They Wouldn't Date A Soldier
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июл 2024
- 🔗 Full video: ruclips.net/user/whatever?sub_...
📅 Dating Talk is LIVE every Sunday & Tuesday 5:00 PM Pacific Time
▶️ WATCH LIVE: ruclips.net/user/whatever?sub_...
💎 Join: ruclips.net/user/whateverjoin
📺 Patreon: / whatever
👕 Merch: shop.whatever.com
💵 Tip Jar: paypal.com/donate/?hosted_butt...
🎥 Equipment: amazon.com/shop/whatever
📘 Facebook: / whatever
🐦 Twitter: / whatever
📷 Instagram: / whatever
👾 Twitch: / whatever
👽 Reddit: / whatever
🏴☠️ Brian: / bd_atlas
🌴 Linktree: linktr.ee/whatever
🎧 Listen: anchor.fm/whatever
The frustrating part is they don't realize that man represents the very freedom they're enjoying.
No, he doesn't.
@@phoqassoulhow does he not?
@tx5918 because going to war has got absolutely nothing to do with freedom.
@phoqassoul that's not the soldier's fault who signed up to defend our freedoms. It is the fault of the politicians who lied to the soldier and sent him to a war for profit.
@tx5918 yes, and.....? You have just admitted that the OP's original premise is wrong.
Also, a soldier going to war knowing he's not fighting for freedom but instead is killing innocent people for a politician, is an evil person. No wonder they get PTSD.
At least all the combat vets are safe from idiots like that.
It's the combat vets who are as much idiots as these women.
Yeah they don't need any more trauma in their life.😅
They assume anyone who has been to war has trauma from it.
Of course. Unless you're a sociopath.
Seeing people die hearing bombs go off, seeing wounds and hearing sceams is traumatic. Pulling the trigger is traumatic. Knowing the plane you just worked on got blown up or is built to blow someone up is traumatic. They are at war in the military designed to kill people and demand authority. The only ones that don't go home with trauma are either numb or genuinely don't care.
Haven't the veterans suffered enough in the war zones to even consider being with one of those 304's.
As someone who has been not just to war but in fire fights, if they can’t put up with my dark humor or my over alertness then they don’t deserve my BAH or discount
No one does.
Ration packs are probably better than their cooking.
@@user-nr5rw4gc6lLOL!!! You're probably on to something.
Any of you men who have been to war, don't you worry about what these women have to say. You're better than them, and you wouldn't want to lower your standards for them. An eagle doesn't worry about what a worm thinks of them
So, killing innocent people is acceptable to you?
@@phoqassoul yes. We didn't come to rule the world by being nice. Don't try that moral high ground shit with me
@andywitt7846 thanks for telling the world how shitty of a human you are and how shitty of a husband you'll be, as well as how it is wise to avoid dating military men.
@phoqassoul sure is! There is no innocent people in hamas!
Jesus christ bro this is a comment section
Not a bonfire fck man 🔥 🔥
🇺🇸 🇺🇲 🫡
Most people in the military NEVER go to war or see combat. Since the early 1900's or possibly earlier, it takes about 7 people supporting 1 person in actual combat,... that is a staple for almost every military on the planet for wars since that time (early 1900's).
That being said,... ANYONE with mental health issues do make a relationship more challenging,... that goes both ways though - and the younger people with lots of social media influence tend to have a MUCH greater rate of mental health issues,... especially young women,...
Having worked with A LOT of men who were in the military,... they tend to be more grounded and responsible - the military does have a LOT of resources for mental health (at least in my experience) and have increased those resources since the mid 80's.
They specifically said went to war though
If you don't think a person fundamentally changes enlisting in the military, then you're as blind as a bat.
The consistency is what is annoying. Their words made sense, yet you know that if it were a question about body count, they would not have the same energy. Rules for thy and Rules for me.
One of them said sexual history matters. Some of them are based.
@chrisg5709 yeah a lot of them SAY one thing because it sounds good.
What I'm hearing from them is 'im too self absorbed to care for anyone other than myself'. Marriage is not the carefree life these things want in their life... I feel sorry for them
What I'm hearing is "military men are fundamentally damaged"
Exactly! Super shallow and see nothing wrong with themselves 😅
‘It’s fair to judge someone for their past’
But angry when being judged by their past 😂
You can go to war and not have issues when you comeback
Not even close to true.
@@phoqassoul it is. I went I’m fine
@dalegreening6476 I guarantee you're not. And you will never be w good judge of who you are.
@@phoqassoulnot everyone who goes on a combat deployment is in a combat MOS.
@SymbolicLogic24 so? Is the Maria's accountant immune from being in the mafia? You don't have to pull the trigger to participate in immorality.
If some women can't handle a man's trauma, what are they good for then?
Because a man was stupid enough to seek out trauma.
So basically, we now know how to avoid getting entangled with most of these types. Thanks for the heads up!!
The worst part is that all of these women would unload THEIR pasts onto the men they're dating and will force these men to cope with it. None of them are willing to do this for the military men who went into battle for their freedoms.
They NEVER went into battle for their freedoms. They went into battle to do the bidding of a politician. Wake the fuck up.
@@phoqassoul you described every war in the history of human kind. All the wars were politically motivated. None of them were ever fully justified as good.
@@jeancarbonneau6966 your second comment completely contradicts your first comment. FYI.
This is so dumb and they have no clue lol PTSD doesn't mean anger and abusive, also we don't ask you to take on any trauma
You can "go to war" and never see combat. Not everyone is in a combat related MOS like infantry, medics or tankers.
WHY, THEY GET TO HAVE A BF AND CHEAT THATS LIKE THE BEST FOR THEM!
These bs are extremely shallow, and really have no idea who Fought and earned their freedom! Good though bc atleast they revealed themselves...
But what if they dont have any PTSD?
Everyone can have a preference. But most women say its no big deal that only men have to register at 18 but then say the trauma they have to carry is too much for them.
So they wouldn't date someone who brought them freedom?
What are you talking about? Freedom has nothing to do with the military. Stop exposing your brainwashing.
Yep, in a relationship, they are the ones who have to be the emotionally unstable one, so they can get their good girl points from "daddy"
The girl in red is correct = so based on her point, body count and promiscuous/unloyal to ones relationship behavior in their past matters.
If you dont know how to handle ptsd as a girlfriend I dont think you should date a war vet. It is safer for you and them. To the people hurt that they said no,why? Ptsd can be dangerous for both parties involved. If not handled correctly can cause more problems with the person with ptsd. I love and respect police fire fighters emts and vets but i wouldnt date one because i havent seen what they have seen and i am not mentally equipped to handle a breakdown that could happen. I am not on that level. It doesnt mean i dont love them as a person, i would even save them if the time came but I am in no place being on that level with them and its okay that I know that. I would cause more damage than I would good.
I have sat and listened to all ot of them let them vent a bit if they could shared laughs but that is all I know how to do. I dont know how to handle a ptsd out burst. Or how to help when the nightmares won't stop. I can be a best friend but not a lover. Because when a lover doesnt understand or cant help it hits harder and different than when a friend doesnt or cant.
Either they know the difference between Marines and soldiers, or they're liars 😂
Where are you going to find your 6 foot 11 inch of pure muscle, that has traditional values AND wants to take care of you financially if not in the military???? If not an actual warrior?
Me me me me me it’s all about my needs and my wants whatever doesn’t benefit me me me me. I don’t want any part of it. These women have no idea what the word sacrifice means.
Damn im out. Guys why I'm single.
Women dont judge my past.. also women u have to judge his past haha
All too self needy to have the ability to put the needs of anyone else above their own. Cause that's what you're looking for in a wife or the potential mother of your children right fellas?
War trauma has not affected my sisters family negatively.
His PTSD does not show up in anger against his family ..it does however make him a deadly protector of his family ...
Misleading caption. They didn't say no to all soldiers. Just ones who have been to war, which is an ever shrinking number. And that chick was pretty based, ngl
It's a serious consideration. I guess it would depend on the man.
Wow
The women are right this time
Whore says what?!
Ah girl don’t judge anyone, just be understanding if you’re interested in someone that’s been through a lot doesn’t mean they are all nuts all the time, nobody’s perfect and there’s plenty of warriors that suffer hidden away in silence and don’t take it out on the ones they love. Some people that never had an ounce of trouble could be the very ones to watch out for so really don’t judge, and if I ever meet someone that’s been through war I’ll be his no1 support esp if has ptsd.
Omfg im an american so of course i would
The woman with the Blonde hair was very nice and respectful explaining. I agree 💯
Tbh. That's admirable that they would say no. That means they are self-aware enough to know that they would not be good at emotionally supporting someone with that level of lasting, life long, trauma.
PTSD IS NO JOKE. I dated a guy that would wake up swinging and reaching for his gun. In his lucid daytime self, he would never do that. It was an emotional strain on our relationship because I didn't know how to support him, but wanted to. In the end he chose to end it because he didn't want to accidently hurt me and is still single to this day because of it.
I've also heard many women say that want a soldier but are clingy and needy and don't empathize or understand the nature of their job and what it can do to them, and then complain that their bf isn't Ken the barbie doll.
I woukd rather these women be realistic as to what they can handle, than to try and push through their limits for an image. The only one who gets hurt in that situation is the soldier.
The one sounded self aware, the rest latched on to that as a no. The others nos were selfishness, not self awareness. They were worried about themselves, not how they would handle a man who's been to war.
@@andywitt7846 not necessarily true. Them worrying about their physical safety and being realistic about their abilities if that man turned violent is selfish and self-aware. If they understand that they wouldn't be able to adequately protect themselves and decide to not enter that potential situation, then that's ok to be selfish. Not everyone is a hero and they shouldn't pretend to be.
@christinasherman9968 Not everyone with PTSD is like that. I have childhood trauma, yet I don't go around waving guns around, even at my lowest. I've literally had FAMILY try to KILL me, and don't act like that. PTSD is different from person to person. So the fact that you'd reject someone because of what they MIGHT do is pretty shallow. Not everyone is your boyfriend, and labeling them as such is stupid of you. My sister slapped me in the face once, so by your logic you're an abuser too. See the issue? See where you went wrong?
@christinasherman9968 when you said he chose to end it, I thought you meant he self deleted.
@@brandonbradley8480 you would be correct the PTSD looks different on everyone. Just to make myself perfectly clear. I am not labeling everyone with PTSD to be like my ex. I was using him as an example to my point. It is presumptuous of you to think that I believe they're all the same.
You see, it's ok to be shallow and reject someone who you don't think would be compatible for you. I also didn't go wrong in my statement. Knowing what you can and cannot handle as a person in a relationship is key. If those women see a potentially higher chance of danger because of that man's profession and don't want to take on that c potential risk, good for them in knowing that. It's better than them letting society tell them not to be "shallow " by some arbitrary metrics and date someone they're uncomfortable with.
This is actually ultra-based.
They don’t know one guy w ptsd from war and yet they talk out of their asses! Smh. And most guys wouldn’t date you 304’s!
The issue is the vast majority of them lie about their 304 past...