In 720p resolution, the d435 works without a projector, which greatly affects the quality of the resulting depth map. Try running it at a resolution of 848 x 480. There it supports up to 90 fps
Nice Video, but can you maybe make a video where you compare the z-accuracy and range of both systems. I think this might also interest other people as getting z-info is one of the problems in computer-vision. For example, get some measurement tape , lay it out, take an object, track it alongside tape with both systems and tell us which is more accurate or maybe there are other problems like certain surfaces that falsify the measurement
D435 went from 188$ to a crazy 314$. D455, a slightly better version, is now sold for 419$, but is the same crap. It's much easier to go for Azure Kinect nowadays, muuuch better noise levels.
Thanks for the video Marcel. Do you know if I can use any of them (with some hacks) to scan small objects like ears with enough depth resolution? (e.g. 0.2 mm )
I tested the Azure Kinect in outdoor situations. The results were slightly worse than indoor, depending on the lightning conditions. If sun shines directly into the camera, the results get bad. For the Intel RealSense D435, I can not tell for sure. Somebody else has tested this?
You need to compare D435 with post-processing. It definitely improves the noise problem. But, I agree that Azure is much better.
In 720p resolution, the d435 works without a projector, which greatly affects the quality of the resulting depth map.
Try running it at a resolution of 848 x 480. There it supports up to 90 fps
Where did you find this info ? (and what's the d415 equivalent ?)
@@guillaumeausset8254 Microsoft focus on the Azure Kinect, and does not provide different types like Intel RealSense Products.
Nice Video, but can you maybe make a video where you compare the z-accuracy and range of both systems. I think this might also interest other people as getting z-info is one of the problems in computer-vision. For example, get some measurement tape , lay it out, take an object, track it alongside tape with both systems and tell us which is more accurate or maybe there are other problems like certain surfaces that falsify the measurement
Microsoft Azure Kinect is much better than Intel RealSense series. Thanks a lot for the comparison. :D
D435 went from 188$ to a crazy 314$. D455, a slightly better version, is now sold for 419$, but is the same crap. It's much easier to go for Azure Kinect nowadays, muuuch better noise levels.
Thanks for your video.Where can I learn to use the kinect？
See link in description 😊
Thanks for the comparison. Do you have comparison of them on night or with no light?
Thanks for the video Marcel.
Do you know if I can use any of them (with some hacks) to scan small objects like ears with enough depth resolution? (e.g. 0.2 mm )
Hey there, sorry, I can not tell you. You need to try...
@@89ohio ok, thanks 👍
Intel wins for sure in the artistic department! 👹
Microsoft Azure Kinect is much better than Intel RealSense series
Hello Mr. Marcel;
Which one is more suitable for outdoors work?
Thanks
I tested the Azure Kinect in outdoor situations. The results were slightly worse than indoor, depending on the lightning conditions. If sun shines directly into the camera, the results get bad. For the Intel RealSense D435, I can not tell for sure. Somebody else has tested this?
@@89ohio Thank you
Software? Thanx
Visisble on screen...
"Intel RealSense Viewer v2.42.0" & "Microsoft Azure Viewer"