I like the video, the vibe and the fact that you kept it to an interesting piece in under 5 minutes. But I agree with FradeJJ on the filter. Another thing I'd suggest is to tone down the halation effect here. In the whole clip, but particularly in the shots at 0:56, it's more distrating than anything else. When it's over the top, it takes a shot from a 'film look' to an overly processed digital look
Please don't ruin the photo showcase with such an ugly video noise filter. You made so much effort to capture every photo and in the end made them unwatchable. Respect for the discription of feel of film photography
I don't mind a frame around the outside or maybe a subt effect but it's the pulsating light/dark over the shots that kill it for me. Really makes it hard to look at and appreciate any of the shots.
Im 67 yrs old and have been shooting film since was I 12 yrs old..Reflecting 55 years 0f film experience.. I work for over 40 years producing corporate shows using digital world lights camera action. So I understand the full scope of lazy ass digital shortcuts for high production runs.. I run circles around the young turks that are jerks on the set... Your big mistake on cost was shooting Color. Most all savvy street photogs shooting silver use B$W film. Singular subject more impact. Using a lab and high dollar TRI X cost about $1 usd per shot finished .. that includes 36 exposures fully processed, scanned and sleeved negatives. Including 31/2 x5 prints all mailed back from Richard lab Cali .. Instant gratification your looking for comes when you process the FILM at HOME . Takes about 15 to 30 minutes and I can do 5 120s or 10 35mm rolls at a time. If i want them scanned do it at home or drop off at lab cost about $10 to $12.../ scanning kills the entire painting with light shooting analog silver experience. So go spend a few thousand $$$ on a plastic digital camera.. then a a few $$$ thousand on a 20 x 24 printer and the PAPER rolls to slabb some INK on top of the overpriced copy paper.. .. .. and dont forget the INK $$$$$$$$$$$, then lash yourself to a computer all day using some ASIAN techs photo shop program. THATS HIS ART NOT YOURS creating something that is ALL FAKE digital facade tones and density. Nothing but a radical manipulation of the original LIGHT on a SQUARE pixel chip...what a joke !! lazy ass DIGITAL HAS KILLED THE TRUE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY... shooting silver is the only way for true balance in nature..go into the darkroom for ultimate gratification and WAYY less cost than digital propaganda when comparing apples to apples..Producing a silver gelatin on fiber base paper 20 x 24 print in the darkroom vs printing JAMMED JUNK INK JOB scanning/ machine ink printing a semblance of what once was. The darkroom route creates more of your true ART balance with nature.. I use 1960s and 1970s PENTAX original spotmatics. Purchase price $20 to 75$ . METAL TANK CONSTRUCTION that still work PERFECT 50 years later .. I DOUBT any DIGITAL CAMERA will still perform like new after 50 to 60 years.. thats why they have those DIGITAL FRAME counters letting the buyer know the newer digital camera is almost worn out according to manufactures specs..
I like the video, the vibe and the fact that you kept it to an interesting piece in under 5 minutes. But I agree with FradeJJ on the filter.
Another thing I'd suggest is to tone down the halation effect here. In the whole clip, but particularly in the shots at 0:56, it's more distrating than anything else. When it's over the top, it takes a shot from a 'film look' to an overly processed digital look
"Let me know in comments if you EVER shot film" .... you made me feel old now and I'm not even 40.
Please don't ruin the photo showcase with such an ugly video noise filter. You made so much effort to capture every photo and in the end made them unwatchable.
Respect for the discription of feel of film photography
I don't mind a frame around the outside or maybe a subt effect but it's the pulsating light/dark over the shots that kill it for me. Really makes it hard to look at and appreciate any of the shots.
Im 67 yrs old and have been shooting film since was I 12 yrs old..Reflecting 55 years 0f film experience.. I work for over 40 years producing corporate shows using digital world lights camera action. So I understand the full scope of lazy ass digital shortcuts for high production runs.. I run circles around the young turks that are jerks on the set... Your big mistake on cost was shooting Color. Most all savvy street photogs shooting silver use B$W film. Singular subject more impact. Using a lab and high dollar TRI X cost about $1 usd per shot finished .. that includes 36 exposures fully processed, scanned and sleeved negatives. Including 31/2 x5 prints all mailed back from Richard lab Cali .. Instant gratification your looking for comes when you process the FILM at HOME . Takes about 15 to 30 minutes and I can do 5 120s or 10 35mm rolls at a time. If i want them scanned do it at home or drop off at lab cost about $10 to $12.../ scanning kills the entire painting with light shooting analog silver experience. So go spend a few thousand $$$ on a plastic digital camera.. then a a few $$$ thousand on a 20 x 24 printer and the PAPER rolls to slabb some INK on top of the overpriced copy paper.. .. .. and dont forget the INK $$$$$$$$$$$, then lash yourself to a computer all day using some ASIAN techs photo shop program. THATS HIS ART NOT YOURS creating something that is ALL FAKE digital facade tones and density. Nothing but a radical manipulation of the original LIGHT on a SQUARE pixel chip...what a joke !! lazy ass DIGITAL HAS KILLED THE TRUE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY... shooting silver is the only way for true balance in nature..go into the darkroom for ultimate gratification and WAYY less cost than digital propaganda when comparing apples to apples..Producing a silver gelatin on fiber base paper 20 x 24 print in the darkroom vs printing JAMMED JUNK INK JOB scanning/ machine ink printing a semblance of what once was. The darkroom route creates more of your true ART balance with nature.. I use 1960s and 1970s PENTAX original spotmatics. Purchase price $20 to 75$ . METAL TANK CONSTRUCTION that still work PERFECT 50 years later .. I DOUBT any DIGITAL CAMERA will still perform like new after 50 to 60 years.. thats why they have those DIGITAL FRAME counters letting the buyer know the newer digital camera is almost worn out according to manufactures specs..