What do you think about the raw till 4 diet? It's a fruit based low fat vegan diet. (It's basically raw fruits and vegetables throughout the day, and one meal of cooked starches for dinner.)
Dr Mcdougall talks about it on his website Dr Mcdougall dot com. Under the topic of allergic reactions to food. Here's the link www.drmcdougall.com/education/common-health-problems/allergic-reactions-to-food/?_gl=1*1llblkg*_ga*MTQ1OTEwMTcyMy4xNzM2MDMzNjAw*_ga_M3W192WV0Q*MTczNjAzMzU5OS4xLjEuMTczNjAzMzYwNS41NC4wLjA.
Question: What if diet A is 10 % fat and B is 25 % fat but diet A is 4000 kcal while B is 1600 kcal? Assuming that both are eaten neither above nor under TDEE (total daily energy expenditure), which one is better and why? After all, A and B each have 400 kcal from fat. I'd guess that A is better, because B would indicate a sedentary lifestyle, while A involves physical exercise, otherwise they are similar. This leads to an interesting inquiry, at least to me but I think also for others who have similar TDEEs, because I have a TDEE of around 4 Mcal (= 4000 kcal) and I don't know yet where I am currently at fatwise, I'd have to track it and put into the computer to say, but say I'd be still at 30%, that would mean I'd get 1200 kcal from fats or circa 130 grams of dietary fat. Now this would be the same amount of fat as a 75% fat diet @1600 kcal, so basically sedentary keto women or keto guys aiming for weight loss. Given this, I'll probably set the goal at around < 15 % fat or below 66 grams of fat or something in that ballpark.
Ok, there seems to be a reasoning error in my guess because the flow, what gets into the bloodstream, is proportionally or in its composition different. The composition would be derived and in that sense based on 10% fat vs. 25% fat, and for the other examples 30% vs 75%. So A and B are dissimilar and my guess is that diet A is better than diet B because 1) diet B indicates a sedentary lifestyle and diet A a physically active one and 2) 10% fat intake seems to be in many cases better than a 25% fat intake.
Also, I can't really imagine thick and slow blood to have a good passage. I mean it would be dense but dense like a sludge without the tension or compactness like say a fast river. On the other hand, you'd also not wanna have a large bursting river shooting through the eye of a needle. So it starts to make clear sense to me that you wanna have wide, non-constricted blood vessels and a certain blood viscosity that fairs wells neither too thick nor too thin, although generally thin would be better, I guess.
Also, the starch-based stuff makes a lot of sense to me. I mean, one has just to look at the blue zones (or healthy elders in general) and how they eat. They all have some sort of legumes (beans, peas etc.) and starches (grains, tubers etc.) at the bottom of their pyramid, making up the base, being what they eat the most of. Fibrous veggies too this and it makes for their slow digestion which means slow absorption into the bloodstream. Same thing for the tofu and cheese and their bits of meat.
![I.N "HALLUCINATION" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/n5B5q1Hwt_U/mqdefault.jpg)
What do you think about the raw till 4 diet? It's a fruit based low fat vegan diet. (It's basically raw fruits and vegetables throughout the day, and one meal of cooked starches for dinner.)
I take Deva vegan Omega 3 DHA EPA
Please make a video on extreme atopic dermatitis (eczema) and its effects with food.
Dr Mcdougall talks about it on his website Dr Mcdougall dot com. Under the topic of allergic reactions to food. Here's the link www.drmcdougall.com/education/common-health-problems/allergic-reactions-to-food/?_gl=1*1llblkg*_ga*MTQ1OTEwMTcyMy4xNzM2MDMzNjAw*_ga_M3W192WV0Q*MTczNjAzMzU5OS4xLjEuMTczNjAzMzYwNS41NC4wLjA.
Question: What if diet A is 10 % fat and B is 25 % fat but diet A is 4000 kcal while B is 1600 kcal? Assuming that both are eaten neither above nor under TDEE (total daily energy expenditure), which one is better and why? After all, A and B each have 400 kcal from fat.
I'd guess that A is better, because B would indicate a sedentary lifestyle, while A involves physical exercise, otherwise they are similar.
This leads to an interesting inquiry, at least to me but I think also for others who have similar TDEEs, because I have a TDEE of around 4 Mcal (= 4000 kcal) and I don't know yet where I am currently at fatwise, I'd have to track it and put into the computer to say, but say I'd be still at 30%, that would mean I'd get 1200 kcal from fats or circa 130 grams of dietary fat. Now this would be the same amount of fat as a 75% fat diet @1600 kcal, so basically sedentary keto women or keto guys aiming for weight loss. Given this, I'll probably set the goal at around < 15 % fat or below 66 grams of fat or something in that ballpark.
Ok, there seems to be a reasoning error in my guess because the flow, what gets into the bloodstream, is proportionally or in its composition different. The composition would be derived and in that sense based on 10% fat vs. 25% fat, and for the other examples 30% vs 75%. So A and B are dissimilar and my guess is that diet A is better than diet B because 1) diet B indicates a sedentary lifestyle and diet A a physically active one and 2) 10% fat intake seems to be in many cases better than a 25% fat intake.
Also, I can't really imagine thick and slow blood to have a good passage. I mean it would be dense but dense like a sludge without the tension or compactness like say a fast river. On the other hand, you'd also not wanna have a large bursting river shooting through the eye of a needle. So it starts to make clear sense to me that you wanna have wide, non-constricted blood vessels and a certain blood viscosity that fairs wells neither too thick nor too thin, although generally thin would be better, I guess.
Also, the starch-based stuff makes a lot of sense to me. I mean, one has just to look at the blue zones (or healthy elders in general) and how they eat. They all have some sort of legumes (beans, peas etc.) and starches (grains, tubers etc.) at the bottom of their pyramid, making up the base, being what they eat the most of. Fibrous veggies too this and it makes for their slow digestion which means slow absorption into the bloodstream. Same thing for the tofu and cheese and their bits of meat.
He lived up to 77, not that impressive.