The theory is good, but I would like to point out a few things. Is the entire segment of "2:17AM" happening in real-time? If it is, it would be inaccurate as the events are too fast. What are causing the sparks on the 2nd and 3rd funnel? Please do explain its etiology when it comes to "Break-Up Explanation" you only showed and told us what happened instead of explaining what causes the following to happen. Personally, the Stern sinking seems to slow, it should be under by at least 2:21-2:22, having it sink at 2:23 becomes a bit unrealistic.
Why is the entire 2:17 section to fast in my opinion it makes a lot of sense it accounts for those who saw the 1st and 2nd funnel at the same time or is it something else? The reason there are sparks from both the 2nd and 3rd funnel have sparks is because when the guy wires snap they then whip against the base of the funnel cause sparks due to hitting metal but also activated the coal in the funnels uptakes resulting in a spark explosion. I will make a video explaining why these events happening like the break up. The stern dose going down at 2:22 but at the end of 2:22 to account for those who saw Titanic go down at 2:23.
@@SyAnimates I see, good reasons for the sparks on the funnels. , but the "2:17AM Section" is too fast, and speaking in physics, it is impossible to sink that rapidly, Titanic had many rooms, hallways, decks. Which would take time for the water to get around, the fastest water could go from the bridge to the area by the 3rd funnel would be 50 seconds to 1 minute and 20 seconds.
The theory is fine in some parts but id like to point out that the ft is too under supported here, if it was like this it would just come off at the surface, and also every thing that shin said also
well why would the forward tower come off it still has parts of D deck E deck and F deck holding it to the stern. Sure the anti fouling isn't holding but why does that make the forward tower come off?
@@SyAnimates It all about the weight of the tower, as it weighs a lot so a few decks wouldn’t keep it up. The anti fouling was supporting the upper decks holding the tower
Enjoy!
how do you only have 30 subscribers you deserve so much more than that
Thank you so much
The theory is good, but I would like to point out a few things.
Is the entire segment of "2:17AM" happening in real-time? If it is, it would be inaccurate as the events are too fast. What are causing the sparks on the 2nd and 3rd funnel? Please do explain its etiology when it comes to "Break-Up Explanation" you only showed and told us what happened instead of explaining what causes the following to happen. Personally, the Stern sinking seems to slow, it should be under by at least 2:21-2:22, having it sink at 2:23 becomes a bit unrealistic.
Why is the entire 2:17 section to fast in my opinion it makes a lot of sense it accounts for those who saw the 1st and 2nd funnel at the same time or is it something else?
The reason there are sparks from both the 2nd and 3rd funnel have sparks is because when the guy wires snap they then whip against the base of the funnel cause sparks due to hitting metal but also activated the coal in the funnels uptakes resulting in a spark explosion.
I will make a video explaining why these events happening like the break up.
The stern dose going down at 2:22 but at the end of 2:22 to account for those who saw Titanic go down at 2:23.
@@SyAnimates
I see, good reasons for the sparks on the funnels. , but the "2:17AM Section" is too fast, and speaking in physics, it is impossible to sink that rapidly, Titanic had many rooms, hallways, decks. Which would take time for the water to get around, the fastest water could go from the bridge to the area by the 3rd funnel would be 50 seconds to 1 minute and 20 seconds.
@@KiwiKiwf ok I will take that into account
@@KiwiKiwf thank you for explaining
this might actually be the one
The theory is fine in some parts but id like to point out that the ft is too under supported here, if it was like this it would just come off at the surface, and also every thing that shin said also
well why would the forward tower come off it still has parts of D deck E deck and F deck holding it to the stern. Sure the anti fouling isn't holding but why does that make the forward tower come off?
@@SyAnimates It all about the weight of the tower, as it weighs a lot so a few decks wouldn’t keep it up. The anti fouling was supporting the upper decks holding the tower
ok i will take this into account
The theory is fine, the animation is *AMAZING* ! but small issue, the events of the plunge are too fast. Good work though.👍
Thank you so much for commenting!
@@SyAnimates no problem!