@@Leman.Russ.6thLegion I am seriously considering getting this scope over a Mark 5 2-10. The upgrades to the Gen2 make this scope really the only one of its kind.
Love the video. I run the FX 1.5-15 on my LMT-MARSL. I went with the capped model just so I could get lower turrets lol. I don't dial anyways, but still have the option. Plus it protects my turrets when my gun falls. I would love to see a low profile side focus and brightness knob as you can't run an offset with it without sticking way out there lol. Do you find the length and weight reduction on the 1-10 worth it over the 1.5-15? Also did you get the standard march (non package model). I like the sunshade with the flip cap. I'm probably going to get the 1-10 for my PDW setup as I can't fit my RH25 infront of it with my 7.5" handguard lol.
@@broscience5876 great. But I really only got this scope for the 10 power at such a small package. I think there are far cheaper and far more capable lpvos for 1x use, than this scope. The eye relief is excellent, but there is a very small distortion around the bessle on 1x. Not really very noticable unless I look for it. Also, not bad for me cus I leave the scope at 5x plus, and use my top dot for 1x pretty much exclussively. I reitterate, I bought it for it's top end power and small weight/size. I run a red dot for any 1x stuff. It's so much better.
Shouldve got a wasr
with a dust cover mounted scope
I just got the March dual reticle 1.5-15x. Love it. Its got a 42mm objective, versus the 24mm on the shorty, which is great for low light shooting.
@@sallutz that's cool. For what type of gun?
Very nice!!
I like it. for dmr I need way more mag. Maybe 4-20 at least
That's a sweet build
@@MichaelKemner-wj9nc ur sweet
That's sweeeet
The false start intro did it for me
@@Eastwood007x just making sure you're listening!
"focusing lens adjustment" is called a diopter. All magnified optics have them.
@@Theman3806
man, im a shotter, not a scholla
@@Leman.Russ.6thLegion hahaha. Thanks for the review. I'm in the market for one and you're like the only dude with a review so I appreciate that.
Awesome setup!
Was the gen 1 March a 30mm main tube?
@@markbaze2225 30 in the back and 33 in the front for literally no reason. This one is 34mm all.
@@Leman.Russ.6thLegion I am seriously considering getting this scope over a Mark 5 2-10. The upgrades to the Gen2 make this scope really the only one of its kind.
Love the video. I run the FX 1.5-15 on my LMT-MARSL. I went with the capped model just so I could get lower turrets lol. I don't dial anyways, but still have the option. Plus it protects my turrets when my gun falls. I would love to see a low profile side focus and brightness knob as you can't run an offset with it without sticking way out there lol.
Do you find the length and weight reduction on the 1-10 worth it over the 1.5-15? Also did you get the standard march (non package model). I like the sunshade with the flip cap.
I'm probably going to get the 1-10 for my PDW setup as I can't fit my RH25 infront of it with my 7.5" handguard lol.
@@GldenRetriever standard gen 2 model. It's worth the weight if you are doing a smaller gun.
Think this is the only video of the 1-10 gen 2 on the internet right now
@@nicholast.6636 deon have march promo material out, but i havnt seen any other private owners
How about eye relief for CQB? Trying to decide between this and the S&B 1-8 Dual CC.
@@broscience5876 great. But I really only got this scope for the 10 power at such a small package. I think there are far cheaper and far more capable lpvos for 1x use, than this scope. The eye relief is excellent, but there is a very small distortion around the bessle on 1x. Not really very noticable unless I look for it. Also, not bad for me cus I leave the scope at 5x plus, and use my top dot for 1x pretty much exclussively.
I reitterate, I bought it for it's top end power and small weight/size. I run a red dot for any 1x stuff. It's so much better.
@@Leman.Russ.6thLegion thanks man.
Does palmetto offer this rifle for cheaper?
@@MiseryKY lmfao
Is this video mirrored?
@@overseeingeye no just in reverse from the phone camera