Not sure if this makes a difference in your analysis but it actually said 99.9 percent. Leaving 0.1 percent chance not 1 percent. I want to point out another mistake you made which is a common mistake everyone makes. The writer of the ransom note never said they "were a small foreign faction". The ransom notes does not say "we are a small foreign faction". If they were a small foreign faction then you would expect them to say "we are a small foreign faction". But they didn't. They said "we are a group of individuals". ... "That represents (in a business sense) a small foreign faction( which is probably a metaphor for John Ramsey" the killer is letting John know they represent him in some kind of way from what it appears. And finally. The Ramseys were framed by a clever killer. Ramsey pen Ramsey paper Ramsey paint brush just left hanging from JonBenet's neck and not thrown out after strangulation proves this killer framed the Ramsey's.
Thanks. I confirmed the note says 99% not 99.9%. www.statementanalysis.com/jonbenet-ramsey-murder/ransom-note/ But, good observation on the "representing" part. It is easy to overlook that. And, you may be onto something significant there.
@@thenewperiodcr I stand corrected. 99 percent sorry about that. Read this quote from the Ramsey's book "the death of innocence" and you will see the person who should be all of our suspect #1. The ransom notes told John to call nobody. No friends or police. But see who he had to call, suspect #1. Follow the $118,000 money.. "I call my banker friend Rod Westmoreland in Atlanta to arrange the ransom money and discover that he has left for his parents home in Tupelo, Mississippi. I get through to his assistant at Atlanta's Merrill Lynch office. I'm thankful that today is a work day. I quickly explain what has happened, and she says she'll get in touch with Rod right away"." The phone rings. Everyone freezes as I slowly pick up the receiver". "Hello, I answer tentatively. John, this is Rod. We've arranged for u to have a credit line of $118,000 dollars on your Visa card. You can go to a local bank and get the money as a cash advance". "John Fernie has been in contact with the president of a local bank, a personal friend of his, and is working to get the ransom money ready. John (Fernie not Ramsey) goes to the bank with my credit card to get the cash". The banker friend would be in control of everything wouldn't he?
@@thenewperiodcr my last comment was erased. But I stand corrected it's 99 percent. Sorry about that. Can I get your thoughts on another comment from the ransom note? What do you think about this comment ... "Make sure that you bring an adequate attache to the bank". More specifically what do you make of the use of the word "bring" instead of "take "? Where will the writer be when John "brings" the attahe?
Not sure if this makes a difference in your analysis but it actually said 99.9 percent. Leaving 0.1 percent chance not 1 percent.
I want to point out another mistake you made which is a common mistake everyone makes.
The writer of the ransom note never said they "were a small foreign faction".
The ransom notes does not say "we are a small foreign faction". If they were a small foreign faction then you would expect them to say "we are a small foreign faction".
But they didn't.
They said "we are a group of individuals". ... "That represents (in a business sense) a small foreign faction( which is probably a metaphor for John Ramsey" the killer is letting John know they represent him in some kind of way from what it appears.
And finally. The Ramseys were framed by a clever killer.
Ramsey pen
Ramsey paper
Ramsey paint brush just left hanging from JonBenet's neck and not thrown out after strangulation proves this killer framed the Ramsey's.
Thanks. I confirmed the note says 99% not 99.9%.
www.statementanalysis.com/jonbenet-ramsey-murder/ransom-note/
But, good observation on the "representing" part. It is easy to overlook that. And, you may be onto something significant there.
@@thenewperiodcr I stand corrected. 99 percent sorry about that. Read this quote from the Ramsey's book "the death of innocence" and you will see the person who should be all of our suspect #1. The ransom notes told John to call nobody. No friends or police.
But see who he had to call, suspect #1. Follow the $118,000 money..
"I call my banker friend Rod Westmoreland in Atlanta to arrange the ransom money and discover that he has left for his parents home in Tupelo, Mississippi. I get through to his assistant at Atlanta's Merrill Lynch office. I'm thankful that today is a work day. I quickly explain what has happened, and she says she'll get in touch with Rod right away"." The phone rings. Everyone freezes as I slowly pick up the receiver". "Hello, I answer tentatively. John, this is Rod. We've arranged for u to have a credit line of $118,000 dollars on your Visa card. You can go to a local bank and get the money as a cash advance". "John Fernie has been in contact with the president of a local bank, a personal friend of his, and is working to get the ransom money ready. John (Fernie not Ramsey) goes to the bank with my credit card to get the cash".
The banker friend would be in control of everything wouldn't he?
@@thenewperiodcr my last comment was erased. But I stand corrected it's 99 percent. Sorry about that.
Can I get your thoughts on another comment from the ransom note?
What do you think about this comment ...
"Make sure that you bring an adequate attache to the bank".
More specifically what do you make of the use of the word "bring" instead of "take "?
Where will the writer be when John "brings" the attahe?
@@keithgreer462 Right. I think, more evidence of a fabrication, or a poor choice of words. Good observation.