One important thing about the meter -- the meter for the readout in the viewfinder is not the same as the one that works the shutter -- they are two separate circuits. I have two XA, one in which the internal readout is about two stops low, and one in which the needle doesn't move at all. Both still expose properly. So-- just because the meter needle doesn't show proper speed doesn't mean the camera is bad. Sadly, this needle seems prone to bumps and age, but the camera can still work fine.
Galen Rowell, noted nature photographer, liked the XA and took some stunning photos. I managed a camera store for a lot of years and sold a lot of them. I also took in quite a few for repair. The meters and main circuit boards were the usual problem areas. I still have a working XA along with the A16 flash, but rarely use it as I prefer my Rollei 35S. Very good video!
I loved the XA in the mid to late '80's. I had one in Asia and shot primarily color positive (slide) film. The XA can shoot glorious, well-saturated slides. I got many images that I would have missed completely because I did not carry my Canon T90 with me everywhere like I did my XA. I loved having the manual depth of field control. I never would have parted with it except for the Camp Fire that destroyed 19,000 structures in my home town of Paradise, California. I did not have time to grab my entire collection of cameras. Fondly remembered are my XA, Canon A1, and my Canon T90. I had really hoped that a digital back would be made to fit my T90 as was done for other cameras.
I’ve got a Olympus XA2 and I really like it too. That model has a f 3.5 lens (enough for me) and uses zone focusing. Of course, it’s not super sharp and in some conditions produces really noticeable vignetting, but I think it’s worth it for what it is.Shooting with it, you get a similar experience to using a disposable camera, but with more control and better quality materials. Overall, it came in really handy when travelling or going to concerts / festivals, the only complaint I have is the ISO dial, which only goes up to 800 and that is really limiting when wanting to grab a few quick snaps at low light enviroments like concerts
The XA2 has a simpler and much better lens design - a 4 element Tessar copy. Optically, it runs rings around the lens in the XA. The lack of a rangefinder is not much disadvantage from the XA, as the tiny rangefinder baseline for the XA rangefinder makes it barely adequate, and its dim viewfinder makes it almost unusable on many units.
Recently I've stumbled upon older model, 35 RC, and bought it immediately for peanuts. While the lens is tighter (42mm, still f2.8), the camera is made out of metal, features time priority and manual settings, works in manual mode without batteries, focussing is easy and precise. Works like a charm, I'm happy with it like a pig in the mud 😊
I came for the camera. I stayed for the hat! Super informative video. It certainly is a great little camera- I'd love to get my hands on one! Love the captures too. You don't see too many people capturing b&w on point and shoot cameras. Thanks for taking the time to make the video!
G'day, mate! :) THank you very much for the kind words, I hope that this video was helpful. There's another one currently in the edit and it features more hat(s), I hope it doesn't disappoint ;). Cheers!
The XA has two meters. The one that shows in the viewfinder is not the one that sets the exposure. It is not unusual for the one in the display to be off, but the camera still exposes correctly. IMHO the XA2 is a better all around user camera. I also really enjoy the XA1.
@@rocc6596 The XA if you want control of aperture. The other models are a bit more of point and shoot. If you can afford it, get more than one. That way you can put different film stocks in them. I keep color in one and black and white in the other.
I got one the original as a gift and it is super has the flash and is in a sturdy case - has light leaks but seals are kaput and I have removed them and have replacements on order from Ebay ! My advise is to get a camera strap unfortunately it's a generic and hard to get - I got one and it is super as camera is slippy to hold ! Its a bit of an engineering marvel ! waiting for those seal and have rolls of Kodak Portra lined up !
I love my Olympus XA over all other film cameras that I have, easy to operate and not to ruin those expensive shots. P. S. Just not sure if film lab is doing it or this camera but no matter what film I use with XA, everything is always on the bluer side 🤔
I just got lucky, I got camera xa for 40£ for parts to repair the one I already have... It's in mint conditions and it turn out it only needed new batteries! Plus I manage to repair the old one I have! So now I have 2 working xa for a steal price
Hey csaqwi, this is the first one they made, the Olympus XA (no numbers after the A). Look for the one with f2.8 lens aperture and manual aperture control. Cheers! 😉
Pozdrav, danas sam tek naletio na vaš kanal. Nisam znao da ima ovako kvalitetnih kanala iz područje Hrvatske. Volim ovakve videe, pratim kanale poput Grainydays, Willem Verbeck, Thomas Heaton pa mi je drago da mogu pratiti i nešto naše. 🙂🇭🇷
No, the problem is the lens, unfortunately it's just not very sharp. I've had 3 of these over the years and they were all the same as far as poor sharpness. It has an unusual optical formula that enables the rear of the lens to be positioned very close to the film plane. This is what limits it's sharpness. Just about any compact 35mm rangefinder camera from the 1970s and even a few of the better point and shoot cameras will outperform the XA. I kept one of the XAs because I love the brilliant design.
Oh come on! Film has plenty of sharpness and image quality. The problem with the XA is that it does not. It's lens has the poorest sharpness and greatest amounts of vignetting and lens aberrations of any 35mm camera of its era or since. In short, it is a major stinker. Its image quality will be fine for use with digital scans for social media, cell phones, computers, etc. It was intended to produce vacation snapshots, 3x5 inch prints, nothing more. Stay within its optical limits and be happy. Pretend it's an option for your Nikon or Leica? Your just kidding yourself.
Some of my sharpest portraits are shot on my XA. If I'm getting soft images, it's because I'm not focusing right. ruclips.net/video/SsGAA-af6rw/видео.html
I don't have this camera anymore as I sold it so I cannot check but - if the shutter speeds are whown for a given aperture and ISO setting, you can check this against a separate light meter or another camera, even digital one. If the shutter speeds are not shown but rather simply set by the camera internally when the photo is taken, then, I'm afraid, you need to take an exposure with a camera you know works, then another with the XA and check the result.
Great everyday camera I carry this thing all day with me at work to take pictures
One important thing about the meter -- the meter for the readout in the viewfinder is not the same as the one that works the shutter -- they are two separate circuits. I have two XA, one in which the internal readout is about two stops low, and one in which the needle doesn't move at all. Both still expose properly.
So-- just because the meter needle doesn't show proper speed doesn't mean the camera is bad. Sadly, this needle seems prone to bumps and age, but the camera can still work fine.
I have three, one that shows the perfect exposure thru the needle and two that underexpose by at least one stop, that's a relief ❤
Galen Rowell, noted nature photographer, liked the XA and took some stunning photos. I managed a camera store for a lot of years and sold a lot of them. I also took in quite a few for repair. The meters and main circuit boards were the usual problem areas. I still have a working XA along with the A16 flash, but rarely use it as I prefer my Rollei 35S. Very good video!
I loved the XA in the mid to late '80's. I had one in Asia and shot primarily color positive (slide) film. The XA can shoot glorious, well-saturated slides. I got many images that I would have missed completely because I did not carry my Canon T90 with me everywhere like I did my XA. I loved having the manual depth of field control. I never would have parted with it except for the Camp Fire that destroyed 19,000 structures in my home town of Paradise, California. I did not have time to grab my entire collection of cameras. Fondly remembered are my XA, Canon A1, and my Canon T90. I had really hoped that a digital back would be made to fit my T90 as was done for other cameras.
Glen, so so sorry to hear about you lr loss of home in such a terrible accident 😪. Glad you were ok though!
I’ve got a Olympus XA2 and I really like it too. That model has a f 3.5 lens (enough for me) and uses zone focusing. Of course, it’s not super sharp and in some conditions produces really noticeable vignetting, but I think it’s worth it for what it is.Shooting with it, you get a similar experience to using a disposable camera, but with more control and better quality materials. Overall, it came in really handy when travelling or going to concerts / festivals, the only complaint I have is the ISO dial, which only goes up to 800 and that is really limiting when wanting to grab a few quick snaps at low light enviroments like concerts
The XA2 has a simpler and much better lens design - a 4 element Tessar copy. Optically, it runs rings around the lens in the XA. The lack of a rangefinder is not much disadvantage from the XA, as the tiny rangefinder baseline for the XA rangefinder makes it barely adequate, and its dim viewfinder makes it almost unusable on many units.
Recently I've stumbled upon older model, 35 RC, and bought it immediately for peanuts. While the lens is tighter (42mm, still f2.8), the camera is made out of metal, features time priority and manual settings, works in manual mode without batteries, focussing is easy and precise. Works like a charm, I'm happy with it like a pig in the mud 😊
I came for the camera. I stayed for the hat!
Super informative video. It certainly is a great little camera- I'd love to get my hands on one!
Love the captures too. You don't see too many people capturing b&w on point and shoot cameras.
Thanks for taking the time to make the video!
G'day, mate! :) THank you very much for the kind words, I hope that this video was helpful. There's another one currently in the edit and it features more hat(s), I hope it doesn't disappoint ;). Cheers!
@@alexander.starbuck i can't wait to see it!!
great video. superb location, very tactile, loved the music, and that you could hear the camera winding after each shot.
Thank you, I’m glad you liked it! 😉
Sve si bolji bolji! Olympus was my last film Camera, back in time there about 2000!
The XA has two meters. The one that shows in the viewfinder is not the one that sets the exposure. It is not unusual for the one in the display to be off, but the camera still exposes correctly. IMHO the XA2 is a better all around user camera. I also really enjoy the XA1.
Thanks Tim, good to know! ;)
So which one should I get?
@@rocc6596 The XA if you want control of aperture. The other models are a bit more of point and shoot. If you can afford it, get more than one. That way you can put different film stocks in them. I keep color in one and black and white in the other.
I got one the original as a gift and it is super has the flash and is in a sturdy case - has light leaks but seals are kaput and I have removed them and have replacements on order from Ebay !
My advise is to get a camera strap unfortunately it's a generic and hard to get - I got one and it is super as camera is slippy to hold !
Its a bit of an engineering marvel ! waiting for those seal and have rolls of Kodak Portra lined up !
Hope you have fun with your new buddy! ;)
Also, if you’re shooting in lowlight the shutter speed could affect the sharpness of the photo.
I love my Olympus XA over all other film cameras that I have, easy to operate and not to ruin those expensive shots.
P. S. Just not sure if film lab is doing it or this camera but no matter what film I use with XA, everything is always on the bluer side 🤔
Quality content right there! ^^ 🤍 Special love for Olympus! (And your HAT :p) :) xx
I just got lucky, I got camera xa for 40£ for parts to repair the one I already have... It's in mint conditions and it turn out it only needed new batteries! Plus I manage to repair the old one I have! So now I have 2 working xa for a steal price
I understand that only silver-oxide batteries should be used in the XA. Otherwise there can be issues with the meter and shutter.
Great video. Thanks. Love your style. And I love the end quote too. Peace
Thanks Bill 🤗
Great looking video, nice work!
I am inspired! Fantastic photos!
Thanks man! ;)
Awesome!!!!!
The best, lega!
ideemo 👏🏼
Which model of the XA is this? Or is it it’s own?
Hey csaqwi, this is the first one they made, the Olympus XA (no numbers after the A). Look for the one with f2.8 lens aperture and manual aperture control. Cheers! 😉
@@alexander.starbuck amazing, cheers mate!!
Odličan video. Bravo!
Hvala puno! 🤗
Yes, it is a very good Camera, even the cheaper XA2, but I prefer the Minox 35 ML and Leica Minilux which I have both.
These cameras cannot really be compared as some are rangefinders and some are point and shoots.
Great video! NowI want to shoot film! :)
You SHOULD! I somehow know, that, khm, you've got the camera, some film and development sorted out 😁
Pozdrav, danas sam tek naletio na vaš kanal. Nisam znao da ima ovako kvalitetnih kanala iz područje Hrvatske. Volim ovakve videe, pratim kanale poput Grainydays, Willem Verbeck, Thomas Heaton pa mi je drago da mogu pratiti i nešto naše. 🙂🇭🇷
good job my brother
Thank you! 🤗
All slightly overexposed?
Could be due to my editing, screen set-up or just plain bad taste :)
No, the problem is the lens, unfortunately it's just not very sharp. I've had 3 of these over the years and they were all the same as far as poor sharpness.
It has an unusual optical formula that enables the rear of the lens to be positioned very close to the film plane. This is what limits it's sharpness. Just about any compact 35mm rangefinder camera from the 1970s and even a few of the better point and shoot cameras will outperform the XA.
I kept one of the XAs because I love the brilliant design.
Oh come on! Film has plenty of sharpness and image quality. The problem with the XA is that it does not. It's lens has the poorest sharpness and greatest amounts of vignetting and lens aberrations of any 35mm camera of its era or since. In short, it is a major stinker. Its image quality will be fine for use with digital scans for social media, cell phones, computers, etc. It was intended to produce vacation snapshots, 3x5 inch prints, nothing more. Stay within its optical limits and be happy. Pretend it's an option for your Nikon or Leica? Your just kidding yourself.
Some of my sharpest portraits are shot on my XA. If I'm getting soft images, it's because I'm not focusing right.
ruclips.net/video/SsGAA-af6rw/видео.html
I saw a man carry a huge capsule walk around.
how can you tell if the internal light meter works?
I don't have this camera anymore as I sold it so I cannot check but - if the shutter speeds are whown for a given aperture and ISO setting, you can check this against a separate light meter or another camera, even digital one.
If the shutter speeds are not shown but rather simply set by the camera internally when the photo is taken, then, I'm afraid, you need to take an exposure with a camera you know works, then another with the XA and check the result.