Excellent review. I appreciate that you showed some great photos of wildlife, zoos, and sports. Most reviewers of this lens concentrate on portraits and weddings.
Thank's a lot. I probably will also buy this lens, but it is not at the top of my priorities, which are the RF 100 F2.8 Macro and the RF 100-500mm for wildlife.
@@9rider11 thanks for the comment. I bought them from www.lifeguard-design.com/categories/canon-rf-lens-skin but they are available from other websites. Hope that helps.
You can’t realistically call yourself a photographer if you don’t have a 70-200 2.8? Beg to differ. I don’t need 70-100. On my R7 the EF 100-400 F5.6 ii with a Metabones 0.71x is a 110-420 F2.8. You can keep the rf
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Excellent review. I appreciate that you showed some great photos of wildlife, zoos, and sports. Most reviewers of this lens concentrate on portraits and weddings.
Nice photos! I have the EF 70-200 2.8 MKIII and it is amazing, but definitely very heavy and lengthy.
Thanks. The EF version is still great. Probably no need to upgrade. The only real benefit of the RF version is the size and weight.
Thank's a lot. I probably will also buy this lens, but it is not at the top of my priorities, which are the RF 100 F2.8 Macro and the RF 100-500mm for wildlife.
Thanks for comment. I hope the RF100 is a good purchase for you. It looks like another great lens made by canon.
Thanks for sharing. Where can i get the skinz wrap for my lens?
@@9rider11 thanks for the comment. I bought them from www.lifeguard-design.com/categories/canon-rf-lens-skin
but they are available from other websites. Hope that helps.
@@mstarling79 thanks!
You can’t realistically call yourself a photographer if you don’t have a 70-200 2.8? Beg to differ. I don’t need 70-100. On my R7 the EF 100-400 F5.6 ii with a Metabones 0.71x is a 110-420 F2.8. You can keep the rf