London belly dancer hire samba dancer wedding entertainment Sandrine he says it each time to steal time away from the Senators. It’s a stonewall tactic that guilty people use to try to wiggle out of trouble.
Hmmm its almost as if your talking to a high ranking official that you should address them by their high ranking title. Its like saying "OMG He addresses his physician with doctor so often!"
That's easy: the left. The real problem is defining what the left is, because it's a variable concept. For instance, Nancy Pelosi used to proudly represent that political spectrum, but she's recently mutated into a racist enemy of progress.
Nobody with the right to do so that's forsure. Liberals ask for examples and proof. I cite. The first amendment. It is that simple. Just because they are platforms does not mean they don't actively engage in the regulation of what people say via banning for any reason they see fit. That should be done by an entity detached from the platform if that's what it claims to be. Platforms are platforms for information and ideas, not an organization to control what goes on and what is said within the platform. The platform is supposed to maintain its service. That's it. Yet the leftists still cite Zuckerberg saying "we don't ask anyone about their political leanings" and "we only ban terrorist propaganda". I wasn't made aware that republican support and rage for their opposition was any closer to terrorism than the mirrored words and actions of the left on the very platform that facebook is. It bleeds bias. Yet legally there is none because they don't ask anyone their political affiliation upon hiring? Haha. You don't need to ask a Democrat if if they're a Democrat directly. Nor do you need to do so with a republican. Any hiring manager or anyone who's good taking hints would agree. I will say one thing. Zuckerberg is very smart in not admitting to his crimes with smooth talk. If only the right was as good at playing dumb/neutral/victim.
Philipp questions were stupid, he tried to answer stupid questions with intelligent answers but as the senators understand nothing about companies like this they cut him off
@@jckk672 I was referring to the questions he just didn't want to answer in that wording since they paint a picture thus he just doeged them by trying to "explain" other things in relation to that first which would lighten the picture. But that's basically how this "game" works. And yes most of these people asked stupid questions
This is complex. Zuckerbeg was trying to avoid some sensitive aspects when all he needed to answer was just Yes or No. When the senators lost patience it is understandable they wanted to interrupt him. Also I think it is kind of a technique to put some pressure on him by controlling the conversation.
apparently he was on track to be one of the most successful lawyers in history and on track to be a supreme court justice. and then became a politician.
It's not his place to deviate from the question and expand on the topic. When asked a question, his job is to answer that question directly and honestly. That's how the legal system works
@@gangulisomeshchandra fox and Alex Jones do push there opinions a bit, I've even hurd them change a story slightly, and honestly I have a bit of a problem with it but there truthful. info wars is a little crazy but that guy knows what he is talking about, I've watched things I thought he was just going off the deep end a bit actually unfold exactly how he explained it lol. but neither of them are lieng to ya the rest are straight up lieng. they take snips and clips of full shows and twist it and most of it is lies. most of us caught them in the lies then they try to flip it an say there lieng lol it's on video lol. you can tell the rest of these stations are backing CNN by the way they explain what's going on and there titles. the biggest thing is were all being censored now since Trump you see it on Google you have to personally change your news or you will see nothing but democratic news and RUclips removed Republican shows, viewers and censored them in order to not get blasted with fake news you have to find real news like fox an info wars click the bell, subscribe and change the upload date to today to get what you want in your live feed lol it's so obvious and they think we're stupid there on national t. v. and we all have watched this unfold check out mark zukerburg in court with FB, check out Google and it's managers in court that was even censored because they didn't want you to know they were in court some of us seen it but alot didn't because there censored lol
@@gangulisomeshchandra if they say collusion we can't have relations that's not good, they want Trump to go to war so they can say he is a war mongeral and it will drive us into the dirt, at the same time wile our troops are out we can be hit hard by another country
I hope so and maybe he can take over Canada too so we can all be free. The True north Strong and Free, and the Home of the Free and Land of the Brave. Kick out all foreigners who love their land more than the land they live in. Sound like a good plan to you?
Wrong video bro. Cruz has full knowledge of Zuck’s responses. He literally expanding on his original question. There’s nothing that was misunderstood...
This is not the question. Pad pride, internet pride, computer expertise pride, whatever. There is a reason for him to be here and the senators know it.
Mark has been witness coached too well. His lawyers have coached so well that he wastes the time restraint that senators have and gives no new information
Good questions. Defining hate speech is subjective, and more importantly could change from day to day. What is not considered hate speech today could in fact be in 10 years. And honestly this isnt a left or right issue as both sides should be concerned about this.
Hate speech is only subjective to those who project it and try to defend their prejudices as 'free speech'. Is what's being said attacking, dehumanizing, degrading, or harassing any person(s), groups, or minorities? Does it use abusive, dishonest/deceitful propaganda, belittling, or hateful rhetoric? Or, on the other side of things, does it promote one group as superior, genetically pure, etc as all others? (ie the aryan race). If that's too complicated, dumb it down to: live your own life and don't be an asshole.
Naomi Collinson Hate Speech is when someone threatens or advocates violence against someone else, like what groups like ISIS or ANTIFA do. Hate speech is not making fun or criticizing someone, that is free speech.
Hate speech is subjective in nature. Your definition of what constitutes hate speech might be different than mine. People are worried about how an ideology or sub-culture could silence the voice of the majority. This is a step down the road to censorship and free speech rights taken away from the individual. Isn't this what the Nazis did to their people? Why would we want this here?
Balance and common sense is what's needed. Like giving people power/authority, sure they can have it but they shouldn't be free from facing the consequences for misusing and/or abusing it. Allowing open season free speech without conscience or consequence is what gives hate groups, like nazi-wannabes, their platform and influence. By standing by, doing or saying nothing while citing "but it's their free speech" is what enables and empowers them. Drawing a line and saying there are limits and consequences for those who abuse their rights to harm others, allows a civilized and intelligent society to keep hate groups, like nazi-wannabes, in check and prevent that kind of scenario. Saying hate speech is subjective and my definition may be different than yours is like saying assault is subjective and your definition may vary. Assault: physical contact which harms another. Hate Speech: speech (verbal, written, other) which harms and/or dehumanizes a marginalized group or minority. Hate speech is not free speech. There is no cutting hairs when it comes to persecuting and harming others. Other countries, like Canada, do not have a 1st Amendment yet citizens still have a voice. Inciting violence, threatening to murder someone is not protected as free speech. Is that not censorship by your definition? Or do you agree that there should also be a common sense line drawn with reasonable consequence? Just as there is for inciting violence or uttering threats.
Bad question. As Cruz puts it, time is a sensitive matter, and that is a broad-subjective fkn question that can go on for hours. The committee needs to ask valuable questions about Facebooks private and public online security and how it can change. Zuckerberg isn't the google search bar.
You're comment is based on other comments you've read in post. Think about what Ted Cruz is asking, he's asking does Facebook censor right wing content, he completely understands what he's asking. It sounds like you don't, but you still wanted to make a comment so you copied what everyone was saying from other videos.
@@TheCabbageMan Because Ted Cruz has no idea what he's talking about and expects simple answers to complicated questions, the idiot doesn't even understand that his questions are even complicated
A lot of things are beyond you if this is. One must be very careful while answering Congress because if any statement they make can be found untrue or false they can get a hefty fine and even a prison sentence for perjury. Hence all testifiers ignore straight answers to questions related to the intricacies of law without consulting legal counsel. I know this and I'm not even American. Dumbass
As a liberal im not particulary fond of Tom Cruz's politcs, although honestly im dont know all that much about him. But he touched on some very important topics involving free speech here, and did so in a very intelligent manner.
@Martin Pedersen - So you don't know much at all about him but you know you're not fond of his politics....so in other words you're a tribal Liberal with a capital L who blindly supports whatever your tribe tells you to support and blindly opposes whatever your tribe tells you to oppose without question. Good to know.
Lmao he keeps reexplaining the SAME thing over and over, never answering the specific question. He is CLEARLY trying to waste his time, good tactic, I would use it if I know I was fucking being exposed.
The "conservative content" he is referring to is the memes of people running over protesters. That is encouraging violence and is in violation of their terms of service. Saying facebook taking down a person's post that encourages MURDER is censorship is outright lunacy.
The simple truth?Social media is the worst thing that has happened to humanity.Users are arguing over every topic you can think of,name calling and bullying is an everyday occurrence.Narcissism is the norm of users and animosity’s and hatred is the by product.That is not healthy for society.
They’re just trying to make him look like the bad guy, in reality the gov is listening to everything you say through your phone and with your phone nearby but nobody has a problem with that cause it doesnt effect the ads you see on your damn phone
"senator here's what we think about this: Facebook is a platform of our biased ideas , if someone's idea doesn't go down our throats too well, we'll label it 'unsafe' to the community." RIP freedom of expression - hypocrisy
I think most people agree that we don't want to see terrorist bombings and violent videos of people dying. Lmao you're a fucking idiot. Policy rules of a website have existed since aol chat rooms days.
He never even began answering the questions. He was rambling on trying to waste time so Cruz runs out. Cruz has to keep clarifying because Zuckerbetg was dancing around the actual questions
Do you consider yourself a neutral public form or do you engage in political speech yes or no? Mark: Well senator! To many Americans that seems to be a pervasive pattern of political bias now do you agree with that yes or no? Mark: Senator let me say a few things about this!
I think the fact that Mark has no chance of knowing it was possibly the point he planned to arrive at; maybe kind of like asking questions you know what the answers to will be but nonetheless being able to support an important point with those answers. the fact that Mark can't know is possibly suggestive that his company could be rife in areas with people pushing political bias in an undercover fashion. it might be at the point where Facebook is tainted with employees who have been corrupted by some external organisation; maybe Facebook should even audit its own employees
@@Johnny-Joseph it was a multiple choice question. Very simple. Mark also said very simple things, but for as long as possible. Running out the clock. That's it. And everyone in the room knew it, too. The only person's head this went over was yours.
@@Johnny-Joseph Again, it was multiple choice, not yes or no. Super simple. Is facebook politically biased, or a neutral forum? You may have missed it the first time, and you MIGHT catch it if you watch it again? They say third time's a charm...
Long Gray Line he’s not nerves. He only had 30 seconds to answer the questions and he’s a very smart young man, carefully selecting appropriate words for the questions.
Zuckerberg is extremely intelligent. Everyone in the room knows that he will be outdone by some senator. If anything, Zuckerberg’s expressions come from the his frustration of the pervasive nature of the questions he is being asked.
benicecunt o.k. Language like yours is the way I live for 40 years with a creep who didn’t care about anybody except himself so you can take your language and put it right where you spoke it have a good night sir
That "spme reason" is Facebook, and all media's political biases. Cmon..were all grown ups here. The world wants Conservatism outlawed..but too PC to SAY that. Actions scream though.
The only reason why they don’t understand his answers is cause they don’t understand their own questions. He is answering what they are asking but due to the lack of knowledge that they have of modern tech, they don’t get either sides of the equation
if Mark had answered the first question, (which he didn't) as to wether fb was a neutral platform or not, and said it was neutral, then the question would be inappropriate. However, as fb continually censors with bias, it's entirely valid. Try to keep up. It's not ok to be stupid.
1st question part b is a trick question. does FB support the 1st amendment or are they a neutral public forum ? do you want section 230 immunity or do you embrace your 1st ammendment right as a company.... anyway, they are not neutral :(
The real story is the lack of awareness/insight the senators had and the shallow/brief questions that occurred. They would have been better off with a handful of competent experts asking the questions rather than giving everyone a shot for a couple of moments. They were so caught up with time constraints that when they finally cornered Mark into a corner where he needed to contemplate a response, time was up and the issues changed with next examiner. On another point, they looked star struck to have the opportunity to speak to Mark. He was so comfortable in his answers and this is due to the style of the enquiry. This was a strong sign that tech companies will always be so far ahead of law makers that they will reign supreme at all times. The process was concerning and congress has as much to answer for in relation to the poor examination as Mark under oath as does FB itself.
This guy must have said senator 300 times in the whole trial.
London belly dancer hire samba dancer wedding entertainment Sandrine he says it each time to steal time away from the Senators. It’s a stonewall tactic that guilty people use to try to wiggle out of trouble.
Lol how else are you suppose to address them
its almost like hes talking to senators
THANK YOU! I thought I was the only one annoyed by that :D
Hmmm its almost as if your talking to a high ranking official that you should address them by their high ranking title. Its like saying "OMG He addresses his physician with doctor so often!"
Problem is who defines hate speech
That's easy: the left. The real problem is defining what the left is, because it's a variable concept. For instance, Nancy Pelosi used to proudly represent that political spectrum, but she's recently mutated into a racist enemy of progress.
Democrates and left They themselve told.
Democrates and left They themselve told.
Left. Never once did conservatives bring up hate speech so as to silence liberals.
Nobody with the right to do so that's forsure. Liberals ask for examples and proof. I cite. The first amendment. It is that simple. Just because they are platforms does not mean they don't actively engage in the regulation of what people say via banning for any reason they see fit. That should be done by an entity detached from the platform if that's what it claims to be. Platforms are platforms for information and ideas, not an organization to control what goes on and what is said within the platform. The platform is supposed to maintain its service. That's it. Yet the leftists still cite Zuckerberg saying "we don't ask anyone about their political leanings" and "we only ban terrorist propaganda". I wasn't made aware that republican support and rage for their opposition was any closer to terrorism than the mirrored words and actions of the left on the very platform that facebook is. It bleeds bias. Yet legally there is none because they don't ask anyone their political affiliation upon hiring? Haha. You don't need to ask a Democrat if if they're a Democrat directly. Nor do you need to do so with a republican. Any hiring manager or anyone who's good taking hints would agree. I will say one thing. Zuckerberg is very smart in not admitting to his crimes with smooth talk. If only the right was as good at playing dumb/neutral/victim.
Mission Impossible: How many times was he allowed to complete his sentence
Bahram Khan -2
He was trying to doge the questions quite some times, that being sad he shouldn’t have interrupted him all the time
Philipp questions were stupid, he tried to answer stupid questions with intelligent answers but as the senators understand nothing about companies like this they cut him off
@@jckk672 I was referring to the questions he just didn't want to answer in that wording since they paint a picture thus he just doeged them by trying to "explain" other things in relation to that first which would lighten the picture. But that's basically how this "game" works. And yes most of these people asked stupid questions
This is complex. Zuckerbeg was trying to avoid some sensitive aspects when all he needed to answer was just Yes or No. When the senators lost patience it is understandable they wanted to interrupt him. Also I think it is kind of a technique to put some pressure on him by controlling the conversation.
Ted Cruz is literally the only person that sounded like he knew what he was talking about...
exept he should know that he would not know the orientation from working people.
He is really smart!
Hawley did a damn good job!
the lying Ted? as Trump put it. Watch Trump vs Cruz on youtube
he's the only one who finished a sentence
Was Ted a lawyer? His questioning skills are tough!
Nice-oscar good call. I looked it up. He was indeed a lawyer.
Yes, Cruz was one of the legal team that won the Heller gun rights case before the supreme court.
apparently he was on track to be one of the most successful lawyers in history and on track to be a supreme court justice. and then became a politician.
He was a partner at Fruitcake and Fruitcake.
He also taught law at UT Austin apparently.
When is Congress going to ask this question to RUclips?!?...😂
Good news. One year later it happened :) google to be more specific
Google owns RUclips
Fucking factss😭😍😂😂
FOR REAL¡!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why should they?
Zuckerburg: “yeah so the reason is-
Senator: next question
When they do not want to hear the answer.
Logan Paul: NEXT QUESTION
*Zuckerberg
Viper Platinum it’s because he was just spitting bullshit to avoid the question
It's not his place to deviate from the question and expand on the topic. When asked a question, his job is to answer that question directly and honestly. That's how the legal system works
Zuck sounds like a 6 year old being interrogated by their parents 😭😭
Truck driver dad: "Son I need to have a word with you."
6 yr old Son: "Senator, I firmly believe . . ."
Truck driver dad: " . . . "
Sounds like Zuckerberg doesn't know shit.
Yes. He is so idiot that I cannot imagine.
@@RobertLofrano he’s probably a brilliant actor.
SCRIPT READING WIND UP PUPPET! DOES NOT OWN FACEBOOK!
ZUCK: \scripts\human\motion\liberal\deny.bin
fukin windows
*Mad NPC face*
Quick_Tech_Reviews\scripts\human\pleasure\Jerk_Off_Infornt_To_Reflection.pl
Liberal? Are you fucking kidding me, have you seen the ads he let run? What the fuck.
@@jaxonklaus838 yeah? Compared to the left "leaning" SHIT?
I was waiting for Zuckerberg to go dead silent starring at Cruz, do a 180 turn, and make a sprint out of the room.
blackenedchrome he would need to be programmed to do that
W
@@galaxy-wy9sd L
@@GabrielConstantinides Negro
the owner of CNN needs to be investigated like this, along with any major media company about misleading lies
What about Fox News?
@@gangulisomeshchandra fox and Alex Jones do push there opinions a bit, I've even hurd them change a story slightly, and honestly I have a bit of a problem with it but there truthful. info wars is a little crazy but that guy knows what he is talking about, I've watched things I thought he was just going off the deep end a bit actually unfold exactly how he explained it lol. but neither of them are lieng to ya the rest are straight up lieng. they take snips and clips of full shows and twist it and most of it is lies. most of us caught them in the lies then they try to flip it an say there lieng lol it's on video lol. you can tell the rest of these stations are backing CNN by the way they explain what's going on and there titles. the biggest thing is were all being censored now since Trump you see it on Google you have to personally change your news or you will see nothing but democratic news and RUclips removed Republican shows, viewers and censored them in order to not get blasted with fake news you have to find real news like fox an info wars click the bell, subscribe and change the upload date to today to get what you want in your live feed lol it's so obvious and they think we're stupid there on national t. v. and we all have watched this unfold check out mark zukerburg in court with FB, check out Google and it's managers in court that was even censored because they didn't want you to know they were in court some of us seen it but alot didn't because there censored lol
@@gangulisomeshchandra just like they say collusion every time we try to have relations
@@gangulisomeshchandra if they say collusion we can't have relations that's not good, they want Trump to go to war so they can say he is a war mongeral and it will drive us into the dirt, at the same time wile our troops are out we can be hit hard by another country
@@mrj24811 Info war a little crazy?
Great job Sen. Cruz very impressive 👍🏼
Detective Cruz/20
Dark Ren Cruz is a shit show
Dark Ren boom. 200 likes.
Dark Ren mythology
Dark Ren future president
I hope so and maybe he can take over Canada too so we can all be free. The True north Strong and Free, and the Home of the Free and Land of the Brave. Kick out all foreigners who love their land more than the land they live in. Sound like a good plan to you?
Zodiac vs lizard
(Edit: OMG 579 likes THANKS)
brandon crespo lol
brandon crespo I
Sandy Lee I see what you did there
Kevin from The Office*
“Let me just re-explain for time”
Interrupting him is only going to take up more time.
Not if he’s deflecting the question it won’t.
You’re wrong. Mark was avoiding each question to the best of his ability
He’s doing that cuz zucc is not answering his question
Are you stupid? Hes saying let me make it clearer so you can answer the question instead of rambling
"We're a platform for all ideas, as long as they align with ours."
True
Except an awful lot of right-wing pages exist and are doing great on Facebook
Wow. What an ignorant statement that is !
Ted Cruz: Do you have technology to detect lizard people?
Zuckerberg: No.
Ted Cruz: Good.
bartonfang
...then Ted scurries up a wall and licks his own eyeball...
I like how he called him Suckerberg all the time lol
bartonfang 🤣
bartonfang he does, but he is on the lizard people's side. You can only see them through special sunglasses that google made.
Me: Are you a fucking idiot? bartonfang: I love spaghetti.
It's like trying to explain to ur grandma how to use an I pad
BallisticCatz The first one is harder
Wrong video bro. Cruz has full knowledge of Zuck’s responses. He literally expanding on his original question. There’s nothing that was misunderstood...
Erm, no this was a nicely conducted Q&A with clear questions and clear responses. I think maybe you just didn’t care you listen to them at all?
its crazy to me that the people who have NO CLUE about todays society and technology are the ones making decisions for all of us
This is not the question. Pad pride, internet pride, computer expertise pride, whatever. There is a reason for him to be here and the senators know it.
Mark has been witness coached too well. His lawyers have coached so well that he wastes the time restraint that senators have and gives no new information
It’s not coaching. He’s an extremely intelligent man
@@ivana4638 search up , what is a photocopier . It is a similar sort of thing
At what point was he allowed to give new information? The questions were all a rhetorical trap anyway.
SCRIPT READING WIND UP PUPPET! DOES NOT OWN FACEBOOK!
The Z U C C literally does not have emotion. It’s so strange the way he keeps saying senator in every other sentence.
I believe you have to do that.
Who Am I? That’s a legal thing, a lot of ppl do it
It’s a respect thing it would be weird if he didn’t
Good questions. Defining hate speech is subjective, and more importantly could change from day to day. What is not considered hate speech today could in fact be in 10 years. And honestly this isnt a left or right issue as both sides should be concerned about this.
Hate speech is only subjective to those who project it and try to defend their prejudices as 'free speech'. Is what's being said attacking, dehumanizing, degrading, or harassing any person(s), groups, or minorities? Does it use abusive, dishonest/deceitful propaganda, belittling, or hateful rhetoric? Or, on the other side of things, does it promote one group as superior, genetically pure, etc as all others? (ie the aryan race).
If that's too complicated, dumb it down to: live your own life and don't be an asshole.
Naomi Collinson Hate Speech is when someone threatens or advocates violence against someone else, like what groups like ISIS or ANTIFA do. Hate speech is not making fun or criticizing someone, that is free speech.
Hate speech is subjective in nature. Your definition of what constitutes hate speech might be different than mine. People are worried about how an ideology or sub-culture could silence the voice of the majority. This is a step down the road to censorship and free speech rights taken away from the individual. Isn't this what the Nazis did to their people? Why would we want this here?
Balance and common sense is what's needed. Like giving people power/authority, sure they can have it but they shouldn't be free from facing the consequences for misusing and/or abusing it. Allowing open season free speech without conscience or consequence is what gives hate groups, like nazi-wannabes, their platform and influence. By standing by, doing or saying nothing while citing "but it's their free speech" is what enables and empowers them. Drawing a line and saying there are limits and consequences for those who abuse their rights to harm others, allows a civilized and intelligent society to keep hate groups, like nazi-wannabes, in check and prevent that kind of scenario.
Saying hate speech is subjective and my definition may be different than yours is like saying assault is subjective and your definition may vary. Assault: physical contact which harms another. Hate Speech: speech (verbal, written, other) which harms and/or dehumanizes a marginalized group or minority. Hate speech is not free speech. There is no cutting hairs when it comes to persecuting and harming others. Other countries, like Canada, do not have a 1st Amendment yet citizens still have a voice.
Inciting violence, threatening to murder someone is not protected as free speech. Is that not censorship by your definition? Or do you agree that there should also be a common sense line drawn with reasonable consequence? Just as there is for inciting violence or uttering threats.
Bad question. As Cruz puts it, time is a sensitive matter, and that is a broad-subjective fkn question that can go on for hours. The committee needs to ask valuable questions about Facebooks private and public online security and how it can change. Zuckerberg isn't the google search bar.
They’re just asking things they don’t even understand.
I mean what's not to understand. It is blatently obvious that Facebook engages in censorship that doesn't fit their arbitrary narrative.
You're comment is based on other comments you've read in post. Think about what Ted Cruz is asking, he's asking does Facebook censor right wing content, he completely understands what he's asking. It sounds like you don't, but you still wanted to make a comment so you copied what everyone was saying from other videos.
^ this guy said it best
@@MrWhoareyou1221beautiful. Smack these stupid little kids down, man. Just beautiful.
Kyle Parker like fox news ?
If he says no he has lied under oath
Zucc: midway through sentence
Senator: nOw LeT mE aSk YoU tHiS
Because the zucc is swerving and dodging everytime he speaks, except he sounds like a 7th grader trying to debate the civil war, he's a fucking lizard
@@TheCabbageMan Because Ted Cruz has no idea what he's talking about and expects simple answers to complicated questions, the idiot doesn't even understand that his questions are even complicated
Suck My Duck they are yes or no questions
@@domthebomb2649 to a bunch of senile old men yes they are yes or no questions.
The Social Network 2
LA Knight The social network 2: The fall of Zuckerberg
Gentlemen Gamer The Social Network 2: Electric Boogaloo
Kārlis Kokorevičs lol
"I stole Facebook, but trust me , I would never steal your stuff."
jamie mccrummen he doesn't need to do shit. Facebook has paid shit ton of money to every mother fucker in the panel from the last 5 years.
Good one Jamie, you are 100% correct. Zuckerberg should hold his head in shame.
Yeah, Mark totally stole the idea .. from .. himself ....
2:36 you can hear his lizard tail wack the mic
Bahahahhqhqhqhha
We all know what he is
@@menschlicherroboter6791exactly, 100%.
How this guy is keeping himself from yelling "ANSWER ME, MOTHERFUCKER!" is beyond me.
A lot of things are beyond you if this is. One must be very careful while answering Congress because if any statement they make can be found untrue or false they can get a hefty fine and even a prison sentence for perjury. Hence all testifiers ignore straight answers to questions related to the intricacies of law without consulting legal counsel.
I know this and I'm not even American. Dumbass
Don't say anything mean to Satagni or he'll go crying to the mods to have your comment removed or astroturfed. Cause he's an arrogant prat. : )
@@BunneRabb What even is that response lmfao
@@mazzar2739 a comment that, like any pussy troll, he deleted. Z0mgloolomgwtfhawbbq.
Go get an education and a brain if possible
As a liberal im not particulary fond of Tom Cruz's politcs, although honestly im dont know all that much about him. But he touched on some very important topics involving free speech here, and did so in a very intelligent manner.
Legenden lmao Tom cruise 😂😂
😂😂😂 Didn't see that first.
you mean as a lib you're not fond of things that are right for the country.
@Martin Pedersen - So you don't know much at all about him but you know you're not fond of his politics....so in other words you're a tribal Liberal with a capital L who blindly supports whatever your tribe tells you to support and blindly opposes whatever your tribe tells you to oppose without question. Good to know.
Janči ForceAlpha be quiet globalist 🐑
The irony of watching this on the CNN page.
74 million Americans think Facebook is guilty of suppressing republican opinions, stories, etc!!! They need to be held accountable.
And Zuckerberg $500m donation to the dems kind of proves that all 74m are correct
they just dont let him talk
i mean they are doing an interrogation of sorts and trying to baffle him as much as they can. I think it’s a tactic they use.
regardless of what you think, they do it with the concern for time. so events like these don't take weeks to finish
@@420f37 but he could at least explain what he is talking about
Lmao he keeps reexplaining the SAME thing over and over, never answering the specific question. He is CLEARLY trying to waste his time, good tactic, I would use it if I know I was fucking being exposed.
Zodiac destroyed lizard with fact and logic
Here we see two reptilians competing to try and appear more human than each other
OutOfNamesToChoose Ted Cruz has had more time in his meat suit. That’s an unfair advantage.
🤣🤣
FB is the biggest liar of them all
Ted Cruz: Mr Zuckerberg I'm going to ask you a 5 sentence personal question.."
Zuckerberg: " This day could be your last"...
I'm not even Zuckerbeg but I feel attacked right now in my bed wow.
Axel Crime that's cuz your stupid , go cry in your safe space
Dainier Garcia If only you knew what that word means...
Axel Crime wow you really need some help man.
Well when your selling millions of people’s private information to the highest bidder you shouldn’t exactly feel good about you self
That’s the point dumbass!!!! Find your safe space
Go for it Senator Cruz 👍👍👍👍
This is proof that Ted Cruz isn't always an idiot.
Ted, it's your boss , the mercers , that stole the Facebook data ,
Ohhhh, zuck answers well but he is no poker player! Liar is written ALL OVER his face!🤣🤣🤣
Well, I hate to tell you, Mark, but you’re FAILING at making FB a fair & unbiased platform for all people to use.
DOES NOT OWN FACEBOOK! THESE ARE ALL LIES!
Oh well...don't use it then
I deleted my facebook account and it feels ..... GOOD!
I do not need that bias platform.
Guido Schalckens me too
@@somedude3349 lol
Facebook is not a safe space. Snowflakes beware.
Me toooooo xxx
You might be the dumbest person alive, and you are the reason no one takes America and new technology seriously
That feel when you might have not realized how influential your service has become
My respect level for Mr Cruz has risen to a very high level with this exchange ,he was well prepared and spot on
I've heard of Alien vs. Predator, but this Zodiac Killer vs. Reptilian Overlord trailer got me *SHOOK*
Ted Cruz: "Why people hate me on all media, including Faux News? Is it due to politician bias or it is just me"?
zukerberg looks angry and sad
The "conservative content" he is referring to is the memes of people running over protesters. That is encouraging violence and is in violation of their terms of service. Saying facebook taking down a person's post that encourages MURDER is censorship is outright lunacy.
The simple truth?Social media is the worst thing that has happened to humanity.Users are arguing over every topic you can think of,name calling and bullying is an everyday occurrence.Narcissism is the norm of users and animosity’s and hatred is the by product.That is not healthy for society.
They’re just trying to make him look like the bad guy, in reality the gov is listening to everything you say through your phone and with your phone nearby but nobody has a problem with that cause it doesnt effect the ads you see on your damn phone
this is why we love ted cruz
"senator here's what we think about this: Facebook is a platform of our biased ideas , if someone's idea doesn't go down our throats too well, we'll label it 'unsafe' to the community." RIP freedom of expression - hypocrisy
I think most people agree that we don't want to see terrorist bombings and violent videos of people dying. Lmao you're a fucking idiot.
Policy rules of a website have existed since aol chat rooms days.
That man has patience.. Its highly frustrating when they just cut him off and don't let him explain
He never even began answering the questions. He was rambling on trying to waste time so Cruz runs out. Cruz has to keep clarifying because Zuckerbetg was dancing around the actual questions
You must love the taste of BS.
I said bye bye to fb this year. I feel free!!!!!!! I will NEVER GO BACK. #DumpFacebook
no one cared about you then and no one cares about you now
Deivydas Staliulionis I care
@@BMG12366two we didn't ask mate
Lemme Guess, ur using Twitter now
@@theman3758 ?
So Cruz is going to pretend he cares about the issue when he used this Cambridge Analitica.
*Mark tries to speak*
Senetors: I aM tHe SeNaTe
Imagine getting questioned in a court and only answering questions with statements!! Ted is the best!!!
GUILTY GUILTY GUILTY as the gavel comes down!!
Do you consider yourself a neutral public form or do you engage in political speech yes or no?
Mark: Well senator!
To many Americans that seems to be a pervasive pattern of political bias now do you agree with that yes or no?
Mark: Senator let me say a few things about this!
Asking him specific questions about 15 - 20,000 employees is like expecting the president to know every foreign leader on a personal level
I think the fact that Mark has no chance of knowing it was possibly the point he planned to arrive at; maybe kind of like asking questions you know what the answers to will be but nonetheless being able to support an important point with those answers. the fact that Mark can't know is possibly suggestive that his company could be rife in areas with people pushing political bias in an undercover fashion. it might be at the point where Facebook is tainted with employees who have been corrupted by some external organisation; maybe Facebook should even audit its own employees
This is halarious! I love cruz
Thank you senetor cruz
He is so smart by playing time.Well played zuck
It's not playing for time, it's being more intelligent than anyone else in the room. 2+2 is not a yes or no question.
@@Johnny-Joseph it was a multiple choice question. Very simple. Mark also said very simple things, but for as long as possible. Running out the clock. That's it. And everyone in the room knew it, too. The only person's head this went over was yours.
@@misterfitzgerald Oh cutey, you think those are yes or no questions. How adorable
@@Johnny-Joseph Again, it was multiple choice, not yes or no. Super simple. Is facebook politically biased, or a neutral forum? You may have missed it the first time, and you MIGHT catch it if you watch it again? They say third time's a charm...
@@misterfitzgerald You're so cute babe, you'll understand one day :)
Remember people this is the same Senator that trumpf bashed and nicknamed "Lying Ted"
Cuz he lied
Suckerberg looks like he is about to lose his bowels from nervousness.
Long Gray Line he’s not nerves. He only had 30 seconds to answer the questions and he’s a very smart young man, carefully selecting appropriate words for the questions.
Zuckerberg is extremely intelligent. Everyone in the room knows that he will be outdone by some senator. If anything, Zuckerberg’s expressions come from the his frustration of the pervasive nature of the questions he is being asked.
Has billions of dollars and yet his hair cut looks like one of those terrible home haircuts your mom gave you as a kid.
It's all about priorities. The flyest looking people i know are broke, some live in their mama's house
Mine looked like Jim Carey dooo in dumb and dumber!!!
mine look like rambo 3
I had the Hitler doo without the beard
No wonder you are not near as rich as he is, since you spend most of your life styling your hair as a preference.
I dumped Facebook several weeks ago..done and done
I’m only on Facebook for my family to know what’s going on in their lives I could care less about all the other crud
benicecunt o.k. Language like yours is the way I live for 40 years with a creep who didn’t care about anybody except himself so you can take your language and put it right where you spoke it have a good night sir
Why didn't he answer the question about Diamond and Silk?
Karl Kohlhase because he already knows. The look on both their faces. He knew sentor cruz knows he lie
That "spme reason" is Facebook, and all media's political biases. Cmon..were all grown ups here. The world wants Conservatism outlawed..but too PC to SAY that. Actions scream though.
Great Job Ted!! Keep it fair and honest. Facebook has become totally bias.
Ted Cruz has a point, and he's clearly done his homework
Is this ted Cruz’s attempt at staying relevant?
Brent Showers
I mean he’s a senator
This guy talks, looks, and behaves like an android.
Captain Red Rum At least not like Ted Cruz
More like a lizard .....
I swear I heard Ted Cruz say Mr. Suckerberg when the video started playing!!😂😂😂
Bravoooooo Ted Cruz............................ No to Fb censorship......................
Aaaaaand the Palestinian support pages are being blocked😒
They don’t even let him finish talking..
The only reason why they don’t understand his answers is cause they don’t understand their own questions. He is answering what they are asking but due to the lack of knowledge that they have of modern tech, they don’t get either sides of the equation
It's a simple question that even a 5 year old can answer. He didn't have to prevaricate around it.
Or perhaps Mark was just lying? The simplest answer is usually the correct one.
Go Ted!!!
Godbless u Mark!!!!
Cuban Canadian Cruz speaking in a southern accent
That is irrelevant to this topic!
In politics, everything, EVERYTHING, is fair game. You did know that, right?
Walter S. Yes, you are right. But what does that have to do with the topic at hand?
Formally Informal Nothing
mexican not a race. a nationality
That was actually a good question to ask.
First time I've seen zuckerburg not give a definite answer
3:20 his question is kind of concerning... it’s like he want all the companies to start asking people’s political orientation when they hiring.
This ted cruz kid would love that. I'm getting major creep vibes from him.
if Mark had answered the first question, (which he didn't) as to wether fb was a neutral platform or not, and said it was neutral, then the question would be inappropriate. However, as fb continually censors with bias, it's entirely valid. Try to keep up. It's not ok to be stupid.
Where’s the Phoenix Wright judge telling Cruz he didn’t find the contradiction in the testimony within 5 tries, so he gets a game over.
Way to to keep dodging the question Zuckerberg !!!
Put that punk out of business Senator Cruz and Graham! Thank you!
1st question part b is a trick question. does FB support the 1st amendment or are they a neutral public forum ? do you want section 230 immunity or do you embrace your 1st ammendment right as a company.... anyway, they are not neutral :(
Government: Facebook keeps Information of people
Also government: *Hold my beer*
CRUZ IS ON FIRE
Excellent questions 👍
Never really liked Cruz but I have respect for him for exposing the Zuck like that
Is Mr Zuckerberg always so nervous?
if you are a reptile amongst me you really oughta be scared
Wouldn't you be nervous infront of all of these specific people?
@@baldgaming6204 I'd need the Sargent at Arms to drag me in lol a televised political committee is my personal pit of pure nightmare fuel
Did anyone realise that Zuckerburg sounded like a programmed robot
Its disturbing that one Party can determine what is free speech and what isn't. period
How is nudity make people feel unsafe that's how they were born
@@hoang35356 well my wife can go flip it rember trump won not hilary
I'm really shocked that Zuckerberg is not wearing his Caesar inspired gold Laurel
@Tom H lol
The real story is the lack of awareness/insight the senators had and the shallow/brief questions that occurred. They would have been better off with a handful of competent experts asking the questions rather than giving everyone a shot for a couple of moments. They were so caught up with time constraints that when they finally cornered Mark into a corner where he needed to contemplate a response, time was up and the issues changed with next examiner.
On another point, they looked star struck to have the opportunity to speak to Mark. He was so comfortable in his answers and this is due to the style of the enquiry.
This was a strong sign that tech companies will always be so far ahead of law makers that they will reign supreme at all times. The process was concerning and congress has as much to answer for in relation to the poor examination as Mark under oath as does FB itself.
Is there Political Bias ?
Of course not, Senator.
Thank you for letting me investigate myself.
Is it me, or is mark Zuckerberg looking like an alien. or some sort of a robot. Weird
lol hahaha
For real tho. It seems like that. You never know
Not just you
@Trinder3467 sorry, god is real buddy.
Someone said in the comments.. Zuck looks like Data from Startrek!
Yess! I've been wondering for a while why he looks familiar! lol