Sergeant And Idiot Cop Get Owned! Unlawful Search Denied And ID Refusal! First Amendment Audit Fail
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- #shorts
Sergeant And Idiot Cop Get Owned! Unlawful Search Denied And ID Refusal! First Amendment Audit Fail
Welcome to the channel!
Join me by clicking SUBSCRIBE!
With this channel, I hope to provide value to the community by providing my commentary and ideas over the top of videos that have been released online. You may find unique reactions to audit clips, civilians owning cops, ID refusals, I don't answer questions, police corruption, dirty cops, and much more!
Don't forget to support the channel to help these videos get out there that show the police corruption and how many dirty, tyrant cops we have receiving and taking money from the taxpayers!
Help spread these videos to bring awareness to the people so that they know how to defend themselves from tyrant cops and help end police misconduct.
Tulare County Cop Watch - • 🔵🔴Guy that knows his r...
Fair Use Notice This video may contain copyrighted material, the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review, and news reporting, which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Notwithstanding the provisions of Sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review, and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.
#police #cops #LEO #idrefusal #copgetsowned #firstamendmentaudits #copdismissed #rookiecop #policeharassment #dismissed #4thAmendment #copwatch #Trespassing #Dismissed #copdismissed #rookiecops #1aAudit #Cop #Police #copsowned #1stamendmentaudit #Trespassing #4thamendment #5thamendment #walkofshame #1aAudits #Tyrants #Tyranny #copwatcher #CopsGetOwned #CopsGettingOwned #lawenforcement
Don't forget to help these videos get out there and expose the tyrant officers and government that try to avoid accountability by hitting the Like button and leaving a comment with your thoughts on the video!
How many civilians do you think these Cops have already violated their rights without them even knowing?
Click Link In The Video To See The Full Interaction!
ruclips.net/channel/UCL_V76wPXDYkvAG96koxwaQ
End Qualified Immunity!
Hey genius. Can your tell us what state is a "stamp and frisk" state?
You sound completely ignorant Mr. 14th amendment citizen
Talk your shit .... I made a typo
Cop hater, learn the law fool
Frauditors got to fraudit, lie, harass and grift.
AMERICA LETS START A END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY NOW PARTITION....AND REQUIRING TYRANTS TO COMMIT TO TWO YEAR CONSTITUTIONAL LAW, PSYCHOLOGY.
They just flat out lie every single time
I don’t think it’s a lie if they simply don’t know. Granted, the consequences are just as bad, and it needs to change. But, if someone asks you a question, and you unintentionally answer it incorrectly, surely you’re not lying, right? You’d just be wrong.
they just literally dont have proper training and schooling so they don't even know the law it's funny af.
the supreme court says they are allowed to lie.
@@Allikai314 No. Bullshit. They know. They always eventually admit it after they send people through the whole circus routine. They knew from the start.
No, you have to identify yourself.
That’s like the most authority they actually have at that moment, if you just ID yourself it’s all good. If you don’t you’re being suspicious and they’ll have reasonable cause to detain you.
Just say your full name and tell them your ID is at home, if you’re driving you need to show them a license, because they’re investigating if you’re legally able to drive.
To the author of this video, YATAH
"Am I being detained" "Uuuhhhhhh not ye-" "Good night gentlemen" Thats it.
Straight bye hoe 😂
Checkmate! He knew he was beat
Yea the cop wanted that, he knew the first cop fucked up and caused an issue and was given a free out
Even after defeat, they still have to get the last word in.
Yeah, that was DEFINITELY a "Awww, I HATE it when I run into people who know the law" moment.
"Get somebody out here with stripes on that sleeve!" That is a most excellent line.
My boss is a zebra.
And then that guy shows up! He's just as useless
Yeah but he doesn't even know the law. Incompetent AF
I don’t have a gun? People are so anti-cop, this is why terrible events like Sandy Hook Elementary School where 6 adults and 20 children were massacred!
This BS has to stop and stop now!
This wont stop until those cops stop going home.
Make a civilian army and challenge the current one to submit. Win the hearts and minds of the ones on the inside 😉
@@skylarc6063, Sadly I find that I agree with you!
I don't say it lightly,but they're not
gonna fix themselves.
They've earned the hate,it falls on them to do something about it.
@vanhill8831 agreed.i used to be back the blue but youtube has shown me there are too many bad apples in the tree. It's time to cut it down and plant a new one.
@@skylarc6063amen
When is it going to be mandatory for cops to actually know the law before they start demanding things of the public?
Lets be real, they knew the law and intentionally lied.
@@damiancarr168 i agree and in my book that makes them the crooks, and they should be dealt with accordingly.
There are too many laws to actually learn them all, and then you have a government that believes it can be interpreted 100 different ways. So, sure, let's have it your way and send them to law school, and then we pay them 3x the amount. You people are dumb and speak before thinking and actually knowing yourselves. I believe we call that hypocrisy...
They know the law. They're just allowed to lie about it.
So during training there is a course for general laws, constitutional laws and common traffic infractions. There is a big ass book we had to "memorize". A lot goes into becoming a LEO. But different departments have different standards.
2 questions:
1. Am I being detained?
(If not)
Have a good night..
(If so)
2. Lawyer.
That's all the interaction they need...
That first cop’s inner monologue is just the sound of a potato slowly rotating in a microwave
Why is that so true tho 😭. He'd be best buds with Patrick Star 😂
💀
He must be at peace then lol
And the second cop is a potato.
Goddamn this took me out 💀
It is the duty of all citizens to treat police with scorn and disrespect
They have been violating people's rights for so long that they think it is normal behavior. Even the supervisor thought he could
Usa has some of the most corrupt orwellian police
And that is the material point...they go by what has been done rather than what is the law on the books. You do have to have a reasonable suspicion or see a person in a commission of a crime.
They have teerible training. Its actually 50% not their fault.
They are doing exactly what they are trained to do.
@NobodySpecsh No. It's the fault of their training. It's 50% their fault
"if you value your job, get somebody out here with stripes on that sleeve" 😂😂😂
Stripe was not smarter.
Who trains these guys????
I think it's funny when Karens/Kens think they're being powerful when they say "you could lose your job!"
Uh, no. LEOs rarely get fired, even when they unalive someone without just cause. That has been slowly changing, but for asking someone for their ID? Nah, not gonna happen.
This is routine, to ask someone to ID themselves upon seeing a suspicious/unusual situation. Yes, in some areas they are prohibited unless they can articulate what it was they saw, but many times there IS something suspicious going on, and by "harassing" the person most of those crimes will be prevented. You have to be able to differentiate between being cuffed and taken to jail (which is legit harassment, if no crime was seen/reported), vs being asked for your ID, where you live, work, etc. Those are all legit questions because it gives the cops context about the situation.
I was rolling 😅
Uhh those are called Chevrons jail house lawyer
@@user-ut8bz1ic3l What's chevrons but V shaped stripes boot licker.
The officers can ask you for your ID. Whether you give it to them is dependent on whether you know your rights, and videos like this help every day citizens fight back against police tyranny. Grateful for your content.
The cop was right. It’s not a debate. It’s his 4th Amendment right.
It wasn't an unreasonable request, and therefore, legal.
@@kiillabytezan unreasonable request is all up to interpretation. So in all honesty, it's an opinion.
@@kingdomofme3681 An unreasonable request would be asking to do a cavity search in Times Square. So no, it's not an opinion. Figure it out numb nuts.
@@kiillabytezhow would you know if it wasn't an unreasonable request if the officer doesn't articulate reasonable suspicion? The lack of that articulation on its own is sketchy. If there was any reasonable suspicion to begin with, then why not say it?
@@spacedragon2753 You don't have to agree with a law, but you will abide by it.
He asked for a supervisor, and even the supervisor was trying to think of any reason to violate his rights
“Not yet” as a response is very telling of his intentions.
They have the right to ask for ID.
You have the right to refuse to show it .
The officer said you have to give it if and officer asks for it. That means it was not a request. Cannot check for weapons unless it is a legal detainment and there is a RAS of weapons. They cannot do it routinely. This is a corrupt organization.
A distinction too complex for these people
“If you value your job, get somebody with stripes on that sleeve!!!!”
That was a pretty badass thing to say!
Like, I could picture Bruce Willis saying that to a cop in a movie!
Even Bruce Willis doesnt have balls that big! Not all heroes wear capes, but almost NONE wear a badge.
@@aaronbechtel5034 You don't pay attention to reality... I truly resent your view. It is false.
@@rascalferretnah id say his view is pretty accurate. Not all heros wear capes but almost none of the heros we see are cops (wear a badge) cause most of them are part of the problem. Theres the few that arent problems, but they are an exception.
@@soranakumara1252 so wrong. So very wrong.
@@rascalferret and how am i wrong? I know every cop in the city i live in and the 5 cities around me as well. Out of over 100 officers, i can tell you right now, the majority are certainly not “heros”. I think your world view is the one lacking and wrong unless you wanna explain to me why you believe im wrong.
File a complaint against them both and get them retrained.
Dearest police officers of America, WE NEVER HIRED YOU to be judge, jury and abusive executioners, ever.
Lose the attitude, stop violating everyone's rights, and stop instigating fights with everyone you pull over.
You don't notice this guy's horrendous stand off attitude. You don't notice anyone acting the fool everywhere they go. There's an embarrassingly uncouth dirge of haughty and ungrateful people in this country. Are you gonna show courage to sort them out or wait until your grocery store is looted and burned by anti-police philosophy. I'm 'just walking in public'. People lie. Criminal empathy and police disrespect enables crime. To me, being an asshole is crime enough. You will live in the wasteland of everyone's fantasy...
Where's my comment.
Some officers. All aren't like this
@@minapane True. But about 70% are like that.
@calm713 My dad, brothers and I were in the 30%. So there's that.
You CAN ask
I CAN refuse
You can also go to jail.
Good.
I can use the new car ill buy with the lawsuit payout. @kiillabytez
@@geraldmiddlemist5060 Have fun with that, and don't pick up the soap while you're in there.
@@kiillabytez yawn. Of you are such a coward that you are afraid to stand up for your rights you don't deserve to be an American.
Hahahaha that question always sends me bro. "Are you detaining me?"..."no"...."bye" lol
Just another example of, if it wears a badge and belongs to the thin blue line gang, it's garbage.
You go around looking for a police officer to get a negative video. This is such a small percentage of the m over 378000 LEOs next time your getting robbed call an Internet camera activist.
@@michaelnolan5706
Shallow as a curb stone...Biff
@@michaelnolan5706 or just grab my best friend Mossberg and his cousins Smith and Wesson
Even the supervisors are incompetent.
Stupid people , with guns..lawless
Slightly yes but he was smart enough to let him leave.
And the pigs wonder why they are hated
@@kparsa1Yeah that doesn’t usually happen.
Well who do you think trained the kid?
shall not be infringed, brothers. start exercising our rights.
Cops don't understand that "I can ask for your ID at any time" goes alongside "I can say no"
He understood. He was hoping the citizen didn't focus on the verbiage.
Make public servants fearful again.
Facts
Need to take away qualified immunity
They fear accountability.
@hockeyguy820 No they don't. Because there is no accountability. Suing tax payers and getting hired somewhere else isn't working.
Not fearful BUT LAW ABIDING and respectful is all. 😊😂
If I’m free to go, then I’m free to stay.
If I'm free to go then I'm free to stay without being harassed for doing so. File complaints on both of them.
I said the same thing to your mom after I sodomized her! She liked it, but she was also really ashamed.
Do you have an actual purpose that may curtail your loose thoughts. These videos have no purpose other than knee jerk entertainment and half-baked comments...NONE of you will actively deter crime. You'll record it with an appendage phone for YT views. Just to walk in the spite lane and yet stand there instead...
@@rascalferret Deleted because RUclips monetizes everything.
@@DosntMatter666 Nobody knows that The Money itself is the ugly 7...
Wow…. Another cop who doesn’t know the law. Shocking
they do have a right to ask... they do not have a right to expect you to comply.
I'm baffled that police departments across the United States have not implemented training in dealing with First Amendment auditors. Police always claim ”For officer's safety”. Which is such a load of bull 💩.…. Citizens have a right not to be accosted or infringed upon!
if they are in fear of their safety and they have not articulated a crime, they need to back the f off.
Firefighter takes the job knowing they will run into a burning building.
These fuckers become cops so they look like they are heroes when they are actually not. They are so scared.
Terry vs Ohio
@@perfectlyharmless what crime or reasonable suspicion did he articulate? I know the case law, but this officer did not have the legal standard to stop this guy
@@perfectlyharmlessTerry v Ohio still requires a fucking crime, Hollow skull.
If all they are doing is stopping you because they want to, then they are breaking the fucking law.
Go chew on another tin of polish, Not like it could do any more damage.
"Am I detained?" Is like the magic words to keep your freedom. Good to know
The supervisor lied as much as Jr. Only difference is he knows he's lying, Jr. doesn't have a clue.
😅😅😅
the moment you asked if he was detaining you, he realized they fucked up. and he stepped away from that lawsuit. 😂😂😂
And they're LIARS TOO !!
Former cop and I am so ashamed. My work was performed for the safety of our citizens and I am proud of my service.
God bless you, sir.
That's correct officer bacon, it's not even a debate... it's called the US Constitution
Can you even read cursive writing... I dislike shills and algorithm garbage generation. Go be sus, then act a fool. Be proud scooter...
If I was to use the word Joo or Niqger in a sentence it would be wrong. But you just let the anti-police libel rip full out, and it's fun...
That youngster line humbled this officer’s tone almost immediately..
The second cop smiled of embarrassment because he knew that rookie cop went after the wrong guy. Cops need actual educational training before going out and ruining peoples lives....
"For our safety" = "our safety is more important than your safety"
Very good point
You're insane.
@rascalferret Two word response that communicates little. Care to elaborate?
@@brookcodyprice Sure. Your thinking is false or not sane. These clips are stripped like pulled pork into exactly what you Want. A pig sandwich. False interpretation of what was said and why. People can't be trusted to contain volitivity. Fact. This pedestrian was immediately combative to saying his name. Cop wears his. Who do you trust.
@@brookcodyprice You're erroneous. Not sane. False interpretation. My original reply is gone. Yeah, thanks for that...
Wit and spin about safety doesn't cover this pedestrian's ungracious obstinance. He's a boor.
The ending, lmao! "See you guys" LOL!
"When the law enforcement officer asks you for an ID you must give it up." Where did the cone up with that lie.
That final response was perfection, that’s how you do it.
When the sgt said, “It’s not a debate.” I was like, ‘nope. The 4th Amendment was debated over 2 centuries ago and I won.
"Youngster"...I freaking love it!! 🤣
He's right. Our rights aren't up for debate.
I was looking for this comment. If it's not for debate then why are you debating on it mf?!😂
@@user-mi3mb8lv2q
Somebody *ELSE* goes down that road and forces our hand MF
They can 100% ask....
I always tell them to say the magic words "I will arrest you if you don't give me id"
Lawsuit.
Made fools out of both Constitutional right violators.
So, let's pretend he was up to something no good. You know the term. This cop made a move and was told to sod off. You applaud. Now he's free to walk in the shady lane as he likes. Now do you know this man. Do you know his demeanor and public standing. Do you know his criminal record or accomplices. Do you know the police officer. NO, of course not. You could now be a victim of this man simply because he has a confrontational attitude. You would be the fool.
@@rascalferret If you want freedom, deal with it.
Free to take a little walk. Weee it's fun to walk in the road after lights out. Gives nothing. A sack of hubris with legs. A 9yr old gives that guff to their nanny when they're pinched and afraid of consequences. So, install mantraps in the lawn just in case this sus walks on it.?...
@@rascalferret key word there, "pretend" like the cops were doing.
@@rascalferretThat's how freedom works. That's how rights work. There is risk, yes. There's also risk (I would argue MORE risk) in giving those in authority unlimited power, which is VERY much what you're arguing.
A police officer doesn't have the right to detain or ask for ID if they sung have reasonable, articulatable cause for suspicion. The 4th amendment implies that and it was explicitly codified in Terry vs Ohio.
Cops following the law is just as important to your safety as everyone else following it.
Police safety my butt, it's called control.
The uncomfortable smile on the Sargeants face said it all. He knew he was wrong & tried to get the free man in his jurisdiction. These tyrants need to go after real criminals & stop violating free people's rights. Thank goodness for recording devices.
They are so full of BS..can't stop lying.
Defund that police department and the police academy that let them graduate. Ask that officer to show you his drivers license and when he refuses, place them under citizens arrest and call 911 to enforce the citizens arrest!!! STOP hiring high school dropouts. There is a second amendment.
Defunding is gonna make it worse lol. They need more funding that way they can be better knowleged of the law and have MORE training to know how to do the job correctly, these cops have had a lack of training due to not enough training resources and therefore are idiots
While I don't agree with the undertrained officers, defunding is not the answer. The funding just needs to be channeled to the right place
@@KutupGypthe solution is #1 stop teaching them that it's us against them. #2 they need to be taught the constitution because they ALL SWEAR to preserve protect and defend the constitution. #3 their unions should be disbanded.#4 NO MORE INVESTIGATING THEMSELVES!
@@KutupGyp the dems want to defund the police these are fake to make you hate them open your eyes.
@TimTommyOmy the first 5 billion wasn't enough give em more please! Goofy.
It’s not a debate. It’s the 4th amendment. It’s disturbing how many cops think they can violate it for any reason. ‘If a cop asks you for ID you must provide it.” No you do not.
Gestapo at its finest.
We must see your papers!
If you don't have a reason to detain then you don't have a reason to ID.
100% correct
Love that the cop was rolling his eyes up like he's looking for the next line of BS to use to charge the guy.
If they don't know their jobs,fire the hell out of em!!! This is dangerous for the public.
Very few do. The standard procedure is send all further up the food chain. If they bring someone in, they let higher ups at the station or the DA worry about the law. I do understand that law libraries can be the size of the Pentagon and they can't know it all, but they don't bother with the meat and potato rights.
We’d have 20 cops across the country if we did that.
@@madtabby66 and the country would be a much safer place
You gave him an out and he wisely took it.
He's right it's not a debate, it's his rights.
They still doing this bullshi...t" Youngsta!!
That "see you guys" was so satisfying 😂
For their safety??? Dude, screw their safety.
Their safety matters but they can't do any of this unless they have RAS of a crime.
@@jarodmorris611 nah, their safety doesn't matter when they act like this. Their safety was never in question at all.
“Not yet, there’s really no…alright have a good night” 😂😂😂
The first cop needs to be fired, the second cop ( a Sergeant ) needs to be demoted for ignorance of the law !
You almost had the young cop crying!!..😂
Cop has no idea what he’s doing. Just making up lies.
Thank God we're at the wrong time of year for acorns to be falling.
NO OBLIGATION to identify unless lawfully arrested, Brown v Texas, 4th and 5th and state law.
AND IF LAWFULLY ARRESTED, the RIGHT to REMAIN SILENT INVOKES.....
NO OBLIGATION to answer questions per:
Watts v. Indiana, 338 U.S. 49 (1949), was a United States Supreme Court case in which Justice Robert Jackson famously opined, "To bring in a lawyer means a real peril to solution of the crime because, under our adversary system, he deems that his sole duty is to protect his client-guilty or innocent-and that, in such a capacity, he owes no duty whatever to help society solve its crime problem. Under this conception of criminal procedure, any lawyer worth his salt will tell the suspect in no uncertain terms to make no statement to police under any circumstances."
In this case, a defendant was subjected to rigorous interrogation methods, including being forced to sleep on the floor, resulting in a confession to having committed murder. The Supreme Court ruled that the confession was involuntary and reversed his conviction.
Terry v Ohio 392 U.S. 1 (1968)
"Of course, the person stopped is not obliged to answer, answers may not be compelled and refusal to answer furnishes no basis for an arrest, although it may alert the officer to the need for continued observation."
“The Supreme Court has repeatedly held that refusal to answer law enforcement questions cannot form the basis of reasonable suspicion. See Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S. Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) ("We have consistently held that a refusal to cooperate, without more, does not furnish the minimal level of objective justification needed for a detention or seizure.") - U.S. v. Santos 403 F.3d 1120 (2005).
Reform and defund them all gr
not real cops dem vidoes
How do you expect to reform them if they are defunded? Use brain lol.
Totally agree they need a reform. Defunding is so beyond stupid tho I honestly can't comprehend how anyone can be so dumb.
I don’t know how or if they can be reformed.
I think police are awful.
But obviously no police doesn’t work either.
You should say "Yes, you can ask me for my ID, but demanding my ID requires RAS of a crime being committed, was committed, or will be committed." They are not wrong saying they can ask, but they are wrong saying you have to provide it when asked. (I know this isn't the original uploader, just a tip for everyone)
I agree with the videos and the laws and I also agree with your statement. Because I don’t have anything to hide. I’ve always provided my ID. I’ve never had any problem. And I’m an Uber driver so late at night I get tired, and I’ll pull over in a parking lot. Very rarely but it’s happened a few times where cops came checked on me asked me a few questions. Ran my drivers license in, told me to get some rest and went on their way.
@@chalonw which is a violation of your right. It's not their job to ID people just because they want to. Just because you have nothing to hide doesn't mean you need to comply with unlawful orders and doesn't mean they won't "find" something to make money off of you. This one dude though he had nothing to hide and let the cops search his vehicle, which had $10,000+ in the trunk with receipts from the bank. They took every penny, but he didn't do anything illegal to acquire that money and had nothing to hide from the police
When the cop said it's not a debate, OP missed the chance to say "your right, it's the constitution and law" 😂
"Am i being detained?" Needs to be the default first question to ask anytime an officer runs up on you.
No, the first thing should be "Am I under arrest?" "Detainment" doesn't require Miranda warnings. "Arrest" does...
No it doesn't, arresting does not require Miranda, stop spreading that tv/movie nonsense. The only time Miranda is required is during interrogation. They can arrest or detain without telling you anything. They aren't even required to explain why in the field for you.
Miranda is required before interrogation. Your charges don't need to be told to you until arraignment. And the "reasonable articulated suspicion" never needs to be explained to you, it's the requirement that they can explain it to a judge to justify the arrest in court.
You may rightfully want to change these things, but that's currently how it works.
You can remind a cop that they need articulate suspicion, but it doesn't mean that they have to disclose it to you. If they back off when you remind them, it's because they realized they wouldn't be able to explain themselves to a judge if they dragged you into arraignment with no valid charge.
Same with Miranda, it's not needed for arrest. They only need to inform you of it if they intend to use what you say in court. If they are arresting you and don't care what you say, they won't read your Miranda rights to you. If you're being officially interrogated, they won't just read them either, you'll sign a form showing the rights to you.
At any point prior, it's just a conversation. If you're not detained or arrested, you can walk away. If you're detained, you can't leave and must provide ID. Even if the officer is wrong, it becomes mandatory that you comply or you escalate to hindering an investigation or resisting arrest. However, you don't need to give them any information beyond your name and ID.
After that, if you feel the detainment or arrest was wrong, you can file your own case for civil rights violations. That's when the cops would need to explain their reasonable articulated suspicion to a judge, not to you. The judge then decides whether your claim has merit and can continue against the cops, or if the cops were right and your case gets dismissed.
There's so much more you're missing...
Just look at this young man's face.. it Dawns on him that there's so much that he doesn't know.... bless his heart
Doesn't have a heart, or a brain.
So glad he stood his ground!!!
Get education like this man!
Know. Know your constructional
Rights!!!
They aren't wrong. They CAN ask, free speech and all that They just can't demand.
They can ask or demand but you don't have to answer with anything other than " I refuse to answer without my lawyer present" don't say any other words!!!😮
In this context, demand has a legal meaning. If an officer gives an order, it's considered a demand and generally you're required to comply. You can contest it in court or file suit for civil rights violations if you think they were wrong, but you shouldn't try to fight a demand in the field. Laws give officers wide discretion when issuing demands.
However, they do have guidelines and laws to follow. Their questions should not rise to being demands until either you're specifically being detained or if they are already engaged in another active incident that you may be interfering with.
So, in this context they can ask anything and you can walk away. If they start issuing demands, you should ask if you're being detained, because if you are, comply, but shut up beyond the basic minimum that is required.
You don't have rights in uniform
This is now the Standing Army that Thomas Jefferson warned us about!
These types of supervisors are the main issue. Either they are dirtier than the cops involved, or they are ignorant of the law.
They just turn up and back up their dirty cops no matter what.
The third possibility is that these types of supervisors are cowards, and too scared to deal with their dirty cops.
100%
Even the supervisor tried to lie until he asked if he was detained
Some of the cops seem to want to argue about RAS, but if you ask "Am I free to go?" they seem to know the right answer for that one.
These tyrants are disgusting!! This happens all of the time, here in Illinois. I believe there are a LOT of these officers that are on a power trip! I am a senior citizen, and respect the law, but not if they're tyrants!!
That officer needs life in prison
br tf is wrng with yu ahahahah
That's insane, fuck off this comment section
So he can waste MORE tax payers money like he wastes oxygen? No.
that "youngster" cut deep lol
Every Police Academy across America needs to add another 30 (full) days of training to address Constitutional Law/Rights and General Public Interaction.
In the EU it takes 3 years to become a police officer not 16 weeks like the US. Highly respect those educated European officers.
If they did that the local government would lose money
@@airborneandrowdy16 weeks? That was decades ago. You pass in 6 now
More like 30 years
Getting a truthful answer out of a cop is like getting one from a woman. Good luck.
I need youre ID walks away. Proceeds to say bye 😂😂😂.....
Abolish qualified immunity, require the same degrees as a lawyer to be in any police force, increase the pay by x10, make any and all cases against police come directly out of their pensions. Problem solved
Just the way he said "see ya guys" did it for me
I love how the officer puts on his body cam after the fact he violated his rights in the beginning
I get nauseous every time I hear anyone in law enforcement say FOR OUR SAFETY.
That "youngster" hurt his soul
"Its not really a debate." Correct because the law is clear.
"For our safety" = we are the biggest cowards on the planet.
The fact that you're being difficult is suspicion enough.
How can there be so many cops that don't know their
FUKN jobs. That's horrible
Can you imagine how many people were wrongfully arrested and possibly convicted by this kind of cops?
For their safety? They came up on him. He was minding his own business and they escalated by harassing him.
Making contact with an individual does not mean that individual must show I’d.
Cops safety is at the bottom of my concern list.
"You were standing in the roadway" 😂 So he's standing in the roadway so he must have weapons on him? 😂😂 Holy shit!
You can't enforce the Law if you don't know it 😔