@CanvasCountryBalls, I like your video, but there a couple details you missed: 1. The Flag of the British Empire was just England and Scotland. 2. You missed the Patriot Revolution, which is not minor at all! And 3. The Spanish controlled Oregon Territory before the British and Americans.
The French allied with every single First Nation they met along the Saint Lawrence river, with the exception of the Iroquois. They sheltered the Huron (Wendat) who were being crushed by the Iroquois. And they finally made peace with the Iroquois in 1701 (Paix des Braves, peace of the braves).
@@MrKingsley The thing is the French did not steal any land. According to the Second Calumet Treaty by the Natives and Jacques Cartier, the French were given full authority over the Saint Laurent bassin, and could settle anywhere they pleased. Furthermore, not one french settlement was built on native land, and not one massacre outside wartime and against an openly hostile tribe ( I say tribe and not tribes because there was only one, the Iroquois of Lake Champlain, who literally led the Huron Genocide). The French did not loot, or rape, or kill. Whom would they? All the natives were their close allies, bar best friends. The French burried natives in European cemetaries, unlike any other european power in America, the French intermarried with natives without forced marriages unlike any european power, the French never did anything on any tribal land without said tribe's aproval first. In fact, the natives loved the French so much that when New France collapsed under British invasion, said Natives led a near decenial-long revolt led by a native for the return of the French, when the French did nothing. If you can name a single inch of land that was stolen by the New French Colonial Administration, I will cede my argument.
@@MrKingsley Nah, France was way nicer to first nations around Quebec since there was no choice and they also mixed with them much more since there were so few French women(that's how the Metis people ended-up existing), so they had a lot more of them as allies. There is a reason why it's called the French and Indian war in English, because they were fighting French and Indian, not because the two were fighting each other, in French it's called the war of the conquest. The French had like 10x more First Nations allies. At the time of that war there was 60000 French compared to 2 millions British in the colonies. This is why the French had to be nice to the First Nations, they did not have the numbers to fight with the British without the native population and didn't have the number to fight with natives either. Most of the massacres happening in New France was between the First Nations who always fought each other with the Iroquois getting guns first and massacring other First Nations before the French started arming their allies with guns and they got revenge. Colonization was bad, but the Iroquois were also colonizing at the time with them expanding and taking other First Nations territories and New France only started being a true colony in 1673 by sending women to get the population growing, before that it was more of a trading post, that's why the population was so much lower than the British colonies. The 1701 treaty with the first nations is still recognized officially in Quebec. The other guy is also wrong about its name, it's not the peace of the brave which is a recent treaty from 2002 between the province of Quebec and the Cree nations about economical and land development. The 1701 treaty is called the Great Peace of Montreal and made peace between New France and 39 First Nations, which was basically all the First Nations around the place and is also still recognized by the signatory First Nations. New France was definitely a one of a kind colonization event in many aspects in how it developed more peacefully. After New France was given to the British in 1763 it was also the first time the British gave rights to Catholics and imposed little on the French living there by allowing them to keep most of their laws, language and religion, something the Irish would have very much wanted, and yet again it was for the practical reason they didn't want Quebec allying with the US. Ohio was also given by the Crown to Quebec at the time before the US declared independence because the French didn't try to push and exterminate the First Nations so them being a part of Quebec's territory protected the first nations living there since the Brits couldn't settle there legally anymore with the laws in the territory of Quebec being different. That is even referenced in the US declaration of independence as some of the causes. Even today the First Nations in Quebec are doing much better than the First Nations in the rest of Canada.
@@ArmeniaMiko I agree but this relationship had changed a lot in 19 century. Until the sixties , natives were second class people in their own land. The things goes better now but it's far from friendship between French people and Amerindians even out of Québec.
@@ArmeniaMikoyeah sorry to burst your bubble but quebec religious groups still destroyed families by kidnapping kids to "educate" them aka forcing a religion and language on them Police kidnapping native women to rape them and then abandon them in the middle of the woods is also a scarily common occurence that has not stopped If you absolutely wanna compare us yeah our crimes are nothing like the english and spanish, but thats not because we were saint, we were dying in these frozen lands and needed help from the guys living here and we still did bad things to them, if canada wasnt a frozen wasteland, no doubts the natives wouldnt have been treated better than french teeated their african slave in haiti
THAT is a complete lie THE NATIVES WHERE KILLED AND FORCE TO READ THE BIBLE AND LOST THERE LAND AND BECAME USED TO WHITE INBREEDS IN THERE LAND AND EVENTUALLY BECAME MINORITIES!!!!!!! BULSHIT!!!
a lot of the dates where way off: 1- Dominion of Canada is 1867 2- Creation of "Canada" is 1931 after the Statute of Westminster ... in 1965, the flag just changed 3- you could have put the entry of Manitoba (1870), BC (1871), PEI (1873), alberta and Saskatchewan (1905) etc. 4- the british got on the east coast with the the Plymouth colonie way before you put the conquest of new york 5- etc etc Still cool video
Depending on how you define “creation” of Canada you are also wrong. Most historians agree Canada began when the name came into common use in the 1790s. The first governors of Upper Canada and Lower Canada being cited as when Canada began its existence, or creation. Your definition of creation is very much in the minority, and the first I have ever heard it in my 2 decades of being a history nerd. You’re very much alone in this when the academic community would disagree with you. You might want to ensure you are accurate in your corrections of other people’s work.
@@MrKingsley your understanding of Canadian history is really bent. The Canadas (Upper and Lower) were created in the 1790s. They even had Governors to “govern” them. In fact the first Governor of “Upper Canada” (now Ontario) was Sir John Graves Simcoe, countless things and places in Ontario are named after him, and he was promenade battalion commander during the US War of Independence. Not too long into the future there was Major General Sir Isaac Brock, a hero of the War of 1812, who also served as Governor of Upper Canada. The former even wrote an executive order to outlaw slavery in Upper Canada in the 1790s. If Canada didn’t exist why were so many governmental decisions made by a “Governor” of a place called “Upper Canada”???🤔 Then in 1841 Upper and Lower Canada united to form the “United Province of Canada”… or more simply referred to as “Canada”. At this point, in 1841, Canada was granted independent responsible self-government. It was this government Sir John A. McDonald later lead in the 1860s through the Confederation Conferences BEFORE 1867. How can a Canadian government exist before 1867 if Canada didn’t exist yet, according to you? All that happened in 1867 was that Canada Confederated with 2 other colonies, formed a federal government, slit Canada into 2 provinces while adding the other 2 colonies as provinces, all under a Constitution called the British North American Act (1867). Oh and a new capital for Canada was selected by the Queen. “New” capital, there had already been 4 capitals of Canada before Ottawa was made the new capital. These are all common knowledge facts about Canada’s history, things not in dispute, and they collectively prove you very wrong. Educate yourself before trying to correct someone who isn’t even slightly wrong!
Including the Quebec failed Referendum on the map but missing the whole Newfoundland- Labrador- Quebec border problems; Reminding me there was a Real (lol joke in there) rebellion in Manitoba…
@@MrKingsley lol… your understanding of this is really superficial. Your conclusions defy a mountain of facts that completely disprove your conclusions and your supporting argument completely circumvents the meaning of the word “nation” and how Canada formed its national identity. You are using the word in the context of what is actually called “sovereignty”. If you make the argument Canada was not created until “sovereignty” was established, you at least have a point, one I disagree with, and most historians disagree but it would be at least a logic based, if very bias and narrow-minded, conclusion. We could part to agree to disagree. However, when you base your biased, very superficial, conclusion on a completely inaccurate understanding of the word “nation” and how Canada formed its national identity, then you are just making yourself look very poorly educated. Your argument is not logical when you tie nationalism to sovereignty, they are 2 COMPLETELY different things. Allow me to educate you. “Nationalism” is a liberal ideology that rose out of Europe in the 1830s & 40s. The first country in North America to begin adopting this liberal ideology was the USA in the wake of the Civil War. The war itself was fought over the argument of how much federal control the country would hold over the states, and the post-war was about how to build a national identity from coast to coast, starting with the Reconstruction program. In Europe, over the pervious decades just before the US Civil War, they had several revolutions to reform many countries into nation-states. Forming the first national governments, before then all government forms were of the sovereign-state verity (to oversimplify a lot). What this means is before the mid 1800s practically all sovereign countries were NOT nations, they had no nation-state ideology or political system. So the British Empire, French Empire, Prussia, Russian Empire, Spanish Empire, even the USA, all were NOT nations… yet! This also means the modern term “First Nations” to describe aboriginal people is a huge misnomer, it’s a factually incorrect way to describe bands of tribal peoples. They never formed a political system that would meet the definition of a nation until long after white people established their own nations first. This does not mean nations did not exist before the mid 1800s, the movement to form nations-states came from all existence of national identities. But the first sovereign-states to evolve into nation-states didn’t happen until the days of the United Province of Canada. Therefore, the first true “nation”, in what is now called Canada, was the Quebec nation. Which slowly formed following their defend in the Seven Years War. This is why it is called a “confederation”. Different colonies, with their own national identities, joined together under a semi-sovereign independent federal government. That means in 1867 Canada was not yet one nation. We had no national identity tied to the semi-sovereign federal political system. “Semi-sovereign” to mean a completely independent federal government, but any state level matters dealing directly with Canada’s sovereignty were still handled by the UK. This did not change until the Statue of Westminster was adopted in 1932. The only thing that changed in 1982 was the highly problematic Charter of Rights and Freedoms was added to the Constitution, the BNA Act (1867) was renamed, and the Constitution was repatriated. Canada is to this very day still technically a Dominion of the British Crown. The Monarchy is still the head-of-state in Canada, making us a Dominion. We just stopped referring to ourselves as a Dominion because the Pierre Trudeau government was very anti-monarchy and wanted to further grow Canada’s nationalism as being separate from the British, as opposed to the decades prior where our national identity was seen as linked to our mother country. As for the issue of when Canada actually became a nation, and when we formally became a nation-state, well the latter is easy to answer. That was clearly established in 1932: the Statute of Westminster. But for defining when Canada actually became a nation, that’s a much more subjective question. Honestly, I do not hold a specific day or year when that could be said to have happened, because just like in the USA, it was a very gradual process of evolving from colonies to a federation, then to nation-state via a national identity. But what I will say for certain is that before the Great War we had no national identity. Our troops went into the War as good loyal subjects of the British Empire, realizing they had a very distinct difference to the British in the UK, and they did not appreciate being linked to their officer corps that could not identify with them as Canadians. This attitude, developed on the battlefields of Europe, did not exist in Canada itself until our veterans brought it home with them in 1919. All this is why your argument holds no water. You ignorantly think nation meant sovereignty in the 1860s, and Canada as a nation is a very modern concept. Only around 100 years old. But gaining full sovereignty from the British has never actually happened, because we are still a Dominion, but a completely self-governing dominion with complete control over issues of sovereignty: the latter in 1932, the former in 1841… NOT 1867! Cheers
@@James-zg2nl What MrKingsley said was correct, the country of Canada was established on July 1st, 1867, however, Canada as we know it today came about much later. The British North America Act established the Dominion of Canada which was self-governing and could elect its leaders. It was in 1867 when the Canadian federal government came into existence and began controlling Canada’s domestic affairs. For this reason, many Canadians consider 1867 as the year when Canada gained its independence. Of course, there still wasn’t a Canadian identity in Canada as many groups still identified themselves as either English, French, First Nation, etc, as you stated yourself. Canada was also still part of the British Empire as it was still a dominion, however, it was not under the direct control of the British government, unlike in 1841 following the creation of the Province of Canada. You also said that the term “First Nations” is incorrect as they did not fall under the definition of a nation. A nation is not a political system or a form of government, it is a group of people in a certain area with a common history, culture, heritage, and language. Therefore, the First Nations do fall under this definition and the term is correct.
@@sudanese.ball77 Russia did have a colonial empire though it was only just the Alaskan territories which they soon sold to the united states of america
Franchement c'est militairement impossible vu la domination incontestée de la marine Britannique. C'est aussi une des raisons pour lesquelles la France a préféré se tourner sur le continent Européen.
CanvasCountryBalls, I like your video, but there a couple details you missed: 1. The Flag of the British Empire is supposed to be just England and Scotland. 2. You missed the Patriot Revolution, which is not minor at all! And 3. The Spanish controlled Oregon Territory before the British and Americans.
Interesting but too many mistakes. First, the Vikings never occupied that much land in Canada. Second, the Basques (often from Spanish side of Pyrenees), the Portuguese and the French made some “explorations” in the 1400’s and 1500’s (and also few English-sponsored explorers) but are not shown… Third, the French colony extended into today’s US earlier and did not push away the First Nations. Fourth, there was never a “blue ensign” of the British flag used in Canada (although Australia and New Zealand adopted it) - even for the French-speaking population. Fifth, Canada started in 1867, not in 1880, and it included two Maritime provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia). Sixth, Manitoba (1870), British Columbia (1871) and Prince Edward Island (1873) are never shown joining the Canadian Confederacy. Seventh, Newfoundland only joined Canada in 1949 and remained a British colony until then… (no today’s Labrador did not suddenly separated, as shown in the video, and was joined with its actual limits to Newfoundland in 1927). Last, Quebec referendum was for the whole province (not just the Southern part) and the separation would have involved Quebec territory as a whole (although negotiations would have certainly occurred regarding borders).
@@spongebakesquarepansgamingYes! Let’s stick together against the Canadian government. Let’s keep our ressources, money and culture here. Like it should’ve been from the beginning!
Istoriá Kanada 🇨🇦 1:28 Norveżskiy Pingvin 🐧 900-1050 2:25 Novaá Frantziá ⚜ 1605-1750 (Vive Henry IV) 3:43 Angliyskiy Severnaá Amerika 🏴 1735-1750 (Jerusalem) 3:49 Britanskiy Severnaá Amerika 🇬🇧 1750-1890 (God Save the Queen!) 5:00 Britanskiy Ontario 🇧🇲 1800-1880 (God Save the Queen!) 5:01 Britanskiy Kvebek 🇳🇿 1800-1880 (God Save the Queen!) 6:17 Britanskiy Kanada 🇧🇲 1880-1965 (The Maple Leaf Forever) 7:25 Kanada 🇨🇦 1965-Current (O, Canada) 7:39 Respublika Kvebek 🇲🇶 1990-1995 (Gens Du Pays)
Lots of people talking about Quebec's idea of independance being stupid. Hear me out: The main reasons Quebec wants to become its own country are related to them defending their cultural differences versus Canada. - Quebec dominantly speak Frenchs (Although the demography has decreased due to Canada's forced immigration to boost non-French speaking) in an attempt to assimilate/Make Quebec "less different". - Quebec is a secular intercultural state where religions don't have their say/influence in public (Largely due to the Catholic's Churchs abuses in schools and during Duplessis' era) - While Quebec is a "favored child" due to it being the 2nd largest poppulation province in the country, yes a lot of the money given by the Federal make other Provinces upset, especially the Western ones like Alberta. Quebec isn't exacly "poor", if we decided to exploit our ressources, we'd probably be able to boost our wealth. A standard West-Quebec grudge is regarding the pipeline. Alberta wants to export it to the Maritimes provinces but Quebec refuse the pipeline on its soil. Alberta's oil industry is important for its economy, just like hydroelectricity is important for Quebec, and with climate changes, anti-oil movement etc, the 2 sides are bound to disagree on the dilema of non-green vs green energy. - There is a common feeling for Quebeckers that everyone is out to get them. It isn't uncommon for Quebeckers to be insulted/harassed online by Canadians constantly mocking them on any platforms, social medias or online games, simply creating a gloomy feeling. Sometimes even British Commonwealth folks and Americans mock them, either due to their identity or by ignorance. - Speaking of indentity; Quebec, again, is French, secular and intercultural, the rest (or so) of Canada is English, non-secular and multicultural. - When it comes to the political parties, people think it's dumb for tye Bloc Quebecois to exist, because it take away A LOT of votes from the pre-dominant parties; Conservative, Liberal and NDP. They simoly don't understand the point and reasoning. Quebec isn't a deep follower of the Liberal's views (Especially not Trudeau's), but they also aren't in sync with the Conservative or NDP views either. The Bloc stands as a "None of you reflect enough what the poppulation of Quebec wants, so here we are!". In general, if every Provinces took the time to sit down and talk, and most importantly UNDERSTAND and AKNOWLEDGE (Not 100% agreeing, because you can't agree on an opposite belief than your own, but you can understand why the person think the opposite), and if the pointless grudge, disdain, dustrust and "hatre" disappeared, with Canada doing WHAT IT SHOULD to protect's Quebec's identity and respect its poppulation's choices when it come to secularism & interculturalism, Canada would be in a better state, and Quebec wouldn't try to leave. It's not just "They have the idea of wanting to leave", it's also Canada's actions pushing them to consider the idea of leaving. Thank you for coming to my politics pep talk 🫡 (Note a lot of Non-French Quebeckers will disagree with Quebec's idea of leaving, because unlike the average of Native Quebeckers (if that make sense) they feel connected to Canada, meanwhile lots of Native Quebeckers (French speakers) feel more connected to the Province than the country of Canada itself). I also invite everyone to do some history research regarding the 2nd refferendum and the conspiracies of Pierre Elliot Trudeau, how much money he spent to boost the "Non" campaign and the growing threats towards "Oui" sympathizers. 😇
1:The rest of Canada is secular 2:People "Make fun of Quebeckers" because your guys culture is different so its kind of an easy target, and it usually just jokes 3: Alberta and the western part of Canada are huge oil fanboys because of course, but in reality Ontario mostly supports green initiatives 4: What is the point of separating? You guys already get most of what you want anyways, you're basically just cutting yourself off from the benefits of Canada just because you can with no real upside. There is just so many logistical problems you're making for yourself for no real reason. 5:I guess different languages is fair but in reality it isn't a very big problem since most Quebeckers already speak some English 6:Majority of Quebec doesn't even want independence, if this somehow went through there would either be a civil war or more than half of your population just up and leaves, either case not good for the longevity of a free Quebec
@@delsymdrinker8064 I remember a story my father told me of when he lived in Ontario. He's a quebecer and when he was there he was painting cars and stuff like that. He was even known as frenchie. But basically one day while driving his car he got arrested by police. The police were searching for a white Ford Pinto which his basically what he had too. So they arrested him and they proceeded to take him out of the car and search the vehicle for stuff like drugs or guns (anything illegal really). Stuff like cutting seats and even the ceiling part (side story it was the 90s so there was like fur ceiling and stuff could also be hidden there) which are damages to the car btw. Anyways, they didn't find anything obviously and before letting him go they had to give back his papers. And instead of the joyful sorry that you guys are sooo stereotype so much for, he got told: "Go back to your fucking country" and so he came back and voted PQ since and Bloc too. Now are we surprised that such incidents that keep happening all around Canada (and online too) still to this day, reinforced that feeling of not being apart of this country? Yes, yes it does. The constant manipulation of the Canadian government in both referendum were also undemocratic and basically cheating. First time the prime minister Trudeau (not the son but his father) was in power and the PQ were basically in philosophical conflict with P-E Trudeau's government, and so when referendum came he pretty much had a big campaign of "we love you" and "don't leave" signs in Montreal and so the referendum had a 10% difference between yes and no. So we had Canadian interference in the first one how about the second. What happened to the second referendum was even worst imo cause during the referendum the Canadian government basically sent an influx of canadian citizen to vote in the ballots and change the vote hence interfering in said referendum again. Even if we had a third referendum, you guys would still fuck it up (and the idea as kinda died with the new generation although the PQ, if relected could reinspire the new generation it would be hard to get that close again.) So unless the canadian government wants to break even more relations with Quebec by limiting the province or increasing its taxes then yeah maybe a quebec independance movement will come back.
@@delsymdrinker8064 1. Quebec is secular and no parties in Quebec show any kind of religion appropriation which in Canada, the leader of NPD wears his dastar which shows an appartenance to sikhism. 2. Last comment I made about my fathers story. 3. Honestly another thing I've not seen mention his how Alberta pay only 5% in taxes while Quebec is paying 15% (14.98%) in taxes. We pay way more in taxes then any province in the country for... some reason? 4. The main benefits of independance and smaller nation overall imo its easier to have a nation with a single culture than one being multicultural with a region being way more intercultural. It creates instability and when you look at the history in general having large countries with millions of people is harder to manage then a lesser number which often more unified. 5. Honestly I have nothing against this point but we have law 101 that basically everything that enters the country in another language needs to be translated in english and... it kinda works but its also kinda cringe cause the titles for movies are pretty much mistranslated or translated in a "boring way" if that makes sense. Having a country would remove that need for everything to be absolutely french after like a couple years of setting everything up cause we wouldn't need to protect the language as much as we do. 6. The movement as taken a hit cause the new generation doesn't feel as compelled to becoming independant and there's that sense of complacency with Canada cause of how good we have it. But if a PQ wins at provincial elections its gonna be interesting to see whats up and if they can change the view of the new generation on sovereignity and independance. Also there's a good video from Alternatehistoryhub that kinda shows a more unbiased side. The thing is at the end of the day Quebec Independance would be a big gamble on a new economy but even if a referendum were to happen. There's nothing in the Canadian constitution that allows secession so... the govt could just let it happen and not even care about it lmao.
I like the video though it misses some stuff important to the creation of modern Canada in the East Coast. The Colony's of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland were separate from Lower Canada, Nova Scotia was broken up into Nova Scotia & New Brunswick in 1783 following the resettlement of the British Loyalists, and Newfoundland remained a separate colony and even a separate country for 20 years until joining Canada in 1949. The video also shows the creation of Canada at around 1890 when it happened in 1867, with Mantioba and Northwest Territories(incl todays Alberta, Saskatchewan, Yukon and Nunavut) joining 1870, BC 1871, PEI 1873.
@@hhhhhu5386 ça reste à voir tant que les Québécois vivrons l’indépendance ne sera pas mort de ce pays faussement créer, que l’on appel Canada , sans le peuple
Je n'y crois plus 😢 Et de toute façon... au rythme où vont les choses... QUE VOUDRAS VRAIMENT DIRE "QUÉBEC LIBRE" lorsque la population sera en majorité composé de gens qui n'ont aucun lien avec l'histoire du québec??
Free Quebec from Canada!!!!!!!!! As a québécois we whant dis to happen💙🤍💙🤍💙 Free Québec. We whant a new vote to be free Btw nice video I live to see the history of my contry.. well maybe future contry.! Long live Québec.
I am a very proud Canadian and Quebecan but I strongly disagree with making Quebec a separate country. Cuz if we separate all doctors don’t need to speak English or a foreign language, just French. So imagine you need vital information and your doctor speaks French, you wouldn’t be very lucky.
That's because litterally no one else was around. They didn't have a unified nation, identity, Infrastructure, nothing. Litterally just a number of tribes who did the exact same thing as the rest of humanity for time immemorial. Fought and killed eachother. Then Europeans showed up, fought and killed eachother, and then went on to create all those things that I previously mentioned. There's a difference here. No doubt about it. @alexl1178
Love the video and I hope you will take the time to read this comment. I noticed the comments section has a lot about missing details or slight inaccuracies, most of which don't bother me, as the video is a simplified history and portrays the general idea of Canada's history well. However, one part of the video, in my opinion, you may want to rethink. The first part of the video, you take the time to show the First Peoples, but don't show anything they did. While I'm sure this was not your intention, the sentiment does stem from and promote the racist notion that Natives are comparable to animals. The truth on the other hand is that they are humans just like the rest of the world and do tons of interesting things that country balls could narrate. Some constructive ideas: Showing the 3 separate migrations from Asia: Amerindian, Na Dene and Inuit. Within the Amerindian people's, perhaps show some events of the Pacific Northwesterners, the Cree and the Haudenosaunee nation. And very contextually important would be to show the Native country balls getting sick sometime after 1492, but before the French and British arrive. (50% to 90% of Natives died in this time period, which was very convenient for the new settlers). I hope this comment encourages you to study the amazing histories of peoples that some wish we would forget. All the best, keep making videos!
I don't think history talks enough about how the Vikings, one of the greatest raiding colonies of its time; came to Newfoundland and Labrador and were held back by the indigenous peoples of Canada. If it wasnt for the introduction of firearms, who knows how the inception of our country would have turned out differently.
Massachusets and Conneticut was settled by the British, the Dutch Settles modern New York and went north into the Hudson. Its called the Seven Years War, or French and Indian War, that took French colonies in Canada away from France.
The Vikings were already in Greenland before they discovered Vinland. Also, showing all of the First Nations as a single entity is grossly incorrect. There was quite a bit of movement among the various tribes. Fun Fact: The Inuit arrived in Greenland after the Vikings.
It is the view of people who thinks Natives were not humans but some sort of environmental angels… Yes, Natives fought one another, burned land, moved around, invaded, exterminated, enslaved others… They were (and still are) humans - with qualities and faults.
It's cute and all, but there are multiple mistakes : - L'Acadie became British posession in 1713 - 1867 is the year Canada was created, and it included New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (1965 is just the new flag). - And 'Newfoundland' and 'Labrador' are not the same thing.
Some errors here and there, Dominion was in 1867, NewfoundLand wasnt in the dominion until 1949. And also, by showing a partitionned Quebec around the 1995 referendum that also include northern ontario parts, you are taking position and giving weight to the thoses against Quebec independence using the fear of civil-war. There is not legal basis for this at all. Quebec province was a separate British colony and entered the confederation/dominion by a parliamant vote in 1867, it can decide to get out by democratic means and this mean the current integral frontiers. Anything other than that would mean to a redesign of frontiers according to ethnicity and would led to the balkanisation of Canada. No one wants that, except maybe some extremist in western Island Montreal.
Thanks for watching! Subscribe to the channel, like it, and if you liked this video, then share it with your friends!
have Another survey:
History of Central America or El Salvador please
Let the survey say, Central America or El Salvador, if El Salvador or Central America wins
Please take a survey, see if El Salvador or Central America wins please and I will subscribe to my other accounts 🥺👍💯
@CanvasCountryBalls, I like your video, but there a couple details you missed: 1. The Flag of the British Empire was just England and Scotland. 2. You missed the Patriot Revolution, which is not minor at all! And 3. The Spanish controlled Oregon Territory before the British and Americans.
The French allied with every single First Nation they met along the Saint Lawrence river, with the exception of the Iroquois. They sheltered the Huron (Wendat) who were being crushed by the Iroquois. And they finally made peace with the Iroquois in 1701 (Paix des Braves, peace of the braves).
@@MrKingsley The thing is the French did not steal any land. According to the Second Calumet Treaty by the Natives and Jacques Cartier, the French were given full authority over the Saint Laurent bassin, and could settle anywhere they pleased. Furthermore, not one french settlement was built on native land, and not one massacre outside wartime and against an openly hostile tribe ( I say tribe and not tribes because there was only one, the Iroquois of Lake Champlain, who literally led the Huron Genocide). The French did not loot, or rape, or kill. Whom would they? All the natives were their close allies, bar best friends. The French burried natives in European cemetaries, unlike any other european power in America, the French intermarried with natives without forced marriages unlike any european power, the French never did anything on any tribal land without said tribe's aproval first. In fact, the natives loved the French so much that when New France collapsed under British invasion, said Natives led a near decenial-long revolt led by a native for the return of the French, when the French did nothing. If you can name a single inch of land that was stolen by the New French Colonial Administration, I will cede my argument.
@@MrKingsleyFrance was way less bad with the natives tham the british. Stay delusional
@@MrKingsley Nah, France was way nicer to first nations around Quebec since there was no choice and they also mixed with them much more since there were so few French women(that's how the Metis people ended-up existing), so they had a lot more of them as allies. There is a reason why it's called the French and Indian war in English, because they were fighting French and Indian, not because the two were fighting each other, in French it's called the war of the conquest. The French had like 10x more First Nations allies.
At the time of that war there was 60000 French compared to 2 millions British in the colonies. This is why the French had to be nice to the First Nations, they did not have the numbers to fight with the British without the native population and didn't have the number to fight with natives either. Most of the massacres happening in New France was between the First Nations who always fought each other with the Iroquois getting guns first and massacring other First Nations before the French started arming their allies with guns and they got revenge.
Colonization was bad, but the Iroquois were also colonizing at the time with them expanding and taking other First Nations territories and New France only started being a true colony in 1673 by sending women to get the population growing, before that it was more of a trading post, that's why the population was so much lower than the British colonies.
The 1701 treaty with the first nations is still recognized officially in Quebec. The other guy is also wrong about its name, it's not the peace of the brave which is a recent treaty from 2002 between the province of Quebec and the Cree nations about economical and land development. The 1701 treaty is called the Great Peace of Montreal and made peace between New France and 39 First Nations, which was basically all the First Nations around the place and is also still recognized by the signatory First Nations.
New France was definitely a one of a kind colonization event in many aspects in how it developed more peacefully. After New France was given to the British in 1763 it was also the first time the British gave rights to Catholics and imposed little on the French living there by allowing them to keep most of their laws, language and religion, something the Irish would have very much wanted, and yet again it was for the practical reason they didn't want Quebec allying with the US. Ohio was also given by the Crown to Quebec at the time before the US declared independence because the French didn't try to push and exterminate the First Nations so them being a part of Quebec's territory protected the first nations living there since the Brits couldn't settle there legally anymore with the laws in the territory of Quebec being different. That is even referenced in the US declaration of independence as some of the causes.
Even today the First Nations in Quebec are doing much better than the First Nations in the rest of Canada.
@@ArmeniaMiko I agree but this relationship had changed a lot in 19 century. Until the sixties , natives were second class people in their own land. The things goes better now but it's far from friendship between French people and Amerindians even out of Québec.
@@ArmeniaMikoyeah sorry to burst your bubble but quebec religious groups still destroyed families by kidnapping kids to "educate" them aka forcing a religion and language on them
Police kidnapping native women to rape them and then abandon them in the middle of the woods is also a scarily common occurence that has not stopped
If you absolutely wanna compare us yeah our crimes are nothing like the english and spanish, but thats not because we were saint, we were dying in these frozen lands and needed help from the guys living here and we still did bad things to them, if canada wasnt a frozen wasteland, no doubts the natives wouldnt have been treated better than french teeated their african slave in haiti
The Natives did not disappear or move as the French explored the continent. They in fact traded with eachother and they allied in many wars.
THAT is a complete lie THE NATIVES WHERE KILLED AND FORCE TO READ THE BIBLE AND LOST THERE LAND AND BECAME USED TO WHITE INBREEDS IN THERE LAND AND EVENTUALLY BECAME MINORITIES!!!!!!! BULSHIT!!!
a lot of the dates where way off:
1- Dominion of Canada is 1867
2- Creation of "Canada" is 1931 after the Statute of Westminster ... in 1965, the flag just changed
3- you could have put the entry of Manitoba (1870), BC (1871), PEI (1873), alberta and Saskatchewan (1905) etc.
4- the british got on the east coast with the the Plymouth colonie way before you put the conquest of new york
5- etc etc
Still cool video
Depending on how you define “creation” of Canada you are also wrong. Most historians agree Canada began when the name came into common use in the 1790s. The first governors of Upper Canada and Lower Canada being cited as when Canada began its existence, or creation. Your definition of creation is very much in the minority, and the first I have ever heard it in my 2 decades of being a history nerd. You’re very much alone in this when the academic community would disagree with you. You might want to ensure you are accurate in your corrections of other people’s work.
@@MrKingsley your understanding of Canadian history is really bent. The Canadas (Upper and Lower) were created in the 1790s. They even had Governors to “govern” them. In fact the first Governor of “Upper Canada” (now Ontario) was Sir John Graves Simcoe, countless things and places in Ontario are named after him, and he was promenade battalion commander during the US War of Independence. Not too long into the future there was Major General Sir Isaac Brock, a hero of the War of 1812, who also served as Governor of Upper Canada. The former even wrote an executive order to outlaw slavery in Upper Canada in the 1790s. If Canada didn’t exist why were so many governmental decisions made by a “Governor” of a place called “Upper Canada”???🤔
Then in 1841 Upper and Lower Canada united to form the “United Province of Canada”… or more simply referred to as “Canada”. At this point, in 1841, Canada was granted independent responsible self-government. It was this government Sir John A. McDonald later lead in the 1860s through the Confederation Conferences BEFORE 1867. How can a Canadian government exist before 1867 if Canada didn’t exist yet, according to you?
All that happened in 1867 was that Canada Confederated with 2 other colonies, formed a federal government, slit Canada into 2 provinces while adding the other 2 colonies as provinces, all under a Constitution called the British North American Act (1867). Oh and a new capital for Canada was selected by the Queen. “New” capital, there had already been 4 capitals of Canada before Ottawa was made the new capital.
These are all common knowledge facts about Canada’s history, things not in dispute, and they collectively prove you very wrong. Educate yourself before trying to correct someone who isn’t even slightly wrong!
Including the Quebec failed Referendum on the map but missing the whole Newfoundland- Labrador- Quebec border problems; Reminding me there was a Real (lol joke in there) rebellion in Manitoba…
@@MrKingsley lol… your understanding of this is really superficial. Your conclusions defy a mountain of facts that completely disprove your conclusions and your supporting argument completely circumvents the meaning of the word “nation” and how Canada formed its national identity. You are using the word in the context of what is actually called “sovereignty”. If you make the argument Canada was not created until “sovereignty” was established, you at least have a point, one I disagree with, and most historians disagree but it would be at least a logic based, if very bias and narrow-minded, conclusion. We could part to agree to disagree.
However, when you base your biased, very superficial, conclusion on a completely inaccurate understanding of the word “nation” and how Canada formed its national identity, then you are just making yourself look very poorly educated. Your argument is not logical when you tie nationalism to sovereignty, they are 2 COMPLETELY different things.
Allow me to educate you. “Nationalism” is a liberal ideology that rose out of Europe in the 1830s & 40s. The first country in North America to begin adopting this liberal ideology was the USA in the wake of the Civil War. The war itself was fought over the argument of how much federal control the country would hold over the states, and the post-war was about how to build a national identity from coast to coast, starting with the Reconstruction program.
In Europe, over the pervious decades just before the US Civil War, they had several revolutions to reform many countries into nation-states. Forming the first national governments, before then all government forms were of the sovereign-state verity (to oversimplify a lot).
What this means is before the mid 1800s practically all sovereign countries were NOT nations, they had no nation-state ideology or political system. So the British Empire, French Empire, Prussia, Russian Empire, Spanish Empire, even the USA, all were NOT nations… yet!
This also means the modern term “First Nations” to describe aboriginal people is a huge misnomer, it’s a factually incorrect way to describe bands of tribal peoples. They never formed a political system that would meet the definition of a nation until long after white people established their own nations first.
This does not mean nations did not exist before the mid 1800s, the movement to form nations-states came from all existence of national identities. But the first sovereign-states to evolve into nation-states didn’t happen until the days of the United Province of Canada. Therefore, the first true “nation”, in what is now called Canada, was the Quebec nation. Which slowly formed following their defend in the Seven Years War.
This is why it is called a “confederation”. Different colonies, with their own national identities, joined together under a semi-sovereign independent federal government. That means in 1867 Canada was not yet one nation. We had no national identity tied to the semi-sovereign federal political system.
“Semi-sovereign” to mean a completely independent federal government, but any state level matters dealing directly with Canada’s sovereignty were still handled by the UK. This did not change until the Statue of Westminster was adopted in 1932. The only thing that changed in 1982 was the highly problematic Charter of Rights and Freedoms was added to the Constitution, the BNA Act (1867) was renamed, and the Constitution was repatriated. Canada is to this very day still technically a Dominion of the British Crown. The Monarchy is still the head-of-state in Canada, making us a Dominion. We just stopped referring to ourselves as a Dominion because the Pierre Trudeau government was very anti-monarchy and wanted to further grow Canada’s nationalism as being separate from the British, as opposed to the decades prior where our national identity was seen as linked to our mother country.
As for the issue of when Canada actually became a nation, and when we formally became a nation-state, well the latter is easy to answer. That was clearly established in 1932: the Statute of Westminster. But for defining when Canada actually became a nation, that’s a much more subjective question. Honestly, I do not hold a specific day or year when that could be said to have happened, because just like in the USA, it was a very gradual process of evolving from colonies to a federation, then to nation-state via a national identity. But what I will say for certain is that before the Great War we had no national identity. Our troops went into the War as good loyal subjects of the British Empire, realizing they had a very distinct difference to the British in the UK, and they did not appreciate being linked to their officer corps that could not identify with them as Canadians. This attitude, developed on the battlefields of Europe, did not exist in Canada itself until our veterans brought it home with them in 1919.
All this is why your argument holds no water. You ignorantly think nation meant sovereignty in the 1860s, and Canada as a nation is a very modern concept. Only around 100 years old. But gaining full sovereignty from the British has never actually happened, because we are still a Dominion, but a completely self-governing dominion with complete control over issues of sovereignty: the latter in 1932, the former in 1841… NOT 1867!
Cheers
@@James-zg2nl What MrKingsley said was correct, the country of Canada was established on July 1st, 1867, however, Canada as we know it today came about much later. The British North America Act established the Dominion of Canada which was self-governing and could elect its leaders. It was in 1867 when the Canadian federal government came into existence and began controlling Canada’s domestic affairs. For this reason, many Canadians consider 1867 as the year when Canada gained its independence. Of course, there still wasn’t a Canadian identity in Canada as many groups still identified themselves as either English, French, First Nation, etc, as you stated yourself. Canada was also still part of the British Empire as it was still a dominion, however, it was not under the direct control of the British government, unlike in 1841 following the creation of the Province of Canada. You also said that the term “First Nations” is incorrect as they did not fall under the definition of a nation. A nation is not a political system or a form of government, it is a group of people in a certain area with a common history, culture, heritage, and language. Therefore, the First Nations do fall under this definition and the term is correct.
It’s crazy to think Russia used to be part of 3 continents!
whats even crazier is that the british empire had land in all continents around the globe at one point!
@@KeniclesTheEpicyeah but that's a colonial empire ofc its gonna have colonies al over the world
@@sudanese.ball77 Russia did have a colonial empire though it was only just the Alaskan territories which they soon sold to the united states of america
It still has territories in pretty much every continent. Oceania might be an exception idk@@KeniclesTheEpic
Britain used to be part of 5 continents. Russia was nothing compared.
Nova Scotia wasn't officially British until the treaty of Utrecht 1714
You should had showed the Dannish flag for Greenland as well.
*Danish
Imagine si la France aurait gagner la guerre sa serait tout quebecois
Franchement c'est militairement impossible vu la domination incontestée de la marine Britannique. C'est aussi une des raisons pour lesquelles la France a préféré se tourner sur le continent Européen.
bonne chance c’est pas arriver
@@finiavanamandresy5460 je n’ai pas pansé à sa
Il est pas trop tard à mon avis projet franklock…
En d'autres mots, tout le monde serait con!
CanvasCountryBalls, I like your video, but there a couple details you missed: 1. The Flag of the British Empire is supposed to be just England and Scotland. 2. You missed the Patriot Revolution, which is not minor at all! And 3. The Spanish controlled Oregon Territory before the British and Americans.
Wow you're right!How do you know that?
@@monicachi6712 he googled it I’m a historian to
@@Wyvern188a real one or a person who likes history?
@@gabitolego well I love history so I declare myself a historian 😂
Well, i actually look at maps of the time since i really like to learn history. But, the Patriots’ revolution, i learned at school.
Interesting but too many mistakes. First, the Vikings never occupied that much land in Canada. Second, the Basques (often from Spanish side of Pyrenees), the Portuguese and the French made some “explorations” in the 1400’s and 1500’s (and also few English-sponsored explorers) but are not shown… Third, the French colony extended into today’s US earlier and did not push away the First Nations. Fourth, there was never a “blue ensign” of the British flag used in Canada (although Australia and New Zealand adopted it) - even for the French-speaking population. Fifth, Canada started in 1867, not in 1880, and it included two Maritime provinces (New Brunswick and Nova Scotia). Sixth, Manitoba (1870), British Columbia (1871) and Prince Edward Island (1873) are never shown joining the Canadian Confederacy. Seventh, Newfoundland only joined Canada in 1949 and remained a British colony until then… (no today’s Labrador did not suddenly separated, as shown in the video, and was joined with its actual limits to Newfoundland in 1927). Last, Quebec referendum was for the whole province (not just the Southern part) and the separation would have involved Quebec territory as a whole (although negotiations would have certainly occurred regarding borders).
Vive le Québec libre⚜️
Ouiiiiii!!!!
⚜️
💯
non we need to stick together
@@spongebakesquarepansgamingYes! Let’s stick together against the Canadian government. Let’s keep our ressources, money and culture here. Like it should’ve been from the beginning!
The best place in Canada is in Quebec. I live in Quebec.
2. 6 millions of quebecers don't have a family doctor...
Opinion, ❤❤❤
Istoriá Kanada 🇨🇦
1:28 Norveżskiy Pingvin 🐧 900-1050
2:25 Novaá Frantziá ⚜ 1605-1750 (Vive Henry IV)
3:43 Angliyskiy Severnaá Amerika 🏴 1735-1750 (Jerusalem)
3:49 Britanskiy Severnaá Amerika 🇬🇧 1750-1890 (God Save the Queen!)
5:00 Britanskiy Ontario 🇧🇲 1800-1880 (God Save the Queen!)
5:01 Britanskiy Kvebek 🇳🇿 1800-1880 (God Save the Queen!)
6:17 Britanskiy Kanada 🇧🇲 1880-1965 (The Maple Leaf Forever)
7:25 Kanada 🇨🇦 1965-Current (O, Canada)
7:39 Respublika Kvebek 🇲🇶 1990-1995 (Gens Du Pays)
I love it when people make history of where I’m from 🇨🇦🍁
Same
Same
Same
Nice but me from 🇺🇦
Same
AU NOM DU VIEUX PAYS, AU NOM DE LA FRANCE, VIVE LE QUÉBEC LIBRE.
Lots of people talking about Quebec's idea of independance being stupid. Hear me out:
The main reasons Quebec wants to become its own country are related to them defending their cultural differences versus Canada.
- Quebec dominantly speak Frenchs (Although the demography has decreased due to Canada's forced immigration to boost non-French speaking) in an attempt to assimilate/Make Quebec "less different".
- Quebec is a secular intercultural state where religions don't have their say/influence in public (Largely due to the Catholic's Churchs abuses in schools and during Duplessis' era)
- While Quebec is a "favored child" due to it being the 2nd largest poppulation province in the country, yes a lot of the money given by the Federal make other Provinces upset, especially the Western ones like Alberta. Quebec isn't exacly "poor", if we decided to exploit our ressources, we'd probably be able to boost our wealth. A standard West-Quebec grudge is regarding the pipeline. Alberta wants to export it to the Maritimes provinces but Quebec refuse the pipeline on its soil. Alberta's oil industry is important for its economy, just like hydroelectricity is important for Quebec, and with climate changes, anti-oil movement etc, the 2 sides are bound to disagree on the dilema of non-green vs green energy.
- There is a common feeling for Quebeckers that everyone is out to get them. It isn't uncommon for Quebeckers to be insulted/harassed online by Canadians constantly mocking them on any platforms, social medias or online games, simply creating a gloomy feeling. Sometimes even British Commonwealth folks and Americans mock them, either due to their identity or by ignorance.
- Speaking of indentity; Quebec, again, is French, secular and intercultural, the rest (or so) of Canada is English, non-secular and multicultural.
- When it comes to the political parties, people think it's dumb for tye Bloc Quebecois to exist, because it take away A LOT of votes from the pre-dominant parties; Conservative, Liberal and NDP. They simoly don't understand the point and reasoning. Quebec isn't a deep follower of the Liberal's views (Especially not Trudeau's), but they also aren't in sync with the Conservative or NDP views either. The Bloc stands as a "None of you reflect enough what the poppulation of Quebec wants, so here we are!".
In general, if every Provinces took the time to sit down and talk, and most importantly UNDERSTAND and AKNOWLEDGE (Not 100% agreeing, because you can't agree on an opposite belief than your own, but you can understand why the person think the opposite), and if the pointless grudge, disdain, dustrust and "hatre" disappeared, with Canada doing WHAT IT SHOULD to protect's Quebec's identity and respect its poppulation's choices when it come to secularism & interculturalism, Canada would be in a better state, and Quebec wouldn't try to leave.
It's not just "They have the idea of wanting to leave", it's also Canada's actions pushing them to consider the idea of leaving.
Thank you for coming to my politics pep talk 🫡
(Note a lot of Non-French Quebeckers will disagree with Quebec's idea of leaving, because unlike the average of Native Quebeckers (if that make sense) they feel connected to Canada, meanwhile lots of Native Quebeckers (French speakers) feel more connected to the Province than the country of Canada itself).
I also invite everyone to do some history research regarding the 2nd refferendum and the conspiracies of Pierre Elliot Trudeau, how much money he spent to boost the "Non" campaign and the growing threats towards "Oui" sympathizers. 😇
1:The rest of Canada is secular
2:People "Make fun of Quebeckers" because your guys culture is different so its kind of an easy target, and it usually just jokes
3: Alberta and the western part of Canada are huge oil fanboys because of course, but in reality Ontario mostly supports green initiatives
4: What is the point of separating? You guys already get most of what you want anyways, you're basically just cutting yourself off from the benefits of Canada just because you can with no real upside. There is just so many logistical problems you're making for yourself for no real reason.
5:I guess different languages is fair but in reality it isn't a very big problem since most Quebeckers already speak some English
6:Majority of Quebec doesn't even want independence, if this somehow went through there would either be a civil war or more than half of your population just up and leaves, either case not good for the longevity of a free Quebec
This is very good
Damn you said it way better than I ever could lmao
@@delsymdrinker8064 I remember a story my father told me of when he lived in Ontario. He's a quebecer and when he was there he was painting cars and stuff like that. He was even known as frenchie.
But basically one day while driving his car he got arrested by police. The police were searching for a white Ford Pinto which his basically what he had too. So they arrested him and they proceeded to take him out of the car and search the vehicle for stuff like drugs or guns (anything illegal really). Stuff like cutting seats and even the ceiling part (side story it was the 90s so there was like fur ceiling and stuff could also be hidden there) which are damages to the car btw.
Anyways, they didn't find anything obviously and before letting him go they had to give back his papers. And instead of the joyful sorry that you guys are sooo stereotype so much for, he got told: "Go back to your fucking country" and so he came back and voted PQ since and Bloc too.
Now are we surprised that such incidents that keep happening all around Canada (and online too) still to this day, reinforced that feeling of not being apart of this country? Yes, yes it does. The constant manipulation of the Canadian government in both referendum were also undemocratic and basically cheating.
First time the prime minister Trudeau (not the son but his father) was in power and the PQ were basically in philosophical conflict with P-E Trudeau's government, and so when referendum came he pretty much had a big campaign of "we love you" and "don't leave" signs in Montreal and so the referendum had a 10% difference between yes and no. So we had Canadian interference in the first one how about the second.
What happened to the second referendum was even worst imo cause during the referendum the Canadian government basically sent an influx of canadian citizen to vote in the ballots and change the vote hence interfering in said referendum again.
Even if we had a third referendum, you guys would still fuck it up (and the idea as kinda died with the new generation although the PQ, if relected could reinspire the new generation it would be hard to get that close again.) So unless the canadian government wants to break even more relations with Quebec by limiting the province or increasing its taxes then yeah maybe a quebec independance movement will come back.
@@delsymdrinker8064 1. Quebec is secular and no parties in Quebec show any kind of religion appropriation which in Canada, the leader of NPD wears his dastar which shows an appartenance to sikhism.
2. Last comment I made about my fathers story.
3. Honestly another thing I've not seen mention his how Alberta pay only 5% in taxes while Quebec is paying 15% (14.98%) in taxes. We pay way more in taxes then any province in the country for... some reason?
4. The main benefits of independance and smaller nation overall imo its easier to have a nation with a single culture than one being multicultural with a region being way more intercultural. It creates instability and when you look at the history in general having large countries with millions of people is harder to manage then a lesser number which often more unified.
5. Honestly I have nothing against this point but we have law 101 that basically everything that enters the country in another language needs to be translated in english and... it kinda works but its also kinda cringe cause the titles for movies are pretty much mistranslated or translated in a "boring way" if that makes sense. Having a country would remove that need for everything to be absolutely french after like a couple years of setting everything up cause we wouldn't need to protect the language as much as we do.
6. The movement as taken a hit cause the new generation doesn't feel as compelled to becoming independant and there's that sense of complacency with Canada cause of how good we have it. But if a PQ wins at provincial elections its gonna be interesting to see whats up and if they can change the view of the new generation on sovereignity and independance.
Also there's a good video from Alternatehistoryhub that kinda shows a more unbiased side. The thing is at the end of the day Quebec Independance would be a big gamble on a new economy but even if a referendum were to happen. There's nothing in the Canadian constitution that allows secession so... the govt could just let it happen and not even care about it lmao.
I like the video though it misses some stuff important to the creation of modern Canada in the East Coast. The Colony's of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland were separate from Lower Canada, Nova Scotia was broken up into Nova Scotia & New Brunswick in 1783 following the resettlement of the British Loyalists, and Newfoundland remained a separate colony and even a separate country for 20 years until joining Canada in 1949.
The video also shows the creation of Canada at around 1890 when it happened in 1867, with Mantioba and Northwest Territories(incl todays Alberta, Saskatchewan, Yukon and Nunavut) joining 1870, BC 1871, PEI 1873.
Vive le Québec libre!
Never!
@@hhhhhu5386 ça reste à voir tant que les Québécois vivrons l’indépendance ne sera pas mort de ce pays faussement créer, que l’on appel Canada , sans le peuple
Je suis français mais je comprends votre difficulté les québécois. Bonne chance pour obtenir votre indépendance !
Vive le Québec 🇲🇶
Je n'y crois plus 😢
Et de toute façon... au rythme où vont les choses... QUE VOUDRAS VRAIMENT DIRE "QUÉBEC LIBRE" lorsque la population sera en majorité composé de gens qui n'ont aucun lien avec l'histoire du québec??
I’m so proud of you
😉
@@CanvasCountryBalls I love you're vids how do i animate like you what app do you use
I use FlipaClip for my mapping but be probably doesn’t use it
Bro is his dad and he is proud.
U missed the resendential school part from the 1830s to the late 1990s
Free Quebec from Canada!!!!!!!!! As a québécois we whant dis to happen💙🤍💙🤍💙 Free Québec. We whant a new vote to be free
Btw nice video I live to see the history of my contry.. well maybe future contry.! Long live Québec.
First Ukraine
Then Palestine
Now this?
@@r2boii882 truss me it’s been a long time we whant dis. And we are making it happen 1 way or the other.
@@Quebec_libre-
That's what the Palestinians said and look at where they ended up
Courage; la révolution est proche !@@Quebec_libre-
I am a very proud Canadian and Quebecan but I strongly disagree with making Quebec a separate country. Cuz if we separate all doctors don’t need to speak English or a foreign language, just French. So imagine you need vital information and your doctor speaks French, you wouldn’t be very lucky.
People who live in Canada
👇
Le Québec est toujours pret à décider son futur. Quand le moment sera adéquat, nous choisirons la liberté.
Ça va venir les gars, vive la nation québécoise!
@@williame2439pour être honnête je préfère rester dans le Canada
@@LedurGtagmoi aussi
@@LedurGtag chacun son opinion, mais selon moi le Québec se porterait bien mieux en devenant indépendant
L'economie quebecoise ne survivera pas sans le canada. Vous n'avez pas assez de ressources.
I love this video :)
As a canaidian this is a very simple explanation
Why didn't you show New Brunswick forming when you showed upper and lower canada? Ouch. Right in my heart.
You missed all the first nations slaughtering each other by the thousands on a regular basis for 2000 years before Europeans arrived.
And yet they still populated the land till ye old genocide.
That's because litterally no one else was around. They didn't have a unified nation, identity, Infrastructure, nothing. Litterally just a number of tribes who did the exact same thing as the rest of humanity for time immemorial. Fought and killed eachother. Then Europeans showed up, fought and killed eachother, and then went on to create all those things that I previously mentioned. There's a difference here. No doubt about it. @alexl1178
hi i love your content
Love the video and I hope you will take the time to read this comment. I noticed the comments section has a lot about missing details or slight inaccuracies, most of which don't bother me, as the video is a simplified history and portrays the general idea of Canada's history well. However, one part of the video, in my opinion, you may want to rethink. The first part of the video, you take the time to show the First Peoples, but don't show anything they did. While I'm sure this was not your intention, the sentiment does stem from and promote the racist notion that Natives are comparable to animals. The truth on the other hand is that they are humans just like the rest of the world and do tons of interesting things that country balls could narrate. Some constructive ideas:
Showing the 3 separate migrations from Asia: Amerindian, Na Dene and Inuit.
Within the Amerindian people's, perhaps show some events of the Pacific Northwesterners, the Cree and the Haudenosaunee nation.
And very contextually important would be to show the Native country balls getting sick sometime after 1492, but before the French and British arrive. (50% to 90% of Natives died in this time period, which was very convenient for the new settlers).
I hope this comment encourages you to study the amazing histories of peoples that some wish we would forget. All the best, keep making videos!
I was waiting to see the Hans Island dispute get settled!
xD
Cool video keep up the good work
Indépendance for quebecccc!!
Better growth. I enjoyed watching this latest video. More changes than before 👍
the only person who know quebec’s borders
Labrador was part of Québec till 1927.
Im Canadian so cool to visualize this
Nice edit
Bro thought it was 2025 already 😂
Yeah man, like it's 2026 he's a year behind
@@johngriffin4502you're wrong it's 2136
Why did you say that! We could’ve played gta 6 early by tricking its developers
Gta6 got delayed to 2258
Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh,,,,,,,,,,,, its year 100 bizzillion
I don't think history talks enough about how the Vikings, one of the greatest raiding colonies of its time; came to Newfoundland and Labrador and were held back by the indigenous peoples of Canada. If it wasnt for the introduction of firearms, who knows how the inception of our country would have turned out differently.
Earned a subscriber
This is mostly true but not 100 percent true
Vive le Québec libre tabarnak!!
Massachusets and Conneticut was settled by the British, the Dutch Settles modern New York and went north into the Hudson. Its called the Seven Years War, or French and Indian War, that took French colonies in Canada away from France.
Nice content ❤
you should do history of quebec first thats where it started
As a Canadian this is our history simplified
Good
I remember when you commented on one of my videos a year or 2 ago. it made me so happy that day. anyways
There's an error at the end, it supposed to be 2024 but instead, it says 2025
So cool video
The Vikings were already in Greenland before they discovered Vinland.
Also, showing all of the First Nations as a single entity is grossly incorrect. There was quite a bit of movement among the various tribes.
Fun Fact: The Inuit arrived in Greenland after the Vikings.
Love it! This is my favourite type of history video display, cute country balls lol! Also love Canada from UK! 🇬🇧 ❤ 🇨🇦
We also love the uk from canada 🇨🇦🤝🇬🇧
@@fluxthegamer2618 Thank you!!!!! 🇬🇧🤝🇨🇦
iyi video knk.
0:31 sorry that was me
1:10 RED SPY IS IN THE BASE
A RED SPY IS IN THE BASE?
can you make a video of the history of the world countries in one big map
On future
@@CanvasCountryBalls thanks and i also hope you will reach 1M subs :)
soon
@@CanvasCountryBalls thanks waiting
Wow, amazing animation
Btw the place you highlighted was not Newfoundland, it was Labrador. Newfoundland is the island
Great edit but what happened to the Islands of Saint Pierre and Michelon,?They're technically french soil
When will it be re-uploaded to Orion?
When will I make the translation
Was very funny when all the native tribes just sat there all peaceful.... never happened, they fought one another from the beginning.
It is the view of people who thinks Natives were not humans but some sort of environmental angels… Yes, Natives fought one another, burned land, moved around, invaded, exterminated, enslaved others… They were (and still are) humans - with qualities and faults.
Got a problem?
Great, thank you for working hard on the videos❤❤❤
thank you
Quebec is my favorite
Portugal did the colony of Newfoundland and Labrador, why didn't it appear in the video?
7:39 There is no way There was an Event of a 1990s conflict between Canada and the US.
It’s Quebec :/
0:59 Good morning y'all, today is the Day of Leif Ericson. Eehnga Deenga Dogin!!
The Canadians never lose the war
It's cute and all, but there are multiple mistakes :
- L'Acadie became British posession in 1713
- 1867 is the year Canada was created, and it included New Brunswick and Nova Scotia (1965 is just the new flag).
- And 'Newfoundland' and 'Labrador' are not the same thing.
Great way to do social studies!
Canada 🇨🇦
Very cool !!
Орион привет!
Certified Canadian video
As a Canadian I approve this
You forgot the Korean war we participated in That wore a little bit. We sent soldiers and pilots
I was in a roblox countryball game then after Usa tried to eat me quebec left
Newfoundland wasn’t annexed. The republic voted on joining Canada
There were a few errors. I'm not going to list them knowing they won't be read, so I'll just end with despite that it was still an enjoyable video. :)
I love Canada from Armenia❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 🇦🇲🇨🇦
Good job 😮😮🎉🎉❤❤
what's the music i forgor
Hollow Knight
Did bro call the French and Indian war the Franco-English war?💀
Le dude qui enlève la région du Nord du Québec en 1995. 😂😂😂😂 dégèle!
Very well done!
my cousins live in canada so yay :) 😅
thanks for hearting! i love your content
Please , Iran next❤
I love Canada
From france/quebec ❤
Yay my contry❤🇨🇦
Country*
Free Québec 💙🤍💙🤍.
@@Quebec_libre- nuh uh!
@@IndoChinaYToffical we will make it happen no matter what it needs
@@Quebec_libre- dawg I live there, and I agree with ya
Awesome
I love it
What’s the music name 0:01
It’s hollow night o think
More specifically Dung Defender’s theme, from the Hollow Knight ost
correct me if im wrong but wasn't part of british colombia under spain at one point?
yey new video :D
Should've kept the Red Ensign. Nicer flag.
1500 - 8 is when Christopher Columbus sailed the ocean blue
E DANCE "I awlas come back... "
Some errors here and there, Dominion was in 1867, NewfoundLand wasnt in the dominion until 1949. And also, by showing a partitionned Quebec around the 1995 referendum that also include northern ontario parts, you are taking position and giving weight to the thoses against Quebec independence using the fear of civil-war. There is not legal basis for this at all. Quebec province was a separate British colony and entered the confederation/dominion by a parliamant vote in 1867, it can decide to get out by democratic means and this mean the current integral frontiers. Anything other than that would mean to a redesign of frontiers according to ethnicity and would led to the balkanisation of Canada. No one wants that, except maybe some extremist in western Island Montreal.
The first European after the Norse to explore what is now Canada was John Cabot in 1497 not 1600
Like if Quebec is canada. Remember folks Quebec wouldn't last without proper government backing!
Quebec wouldn’t last without Prairie money…
Day1: of asking for history of Africa
You missed the part where the natives all fought eachother and wiped out tribes
Because it is a LIE
Europeans took thier land and cleaned them from the face of earth
@@iy2318They aren't all dead they are still here. They only have tiny land the government only gives them