Respect... Perfect analysis and objective description... It's sad that no official political analyst or war expert has thought as much ... You also mentioned that arab nations know what Israel is up to ... Typical ... And I am sure thee world now knows...
Your doing an amazing job. The peaceful struggle for the life, truth, and humanity is the greatest deed. Bless you, may you be empowered in your work, and provided well during your journey. May all your goals be achieved, may we have a beautiful world where we make no suffering for our fellows.
This should be included on the hearing - On the 7th, there were no direct attacks on civilians, only collateral damage. Out of the 769 names on the Haaretz dataset, 462 were military personnel, including 55 soldiers, 13 privates, 59 corporals, 200 sergeants (45 of whom were sergeant majors), 48 commanders, 32 lieutenants, 5 lieutenant colonels, 6 colonels, 37 officers, 10 inspectors, 6 intendents, and 2 Lance Corp. This was a military defeat, and they are taking it out on the rest. On the 7th, it is crucial to understand that there were no direct attacks on civilians, only collateral damage. Out of the 1148 total names, 403 were military personnel, 59 belonged to the police, and 668 were civilians. The collateral damage on the 7th was significantly lower than any of the ITf "mowing" operations, which had a ratio of 6:1. When including all casualties, not just deaths, the collateral damage ratio of the "mowing" operations is a staggering 162:1. On the 7th, with 462 military personnel out of 1148 total, the ratio of civilians to military personnel was a mere 1.6:1, which is a hundred times lower than the 162:1 ratio of the "mowing" operations based on analyzing UN OHC data from 2008 to 2022. The reported ages of the victims are as follows: 0-4: 2 civilians 5-12: 8 civilians 13-17: 14 civilians 18-25: 132 civilians 26-40: 119 civilians 41-60: 55 civilians 61+: 40 civilians Active duty military personnel: 18-25: 258 active duty military personnel 26-40: 60 active duty military personnel 41-60: 17 active duty military personnel 61+: 1 active duty military personnel -Yocheved Lifshitz account - 'they treated us well' -Yasmin Porat account - 'i.T.f kxilled my husband' civilians were taken to have swaps for the civilians rotting in prisons without charge on the other side. An excess of ten thousands, all before the seventh.
That is a great factual assessment of the breakdown of casualties. Yes there are a lot of facts hidden in the numbers and. as I always say, Numbers don't lie. Really appreciate you. adding to the knowledge here.
haaretz datasheet titled title: xsraxl's Dead: The Names of Those Killed in Hxmxs Attacks, Mxssxcres and the xsrxel-Hxmxs Wxr There is a more detailed report of of oct 7th titled "I scrapped the information about 1096 of the 1460 killed on 7th of October Attack. Children Less than 1%" Wrote it 2 months ago hence numerical discrepancy as it was reported to had been 1500 back then and not just 1148 as it is now.
Hamas deliberately targeted civilians. They filmed themselves murdering civilians in the most horrific ways possible and uploaded the video to the victims' Facebook profiles, so all their relatives could see. I don't understand your argument. Are you saying that out of 1,200 dead people, 80% were killed by Hamas, and 20% by Israeli friendly fire? Whether it's 50-50%, what difference does it make? Hamas's stated goal in the attack was to kill and kidnap as many Israelis as possible (soldiers are preferred, but they also murdered and kidnapped 1-year-old babies and 90-year-old grandmothers). You are basically trying to defend Nazis. For God's sake, they also murdered Israeli Arab Muslims! If you had been present that day in the villages targeted by Hamas, you would have been killed too @The Kandari Chronicles
You can argue that Israel's response to the murder of 1,000 civilians, killing 20 times more Palestinians, was disproportionate. That might be a valid argument. However, claiming that Hamas didn't intentionally inflict the most Al-Qaeda-like terror attack in history is essentially spreading fake news. Please don't try to counter with 'what about-ism'.
Not at all. The video is about how truth is insignificant when one wants to justify one’s present or future actions. Using fake stories to maximise sympathy from the world is both dangerous and immoral especially when you yourself have in all likelihood caused a substantial part of that damage and suffering as the IDF did. Blaming everyone but yourself and always positioning yourself as the victim has run its course. And regarding your use of the term Nazis for Hamas, then what would be a term for the Israeli government, the ones who openly state they want to wipe out all of Gaza of Palestinians? How would you justify their actions? The chosen people?
@@thekandarichronicles Thank you for your reply. Israel is a democratic Western state, and its stated goal is not to kill people, even if some low-ranking parliament members suggest otherwise. Proof: if Israel wanted to eliminate all Gazans, it certainly could (through nuclear weapons, starvation, or direct attacks), which, of course, it doesn't do. Conversely, Hamas's stated goal, as presented on October 7, is to kill as many Israelis as possible, including Israeli Arabs on the same day. Thus, in terms of intent, Hamas can be likened to Nazis, whereas Israel can be compared to a country at war, unintentionally causing civilian casualties while fighting Nazis who use civilians as shields. Its very similar to WWII, where many German civilians died, but no war crimes were charged against Britain or America. I realy appricate your answer BTW
The tracked civilian casualty rate even BEFORE 7th October is 96%-4% killed by Israel-Hamas. Everyone educating themselves on this matter knows who Nazis are in this conflict. And why are Zionists in Palestine? To take over other peoples in search of Lebensraum, right?
Respect... Perfect analysis and objective description... It's sad that no official political analyst or war expert has thought as much ... You also mentioned that arab nations know what Israel is up to ... Typical ... And I am sure thee world now knows...
Congratulations on the research
Asslamalikum. Most accurate explanation I’ve heard so far, good job brother.
Thank you Amin. Really appreciate your great words and valuable support.
I'm sharing this channel in my telegram pages
Greatly appreciated Azizullah. Very generous of you. I really hope you enjoyed it and would love to hear more about your thoughts. 🙏🏼
@tareqkandari7277 I will contact you soon. If you want someone to brainstorm ideas, it would be a pleasure to help you grow this channel.
Always looking inspiration. And thank you for offering your tremendous support!
@shalomshalom8715 That’s a perfect bit of info that compliments the discussion here.
Excellent reporting
Thank you. I am glad you enjoyed.
Your doing an amazing job. The peaceful struggle for the life, truth, and humanity is the greatest deed. Bless you, may you be empowered in your work, and provided well during your journey. May all your goals be achieved, may we have a beautiful world where we make no suffering for our fellows.
Than you Christopher and I appreciate your kind words. We all pray for the stoppage of any suffering and injustice.
This should be included on the hearing - On the 7th, there were no direct attacks on civilians, only collateral damage. Out of the 769 names on the Haaretz dataset, 462 were military personnel, including 55 soldiers, 13 privates, 59 corporals, 200 sergeants (45 of whom were sergeant majors), 48 commanders, 32 lieutenants, 5 lieutenant colonels, 6 colonels, 37 officers, 10 inspectors, 6 intendents, and 2 Lance Corp. This was a military defeat, and they are taking it out on the rest.
On the 7th, it is crucial to understand that there were no direct attacks on civilians, only collateral damage. Out of the 1148 total names, 403 were military personnel, 59 belonged to the police, and 668 were civilians. The collateral damage on the 7th was significantly lower than any of the ITf "mowing" operations, which had a ratio of 6:1. When including all casualties, not just deaths, the collateral damage ratio of the "mowing" operations is a staggering 162:1. On the 7th, with 462 military personnel out of 1148 total, the ratio of civilians to military personnel was a mere 1.6:1, which is a hundred times lower than the 162:1 ratio of the "mowing" operations based on analyzing UN OHC data from 2008 to 2022.
The reported ages of the victims are as follows:
0-4: 2 civilians
5-12: 8 civilians
13-17: 14 civilians
18-25: 132 civilians
26-40: 119 civilians
41-60: 55 civilians
61+: 40 civilians
Active duty military personnel:
18-25: 258 active duty military personnel
26-40: 60 active duty military personnel
41-60: 17 active duty military personnel
61+: 1 active duty military personnel
-Yocheved Lifshitz account - 'they treated us well'
-Yasmin Porat account - 'i.T.f kxilled my husband'
civilians were taken to have swaps for the civilians rotting in prisons without charge on the other side. An excess of ten thousands, all before the seventh.
That is a great factual assessment of the breakdown of casualties. Yes there are a lot of facts hidden in the numbers and. as I always say, Numbers don't lie. Really appreciate you. adding to the knowledge here.
haaretz datasheet titled title: xsraxl's Dead: The Names of Those Killed in Hxmxs Attacks, Mxssxcres and the xsrxel-Hxmxs Wxr
There is a more detailed report of of oct 7th titled "I scrapped the information about 1096 of the 1460 killed on 7th of October Attack. Children Less than 1%"
Wrote it 2 months ago hence numerical discrepancy as it was reported to had been 1500 back then and not just 1148 as it is now.
That's just a lie...
@@artair70 You're just a Hasbara troll.
@@Peace_Guard A what?
Thank you.
Love the cover. It speaks volumes.
Thank you. Don't think that many people noticed. You've got sharp eyes.
@tareqkandari7277 that was smooth, my friend. I give you that 👌
RUclips is my only social media so to further tjhis video i've liked most all posts below, to boost you on the algorithm. much love & truth for peace.
Thank you so much Brenda and i appreciate your wonderful support.
Amazing
Thank you Louis I appreciate your time to watch this content. Unfortunately and to my surprise it underperformed.
Bro they own it all
❤🇵🇸❤🇵🇸❤🇵🇸❤
Thank and yes 🇵🇸❤️
We still have the 40 babies doing the rounds
That's nothing. The rounds still include that there were no Palestinians period.
Hamas deliberately targeted civilians. They filmed themselves murdering civilians in the most horrific ways possible and uploaded the video to the victims' Facebook profiles, so all their relatives could see. I don't understand your argument. Are you saying that out of 1,200 dead people, 80% were killed by Hamas, and 20% by Israeli friendly fire? Whether it's 50-50%, what difference does it make? Hamas's stated goal in the attack was to kill and kidnap as many Israelis as possible (soldiers are preferred, but they also murdered and kidnapped 1-year-old babies and 90-year-old grandmothers). You are basically trying to defend Nazis. For God's sake, they also murdered Israeli Arab Muslims! If you had been present that day in the villages targeted by Hamas, you would have been killed too @The Kandari Chronicles
You can argue that Israel's response to the murder of 1,000 civilians, killing 20 times more Palestinians, was disproportionate. That might be a valid argument. However, claiming that Hamas didn't intentionally inflict the most Al-Qaeda-like terror attack in history is essentially spreading fake news. Please don't try to counter with 'what about-ism'.
Not at all. The video is about how truth is insignificant when one wants to justify one’s present or future actions. Using fake stories to maximise sympathy from the world is both dangerous and immoral especially when you yourself have in all likelihood caused a substantial part of that damage and suffering as the IDF did. Blaming everyone but yourself and always positioning yourself as the victim has run its course.
And regarding your use of the term Nazis for Hamas, then what would be a term for the Israeli government, the ones who openly state they want to wipe out all of Gaza of Palestinians? How would you justify their actions? The chosen people?
@@thekandarichronicles Thank you for your reply. Israel is a democratic Western state, and its stated goal is not to kill people, even if some low-ranking parliament members suggest otherwise. Proof: if Israel wanted to eliminate all Gazans, it certainly could (through nuclear weapons, starvation, or direct attacks), which, of course, it doesn't do. Conversely, Hamas's stated goal, as presented on October 7, is to kill as many Israelis as possible, including Israeli Arabs on the same day. Thus, in terms of intent, Hamas can be likened to Nazis, whereas Israel can be compared to a country at war, unintentionally causing civilian casualties while fighting Nazis who use civilians as shields. Its very similar to WWII, where many German civilians died, but no war crimes were charged against Britain or America. I realy appricate your answer BTW
Hasbara detected opinion immediately rejected
The tracked civilian casualty rate even BEFORE 7th October is 96%-4% killed by Israel-Hamas. Everyone educating themselves on this matter knows who Nazis are in this conflict.
And why are Zionists in Palestine? To take over other peoples in search of Lebensraum, right?
Thanks for the graph 📉