why she didn’t record it. She was probably pouring a glass of wine and charging her phone AND cussing him out those 11 minutes…. 😒
The prosecution did mention it. She said she doesn't know/remember.
I think that is a critical question to ask her. It seems sadistic to want a video unless for evidence.
She is a huge liar
I don’t think the prosecution went hard enough on her
I suppose they didn't want to appear insensitive to a poor wee battered maiden
What Sarah Boone did to Jorge is off the charts cruel. No jury should be putting her back on the streets for a very long time. And, Brian Boone, keep your son away from this nut! She is toxic and dangerous.
In her police interview Sarah kept loudly swearing "on her SON's Life" that she didn't lay a hand on him. I pray he doesn't see that now.
He will definitely see it. He knows she doesn't care about him. He hasn't spoken to her since she's been in jail. Teenagers are very aware.
She went to sleep! And she was afraid that he was going to kill her?
I think she passed out 🤷🏼♀️✌️
And left an opening for him to get out
Correction: she was TERRIFIED... (she's such a liar).... but yet she went upstairs and slept for 12 hours
@@nihilismistheonlyway4680 how do you explain her leg injury and black eye 🤷🏼♀️ - asking fir a friend??
If he had really threatened her life and she was afraid he was gonna get out and kill her she would have left and called 911. Nothing has ever stopped her from calling 911 in the past. But no…. I’ll just fall up the stairs & pass out. 🙄
After watching and listening to-I believe Jorge is the victim and Sarah the aggressor in this relationship. Her injuries could have occurred during her abuse of Jorge. Her ex said she’s a violent drunk and why he left.
I've been on jury 3 times. What I rememeber the most is that when we went to deliberation phase, 1st thing we shared was what evidence stood out the most to each of us.
Another question? Do DV victims control their abuser‘s life as much as she did??????
I believe DV victims can attempt to control their environments so as not to inflame abusers. I’m not saying she wasn’t controlling, but potentially, codependency leads to abuse, and codependents do attempt to control and “fix” things. Not saying that’s the case here, bc it’s hard to determine she was in imminent danger. I’m not sold on that danger
Exactly! There is a saying: believe half of what you see and none of what you hear. The video evidence alone should send her away for a long, long time - both her own and the body cams. She left Jorge zipped up in a suitcase. Murder 2 seems to fit the bill.
@@chantallennox1201 We just have to hope that the Jury pays strict attention to what the charge itself reads, and not that she killed him in any of the ways that come wit a murder charge, premeditated, intentional, etc.
LIFE IN PRISON /NO PAROLE
I do believe that Sarah was blackout drunk at the time of the crime. That, of course, is no excuse.
Yes, I agree. It is the exact same scenario as with Karen Read. The problem with the Read case stems from that Prosecutors have overcharged her by making it intentional. That is so plainly obvious as to be stupid. At least they haven't done that here. However, their cross was as weak as double-watered-down-tomato-soup. They've had 4 years to prepare and her lawyer has only had a month. He has been rightfully chastised for some of his shenanigans, but he is doing a good job otherwise.
She held the camera very still for someone who was "black out drunk"
@@zackeze3478cell phone tripod
@@zackeze3478 Do you really think she'd have relinquished her phone knowing that she'd taped it? She's not very smart, granted but she's been arrested enough to be wiser than that.
I didnt see her as beaten down. I saw her as controlling.
The states cross examination was a total disaster. Totally ineffective and failed to pick up on her lies and challenge them on the spot...AND they failed to object to all the leading questions from the defense
Sarah has flat affect because she is on the psychopath scale. I'd love to know her rating.
Her husband Brian said she is the one that gets violent. She did it with him constantly when they were together. She presents herself as the one that wears the pants in all relationships and the husband verified this.
I hope Brian is called as a rebuttal witness and is asked about her drinking problem and the abuse she inflicted on him
He also said Sarah's injuries were from Jorge trying to defend himself.
NO DV victim would taunt their abuser and do what she did by locking him up and then going off to sleep comfortably one floor above the person, your abuser that will take your life once he is freed. The woman on the jury that went through this will know this better than anyone.
Why didn’t the prosecution object to the defence’s constant leading of Sarah Boone.
Good question!!!
He was essentially testifying. WTF
If I were a prosecutor and I thought the defendant was lying about DV, I would want a DV survivor on the jury. Being one myself, I can tell if someone is being truthful about it or exaggerating it for sympathy. True survivors HATE people who lie about it.
Being a recovering alcoholic, I also believe that people who are NEVER violent, do not become violent in the haze.
george has no history od DV before sarah, so what is it about her ???
What disappointed me about cross examination was that SB testified that Jorge threatened her life while he was in the suitcase and that she feared him, yet when she talked to the police the next day she said that she assumed he’d get out of the suitcase on his own and that he’d go upstairs and they’d have “intimate relations”. If she was so fearful, I don’t think she’d be interested in getting intimate…. I wonder why Will Jay didn’t ask her about that.. 🤷♀️
Exactly, I think everything she said on the stand was made up.
I may be giving the prosecution too much credit but I think they will make these arguments in closing without giving her the opportunity to explain the contradictions on the stand.
Does a Narcissist ever show remorse????
Incapable of it. They only turn on crocodile tears for their own gain
Nope
With what they're letting Defense get away with and how State is, I won't be surprised if it's another Casey Anthony.
I got sick to my stomach when the prosecution rested. All I could think about was Casey Anthony.
My impression is that everyone in the court is just walking on egg shells trying to finish the case without Sarah Boone melting down and sacking another legal team. You have to humour the mad woman.
I hope the Judge throws the book at her, when she is convicted. There is hopefully a powerful rebuttal coming.
What in that cross would lead you think a powerful rebuttal is on the horizon? This is meant as an offense to the Prosecutor, not you.
@@govindagovindaji4662 Well I think they have all the Bodycam from when she had no problems calling the cops on him. Jumping for joy. The statements from several people that she drank from dawn to dusk and staggering through the neighborhood. From Brian that she gets aggressive when drinking. Her arrest when she choked Jorge and he had masks on his neck. Then telling him to dismiss the charges. There are so many lies. Still she was a victim of domestic violence, but it was mutual. It could be argued, he was in fear. The fact that there was no DV before he met Sarah. We will see.
He was never found guilty of domestic violence (Nolle Prosequi on the clerk's website) and it's disgusting the defense is up there smearing his name like he was and I think it should never be allowed in front of the jury. Anyone can get arrested for domestic violence, it's the cops tool to prevent tense situations from getting worse "out of an abundance of caution" and look up the Duluth model, it's what most police forces are trained on and it usually results in men being arrested with just an accusation of abuse. He may have been abusive but we'll never know because Sarah decided to play her sick fatal game with him by entrapping, beating, and suffocating him while laughing at him.
She had injury and a black eye 🤷🏼♀️✌️
Where's the proof that George did it?@@coffeecake1803
@@coffeecake1803 I’m just not convinced yet on the photos and no police report. In her words
@@sherylbarry9143On the pic with the black eye the look on her face was smug and arrogant. Any pic I’ve ever seen of injuries to an abused women, especially their face, they look sad and defeated and embarrassed. She looked proud of that black eye… just my opinion.
@@coffeecake1803 and she hadn't murdered him yet so he got a chance to tell his side of the story and the state didn't prosecute him. Maybe she drunkenly fell into the counter, maybe she stepped on a broken wine bottle... we don't know because she killed him so he doesn't get to speak. None of this adds up, she's a liar, has no credibility, and is a murderer
Sarah was blinking her eyes at a quick pace at certain times.
She also did those subtle smiles at her defense team as if to suggest she thought certain of her responses were 'well executed'. But since she is not facing the Jury, they would have missed those. Honestly, it was as if she was saying with her eyes and smile, "Wow, I did a good job with that lie, didn't I?" I am not convinced that Owens is an ethical attorney. He comes off as a lawyer who would coach a witness on lying which is not a good look. But this Jury did not and does not get to see how he behaved in all the motions hearings. I can't stand when he or any of his team pat her, but I don't like that in any criminal trial, nor do I like people to pat me for any reason.
I wish the State had questioned Sarah right up to the evening adjournment so that she could still be cross-examined tomorrow but with more surgical precision. There were so many more questions the state could have asked that would have better exposed her lies.
Totally. There would have been no downside of retaining her overnight, taken the time to confer as to how successful cross was, check the socials for commentary like this video/gallery reaction/reviewing the stream with an eye to adjusting strategy, even if only to dismiss her first thing next day.
I thought she did okay but I don’t know how anyone believes her story during the 11 minutes.
I thought the prosecutor was building up to prove she was doing something else during those 11 minutes (texting, taking pictures) instead of Jorge threatening her. But it was just a nothingburger.
I love that Joel always thanks and acknowledges his wifey / COE… good job Carm ❤
How does her ludicrous story constitute a scintilla of evidence? It was her words, likely just lies. Where's the evidence that Jorge threatened her?
And how long was she with this guy who was so abusive?
And that his hand was out? I don’t believe his hand came out!
Sarah has zero empathy and does not garner sympathy.
If her and Jorge did a 1000 pc puzzle from start to 1 pc left that day being wasted that would be some feat !
FYI: The only reason her ex let her have her son certain days that was part of the agreement of custody by the Family Court. Even up to this trial, while in custody, she had video/zoom visits.
There was no overt act!!! What a crock
Absolutely no remorse, not one tear! I wish the state would have asked more damning questions to impeach her. I just pray the jury sees through her lies.
She lied on direct and said Jorge was enjoying his off day from work,and then later said he was on the computer looking for a job
I caught that too!!! Then she tried to backtrack and say his current job was unstable 🤨
And she also said Jorge eats like a horse then later on said she cooked steak and baked potatoes and was trying to get him to eat… which one is it a Sarah??? 🙄
Also, she lied about that day...first the has fun & enjoying the day & and under cross...he got angry off & on. Prosecutor caught her on that.
What is inconsistent about doing a job search on your day off?
well, to be honest both can be true. I have been out of work at times and part of the day looking on job sites for a job and also spending part of the day enjoying the free time. Also, i have found the act of looking for a new job in and of itself, somewhat enjoyqble
The guy on panel is obviously well versed in prosecuting things. Uncivil law saying “worse. Cross. Ever.” means he’s mostly looking for fireworks for his channel rather than having *any* real courtroom experience. Kurt would have gone up and verbally hammered a woman who clearly was a dv victim. Now, I don’t think she gets off here and I whole heartedly also wanted to see her get her ass handed to her, but I’m not a lawyer. 😂
I don’t look for the prosecution to come back strong & see her locked up for life. They are lackluster for sure.
The relationship seems like it was a hot mess based on what she testified.
Jorge wasn't threatening her while she was recording him in the suitcase and she was the one being mean and confrontational IMHO.
I believe there is a mental health issue with SB for sure.
Great point, by your guest, he was too weak to threaten her, he needed her help to get out her couldn’t breathe anymore…RIP Jorge
If she was worried about him getting out of the suitcase & hurting her, why would she go upstairs & go to sleep(leaving herself vulnerable while sleeping)???? Why wouldn’t she just leave the house if she thought he was going to get out & hurt her?
Replay) If Sarah was fearfully scared of Jorge, if he got out, why not call the police because she truly believed he was going to get out of it & terribly harm her, but goes to sleep? If I was scared I couldn’t sleep! Oh please, I don’t think she cared at that point what happened to him, or she would have cared more about him saying he couldn’t breathe…imo she’s guilty.
Actually she admits that she didn't go right to sleep. She went upstairs while he was still in suitcase to call her ex-husband. Of course he was still calling her name. Then she goes to sleep and not call police? She wasn't afraid of him
I agree with the chat, she doesn't remember a thing about that night.
Ryan gets where the State is coming from in the cross. Uncivil Law can go kick rocks.
Im with u Joel! I KNOW his fingers never came out of suitcase!! Im so MAD she was allowed to LIE IMO!!!
1:03:34 I could listen to Susan making that shutter sound all day long. I would buy its soundtrack too. Does she do other sounds? Perfecto~!
She's not good at math. That was apparent when the Prosecutor ask about the percentage of her alcohol level in the morning, calculating the ME's estimate alcohol blood level over time. She didn't understand how he came up with that % number after she woke up. Cause she was claiming she was still a lil intoxicated when she woke the next day. Nah, she was hungover.
@@pattygrantham3967 so dehydrated that she drank from the hose outlet.
All I heard this chat saying was: why didnt she just leave. Well that is setting DV awareness back 100 years. If you want to know why ppl are blocked MODS, this is why. Well said Susan Constantine.
Great show Joel and COE😊
Sarah's toast. (Suit)case closed!
i sure hope so !!!
Y s She-was smiling when she was at the stand staring at her in the court room sb
That prosecution SUCKS
Would LOVE to see Georgia Cappelman get ahold of her!
@@JackieOlantern for me it would be Lindsey Blake, she rocked in the Chad Daybell case.
Joe, defendants are often told to speak directly to the jury. It does often look odd, especially when they dont do it at other times.
A drunk 100 pound man locked in a suitcase is not a threat! 😡 justice for Jorge who is not here to defend himself 😢
Why is it that somehow everyone on every panel I watched so far regarding this trial is missing the vital part of the self defence instructions that you cannot claim self defense if you are the instigator. Jorge's threatening overt act (him starting to get out of the suitcase and threatening her) is the direct response to Sarah's act of zipping him in there and refusing to let him out (which is false imprisonment, a felony), Like Will Jay said, you can't point a gun at someone and then, when that someone also pulls a gun, shoot and claim self defense, because the other person pulled a gun . It will of course be up to the jury to decide on that, but it's definitely part of the upcoming jury instructions
No . Sarah is controlling
Very!!!
1:26:36 Someone in chat said Sarah lied from the start, saying she was 90 lb but her arrest records stated 140 lb. I wonder if the arrest record just took that off her drivers license because no way she weighed 140. She was very tiny the day this happened. You can see in the video of her talking outside her apartment to the police how thin she was. That doesn’t surprise me the way she drank though as many alcoholics don’t eat much.
Have prosecutors brought up the video of Sarah printing information on “How to be a victim”?
Has anyone else looked at the actual suitcase video to see the zipper components are NOT where Sarah placed them in her court demonstration?
His hand protruding is part of the "overt act" correct?🤔
The jury will have gotten a good perspective of the size of the suitcase especially as it had been pointed out that Jorge and Sarah were roughly the same size. Having her stand by the suitcase mid trial was very affective
The fact that ONE of Sarah's excuses for going upstairs while Jorge was in the suitcase, was to "hide in the shower" for the game of "hide n seek". So she was CLEARLY EXPECTING him to "come find her". For this reason i dont feel battered womens syndrome defense is appropriate.
This lady in the green is fooled by Sarah’s bs.
Or perhaps she can analyze all the different complexities and hold space for all of it.
I hope the State closing arguments and rebuttal are 100% better than opening arguments. If not, the defense might win!!
Cracks me up how Sarah says her last name: Bouuuune.
I am so confused. In the original pictures wasn't the original suitcase Jorge was in black and not Teal? Anyone else see this?
Sarshs brain is pickled everyone! End stage chronic alcoholism; she looks like she has cirrhosis/pancreatic issues. She remembers NOTHING except beating him w/ the bat, which I think she did early on. She let his regain consciousness, and we know the rest. Her memory is fried, her cognitive functions are badly compromised, and I don't believe she's even competent to stand trial. I do believe she didn't expect him to die, but rather than tell the truth, all she's done is attempt to protect her ego. Its so fragile, the slightest criticism topples it.
She told police she went upstairs, waiting for him to come up for them to be intimate wait, what?
One of the most telling parts of Ms. Boones story other than it doesn't sound 100 percent believable is that while testifying she showed 0 remorse, 0 feeling, 0 regret. Non-Apologetic. Unbelievable, I thought he was going to get out so I left him in the suitcase while he was telling me he couldn't breath, saying please let me out and I went upstairs to go to bed. Woke up found him purple in the suit case. No intent my ass.
Remeber the O.j.glove. If it doesn't fit you must acquit.
Jorge only weighed 103 pounds and She weighed a little less than him. My goodness, they were both very thin. My guess is they favored alcohol over food.
I believe she did well on the stand, surprisingly.
Yet another lie by Sarah… she says he ate like a horse and couldn’t gain weight, then she talks about cooking steak and trying to get him to eat. Which is it Sarah???? 🙄
can someone explain how if she the main aggressor she also abused Brian so why would the judge allow this they both abused each-other and she hit her ex I’m confused
She had a battered spouse syndrome book on the defense table! Sarah is playing right in front of everyone's face!
Why was the prosecution a bit distance from questioning her on the stand ?
@@alicewaggle6803 Maybe they don’t have to… and it would lead nowhere. They have so much evidence to impeach her statements in rebuttal.
I had a good laugh when she tried to blame Brian, her ex-husband, for HER not taking his call in the morning. Apparently Brian does not understand that she is doing '"things" and looking for a job.
She did well on the stand when compared to Charlie Adelson.
I'm sure Sarah's lawyer told her, several times, to remain very calm. She almost looked drugged.
Her younger brother is alive, in the Marine Corps. She lost father, mother, grandma, grandpa.
If Sarah was so afraid of Jorge, WHY.. would she stay and videotape your boyfriend destroying your tv with a baseball bat and just stand there?? In the words of Camille Vasquez….
“ You weren’t afraid of him at all were you??”
GLORY!!!'m favoured, $140K every 3weeks! And I am retired i can now give back to the locals in my community and also support God's work and the church. God bless America🇺🇸❤️
Hello, how do you achieve such biweekly returns? As a single parent i haven't been able to get my own house due to financial struggles, but my faith in God remains strong.
Excuse me for real?,how is that
possible I have struggling
financially, how was that possible?
Thanks to my co-worker whom God used to give a great opportunity of crossing paths with 'Mrs ELIZABETH ANN LARSON'.
YES!!! That's exactly her name (Elizabeth Ann Larson) so many people have recommended highly about her and am just starting with her 😊 from Brisbane Australia🇦🇺
I have heard a lot of wonderful things about Elizabeth Ann on the news but didn't believe it until now. I'm definitely trying her out
Why didn't they bring the exhusband back to testify about the abuse Sarah inflicted on him...hense the divorce!
I agree too that not all DV displays the same in each situation A lot of factors to apply. You are “formed” by the abuse
Wasn't happy with the prosecution cross exsamation of Sarah..I pray to god we Don't have another outcome like Casey Anthony..
It was rehearsed. when cross came along. She wasn’t rehearsed
Sarahs self esteem is extremely high
Ryan is right,less is more.
Agree. Plus we have more to come.
??? Do you all notice Detective Koepsil’s increased breathing rate during some questions? She was quite stressed imho. Love from Nova Scotia!
MODS: you are responsible for moderating, and enabling an environment that is capable of accommodating differing views.Should not have to continually block enforcers of views.
Putting him in took at least 10 minutes of hard labor.
I thought the state was building up to proving she was texting and taking pictures during the 11 minutes between the 2 videos. But then...nothing.
I thought she was boring as heck and unbelievable.
But he the prosecutor didn't dump the box of paper in front of the jury, right?