Creo Simulate - Buckling Analysis - Creo Parametic

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 22 авг 2024

Комментарии • 16

  • @nabeelk
    @nabeelk Год назад +1

    Thanks Dave!
    Very informative!

  • @Aviyoyopdx
    @Aviyoyopdx Год назад

    Not sure if this would produce significantly different results, but is it correct to apply a negative y direction load to the entire inner surface of the hole? Would it be more accurate to apply the load to the half of the hole surface that is in the direction of the load?

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  Год назад

      As I note in the on-screen annotation at 1:30, I could have used a Bearing Load instead. The Bearing Load functionality uses a non-Hertzian distribution in which the load is applied over half the surface with the peak being in the direction of the force and tapers off to zero at the sides. Why did I use a regular Force/Moment Load instead of a Bearing Load? I don't remember. It might have been a wrong pick, but the point of the video was to show people how to run Buckling Analyses. Hence the on-screen annotation I added during the editing process.
      I have a separate video on Bearing Loads if you want more information regarding that command.

  • @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep
    @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep 8 месяцев назад

    Sir in case of both end fixed ,how to give proper boundary condition for buckling...im unable to do the same...kindly help...

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  8 месяцев назад

      By both ends, I assume you mean top and bottom. Buckling requires that the part be under compression. It might be fastened at both the top and the bottom, but the load has to be transmitted from something through the fasteners into the part. Both ends aren't actually fixed. Load has to be coming from somewhere.

    • @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep
      @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep 8 месяцев назад

      Thank you for your response...

  • @adruvr1
    @adruvr1 Год назад +1

    How accurate are creo simulate results compared to other leading FEA packages?

    • @nabeelk
      @nabeelk Год назад

      Since Creo Simulate uses ANSYS Solver, so I presume it will be as accurate as ANSYS could be.

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  Год назад +2

      Information on the verification models is available in the PTC Help section. As you will see there, the results are very close.

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  Год назад +2

      Actually, Creo Simulate uses Geometric Element Analysis and a proprietary solver. I know the branding can be confusing, but Creo Simulation Live is the one based on ANSYS.

    • @nabeelk
      @nabeelk Год назад

      @@CADPLMGuy Thanks for the correction.

  • @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep
    @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep 10 месяцев назад

    Sir can you explain the uses of buckling mode 1 or 2...im confused..

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  10 месяцев назад

      Buckling mode 1 is where it’s likely to buckle first. But if you’re Buckling Load Factors are low, you might want to look at additional buckling modes to figure out how and where to stiffen the model. If your BLFs are high, the mode shapes can give you an idea where to lighten the model.

    • @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep
      @AbhishekKumar-vf5ep 10 месяцев назад

      @@CADPLMGuyThanks for replying...i got it..

  • @classicdesign8129
    @classicdesign8129 Год назад

    Sir i want one video from you about how to create parametric model from step files, please guide us

    • @CADPLMGuy
      @CADPLMGuy  Год назад +1

      I recommend you watch my video on importing and exporting STEP files.