Implementing Integrated Deterrence

The concept of Integrated Deterrence is prominently featured in the National Security Strategy and the recently released, unclassified version of the National Defense Strategy. Now in its 16th year, the Naval Institute’s Defense Forum Washington will assemble civilian leaders, senior military, and members of Congress, to hear their views on what Integrated Deterrence is and how it should be implemented.

[@briansidney3403]

It’s good they sound like a think tank. There all at the table and that’s something I like.. it’s a good thing dude.

[@wanderer0013]

All the answers were delightfully vague

[@sb...904]

Damp Squib ... Utter Gibberish .

[@ProjectPete]

They all use the same key words. "Partners and allies", "Deterrence", "public-private partnerships", "Unprovoked War of Aggression".
These conversations are indicative of group-think when they all sound exactly the same. Same think-tanks provide the, same ideology, same outlook, same phraseology when answering questions. The cracks are showing in her answers.

[@trillstina]

Exactly. It takes intentionally learning an entirely different language to speak this way. This calls to question, why? You don't need to use loaded language like this if you're on the up and up and if your speaking factually.

[@briansidney3403]

Weak men create hard times Mr, president..

[@xushenxin]

The reason this talk is public is because it is propaganda and it is 100% nonsense. You don't discuss whatever deterrence with "audience", because it has nothing to do with public and public has zero capacity to understand. The speaker is eloquently talking bullshit and that's what they do. Don't waste your time in this video. There is 0 usefulness in this video.