Muslim Epic Response To A Christian - [Shocking Truth] Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) is mentioned in Bible
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 16 окт 2024
- Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @the_perseverance
BECOME A PATRON: www.patreon.co...
Follow Us On TikTok: / theperseverance1
Follow Us On Instagram: www.instagram....
Bringing smile to your face, by REACTING to music that you LOVE.😜
⚠ IMPORTANT DISCLAIMER: IF you don't like any of my uploads for whatever reason, please don't make a scene - contact me here on RUclips by sending me a private message or send me an e-mail on: asmrsuperior@gmail.com & i will happily cooperate and take it down!
© Copyright Notice:
We make these videos to motivate people and inspirate them for better workout. We do not own the clips and music we use in most cases. Our understanding is that it is in correlation to Fair Right Use, however given that it is open to interpretation, if any owners of the content clips would like us to remove the video, we have no problem with that and will do so as fast as possible. Please email us if you have any concerns at laughchallengeme@gmail.com
FAIR-USE COPYRIGHT DISCLAIMER
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
1)This video has no negative impact on the original works (It would actually be positive for them)
2)This video is also for teaching purposes.
3)It is positively transformative in nature.
4)I only used bits and pieces of videos to get the point across where necessary.
Original Video: • [Shocking Truth]- Prop...
Muhammad (pbuh) is prophesised in the book of Isaiah : It is mentioned in the book of Isaiah chapter 29 verse 12 : “And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee : and he saith, I am not learned.” When Archangel Gabrail commanded Muhammad (pbuh) by saying Iqra - “Read”, he replied, “I am not learned”.
Let's read Isaiah 29 in context. First of all, there is no prophet mentioned at all in Isaiah 29. Verse 1: ”Woe to you, Ariel, Ariel, the city where David settled! Add year to year and let your cycle of festivals go on....”
Ariel which means "lion of God" or "lioness of God" and is a name applied to Jerusalem. So NO prophet.
Now read verse 9-13 also in context: “Be delayed and horrified, Blind yourselves and be blind; They become drunk, but not with wine, They stagger, but not with intoxicating drink. For the Lord has poured over you a spirit of deep sleep, He has shut your eyes-the prophets; And He has covered your heads-the seers. The entire vision will be to you like the words of a sealed book, which, when they give it to the one who is literate, saying, “Please read this,” he will say, “I cannot, because it is sealed.” Then the book will be given to the one who is illiterate, saying, “Please read this.” And he will say, “I cannot read.” Then the Lord said, “Because this people approaches Me with their words And honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far away from Me, And their reverence for Me consists of the commandment of men that is taught;”
Well if verse 12 refers to Muhammad then clearly verse 13 refers to his listeners. So if in Isaiah 29:12 Muhammad is mentioned then his listeners, the followers of Islam, removed their hearts far from the Lord and their reverence is human made.
So Isaiah 29:12 is NOT about Muhammad unless the followers of Islam are far from the Lord and their reverence is human made.
There is no and there has never been a Muhammad in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures at all. If there was any then the author of the Quran should quote the verse. But the author of the Quran was not able to quote from the Torah or Gospel at all.
@@reneandjohn this whole video just showed you that its mentioned by name in hebrew language in the original scripture lol, google it right now
@aisexile539 Already long before 'prophet' Google existed, it is already known that Songs of Solomon is written in classic Hebrew. But nowhere in the classic Hebrew language does the name of 'muhamad' exist. Let alone in the bòok Songs of Solomon. The classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים, ma-kha-madim is not a name but it is a masculine plural noun. Just check every high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'muhammad'.
@@reneandjohn It's a name and Hebrew Rabbi who is much more knowledgeable than you has admitted it. But as the Allah tells us in the Qura'n people like you will deny every sign out of hatred and envy.
"How wretched is that for which they sold themselves - that they would disbelieve in what Allah has revealed through [their] outrage that Allah would send down His favor upon whom He wills from among His servants. So they returned having [earned] wrath upon wrath. And for the disbelievers is a humiliating punishment.
"Qura'n 2:90
@mrzidane5799 So you believe the lying uneducated layman Deedat? Deedat has never learned classic Hebrew. Moreover, he was not even officially educated at all. And against all Hebrew scholars, he did tell us about the classic מַחְמַד? Never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar to prove his point. He just fooled his ignorant and gullible audience.
And there is also not one rabbi who says it is a name. But Hebrew scholars apply high valuated Hebrew dictionaries and lexicons for analysing the Tanakh. Like the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English / BDB, HALOT, DCH and Jastrow, etc.
And they are very clear about the Hebrew מַחְמַד:
Noun masculine
Meaning: desire, desirable thing
Pronounce: makh-mawd
So there is no pronunciation of 'muhammad'. And it is clearly a masculine NOUN. So it is NOT a name. So it is IMPOSSIBLE that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
But if I'm wrong then show me just one high valuated Hebrew dictionary or lexicon that clearly says it is a name and pronounced as 'muhammad'. Just one please.
you can read also ..ISIAH 29:12 ...Isaiah 29:12 King James Version 12 And the book is delivered to him that is not learned, saying, Read this, I pray thee: and he saith, I am not learned.....THIS also talking about prophet muhammad peace be upon him.
no it is not its a story not a prophecy
@@mhmmhm1902 i think you don't know your bible cause if you do, you wouldn't have said that is not a prophecy.
Another prophecy in Isaiah 42:11 says; let the wilderness and its towns raise their voices;
Let the settlements where kedar (son of ismael) lives rejoice.
Let the people of sela (madina) sing for joy;
Let them shout from the mountaintops.
But if you have any doubts goggle sela.
First of all, there is no prophet mentioned at all in Isaiah 29. Now let's read Isaiah 29 in context, verse 1: ”Woe to you, Ariel, Ariel, the city where David settled! Add year to year and let your cycle of festivals go on....”
Ariel which means "lion of God" or "lioness of God" and is a name applied to Jerusalem. So NO prophet.
Now read verse 9-13 also in context: “Be delayed and horrified, Blind yourselves and be blind; They become drunk, but not with wine, They stagger, but not with intoxicating drink. For the Lord has poured over you a spirit of deep sleep, He has shut your eyes-the prophets; And He has covered your heads-the seers. The entire vision will be to you like the words of a sealed book, which, when they give it to the one who is literate, saying, “Please read this,” he will say, “I cannot, because it is sealed.” Then the book will be given to the one who is illiterate, saying, “Please read this.” And he will say, “I cannot read.” Then the Lord said, “Because this people approaches Me with their words And honors Me with their lips, But their heart is far away from Me, And their reverence for Me consists of the commandment of men that is taught;”
Well if verse 12 refers to Muhammad then clearly verse 13 refers to his listeners. So if in Isaiah 29:12 Muhammad is mentioned then his listeners, the followers of Islam, removed their hearts far from the Lord and their reverence is human made.
So Isaiah 29:12 is NOT about Muhammad unless the followers of Islam are far from the Lord and their reverence is human made.
@Mod teteh Isaiah 42:10-12 “Sing to the LORD a new song, Sing His praise from the end of the earth! You who go down to the sea, and all that is in it. You islands, and those who dwell on them.
11 Let the wilderness and its cities lift up their voices, The settlements where Kedar inhabits. Let the inhabitants of Sela sing aloud, Let them shout for joy from the tops of the mountains.
12 Let them give glory to the LORD. And declare His praise in the coastlands.
Where in these verses it says a prophet is coming from the end of the earth? Or from the down of the sea? Or from the islands? Or from the wilderness or its cities? Or from the settlements of Kedar? Or from the inhabitants of Sela? Or from the tops of the mountains? Or from the coastlands?
Nowhere it says "a prophet comes from ...", let alone Muhammad.
But it is clear from the context in verses 10-12 that Isaiah was calling all the peoples to praise God for what he has done and will do. After the general introductory statement mentioning "the ends of the earth" Isaiah uses examples of contrast to illustrate this: Those living in the flat coastland near the sea, those living on islands (surrounded by water), and those living in the desert (lacking water), and finally those living on the mountains. All people in all different geographic locations are called to praise the LORD. So these verses have nothing to do with a prophet, let alone Muhammad.
The Christian bro is straggling
there is a difference between a Brother and a Kafir
We muslims believed that the holy spirit is Angel Gibreal pbuh
Yes but Gabriel is just an angel
@@lasadmahmoudi903 how do you mean by just and Angel? He is the only holy spirit we muslims knew and that cannot be God?
@@yusuphajammeh1699I said that just to tell others that Gabriel (PBUH) is an angel. BTW he a mighty angel.
Verses of the Qur'an 61:6. And [mention] when Jesus, the son of Mary, said, "O children of Israel, indeed I am the messenger of Allah to you confirming what came before me of the Torah and bringing good tidings of a messenger to come after me, whose name is Ahmad." But when he came to them with clear evidences, they said, "This is obvious magic."
This is the very first verses that were given to Muhammad in the cave by the Angel Gabriel.
96:1 Read! In the Name of your Lord Who has created ( all that exists).
2. He has created man from a clot ( a piece of thick coagulated blood).
3. Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous.
4. Who has taught ( the writing) by the pen
5. He has taught man that which he knew not.
6. Nay! Verily, man does transgress ( in disbelief and evil deed).
The words of God were put into Muhammad's mouth to say to the people from the Angel Gabriel. Muhammad couldn't speak from his own desires so who did he get his revelation from about Jesus? And who was the Song of Solomon talking about if it wasn't talking about Muhammad?
The Hebrew says Muhammad, but the English does not why would it say Muhammad if it isn't Muhammad?
What Muhammad is it talking about if it is not the Prophet Muhammad?
And who did Paul get his revelation from?
And the four Gospels were written anonymously so where did they get their information from that Jesus was talking about the Holy Spirit? Where did the authors of the four Gospels get the information from? Your Christian Scholars say that the Four Gospels were written anonymously but we have Pastors telling Christians Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John actually wrote the Gospels but that's not true.
The classic Hebrew does not speak about Muhammad. The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
@vdPlas And I guess the Jew who was in this video who doesn't even know Deedat lied as well right?
And those Jews reciting in Hebrew saying Muhammadim clear as day was making believe they were saying Muhammadim to right? I heard no kha. I heard many Jews who are honest say that Muhammad's name is mentioned and no those Jews who were honest aren't Muslim, but I guess they are lying to right?
Problem for islamic apologists is that never did Jesus Christ say that a prophet will come after Him. Moreover it is impossible that Jesus Christ could ever say such a statement. Because Jesus Christ is the Truth, the Life and the only way to the Father. So after Him no prophets are needed anymore. So Muhammad was no prophet at all. That's also why Jesus Christ never said that a prophet will come after Him.
@juannifer32 Do you mean that guy disguised himself as a rabbi? That guy 'rabbi' Mort is exposed as a deceiver, he is no rabbi. He is pretending to be a rabbi but he is no. Real Jews and rabbis like rabbi Elhanan Miller has shown he is no rabbi. Quotation by rabbi Elhanan Miller:
“No Jew would believe this guy as a Jew or rabbi.”. And Arabic native speaking people has discovered ‘rabbi’ Mort as an Iranian speaking Muslim.
And mr Mort also don't know Hebrew. 'Rabbi' Mort claimed that 'muhammadin' is found in Songs of Solomon. But again he is wong, מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is pronounced as ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other deception made by 'rabbi' Mort is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is an masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it cannot refer to Muhammad.
@juannifer32 And Jews pronounce מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as 'ma-kha-madim' and not as 'muhammadim'. Nevertheless the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is not a name but a masculine plural noun. And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
ALLAHumma barik for the Bro, amin!
I think if the Christian bro honest in faith...he should consider reading the original scripture in Hebrew
Over right world
Sure then you consider that nowhere in the Jewish and Christian Scriptures is Muhammad mentioned.
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
@@reneandjohn if your claim was true why they translate to be all together lovely? If they don't want the name Muhammad PBUH to be mentioned why not just translated to "praise one"
@Hu fun For analysing the Tanakh, scholars in classic Hebrew apply high valuated Hebrew dictionaries and lexicons. Like the Brown Driver Briggs Hebrew and English / BDB, HALOT, DCH and Jastrow, etc.
And they are very clear about the Hebrew מַחְמַד:
Noun masculine
Meaning: desire, desirable thing
Pronounce: makh-mawd
So, there is no pronunciation of 'Muhammad'. And it is clearly a masculine noun. So it is not a name. So it is impossible that it refers to the name of 'Muhammad'.
Deedat was no scholar in classic Hebrew. Moreover, he was not even officially educated at all. And never did Deedat refer to a Hebrew dictionary or scholar to prove his point. Deedat just fooled his ignorant audience.
@@reneandjohn Then this verse what Jesus referring to who
16:5-11 - ".... but now the time has come for me to go away to the one who sent me. None of you asks me, 'Where are you going?' That is because you are so distressed at what I have told you. Yet I am telling you the simple truth when I assure you that it is a good thing for you that I should go away. For if I did not go away, the divine helper would not come to you. But if I go, then I will send him to you. When he comes, he will convince the world of the meaning of sin, of true goodness and of judgment. He will expose their sin because they do not believe in me; he will reveal true goodness for I am going away to the Father and you will see me no longer; and he will show them the meaning of judgment, for the spirit which rules this world will have been judged.
16:12-15 - "I have much more to tell you but you cannot bear it now. Yet when that one I have spoken to you about comes - the Spirit of truth - he will guide you into everything that is true. For he will not be speaking of his own accord but exactly as he hears, and he will inform you about what is to come. He will bring glory to me for he will draw on my truth and reveal it to you. Whatever the Father possesses is also mine; that is why I tell you that he will draw on my truth and will show it to you.
You should talk about why its written Muhammad-im, "im" means "a lot of respect of" so it was talking about someone that whom to be respected. The whole Song of Solomon Chapter 5 is describing about someone. "HE" is a man. Muhammad that we respect a lot.
Manshaa allah
Even if you think the verse says nothing about the prophet Muhammad, the word "Muhammad" is still present in the original Hebrew text. Does the word "Muhammad" come from hebrew?
No, there is no 'muhammad' in the classic Hebrew. The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
@@reneandjohn Makhamadim looks and sounds the same to me, because the "ha" used in the name Muhammad reads/sounds "kha" in Arabic. and the presence of "Im" (masculine plural of respect) indicates that it is an important and honorable name.
That's my opinion, and it doesn't matter to me whether you believe it or not. I still lack knowledge about the Bible, I don't want to argue with hard-hearted people (not open-minded), who think they are the smartest in the world and then reply to every comment in the comments column.
@Blue Sky The 'ma' in מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים does not sound like the 'mu' of 'muhammad' at all. The 'ma' has a clear 'a' like in the English 'after' and is totally different from the 'u'. Furthermore, all Muslims pronounce the soft 'ha' in 'Muhammad' and not the hard 'kha' in the Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים. But after all, differences and simularities between these words are irrelevant. Because the classic Hebrew מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is not a name but a masculine plural noun. So it is impossible that it refers to the name of a person, let alone Muhammad. So every islamic apologist that assumes מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as a name is lying.
@Blue Sky Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
@@reneandjohn In Arabic there are two types of the letter "H", one soft "H" which is "ها" and one hard "H" which is "ح". In the name Muhammad uses the letter "H" hard "ح".
The name Muhammad consists of the letters "ahmd", such as Muhammad or Ahmad or Mahammad.
whatever your preconceptions and however you try to avoid, the word that sounds like "Mahammad" is there. it makes sense with Islamic teachings, that every messenger preaches about Muhammad.
If you hate Muhammad, it is only natural that you will find every way to reject him, even refute your own Bible. it doesn't matter to me whether you believe it or not. if you keep trying hard to refuse it, keep spirit bro 💪
How can man be so blind...
How can you believe that another man / human being can die for your sins ? This is not logical at all. You believe this so that you can continue doing all the evil and mischief.
If someone rapes your mother or your sister, his sins are forgiven in your "religion" due to a man dying for his sins in the past. Would you forgive that person ? most likely you would not and you would prosecute him to the core.
Christianity = Contradiction.
Isaiah 53:3-5 literally predicts that the messiah will die for our sins smh repent
@@mhmmhm1902 repent before it's too late and stop leading people astray but i don't blame you guys because your eyes are open seen nothing and your hearts are blind may almighty Allah guide you guys to the light of Islam
SubhanALLAH
To add up jesus spoke when he was a baby written in the Quran but not in the bible
This christian brother is in denial🤔🙄🙂. He keeps asking "is this in the Quran" lol.
What is speaking in tongues mean? How can this heal someone? My friend open your mind to the truth.
My suggestion to cristians brother and sister is .listen God is so mercyfull you belive in 1 God
Do riset ask learned men from any religion and chouse with you mind and heart .and do good deeds
The brother just wants to believe his own understanding with a blind heart..its not easy to accept what you've been brainwashed with. Hope Allah guides you to the truth.
My dear devine...May Allah quite you to straight path... You know Ahmed deedat what he is saying is the clear truth.... Because is a prove that no one can said this is not a good prove... Plzzzzzzzzzzz do more research inshallah one day you will know what Islam truly is....
Brother if you can explain how Jesus who you believe is God prayed to God
And when he prayed to God he didn't pray to the father and the holy spirit
In the lord's prayer in your Bible you are taught by Jesus himself that you only have the father as your God
Where is the trinity in the lord's prayer????
Why dld the church change it then?
Why this christian guy keep saying spirit..Look if U believe in God..in surah Yasin the verb said Kun Fun Ya kun..it mean if Allah said happen it will happen.
Mention of Mohammed in a Christian Bible. This is a lie to corrupt. We worship two different gods we are two different faiths.
So brother with all due respect Adam and Eve is then a bigger miracle if Jesus having a mother and no father is a great miracle so great that he has to be God
Adam was created by God directly not inside the womb of a mother Eve was created from Adam Explain to us how is that not a bigger miracle than that of Jesus
Although in Islam we are not taught to rate in this way but for the sake of clarity in this particular case I'd say your argument is flawed beyond reproach
even this muslim brother has very little knowledge and cant explain well, please add me if you have any questions i can explain everything clearly with evidence, its painful to see him not even sure of what he is saying or explaining about mary
You have ecceeded limits by saying Mohamed in bible.
Out of your mind mohamed is not of ishmael lineage and even if dohe is so not in the covenant given to abraham and his seed continued in isaac and jacob that in his seed the world will be blessed.
Isaiah is not mentioned in Quran.
Specifying it says in the torah and gospel.
You guys are crazy
Song of solomon
Isaiah
Habakuk
Are not mentiomed by Allah
Not in torah or gospel
Why go there?
Desperate?
Misled?
I thinkso.
No mohamed in these
Bro React on is Jesus pbuh God Ahmed deedat pastor standli
Is Muhammad predicted in Songs of Solomon 5:16?
חִכֹּו֙ מַֽמְתַקִּ֔ים וְכֻלֹּ֖ו מַחֲמַדִּ֑ים זֶ֤ה דֹודִי֙ וְזֶ֣ה רֵעִ֔י בְּנֹ֖ות יְרוּשָׁלִָֽם׃
ḥikwō maməṯaqqîm wəḵullwō maḥămadîm zeh ḏwōḏî wəzeh rē‘î bənwōṯ yərûšālāim:
“His mouth is most sweet; he is altogether lovely. This is my beloved, and this is my friend, O daughters of Jerusalem.”
The first mistake by Deedat is that he pronounced מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים as ‘muhamaddim’. But he is wrong, it is ‘ma-kha-madim’. So there is no pronunciation of Muhammad.
The other mistake made by Deedat is that he said that ‘מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים' is a name. Again he is very wrong because מַחֲּמַדִּ֑ים is a masculine plural noun, so it is not a name (like יְהוִֹה, Yhvh). And because it is not a name it is impossible that it refers to the name of ‘Muhammad’.
Also the claim that the plural 'im' (or 'eem') in ma-kha-madim in the Hebrew language was ‘added for respect’ is in this case false. First of all, nowhere in Songs of Solomon 5 it speaks about אֱלהִים, elohim, the masculine noun for a godhead. But Song of Solomon 5 speaks about ממתקים, mamtaqim and מחמדים, ma-kha-madim. So you can't compare apples with oranges. Biblical poetry is typically built on pairs of metaphors, for example "they were swifter than eagles, they were stronger than lions". In Song of Songs 5:16 it's "His mouth is most sweet, ממתקים, he is altogether lovely, מחמדים. So מחמדים, ma-kha-madim is equivalent to ממתקים, mamtaqim. So the addition ‘-im’ is just a superlative of ‘desire', so it means 'most desire'. Exactly in line with the other words in vers 16: ‘mamtaqim’ = most sweet and other places ‘partamim' = most noble.
Forms of the same Hebrew word are also used elsewhere in the Old Testament, yet Islamic ‘scholars' do not claim that those passages refer to Muhammad. Rightly so, since those verses cannot be forced to fit the notion that Muhammad is under consideration. For example, Isaiah 64:11 mourns the destruction of Jerusalem: “Our holy and beautiful temple, where our fathers praised You, is burned up with fire; and all our pleasant things are laid waste.” “Pleasant things” is a form of the same word in Song of Solomon 5:16. Would Deedat contend that Muhammad was “laid waste” in Jerusalem?
sure im ready to believe deedat was wrong, but what about the jewish man who recorded the video saying mohammed is there? lol also the other recittations of jewish people pronouncing it mohammed?
@aisexile539 Jewish man? That guy 'rabbi' Mort is exposed as a deceiver. He is no rabbi. He is pretending to be a rabbi but he is not.
@aisexile539 Real Jews and rabbis like rabbi Elhanan Miller have shown he is no rabbi. Quotation by rabbi Elhanan Miller:
“No Jew would believe this guy as a Jew or rabbi.”.
@aisexile539 Also did the Jewish graduate David Lange expose ‘rabbi’ Mort as a fraud.
@@aisexile539 And Arabic native speaking people have discovered ‘rabbi’ Mort as an Iranian speaking Muslim. So said that islamic apologists disguise themselves to f00l their own people.