Spent 30 years dealing with the FDA in manufacturing/research. Then onto FCC for amateur radio license, 3 tests for license and one additional for volunteer examiner. Just starting to dive into the world of FAA. All I really want to do is fly in my backyard and my family’s 10 acre pasture in the north GA mountains. I continuously challenge myself so I will study for the 60 question test. Keeps the grey matter young.
I am a videographer and I have often been tempted to buy a drone; however, I don’t have confidence in law enforcement to be reasonable in this area. I have witnessed helicopters harassing wildlife in National Parks and giving climbers illegal access to climbing routes. I’m sure that these people never faced any consequences.
I fly my drone where I want, how I want and when I want. If you want to film something, fly it from away from the area you want to film. This way, nobody can harass you with all of the bs laws.
After being on the fence regarding buying a DJI mini drone, I have been convinced that it is just too much trouble to partake in this hobby. Unlocking a DJI drone to fly even in low risk situations is just simply too much of a hassle. Good luck to all of you in the future as the U.S. government continues to make this hobby harder and harder to pursue.
@TucsonAgentBond probably because it is a toy regulated and viewed to be more dangerous than a gun? Maybe, that the rules are ever changing? Who wants to be harrased by some lady who says "you can't be here," with no support from the regulating body.
@@Narnald_Ewmanhave you ever owned a dirt bike or a skateboard🤣 or any other recreational device for that matter? If you can’t handle ignorant people possibly talking to you I guess just continue to stay inside
People flying drones into airplanes, drones crashing into crowds at sporting events, drones interfering with firefighting aircraft, and drone creepers started to become news just prior to these rules being enacted. And when the rules and the automated flight restrictions went into effect, most of these problems went away. Mandatory testing for commercial use also helped ensure that people know how to fly safely. And to be fair - it’s not like the rules didn’t exist before the FAA started enforcing them. It’s just that hobby pilots followed them voluntarily as part of their AMA insurance. The thing is - before drone tech, we flew as part of clubs, because club owned airfields were the easiest, safest place to fly our expensive hobby aircraft. But when hobby aircraft flying suddenly got cheap and easy, people started flying without doing any research and started getting into trouble. And when people do stupid stuff, that’s when the rules start. So don’t blame The Man. Blame the idiots who bought hobby drones, didn’t read up on the accepted operating practices, and just did “whatever” with them.
I call BS. As a lifetime RC hobbyist for more than 40 years I can tell similar regulations were always around. Decades ago flying RC models was a niche hobbyist gladly complied with regulations as they recognized the risks. Nowadays remote controlled drones and airplanes have become so easily available and commonplace that too many immature and incompetent people can get their hands on them and pose a risk in public places.
Thank you folks for making this simple. I've been delaying taking the training on account of the language and law surrounding drone operation being very... odd. The FAA has not laid out the material in a very straightforward manner.
Why is it that I feel like those of us who fly just for fun are getting hosed harder and harder. And it's going to just keep getting worse the next few years.
I have been flying RC since 1973. I learned in East Germany from a bunch of outstanding German modelers who gave me my first balsa model. Didn't know what it was because it looked like a hundred people had learned to fly with it and had crashed it and rebuilt it. Those were the days. Sorry to have taken up your time. Take care be safe.
When I was flying back in 2015, it felt like I was the only one in my state who had one. Since then my drones have just sat on the shelf. Things are so different now.
@@BrjanBuckmaster Don't fly in areas that are heavily guarded or places you shouldn't go and don't be uploading videos of you flying beyond the line of sight to RUclips That's another. Sure. Fine way to get caught
This is the best source of information I've found. I've not purchased a drone yet because of all the rules and regulations. One question: for recreational, I can't fly in national parks? Seems a little odd....
If you fly enough you'll notice that during migrations the feral birds really do not enjoy drones. I imagine some nesting spots in some of those forests would change the bird behavior. Some environmentally-hazardous areas use drones to scare birds away for safety so you don't want drones everywhere birds nest.
Waiting on my regiatration stickers from you been almost 2 wlweeks... Hopefully its in the mailbox today. Fingers crossed.. also alomst done with.107 course yay🎉
"don't fly during an NFL game, in a National Park, or in Washington D.C..." 😉 Sorry, couldn't resist. Awesome video content as always. Kuddos to you and your team.
Starting to regret getting back into the hobby with how annoying they've made it. I need to take a 107 test to sell a picture to a local business that wanted it, but I DON'T because that business is owned by my uncle and I just gave it to him, and he gave me $30 because he's a cool guy? Or I'm taking a video for social media and the drone is 8 feet off the ground in my own back yard, I need to take a 107 test? Yeah, nothing more than government wanting to be involved in more of my business when it doesn't concern them. I'm sure being 405 feet in the air over the miles and miles of farmlands and crop fields I live near is extremely dangerous to....someone. Looking up one of the rules about historical sites was that you could get permission to fly and take pictures if it was to promote the site...what? Has no one thought that they want to see the site from an aerial view because it's just a neat thing? Oh wait, that means they aren't making money off you for something.
I am doing studyies currently for my 107 , though it is a 60 question test there is 320 practice exam questions these faa test can cover making studies more difficult. Though my practice exams are all scoring between 93 to 100% it is the other questions i m having comcerens with at the moment. Hopefully i will be ready for the exam in a few weeks while getting more familiar with my drones i currently own. I just started to learn how to fly and looking forward to get proficient with them. Yesterday's flight was totally amazing!
We have the leading part 107 course in the country if you need help. Helped nearly 90,000 pilots now get ready for the exam. Self studying can be tough since you don’t know what you don’t know. Plus our course is so much more than a test prep course. www.pilotinstitute.com/course/part-107-remote-pilot/
@@PilotInstitute ..,.. it has been tough so far in specific areas only however I have spent the enrollment fee with another company before I known of yours. So far with their materials and materials found online, I am averaging 95% accuracy as of now. Besides the 107 however, of course I am enjoying the studies therefore, I would like to consider additional courses related to the field.
I'll follow all these rules except the needing a visual observer when using FPV. Thats just incredibly unrealistic to have someone on standby watching me fly a damn drone.
I can summarize every single purpose that gov rules/restrictions are created with ONE WORD, and it is NOT for the security of “We The People”! “Control”
I sympathize with your frustration. The arbitrariness of the rules certainly makes me feel that way at times. Flying a drone can be dangerous and I want the government to have rules around it. But the way they've done it is counterproductive.
I took the (TRUST) test this afternoon and passed it easy. Most of the subject matter was familiar to me. Now I can fly my MINI 2 with peace of mind and legit. Now time to study for part 107 Thank you “Pilot Institute” you guys rock! 🤘🏼
This video is an instrumental reminder and a good training tool for younger pilots. I've shared it with my kids a few times already since I got them into drone flying a few weeks ago. Two question thoughs.... you only mention National Parks once during rule 10. I reside in rural Alaska with a few airports and airstrips nearby. It's one of those "if you're out of town and not near population, you're good -ish" kinds of things. The first question is this is the first i've heard of national parks being restricted airspace, as my UAS app doesn't mark this and our Wildlife Troopers have said its good. Is there a reference point you can share for this??? Secondly, on the concept of recreation, I've been asked a few times by Search and Rescue folks who know i have drones and have good xp of the area (because of recreational nature filming) to help find lost people from time to time, even "on the spot" kinds of things, example is i'm out filming me fishing and the S&R friends go "hey can you help us find a lost hiker?" Now the good Samaritan and neighbor in me packs up and takes the time to help them, however the question is does this cross into Part 107, and should I refuse going forward because I do not yet have my 107 license??? Thanks in advance.
Good video, but I have a question. In the video you mention that you are not allowed to fly over sporting events, in Washington DC, and in national parks. And you reference Air Aware as a good app for checking where you can fly or for getting LAANC approval. I noticed however, that if I put a pin inside the boundaries of Great Smokey Mountain National Park it does not say restricted, just cautionary air space, and the note says to check with the Park Service before flying...........does that mean you can get permission to fly there? If I go to Grand Canyon NP instead, it does show restricted in the app.
I always hated government rules and bureaucracy because they make the regulations too hard for anyone to possibly understand! I bought a drone under 250 grams, and I am assuming that I don't need to do anything with the FAA. I think the only rules which pertain to me is that I should keep the altitude below 400 feet and have a line of sight. I am going to say, if the government gets mad at me, let them try to fine and imprison me, as I don't have very much anyway and they won't get anything from me! I will post the drone videos to my RUclips channel... RUclips would never allow me to monetize anyway because I refuse to tell lies to the brainwashed sheeple!
If you fly on an open airspace without any regulation you can fly far from the line of sight rule, many recreational drone flyers fly their drones at its maximum distance meaning zero line of sight and just rely on the camera transmission perfectly legal.
CBO…what is the point of these? If they are an organization that makes rules for pilots to folllow which are approved by the FAA, then why doesn’t the FAA just cut out the middle man and give the rules directly to pilots. They already do that with other rules. Why do the CBOs need to exist at all?
How can they regulate homemade drones? Can't operators just use modified aircraft and open source flight software like ArduPilot? I just don't see how they can stop that unless it's built into electronics like the DJI.
The same way they regulate driving. You can drive without a license, insurance, or registration. If you get in trouble, it's MUCH bigger trouble. You could also simply be reported, and the FAA takes that seriously.
I’ll tell you what if I was flying recreational and somebody said their kids lost in the woods I wouldn’t hesitate to bring my drone up up and away .I wouldn’t worry about no 107. Lives life Are more important than the rules.
It’s one thing to do this in an emergency. Lives in danger trump regulatory rules like this. But if you join a SAR group, participate in exercises, and prepare for such an event, that’s a different story.
@@tomwilson2112which is also funny because if you seen the test for 107 it's nothing even remotely useful for the typical SAR drone operator because you aren't taking off at an airport to go 30,00ft off the ground or anything 😂 And honestly I doubt any president micro manages these agencies except for extreme circumstances, the people working there probably make suggestions and the executive staff are probably like "fine whatever"
No, you fool. Government’s purpose is to make everyone’s life, collectively, as good as it can be. That means we each give up some small freedoms so all of society can benefit. The needs of many outweigh the needs of the few. Smarten up!
Is EVERYTHING about your life difficult due to the government? EVERYTHING? If so, that's your world. Don't put that on me or anyone else. And you did that by using the word "our". I have a lot of easy parts of my life that the government doesn't make difficult. Please chill out with the exaggeration. Please.
Sadly, this is becoming much more true every day. The rules as they are are fine. However, when you add to the mix individuals that are flaming ignorant racist trying to ban everything that isn't American made (cause American made products don't siphon are info either😊) just because they're late in understanding how it works, or are just to idiotic to understand, then it makes you wonder why these individuals are still on power when they're so clearly just bored. Ps: don't mind the children who commented in favor of the government. Some kids just don't know when their parents are smothering them and think that they just care or are to scared to challenge them if you catch my drift.
No it's everyone that ruins it for everyone else that causes such regulations. People doing stupid things. There are consequences for everything you do, good or bad. Remember this and you might have a better outlook in life 👍
So would you prefer the FAA be hands off and let someone else regulate drones? Would you prefer that there are no regulations for drone operation? Imagine sitting down at one of the many benches around Old Faithful in Yellowstone waiting for the geyser to pop along with 1000 other people while a dozen of more drones fly overhead, perhaps crashing into one another and then falling on the 1000 people below. Imagine this problem being the province of lawyers when private individuals sue you for flying near them? Now imagine that there is no regulatory body that can step in to thwart that lawsuit since you followed the rules they, the FAA, have outlined. Imagine driving down the highway and sharing the road with people weaving in and out of traffic and otherwise endangering the mooring public and there are no cops to limit the activities of the nut jobs driving like entitled idiots. I find it sad that many people think the world would be a better place if there were no rules and no rule makers!
Comply? Easy? I've been flying for over a decade and have never once flown at a club or anywhere else that would now be considered a CBO. I've had no desire to do so and I just won't do that. Thousands of us live in areas that don't have such facilities and some of us wouldn't care to fly at them if we did. This is the United States and I won't be showing my papers or any other BS if I feel like I can fly my tiny little foam airplane safely like I has always done@@PilotInstitute
Comply? Easy? There is no CBO anywhere near where I fly. I've never flown it a club and have no desire to. I can drive 4 miles and miles and never see another car or here or see an airplane. The regulations don't seem like they were made for some of the states with low populations. And I was going to say that I'll just continue to be a renegade but I will do so in a common sense and safe manner. But upon thinking about it further, I'm just going to quit. Right now. I only have one small plane so I think it's a good time to get out of the hobby. It's been fun but the regulations in my opinion are ridiculous. Things have changed a lot, FPV can be done a lot safer yet they still have the line of sight requirement. I'll just find something else to do, it's time to move on in any way. I never stick with the same hobby for too long. I'm sure I can find someone to take my drone off my hands@@PilotInstitute
@@PilotInstitute Remote ID makes no sense. $300+ part for a $50 drone. Also it broadcasts your location for anyone wanting to come and rob you, or troll you as you are flying.
Thanl you. Very useful video 😊 Do all these rules also apply to the relatively new mini selfie drone HoverAir X1? It weighs 125 grams and it follows you visually without the need of a controller. It can only be up til 30 ft from you.
When the eclipse happens here in Houston we will be 90% effected. I thought I would take my DJI Mavic 2 Zoom and go up about 250-300' and park it there videoing the skyline of downtown Houston. Other people may have ideas on doing something like this.
I own a large property watched by security cameras often I see something on the camera I want to go check out but it's safer to send the drone to take a look. Am I not allowed to do this?
You forgot to mention local regulations, which are way stricter then the FAA. Hell in Mesa, AZ where i live you cant tech fly your drone anywhere, besides a single park called Basin 115. I would say local municipalities are going out of their way to ruin drone flying nation wide. Just bought a drone, am already regretting it. If you want to stay "legal" there a lot more then 10 rules.
its glaringly obvious some of these rules are less about being responsible and looking out for others and more about making peoples jobs easier. DJI drones disappear after just 50ft because its a tiny grey plastic rectangle. Monitoring flights in my home county has never showed a flight below 28,000ft yet Im limited to 400ft? Not being able to fly over people or cars instantly makes 1/3rd of what ive seen on instagram illegal. Its sad that how the drone hobby got picked at over the years. I had a mini 2 and was looking to get back into but there is nothing you CAN do with these anymore
omg I live here in Los Angeles and today is August 5th 2024. Here I was thinking let me buy a drone and fly it right away but all these rules are a turn off. I understand safety but still 😨😨😨
Part 107 is kinda comical. Pretty much nothing is on that test that a drone pilot needs to know. Now if I'm flying a drone from a runway at the airport to 30k feet then sure. Air density might play a role and charts might play a role. It's really just the government getting their 1/2 of your income if you go that way.
@@username7763make the rules as complicated as possible, so that nobody understands them. Flying to a max height of 400 ft in the middle of no where makes no sense. Drone’s could be fitted with a transponder activated as soon as they fly above 400ft, 🆔 them as a flying drone, to other aircraft.
You specifically stated flying to post video on a "monetized" RUclips channel is not accessible when flying recreationally. This would seem to imply flying under these rules is permissible, and posting videos on a "non-monitized" RUclips channel is acceptable. Is this correct?
What if your intent is only for recreation when you decided to fly and later you decide to post to a youtube channel. Does that make the perfectly legal flight suddenly illegal in the past? I'd have to understand why posting videos to youtube is considered dangerous flying I guess. Is posting to rumble considered safe by the FAA?
@@SlackerU That's a good question though. If the law is about intent, and your intent wasn't to cash in but to have fun. But later you decide to when it goes viral, are you ok?
@@username7763 The FAA rep has already said that if others use your non-107 footage for-profit then they will get fined & not you. Posting your recreational footage that might go viral is not illegal, though if your intent is to get 10k views then you probably should get a 107.
I say, as long as you don't fly it near a city or over government property . Or an airport. And you go down The second you hear anything that sounds like a plane it's ok
There is a video out here where a guy asks whether he should disarm the motors on his drone if he loses video reception flying FPV. Doing so would cause the aircraft to simply fall out of the sky potentially damaging property or injuring somebody. There are reasons for having regulations.
@@BrjanBuckmaster well if I didn't have GPS I would put that into consideration and not fly it out of sight and Make sure I have plenty of battery life Left to make the trip back or never fly beyond the signal range
@@BrjanBuckmaster honestly though I think the only reason why they have those rules is to stop drones from interfering with other aircraft because technically we already have rules in place that penalize people for something like that or to stop from people flying drones into places they shouldn't be flying them in
Really curious how the "intent" of it being recreational can be exactly determined in court. Sounds like an extreme grey area. Who exactly is going to enforce whether or not I use a skyline shot of a city or a forest I've already shot on my own time, in a film I'm being paid to make. I OWN the copyright, how exactly can a court determine whether I'm doing it for commercial purposes unless there is a client on a contract PAYING for drone services specifically? It seems like an extremely vague argument.
So I'm a music composer and wish to shoot landscapes, Coastlines etc to place in a music video that I am creating. So I'm assuming I need the 107 to do so......What crazy rules I have to say! I'm taking as many certifications I can just so I don't get myself in trouble....
Hii i will be visiting United States. I have Mini 4 Pro and Mavic 3 Pro and I have European registration and Insurance for drone. am i allowed to fly drone in U.S? or i also need Registration ID from US?
What if you are flying to make videos for fun for RUclips that is not monetized at all and literally it’s just for fun of making videos to share your hobby. Would that still be recreational or do I need a part 107 and a later on my channel gets to where I can monetize and I get in trouble for those videos after it becomes monetized if it does.
I have a small drone, less than 249 grams but can't find a place to fly it, can't fly it in the city, i try to go to the unpopulated areas and everything is fenced and it's private property. Maybe one of these days i'll take a trip where i can find a place to fly it and take videos of boring hills. What i see from other people flying drones is that they don't care about the rules, they just fly their drones everywhere, over people, over houses.
Thanks for the info. I live near Long Beach Ca. When I open the map for flying drones. All I see is restricted no fly zones. I can even fly at very large parks!! Why is this??
@@philipph80 That's sad because I used to do that all the time. I tell you I used to find some weird things in the ocean where I live using a drone some of which I get a feeling I the gooberman doesn't want me to see
Quick question about LAANC. I have a friend you lives in class D airspace, so close to the airport that automatic LAANC cannot be granted (zero agl). There is however a waiver that can be applied for. Has this ever been granted? You have to apply through dronezone …
All this bullcrap and planes flying over houses falling ontop of houses planes landing on highway and people dying and thats ok im going to fly my drone my way no rules for me
i was stopped by the FAA on the 4th of July. and they told be that you have to see the drone at all time and that you can't even look at your controller at all, no matter how brief
@@PilotInstitute i said that to them( there was like 4 people plus a supervisor) but he kept saying that he knew the rules better than me (since he literally worked for the FAA) i guess thats why i never got the letter in the mail
If you fly in that area still then clip the FAA Rep talking about VLOS here on YT. They should be allowing you to use the Drone as it was intended to be used by the manufacture. If you can't look down at the controller then how do you check any flight settings or change settings like the home-point, you need a body-cam to record those bullies I guess. Imagine them being on a plane & having the pilot not check any of the buttons or switches, lol.
This is somewhat confusing as on the FAA's website it says "If you use First Person View or similar technology, you must have a visual observer always keep your drone within unaided sight (for example, no binoculars)." www.faa.gov/newsroom/small-unmanned-aircraft-systems-uas-regulations-part-107 FPV doesn't just mean goggles as a screen on a controller would be considered FPV. But when you read the actual language in the law it doesn't specifically mention FPV, it just has the line about being "be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to:" So the two pieces of information kind of contradict each other. My controller has FPV as it has a screen and I am looking at that most of the flight. So if I am planning on using my screen I always have a Visual Observer. Love to have someone from the FAA discuss this with PI in a video to clear up any misunderstandings.
This is somewhat confusing as on the FAA's website it says "If you use First Person View or similar technology, you must have a visual observer always keep your drone within unaided sight (for example, no binoculars)." FPV doesn't just mean goggles as a screen on a controller would be considered FPV. There is a date of October 6, 2020 on the article, but it was the first page that came up in a search result. Can't put the link in as it will get flagged by RUclips that will restrict this message from posting. But when you read the actual language in the law it doesn't specifically mention FPV, it just has the line about being "be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to:" So the two pieces of information kind of contradict each other. My controller has FPV as it has a screen and I am looking at that most of the flight. So if I am planning on using my screen I always have a Visual Observer. Love to have someone from the FAA discuss this with PI in a video to clear up any misunderstandings.
@@PilotInstitute thanks! I just took the trust test on your site and got my certificate, thanks! I’m going to Kauai, Hawaii in a couple weeks and I just got the dji mini 4 pro drone, and I don’t want to get in trouble using it.
I know this is in some cbo rules somewhere but you really should have mentioned oop. People flying over crowds and highways filled with moving vehicles is the number one law i see people break. Its shocking how many people dont know this.
@@philipph80heres your original comment if anyones interested. “i love to fly over houses and free ways, especially at night.... that is the only reason for me to buy drone”
Well I am glad the Chevron deference is being reigned in, and I am not a fan of all the FAA rules, it would seem a difficult case to make that they are exceeding their authority given the federal statue that instructed them to do this. Is there a particular regulation you have in mind that you believe exceeds their authority?
Would you still need to get authorization in a controlled airspace it you're only going to fly a drone 10 to 15 feet high? For example, if you just want to practice or learn how to use the controller and it's settings. There's a nice open park in my area which is in a controlled airspace, and I just want to get familiar with the drone and the settings on the controller. The drone in question would be the dji mavic 3 pro btw.
It is broadcasting RID & you'd need it to be Registered so I would not fly without authorization. The cities already have a drone-reader that can identify violators automatically using RID.
Just check B4UFLY, or similar. It will show how high you can fly in controlled airspace or if you can fly at all. A great resource and should be a preflight checklist thing anyway. You can drop a pin on the map and it will give you any warnings, restrictions or advisories for that location.
The AMA primarily focuses on fixed wing aircraft and have historically not been very supportive of multi rotors. Our customers are mostly mutirotor pilots who will find more appropriate guidelines in the other 3 CBOs for their style of operations.
Understood, thank you. I asked because of the four CBOs, I thought the AMA's graphic user interface was the best designed and most user friendly. I also noticed that at the higher level, the four CBOs had very similar guidelines, although some had details that seemed overly cumbersome.@@PilotInstitute
@@PilotInstitute Did that change recently? When I looked into the rules last year it was verboten. You needed part 107 to fly at night along with blinking lights.
Rules... If only I had the guts to break these.. but I don't like to get into trouble... So I guess I have to follow these rules then... or maybe I should just fly micro drones.
Recording aerial footage for your church you need exam, be aware of regulations, air space, charts, aeronautical decision makings, weather, emergency operations, aerodynamics etc. Recording the same footage for yourself you don't need any of that. Do the people creating these regulations know what logic is?
Question: I have a DJI Mini 4 Pro which I have not registered yet. I have not taken the Part 107 exam yet. Can I register myself as a recreational drone user now with my Mini 4 Pro for now, and then after passing the 107 exam, re-register my Mini 4 Pro for 'professional' use? It seems to be that a drone can only be registered as either or recreational use or professional use? Does that mean I have to have two separate drones, if I change from being a recreatioanal user to professional user? Thanks!
@pilotinstitute What is your problem with not recommending the AMA (academy of model aeronautics) as a CBO? They were almost wholly responsible for the recreational drone rules that were accepted by the FAA! without their advocacy the FAA rules would have been SO much more restrictive!
They were but they also never opposed remote ID when they had a seat at the table and now all the FRIAs approved for them are pay-to-play, meaning they do nothing to help the average flyer. The other CBOs are working to make this hobby, including multirotors, more accessible to everyone, including Flite Test working with STEAM programs and schools. This is why we recommend them more than the AMA.
The FAA has more problems with commercial airliners falling out of the sky or doors blowing open or airplanes running into each other at airport than watching little Johnny fly his drone in his back yard. They have bigger fish to fry.
If the court tosses Chevron there will definitely be challenges to at least some of these regulations. The ones made from ambiguous directives in the statute.
@@RebelByNaturean example would be if congress says make reasonable regulations for recreational pilots. What's reasonable? That's ambiguous. Did the FAA come up with the best interpretation. Its complicated.
@RebelByNature Congress told the faa to create regulations for commercial drone operations. The FAA interpretation of that as anything in furtherance of a business is commercial. Even a monetized RUclips channel of your tiny whoop flights in your back yard. I'm pretty sure that's not what Congress intended, and it isn't the best interpretation of the statute. The courts are required to defer to the federal agency when things are ambiguous. Unless the Supreme Court gets rid of the Chevron deference doctrine.
@@mattalford3932 I'll be applauding if and when Chevron deference is struck down. Even if it is, don't think it will help you in the case of monetized YT channel. It means you are getting paid and that is commerce. I don't like the rule. I don't like that they even treat treat you differently if you make a buck. It's not like it's about carrying passengers or cargo. None the less, congress treated recreational differently than commercial and a monetized channel is commerce, so don't see how the downfall of Chevron Deference will affect this.
Spent 30 years dealing with the FDA in manufacturing/research. Then onto FCC for amateur radio license, 3 tests for license and one additional for volunteer examiner. Just starting to dive into the world of FAA. All I really want to do is fly in my backyard and my family’s 10 acre pasture in the north GA mountains. I continuously challenge myself so I will study for the 60 question test. Keeps the grey matter young.
N GA is beautiful, sucks I can’t fly near the Yonah, Blood or Brasstown Bald.
I am a videographer and I have often been tempted to buy a drone; however, I don’t have confidence in law enforcement to be reasonable in this area. I have witnessed helicopters harassing wildlife in National Parks and giving climbers illegal access to climbing routes. I’m sure that these people never faced any consequences.
Tell us your a liberal with our telling us...
I fly my drone where I want, how I want and when I want.
If you want to film something, fly it from away from the area you want to film.
This way, nobody can harass you with all of the bs laws.
Do you need a tissue?
After being on the fence regarding buying a DJI mini drone, I have been convinced that it is just too much trouble to partake in this hobby. Unlocking a DJI drone to fly even in low risk situations is just simply too much of a hassle. Good luck to all of you in the future as the U.S. government continues to make this hobby harder and harder to pursue.
Who wants to fly when they change the rules every year and add requirements without adding safety, sounds like Spyware to me.
why? its the least restrictive and easy to fly drone
@TucsonAgentBond probably because it is a toy regulated and viewed to be more dangerous than a gun? Maybe, that the rules are ever changing? Who wants to be harrased by some lady who says "you can't be here," with no support from the regulating body.
@@Narnald_Ewmanhave you ever owned a dirt bike or a skateboard🤣 or any other recreational device for that matter? If you can’t handle ignorant people possibly talking to you I guess just continue to stay inside
Get an older one and buy NLD... problem solved
Wow. It's just amazing how they can get involved to regulate something and turn it into a complete nightmare.
Especially something that had such an amazing safety record in the first place
People flying drones into airplanes, drones crashing into crowds at sporting events, drones interfering with firefighting aircraft, and drone creepers started to become news just prior to these rules being enacted.
And when the rules and the automated flight restrictions went into effect, most of these problems went away. Mandatory testing for commercial use also helped ensure that people know how to fly safely.
And to be fair - it’s not like the rules didn’t exist before the FAA started enforcing them. It’s just that hobby pilots followed them voluntarily as part of their AMA insurance.
The thing is - before drone tech, we flew as part of clubs, because club owned airfields were the easiest, safest place to fly our expensive hobby aircraft.
But when hobby aircraft flying suddenly got cheap and easy, people started flying without doing any research and started getting into trouble. And when people do stupid stuff, that’s when the rules start.
So don’t blame The Man. Blame the idiots who bought hobby drones, didn’t read up on the accepted operating practices, and just did “whatever” with them.
If your broke just say your broke cause you can’t afford one. These guidelines are easier than driving regulations
I call BS. As a lifetime RC hobbyist for more than 40 years I can tell similar regulations were always around. Decades ago flying RC models was a niche hobbyist gladly complied with regulations as they recognized the risks. Nowadays remote controlled drones and airplanes have become so easily available and commonplace that too many immature and incompetent people can get their hands on them and pose a risk in public places.
Welcome to the new Amerika
Thank you folks for making this simple. I've been delaying taking the training on account of the language and law surrounding drone operation being very... odd. The FAA has not laid out the material in a very straightforward manner.
Why is it that I feel like those of us who fly just for fun are getting hosed harder and harder. And it's going to just keep getting worse the next few years.
You are noticing patterns.
I have been flying RC since 1973. I learned in East Germany from a bunch of outstanding German modelers who gave me my first balsa model. Didn't know what it was because it looked like a hundred people had learned to fly with it and had crashed it and rebuilt it. Those were the days. Sorry to have taken up your time. Take care be safe.
People need to stop voting for democrats. They love noting more than fining and banning.
The government wants to punish and tax, to ensure that only certain corporate interests have access to RC aircraft and UAS technology.
@@ironroad18 or in other words, too many bureaucrats and corporations screwing u and me out of our freedoms
I passed my Part 107 on the second try yesterday because of you brother, Just wanted to say thank you so much.. the class was worth every penny.
Please how did you do it hlep
I can fly my drone but I can't my camera
Thanks for the update. I'm glad to see PI is still providing the nice registration stickers.
Over 30,000 of them out there in the wild!
I didn't think they would be providing them still for over two years, but I definitely appreciate it.♥
Every time I see one of these videos so much gets added to recreational drone flying, it's almost like the FAA wants to keep people out of the sky.
Rather keep people out of making money. Monetizing footage is dangerous. Giving the same video for free makes it safe!
When I was flying back in 2015, it felt like I was the only one in my state who had one. Since then my drones have just sat on the shelf. Things are so different now.
So . . . registration is required UNLESS the drone is 249g or less?
Why do you skim over that exception?
Just buy and fly. Don't worry about big brother.
Until you get busted and have to pay a fine.
You're a sheep.@@BrjanBuckmaster
@@BrjanBuckmaster Don't fly in areas that are heavily guarded or places you shouldn't go and don't be uploading videos of you flying beyond the line of sight to RUclips That's another. Sure. Fine way to get caught
This is the best source of information I've found. I've not purchased a drone yet because of all the rules and regulations. One question: for recreational, I can't fly in national parks? Seems a little odd....
If you fly enough you'll notice that during migrations the feral birds really do not enjoy drones. I imagine some nesting spots in some of those forests would change the bird behavior. Some environmentally-hazardous areas use drones to scare birds away for safety so you don't want drones everywhere birds nest.
Waiting on my regiatration stickers from you been almost 2 wlweeks... Hopefully its in the mailbox today. Fingers crossed.. also alomst done with.107 course yay🎉
If you don't get them, let us know, we'll investigate.
You know what’s weird, the faa has more authority over an rc plane than they do over a manned ultralight aircraft
Pilot Institute is awesome! (and no, I’m not employed by or in any way financially compensated by Pilot Institute) 😅
"don't fly during an NFL game, in a National Park, or in Washington D.C..." 😉
Sorry, couldn't resist. Awesome video content as always. Kuddos to you and your team.
Thanks for the video! Now that I know the rules, I know to break only some of them, and just use common sense to stay safe, instead of over-nannied.
Starting to regret getting back into the hobby with how annoying they've made it. I need to take a 107 test to sell a picture to a local business that wanted it, but I DON'T because that business is owned by my uncle and I just gave it to him, and he gave me $30 because he's a cool guy? Or I'm taking a video for social media and the drone is 8 feet off the ground in my own back yard, I need to take a 107 test? Yeah, nothing more than government wanting to be involved in more of my business when it doesn't concern them. I'm sure being 405 feet in the air over the miles and miles of farmlands and crop fields I live near is extremely dangerous to....someone.
Looking up one of the rules about historical sites was that you could get permission to fly and take pictures if it was to promote the site...what? Has no one thought that they want to see the site from an aerial view because it's just a neat thing? Oh wait, that means they aren't making money off you for something.
I am doing studyies currently for my 107 , though it is a 60 question test there is 320 practice exam questions these faa test can cover making studies more difficult. Though my practice exams are all scoring between 93 to 100% it is the other questions i m having comcerens with at the moment. Hopefully i will be ready for the exam in a few weeks while getting more familiar with my drones i currently own. I just started to learn how to fly and looking forward to get proficient with them. Yesterday's flight was totally amazing!
We have the leading part 107 course in the country if you need help. Helped nearly 90,000 pilots now get ready for the exam. Self studying can be tough since you don’t know what you don’t know. Plus our course is so much more than a test prep course. www.pilotinstitute.com/course/part-107-remote-pilot/
@@PilotInstitute ..,.. it has been tough so far in specific areas only however I have spent the enrollment fee with another company before I known of yours. So far with their materials and materials found online, I am averaging 95% accuracy as of now. Besides the 107 however, of course I am enjoying the studies therefore, I would like to consider additional courses related to the field.
We will be regulating kids doing jumps on there bikes soon because they are in the air space.
Bingo
I'll follow all these rules except the needing a visual observer when using FPV. Thats just incredibly unrealistic to have someone on standby watching me fly a damn drone.
I can summarize every single purpose that gov rules/restrictions are created with ONE WORD, and it is NOT for the security of “We The People”!
“Control”
I sympathize with your frustration. The arbitrariness of the rules certainly makes me feel that way at times. Flying a drone can be dangerous and I want the government to have rules around it. But the way they've done it is counterproductive.
I took the (TRUST) test this afternoon and passed it easy. Most of the subject matter was familiar to me. Now I can fly my MINI 2 with peace of mind and legit. Now time to study for part 107
Thank you “Pilot Institute” you guys rock! 🤘🏼
This video is an instrumental reminder and a good training tool for younger pilots. I've shared it with my kids a few times already since I got them into drone flying a few weeks ago. Two question thoughs.... you only mention National Parks once during rule 10. I reside in rural Alaska with a few airports and airstrips nearby. It's one of those "if you're out of town and not near population, you're good -ish" kinds of things. The first question is this is the first i've heard of national parks being restricted airspace, as my UAS app doesn't mark this and our Wildlife Troopers have said its good. Is there a reference point you can share for this??? Secondly, on the concept of recreation, I've been asked a few times by Search and Rescue folks who know i have drones and have good xp of the area (because of recreational nature filming) to help find lost people from time to time, even "on the spot" kinds of things, example is i'm out filming me fishing and the S&R friends go "hey can you help us find a lost hiker?" Now the good Samaritan and neighbor in me packs up and takes the time to help them, however the question is does this cross into Part 107, and should I refuse going forward because I do not yet have my 107 license??? Thanks in advance.
Good video, but I have a question. In the video you mention that you are not allowed to fly over sporting events, in Washington DC, and in national parks. And you reference Air Aware as a good app for checking where you can fly or for getting LAANC approval. I noticed however, that if I put a pin inside the boundaries of Great Smokey Mountain National Park it does not say restricted, just cautionary air space, and the note says to check with the Park Service before flying...........does that mean you can get permission to fly there? If I go to Grand Canyon NP instead, it does show restricted in the app.
I always hated government rules and bureaucracy because they make the regulations too hard for anyone to possibly understand! I bought a drone under 250 grams, and I am assuming that I don't need to do anything with the FAA. I think the only rules which pertain to me is that I should keep the altitude below 400 feet and have a line of sight. I am going to say, if the government gets mad at me, let them try to fine and imprison me, as I don't have very much anyway and they won't get anything from me! I will post the drone videos to my RUclips channel... RUclips would never allow me to monetize anyway because I refuse to tell lies to the brainwashed sheeple!
If you fly on an open airspace without any regulation you can fly far from the line of sight rule, many recreational drone flyers fly their drones at its maximum distance meaning zero line of sight and just rely on the camera transmission perfectly legal.
CBO…what is the point of these? If they are an organization that makes rules for pilots to folllow which are approved by the FAA, then why doesn’t the FAA just cut out the middle man and give the rules directly to pilots. They already do that with other rules. Why do the CBOs need to exist at all?
They want to pretend to be the authority while allowing other people to deny your licensed toy flying .
CBO's are gatekeeping organizations of self righteous hobbyists that what some form of power over you. No different than HOAs.
Good grief, now I know why I quit flying drones five years ago
Do I have to register my drone which is 8 ounces 🤔 and thx for the information
How can they regulate homemade drones? Can't operators just use modified aircraft and open source flight software like ArduPilot? I just don't see how they can stop that unless it's built into electronics like the DJI.
Laws are only effective if people respect them. We no longer have any reason to respect them.
The same way they regulate driving. You can drive without a license, insurance, or registration. If you get in trouble, it's MUCH bigger trouble. You could also simply be reported, and the FAA takes that seriously.
I’ll tell you what if I was flying recreational and somebody said their kids lost in the woods I wouldn’t hesitate to bring my drone up up and away .I wouldn’t worry about no 107. Lives life Are more important than the rules.
Yes
It’s one thing to do this in an emergency. Lives in danger trump regulatory rules like this.
But if you join a SAR group, participate in exercises, and prepare for such an event, that’s a different story.
@@tomwilson2112which is also funny because if you seen the test for 107 it's nothing even remotely useful for the typical SAR drone operator because you aren't taking off at an airport to go 30,00ft off the ground or anything 😂
And honestly I doubt any president micro manages these agencies except for extreme circumstances, the people working there probably make suggestions and the executive staff are probably like "fine whatever"
It is the absolute and ONLY purpose of government to make EVERYTHING about our lives as difficult as possible.
No, you fool. Government’s purpose is to make everyone’s life, collectively, as good as it can be. That means we each give up some small freedoms so all of society can benefit. The needs of many outweigh the needs of the few. Smarten up!
Is EVERYTHING about your life difficult due to the government? EVERYTHING? If so, that's your world. Don't put that on me or anyone else. And you did that by using the word "our". I have a lot of easy parts of my life that the government doesn't make difficult. Please chill out with the exaggeration. Please.
Sadly, this is becoming much more true every day. The rules as they are are fine.
However, when you add to the mix individuals that are flaming ignorant racist trying to ban everything that isn't American made (cause American made products don't siphon are info either😊) just because they're late in understanding how it works, or are just to idiotic to understand, then it makes you wonder why these individuals are still on power when they're so clearly just bored.
Ps: don't mind the children who commented in favor of the government. Some kids just don't know when their parents are smothering them and think that they just care or are to scared to challenge them if you catch my drift.
Hmmm…..Hyperbole much?
No it's everyone that ruins it for everyone else that causes such regulations. People doing stupid things. There are consequences for everything you do, good or bad. Remember this and you might have a better outlook in life 👍
its crazy how much control ppl give up to big brother, while they use drones and other surveillance equipment to monitor use with no oversight
So would you prefer the FAA be hands off and let someone else regulate drones? Would you prefer that there are no regulations for drone operation?
Imagine sitting down at one of the many benches around Old Faithful in Yellowstone waiting for the geyser to pop along with 1000 other people while a dozen of more drones fly overhead, perhaps crashing into one another and then falling on the 1000 people below. Imagine this problem being the province of lawyers when private individuals sue you for flying near them? Now imagine that there is no regulatory body that can step in to thwart that lawsuit since you followed the rules they, the FAA, have outlined. Imagine driving down the highway and sharing the road with people weaving in and out of traffic and otherwise endangering the mooring public and there are no cops to limit the activities of the nut jobs driving like entitled idiots.
I find it sad that many people think the world would be a better place if there were no rules and no rule makers!
The thing is people do Weave in and out of traffic. There are no cops to do anything they don’t care.
We are now regulated to the point that I will no longer follow the regulations and just use my own judgement to keep safe
It's only 10 rules, and they are pretty basic and easy to comply with.
Comply? Easy? I've been flying for over a decade and have never once flown at a club or anywhere else that would now be considered a CBO. I've had no desire to do so and I just won't do that. Thousands of us live in areas that don't have such facilities and some of us wouldn't care to fly at them if we did. This is the United States and I won't be showing my papers or any other BS if I feel like I can fly my tiny little foam airplane safely like I has always done@@PilotInstitute
Comply? Easy? There is no CBO anywhere near where I fly. I've never flown it a club and have no desire to. I can drive 4 miles and miles and never see another car or here or see an airplane. The regulations don't seem like they were made for some of the states with low populations. And I was going to say that I'll just continue to be a renegade but I will do so in a common sense and safe manner. But upon thinking about it further, I'm just going to quit. Right now. I only have one small plane so I think it's a good time to get out of the hobby. It's been fun but the regulations in my opinion are ridiculous. Things have changed a lot, FPV can be done a lot safer yet they still have the line of sight requirement. I'll just find something else to do, it's time to move on in any way. I never stick with the same hobby for too long. I'm sure I can find someone to take my drone off my hands@@PilotInstitute
@@PilotInstitute Remote ID makes no sense. $300+ part for a $50 drone. Also it broadcasts your location for anyone wanting to come and rob you, or troll you as you are flying.
@@ab7rs The Gov ruined all of my hobbies. No chance that they are gonna stop me from this. Enough is enough.
Thanks for the free stickers!
Thanl you. Very useful video 😊 Do all these rules also apply to the relatively new mini selfie drone HoverAir X1? It weighs 125 grams and it follows you visually without the need of a controller. It can only be up til 30 ft from you.
nobody follows line of sight
@@timewizard13 it's sad of how many people actually get away with that too I've seen a lot of people do that
😂 they want you to have a wifi Walmart drone
@@1Kyng2Wheels thankfully I don't have that
What about the hover drones that dont fly high or far at all and is autonomous ?
What's the deal with national park? Why can't we fly drones there?
If the rules had been sensible I would probably respect them. Catch me if you can.
Yep
Going to pimp this out on my IG, a lot of local pilots could really benefit from it IMO. Thanks for the refresher, Greg.
Great job again breaking it all down!
When the eclipse happens here in Houston we will be 90% effected.
I thought I would take my DJI Mavic 2 Zoom and go up about 250-300' and park it there videoing the skyline of downtown Houston.
Other people may have ideas on doing something like this.
Good idea!
Is it optional the trust test or it is mandatory? Thank you for your help. I am researching before buying a dji mini 4 pro fly more combo
Mandatory.
Basically drones are illegal in the US. Anyone who uses one is going to get a fine eventually. The question is when.
I own a large property watched by security cameras often I see something on the camera I want to go check out but it's safer to send the drone to take a look. Am I not allowed to do this?
Not technically but…
I’d fly fly fly
We the people allow it lol f the feds
Over your own property and you're not posting the video or monetizing it I wouldn't lose sleep over it. Unless you turn yourself in. :)
You forgot to mention local regulations, which are way stricter then the FAA. Hell in Mesa, AZ where i live you cant tech fly your drone anywhere, besides a single park called Basin 115. I would say local municipalities are going out of their way to ruin drone flying nation wide. Just bought a drone, am already regretting it. If you want to stay "legal" there a lot more then 10 rules.
Bingo
100% no one is using remote ID
Really??
its glaringly obvious some of these rules are less about being responsible and looking out for others and more about making peoples jobs easier. DJI drones disappear after just 50ft because its a tiny grey plastic rectangle. Monitoring flights in my home county has never showed a flight below 28,000ft yet Im limited to 400ft? Not being able to fly over people or cars instantly makes 1/3rd of what ive seen on instagram illegal. Its sad that how the drone hobby got picked at over the years. I had a mini 2 and was looking to get back into but there is nothing you CAN do with these anymore
Thank you for sharing with us in this video, very thorough. Which's why I like to give you a like sign and subscribed your channel.
Why I sold them all
I will never surrender to this
omg I live here in Los Angeles and today is August 5th 2024. Here I was thinking let me buy a drone and fly it right away but all these rules are a turn off. I understand safety but still 😨😨😨
Ive only managed to break 8 out of 10. Ill try harder...
Part 107 is kinda comical. Pretty much nothing is on that test that a drone pilot needs to know. Now if I'm flying a drone from a runway at the airport to 30k feet then sure. Air density might play a role and charts might play a role. It's really just the government getting their 1/2 of your income if you go that way.
Your slides for part 107 are outdataed on some key points but you’re not alone, a lot of videos for Part 107 on YT are never updated.
Nothing outdated in this video. We posted it a few months ago.
Can you post video to a youtube channel that isnt monetized?
Rules, rules, rules.
Some of the rules are very good and important. But it is intermixed with strange arbitrary rules too. The rules keep on changing.
@@username7763make the rules as complicated as possible, so that nobody understands them. Flying to a max height of 400 ft in the middle of no where makes no sense. Drone’s could be fitted with a transponder activated as soon as they fly above 400ft, 🆔 them as a flying drone, to other aircraft.
Don’t be daft, that’s to sensible. 😉👍
As long as your youtube channel is not monetized, then it is recreational
Not really. If it's monetized it's part 107. If it's not monetized, it doesn't necessarily mean it is recreational.
You specifically stated flying to post video on a "monetized" RUclips channel is not accessible when flying recreationally. This would seem to imply flying under these rules is permissible, and posting videos on a "non-monitized" RUclips channel is acceptable. Is this correct?
As long as the intent of the flight was recreational, you could post to a non-monetized channel.
Yes but you can't cash in if your video goes viral.
What if your intent is only for recreation when you decided to fly and later you decide to post to a youtube channel. Does that make the perfectly legal flight suddenly illegal in the past? I'd have to understand why posting videos to youtube is considered dangerous flying I guess. Is posting to rumble considered safe by the FAA?
@@SlackerU That's a good question though. If the law is about intent, and your intent wasn't to cash in but to have fun. But later you decide to when it goes viral, are you ok?
@@username7763 The FAA rep has already said that if others use your non-107 footage for-profit then they will get fined & not you. Posting your recreational footage that might go viral is not illegal, though if your intent is to get 10k views then you probably should get a 107.
I say, as long as you don't fly it near a city or over government property . Or an airport. And you go down The second you hear anything that sounds like a plane it's ok
There is a video out here where a guy asks whether he should disarm the motors on his drone if he loses video reception flying FPV. Doing so would cause the aircraft to simply fall out of the sky potentially damaging property or injuring somebody. There are reasons for having regulations.
Well first off who in their right mind would do that you would completely destroy their drone doing that and drones cost money
@@whitepaperkat67 What would you do in that situation if you didn’t have GPS?
@@BrjanBuckmaster well if I didn't have GPS I would put that into consideration and not fly it out of sight and Make sure I have plenty of battery life Left to make the trip back or never fly beyond the signal range
@@whitepaperkat67 That’s the motivation behind the FAA rule to keep your aircraft within sight. Either by the PIC or VO.
@@BrjanBuckmaster honestly though I think the only reason why they have those rules is to stop drones from interfering with other aircraft because technically we already have rules in place that penalize people for something like that or to stop from people flying drones into places they shouldn't be flying them in
Great information, and very helpful for new pilots, and even for some people who have been flying for awhile. Thanks for sharing.
Really curious how the "intent" of it being recreational can be exactly determined in court. Sounds like an extreme grey area. Who exactly is going to enforce whether or not I use a skyline shot of a city or a forest I've already shot on my own time, in a film I'm being paid to make. I OWN the copyright, how exactly can a court determine whether I'm doing it for commercial purposes unless there is a client on a contract PAYING for drone services specifically?
It seems like an extremely vague argument.
And you know two because this is an executive agency "rule" You will get no rule of lenity in the interpretation. Unbelievable we let it get this bad.
So I'm a music composer and wish to shoot landscapes, Coastlines etc to place in a music video that I am creating. So I'm assuming I need the 107 to do so......What crazy rules I have to say! I'm taking as many certifications I can just so I don't get myself in trouble....
Hii i will be visiting United States. I have Mini 4 Pro and Mavic 3 Pro and I have European registration and Insurance for drone. am i allowed to fly drone in U.S? or i also need Registration ID from US?
What if you are flying to make videos for fun for RUclips that is not monetized at all and literally it’s just for fun of making videos to share your hobby. Would that still be recreational or do I need a part 107 and a later on my channel gets to where I can monetize and I get in trouble for those videos after it becomes monetized if it does.
I have a small drone, less than 249 grams but can't find a place to fly it, can't fly it in the city, i try to go to the unpopulated areas and everything is fenced and it's private property. Maybe one of these days i'll take a trip where i can find a place to fly it and take videos of boring hills. What i see from other people flying drones is that they don't care about the rules, they just fly their drones everywhere, over people, over houses.
So regardless of drone weight, even less than 250g, if you’re flying commercially you must have the part 107?
Thanks for the info. I live near Long Beach Ca. When I open the map for flying drones. All I see is restricted no fly zones. I can even fly at very large parks!! Why is this??
@@charlie90501 drones are banned in California
how about fly over the ocean....not allow too?
@@philipph80 That's sad because I used to do that all the time. I tell you I used to find some weird things in the ocean where I live using a drone some of which I get a feeling I the gooberman doesn't want me to see
Pretty sure there was yet another drone flight during an NFL playoff game lions versus San Francisco.
Can canadian citizens fly drones under 250g in the USA ?
We must pass the TRUST test as well ?
Will Skydio drones need the FAA to eventually change the line of sight rule?
Quick question about LAANC. I have a friend you lives in class D airspace, so close to the airport that automatic LAANC cannot be granted (zero agl).
There is however a waiver that can be applied for. Has this ever been granted? You have to apply through dronezone …
FAA has made flying no fun and my drone worthless in 2024
Cuz flying near airports and endangering others was your fun?
Bingo
All this bullcrap and planes flying over houses falling ontop of houses planes landing on highway and people dying and thats ok im going to fly my drone my way no rules for me
i was stopped by the FAA on the 4th of July. and they told be that you have to see the drone at all time and that you can't even look at your controller at all, no matter how brief
They were unfortunately incorrect. You can absolutely look at your controller as long as, if you look up, you can see the drone.
@@PilotInstitute i said that to them( there was like 4 people plus a supervisor) but he kept saying that he knew the rules better than me (since he literally worked for the FAA) i guess thats why i never got the letter in the mail
If you fly in that area still then clip the FAA Rep talking about VLOS here on YT. They should be allowing you to use the Drone as it was intended to be used by the manufacture. If you can't look down at the controller then how do you check any flight settings or change settings like the home-point, you need a body-cam to record those bullies I guess. Imagine them being on a plane & having the pilot not check any of the buttons or switches, lol.
This is somewhat confusing as on the FAA's website it says "If you use First Person View or similar technology, you must have a visual observer always keep your drone within unaided sight (for example, no binoculars)." www.faa.gov/newsroom/small-unmanned-aircraft-systems-uas-regulations-part-107 FPV doesn't just mean goggles as a screen on a controller would be considered FPV.
But when you read the actual language in the law it doesn't specifically mention FPV, it just has the line about being "be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to:" So the two pieces of information kind of contradict each other.
My controller has FPV as it has a screen and I am looking at that most of the flight. So if I am planning on using my screen I always have a Visual Observer.
Love to have someone from the FAA discuss this with PI in a video to clear up any misunderstandings.
This is somewhat confusing as on the FAA's website it says "If you use First Person View or similar technology, you must have a visual observer always keep your drone within unaided sight (for example, no binoculars)." FPV doesn't just mean goggles as a screen on a controller would be considered FPV. There is a date of October 6, 2020 on the article, but it was the first page that came up in a search result. Can't put the link in as it will get flagged by RUclips that will restrict this message from posting.
But when you read the actual language in the law it doesn't specifically mention FPV, it just has the line about being "be able to see the unmanned aircraft throughout the entire flight in order to:" So the two pieces of information kind of contradict each other. My controller has FPV as it has a screen and I am looking at that most of the flight. So if I am planning on using my screen I always have a Visual Observer. Love to have someone from the FAA discuss this with PI in a video to clear up any misunderstandings.
Do you have to take the “TRUST” test even if the drone is under .55 pounds?
Yes. All rules apply to sub .55lbs drones, except for registration.
@@PilotInstitute thanks! I just took the trust test on your site and got my certificate, thanks! I’m going to Kauai, Hawaii in a couple weeks and I just got the dji mini 4 pro drone, and I don’t want to get in trouble using it.
I know this is in some cbo rules somewhere but you really should have mentioned oop. People flying over crowds and highways filled with moving vehicles is the number one law i see people break. Its shocking how many people dont know this.
can you fly in a residential area over houses?
what about over houses and free ways at night and turn off blinking light...completely stealth
@@philipph80heres your original comment if anyones interested. “i love to fly over houses and free ways, especially at night.... that is the only reason for me to buy drone”
I don't think the FAA regulations on drones will be very effective without Chevron deference.
Well I am glad the Chevron deference is being reigned in, and I am not a fan of all the FAA rules, it would seem a difficult case to make that they are exceeding their authority given the federal statue that instructed them to do this. Is there a particular regulation you have in mind that you believe exceeds their authority?
You should make it clear - already in the title - that this applies for the US
Would you still need to get authorization in a controlled airspace it you're only going to fly a drone 10 to 15 feet high? For example, if you just want to practice or learn how to use the controller and it's settings.
There's a nice open park in my area which is in a controlled airspace, and I just want to get familiar with the drone and the settings on the controller.
The drone in question would be the dji mavic 3 pro btw.
It is broadcasting RID & you'd need it to be Registered so I would not fly without authorization. The cities already have a drone-reader that can identify violators automatically using RID.
Thanks @@SlackerU
Just check B4UFLY, or similar. It will show how high you can fly in controlled airspace or if you can fly at all. A great resource and should be a preflight checklist thing anyway. You can drop a pin on the map and it will give you any warnings, restrictions or advisories for that location.
Why did you not also recommend Academy of Model Aeronautics as a CBO?
The AMA primarily focuses on fixed wing aircraft and have historically not been very supportive of multi rotors. Our customers are mostly mutirotor pilots who will find more appropriate guidelines in the other 3 CBOs for their style of operations.
Understood, thank you. I asked because of the four CBOs, I thought the AMA's graphic user interface was the best designed and most user friendly. I also noticed that at the higher level, the four CBOs had very similar guidelines, although some had details that seemed overly cumbersome.@@PilotInstitute
You forgot about not flying at night with recreational
You can fly at night as a recreational flyer.
@@PilotInstitute Did that change recently? When I looked into the rules last year it was verboten. You needed part 107 to fly at night along with blinking lights.
I only fly by one rule:
I do what I want.
Get rid of your dji nanny drones.
I got a potensic atom and I love it. I fly wherever I want to.
Rules...
If only I had the guts to break these..
but I don't like to get into trouble...
So I guess I have to follow these rules then...
or maybe I should just fly micro drones.
My registration stickers expired 2023 but I renewed them 2026. Do I get the ones from you guys?
Recording aerial footage for your church you need exam, be aware of regulations, air space, charts, aeronautical decision makings, weather, emergency operations, aerodynamics etc. Recording the same footage for yourself you don't need any of that. Do the people creating these regulations know what logic is?
The future is a boot stamping on our face
Drone manufacturers are claiming that drones weighting 249g do not need registration. Is the rule 249g inclusive or over 249g.
So, when flying over 400 feet, take the rfid out of the TOY.
You shouldn’t fly over 400 feet and you can’t turn remote ID on/off if it’s integrated in the drone.
Question:
I have a DJI Mini 4 Pro which I have not registered yet. I have not taken the Part 107 exam yet. Can I register myself as a recreational drone user now with my Mini 4 Pro for now, and then after passing the 107 exam, re-register my Mini 4 Pro for 'professional' use?
It seems to be that a drone can only be registered as either or recreational use or professional use? Does that mean I have to have two separate drones, if I change from being a recreatioanal user to professional user?
Thanks!
I was trying to fly at Angeles stadium and Disneyland and it was restricted 😩
Disneyland has a permanent flight restriction.
@@PilotInstitute I did Knott’s
ruclips.net/video/XT9XqmUGA-s/видео.htmlsi=I3-nQskke3nsSRlp
@pilotinstitute What is your problem with not recommending the AMA (academy of model aeronautics) as a CBO? They were almost wholly responsible for the recreational drone rules that were accepted by the FAA! without their advocacy the FAA rules would have been SO much more restrictive!
They were but they also never opposed remote ID when they had a seat at the table and now all the FRIAs approved for them are pay-to-play, meaning they do nothing to help the average flyer. The other CBOs are working to make this hobby, including multirotors, more accessible to everyone, including Flite Test working with STEAM programs and schools. This is why we recommend them more than the AMA.
Whenever you renew your registration will you keep the same registration number?
Yes!
The FAA has more problems with commercial airliners falling out of the sky or doors blowing open or airplanes running into each other at airport than watching little Johnny fly his drone in his back yard. They have bigger fish to fry.
So where exactly ARE all the links that you speak of?
When is somebody going to take the FAA to court for exceeding it's statutory authority when the Chevron Defference gets tossed by the Supreme Court?
If the court tosses Chevron there will definitely be challenges to at least some of these regulations. The ones made from ambiguous directives in the statute.
@@mattalford3932 which are the ambiguous ones? Not saying none of them are, not sure, but you must have one in mind.
@@RebelByNaturean example would be if congress says make reasonable regulations for recreational pilots. What's reasonable? That's ambiguous. Did the FAA come up with the best interpretation. Its complicated.
@RebelByNature Congress told the faa to create regulations for commercial drone operations. The FAA interpretation of that as anything in furtherance of a business is commercial. Even a monetized RUclips channel of your tiny whoop flights in your back yard. I'm pretty sure that's not what Congress intended, and it isn't the best interpretation of the statute. The courts are required to defer to the federal agency when things are ambiguous. Unless the Supreme Court gets rid of the Chevron deference doctrine.
@@mattalford3932 I'll be applauding if and when Chevron deference is struck down. Even if it is, don't think it will help you in the case of monetized YT channel. It means you are getting paid and that is commerce. I don't like the rule. I don't like that they even treat treat you differently if you make a buck. It's not like it's about carrying passengers or cargo. None the less, congress treated recreational differently than commercial and a monetized channel is commerce, so don't see how the downfall of Chevron Deference will affect this.
what if your older drone is under 250 grms but a remote id module is going to make it over the 250 grm limit for recreational use