model no.2 seems to be most accurate(as it follows theory of plate tectonics) because: N.America is moving away from Europe(simply-continuous expansion of Atlantic ocean) African rift valley(River Nile)will break Africa Indian plate is heading towards its NE Austrailan plate is moving towards North.
So far, the biggest convergent zone is western Pacific and the biggest divergent zone is the mid Atlantic. Only one of these seems to follow that, but faults may change Megaanna down the line. Also it'd be nice to pull Greenland and Antarctica closer to the equator
Some models theorize the Atlantic will expand and then contract as the oceanic shelf subducts under the continental shelf in either the Americas or Afro-Europe, creating a new convergent zone that eventually eliminates the Atlantic
Very cool. However, if we take into account chaos theory, the actual future Earth is basically close to impossible to be predicted accurately. There are countless of variables affecting the initial state of these tectonic plates on Earth itself, not to mention variables that come from outside of the Earth, such as asteroids, sun flares, etc.
closest to accurate prediction would be to add different variables to the basic model, like make one model based on simple cont drift without any outside factors, then add in various possibilities and see where that takes it, we could end up with hundreds or thousands of possible models and no way to know which one is correct but at least we'd know one is likely accurate.
In summary, all four describe a supercontinent composed of already established land masses, and the only significant difference is WHERE it will end up 250 million years from now. One forms in the Arctic, one forms in the Pacific, and two in the Atlantic with the difference between them being to which side Africa will go.
So the predictions are based on where existing continental landmasses are being shifted to? Do any of these factor in island or hell, continent formation from plate collisions and/or volcanic activity? Otherwise, its just a fun series of snipping, distorting, and rotating continental silhouettes into each other. Yay. I'd like to see the actual plates, otherwise this is just a game of remix and island deletion.
What if the Russian rift from Aurica, the Antarctic Rift and African Rift from Novopangea, and the North Pole centering from Amasia all occurred? What would that look like? (It's my headcanon, and I call it Ryperna.)
Some people don't recognize Afro-Eurasia as a Supercontinent Africa is now connected to the middle East but still no however I am not giving up that easily because I have an idea that land bridge that connected Russia to Alaska during the last ice age I think it's possible to bring back Beringia by building dams and the water covering up Beringia will send to the Arctic ocean and the Pacific ocean and with Beringia brought back not only this would help us with climate change but it also means that Afro-Eurasia is connected to the Americas. Afro-Eurasia + the Americas = Afro-Laurasia. And a Supercontinent is recognized if all or most of earth land mass are connected and scientists didn't say anything about a land bridge not counting. And Oceania is gonna join millions of years later anyways.
I'm used to see that africa-europa separate from Asia and then rotate anti-clockwise and unite with the rest of the continent. Anyway, nice animations.
Dentro de chorrosientos millones de años podre ir en carrito desde Venezuela a Australia en menos de 12 horas...... Alucinante 😱. ... Cuando eso pase ya habremos emigrado a Rigel 7.
Are those "theories" just made up of thin air or how can even the basic drift direction of continents differ completely? I don't expect any precision, but at least a foundation that makes it seem like the drift is understood in general. This is not it.
@@droopsmoop Yea but seeing those 4 models, which are completely different to each other, means at least 3 if not all 4 are completely wrong and that means we can't predict jackshit about future plate tectonics, making this video kind of pointless.
what's freaky is that there is much, much more water than land and we're just lucky that there is land sticking up out of the seas, pure luck. It could all sink forever tho someday.
Pangea Proxima seems most likely, iv you put the same style of videos together, one Pangea’s breakup, other as formation of Pangea Proxima, with no break in between, the continents would keep moving in the same direction, and just seems like a more accurate theory. Novo pangea is also pretty accurate, but Amasia, oh boy Amasia. HOW WOULD IT EVEN HAPPEN!? how just suddenly every continent gravitates upward as if a flat earther explaining how “ ThE WaTeR DoEsNt StIcK To A SpHeRE” and why, why Antarctica doesnt even move!? Cmon now.
@@iandoster4680 hah, I know they have 2 different names. Jeez I guess my joke was just too hard to understand. Understandable that one wasn't even funny 🙄
Because they don't know and are guessing. Plate tectonics is 60 years old trying to explain things happening hundreds of year in the future. It's difficult.
@@SheepWaveMeByeBye Well, that much I can figure out too. I'd like to hear a detailed answer. What is the least understood part in models - heat transfer, plate velocities, material structure in depth, maybe something completely different? Or is it all just too chaotic to predict that far?
I thought an easy projection would be the dividing of Africa east and west with an inland sea in the middle. In fact it's beginning to happen already in real time yet I don't see it in any of your models - all five, I believe. Are you sure Africa is not headed towards the dividing of the continent or do you know something the rest of us are not aware of?
The first model showed a bit of activity. But yes, I too was surprised at how conservative the models were overall in their predictions regarding Africa.
I don't understand that one. Anyway, the eastern part of Siberia is actually on the northamerican plate, not the eurasian. But that line does not go through central Asia, so I'm wondering where that scenario comes from.
Aurica was the most interesting...are you listening planet Earth? But, none of them seemed to take in account N. America is going to break off significant pieces of its Southeastern and Western coasts, and possibly major split on the New Madrid Fault...before coming together again when the continents collide to form a super-continent. Not a pretty picture, imjustsaying.
So Black Sea remains there in all 4 scenarios. Perfect.
Not in Pangaea Proxima
SHUT UP
RIGHT NOW
Days later
Ahahahahahahahahahaahhahahahaha
@@bubblitzbubba3501 Liar
model no.2 seems to be most accurate(as it follows theory of plate tectonics)
because:
N.America is moving away from Europe(simply-continuous expansion of Atlantic ocean)
African rift valley(River Nile)will break Africa
Indian plate is heading towards its NE
Austrailan plate is moving towards North.
@@darthvader1793 I suppose 250 Million years is too long to wait?
@@darthvader1793 💀 india is connected to eurasia/europe and asia
@@einfrankfurter3520 or 200 millions years according to The Future Is Wild
The Atlantic will almost certainly develop a subduction zone and cease to expand. This has happened to most other oceans formed in this way.
Iceland and New Zealand :
Am i a joke to you ?
So far, the biggest convergent zone is western Pacific and the biggest divergent zone is the mid Atlantic. Only one of these seems to follow that, but faults may change Megaanna down the line. Also it'd be nice to pull Greenland and Antarctica closer to the equator
Some models theorize the Atlantic will expand and then contract as the oceanic shelf subducts under the continental shelf in either the Americas or Afro-Europe, creating a new convergent zone that eventually eliminates the Atlantic
@@TheGuyCalledXI second this. I’m pretty sure there’s a subduction zone forming near Portugal which would explain the earthquake of 1755
Hmmm...
Well, that last scenario looked pretty fantastic.
Very cool. However, if we take into account chaos theory, the actual future Earth is basically close to impossible to be predicted accurately. There are countless of variables affecting the initial state of these tectonic plates on Earth itself, not to mention variables that come from outside of the Earth, such as asteroids, sun flares, etc.
closest to accurate prediction would be to add different variables to the basic model, like make one model based on simple cont drift without any outside factors, then add in various possibilities and see where that takes it, we could end up with hundreds or thousands of possible models and no way to know which one is correct but at least we'd know one is likely accurate.
In summary, all four describe a supercontinent composed of already established land masses, and the only significant difference is WHERE it will end up 250 million years from now. One forms in the Arctic, one forms in the Pacific, and two in the Atlantic with the difference between them being to which side Africa will go.
Good Job!
Thank you! I must say, I never actually expected a comment from you.
It's Christopher scotese😱😱😱😱😱
I think model number 2 is the most reliable
1:17 Africa: Looks like I dont need Somalkenyanzanique anymore *splits apart*
0:19 Did someone forget Panama?
Maybe Panama sinks into water
The continent polygons used for the data didn't include Panama.
Pffffffff........
Hahahahaahahaahaha
Why isn't here and why????🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@samuelhoskins9983 Oof. My babysitter is from Panama.
To: Europe
So the predictions are based on where existing continental landmasses are being shifted to? Do any of these factor in island or hell, continent formation from plate collisions and/or volcanic activity?
Otherwise, its just a fun series of snipping, distorting, and rotating continental silhouettes into each other. Yay. I'd like to see the actual plates, otherwise this is just a game of remix and island deletion.
Same
Why
Yes they do, otherwise there wouldn't be 4 of them.
Aurica model does show "Eurafrica" moving west in one piece, for example.
why do you think only 4 have been made
Yes, actually.
What if the Russian rift from Aurica, the Antarctic Rift and African Rift from Novopangea, and the North Pole centering from Amasia all occurred? What would that look like? (It's my headcanon, and I call it Ryperna.)
Interesting...
I love how UK refuses to merge into the eurasia mainland
Brexit lasts forever
@@timsaho1462 UK didn't last in the aurica one. Canada collided with it
0:28 Oops, i ripped apart
OH NO RUSTY BOI
Aurica:
UK: Wait... Wait...Slow Down!!!
Same with france
The best👍👍🔥, this is i search
I believe model 2!🔥
1:58 - 2:21
South America, what are you doing?
“Got flipped-turned upside down.”
Prince of Bel Air ref.
South America may moved and killing panama, guatemala, the Caribbean Islands and Jamaica
How does Antarctica not move in the amasia scenario
It moves slightly.
Wow next Supercontinent Pangaea Proxima
Or Ultima
Good
Some people don't recognize Afro-Eurasia as a Supercontinent Africa is now connected to the middle East but still no however I am not giving up that easily because I have an idea that land bridge that connected Russia to Alaska during the last ice age I think it's possible to bring back Beringia by building dams and the water covering up Beringia will send to the Arctic ocean and the Pacific ocean and with Beringia brought back not only this would help us with climate change but it also means that Afro-Eurasia is connected to the Americas. Afro-Eurasia + the Americas = Afro-Laurasia. And a Supercontinent is recognized if all or most of earth land mass are connected and scientists didn't say anything about a land bridge not counting. And Oceania is gonna join millions of years later anyways.
2:36 **Eurasia cutely splits into 2 pieces**
1:31 This is the time when Somalia becomes the earth Small Continent In Novopangea
Somalia will break off of africa? Yes. Its true. That means that supercontident novopangea will happen.
Entire east Africa
@@jaxg. Might fail in the future, and there are other ways the fututre supercontinent could form.
Somalia splits from africa but whole land is full of fishes
Did some really forget New Zealandia
I'm used to see that africa-europa separate from Asia and then rotate anti-clockwise and unite with the rest of the continent. Anyway, nice animations.
Dentro de chorrosientos millones de años podre ir en carrito desde Venezuela a Australia en menos de 12 horas...... Alucinante 😱. ... Cuando eso pase ya habremos emigrado a Rigel 7.
Did ya speak eng or other
Antarctica be like in Amasia:
I’m just chillin and isolated from the rest of the world. Finally, no one can take my land!
South America and Africa in aurcia be like : South America says for africa : now we merge together same we merged in supercontinent pangea
Are those "theories" just made up of thin air or how can even the basic drift direction of continents differ completely? I don't expect any precision, but at least a foundation that makes it seem like the drift is understood in general. This is not it.
estimates from studying older movements of the plates
The basic drift direction going the other way is called Introversion, it's something that did happen at least once
@@droopsmoop Yea but seeing those 4 models, which are completely different to each other, means at least 3 if not all 4 are completely wrong and that means we can't predict jackshit about future plate tectonics, making this video kind of pointless.
@@dfg12382 meh, Speculation is kinda fun.
National borders seem to have some priority that forces "clean" shapes in these animations, likely destroying any semblance of accuracy.
0:58 Pangaea Ultima or Pangaea Proxima
1:41 Novopangaea
2:22 Amasia
3:09 Aurica
Why does the Mediterranean just die for every model?
Because of africa’s movement.
It's now replaced by a Himalayas sized mountain range
Black Sea stay for every model.
This better happen fast I don’t want the islands to get flooded by the water
what's freaky is that there is much, much more water than land and we're just lucky that there is land sticking up out of the seas, pure luck. It could all sink forever tho someday.
in all models, indian subcontinent remained same.
Actually, it didn't in novopangea because Somalia collided with India and Sri lanka
It’s its own tectonic plate
Indian plate
Amazing! it would be nice to make the gplate project public tho
Pangea Proxima or Novopangea are probably the most likely ones
Oh!
no, it's Amasia
@@jeanneacelo5414 in Amasia one of the tectonic plates (Antarctica) never moves whatsoever, which is incredibly unrealistic
Pangea Proxima seems most likely, iv you put the same style of videos together, one Pangea’s breakup, other as formation of Pangea Proxima, with no break in between, the continents would keep moving in the same direction, and just seems like a more accurate theory. Novo pangea is also pretty accurate, but Amasia, oh boy Amasia. HOW WOULD IT EVEN HAPPEN!? how just suddenly every continent gravitates upward as if a flat earther explaining how “ ThE WaTeR DoEsNt StIcK To A SpHeRE” and why, why Antarctica doesnt even move!? Cmon now.
Dang Antartica would be really isolated if Model 3 took place.
Antarctica might move slower a bit
Yes, Antarctica may move.
3:11 That Looks Like Rodinia
How do you make this?
Gplates
I like it
Lol First 😂
looks like my property is going to be a beach-side one.
great.
... but in the ARCTICS DAMMIT!
Is it just me or does Aurica look similar to Rodinia
Yes, very similar. But Asia is in place of Africa.
@@TheRealAximen_3456 yep
@@terraformedmarsobjectcosmos Remember me?
Very similar Rodinia had little lake at the top centre
Novopangea also looks similar
So no time scale on the map?
No
I don't know
Itsays 250 million years in the description
@@mxruwa5741 yes , I see it now, fair enough but the rolling time clock on display is helpful
if amasia does form in the future,it will be more like the novopangea model where the Atlantic grows and the Pacific shrinks.
WHERE’S NEW ZEALAND?
Australia is too big
nice video
Yo're in the world
Im in the Philippines
*Zoom to moon*
Christopher Scotese's name for the central Pangaea Proxima sea is the "Medi-Pangaean Sea"
not a fan of model 3 which creates basically a mega siberia in the arctic circle.
Nice!
Britain: *eats popcorn*
Korean : me, too
Here: nothing
Me: hello mother(____)er
Microbe: hello hi
Russia: drinking vodka
In the 3rd Santonio antarctica moves a little bit then stops
Africa is moving slowly
Peninsular Malaysia not change for all model
Uh sir can you please 6 models for me I want to watch 6 models
Model 3 looks very very realistic!!
It's Amasia
Yes, it is Amasia.
what did you use for doing that animation ?
Gplates
I Use This Too
0:58 Pangaea Ultima
1:41 Novopangaea
2:22 Amasia
3:09 Aurica
You mean, PANGEA PROXIMA?
Look at the comment below this one.
@@iandoster4680 hah, I know they have 2 different names. Jeez I guess my joke was just too hard to understand. Understandable that one wasn't even funny 🙄
No, I mean there are two comments. One below the other.
@@iandoster4680 one below your mom's belly button 💀
Super Good!
Where the hell is New Zealand? U forgot
iceland is missing too, maybe iceland melted into water and a evil kangaroo destroyed new Zealand because it had kiwis
The (____)
New Zealand might not be shown in gplates
why are the models so different, even in near future?
Because they don't know and are guessing. Plate tectonics is 60 years old trying to explain things happening hundreds of year in the future. It's difficult.
@@SheepWaveMeByeBye Well, that much I can figure out too. I'd like to hear a detailed answer. What is the least understood part in models - heat transfer, plate velocities, material structure in depth, maybe something completely different? Or is it all just too chaotic to predict that far?
To many factors, to many time (miljons of years), to many variables,...?
Hello.🤫
The second model seemed more accurate
WOW
Yyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Where it doesn't matter to me how it looks I won't be alive to see it happen
Huh??????????????
There goes all my coastal land values...
How does Australia go thru Indonesia and it still survives?
2:15
I thought an easy projection would be the dividing of Africa east and west with an inland sea in the middle. In fact it's beginning to happen already in real time yet I don't see it in any of your models - all five, I believe. Are you sure Africa is not headed towards the dividing of the continent or do you know something the rest of us are not aware of?
The first model showed a bit of activity. But yes, I too was surprised at how conservative the models were overall in their predictions regarding Africa.
i live this song in watch too many times.
Are sea kevels integrated
1:55 Activating pangea proxima mode... FAILED!
Russia just breaks in half in the 4th one
Ohhhhh
I don't understand that one. Anyway, the eastern part of Siberia is actually on the northamerican plate, not the eurasian. But that line does not go through central Asia, so I'm wondering where that scenario comes from.
Pasific plate are the fastest moving plate tectonics
But you will delete small islands of course,
also how do you make videos?
The Pacifc ocean in Amasia part: hey im now a lil small
Why all continents are moving upwards like Africa in Europe Australia in Asia. Northside??
Aurica was the most interesting...are you listening planet Earth? But, none of them seemed to take in account N. America is going to break off significant pieces of its Southeastern and Western coasts, and possibly major split on the New Madrid Fault...before coming together again when the continents collide to form a super-continent. Not a pretty picture, imjustsaying.
Why in amasia model, Antarctica don't move at all?
I'm guessing the people who made the data I used for that model forgot about it.
Why
@@Philippineball1062 It’s because of the continental Movements. Australia came from Antarctica in Pangea’s Breakup, Heading towards east asia.
@@yelloman_ Well Philippines is not the only country in asia. It could've got to Japan or Siberia
@@Philippineball1062 No. Philippines maybe crash onto india.
The first model shows the UK be coming a north pole. That's fucking awesome !!! I wonder what sea levels will do to our country if that comes to pass.
panama just vanished on the last one lol
I think model 3 is most realistic and probably will happen.
Yeah probably
While Pangea Proxima is my favorite, Amasia seems to be the most likely.
How do I make my own future plate tectonic
2:39 What the hell happened to Antarctica
My understanding is almost all of the plates are pushing northward.
First one be like:
South America: we heading to Madagascar >:)
Madagascar: oh sh-
2:10 South America turned on sideways
All wildly different.
Did you include UK Small?
Imagine if Pikmin got it 100% right
new zealand
0:58 Pangean Proxima
Can you make more videos about ("Rodinia to Amasia")
This got me 100 minutes to see the countries 😂
Is nobody gonna talk about how Panama was just gone
Model 3:
There will always be an England.
Wheres New Zealand?
사람이 살지 않을텐데
People will either become mutants or disappear before then.
Amasia I see👀
1:55 I have to stay in location and sit.
NOOOO REST IN PEACE INDO!!!!! NOOOOOO
Nach Modell 2 wird man also auch noch in Millionen Jahren nach Italien an den Strand fahren können 🙂
r\mapswithoutnewzealand
What
รรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรรร
How you make this video?