don't use the quotient rule

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
  • Don't use the quotient rule, use logarithmic differentiation. We will first let y=sqrt((x-1)/(x^4+1)) and then take the natural log both sides. Then we can use implicit differentiation. : )
    I think you will also like this video: Calculus Teacher vs. Power Rule Student: • Calculus Teacher vs. P...
    Get a derivative t-shirt: 👉 bit.ly/derivat...
    Use "WELCOME10" for 10% off
    Subscribe for more precalculus & calculus tutorials 👉 @just calculus
    -------------------
    If you find this channel helpful and want to support it, then you can
    join the channel membership and have your name in the video descriptions:
    👉bit.ly/joinjus...
    buy a math shirt or a hoodie (10% off with the code "WELCOME10"):
    👉 bit.ly/bprp_merch
    I use these markers 👉 amzn.to/3skwj1E
    -------------------
    😊 Thanks to all channel members 😊
    Sandglass Dªrksun Seth Morris Andrea Mele
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    "Just Calculus" is dedicated to helping students who are taking precalculus, AP calculus, GCSE, A-Level, year 12 maths, college calculus, or high school calculus. Topics include functions, limits, indeterminate forms, derivatives, and their applications, integration techniques and their applications, separable differential equations, sequences, series convergence tests, power series a lot more. Feel free to leave calculus questions in the comment section and subscribe for future videos 👉 bit.ly/just_calc
    ---------------------------------------------------------
    Best wishes to you,
    #justcalculus

Комментарии • 38

  • @tibetsonmez6664
    @tibetsonmez6664 2 года назад +246

    I just love it when he doesn't cut the improper intros

    • @stephenbeck7222
      @stephenbeck7222 2 года назад +13

      0:50 basically “uh let’s just do the problem ok?”

    • @neilgerace355
      @neilgerace355 2 года назад +26

      He is using "implicit introduction"

    • @DxRzYT
      @DxRzYT 2 года назад +5

      LOL, he's a legend

    • @Lolwutdesu9000
      @Lolwutdesu9000 2 года назад

      I was wondering whether or not this was just leading to a joke or something... But I guess he just couldn't be bothered to do the editing. Or am I missing something? New to the channel.

    • @HappyGardenOfLife
      @HappyGardenOfLife 2 года назад

      @@Lolwutdesu9000 watch his tips for math youtubers video and you'll understand. It's definitely not out of laziness. Students just like to see his mistakes left in.

  • @anthonyholmes8114
    @anthonyholmes8114 2 года назад +22

    My maths professor taught us the quotient rule, then immediately said "I don't use it though; it's ugly".

    • @robertlunderwood
      @robertlunderwood 2 года назад +5

      I just take the denominator, raise it to the -1 power, and use the product and chain rules. I don't have to worry about order that way.

  • @randomjin9392
    @randomjin9392 2 года назад +27

    .. or just square, cross-multiply and get y²(x⁴+1)=x-1 and differentiate! 2yy'(x⁴+1)+4x³y²=1 and the rest is fraction arithmetic.

  • @NayimKay
    @NayimKay 2 года назад +18

    No quotient rule?
    Cool, I'll make it (x-1)(x^4+1)^-1 then ill use the product rule.

  • @two697
    @two697 2 года назад +18

    I never use the quotient rule. I just write f(x)/g(x) as f(x)g(x)^(-1) and differentiate using the product rule. In this case, I probably would've squared first

    • @AchtungBaby77
      @AchtungBaby77 2 года назад +2

      You're basically still doing the quotient rule, just in an indirect way.

    • @two697
      @two697 2 года назад +3

      @@AchtungBaby77 yh it is but I don't actually have to remember the quotient rule

  • @fabiotiburzi
    @fabiotiburzi 2 года назад +8

    Today english is out of focus. Sometimes it just happen

  • @roberto.abella
    @roberto.abella 2 года назад +8

    Nice! You seem to be a little bit off.. I hope you're doing well. Thanks for the video!!

  • @Zeusbeer
    @Zeusbeer 2 года назад +8

    Can we havs a hard and interesting integral again? :)

  • @antoa.2942
    @antoa.2942 2 года назад +2

    I have just watched the 100 integral video. It's so nice

  • @bradley9856
    @bradley9856 2 года назад +4

    I had totally forgotten about differentiating ln where you have to multiply by the derivative of the bracket, I also would have written it as 1/2ln(x-1)-(x^4 +1) which is probably wrong. Great video as always :)

  • @hata6290
    @hata6290 2 года назад +3

    BEAUTIFUL video :)

    • @hata6290
      @hata6290 2 года назад +1

      By a very beautiful man 😘

  • @cycklist
    @cycklist 2 года назад +5

    Mate, editing!

  • @martimlopes8833
    @martimlopes8833 2 года назад

    Isn't it problematic to turn y = √(...) into lny = ln(√(...)), since y could originally be equal to zero, and now it can't?

  • @jiugo
    @jiugo 2 года назад

    Found this just at the RIGHT time. Thank you

  • @darkpoision7269
    @darkpoision7269 Год назад

    yo the intro goes hard

  • @user-wu8yq1rb9t
    @user-wu8yq1rb9t 2 года назад +4

    Cut?!
    I don't care about it at all (even it's more real, just like we are present in the class).
    The important thing is just Math ... And it was great as always.
    Thank you so much dear Teacher 💖

  • @canys24bb78
    @canys24bb78 2 года назад +1

    Amazing 😀👍🏽

  • @Violent_Sea_Urchin
    @Violent_Sea_Urchin 2 года назад

    Dude this was meant to simplify the expression, but the final result looks even more confusing haha

    • @phxbaka4356
      @phxbaka4356 2 года назад

      he isnt simplifying the expression though? hes differentiating it

  • @agrajyadav2951
    @agrajyadav2951 2 года назад

    Oh yes sir, let's see

  • @finmat95
    @finmat95 2 года назад

    Ok, anyway i'm going to use the quotient rule

  • @Lolwutdesu9000
    @Lolwutdesu9000 2 года назад

    Guy looks a bit stressed 😔

  • @douglaslee7034
    @douglaslee7034 2 года назад +2

    Hahhahahahahahaahah

  • @ieatgarbage8771
    @ieatgarbage8771 2 года назад

    A day early xdd