Paul Davies

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 17

  • @pedrovalente9601
    @pedrovalente9601 3 года назад +13

    It' s always great to watch Paul Davies!

    • @PetraKann
      @PetraKann 2 года назад

      I like to hear what Paul Davies actually says.
      Sometimes I like listening to Paul Davies on the Radio or through my HiFi sound system.
      I prefer to watch Larrisa Livier play the solo on Stairway to Heaven
      😁
      ruclips.net/video/dpSGd1YNSlg/видео.html

  • @voyagersa22
    @voyagersa22 2 года назад +3

    What a great chap. Pleasure to listen to 👻👏🏻

  • @sylviarogier1
    @sylviarogier1 2 года назад +3

    Once I realize that I'm dreaming, I immediately wake up.

  • @2msvalkyrie529
    @2msvalkyrie529 Год назад +1

    Top man . Probably a genius . ? And modest .

  • @robertsterler7091
    @robertsterler7091 Год назад +1

    The problem for Paul Davies is that he is essentially a materialist. He thinks matter comes first. The real mystery of matter is thinking about it. He dances around the thoughts of the universe, but does not seriously address thoughts, consciousness, proceeding existence. It is very easy to say, “existence precedes essence”, but more provocative to say essence proceeds existence. Consciousness comes first is a more logical point of view. He and most other scientists miss the obvious: consciousness does not emerge from the physical realm; the physical realm emerges from consciousness.

  • @eoeo92i2b2bx
    @eoeo92i2b2bx 2 года назад

    I liked the insight into Paul’s brain, as after having physically coughed he used the words “ coughed out of the Big Bang” 😉👍

  • @ALavin-en1kr
    @ALavin-en1kr 8 месяцев назад

    Nothing is said about hyperspace; a dimension behind our universe whose energies affect our dimension.

  • @ALavin-en1kr
    @ALavin-en1kr 8 месяцев назад

    The only thing that is real is the soul which is a spark of the infinite.

  • @Mike-mm4mx
    @Mike-mm4mx Год назад +1

    sounds like he really should have been a philosopher not a scientist

    • @FrancisLukesh
      @FrancisLukesh Год назад

      What’s the difference

    • @Mike-mm4mx
      @Mike-mm4mx Год назад

      @@FrancisLukesh Science actually contains all sorts of philosophical assumptions. I would argue that philosophy is more fundamental than science.

  • @ALavin-en1kr
    @ALavin-en1kr 8 месяцев назад

    There is no such thing as non-life, everything is alive, even the inanimate. It all depends on rate of vibration from the lowest to the highest. Humans have the highest rate.

  • @simonpage6629
    @simonpage6629 2 года назад +2

    Thats a shame, I thought this might be interesting but if he thinks all abduction experiences are drams he obviously hasn’t bothered to look into the subject seriously. People don’t have lucid dreams when they’re awake or driving their cars. Do more research and think logically if you’re an alleged scientist.

    • @TimothyOBrien6
      @TimothyOBrien6 2 года назад

      Yeah, the lucid dream hypothesis can explain some abduction encounters, but there are many cases that defy this explanation as, like you said, they involve encounters in broad daylight, when the person is not dreaming, and can have physical side effects on the subject and/or the environment. Davies is a top physicist, but clearly not well versed in this topic.

  • @aminam9201
    @aminam9201 Год назад

    Paul Davies the thief!
    Planet of the irrational thief apes is planet of endless wonders!