What If Paramount Sells Star Trek?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 12 сен 2024
- Shock plan to sell Star Trek? WIth everything being in the air about Paramount and its future, maybe it would be a good idea for them to sell the rights for Star Trek? Let me know your thoughts in the comments!! #SciTrek #startrek #scifi
Episodes premiere on Patreon.com/scitrek
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @scitrek
-----------------------------
Community Links
-----------------------------
- Merch : sci-trek.com
- Discord Community : / discord
- Facebook Group : / 256007336338039
- Subreddit : / scitrek
- Channel Twitter : / tv_sci @tv_sci
- Stormy's Twitter : / stormbear
-----------------------------
Our Other Channels
-----------------------------
- Sci-Trek Sides : / channel
- Stormy's Channel (Our Resident American) : / sciworx
- Harris Channel (The young american): / @m3momomu
NEW UPDATE: SKYDANCE HAS COME TO A PRELIMINARY AGREEMENT FOR THEIR PURCHASE OF PARAMOUNT!! STAY TUNED SOON FOR A NEW VIDEO ABOUT THAT!
I hope Paramount keeps "Star Trek," as long as it's on the condition of replacing Alex Kurtzman and JJ Abrams and their respective production companies as "Star Trek" partners with anyone who understands the franchise from the get-go.
@@DonDonP1 Anyone who understands it needs a retcon back to before all that mess and to continue from the original Voyager/DS9/TNG of Berman (though a continuation of Enterprise era isn't inconceivable as a side project, maybe he sets the timeline right in a one off movie that stops the Abrams/Kurtzman timelines from forming)
The only way Star Trek can be saved is get rid of Secret Hideout and get writers and producers who know what the hell Star Trek s heart and soul is
Kind of ironic that Secret Hideout was one of their big swings to save Paramount and they waged a war on the established fan base
Sell the Star Trek franchise to SETH McFARLAND and his associates!!! He will take care of it and create some fantastic stories.....✨🚀🛸
As long as they don't sell it to Disney.
Shame a group like Axanar can't afford to buy/rent Star Trek!
I just hope they continue Strange New Worlds.
I feel like Star Trek would be in a better place if Enterprise wasn't canceled while on a dying network UPN and the Secret Hideout deal didn't happen. Putting everything exclusively on Paramount+ probably didn't help either.
Enterprise had pretty bad ratings at the time and there where many complaints, too.
@@VolkerHett Very true but it seems like there's way more complaints with today's shows.
It's too bad Alec Peters and Ares Studios can't get involved with it, they at least have a clue as to what Star Trek is.
I have to believe that anyone willing to buy Star Trek will treat it better than the current owners (unless it's Disney of course).
By the time they figures out what they're going to do with Star Trek actual production, I bet we'll be able to ask AI to just make us custom episodes to watch while we're having dinner.
I think it's time for Star Trek 3rd Generation, set on Enterprise J in the year 2462, with an all-new crew, time to get back to what made ST so successful. Give the writers some space to create without having to worry about stepping on lore every 2nd line.
Does anyone know how to spell Seth McFarland ?.
"They would take the intellectual property from Star Trek on loan for say a five year period" - sort of a five-year mission then?
In my opinion, I think sick Paramount should sell Star Trek to Warner Brothers or anyone else that will get rid of Alex Kurtzman and secret hideout. I want them gone. I want I want to bring back real trek
Whats “real trek”? Do you even know?! I doubt it.
@@RoBot9491 real Star Trek is the original series deep space nine Voyager the next generation enterprise the 73 animated series all six of the original crew movies in the next generation crew movies those are all real Star Trek
lol
In order to sell something it must have value.
Small feedback - I find those perpetual subtitles VERY distracting - are they necessary? Surely people can turn on their own subtitles if they want them.
they even spell the channel name as CyTrek 😆
For those of us with attention deficit issues, hardcoded subs are a nuisance.
And who ever gets it will destroy it, drive away all of the ACTUAL fans and make the IP worthless.
Standard operating procedure with IP these days
In case you haven't noticed, ACTUAL fans have been driven away and the IP is worthless. I am not aware of any groundswell of fandom crying out for more of what is currently being produced.
tried prodigy s2?
it was really enjoyable.
Not yet but I’ll be watching it shortly
I watched all 20 episodes within two days, it’s literally my favourite modern based Star Trek show and it’s the one showing not many people are going to watch which is a shame
@@Eva_H exactly, it's brilliant.
the only nitpick I have: the doctor brought the line "I'm a doctor, not a..." a bit too often, of course referencing TOS.
@@robertheinrich2994 it didn’t bother me too much to be honest because I was having such a fun time.
The ending made me cry when cameo met certain character from Picard season three.
Not to mention the episode that seems to be inspired from that season seven episode where everything is in different times, I think it’s season seven episode two?
Overall I just really wish that people would watch the show because prodigy is like so good, I’m so hoping for an S3.
I’ve always said that prodigy could be Star Trek answer to Star Wars TCW, like prodigy being the Star Trek version of.
@@Eva_H I too hope for a S3 for that series. but I understand, that good stories need a start, a nice progression and a good finish. and prodigiy has all of that.
I guess, I need to rewatch the end, because of that cameo. unless you mean the one that started prominently with TNG, I don't know who you mean.
and yes, the episode where voyager A was spilt in various fractions of time was even referenced in the episode, because it was jakotay both times.
Star Trek is a valuable asset and Paramount in need of cash might sign a contract with such ideas that can put some money in the bank. But the only thing i'm worried about is companies coming with stupid ideas for Star Trek. On the other side it might fall in to hands of companies with fresh ideas for the franchise. So a two way street i would say. Forget Lower decks and any other animated shows of Star Trek
A five year “lease” doesn’t seem very long. In the old days, five years was five seasons of 22-24 episodes. Now, it seems to take these studios a minimum of two years just to get a new season of eight to ten episodes which is kind of embarrassing.
So Paramount are hoping to send Star Trek on a 5 year mission?
This isn’t TikTok. There’s no need for the burned-in, animated, often-misspelled subtitles.
You haven't watched Strange New Worlds? Strange New Worlds is almost like having TOS back again. I highly recommend watching it.
Hi Jay I am ready for another one of your great videos💯👍
If they were to lease out Star Trek it would need to be on a much longer timescale like 10 years and certainly not just 5 years. At 5 years you would need all your shows and material pre written and ready to hit the road running.
If it gets JJ and Kurtzman claws of Trek by splitting it off its a good Idea they would have to pay out Kurtzman out and the cash injection selling it off would help them achieve this.
If it goes to Sony and they get Disney's help to finance Trek like they did with Dr Who Treks screwed. And it looks like Skydance is happy to keep working with JJ so Treks screwed there as well.
Whatever is done I believe like separating Star Trek into its own entity and whether it is leased or rented to separate it from Kurtzman I would be in favor of because his vision for this "Beautiful and Historic" franchise is skewed at best. Whether some type of transaction can be made to make him happy like giving him a movie rights or a money transaction then just do it already but protecting Star Trek as its own entity I feel is a good thing for Paramount. Money and good business during these economic times is important and that is the bottom line!
Engulf and Devour in money trouble? Who Knew? Don't worry, I'm here to help. I'll give them 75 cents cold, hard cash for Star Trek.
Secret Hideout will always be a problem.
Can’t they just let their contract run out and then just dismiss it as a joke.
Fortunately fixing Star Trek is dead easy way to fix it thanks to 1 scene in Picard series 1. With this 1 special effect would make Picard and Prodigy part of Discovery universe not the Prime universe and it would be same with Lower Decks be crossover with SNW not TOS.
NEVER HEARD OF: SECRET HIDEOUT‼️
PARAMOUNT IS STAR TREK!! I LOVE STANGE NEW WORLDS!!! Lower Decks-got into Prodidy All the other treks -even the one you don’t like because others too like it and NEVER GET TIRED OF THE ORIGINAL!!!
WHO EVER GETS OUR
THATS RIGHT
OUR STAR TREK!!! THEY BETTER NOT SCREW IT UP!!
I LIKE THE TIME LINES THEY GOT RIGHT NOWWW!
MARVEL HAD MULTI TIME LINES DC TOO & they worked GREAT!!
Kuntzman and company have done such a number on the Star Trek franchise that I don't know that it can any longer be called an asset. The ratings for their shows don't exactly scream out runaway success, with fans gagging for more. I grew up with Kirk and crew, so I am in the purist camp. So I very much appreciate Berman's efforts to adhere to Roddenderry's vision while making shows for the modern day.
Kuntzman and company have done nothing more than make rubbish SciFi shows using Star Trek iconography to justify putting a Star Trek badge on their abominations. Adopting the approach of call it Star Trek and they will come. Thereby proving absolutely no understanding of what the franchise is all about, or why it had been so successful pre 2009.
For Star Trek to live again Kuntzman and Co need to be 100% expunged from any involvement in any future projects. The franchise needs to be rested, allowing a new owner to disassociate their output from post 2009 trash. It will also allow them time to really look at, and understand what they have purchased. Then, having gained an understanding of what made Star Trek so successful, gather together a similarly enlightened and talented staff. Plan how each season is to pan out, then have fun writing the scripts.
Avoiding the use of established, pre 2009, characters as regulars would allow future projects to establish their own individuality, and to live or die on their own merits. If the look of the show respects Berman era shows, and canon is similarly respected, then some new Star Trek could work for me.
Whoever buys this IP needs to want to do more than just churn out yet another Sci-fi show. We are currently experiencing that approach, and it isn't working. I am a fan of many Sci-fi and fantasy shows. The reason Star Trek became my all time favourite IP is because it isn't just another SciFi show. It stands out from the crowd.
Let's hope they don't sell it to Disney.
You know the Skydance deal is back on, right?
I wanted Sony to buy them and was excited when I heard they were close but then like over night, Sony got tanked. I didn't want Skydance I had no trust with them. I was also strongly pulling for "Star Trek Studios" but even that is not being seriously considered.
Yes.
Trek is not worth renting for $500 million, they have ruined it.
I read a new report the Skydance sale is back on
Yes it is! Video coming out ASAP talking about it!
Disney? Well, if they lease it out, they tie it to their approval what the lease does on each property (approval on story line and scripts), first refusal on each production, have it tied to using paramount production and administration services wherever possible (the one leased to, has to pay somebody for outside services, it might as well go to keeping paramount afloat) including studio space, they tie it to receiving 10% of the profits of each production on top of the money from the lease (so a big success brings some income. They could tie the leases to the ones leased to, having to upgrade and maintain studio space in a specific agreed manner, progressively starting immediately. It becomes a mutually beneficial deal, but thinner one for those getting the lease. They could lease excess space through the major space holding company on the basis they maintain and upgrade space, and receive it back in mint condition, then lease it out as part of a Paramount Services company, to productions paid up front. Going in to minor competition with the former company that leased them. Paramount maintains ability to do its own productions when they wish, and becomes a profitable services company to those wanting to take on the risk of production.
If we have a star trek studios, we don't want a Star wars experience with too many productions. Two TV series at once with movie streams for each series, even if some animated etc, to finish up story lines. Sometimes three if overlapped with ending a previous series. Up to three, or more if popular, movies each (say how 1st and next gen went for more, but Deep Space Nine, Voyager and Enterprise, could have done with some movies, with sets and actors already on hand. Cisco's story had only just started, and that could have been tied to action movies. Totally wasted opportunity for profit, as a Ferengi might say).
Jay , Cord cutters says sky dance is buy the redstones 70 %?
Working on a video now talking about the Skydance News!
If Skydance paid off Paramount’s debt in exchange for Redstone’s shares, then that would be a fair deal.
Should they sell Star Trek? Dunno.
I heard on the cord cutting channel that the redstone family is planning on selling their shares to skydance can you confirm if that rumor is true or false?
It’s true. Follow up video coming soon
Prodigy "season 2" came out on Netflix a few days ago, why as you asking for more of it already?
Should to sell to Seth McFarland. At least he would do it correctly. The Orville and Star Trek could be kind cool. Yeah hopefully they don’t sell to Disney Cus Kathleen Kenny would ruin it like she is trying ruin Star Wars. Only Jon and Dave are trying save Star Wars.
Alex Kurtman almost destroyed Picard. He is cancer to Star Trek. Picard season 3 was finally good. And I want see captain 7 with her own show.
It's the propaganda of WOKE that killed Trek...whoever owns it needs to return to the spirit of the franchise. Only then will it be successful again.
apple
Could it be they are planning to sell it to the Axinar group?
Well they suck at doing Star Trek so I'm all for someone else having it! The only half way decent show they have done is Picard, and that only got good with season 3.
Peter Jacksons a newly minted billionaire, ill have a talk to him, see if he's keen
Gets sold to Disney and we have a combined Star Trek, Star Wars and Dr Who Universe called Dr Trek Wars🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. Plot is the Doctor uses the TARDIS to kidnap Kurtzman and take the Discovery to the SW Galaxy where it is destroyed by an Imperial Star Destroyer.
Amazon mgm studios does production work for star trek tv shows and lets Sundance do movies with frist right refusal
No. The only valuable properties they own are Star Trek and Mission impossible. Transformers is owned by Hasbro, Sonic the Hedgehog is owned by Sega.
I see outright purchases star trek ip etc ftc fcc trouble spots for Amazon and disney because both big giants one star wars and other stargate. Like lots up side for paramount on merchandise side just worry with because amazon does heavy lifting.
ST animated series can be cancelled. Never liked it. I have rewatched Discovery, SNW, Picard and Enterprise....Love them. Of course i love DS9, TNG and Voyager too
Paramount will never sale Star trek
Rewatch the last 2 episodes of Picard season 3!!!
I think I’m ready to rewatch the entire season…
Sony buying/renting treck could be very interstimg if done right especlily since sony isn't juts movie and TV they also the the Playstation gaming side something Star Trek barely anything with in over a decade they had many great games in the early 2000s. But now not so much. an ok Prodigy mobile game, a Stelaris reskin and Resurgence which despite having some issues was actually not bad. it was in my mind quite faceful to the lore. and almost felt like playing a season of a new show.
I profit model where both Paramount and mgm+ profits good enough show say paramount exclusive place brand new star trek films but overhead shifted aws and Amazon.
I also amazon prime video purchase tv station every market in country one where just star trek movies and shows 24/7 rotational basis with on demand side rest primarily on aws servers next Picard etc massive rush view paramount doesn't worry it's infrastructure hold up?
Sell it and male legacy or maybe netflix who have the cash to do it right.
I love Star Trek, but... Discovery has been an unmitigated disaster until the very final season. The FINAL season, it finally went the right direction, but all the CRAP before it kindof make it irrelevant. If I rewatched Discovery, I think the first and last seasons would be all I would bother watching. Everything between can just go in the trash. x.x I hate to say that, but there it is. Hopefully, whomever gets it... does better.
please stop doing the annoying forced subtitles. thanks.
Well jay as American hears my thoughts especially if Sundance etc buy redstone out.
Sundance hopefully saying correctly but bread and butter is really good movies.
Here is a thought frist off if Sundance massive cash etc for paramount two one Sundance great fit for paramount's portfolios of movies don't think anyone even disney great job even star wars merchandise etc as they could have done think films and parks Disney's bit and merchandise sort after thought. Saying paramount as bad if worse on that merchandise front for star trek.
So here my thoughts about paramount good studio long term and hugely great if they get paid California studios need updating possibly get off their books California crazy expensive land etc etc right now Amazon studio creaters and purchase property technically not directly amazon company right allow amazon escape ftc etc they dump money Hackman group and right now hackman can't keep up demands mgm studios back catalog ip amazon desperately wants reboot etc with amazon mgm studios trademarks on them many mgm studios back catalog desperately needing modern remakes and reboots but like stargate problem MGM studios old always desperately short funds choose between updating studios or take gamble on stargate etc but right now problem all cash not studio space right now technically Hackman group independent etc amazon amazon MGM studios desperately short space getting crap spaces of paramount studio spaces basically gutting many places many folks terribly expensive etc right right now amazon MGM studios desperately need quick and dirty studio space so no one even consider this for Amazon/ hackman group wet dream get studio space let amazon MGM studios back catalog loose wanted frist desperately brand new spaces state of the art etc just fast amazon E-Commerce get x items dekivered and Amazon already means upload studios filming products directly from cameras to aws truck runs right built local compute for studio space and until data links setup etc dump raw camera footages into aws and Amazon ngm studios own seperate part of aws doesn't anything but Amazon MGM studios upload and cgi on aws servers filming, sound, everything physical media shot uploaded aws amazon MGM studios cloud etc setup putting together right so beautiful part of Amazon mgm studios push from creation side prime video and mgm+ servers speed of light may not released right away but production house over time get trucks just hard fiber etc to aws then aws mgm+ and or prime video at same times maybe do reacher new seasons while mgm+ exclusive 6 months or so reacher etc but done say states think syndication when ready syndication drop mgm+ on top prime video world wide specific versions for individual countries along with the native language translations of the audio.
Frist massive amounts cash into brand new paramount and Sundance company allow movie production budgets right. Then new p& s company dump primary servers etc on aws like version Netflix's does now aws hosting nothing say all or most paramount back catalog server cost etc solves two problems paramount+ service servers and app issues plenty bandwidth @ aws especially setup just for paramount ip especially ancient back catalog but means paramount most tv back catalog on technically aws servers but what paramount Sundance care giant money pit broke even actually made bit money and second Sundance unload massive amounts server cost and infrastructure cost off paramount debt books. Maybe joint deal were if paramount doesn't value in x tv shows but Amazon massive amounts merchandise etc profits then paramount and Amazon and Sundance decided is core to movies stays orginal in house paramount production movies but sweetheart deal with Amazon prime video or mgm+ carry x shows amazon thinking old shows but merchandise now beautiful part for paramount and Sundance they unload actual warehouse cost etc on Amazon win win paramount and Sundance wins
Anybody but Disney and suckit hideout or bad reboot
Elon Musk, please buy Paramount and save Star Trek and boldly go where billionaire has called before!
Wow, full of hate for the good shows, but love the animated crap. typical. 🙄
Yer.., personal opinion is stupid.. 🙄
According to you, ppl are "NOT ALLOWED" to:
*A-* Have an opinion(s).
*B-* Express their opinion(s).
*C-* Say or express these opinions - on THEIR OWN CHANNEL!?! Wut?
I'm sorry, who the hell are you again!? The "thought police"?
Some advice: Go somewhere else to complain. 🙄
If you can't *handle* an opinion OTHER than your own, then Idk what to tell you. You just need to grow up. Like seriously dude...