VIKINGS Vs. Archaeology
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- Let's compare what we know from the reconstruction of archaeological sources with what we see in movies and television. Spoiler alert - there is a huge difference! :D Compare our historical and our movie viking! With commentary from our very own viking age archaeologist Philipp!
····················································································
Ihr wollt mehr von uns und wollt uns gleichzeitig unterstützen? Schaut auf Patreon vorbei und helft uns, damit wir euch weiter mit unseren Videos unterhalten können!
Patreon:
/ kaptorga
Spotify:
open.spotify.c...
Social Media:
/ kaptorgavisualhistory
/ kaptorga
/ kaptorga
Kontakt:
www.kaptorga.de
#Kaptorga #VisualHistory
And they say Germans don't have a sense of humour.
We don't. I am German I would know.
On the other hand it could be very deep sarcasm.
Germans dont have sense of humor, they have DATENSCHUTZ
and they say we don't have an accent at all 😁
I love the random 15th century plate spaulder on the """"""""""viking"""""""""".
:D This one is even 17th century! :D
Love your channel. You need to bring more english video like this so people Like me who watch you from Italy could understand. This deserve a like
So I saw the german version of this video, just a few hours ago.
Why is this one so different?
Even better.....more humorous! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Yeah i think the Same 🤣
"...I do crossfit!" XD
Wieder n cooles Video. Die gute Form von Edu-tainment!
On point, but to be fair: you really don't wanna do stunts in authentic Iron Age shoes.
Thats why there are original looking shoes with modern soles
Iron Age started around 2000 years earlier, and ended well before our Viking here. So whatever iron age shoes are, would be anachronistic (too old) for that viking anyway.
But yeah, nothing against modern soles for stuntmen, while retaining the original look of the shoes.
What a great video. I just found your chanel. Fantastic work.
Thank You! We will be doing more in english, there will be a premiere today at 14 GMT about our work as historical advisors on Barbarians.
@@KaptorgaVisualHistory It's saved in watch later since yesterday. Will be watching it when I get back home. Keep up the great work! I will be checking your videos from now on.
he looks a bit like Dysentery hit him from one of his Fellow "Vikings" with the Blood and Mud. not gonna lie but well the Show looks like Dysentery too so well..
Das ist ja noch "besser/garstiger" als die deutsche Version dieses Videos. Wie ein Unfall: Schrecklich, aber man muss immer wieder hinschauen ;)
Ich persönlich würde es ja bevorzugen, wenn man nicht immer nur die top ausgestatteten Krieger zeigt, sondern den normalen Kämpfer, welcher sich nun mal kein Schwert, Kettenhemd und noch ein Sax leisten konnte.
Wäre dann eine Axt, Langaxt, oder Speer. Zwei drei Wolltuniken und der Sachs, und Ein Leder "Helm". Rest wäre dann das gleiche.
Was noch fehlt ist ein Schild.
Lass den Lederhelm weg und ich bin bei dir.
Hart Leder Kappen oder "Helme" sind für einfache Krieger Belegt. Die Frage ist a der Zeitpunkt und b wie viele so einfach waren-.Aber Die Spangen waren Metall nur das dazwischen war Hartes Rinder Nackenleder.
Die Belege würden mich interessieren.
Nein. Das stimmt nicht.
Ubisoft hätte mal für Assassin's Creed Valhalla euer Video anschauen müssen.
Bitte analysiert den Trailer! :D
Hilarious! Because too, too true.
Hatten die Wikinger nur Kettenhemden als Rüstung oder auch Lederrüstungen?
Lederrüstungen sind nicht belegt und würden auch kaum Schutz bieten.
@@tubekulose Naja, wirklich dickes, gehärtetes Leder würde schon einen gewissen Schutz bieten, aber das Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis wäre einfach nicht gut. Schließlich brauchte es für eine Lederproduktion auch entsprechende Tierzucht und/oder Jagd. Leder wurde im Mittelalter vermutlich genutzt für Schuhe, Gürtel, Schwertscheiden, Pfeilköcher, Geldbörsen und ähnliches. Also für eher kleinere/ressourcenarme Dinge, die lange halten sollten und auch mal Wind und Wetter ausgesetzt waren. Aber keine Brustpanzer aus Leder oder sowas. Wenn du kein Kettenhemd hattest, kamst du mit ein paar Lagen mehr Stoff (z.B. in Form eines Gambesons) günstiger weg bei gleicher Schutzwirkung.
@@Kuhmuhnistische_Partei Dem stimme ich vollkommen zu.
@@Kuhmuhnistische_Partei Wobei auch Gambeson im Frühmittelalter Fantasy ist
Vikings Geopolitics
ruclips.net/video/kqTC6QE9Igs/видео.html
LOOL Turn shoes :-)
mud....more mud...lol
HAHAHA love it!!!
You forgoten to use a subsaharan african as a Viking.
Never saw a movie with a black viking. Maybe there is one, but it's not really a movie cliche. And... vikings got around a lot and had contact with many ethnicities. For example, it's known that they were in Morocco. That wouldn't be "subsaharan", but African people had their trades routes, too. So some people of subsaharan ancestry were probably there. Wouldn't be so unrealistic that some viking married a black women or they raided in Morocco and took slaves. Indeed, there is an archaeological found in York and there is evidence that one of the buried men had african ancestry. Or we can read some older historians, untouched by modern "political correctness" or something like that. In "A history of the Vikings" (1968) the author Gwen Jones writes:
"The viking peoples who lived between the neck of Jutland and the Lofotens, Sogn, and Uppsala, were not all alike, and emphatically not of one ‘pure’ nordic race. [...] But two main types of Scandinavian have always been recognizable: the one tall of stature, fair or ruddy complexioned, light-haired, blue-eyed, long of face and skull; the other shorter, dark-complexioned, brown- or dark-haired, brown-eyed, broad-face and round of skull.”
So a single black viking in a group wouldn't be unhistorical. It was rare, but absolutly a thing.
@@Kuhmuhnistische_Partei laughing while watching Vikins Valhalla with a black woman as Jarl Hakoon.
MUD
ROTFL
You forgott the padded jacket underneath the mail. Otherwise it wouldn‘t make much sense.
Of course mail makes sense on it´s own:
It turns a severed arm into a broken one, a deep, bleeding cut into a bruise and a superficial cut that could still cause bloodloss and/or infection into an "ouch!".
There actually aren´t all that much sources for padding under mail after the romans and before the mid 13th century.
And even after that, the depictions of mail over normal clothing vastly outnumber the depictions of mail over textile armor.
Textile and mail armor *were* combined in the late middle ages, just not nearly as often as people today believe.
There are even quite a few sources for wearing the textile armor *over* the mail.
no record of padded jackets/gambesons from the viking age, probably most just wore a few layers of woolen clothing underneath.
None for the Celts either
Forgot the helmet