Special thanks to Ridge Wallet for jumping in to sponsor today's video. Gotta say, at first I didn't know what to expect but I was sold with just how compact the wallet is. if your in the market, they are best at what they do - get the titanium one cause its just so cool. ridge.com/FNE
Russia (as well as other vast countries) uses twin-engine fighter jets, as they have to cover long distances and -in case of emergency- the nearest airfield could be far away. Most other countries, though, prefer single-engine jet fighter, so the russians create a single-engine version of their own jets. It's an export-oriented plane, not a backbone of russian forces or something.
They have not dominated for only one century , whenever / wherever , in the long run/historically dominant ,as one civilization disappeared they rise with a new stronger , hence supremacy.
Всё проще мой друг, дело в том что тяговооружённость у совковых двигателей низкая, по этому используют спаренные двигатели.😘 Два двигателя это не плюс, а всегда минус.
@@constantinemalkovich9089 Откуда ты такой не совковый взялся? Два двигателя Су-57 могут выдавать максимальную тягу на форсаже 38 тонн в секунду, тогда как у F-22 только около 32 тонн в секунду.
Russian jet colors are mostly localized, though they've been trying a similar simple two-tone color on some of their 35 (both Flanker & Fulcrum). America has a lot of customers on all hemispheres, so they opt to have the simple grey paint that should blend in most skies.
I just get the feeling that this is a modern, single seat, single engine multi role fighter bomber intended to be sold to Russia's Allies and Countries that operate Russian aircraft to replace old end of life Mig-21's, Mig-23's, mig-27's, and Su-22's.
@@verdorrenstudios no it won't hahahahhahaha not with all these sanctions. Russia can't make its own complex electronics and absolutely cannot match the west in precision and electronics. Have you seen the Su-57? Unshielded compressor blades, fucking exposed screws and indents on the wings. No shot is that a stealth fighter
why do americans hate russia so much..? I dont care who is better, this plane is beautiful and I think it will eventually make it to the skies. instead of hating let's try to compete and make better machines, if history thought us something, the most powerful nations always fall while in denial of not being the best anymore.
One important thing to consider is by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production, the NGAD 6th gen will be as well. Personally, I do not see that as a "Checkmate".
That's assuming that the Su-75 ever even makes it out of the design stage, let alone prototyping / testing. The NATO reporting name for this thing should be the Su-75 Fantasy, or Su-75 Fictional.
You can say this for the F35 too, But the export models of weapons are always second best, no one sells their best everyone expects this, but whatever we only know what They want us to know more likely what their adversary knows n zero more
The f35 was made to fill requirements by the us military and serve as an export platform for their allies. As far as I know, the Russian military didn’t ask for this and may not ever buy it. This is made entirely by the company with intention to export. In some regard it is competition as export products but in reality the customers would be different. US and Russia tend to sell to different countries.
It's so stealthy that not even the Russian test pilots have ever seen it fly. It perfectly compliments the new Ilyushin super sonic cargo plane that can carry four tanks, and the clear plastic drones that were purpose built to hunt F-35s.
typical Americans who can't see their opponents do well, whats up with the lousy defense systems of America that can not compare with that of the Russians
It is the Russian approach to stealth The Su-57 also has the same approach, but because it is less stealthy it can be seen flying (very rare but sometimes happens)
calling the Su-57 even some what stealth is a reach, with no RAM (Radar Absorbant Material) and exposed bolts on the wing pannels. Yeah it's an approach but even their stealth fighter can't be made in quantity or even with good quality. let alone the fact that it's radar cross section would be embarrassing to miss.
@@silver_css3734 It has the RCS of a clean F/A-18 Super Hornet; so about ~1m² At best, is a low observable 4.5 generation fighter, or a very bad 5th generation fighter The thing doesn't even have functional missile bays... functional for a (theatrically) 5th generation fighter (It is basically the same as a WW2 bomber, not pressurized), so asking it to be as stealthy as any other modern aircraft is kind of asking for too much
i remember that there is a film where a new prototype of plane that was controled by an AI(american) was added to a squad and started to fly by himself
@@KD-wl3fk 😂😂😂 you guys are funny. Interesting seeing western equipment getting shredded and blown to bits right now. I guess you guys aren't so tough after all.
@@henrychu495 If US dare to send their f35s to ukraine. Then sure you'll see them blow to bits. Btw US technology is soo advanced that one f35 was swimming near South China Sea. 😂😂
All very impressive, but the SA-32 Thunderbolt Starfury is capable of reaching orbit and operating as a space superiority fighter, as well as being armed with four advanced plasma pulse cannons and has hardpoints for up to ten additional weapons. It's also every bit as real as the SU-75.
It will also fire the “SuperZircon” missile, which flies at roughly light speed and has a KyberCrystal warhead, which can destroy a whole planet. Ask the citizens of Alderaan how real this weapon is…
Strictly speaking the SA-32 "Thunderbolt" is a transatmospheric air and space superiority fighter capable of force projection as far as jump gates are available due to its only limitation being a lack of jumpdrive.
@@tombrunila2695 damn people really hate russian developments, yet they hype the american FA-XX so much (which even the animation itself doesnt exist yet) lmao. cant you just take the joke without having to despise russia?
@@773-o2n, the only stuff that is being hyped is Soviet/Russia weapons! They are all supposed to be vastly superior, but when the shooting starts they prove to have been expensive targets! And then comes the claim that the Soviet Union or Russia had delivered substandard "export" versions of the weapons to their most important clients! NEVER is there even a hint of that before the shooting starts. Before the claim is that these super weapons will make mince meat out of Western weapons! And this "new" Russian fighter is a copy of what Northrop had developed nearly 30th years ago!
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the Poseidon nuclear torpedo. Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
IF IT FLIES within 5 years, they are ahead of the F-35. At least from a technological perspective, as they use tech of today, not from 20 years ago. Again: IF IT FLIES.
and even tho the 75 is suppossed to be stealth it still uses the IRS dome... which is literally a fucking lighthouse on a radar... meaning its stealth capability is shit... and it doesnt even exist...
@@badi95toinfinity wow wow look whos talking, filled with russian propagannda. Here's a fact, Russia's military is in such a bad state that even though its the second strongest army it cant even defeat ukraine
@@badi95toinfinity also your ass fails to realize that su 57, the apparent russian 5th gen aircraft only has 21 aircraft, and only 11 of those are in service and it took over 40 years for it to enter service, developed 1975, in service 2020 . Whilst the f-35 started development in 1995 and first entered service in 2015, thats 25 full years faster than the su 57 annd it already has over 1000 aircraft in service. So your dumbass needs to wake up and understand that without other buyers russia does not have the capabilities or the requried technology that can rival the US's
India backed out of a potential deal with the SU57, due to technical failures and engine malfunctions. Not what was promised to them.. since no one is lining up to purchase the 57 its program is a failure.. checkmate my a** 😂
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the "Poseidon nuclear torpedo"(Status-6). Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
@Tylon Holmes lol i love the derailing topic. this isn't about healthcare, Russian healthcare is awful too but unlike russia us can afford 800+ jets without its economy collapsing,
@@tophatv2902 Естественно при таких бюджетах они очень хотят воевать(я про США), и Россия при бюджете в несколько раз меньше всё равно обходит США в некоторых структурах. При таких бюджетах, которые США выделяет на армию в год можно было бы уже медицину бесплатной сделать. Но нет, США будет говорить о том, что им нужна мощная армия на триллионы долларов. Я очень люблю, когда сравнивают Страны по количеству танков самолётов и т.п. Ну много у вас самолётов, молодцы. Системам ПВО России хотяб разогреться дадите.
It looks like they combined features that the suits and stockholders in the military opted out of (YF-23 and X-32/F-32). Will be interesting to see what it's capable of.
From the end of the video, it seemed like he was talking about defense contractors being afraid it would take sales away from the f35, which seems reasonable if it is developed quickly and at near the proposed price.
Su 57 only 12 units and 2 crash so only 10 now Su 75 ? J 20 has 150 units so far J 31 only 5 units so far F 35 has 500 units worldwide so far ... You decide....kkkk
@@johnathanclayton2887 30 million dollars is impossible for russia becouse its the same price as j 10 from china Su 75 is like 70 million dollars for reality check not a virtual one....
@@MrTaramkaya don't forget america lost against fucking farmers in Vietnam and they did not do shit in Korea and they lost in Afghanistan plus ukraine for Russia is going well they are already destroying Abrams and many other nato tanks.
@@eliasziad7864 except the Concorde was much more reliable than the TU-144, the Concorde could supercruise at Mach 2 while the Tupolev couldn't, the passenger cabin in the Concorde was as quiet as a normal airliner while the TU-144's was so noisy that passengers had to pass notes to each other, The Concorde had a brilliant safety record apart from a crash that was caused by tire debris from another aircraft while the TU-144 had 226 failures during 102 flights. The only thing the Tupolev beat the Concorde at was speed
History is replete with high-flown concept planes that under-delivered...or, by the time the kinks in the system were worked out, their "cutting edge" technology was already obsolete. So, I'll worry about the Checkmate when it actually moves beyond 'flying prototype' and into actual production. Until then, it's a paper tiger.
@AllTradesGeorge The checkmate isn't exactly "cutting edge" at this point. Not even for Russia. It's more like playing catchup with America, at least insofar as their military purpose aircraft exports are concerned.
Finally Sukhoi provided data about how the new Su 75 can easily destroy an F-35... A Tu 95 loaded with all blueprints and promises of this marvellous plane should have to fly above an airport where there is at least an F-35 landed in the middle of the parking range, very visible. Then the Tupolev -95 would make a landing crash on the F-35...
No offence, but some bragging the air superiority out of the US with RUS, I immediately thought of Vietnamese using 2 outdated subsonic Mig-17s vs F-4s or F-105s. Migs were always outnumbered by the US in 1:12 ratio , but managed to do so much damage to the US. You can have all the funny gadgets and AI, but pilots are pilots.
@Brian Roome 1:12 number ratio, 2:1 kill ratio means 1:6 of actual K/D rate, dude. Take some maths. Or in this case, can't swallow the truth against White Supremacist about "the US is invicible" arrogance, you could say.
F-35 doesn’t have the highest thrust-to-weight ratio, but its engine sure as hell does. If they can’t beat that, they’ll just have a cool-looking fighter that still needs to hang stores externally.
@@graham1996 false, For empty weight, F-35A T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50's. You haven't normalised the range between the two aircraft design.
@@graham1996 The basic wing loading without body and vortex lift. F-35A Empty weight: 29,300 lb Wing area: 460 ft² Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet. F-16C Block 52 Wing area: 300 ft² Empty weight: 18,900 lb Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet. F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C. F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. There's a reason for the engine upgrade program. F-35A's 45,000 lbf thrust upgrade road map is 1.57X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. F-35A needs at least 44,330 lbs thrust to preserve 1.55X scale factor There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C to F-35A on basic wing loading, engine thrust, and empty weight. F-35A's wing area is influenced by weight growth and F-16C's empty weight wing loading target.
They are working to improve the F135 with 11% more range 10% more thurst and 50% better thermal management. To my knowledge though GE and RR are working on a next gen engine to possibility repower the F35 and 6 gen aircraft.
"The 75 in the name is the amount of years Sukhoi will need to make an actual stealth fighter, because they clearly don't know how to make one after the failure of the Su57. I see you over there, don't try and sneak up on me." - Tym3 Glitch
It doesnt look ANYTHING like the F-35. It looks similar to the SU-57, which is the point as it's sharing a lot of tech/design from that platform which keeps its cost low.
Hi, really like your video as usual. But I have noticed one little mistake. MAKS is not an annual airshow. It is organized every two years. Greetings from Russia :)
and look at the cockpit of YF-23 and on the wings of YF-22 and compare this to su-57, its simular right? maybe the only original things of su-57 are engines
@@michalc1018 No! They‘ve stolen the engines from Star Wars or from some other Hollywood shit. I think the Russians have also stolen the english language but they reproduced it to cyrilic, that‘s why we don‘t understand it anymore. However, the first thing they‘ve stolen from the US was the Idea of people having a need to breath to stay alive. (Sarcasm)
@@BlackPhantom_II Even IF, it couldn't be a "copy". More like a Mash-up, and if someone could pull that off, Congratulations. You solved the "what if"-problem, in Aircraft construction.
The air inlet reminds me of the American x-32 when they tried air-2-air refueling the refueling thing headed for the massive air intake on the x-32, which was a little bit concerning for the pilot.
Several problems I can see plaguing this aircraft. IF, and it’s a big if, Russia can pull this off at a $30 million price point, AND meet all of its specifications it claims it can achieve, it will be beyond impressive, considering they have yet to do it with the Su-57, of which only 14 have been built to date (which only have 2 units that are combat-ready, 12 used for training craft), and they have struggled to build even those numbers. Mind you, this hasn’t even flown yet. No flight testing has occurred. They are years away from mass producing this fighter, and it may not even see flight before the advent of sixth-generation fighter jets, which China, the UK, France, and the US are already developing (the US already announcing they have test flown a sixth-gen prototype). It may be outdated before it even leaves the ground. I would be very surprised if it can meet the $30 million price point without making significant sacrifices in capability, or Russia pressing forward, and omitting certain technologies initially promised to bring down the cost. Like I said, they haven’t been able to do it with the Su-57 yet, which is likely going to sell closer to $70 million/unit, up from the $50 million price point initially advertised. That said, if this is what Russia claims it to be, and they can field it in comparable numbers to rival the F-35, which has over 700 produced as of November 2021, and over a half-dozen buyers, it could be a beast, and a formidable rival. But I’ll believe it when I see it… If I see it. As I said earlier, we’re still waiting on the Su-57, which still has no foreign buyers. And with no foreign buyers, neither program will be a serious rival to the F-22/F-35, or even the J-20.
The F 35 was better than this with a 45 million price target when it was a concept. Compromises in performance and increases in cost are always part of going from prototype to production. The SU 75 hasn't even reached the prototype stage yet. Russia loves to announce new weapons and brag about capabilities but their stuff rarely proves it's effectiveness in actual combat. The Russian military is only modern if you count ambitious projects as operational weapons. If you look at what they actually uses, it's all good war era stuff.
And now war with Ukraine has left Russia in a situation where they can't even supply munitions for their troops and anything that isnt assault rifles and ammo for same is almost impossible to produce. All that high tech electronics they're claiming will be a feature are now probably out of reach as the west cuts off sales. I rekkon its dead in the water at this point and even if it isnt lets remember the Tu22, a supersonic bomber capable of bombing the USA from bases in Russia which, if propoganda was to be believed, they'd have 800 of by 1960. I mean, it WAS supersonic...
US: F-35 first flight: 2006 F-35s produced: 900 F-22 first flight: 1997 Produced 195 RU: Su-57 first flight: 2010 Su-57 produced: 21 so yeah year after release no signs of the checkmate going anywhere i guess
Small amendment. This aircraft is primarily aimed at selling abroad. For third countries, SU-57 is expensive. Therefore, the manufacturer did not make this commercial project by order from the Ministry of Defense, as usual, but on an initiative basis independently and expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Be specific in the comments.
The U.S has already produced this tech 30 years ago with F22 and F35 and has been operating both while Russia is just getting started. The U.S is already moving on toward Gen 6 fighters.
F-35 неудача сплошная, а насчёт того, кто у кого ещё копирует это надо посмотреть) натырили чертежи в 90х, радуйтесь, что хоть что-то смогли построить, и то не все...
To be fair, russia is also working on the Mikoyan PAK DP which is set to be either a 5++ or 6th generation craft, aiming for a 2025 first test flight, with proper introduction in 2028 and theyve already finalised the design.. (probably wishful thinking with dates but they certainly seem closer to a 6th gen craft than the US.)
Doesn't seem like a lot of exotic technologies. Not including finicky nonsense like making the frame adaptable for multiple configurations, including a VTOL version, can save a lot of time. A standard stealth aircraft body plan by any measure. Even the ruddervators have historically worked with the YF-23, meaning it can be done. Russian stealth has typically been a painted on coating, so less time needed to innovate some kind of stealth material (which they're not promising anyway). I can see them flying in 2023, at the very least meeting the brief of a 'first flight' with a bare bones aircraft with stealth coating.
Stealth paint is a less effective method of reducing a radar signature as opposed to using stealth materials. Both are known to degrade as time passes.
@@michaelkatz275 I remember a f-35 documentary where a spokesman is saying 70% of stealth is the shape of the aircraft so it won't even matter,but I don't know they might decent stealth coating for the su-57 and the su-75 we"ll just have to wait and watch till it's first flight.
@@Globalscanningeyes Yes, in the past that has been true. But now it is less so I understand due to the development of new materials. One of the reasons that the F-35 is limited to Mach 1.6 is that stealth materials have a habit of flying off the aircraft at high Mach numbers.
It does not. It has other wings in different position, another nose. The idea is the same: 1-engine fighter with the smiley face in the front and the pitch-elevators, but the realization is completely different
Unlike the the F 35 , which is not a single engined F22 , Checkmate is more like a single engined SU 57. Which will help reduce development time. And it's very much export oriented.
Air inlet sucks in air great from straight ahead,but amending direction amends flo RATE and that checkmate 75 Chyte..ABSOLUTE GOB CHYTE..Like news saying Putin's regime crumbling,these designs are same media swill for dumbies..
Although similar in appearance, the F-35 is also able to operate as a VTOL aircraft which enables it to operate in areas that are more restrictive than many other aircraft are capable of. We are really comparing apples with oranges here, unless the Checkmate is also capable of hovering as well, then it only resembles the F-35. It would be much more impressive if it was actually an operative aircraft, but since it has not yet made it to the assembly line, it is premature to be touting it’s prowess. Thank you for posting these videos! Please have an excellent and awesome day! ☀️
This is true but only the marine version F35 does the VTOL for use on the smaller carrier/assault ships they use. The B variant. The Navy C and Air Force A models shed that capability to save weight and due to their very different needs and use conventional take off and landing, the C being reinforced for catapulting off carriers. The F35 is a jack of all trades platform. He also mentioned it's an air superiority fighter which it really isn't. The F22 is THE world's greatest air superiority fighter, not the 35. Analogous to the Su-57 class and the F15EX to the Su-35 class in the 4++ category. Navy is gonna be keeping their Hornets for awhile to supplement the 35s.
The fact that it isn't trying to do as much likely will make the "Checkmate" cheaper to make than the F-35 even if it has basically the same abilities as the A Model. Even before considering that there may be less costs of the greedy/corruption type involved, and that they likely have been able to skip on some development due to using the existing F-35's shape as a starting point to work with. Not sure why there are so many comments assuming that Russia cannot actually afford to develop something at least comparable to the F-35, while just being a one-size-fits-all non-S/VTOL fighter. Look, nothing against the F-35, the things are pretty amazing, but being the first guy to make something (especially if you jam it full of so many brand new features and have multiple variants) will generally make it more costly then being the second guy to make something.
@@КонстантинБобриков-л5ц Really? The YAK-141 is a copy of the Convair Model 200A, down to the P&W designed and patented three bearing swivel nozzle, and the single stage front lift double engines. The SU-75 is a copy of the Northrop MRF-54E (1991-1993). Russia can do nothing but copy, because your gene pool is a sewage pit after the Bolshevik Revolution and WWII.
This concept is in no way shape or form a threat to F-35 sales. By the time this thing comes online, the F-35 will be operational for some 20 years and receive it's first MLU updates and will e a proven platform. FurthermoreRussian and American fighter platforms don't compete in the same markets (with a few exceptions). the next problem for this Russian concept will be china, since China already surpassed Russia in almost every field of combat aircraft technology and 15 years from now russia will not be able to keep pace with Chinese technology anymore.
@Jasper Percabeth In 15 years Russia will be the lapdog of China following whatever China dictates. There will be no working together, Russia will ne happy if they will be allowed to WORK FOR China. Russian technology is so far behind thst it does matter very little today and will be no relevant in 15 years. China is the next contender to be the West‘s main foe but still stands little chance.
The United States Air Force is so much further advanced than anything Russia has. One advanced F-16 could take out multiple Russion aircraft and they wouldn't even see it coming.
@@MT-rg4fn Put our F-16's in there with our pilots and our Air commanders and you will see the F-16 as anything but a disappointment. You will think it is the greatest aircraft ever made. First like we always do we will take out any possible way of yall being able to detect it on radar. But all that will probably start a new war.
Visually it looks like a stretched Boeing F-32 , the plane that everyone laughed at . Cockpit , intake , wings, tails ..............................................this is beautiful , hope they build it ..💛💙
I’m seeing two elements from the joint strike fighter program and both of them are coming from the Boeing X 32. The engine intake is similar to the X 32 and it has a Pelikan tail.
The name of the fighter aircraft is "Checkmate". The word "Checkmate" originates from Persian "Shah Mat" meaning "King is helpless" and the game of Chess itself originated in India...So, judging by the name the main market for this aircraft will be India and Iran.
Well, same was once said for many of the already existing Russia's modern weapons and military equipment, mostly just by some trolls and not real experts. Chances are high to see Su-75 first test flight next year already.
What I seem to notice about the eastern block is that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation has really good designs and concepts for military equipment, but lack funding and proper engineering know-how to successfully make them function as they were internet
I believe the the Soviet design bureaus were always interested in the F-16 design and there is no reason why they would not still be in today’s Russia!
It’s not all about hand designed to copy. Soviet used the same hydroplaning software in the wind tunnel computer Aid to help designing itself that all looking similar. Soviets had many formerly Nazi German designers. The USA is not a Superman.
Video title: "America is scared of this new Russian fighter" Me: "Get your binoculars, and head to the comments, kids! We're going Triggered 'Murican spotting!"
If you're going to compare it to the F35 you need to compare it to the A model. If you want to use it on carriers the F35B&C models are your only options.
they almost decided to ressurrect the canadian avro arrow and give it some upgrades instead of choosing the f-35, even after 60 years a few upgrades and modern avionics and the avro arrow could easily contend with fifth generation fighters for a fraction of the cost, but uncle sam doesnt like competition, they always pressured foreign countries to not invest or buy from canada and they helped scrap the cl-84 which was canadas vtol craft that the osprey was based on decades later and they also pressured diefenbaker to scrap the avro arrow program which spelled the end for canadas aerospace industry, at that time canada was a world leader and had the worlds 4th largest airforce, were the 3rd country to launch a sattelite into space and after the avro arrow program was scrapped and 17,500 people were left jobless the best of the industry moved to the US and joined NASA and were instrumental in the success of the space program and the moon landing.
Can't be afraid of something that isn't even built. The F-35 is war tested and dangerous. There is also a huge difference in training between Russian and American pilots with American pilots get almost double flying hours than their Russian counter parts.
I think it is warranted to point out that "Checkmate" is the Russian designation for it - the Western designation for a fighter jet would have to begin with "F", like the "Fulcrum" or "Flanker". Therefore, a more appropriate name would be the NAFO designation of Su-75 "Femboy".
That is why the United States is using the discovery of the Russian physicist Peter Ufimtsev to build its "stealth", and Ufimtsev himself was invited as a consultant to build its "stealth bomber" B2. LOL!
@@a1marine105 Yes, it looks like the German "Horten Ho IX". But before the invention of Ufimtsev, it was impossible to make calculations of the parameters in advance. Even the Germans did not do "stealth", this effect was discovered by accident during testing. And only thanks to Ufimtsev it became possible to calculate the shape and materials of the aircraft in projects without "trial and error".
The weak point of Su-75 is that it is a cardboard mockup at this time:) Similar mockups were shown by the Turks(TF-X) and Brits(BAE Tempest) man years ago. South Korea even shown something resembling something close to the actual prototype (KF-X). Whether there is any real possibility of any of these mockups will fly is a matter for speculation. In any case- calling 'Su75' an 'aircraft' or a "prototype" is the extreme stretch of imagination:) the "Su-75" is bets decribed as a "funding drive for a development to produce a prototype that might generate some interest from buyers.... hopefully....potentioally"
A plane is so powerful on paper or on video but in actual combat scenario it's a different ball game because you have enemy to fight to that's not a video game but actual game of death! I'm not saying that Russian jet fighter are inferior to that of the west because they are just capable as the west planes are. What I'm saying is it depends on the pilot capabilities and common sense in the battlefield.
America fighters are not always the best that you expected from the World War Two and mini gulf war . America lost 9,000 planes to Russian Mig fighters in Vietnam. One of John Mc Cain got shot down heroless British pilots are better than the America pilots. Russians are supremacy flight fighters now, Than the powerful formidable Soviet time.
@@Mikhelinx Americans never went below a 2:1 kill ratio in Vietnam. The worst example of American aircraft performance you can find and it’s still 2:1.
@@fatstacksfatlips8708 yeah all American planes sit in a boneyard uselessness. Russia Checkmate capability shoot down six America fighters at once time. Many German engineering and science moved to Moscow.
@@fatstacksfatlips8708 plus Russians have a new anti-aircraft S-500 that can shoot down the imperialism planes within 500 miles radius. The Americans planes will be shot down by S-500 superior Missile within a few couple miles after take off from the airstrip either sea or land. I proud of my Russians
Yeah unless they make a completely radiacally different design its a copy according to people like you. Unless it has 3 engines and reverse wings its a copy.
@@ilyavolkov2556 You never know. I have no doubt every single US military contractor would kill entire orphanages to sell an exceedingly overpriced and barely working stealth pizza box - like the B-2.
Russia claims a bunch of crap about their capabilities, see how their systems are doing in Ukraine. The Su-57 is barely low fourth gen RCS but they developed AI for this thing? Seems like a lot of marketing.
After being completely stuffed by a Junta and some "politicians" I'm surprised you are doing as well as you are. It's like you succeed despite your government. Same as here really.
Bruh momento El país está a punto de gastar 600 millones (verdes, obviamente) o bien en los JF17 Block III o en los MiG-35 porque la FFAA está literalmente en bolas desde el retiro de los Mirage y el ya cercano retiro de los A-4. Y quieren que Rusia ponga instalaciones de mantenimiento en el país poniendo de excusa que "si adquieren los MiG el mantenimiento y la logística será un problema". A mí me suena a que de paso están allanando el terreno para adquirir estos bichos sin problema en el futuro, que dicho sea de paso si esos son los números finales serían hasta más baratos que los MiG increíblemente...
For one youre comparing a pretty much brand new plane to one that really only started to enter service in 2005, it this thing really does counter the F-35 and 22 Im willing to bet we have the tech to put into a new plane and beat it
@@Attaxalotl let's not forget the Russians keep misrepresenting the F-35 as an air superiority fighter and not its proper designation which is a multirole fighter. For some reason they specifically keep using the B model but never the A or C model.
Judging by looks alone, the SU-75 looks almost like a MiG-21 mixed with an F-35 and made stealth. So, I mean... Why not make a stealth MiG-21 with upgraded avionics and an improved engine? It would make an excellent low-cost interceptor and light strike fighter.
Stealth requires a lot more than putting some RAM and internal weapons bays on an airframe and calling it a day, Boeing discovered that the hard way when they tried making the F-15 stealth for their Silent Eagle prototype and it barely made a difference in its RCS. The entire airframe has to have stealth characteristics, and the Mig-21 clearly doesn't fit the bill. This prototype doesn't look like it will be much of a match for Western 5th gen aircraft but if it does actually get built it will be way better than a "stealthy" Mig-21, that's for sure
@@yomama629 stealth is also a lot harder these days due to all the electronic noise.(cell towers, wifi, civilian radio and radar, ect). The IR satalites can also see the heat from engines and air friction.
"Just upgrade a platform from the 60's!" Is such a normie take on military development. It betrays a complete incapacity to understand the design concepts being discussed.
In December '22 the USAF paired a modified F-16D with an AI pilot and had it fly around completely unmanned. (Ok, it wasn't entirely free, there was a second F-16 that was manned and the AI was basically acting as his wingman; still pretty impressive though.) The main issue with remotely controlled planes is input lag: from the time it takes for the drone to spot a threat to relay it to the controller, and then for the drone to get a command from the controller and respond to said threat, can be a delay of 2-3 seconds. Doesn't sound that long, but when you're dogfighting or defending against missile those lost seconds can make all the difference.
Special thanks to Ridge Wallet for jumping in to sponsor today's video. Gotta say, at first I didn't know what to expect but I was sold with just how compact the wallet is. if your in the market, they are best at what they do - get the titanium one cause its just so cool. ridge.com/FNE
First reply :D
Making any video about Forward Sept wings?
This is fake there is only 1 working model, the other crashed when being delivered. As I now there is no worries
There is only 1 working right now, the second crashed when the attempted to deliver it.
Dude, please learn to pronounce Sukhoi correctly....FFS
Also your "unguided rockets" are flares. lol
Russia (as well as other vast countries) uses twin-engine fighter jets, as they have to cover long distances and -in case of emergency- the nearest airfield could be far away. Most other countries, though, prefer single-engine jet fighter, so the russians create a single-engine version of their own jets. It's an export-oriented plane, not a backbone of russian forces or something.
Pakistan
They have not dominated for only one century , whenever / wherever , in the long run/historically dominant ,as one civilization disappeared they rise with a new stronger , hence supremacy.
ur absoletely wright
Всё проще мой друг, дело в том что тяговооружённость у совковых двигателей низкая, по этому используют спаренные двигатели.😘 Два двигателя это не плюс, а всегда минус.
@@constantinemalkovich9089 Откуда ты такой не совковый взялся? Два двигателя Су-57 могут выдавать максимальную тягу на форсаже 38 тонн в секунду, тогда как у F-22 только около 32 тонн в секунду.
The animation is reaching Mustard levels of quality
Mustard but upload frequently
I am really curious to know which software its used to create such delicious models , do u by chance know which platform mustard uses ???
@@nebunezz_r not as high quality
@@hchand02 I thinks it's Blender. He told about it once =)
@@fridaycaliforniaa236 thanks 🙏😊
It's made for export. The official trailer for it has pilots from all major non-Western markets being called to witness it.
Its not made, not yet. This is just a sales pitch.
India is not buying ngl
It’s going to be trash. I mean fine for selling around the world but won’t beat F35 or older F22 raptor. Or f16 or f15 for that matter.
@@danielvandermerwe7921 agree russsia dosent have enough cpiital to devlop
@@danielvandermerwe7921 insane agenda 🤣 overrated us
The SU-75 is a ghost of a fighter, literally! Nobody’s ever seen it for real!
propagranda, talk only no real fact
@@ttkh68thomas43 Fun fact 75 in Su-75 is the amount of years it will take to make one
Я вам больше скажу все знают о су 57 но мало кто знает про як 132 самый засекречиный самолёт РФ
because is a ghost, and Ghost don't exist. Try to fly one, see what happens.
The United States cannot take down a squadron of the Checkmate or the Felon, because neither have the numbers for a squadron.
I think Russian jets look cooler, because of colour choice
Russian jet colors are mostly localized, though they've been trying a similar simple two-tone color on some of their 35 (both Flanker & Fulcrum).
America has a lot of customers on all hemispheres, so they opt to have the simple grey paint that should blend in most skies.
The black bird looks the best
Same
I also love how they blend curves into angles.
But SU75 looks shit,I like SU57 more
The extraordinary claims regarding price, range, combat capabilities, delivery targets, etc.: I'll believe it when I see it
If only the US followed that advice when they funded the F-35
@@Shrew_King It's just an onboard Alexa lol.
it all depends on sales so tbh i believe russian can do it
@@Shrew_King They mention many buzzwords. ;o)
Not necessarily a dig at Russia, I'd be sceptical of anyone making such extraordinary claims
I just get the feeling that this is a modern, single seat, single engine multi role fighter bomber intended to be sold to Russia's Allies and Countries that operate Russian aircraft to replace old end of life Mig-21's, Mig-23's, mig-27's, and Su-22's.
Yeah, only UAE ins't known as Russian ally and operator of Migs and Su
The MIg-21 will never be end of life!
Srbijaaaaa👋
Good option for India to buy these planes in future to replace Old depleting Fighter jets like Mig 21 n Jaguars. 😎👍👏👏👌
you mean iran exactly
this plane is so stealthy no one has ever seen it and no one ever will
funniest american
My guy the plane is sill in the testing face the first prototype will be made in 2024 to 2025.
@@verdorrenstudios no it won't hahahahhahaha not with all these sanctions. Russia can't make its own complex electronics and absolutely cannot match the west in precision and electronics. Have you seen the Su-57? Unshielded compressor blades, fucking exposed screws and indents on the wings. No shot is that a stealth fighter
why yall taking this man so seriously
@@hospital3568 Cause there saying that not even a model of the plane would even be made.
Su-75 is an aircraft that surpasses other current 5th gen stealth category fighters by a wide margin: not only its stealth, it even does not exist!!;)
It does exist but its still in prototype up for display it wont be released until 2023
@@NotLRK its not a prototype. Its cardboard mockup
@@NotLRK Sure buddy. The onboard computer will probably run on Windows Vista.
I just made a aircraft to surpass it. It's called the Gfjsye-2548362819643 but no one can see it, top secret
why do americans hate russia so much..? I dont care who is better, this plane is beautiful and I think it will eventually make it to the skies. instead of hating let's try to compete and make better machines, if history thought us something, the most powerful nations always fall while in denial of not being the best anymore.
One important thing to consider is by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production, the NGAD 6th gen will be as well. Personally, I do not see that as a "Checkmate".
That's assuming that the Su-75 ever even makes it out of the design stage, let alone prototyping / testing.
The NATO reporting name for this thing should be the Su-75 Fantasy, or Su-75 Fictional.
by the time the SU-75 is ready for full production US might not even exist anymore
it's a checkmate alright. Just not from the Russian perspective.
it's like saying my imaginary plane is better than yours. i yesterday imagined a plane invisible to missiles
If Russia is selling this plane to it's trading partners, it's not that much of a threat to the US.
You can say this for the F35 too, But the export models of weapons are always second best, no one sells their best everyone expects this, but whatever we only know what They want us to know more likely what their adversary knows n zero more
Just a way to make money, not a threat.
We should have sold the USSR millions of first generation Ford Pintos.
The Cold War could've ended 15 years earlier!
The f35 was made to fill requirements by the us military and serve as an export platform for their allies. As far as I know, the Russian military didn’t ask for this and may not ever buy it. This is made entirely by the company with intention to export. In some regard it is competition as export products but in reality the customers would be different. US and Russia tend to sell to different countries.
South America, Africa, the Middle East and Asia excluding Japan and maybe South Korea. Sounds like a big enough market.
It's so stealthy that not even the Russian test pilots have ever seen it fly. It perfectly compliments the new Ilyushin super sonic cargo plane that can carry four tanks, and the clear plastic drones that were purpose built to hunt F-35s.
typical Americans who can't see their opponents do well, whats up with the lousy defense systems of America that can not compare with that of the Russians
It is the Russian approach to stealth
The Su-57 also has the same approach, but because it is less stealthy it can be seen flying (very rare but sometimes happens)
calling the Su-57 even some what stealth is a reach, with no RAM (Radar Absorbant Material) and exposed bolts on the wing pannels. Yeah it's an approach but even their stealth fighter can't be made in quantity or even with good quality. let alone the fact that it's radar cross section would be embarrassing to miss.
@@silver_css3734 It has the RCS of a clean F/A-18 Super Hornet; so about ~1m²
At best, is a low observable 4.5 generation fighter, or a very bad 5th generation fighter
The thing doesn't even have functional missile bays... functional for a (theatrically) 5th generation fighter (It is basically the same as a WW2 bomber, not pressurized), so asking it to be as stealthy as any other modern aircraft is kind of asking for too much
Sarsasm...😂
"Can be flown by A.I." Alright, someone get the ace combat protagonists, we gonna need them
nice
i remember that there is a film where a new prototype of plane that was controled by an AI(american) was added to a squad and started to fly by himself
@@philippey4918 It was called Stealth, its kinda meh, but it did have some nice cgi dogfight scenes for the time
Russia cant even get spare part to their computers
@@ulrichkristensen4087 ROFL neither can anyone else. VID 0ne nein really messed thing up globally. Supplies are kinda meh even in the US.
The F35 isn't a superiority fight, but a multirole fight.
it shows how shitty your aircraft is when you have to compare a superiority fighter to a strike aircraft 😂
Also a good submarine
@@KD-wl3fk 😂😂😂 you guys are funny. Interesting seeing western equipment getting shredded and blown to bits right now. I guess you guys aren't so tough after all.
@@zerosteel0123 Which F-35 did you see blown to bits today?
@@henrychu495 If US dare to send their f35s to ukraine. Then sure you'll see them blow to bits.
Btw US technology is soo advanced that one f35 was swimming near South China Sea. 😂😂
The comment section of this video will be...interesting.
*Throws popcorn in the microwave*
The entire section is going to be "'Murica YeeHaw!!".
This is where the fun begins🤣✌
Take a look at the America and Russia fanboys arguing.
Throws a ridge wallet to the popcorn. "Not on my watch, comrade". LOL
FACT
All very impressive, but the SA-32 Thunderbolt Starfury is capable of reaching orbit and operating as a space superiority fighter, as well as being armed with four advanced plasma pulse cannons and has hardpoints for up to ten additional weapons. It's also every bit as real as the SU-75.
It will also fire the “SuperZircon” missile, which flies at roughly light speed and has a KyberCrystal warhead, which can destroy a whole planet. Ask the citizens of Alderaan how real this weapon is…
@@mandoreforger6999😂😂😂
Strictly speaking the SA-32 "Thunderbolt" is a transatmospheric air and space superiority fighter capable of force projection as far as jump gates are available due to its only limitation being a lack of jumpdrive.
@@stephenkolostyak4087 haven't heard of the MiG 41 yet, eh?
Which sci fi movie was that in?
In Russia you don’t play chess with chess pieces
*You play with fighter jets*
With fighter jets that exist only as anímations!
@@tombrunila2695 And, this video is ruined.
@@tombrunila2695 the truth
@@tombrunila2695 damn people really hate russian developments, yet they hype the american FA-XX so much (which even the animation itself doesnt exist yet) lmao. cant you just take the joke without having to despise russia?
@@773-o2n, the only stuff that is being hyped is Soviet/Russia weapons! They are all supposed to be vastly superior, but when the shooting starts they prove to have been expensive targets! And then comes the claim that the Soviet Union or Russia had delivered substandard "export" versions of the weapons to their most important clients! NEVER is there even a hint of that before the shooting starts. Before the claim is that these super weapons will make mince meat out of Western weapons!
And this "new" Russian fighter is a copy of what Northrop had developed nearly 30th years ago!
I seem to recall a certain saying- ‘believe nothing you hear and only half of what you see’
It’s not like they’d admit to being behind.
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the Poseidon nuclear torpedo. Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
@@SmotritelMayaka29 I wonder if the horror is more to the point than the actual functionality, though
@@SmotritelMayaka29 A nuclear torpedo is not big deal to develop, a fifth gen fighter in the other hand...
IF IT FLIES within 5 years, they are ahead of the F-35. At least from a technological perspective, as they use tech of today, not from 20 years ago. Again: IF IT FLIES.
@@Gunni1972 But Russian tech is like 15-20 years behind!
I'm sure this thing will be as highly successful as the T-14 Armata main battle tank...
They've produced like 10 of them in 10 years.
lol I have a feeling you are correct.
Wow funny come up with something new kid.
@@Darkpara1source? It's top secret info for the Russian defence circles so you as an arrogant teen have no hope of knowing them yet
This comment didn't age well. How are those leopard tanks and Bradley's doing now? 😂😂😂
as the missle said, the 75 in the su-75 is the amount of years it will take for Sukhoi to make a proper stealth fighter.
Hollywood is taking its toll on you my friend
and even tho the 75 is suppossed to be stealth it still uses the IRS dome... which is literally a fucking lighthouse on a radar... meaning its stealth capability is shit... and it doesnt even exist...
@@badi95toinfinity wow wow look whos talking, filled with russian propagannda. Here's a fact, Russia's military is in such a bad state that even though its the second strongest army it cant even defeat ukraine
@@badi95toinfinity also your ass fails to realize that su 57, the apparent russian 5th gen aircraft only has 21 aircraft, and only 11 of those are in service and it took over 40 years for it to enter service, developed 1975, in service 2020 . Whilst the f-35 started development in 1995 and first entered service in 2015, thats 25 full years faster than the su 57 annd it already has over 1000 aircraft in service. So your dumbass needs to wake up and understand that without other buyers russia does not have the capabilities or the requried technology that can rival the US's
India backed out of a potential deal with the SU57, due to technical failures and engine malfunctions. Not what was promised to them.. since no one is lining up to purchase the 57 its program is a failure.. checkmate my a** 😂
I'll start thinking about being worried about the "Checkmate" when it actually flies.
Twenty years from now.....
For now its just a 10-move setup...
When it flies, Covid-19 probably wiped out human being
Lockheed Martin working on the FR-72.
This is what was said in 2015 when Putin spoke about the "Poseidon nuclear torpedo"(Status-6). Now the former skeptics are looking at the working torpedo in horror.
For the record, that weapons diagram was for the F-18, not the F-16.
Interesting aircraft. In theory, it has very good specs. We’ll see how it all eventuates over coming years of testing.
Russia can't afford this project
@Tylon Holmes lol i love the derailing topic. this isn't about healthcare, Russian healthcare is awful too but unlike russia us can afford 800+ jets without its economy collapsing,
@@tophatv2902 Естественно при таких бюджетах они очень хотят воевать(я про США), и Россия при бюджете в несколько раз меньше всё равно обходит США в некоторых структурах. При таких бюджетах, которые США выделяет на армию в год можно было бы уже медицину бесплатной сделать. Но нет, США будет говорить о том, что им нужна мощная армия на триллионы долларов. Я очень люблю, когда сравнивают Страны по количеству танков самолётов и т.п. Ну много у вас самолётов, молодцы. Системам ПВО России хотяб разогреться дадите.
@@Blackholee-kc4op those air defeenses are gettting rekt by some dudes with bayraktars
@@vignasimp2835 c400 or c500 or 550 ? no
Given current events I'd be shocked if this jet ever flies
Про Авангард Пересвет насколько я помню говорили мультики Путина сейчас не смешно
WhAT events?
It looks like they combined features that the suits and stockholders in the military opted out of (YF-23 and X-32/F-32). Will be interesting to see what it's capable of.
Yes that's what I thought
russia found another way to copy homework but not be like china
It’ll be capable of collecting dust seeing as it’s made of wood 💀
@@DiamondSquidy I'm sure it also burns well if they store the wooden mockup indoors
@@ambassadorofreee3859 yeah the only modern jet that’s a cigaret butt away from being deleted from history 😭
“AFRAID” is the perfect choice word for clickbait but that’s about it.
From the end of the video, it seemed like he was talking about defense contractors being afraid it would take sales away from the f35, which seems reasonable if it is developed quickly and at near the proposed price.
Scared for a virtual jet....hihihi
Su 57 only 12 units and 2 crash so only 10 now
Su 75 ?
J 20 has 150 units so far
J 31 only 5 units so far
F 35 has 500 units worldwide so far ...
You decide....kkkk
@@johnathanclayton2887 30 million dollars is impossible for russia becouse its the same price as j 10 from china
Su 75 is like 70 million dollars for reality check not a virtual one....
Su 35 is 65 million to 85 million dollars to buy so a new jet is not 30 million dollars its ridiculous....
I seriously doubt the US is Afraid of the SU75 sounds like a click bait title to me.
Normal when you are RUclipsr ...that's paid advert
You are free to think whatever your doubt doesn't change anything 😜
At USD40 million a piece it just worth it
@@DSM85986 we're really not scared of an imaginary jet
@@Just_A_Random_Desk to me been on your bed for sure you are not but those who will really face it does your response is equally as of my grandmother
Russia: This new plane will change everything. We will dominate the skies.
Also Russia: We can only afford to make one… out of wood.
The practice of the war in Syria, Georgia and Ukraine has shown that the bastards escape even from wooden Russian planes.
And dry wall screw's :)
@@MrTaramkaya don't forget america lost against fucking farmers in Vietnam and they did not do shit in Korea and they lost in Afghanistan plus ukraine for Russia is going well they are already destroying Abrams and many other nato tanks.
It's pretty similar to the Boeing X-32B, just less stealthy and I remember when Russia said that the TU-144 was better than the Concorde
It is
@@eliasziad7864 except the Concorde was much more reliable than the TU-144, the Concorde could supercruise at Mach 2 while the Tupolev couldn't, the passenger cabin in the Concorde was as quiet as a normal airliner while the TU-144's was so noisy that passengers had to pass notes to each other, The Concorde had a brilliant safety record apart from a crash that was caused by tire debris from another aircraft while the TU-144 had 226 failures during 102 flights. The only thing the Tupolev beat the Concorde at was speed
Fake Russia military is outdated and old
@@josephmana8972 Same for US army...
@@eliasziad7864your third world country can't even compete against us y'all weak and poor and outdated
History is replete with high-flown concept planes that under-delivered...or, by the time the kinks in the system were worked out, their "cutting edge" technology was already obsolete.
So, I'll worry about the Checkmate when it actually moves beyond 'flying prototype' and into actual production. Until then, it's a paper tiger.
Yeah, NATO outmatches Russia and the CSTO in every way.
Same thing happened with the foxbat, they hyped it up so the USA made f-15 just for the foxbat to be a price of trash
Kita bukti kn mlm ini
@AllTradesGeorge
The checkmate isn't exactly "cutting edge" at this point.
Not even for Russia.
It's more like playing catchup with America, at least insofar as their military purpose aircraft exports are concerned.
@@jonblack3807 Wishful thinking
Finally Sukhoi provided data about how the new Su 75 can easily destroy an F-35... A Tu 95 loaded with all blueprints and promises of this marvellous plane should have to fly above an airport where there is at least an F-35 landed in the middle of the parking range, very visible. Then the Tupolev -95 would make a landing crash on the F-35...
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
knowing f35 it is more likely to crash into another f35 due to another vtol malfunction on an aircraft carrier
It's August 2023 now. But still no records of a Test Flight for the Su-75 Checkmate...
February 2024 (or January 31st for some people)
Where checkmate test flight?
the worst thing is that im not even surprised, i quickly realized why people call the su75 fe_boy
No offence, but some bragging the air superiority out of the US with RUS, I immediately thought of Vietnamese using 2 outdated subsonic Mig-17s vs F-4s or F-105s. Migs were always outnumbered by the US in 1:12 ratio , but managed to do so much damage to the US. You can have all the funny gadgets and AI, but pilots are pilots.
Shhh ….. , nobody who watches History Channel knows that….. 😏
Same as Israel six-day war, Israel also outnumbered by the arabs, it is about the pilots
pretty sure its about how you treat your enemies. ive seen many americans underestimating their opponents
@Brian Roome either way the soviet tech indeed did many damage to the us back then (?)
@Brian Roome 1:12 number ratio, 2:1 kill ratio means 1:6 of actual K/D rate, dude. Take some maths. Or in this case, can't swallow the truth against White Supremacist about "the US is invicible" arrogance, you could say.
F-35 doesn’t have the highest thrust-to-weight ratio, but its engine sure as hell does. If they can’t beat that, they’ll just have a cool-looking fighter that still needs to hang stores externally.
On empty weight, F-35A Block 3F's T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50/52's. F-35A has an active engine upgrade program.
The F35 is actually underpowered they have a newer engine in development.
@@graham1996 false, For empty weight, F-35A T/W ratio is similar to F-16C Block 50's. You haven't normalised the range between the two aircraft design.
@@graham1996
The basic wing loading without body and vortex lift.
F-35A
Empty weight: 29,300 lb
Wing area: 460 ft²
Wing loading: 63.04 lbs/ sq feet.
F-16C Block 52
Wing area: 300 ft²
Empty weight: 18,900 lb
Wing loading: 63 lbs/ sq feet.
F-35A's empty weight is 1.54X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's wing area is 1.53X scaled from F-16C.
F-35A's 43,000 lbf thrust is 1.50X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. There's a reason for the engine upgrade program.
F-35A's 45,000 lbf thrust upgrade road map is 1.57X scaled from F-16C's 28,600 lbf. F-35A needs at least 44,330 lbs thrust to preserve 1.55X scale factor
There's a near straight 1.5X scaling between F16C to F-35A on basic wing loading, engine thrust, and empty weight.
F-35A's wing area is influenced by weight growth and F-16C's empty weight wing loading target.
They are working to improve the F135 with 11% more range 10% more thurst and 50% better thermal management. To my knowledge though GE and RR are working on a next gen engine to possibility repower the F35 and 6 gen aircraft.
"But at 21st century, arm race continues at full speed ahead between the US and the Russian federation..."
China: Am I a joke to you?
welll condisdering on how many "license built" and copy paste they had they probably would have been probably DNF
Hmm nah.. It was just a cold war parallel and China wasn't part of it, so...
Chinese tech is all stolen from the US and Russia
@@zeplyn-r6 Can't agree with you more lmao
Just want to ponit out China is making way more copypasted American weapons than Russia these days
yes china is a joke
"The 75 in the name is the amount of years Sukhoi will need to make an actual stealth fighter, because they clearly don't know how to make one after the failure of the Su57. I see you over there, don't try and sneak up on me." - Tym3 Glitch
It doesnt look ANYTHING like the F-35. It looks similar to the SU-57, which is the point as it's sharing a lot of tech/design from that platform which keeps its cost low.
It’s like a thinner X-32
Russia has a couple of operational SU-57's. Now their economy is "Check mate", so this design is a paper tiger sales pitch.
@@la7dfa the russian economy now is at its peak high because of gas and oil prices, i wonder where you get your information from
@@amir021idm you mean zhe oil and gas nobody is buying from them
@@lennymegakill9580 when i buy things from the store i can afford whatever i want that’s what important for me, unlike other countries
Hi, really like your video as usual. But I have noticed one little mistake. MAKS is not an annual airshow. It is organized every two years. Greetings from Russia :)
I hope Su75 it sells like Mig21
@@shimadwan8251 if you havent realized. The Su-75 is technically a stealth Mig-21
@@flogger8413 lol i sure hope it's not any way like a MiG-21 those things drop like flies
The Checkmate looks like if you combined the XF-23 and the XF-32
and look at the cockpit of YF-23 and on the wings of YF-22 and compare this to su-57, its simular right? maybe the only original things of su-57 are engines
@@michalc1018 No! They‘ve stolen the engines from Star Wars or from some other Hollywood shit. I think the Russians have also stolen the english language but they reproduced it to cyrilic, that‘s why we don‘t understand it anymore. However, the first thing they‘ve stolen from the US was the Idea of people having a need to breath to stay alive. (Sarcasm)
@@michalc1018 wait what- are you trying to say Su-57 is a copy of...........what the fu- nope not at all doesn't look simular at all
@@BlackPhantom_II Even IF, it couldn't be a "copy". More like a Mash-up, and if someone could pull that off, Congratulations. You solved the "what if"-problem, in Aircraft construction.
YF?
Chess is a 2d game. Checkmate is created on a 2d chess game. Similarly, the 75 will probably stay on a 2d surface without ever flying.
Bruh XD
Little correction.. the MAKS Airshow is not every year, it is all two years.
The air inlet reminds me of the American x-32 when they tried air-2-air refueling the refueling thing headed for the massive air intake on the x-32, which was a little bit concerning for the pilot.
It just wanted to take a big sip
Several problems I can see plaguing this aircraft.
IF, and it’s a big if, Russia can pull this off at a $30 million price point, AND meet all of its specifications it claims it can achieve, it will be beyond impressive, considering they have yet to do it with the Su-57, of which only 14 have been built to date (which only have 2 units that are combat-ready, 12 used for training craft), and they have struggled to build even those numbers. Mind you, this hasn’t even flown yet. No flight testing has occurred. They are years away from mass producing this fighter, and it may not even see flight before the advent of sixth-generation fighter jets, which China, the UK, France, and the US are already developing (the US already announcing they have test flown a sixth-gen prototype). It may be outdated before it even leaves the ground. I would be very surprised if it can meet the $30 million price point without making significant sacrifices in capability, or Russia pressing forward, and omitting certain technologies initially promised to bring down the cost. Like I said, they haven’t been able to do it with the Su-57 yet, which is likely going to sell closer to $70 million/unit, up from the $50 million price point initially advertised.
That said, if this is what Russia claims it to be, and they can field it in comparable numbers to rival the F-35, which has over 700 produced as of November 2021, and over a half-dozen buyers, it could be a beast, and a formidable rival. But I’ll believe it when I see it… If I see it. As I said earlier, we’re still waiting on the Su-57, which still has no foreign buyers. And with no foreign buyers, neither program will be a serious rival to the F-22/F-35, or even the J-20.
I'm more worried about what China has, rather than Russia.
The F 35 was better than this with a 45 million price target when it was a concept. Compromises in performance and increases in cost are always part of going from prototype to production. The SU 75 hasn't even reached the prototype stage yet.
Russia loves to announce new weapons and brag about capabilities but their stuff rarely proves it's effectiveness in actual combat. The Russian military is only modern if you count ambitious projects as operational weapons. If you look at what they actually uses, it's all good war era stuff.
And now war with Ukraine has left Russia in a situation where they can't even supply munitions for their troops and anything that isnt assault rifles and ammo for same is almost impossible to produce. All that high tech electronics they're claiming will be a feature are now probably out of reach as the west cuts off sales. I rekkon its dead in the water at this point and even if it isnt lets remember the Tu22, a supersonic bomber capable of bombing the USA from bases in Russia which, if propoganda was to be believed, they'd have 800 of by 1960. I mean, it WAS supersonic...
My thoughts exactly, how is a new entry in the Sukhoi line something to think about when the last one has barely made its mark
Agree. Looks great on paper. Let’s see if it actually makes it past a blueprint. The SU-57 project is going sooo well for them. Lol !!
US: F-35 first flight: 2006 F-35s produced: 900
F-22 first flight: 1997 Produced 195
RU: Su-57 first flight: 2010 Su-57 produced: 21
so yeah year after release no signs of the checkmate going anywhere i guess
Small amendment. This aircraft is primarily aimed at selling abroad. For third countries, SU-57 is expensive. Therefore, the manufacturer did not make this commercial project by order from the Ministry of Defense, as usual, but on an initiative basis independently and expressed the hope that the Russian armed forces would also show interest in this aircraft. Be specific in the comments.
The last Stealth airframe Russia built was th SU-57 they had one count it one partner: India. India pulled out and is now buy French Mirage.
India cancelled their Su 57s because they thought they were scrap
In the Checkmates glossy ad they used an image of a RAF 617 Squadron F-35 patch, someone in Russia didn't do their research properly 🤣🤣
The U.S has already produced this tech 30 years ago with F22 and F35 and has been operating both while Russia is just getting started. The U.S is already moving on toward Gen 6 fighters.
I hope our new fighter program produces something dope. I saw the design they unveiled. It looks awesome
F-35 неудача сплошная, а насчёт того, кто у кого ещё копирует это надо посмотреть) натырили чертежи в 90х, радуйтесь, что хоть что-то смогли построить, и то не все...
Technically 40, the F-117 first flew in 1981.
It isn't intended for the same market. China will be their main competition.
To be fair, russia is also working on the Mikoyan PAK DP which is set to be either a 5++ or 6th generation craft, aiming for a 2025 first test flight, with proper introduction in 2028 and theyve already finalised the design.. (probably wishful thinking with dates but they certainly seem closer to a 6th gen craft than the US.)
bro the su 75 is litterally a wooden mockup and the f35 is the most advanced aircraft to this day
I also drew a pretty impressive plane, I also wrote down some bad-ass specs. I call it the "draw-4".
But you don't have history of building real planes.
)))
@@_Epsilon_ hey neither does the person who made this….. thing.
Doesn't seem like a lot of exotic technologies. Not including finicky nonsense like making the frame adaptable for multiple configurations, including a VTOL version, can save a lot of time. A standard stealth aircraft body plan by any measure. Even the ruddervators have historically worked with the YF-23, meaning it can be done. Russian stealth has typically been a painted on coating, so less time needed to innovate some kind of stealth material (which they're not promising anyway).
I can see them flying in 2023, at the very least meeting the brief of a 'first flight' with a bare bones aircraft with stealth coating.
Anything can fly by 2023.
2023? I'd give it more time than that. But definitely simplicity is their selling factor if the price is appropriately low as well
Stealth paint is a less effective method of reducing a radar signature as opposed to using stealth materials. Both are known to degrade as time passes.
@@michaelkatz275 I remember a f-35 documentary where a spokesman is saying 70% of stealth is the shape of the aircraft so it won't even matter,but I don't know they might decent stealth coating for the su-57 and the su-75 we"ll just have to wait and watch till it's first flight.
@@Globalscanningeyes Yes, in the past that has been true. But now it is less so I understand due to the development of new materials. One of the reasons that the F-35 is limited to Mach 1.6 is that stealth materials have a habit of flying off the aircraft at high Mach numbers.
It looks pretty much PRECISELY like a 50/50 mix of Lockheed Martin and Boeing Prototypes. Pretty cool!
The hawker tempest that will come out in 2032 as the new eurofighter looks a lot like the f22 raptor
Checkmate is a PRO level marketing move. Love it.
Not really. Very amateurish.
. Hostile Pilot
>
Just like all the Russian Pros working in brothels worldwide.
It looks a lot like the YF 32. The plane that lost out to the F 35.
Because it is...they stole the plans🤯
x-32*, and yes it does. when he said "it looks like the f35" im like, no, that stupid mouth clearly shows its dad is the x-32
Looks nothing like YF-23 , not to mention this is single engine and YF was double engined...
while the X-35 looks like the Yak 141 while this looks like the X-32 minus the big mouth
It does not. It has other wings in different position, another nose. The idea is the same: 1-engine fighter with the smiley face in the front and the pitch-elevators, but the realization is completely different
Unlike the the F 35 , which is not a single engined F22 , Checkmate is more like a single engined SU 57.
Which will help reduce development time. And it's very much export oriented.
Air inlet sucks in air great from straight ahead,but amending direction amends flo RATE and that checkmate 75 Chyte..ABSOLUTE GOB CHYTE..Like news saying Putin's regime crumbling,these designs are same media swill for dumbies..
@laynestaley4957 the Su-57 isn't a bad 5th gen, its just not a 5th gen, it has the RCS of a 4th gen.
The air intake is way too small....nice CARTOON
Although similar in appearance, the F-35 is also able to operate as a VTOL aircraft which enables it to operate in areas that are more restrictive than many other aircraft are capable of.
We are really comparing apples with oranges here, unless the Checkmate is also capable of hovering as well, then it only resembles the F-35.
It would be much more impressive if it was actually an operative aircraft, but since it has not yet made it to the assembly line, it is premature to be touting it’s prowess.
Thank you for posting these videos!
Please have an excellent and awesome day! ☀️
This is true but only the marine version F35 does the VTOL for use on the smaller carrier/assault ships they use. The B variant. The Navy C and Air Force A models shed that capability to save weight and due to their very different needs and use conventional take off and landing, the C being reinforced for catapulting off carriers. The F35 is a jack of all trades platform. He also mentioned it's an air superiority fighter which it really isn't. The F22 is THE world's greatest air superiority fighter, not the 35. Analogous to the Su-57 class and the F15EX to the Su-35 class in the 4++ category. Navy is gonna be keeping their Hornets for awhile to supplement the 35s.
The fact that it isn't trying to do as much likely will make the "Checkmate" cheaper to make than the F-35 even if it has basically the same abilities as the A Model. Even before considering that there may be less costs of the greedy/corruption type involved, and that they likely have been able to skip on some development due to using the existing F-35's shape as a starting point to work with.
Not sure why there are so many comments assuming that Russia cannot actually afford to develop something at least comparable to the F-35, while just being a one-size-fits-all non-S/VTOL fighter. Look, nothing against the F-35, the things are pretty amazing, but being the first guy to make something (especially if you jam it full of so many brand new features and have multiple variants) will generally make it more costly then being the second guy to make something.
@@ELcinegatto87 Since you brought up the F22, I'll just blab my opinion that the F-23 would have been better.
Mike Carbone,LOL! Checkmate is similar to the YAK 141! Which, 30 years later , the United States was able to copy and make F35
@@КонстантинБобриков-л5ц Really? The YAK-141 is a copy of the Convair Model 200A, down to the P&W designed and patented three bearing swivel nozzle, and the single stage front lift double engines. The SU-75 is a copy of the Northrop MRF-54E (1991-1993). Russia can do nothing but copy, because your gene pool is a sewage pit after the Bolshevik Revolution and WWII.
This concept is in no way shape or form a threat to F-35 sales. By the time this thing comes online, the F-35 will be operational for some 20 years and receive it's first MLU updates and will e a proven platform. FurthermoreRussian and American fighter platforms don't compete in the same markets (with a few exceptions).
the next problem for this Russian concept will be china, since China already surpassed Russia in almost every field of combat aircraft technology and 15 years from now russia will not be able to keep pace with Chinese technology anymore.
@Jasper Percabeth In 15 years Russia will be the lapdog of China following whatever China dictates. There will be no working together, Russia will ne happy if they will be allowed to WORK FOR China. Russian technology is so far behind thst it does matter very little today and will be no relevant in 15 years. China is the next contender to be the West‘s main foe but still stands little chance.
Oh really? Which CPU does it's systems use? One from a Sharp washing machine? And a Samsung A12 + Waze for precision navigation.
And a CANON camera from Japan.
@@xb1t2mm3ujf2Russians produce it's own CPU for military purposes. Don't be so naive.
@@CyarleyBlack Sure, it's even EMP-proof ruclips.net/video/KQwMu6LavKo/видео.html
The United States Air Force is so much further advanced than anything Russia has. One advanced F-16 could take out multiple Russion aircraft and they wouldn't even see it coming.
Cap brudda russia fighter jets have always impress everyone especially usa
lmao
@@Heythere12344 according to Russia that is
You gonna get disappointed with F-16 performance in Ukraine
@@MT-rg4fn Put our F-16's in there with our pilots and our Air commanders and you will see the F-16 as anything but a disappointment. You will think it is the greatest aircraft ever made. First like we always do we will take out any possible way of yall being able to detect it on radar. But all that will probably start a new war.
The words “voice recognition” made me cringe when I learned it would be used for controlling certain functions
Visually it looks like a stretched Boeing F-32 , the plane that everyone laughed at . Cockpit , intake , wings, tails ..............................................this is beautiful , hope they build it ..💛💙
I’m seeing two elements from the joint strike fighter program and both of them are coming from the Boeing X 32.
The engine intake is similar to the X 32 and it has a Pelikan tail.
Agree. I see it as well. Looks like a stretched, slim down and sexier X32A JSF prototype.
Su 75 the "stealth fighter" with a double chin
The name of the fighter aircraft is "Checkmate". The word "Checkmate" originates from Persian "Shah Mat" meaning "King is helpless" and the game of Chess itself originated in India...So, judging by the name the main market for this aircraft will be India and Iran.
well, Russia close friend
undoubtable
It’s not that deep
A very impressive and beautiful aircraft. Unfortunately, it has one problem - it doesn't exist.
All aircraft never existed in the first place.
My thoughts exactly, a scare tactic....they take our old found jets left at bases and reverse engineer them, always behind us.
Well, same was once said for many of the already existing Russia's modern weapons and military equipment, mostly just by some trolls and not real experts. Chances are high to see Su-75 first test flight next year already.
@@otvinta When people speak truth, Russians would call them trolls and traitors.
I'm sure the Soviet Union still exists only in Russia.
@@lauranydb7979 sounds like you love that sweet US propaganda. MUH F22
Voice control in a war machine is the most terrifying thing I've ever heard. Mostly because voice recognition is still rubbish and error prone.
Did you say, "fire?"
This video is 2 years old and the plane has still never flown.
Yeah, meanwhile US has flown 6th gen prototype already... Russia lagging behind as usual.
What I seem to notice about the eastern block is that the Soviet Union and Russian Federation has really good designs and concepts for military equipment, but lack funding and proper engineering know-how to successfully make them function as they were internet
Lack of funding? More like politicians went stealing spree
@@hehe-jg8zz and that is definitely true, but at the end of it they would lack the funds
Soviet union doesn't exist, but the russian spirit is great. Theyre starting to build their funding back up after the past destruction of the country.
@@jeremyr7147 hopefully they can pick themselves back up after this, it’d be interesting to see what comes up from the most resilient people on earth
Yup, the best plane in the world means nothing if you can't afford to build and maintain it.
0:28
*outer wing pylons*
"stealth"
That doesn't mean it'll have those outer pylons all the time.
Just like the F35
The model was made by this channel so the blame's kinda on them
Stelf
Someone's is stupid enough to not understand that this was an animation made of su 75 and the plane wont using them when it's on Stealth mode
When he said “has America very afraid” I knew he knew nothing about export or military powers. Lel
If you have ever watched the russian/american channel "RT", that is most of their content is propaganda by a young american guy.
The legacy of the Boeing X-32 lives on!
I believe the the Soviet design bureaus were always interested in the F-16 design and there is no reason why they would not still be in today’s Russia!
It’s not all about hand designed to copy. Soviet used the same hydroplaning software in the wind tunnel computer Aid to help designing itself that all looking similar. Soviets had many formerly Nazi German designers. The USA is not a Superman.
Why were they so interested?
@@joeclaridy because it is properly one of the best planes from teh cold war period, it has proven itself again and again
Video title: "America is scared of this new Russian fighter"
Me: "Get your binoculars, and head to the comments, kids! We're going Triggered 'Murican spotting!"
I’ve actually changed the title to make it less clickbaity
@@FoundAndExplained the title should "Russia's fanbois think this new stealth jet is better than F-35"
@@fuckheinschitt239 Not just russians. lol, the concept rosstec CEO said, was a request from UAE
@@fuckheinschitt239 hahah butthurt spotted under a minute
@@773-o2n yup that is you😂
It's so stealthy, that no one will ever see it fly.
good comment
So is ur father
@@Lucapanfil amazing comedic skills, ivan. 😐
@@wood1188 thx
SU 57,SU 75, SU 99, MIG 41,MIG 77, MIG 99....all lies
Ah yes, SU-262 because why not XD
If you're going to compare it to the F35 you need to compare it to the A model. If you want to use it on carriers the F35B&C models are your only options.
It is extremely hard to compare the real plane with the rendering...
They’ll be lucky to build a lawnmower at this point!
Hasn’t aged well
Yup. Russia has set back their aviation goals by at least a decade.
Let's see if the Sukhoi Su-73 "Checkmate" can counter an AIM-120 AMRAAM, assuming that wooden mock-up ever gets off the ground.
Ur father is prob as stealthy as ur fave jet “F22 raptor”
@@Lucapanfil At least I have one.
@@enbygaming5996 well y do u never see him? Is it his stealth tech
@@Lucapanfilnever see him? Russian bots are funny
@@RogueSkull Shiver me timbers an ai pfp user.
When they build one prototype, they will move on Su86.
Wake me up when it had its first flight...
12:56 they decided to replace it with the f-22, then the f-35 and now another f-16. What a great idea, right!
they almost decided to ressurrect the canadian avro arrow and give it some upgrades instead of choosing the f-35, even after 60 years a few upgrades and modern avionics and the avro arrow could easily contend with fifth generation fighters for a fraction of the cost, but uncle sam doesnt like competition, they always pressured foreign countries to not invest or buy from canada and they helped scrap the cl-84 which was canadas vtol craft that the osprey was based on decades later and they also pressured diefenbaker to scrap the avro arrow program which spelled the end for canadas aerospace industry, at that time canada was a world leader and had the worlds 4th largest airforce, were the 3rd country to launch a sattelite into space and after the avro arrow program was scrapped and 17,500 people were left jobless the best of the industry moved to the US and joined NASA and were instrumental in the success of the space program and the moon landing.
Can't be afraid of something that isn't even built. The F-35 is war tested and dangerous. There is also a huge difference in training between Russian and American pilots with American pilots get almost double flying hours than their Russian counter parts.
Ironically, It will be checkmated by other aircrafts very easily
Give me proof mr.bias
I think it is warranted to point out that "Checkmate" is the Russian designation for it - the Western designation for a fighter jet would have to begin with "F", like the "Fulcrum" or "Flanker". Therefore, a more appropriate name would be the NAFO designation of Su-75 "Femboy".
There's more to stealth than just shape alone... and stealth is one of the greatest kept secrets of the U.S. arsenal.
That is why the United States is using the discovery of the Russian physicist Peter Ufimtsev to build its "stealth", and Ufimtsev himself was invited as a consultant to build its "stealth bomber" B2. LOL!
Or it's biggest BS.
@@SmotritelMayaka29 so started stealth better technology??
@@SmotritelMayaka29 actually the us adopted some stealth factors from Germanrny during wwII xd
@@a1marine105 Yes, it looks like the German "Horten Ho IX". But before the invention of Ufimtsev, it was impossible to make calculations of the parameters in advance. Even the Germans did not do "stealth", this effect was discovered by accident during testing. And only thanks to Ufimtsev it became possible to calculate the shape and materials of the aircraft in projects without "trial and error".
The weak point of Su-75 is that it is a cardboard mockup at this time:) Similar mockups were shown by the Turks(TF-X) and Brits(BAE Tempest) man years ago. South Korea even shown something resembling something close to the actual prototype (KF-X).
Whether there is any real possibility of any of these mockups will fly is a matter for speculation. In any case- calling 'Su75' an 'aircraft' or a "prototype" is the extreme stretch of imagination:) the "Su-75" is bets decribed as a "funding drive for a development to produce a prototype that might generate some interest from buyers.... hopefully....potentioally"
Our allies keep us up on the content of their air fleets.
The most underrated comments. At this point it's just a cardboard and a animated video potentially a funding drive from interested parties
A plane is so powerful on paper or on video but in actual combat scenario it's a different ball game because you have enemy to fight to that's not a video game but actual game of death! I'm not saying that Russian jet fighter are inferior to that of the west because they are just capable as the west planes are. What I'm saying is it depends on the pilot capabilities and common sense in the battlefield.
America fighters are not always the best that you expected from the World War Two and mini gulf war . America lost 9,000 planes to Russian Mig fighters in Vietnam. One of John Mc Cain got shot down heroless British pilots are better than the America pilots. Russians are supremacy flight fighters now, Than the powerful formidable Soviet time.
@@Mikhelinx Americans never went below a 2:1 kill ratio in Vietnam. The worst example of American aircraft performance you can find and it’s still 2:1.
@@fatstacksfatlips8708 yeah all American planes sit in a boneyard uselessness. Russia Checkmate capability shoot down six America fighters at once time. Many German engineering and science moved to Moscow.
@@Mikhelinx Yeah Russia #1 👆👆😲😮🇷🇺 ruski fighter shoot 100000 imperialist pig plane out sky mother Russia 🇷🇺 Russia #1 !
@@fatstacksfatlips8708 plus Russians have a new anti-aircraft S-500 that can shoot down the imperialism planes within 500 miles radius. The Americans planes will be shot down by S-500 superior Missile within a few couple miles after take off from the airstrip either sea or land. I proud of my Russians
We always overestimate their abilities.
You mentioned a 'dogfight'. Never in aviation history, has a dogfight occurred above 300 kts IAS. (max). 250 is usually tops
Huh? You need to elaborate
@@RidinDirtyRollinBurnouts I think hes saying modern jets dont dogfight, its not WW2 anymore
🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️
the question is if they can build more than 5, which i highly doubt
So far not even 1
Strange. . .it looks almost EXACTLY like the YF-23 with one engine! Mmm. . .
Yeah unless they make a completely radiacally different design its a copy according to people like you. Unless it has 3 engines and reverse wings its a copy.
In stealth jet market bringing a new design is hard they have limited choices for design you will see this even more
Ah yes ," it has wings and intakes so it must be a copy" gang
@@sidharthcs2110 people are idiots. u can only do so much. u cant make a stealth pizza box thats just not possible
@@ilyavolkov2556 You never know. I have no doubt every single US military contractor would kill entire orphanages to sell an exceedingly overpriced and barely working stealth pizza box - like the B-2.
Front reminds me of the Boeing ATF delta wing fighter.
Russia claims a bunch of crap about their capabilities, see how their systems are doing in Ukraine. The Su-57 is barely low fourth gen RCS but they developed AI for this thing? Seems like a lot of marketing.
As soon as you said ''Argentina'' I laughed out loud. Does Russia really believe we have the reason, or more importantly MONEY to buy such a fighter?
After being completely stuffed by a Junta and some "politicians" I'm surprised you are doing as well as you are. It's like you succeed despite your government. Same as here really.
Bruh momento
El país está a punto de gastar 600 millones (verdes, obviamente) o bien en los JF17 Block III o en los MiG-35 porque la FFAA está literalmente en bolas desde el retiro de los Mirage y el ya cercano retiro de los A-4. Y quieren que Rusia ponga instalaciones de mantenimiento en el país poniendo de excusa que "si adquieren los MiG el mantenimiento y la logística será un problema". A mí me suena a que de paso están allanando el terreno para adquirir estos bichos sin problema en el futuro, que dicho sea de paso si esos son los números finales serían hasta más baratos que los MiG increíblemente...
@@fakulm1436 Gasto completamente innecesario, Argentina haciendo estupideces como siempre. Preocupante el futuro de este pais
The USA might give them some old F10's to protect themselves.
Maybe if you guys want to take over that little island again
For one youre comparing a pretty much brand new plane to one that really only started to enter service in 2005, it this thing really does counter the F-35 and 22 Im willing to bet we have the tech to put into a new plane and beat it
@@Attaxalotl let's not forget the Russians keep misrepresenting the F-35 as an air superiority fighter and not its proper designation which is a multirole fighter. For some reason they specifically keep using the B model but never the A or C model.
According to the Air Force, the US has already flown a prototype 6th Gen fighter
@@jessekane6224 doesnt change the fact of what theyre comparing but alright lol
This aircraft has the same vibe as the Mig-21
reminds me a lot of the boeing x-32
@@shatter5593 Yes, I can understand by the intake, but the X-32 was quite stubby while this is quite long.
@@thejdmguru621 ik that but it just reminds me so much of it
Someone in Russia liked both of the JSF prototypes, so they designed a plane with the Boeing front end mated to the rear end of the Lockheed.
Judging by looks alone, the SU-75 looks almost like a MiG-21 mixed with an F-35 and made stealth. So, I mean... Why not make a stealth MiG-21 with upgraded avionics and an improved engine? It would make an excellent low-cost interceptor and light strike fighter.
I dont think that’s possible
Stealth requires a lot more than putting some RAM and internal weapons bays on an airframe and calling it a day, Boeing discovered that the hard way when they tried making the F-15 stealth for their Silent Eagle prototype and it barely made a difference in its RCS. The entire airframe has to have stealth characteristics, and the Mig-21 clearly doesn't fit the bill. This prototype doesn't look like it will be much of a match for Western 5th gen aircraft but if it does actually get built it will be way better than a "stealthy" Mig-21, that's for sure
@@yomama629 stealth is also a lot harder these days due to all the electronic noise.(cell towers, wifi, civilian radio and radar, ect). The IR satalites can also see the heat from engines and air friction.
"Just upgrade a platform from the 60's!"
Is such a normie take on military development. It betrays a complete incapacity to understand the design concepts being discussed.
@@benfennell6842 super tomcat has entered the chat*
Interesting to see where the AI goes vs having remote pilots.
In December '22 the USAF paired a modified F-16D with an AI pilot and had it fly around completely unmanned. (Ok, it wasn't entirely free, there was a second F-16 that was manned and the AI was basically acting as his wingman; still pretty impressive though.)
The main issue with remotely controlled planes is input lag: from the time it takes for the drone to spot a threat to relay it to the controller, and then for the drone to get a command from the controller and respond to said threat, can be a delay of 2-3 seconds. Doesn't sound that long, but when you're dogfighting or defending against missile those lost seconds can make all the difference.