Lubitel 2, Soviet TLR, loading with 120 film,Fomapan 200

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 27

  • @neilpiper9889
    @neilpiper9889 4 года назад +2

    I used to be a wedding photographer in the 1960s using 2 Yashica Mat Tlrs. We had a Lubitel 2 as a standby in case one of the Yashicas broke down, which of course they never did. The Lubitel was never used.
    I have bought one again now and I like it a lot.

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  4 года назад

      Hi, the Yashica TLRs are legendary and very desirable, the Lubital is far more agricultural, good cameras if there are no light leaks..

  • @reading2495
    @reading2495 Год назад +1

    This video shows examples of photos taken with the original camera. "TLR Lubitel 2 cameras, Lubitel 166U examples of black and white photos" Watch and be amazed!

  • @adamm4926
    @adamm4926 4 года назад +4

    I adore using my Lubitel 2...... so simple and light... :)

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  4 года назад +1

      A very underated and misunderstood camera, it was built for the masses, simple to use and so affordable, thanks for sharing....

  • @andybeisel8205
    @andybeisel8205 3 года назад +1

    I just picked one of these up. I’ll let you know how it goes. Thanks for the video!

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  3 года назад

      Hi, you are most welcome, yes please, keep us posted....

    • @andybeisel8205
      @andybeisel8205 3 года назад +1

      @@thephotographersbag I got my film back from the Lubetel 2. There are some beginnner mistakes on a few of the 12 shots, including a double exposure accident (classic!). But overall, the shots turned out really nice. I really enjoyed using this camera. Simple and light. The only con is that focusing can be a pain sometimes since the ground glass is so small (as is the magnifier). But it was so cheap. The camera cost me the same as two rolls of 120.

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  3 года назад +1

      Hi, sounds like a good camera, they are notorious for light leaks, a real bargain and quite underestimated, hope you keep using it, they are great fun....

  • @Goat.Herder
    @Goat.Herder 2 года назад +1

    Thanks for this, I've got something similar and had no idea how to load it!

  • @paultaylorphotography9499
    @paultaylorphotography9499 3 года назад +1

    Brilliant thanks got one winging it’s way slowly from old blighty to NZ ❤️📷❤️

  • @jeffreypetchharrison4363
    @jeffreypetchharrison4363 3 года назад +1

    the first one they made was the komsomolets, i have all of the types they made all boxed apart from one .. jeff

  • @andrewwilkin1923
    @andrewwilkin1923 5 лет назад +1

    Not the finest TLR, had one back in the day. Would recommend keeping in it's case as mine was prone to light leaks. Also used a cable release as the shutter cocking lever is very close to the shutter release when cocked. Found my thumb could impede the shutter lever releasing. Focussing can be tricky with the tiny magnifier. Your mileage may vary due to Soviet quality control, look forward to your results.

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  5 лет назад

      Thanks for the tips, especially the light leaks, agree with you re the shutter release as I have sausage fingers anyway

  • @U.Boonmee
    @U.Boonmee 13 дней назад

    Does Lubitel 2 use any batteries?

  • @captainbackflash
    @captainbackflash 3 года назад +1

    Actualy, you can buy an E-type for 2000pound. At least one in the condition of 2000pound!

  • @chronicfish
    @chronicfish 3 года назад +1

    May I ask why you changed the metal spool to a plastic one?

    • @thephotographersbag
      @thephotographersbag  3 года назад +2

      Hi, I keep the metal spools separately from the plastic ones, I also use a daylight loading tank and don't want chemicals getting on the metal reels, if you use a firm to develop you won't get the metal reel back normally.....

    • @chronicfish
      @chronicfish 3 года назад

      @@thephotographersbag makes sense. thank you for replying!

  • @ianhand5006
    @ianhand5006 5 лет назад +1

    It looks like it cost £6 19s and 6p, which is £6.97 1/2 pence in today’s money.

  • @BharzahAsmaraTarotReader
    @BharzahAsmaraTarotReader 2 года назад +1

    Tolok