2024 Spaceport America Cup | Day 4 Launch
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 дек 2024
- Music: Monolith by Soundridemusic
Music from #InAudio: inaudio.org/
Infraction.
27:50 Team 31 Embry Riddle University Daytona Beach SEDS
47:55 Team 29 Ecole National Polytechnic School of Oran
49:40 Team 156 UWRT
50:00 Team 41 Houston Community College
50:55 Team 38 ETERNAL ROCKET
54:10 Team 77 Rowan University IREC Clinic
56:00 Team 46 Kondakova Rocketry-Instituto Politecnico Nacional
57:40 Team 145 Vellore Institute of Technology - Team Sammard
1:01:00 Team 04 Arizona State University SEDS Rocketry Division
1:02:40 Team 138 University of Texas Rio Grand Valley
1:04:30 Team 15 Carleton University InSpace
1:08:00 Team 73 Queen's Rocket Engineering Team
1:10:30 Team 48 Iowa State University (Rapid Disassembly)
1:12:40 Team 18 CUHAR
1:14:40 Team 110 University of British Columbia
1:16:40 Team 136 University of Texas El Paso
1:18:40 Team 16 Case University Rocket Team (2024)
1:23:40 Team 94 University of Akron (Rapid Disassembly)
1:38:10 Team 110 UND Advanced Rocketry Club
2:20:00 Team 47 ITBA Rocketry Team (Hybrid)
2:21:50 Team 104 CIUDSE
2:24:10 Team 44 IITB Rocket Team
2:26:40 Team 43 Team Abhyuday
2:53:00 Team 102 MetRocketry's team
3:07:25 Team 10 Baylor Rocketry
3:58:00 Team 126 University of Nevada Las Vegas
4:00:30 Team 63 National University of Science and Technology Bucharest (Rapid Disassembly)
5:28:05 Team 62 National Autonomus University of Mexico (Hybrid)
Time for every launch
Team 31 29:50 ERFSEDS
Team 29 48:20 SkyDz from the National Polytechnic School of Oran
Team 156 49:40 UWRT
Team 41 50:00 Katy Rocket Club
Team 38 50:55 ETERNAL ROCKET
Team 77 54:10 Rowan University IREC Clinic
Team 46 56:00 Kondakova Rocketry-Instituto Politecnico Nacional
Team 145 57:40 VIT Vellore- Team Sammard
Team 04 1:01:00 ASU SEDS Rocketry Division
Team 138 1:02:40 The Rocket Launchers
Team 15 1:04:30 Carleton University InSpace
Team 73 1:08:00 Queen's Rocket Engineering Team
Team 48 1:10:30 Cyclone Rocketry (Rapid Disassembly)
Team 18 1:12:40 CUHAR
Team 110 1:14:40 UBC Rocket
Team 136 1:16:40 Sun City Summit Rocket Team 2024
Team 16 1:18:40 Case Rocket Team (2024)
Team 94 1:23:40 Akronauts (Rapid Disassembly)
Team 110 1:38:10 UND Advanced Rocketry Club
Team 47 2:20:00 ITBA Rocketry Team (Hybrid)
Team 104 2:21:50 CIUDSE
Team 44 2:24:10 IITB Rocket Team
Team 43 2:26:40 Team Abhyuday
Team 102 2:53:00 MetRocketry's team
Team 10 3:07:25 Aero at Baylor Rocketry
Team 126 3:58:00 SEDS UNLV
Team 63 4:00:30 Constantin-Cătălin Chelmuș's team (Rapid Disassembly)
Team 62 5:28:05 National Autonomus University of MÃxico - PU (Hybrid)
26 Launches Solid
2 Launches Hybrid
God bless you!!
@@bensas42 Thank you, God bless you to.
2:53:00 Team 102 - MetRocketry - Toronto Metropolitan University
The second stage did not ignite, recovery was easy and safe.
Most of the body was intact including fins, booster, sustainer, one recovery section, and nosecone, but some couplers were zippered.
The actual reason of instability is still not fully known but there are multiple theories.
Payload worked nominally which was live streaming to a DJI goggle using a DJI O3 Air unit with launch detection for camera arming and roll stabilization, no recording survived though.
That was the team's first 2-stage launch, a lot of lessons learnt, already working for a successful launch next year!
That was an amazing attempt! Great team effort! Congrats team 102! Congrats Alessandro Ciniello!
Congrats, even SpaceX has mishaps, lots of learning and development opportunities!
We launched a 10k single stage, 2 stage is freaking hard!
5:28:22 Propulsion UNAM
55:57 IPN-UPIIG
1:02:00 University of Texas - Rio Grande Valley
Saturday is launch day on the itinerary. Why aren't the students given that opportunity to retrieve their rocket in time to be judged? Very disappointed in the organization. That is completely unfair
Most of the team launched on Saturday had been ready for days, but the bad weather kept them delay.
Final judging deliberations must take place on Saturday prior to the awards ceremony. All of the team points for the many different scoring elements must be reviewed and assessed one last time. This is not a surprise to the teams since the schedule is posted in October or soon after. The volunteer judging team works very very hard to make the event as fair as possible.
I don't care how hard they try to make it fair before the event, I care hard hard they try to keep it fair during the event. The event was planned well, but the execution disappointed because ESRA could not handle the weather delays in a equitable way. Teams NEED to be given the chance to recover their aircraft and get judged if they have been ready all week without being given the opportunity to launch. These teams were punished for doing nothing wrong because ESRA didn't want to let them recover.
In the end, Spaceport America Cup is meant to give students a real world engineering challenge in the form of a competition to gain real world experience students can take to the industry. The competition begins in October culminating in technical presentations, podium sessions, celebration of achievements for all teams, and flights of rockets. There’s always room for improvement. The fact that about 118 of 122 rockets were able to fly is a huge accomplishment. Many improvements were implemented this year, many more to come, it’s not always perfect, that’s how it goes in the real world too.
Cliffe, this never was about people who launched, this is about ESRA making it impossible for 28 teams (1/4 of the teams) to recover and get consequently get 50% of their total competition points. This includes historically phenomenal teams like Embry-Riddle, Iowa State, and many more. ESRA didn't let teams recover in time, leading to them not getting points that they otherwise would've had.
Agreed, Franca.
Lots of inconsistency resulting in unfair results. Bravo.
1:23:55 Unfortunate accident, I hope they do better next year, but watching this near the pads was crazy!
Why did the students that launch today Sat not get judged on their rocket recovery? They received a zero?????
They didn’t get to recover?
They did not get sufficient time to recover, no. Much less time than every other day. Arbitrary decision and many teams received zero points for their launches because of it. So unfair.
As stated in a separate thread, final judging deliberations must take place on Saturday prior to the awards ceremony. All of the team points for the many different scoring elements must be reviewed and assessed one last time, hence the cutoff at noon. This is not a surprise to the teams since the schedule is posted in October or soon after. The volunteer judging team works very very hard to make the event as fair as possible.
Oh, that is understood.
What is unfair is that many of those teams were ready from the first day and each day and on the pad each day, early on, and yet did not get to launch. The organization should at least acknowledge that those teams were not scored and so it was not a full field, through no fault of their own. I know one team that was told to stand down, and then the organization went ahead and launched other teams in the same category. Hard not to feel slighted. You pretend it was fair, when you know it was not. At least acknowledge that teams should have been scored, and that the cutoff of noon was unfair to Saturday’s launch teams. Anyone can see it was unfair, even if there was a reason to be unfair.
You reek of condescension with your ‘they should have known’ comment. The event was more disorganized than in the past and the teams that ‘should have known’ were in fact ready to go on day one, and every day. Don’t make excuses.
Oh - realize that we all appreciate the efforts of volunteers; that’s not in question. But setting a Saturday as a launch day without the opportunity for equal recovery was a mistake, and should be acknowledged by the organizers. Spending a year prepping and travelling thousands of kilometres to launch successfully and recover with no damage and yet get no recognition is crushing for teams, especially when they followed all the rules and were ready to go before many other teams that did get scored. Obviously, the weather did not cooperate - a contingency would be to extend the recovery period to maintain fairness. Some teams missed the ‘cutoff’ by mere minutes, costing them everything. I am sure extra time would have been manageable. If it isn’t, don’t pretend Saturday is a legitimate launch day, or throw out everybody’s results for the whole week due to inconsistency. Even a simple acknowledgement and apology would go a long way. Instead excuses are made and teams themselves blamed, with no basis in fact.
47:30 Algeria 🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿
Appreciating the efforts by the students and great organisational coordination by the committee....keep your humorous informative commendary
2:24:11 Team 44: IIT, Bombay 🎉
At what time will de Ceremony begin ?
2:24:11 favorite
Great videography coverage 👏 👍 🚀🏆
Agreed, Fran. Lots of inconsistency resulting in unfair results! Bravo. Way to lose future participants.
Out of all the 10k hybrid rockets, only one had a successful launch and recovery but the team didn't win any prizes, it ended up in last place. ESRA needs to take a long hard look at the rulings.
@@bensas42Now that's very unfortunate, specially taking into account the additional prep for a Hybrid launch
Carleton University 1:03:30 🐸🚀
2:53:05
1:38:20 UBCR
2:20:00 ITBA🇦🇷
1:38:27 UBC
2:20:07 ITBA🇦🇷
2:12:50
1:00:20 ASU
Thank you for the coverage and shout out to NSF!
2:26:27 TEAM ABHYUDAY LETSGOOOO
Tell the young lady to back off on the "definitely"s.
🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿
🇩🇿🇩🇿🇩🇿
2:20:00