Wow. The pilot flying, did a complete 180, rather than run off the end of the runway and into what might have been residential housing. Give that man a medal.
No, the rudder was hard left, he was trying to keep it straight, but the #2 reverser out and the tires loss of friction (you often get rubber reversion when wheels are locked and the rubber reverts to liquid from friction heat and the tire effectively hydroplanes on the rubber) so the ground loop was not intentional. Nonetheless, getting it down and still driving until the very end is kudos to the crew. They lived. Everything else is just stuff that can be replaced.
@@trunkmonkey9417 i saw the details you were referring to, you’re right, the manual reversion it’s a hell of a difficult maneuver, but they don’t simulate that type of phenomenon on the sim as it happens in the accident, you just use the pressure on the accumulator to brake the aircraft and that’s it
@Star Gazer who worship him . We only worship the God as for hazrat Muhammad pbuh and also Jesus Christ pbuh they are messanger of the the God no true believer worship them but we do respect and love them.
@@donaldstanfield8862 another clapped out dhl 757 aint worth saving. sorry thing was ready to be put down and put of it's misery which is what happened
Having a hydraulic failure is like managing a 60t aluminum tube with engines, maneuverability and some crucial flight components are just stripped from you like a candy is taken from a child. This crew did a hella of job.
@@outermarker5801 I think they had at least partial brakes judging from the tire smoke shortly before the runway excursion. It also suggests an antilock brake failure and differential braking leading to the “spin out”. The aircrew lived to fly another day. Well done guys.
@@richardbriscoe8563 Yeah, brakeless was tongue in cheek. Just meant hyd fail would contribute to the obvious braking issues in the clip. Glad the crew's ok, but as an Avgeek it hurts to watch this airplane meet it's end.
It wasn't. They had plenty of runway left. You can tell from the spoiler and rudder deflection, they where trying to keep it straight. They also only had right reverser operating due to the hydraulic failure, also nose wheel steering was inop. It was likely the asymmetric reverse that caused the aircraft to spin to the left.
For all those wondering the Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA. It was not a Qantas flight though.
Wow! First off the flight crew did a great job! I never knew a 757 could do a 180. I'm impressed by the fact that no one was hurt and everyone walked away!
Thanks for posting this. Glad the flight crew evac went safely, and in view of what happened to the rear fuselage glad that it was a cargo flight as that did not look good had there been rear seat passengers.
While this is the best case scenario I doubt there would've been very serious injuries had it been a passenger plane as it looked like quite a low speed crash and there have been cases in the past where the plane broke up into pieces but everyone managed to evacuate such as AF flight 358. Either way props to the crew.
Uh, not really. They got on the ground without any problem & they were able to bleed off enough ground speed to where when they finally did crash, it wasn't life threatening (to the pilots) & don't forget this is a Cargo Flight. At most there's probably 4 people. Depending on the 757/767 accommodations for relief crew, a DHL employee dead-heading somewhere, etc... More than likely just the 2 pilots were on board and it was clear by 0.54 that they were gonna walk away from this...the Aircraft wasn't going to make it, but that's another story
So glad that nose stayed up and there were no injuries or post fire.. It seemed like they couldn't stop, the crew did a great job in maintaining great control. Cheers
I agree. It looks like the brakes locked up from images of the skid marks at the end of the runway and it drifted. Sort of like what a car does when you pull the ebrake at speed
@@YYZ_Aviation2 I do know this i work for dhl express myself as a driver the plane had flight crew on who to my knowledge got off safely which is the only scenario dhl and all its staff will care truly about everything is insured and replaceable family members are not and we are always told by dhl to get the people home over anything else
And that my friends is how you do a 'Handbrake' turn! Total respect to the pilots for landing what can possibly have been a flying brick. Glad no one was hurt!
Lost hydraulics? jeez the fact they were able to land safely it's incredible by it self, hope they are ok and we can see an interview of the pilots in a near future!
can’t be a severe hydraulic faulure since Flaps, slats, spoilers and right reverser were all deployed and most brakes seemed to work, but anti skid seems to have failed.
You can see the tires skidding meaning he has some hydraulics but thrust reversers on both engines are not deployed. Flaps can go down on electric motors. Some of the spoiler boards are not up on the left wing and 1 only on the right wing.
Thanks for posting. I wonder why QANTAS had an aircraft on the ground at Costa Rica (see start of the video). I am glad the crew members made it out ok.
The QANTAS tail is an Embraer E-Jet E190 on a delivery flight from SBGP to Australia. Often uses MROC/SJO as a fuel stop enroute to SDM or BRO to OAK to HNL to Nandi or Majuro Atoll to Australia.
From other videos it looked like the aircraft slid into what might be a drainage area, i.e. an area much lower than the runway and taxiways, causing the fuselage to break but leaving the wings and engines mostly intact. Seeing how much the wheels and/or brakes were smoking I wouldn't be surprised if the right mains went flat.
If you look closely you can see that only right wing reverser is active and pilots apply full rudder to counter. Seems this was one of the reasons for the spin at the end - the spin probably even saved the pilots. In gliders you teach pilots to lay down one wing one landing when close to something to cartwheel on purpose and not crash into the object.
Good observation. Aside from runway length concerns, why even bother applying the thrust reversers? Or did they not expect this to happen? I guess we’ll find out in the accident report.
Right, I wonder if that combination, and the ditch, actually helped arrest the motion of the aircraft!? Time will reveal all. Thank God they are safe to tell the tale! That was quite a spin!!
@@tjweber You're gonna do everything you can to get stopped and reversers are an aid to that. I have no Boeing time but on the Airbus I fly a hydraulic failure can affect braking performance significantly (depending on which system fails) so I'd hazard to say it was a judgement call on the part of the crew.
They lost the left hydraulic system, which disabled the left thrust reverser, as well as the nosewheel steering. So with only the righthand reverser to help slow down, it’s going to want to pull the airplane to the right. Without steering, they tried to compensate with differential braking and they had control through most of the landing roll until the very end, when it looks like they could no longer maintain enough differential to keep the airplane on the runway.
Lose hydraulics you lose the use of thrust reversers. Notice they are not deployed... Then the antiskid system says that enough and locks up the one main gear and that is when the plane starts to drift sideways...
looks like they couldn't throttle back or cut the engines. Wheels are locked but plane slides off runway with the engines screaming even after it collapses on the ground
Depend on which system you lose. The B737 consist of 3 systems, A, B and Stby, and either system can power all the flight controls of the other. I guess the 757, which is newer, are built more like the same, most aircrafts is, and maybe even with a 3 system, beside stby.
B757 has three. Left, Center and Right. The right system powered by the EDP and an ACMP powers brakes and the Antiskid and also its respective reverser. Left system powered alternate brakes and its respective reverser also.
Coming back from the Middle East for discharge years ago, our C-141 lost primary hydraulics. Made a very hard landing in Saudi Arabia. We were prepared. Maintenance crew fixed it, continued to Madrid Spain, where it was redlined, and a replacement flown in the next day.
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
@@threeptlqyup The only thing you can't do is prove your statement. The DHL flight crew did an amazing job through training and professionalism - at least there is evidence for the training.
Is that a Qantas aircraft on the tarmac? Never knew they flew there... Thankfully no deaths, which is great.... always am amazed how pilots come with emergencies..
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
I think it's safe to say the pilot's underwear were neither dry nor empty. Glad they survived! - Former DHL delivery driver and flight ground crew member.
As an aviation mechanic, I can say there are several redundancies built into these aircrafts. And while I have never worked what looks like a 757, I do know they have a solid reputation. Edit: I just reread the title... Well at the least I can officially confirm it is a 757.
Why do i feel like pilots should have done 180 degree turn to the left side of plane if this was purely because of his skill? And isn't this like some wheel friction melting itself or hydraulic problems which cause this accident or something? Why is whole of comments praising their skill? Well i am not disrespecting pilots or crew. I respect them a lot too and I'm glad everyone is safe too. But these comments felt odd to me.
They said the right one was working, that may be why they yeeted into the ditch!? Plus, the brakes were locking, sad set of circumstances, glad the pilots are okay. They can find another aircraft!
We lost all hydraulics on a flight out of Denver. Airbus 320. Flight crew became terrified. Plane had no surface controls and plane could only turn by engine power. The pilots were porpoising the plane up and down using power and dropping the nose by cutting back power to lose altitude. Used the engines to turn us around and fly back to Denver so the plane would slide sideways vs. banking and making big circular turns. They got the landing gear down but had no hydraulic brakes. Just manual power to try to slow it down. We hit the runway going superfast! I thought for sure we weren't going to stop. The engines couldn't use reverse thrusters to help. Luckily the runway was massively long and the plane was able to finally slow down a couple miles along it. They had to tow us back to the gate and the flight crew and pilots got the hell out of the plane first as fast as they could as other crews got us unboarded. We had to wait a long time to get another flight home because that crew was too shaken up to fly again that night. I was calm the whole time but it must have been scarier for them than we realized or there was something more wrong than they wanted to tell us.
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
With no hydraulics, it's amazing they could do a 180 like that. Nice camera work. Most people shake their cameras to utter oblivion just filming a fully stationary lawn chair. (stationary!...not one being hurled around by a category 5 tornadocane)
Nice handbrake turn from the pilot, and fair play to him or her aswell, cosmetic damage, loss of licence, but planes integrity should be OK, all I know is well done
What happened? Lost hydraulics during flight so they knew the landing wasn't going to be nice. Everyone was aware of it and waiting. Great landing given the circumstances. The 2 Crew members are save.
They almost made it. If they had only skidded a little sooner... "Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing." -- Anonymous flight instructor.
@@stefantreff4706 Yeah, there is a saying among pilots that goes something like this: A good landing is any landing you can walk away from. If you can fly the airplane the next day it is an excellent landing.
A lot of opinions here. A 757 has 3 hydraulic systems. Lose one….usually not a big issue, but two can become more precarious. 1 system is enough to fly the plane (although sluggish). Slats/flaps were out, but I guess not fully extended and that increases the landing speed and thus the required stopping distance. A high altitude airport increases your landing speed even further! Why they chose to return to ‘high altitude’ San Jose and not, for example, to ‘sealevel’ Liberia (20 min away from San Jose) is a mystery to me and there are a lot of other questions that need to be answered. It looks like they went off around Kilo intersection and then there is still a few hundred meters of runway left. Left reverser is not deployed (which probably indicates a left hydraulic failure), but I think I hear the right reverser at full reverse. Was full reverse on one engine maintained too long so they lost directional control? Maybe. Wheels are smoking: a way too heavy landing weight sounds unlikely as they had only a short flight ahead of them. Antiskid u/s? Very very rare. There is a Power Transfer Unit between the R and L hydraulic system so slats/flaps, landing gear system and nosewheel steering still work. So then why did they go off? The investigation will tell in time what happened. Then we’ll see where the learning moments are. For now I’m glad everyone is ok.
Not a 757 guy but knowing aircraft certification requirements was discounting the “no hydraulics” verbiage. Bigger aircraft require more hydraulics and more sophistication which can lead to issues when things go south.
I've been flying jets for 20 years and no way I'd be flying an extra 20 minutes to Liberia with compromised hydraulics. I can't speak to Boeing performance but the landing distance assessment charts for the plane I fly show about a 500' increase in required landing distance for the roughly 3000' difference in elevation between Liberia and San Jose which is more than made up for by the additional 800' of runway available at San Jose. It's a wash.
Frank, I’ve got 35+ years under my belt with 22000+ hours. Mostly 747,767,777 and 787. A single hydraulic failure is not a big deal if you choose your options right. A single empty hydraulic system is not a time critical emergency. It is not getting any worse with time. However, returning to a high level airport with reduced landing flaps and tailwind can be ok but is less than ideal. When they decided to turn back Liberia and San Jose were almost the same distance, but there were several other options available to them. I’ve operated on both airports and several more in the region. Liberia is a lot easier than San Jose. I don’t have all the details of their exact problem and how they decided to handle it…….the investigation will tell in due time.
Wow. The pilot flying, did a complete 180, rather than run off the end of the runway and into what might have been residential housing. Give that man a medal.
There’s a high density highway 200meters at the end of the runway so in my opinion he took the right choice
No, the rudder was hard left, he was trying to keep it straight, but the #2 reverser out and the tires loss of friction (you often get rubber reversion when wheels are locked and the rubber reverts to liquid from friction heat and the tire effectively hydroplanes on the rubber) so the ground loop was not intentional. Nonetheless, getting it down and still driving until the very end is kudos to the crew.
They lived. Everything else is just stuff that can be replaced.
@@trunkmonkey9417 This mishap is the very definition of “any landing you can walk away from is a good landing”.
@@trunkmonkey9417 i saw the details you were referring to, you’re right, the manual reversion it’s a hell of a difficult maneuver, but they don’t simulate that type of phenomenon on the sim as it happens in the accident, you just use the pressure on the accumulator to brake the aircraft and that’s it
Women can fly planes too.
Great job by the crew. Thank God that the only things that got hurt were the plane and the cargo inside. You're witnessing professionalism in action.
Crashes cos mouloud and Mohamed was the controls
@Star Gazer this is not a Christian response so if you are, do some introspection hypocrite.
Are you seriously concerned about cargo?? You insensitive racist bigot. Have some empathy
@@trevor852 indonesia believe in Jesus Christ
@Star Gazer who worship him . We only worship the God as for hazrat Muhammad pbuh and also Jesus Christ pbuh they are messanger of the the God no true believer worship them but we do respect and love them.
Who never dreamed of drifting a 757 on arrival... for style ? Good job !
Fast and Furious XVII, Costa Rica Slide.
Tough break they yeeted into that darn ditch, otherwise, might have saved the bird.
They're okay, that's the main miracle.
Vin Diesel was the pilot.
@@donaldstanfield8862 another clapped out dhl 757 aint worth saving. sorry thing was ready to be put down and put of it's misery which is what happened
Having a hydraulic failure is like managing a 60t aluminum tube with engines, maneuverability and some crucial flight components are just stripped from you like a candy is taken from a child. This crew did a hella of job.
If it's a full hydraulic failure you lose ALL flight controls.
60ft? I must have missed the PC-12 in this video.
@@erichhartmann1 60 ton
Ufff
@@breed4312 Got to love it when someone edits their comment to fix the typo you pointed out and now you’re the one getting replied to…
Glad the flight crew is safe, that was wild.
Exactly!!!
Yes, they are. Only 2 persons in aircraft, captain and 1st official.
Thank God
Pilot: "Ever seen Tokyo Drift?"
@@wmedina14 well be glad they survived
Man that was a wild ride hydraulic failure is no joke it's like flying a brick with engines, good job guys and to the guy that took the video too!! 👍
This channel didnt take video he just copied it from internet
Second 757 I know of that ended up this way. Same thing, hyd failure after departure, brakeless brick on return, overrun, write off
@@outermarker5801 okay
@@outermarker5801 I think they had at least partial brakes judging from the tire smoke shortly before the runway excursion. It also suggests an antilock brake failure and differential braking leading to the “spin out”. The aircrew lived to fly another day. Well done guys.
@@richardbriscoe8563 Yeah, brakeless was tongue in cheek. Just meant hyd fail would contribute to the obvious braking issues in the clip.
Glad the crew's ok, but as an Avgeek it hurts to watch this airplane meet it's end.
If that 180 was to avoid overshooting the runway, absolutely top skills.
It wasn't. They had plenty of runway left. You can tell from the spoiler and rudder deflection, they where trying to keep it straight. They also only had right reverser operating due to the hydraulic failure, also nose wheel steering was inop. It was likely the asymmetric reverse that caused the aircraft to spin to the left.
@@fuckingdebutants That as may be, but it looked stylish and was practical in this case.
For all those wondering the Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA. It was not a Qantas flight though.
Thanks for the clarification. I was about to comment and ask how a Qantas plane ended up in Costa Rica.
@@evilk5271 Costa Rica * but yeah
@@fabianreusch4870 I stand corrected, I often get those two places mixed up.
@@evilk5271 no worries, one is literally named "rich Harbor" the other "rich coast"
It's an Alliance Airlines E190. They're providing ACMI services for Qantas.
Wow! First off the flight crew did a great job! I never knew a 757 could do a 180. I'm impressed by the fact that no one was hurt and everyone walked away!
The Fast and the Furious have nothing on DHL pilots. They may drift in pansy cars, but try it in a 757.
🤣🤣🤣🤣
Looked like a ground loop to me!
@@donnafromnyc It was certainly a ground loop though, unlike usual, I believe it was an intentional act by the pilot(s) in this scenario.
Poor 757. That's another one down.
@@nathd1748 literally nothing of value was lost
Wow! Good job on the video too!
You're not on the flight deck right now, right?
What's up Juan?
Patiently waiting for your thoughts on this Juan. Thanks for all your hard work!
Hi sir.
Come on Juan waiting on you to report!
Thanks for posting this.
Glad the flight crew evac went safely, and in view of what happened to the rear fuselage glad that it was a cargo flight as that did not look good had there been rear seat passengers.
You're right there, it would have been very bad for any passengers in the rear of the plane if it was a passenger plane.
When did this happen
@@aviationix today
While this is the best case scenario I doubt there would've been very serious injuries had it been a passenger plane as it looked like quite a low speed crash and there have been cases in the past where the plane broke up into pieces but everyone managed to evacuate such as AF flight 358. Either way props to the crew.
And yet they said the rear of the plane was the safest.
Incredible that they survived and managed to get it down safely. Terrific filming.
Uh, not really. They got on the ground without any problem & they were able to bleed off enough ground speed to where when they finally did crash, it wasn't life threatening (to the pilots) & don't forget this is a Cargo Flight. At most there's probably 4 people. Depending on the 757/767 accommodations for relief crew, a DHL employee dead-heading somewhere, etc... More than likely just the 2 pilots were on board and it was clear by 0.54 that they were gonna walk away from this...the Aircraft wasn't going to make it, but that's another story
@@kettle_of_chris Exactly my point. Thanks for extrapolating it for me.
@@NathanElcoate I'm sorry I was just reacting to the part of the sentence about them 'surviving'. I should have clarified that.
film?
Only .0001% of pilots have successfully pulled off a 180 degree runway exit in a commercial jet. Pura Vida!
Most flip n fire ball sadly, if the dip had not been there it may have stayed on its feet too. Outstanding flight skills 👏 👌 👍
Elaborate please sir
He can’t elaborate because he has no idea wtf he’s talking about.
The pilots did a great job. So did the person shooting the video. Thanks for posting.
its a great job to film something? nah xD
So glad that nose stayed up and there were no injuries or post fire.. It seemed like they couldn't stop, the crew did a great job in maintaining great control. Cheers
I agree. It looks like the brakes locked up from images of the skid marks at the end of the runway and it drifted. Sort of like what a car does when you pull the ebrake at speed
like making a U turn and broke apart. What a good job of the flight crew.
The aircraft stayed in control…not the drivers!
I think thrust reversers were lost with hydraulic loss. So only wheel brakes.
@@hp2084 and probably spoilers and minimal flaps
Happy the competent crew was safe ! Job well done by the emergency services.
This film footage will really help accident investigators.
And the will learn some colloquial cuss words from the videographer 😳
@@tivivesrj 🤣🤣
@@tivivesrj 😂😂😂
@@tivivesrj Indeed! Top notch Costa Rican slang! 😂
How?!?!
Pilot: “I tell you, you can’t handbrake turn an aircraft”
First Officer: “Buckle up and watch this”
lol good one
The pilot owns BMW M3 and a Supra
You can't handbrake turn...
Hold my beer.
This is When a pilot is Incredible...
This is what they're trained for...
Glad Everyone is safe
Cargo plane
Good job by the crew I say looks like everyone went home today could have been so different if the bird didn't get on the ground
DHL is a cargo company. There are no passengers 🤦♂️
So, you don't count the humans who crew the plane don't?
Glad the crew wasn't hurt. It looked like the main landing gear collapsed making that hard right u turn.
@@YYZ_Aviation2 I do know this i work for dhl express myself as a driver
the plane had flight crew on who to my knowledge got off safely which is the only scenario dhl and all its staff will care truly about everything is insured and replaceable family members are not and we are always told by dhl to get the people home over anything else
@@steveroche2524 Hey, you guys all do an amazing job, especially these last two years.
Well done, and much thanks for loyal service!
And that my friends is how you do a 'Handbrake' turn! Total respect to the pilots for landing what can possibly have been a flying brick. Glad no one was hurt!
Lost hydraulics? jeez the fact they were able to land safely it's incredible by it self, hope they are ok and we can see an interview of the pilots in a near future!
Hydraulic failure
Yes my friend
can’t be a severe hydraulic faulure since Flaps, slats, spoilers and right reverser were all deployed and most brakes seemed to work, but anti skid seems to have failed.
That must have been a rough spin there! I bet that shook them up a lot!
I can't imagine the sounds they heard, yikes!
Definitely had some hydraulics, no reverser’s deployed on the engines though
This video pops up when I'm on the airport flying twice today and it brings me chills.
The engine reving as it slides into the ditch!!! God that is scary. Kudos to the crew. Professionals.
It's amazing there was no fire, they're so lucky to have stopped safely. I bet they kissed the ground when they got down that ladder!
Well done of the pilots that was like the most great emergency landed i ever seen a perfect 10/10
That was a stunning maneuver!
Maybe the ditch actually helped arrest the motion of the aircraft!?
You can see the tires skidding meaning he has some hydraulics but thrust reversers on both engines are not deployed. Flaps can go down on electric motors. Some of the spoiler boards are not up on the left wing and 1 only on the right wing.
They did a fantastic job, glad they are okay, and are able to tell the story.
Glad to hear the flight crew is alive to fly another day; a remarkable landing! Add to their resumes drifting abilities in a 757.
Ay Mae!!! por dicha no pasó a mayores. Excelente toma bro. 😮
Olvidaron poner el beep de ls censura. Se escucharon malas palabras
@@lillymoreira5278 si jaja
Thanks for posting. I wonder why QANTAS had an aircraft on the ground at Costa Rica (see start of the video). I am glad the crew members made it out ok.
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
The QANTAS tail is an Embraer E-Jet E190 on a delivery flight from SBGP to Australia. Often uses MROC/SJO as a fuel stop enroute to SDM or BRO to OAK to HNL to Nandi or Majuro Atoll to Australia.
From other videos it looked like the aircraft slid into what might be a drainage area, i.e. an area much lower than the runway and taxiways, causing the fuselage to break but leaving the wings and engines mostly intact. Seeing how much the wheels and/or brakes were smoking I wouldn't be surprised if the right mains went flat.
they lost hydraulics.
@@brojoe1617 I see that they made a downwind landing too... which wouldn't have helped them stop!
The plane broke in half, the back of the plane.
I think they must have had hydraulic brake control only, and like you said they lost the tires from the heat causing the hard turn
ASN report says the aircraft left taxiway K and entered a depression causing the structural failure
RIP dear 757
Thank you for riding with DHL
And who got there peter tangle on to record it?
Excellent video job! I must also give it up for the pilots; they did such an excellent job. They handled that plane like a car. Good job! 👏
If you look closely you can see that only right wing reverser is active and pilots apply full rudder to counter. Seems this was one of the reasons for the spin at the end - the spin probably even saved the pilots. In gliders you teach pilots to lay down one wing one landing when close to something to cartwheel on purpose and not crash into the object.
Good observation. Looks like right engine was reversing while the left was making significant forward thrust.
Good observation. Aside from runway length concerns, why even bother applying the thrust reversers? Or did they not expect this to happen? I guess we’ll find out in the accident report.
Right, I wonder if that combination, and the ditch, actually helped arrest the motion of the aircraft!?
Time will reveal all. Thank God they are safe to tell the tale! That was quite a spin!!
@@tjweber You're gonna do everything you can to get stopped and reversers are an aid to that. I have no Boeing time but on the Airbus I fly a hydraulic failure can affect braking performance significantly (depending on which system fails) so I'd hazard to say it was a judgement call on the part of the crew.
They lost the left hydraulic system, which disabled the left thrust reverser, as well as the nosewheel steering. So with only the righthand reverser to help slow down, it’s going to want to pull the airplane to the right. Without steering, they tried to compensate with differential braking and they had control through most of the landing roll until the very end, when it looks like they could no longer maintain enough differential to keep the airplane on the runway.
Glad to see it was not more tragic than this incident on the ground. Hope the crew are okey and well. RIP B757.
Thank you for Kona keeping the camera straight. I’ll give you a A-
Lose hydraulics you lose the use of thrust reversers. Notice they are not deployed... Then the antiskid system says that enough and locks up the one main gear and that is when the plane starts to drift sideways...
looks like they couldn't throttle back or cut the engines. Wheels are locked but plane slides off runway with the engines screaming even after it collapses on the ground
Depend on which system you lose. The B737 consist of 3 systems, A, B and Stby, and either system can power all the flight controls of the other. I guess the 757, which is newer, are built more like the same, most aircrafts is, and maybe even with a 3 system, beside stby.
B757 has three. Left, Center and Right. The right system powered by the EDP and an ACMP powers brakes and the Antiskid and also its respective reverser. Left system powered alternate brakes and its respective reverser also.
Right reverser works.
Then it was something to do with left system which is also NWS and Alternate brakes...
Coming back from the Middle East for discharge years ago, our C-141 lost primary hydraulics. Made a very hard landing in Saudi Arabia. We were prepared. Maintenance crew fixed it, continued to Madrid Spain, where it was redlined, and a replacement flown in the next day.
Great job by the crew and glad no injuries- stuff can be replaced lives can't
You shoot the video as if you already knew that there will be an accident! Great Video!
I never knew Qantas flew there!
I was about to make the same remark!
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
That’s great airmanship right there! Well-trained and professional crew.
What an excellent job by the crew and air traffic control.
The most HD crash video i have ever seen!
My respect to the pilots…..Job well done …
Thank you for panning away when the action happens, and out of focus too! Damn, you would be the perfect ancient aliens camera guy!
Great save by the pilot with no hydraulics, millions lost but lives saved! 🙏🏻
Why even mention money? Only you "tim".
That one 757 DHL plane: I might have drifted a lil too far but at least i held a record🗿
10/10 handbrake turn in a plane
I can’t wait to see the investigation report !! Glad they are safe 👍🏽👍🏽👍🏽
What's the Qantas plane doing on the runway in Costa Rica????
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
Both I and my mother worked at DHL. She was in Norwalk CT and I was in Port Chester, NY.
Now that’s how you Drift, baby!
Pilot got a whole in one.
Many thanks for upload! Great the pilots are save.
WOWW!!! God blessed that flight crew!!!
Why did God break the hydraulics in the first place?
@@mooghead only god knows. What i can tell u is that everything happens for a reason
@@mooghead Seriously?
@@joeybonin7691 yes
@@threeptlqyup The only thing you can't do is prove your statement. The DHL flight crew did an amazing job through training and professionalism - at least there is evidence for the training.
Great catch. Right place at the right time. Thanks for posting.
They knew this emergency landing plane was coming in so that is why vidieos were rolling.Fire trucks ready with lights on too. Glad all ok
Kudos to the Flight crew kiss the plane good bye and there were able to walk away unscathed !
Thank God, no fire ... 🙏👍
And great job by the crew!
Is that a Qantas aircraft on the tarmac? Never knew they flew there... Thankfully no deaths, which is great.... always am amazed how pilots come with emergencies..
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
that 180 must have been a wild sensation from the cockpit, whoawee!
Many packages perished but thankfully no people, it would have been a very different story had it been a passenger plane.
Especially if the passengers had been American!
I think it's safe to say the pilot's underwear were neither dry nor empty. Glad they survived! - Former DHL delivery driver and flight ground crew member.
The wigglin' pin came loose from the #6 bell crank wobblin' rod. The pooch is screwed at that point. Glad they made it okay.
As an aviation mechanic, I can say there are several redundancies built into these aircrafts. And while I have never worked what looks like a 757, I do know they have a solid reputation.
Edit: I just reread the title... Well at the least I can officially confirm it is a 757.
Wow. A crash video with commendable focus, attentive tracking, and no shaking.
Any landing you walk away from is a good landing. 👍
Why do i feel like pilots should have done 180 degree turn to the left side of plane if this was purely because of his skill? And isn't this like some wheel friction melting itself or hydraulic problems which cause this accident or something? Why is whole of comments praising their skill? Well i am not disrespecting pilots or crew. I respect them a lot too and I'm glad everyone is safe too. But these comments felt odd to me.
Parecía que todo iva a salir bien hasta el último momento. Lo bueno que los pilots salieron bien.
Hello, old friend is here, continued success for the channel, I'm from Jakarta, Indonesia...
I just want to tell you folks good luck. We're counting on you.
Oh my...glad the crew is ok...thanks for posting
Having no reverse thrust didn't help things either but good job by the pilots 👍🏿
Incredible footage!!
No reverse thrusters! He must have been standing on the brakes As hard as humanly possible. Great job.
They said the right one was working, that may be why they yeeted into the ditch!? Plus, the brakes were locking, sad set of circumstances, glad the pilots are okay.
They can find another aircraft!
@@donaldstanfield8862 The video shows that the right reverser was deployed.
DHL: Tokyo drift.
Someone translate what the camera person is saying, please.
GASP!! "Oh holy mother dude.... OH DUDE!!!... [BLEEP] DUDE.... holy God dude.... oh dude".... [in background] "-indecipherable- you see?! -indecipherable-" *video ends*
@@morganbedoya4684 Thank you. Appreciate it. Gracias.
@@morganbedoya4684 "Indecipherable" is a very polite way of saying "a choice bit of Costa Rican slang"😂
We lost all hydraulics on a flight out of Denver. Airbus 320. Flight crew became terrified. Plane had no surface controls and plane could only turn by engine power. The pilots were porpoising the plane up and down using power and dropping the nose by cutting back power to lose altitude. Used the engines to turn us around and fly back to Denver so the plane would slide sideways vs. banking and making big circular turns. They got the landing gear down but had no hydraulic brakes. Just manual power to try to slow it down. We hit the runway going superfast! I thought for sure we weren't going to stop. The engines couldn't use reverse thrusters to help. Luckily the runway was massively long and the plane was able to finally slow down a couple miles along it. They had to tow us back to the gate and the flight crew and pilots got the hell out of the plane first as fast as they could as other crews got us unboarded. We had to wait a long time to get another flight home because that crew was too shaken up to fly again that night. I was calm the whole time but it must have been scarier for them than we realized or there was something more wrong than they wanted to tell us.
Never happened
@@Derek-b8q You're right. I totally made it all up.
Wonder why the qantas was there
The Qantas plane is an E190 aircraft, it appears to be a retired plane that hasn’t been repainted, its reg is N951UW and it had just landed from roswell USA.
With no hydraulics, it's amazing they could do a 180 like that. Nice camera work. Most people shake their cameras to utter oblivion just filming a fully stationary lawn chair. (stationary!...not one being hurled around by a category 5 tornadocane)
Nice handbrake turn from the pilot, and fair play to him or her aswell, cosmetic damage, loss of licence, but planes integrity should be OK, all I know is well done
Who said they lost their license? Lol wtf
@@SimboSays I wasn't talking to you in the first place, I was replying to yew know
"Tower, we're coming in hot!!!"
He had power on but thrust reversers weren’t deployed…
Before landing, it was already an emergency aircraft from a hydraulic failure. I think the thrust reverser wasn't available on one engine.
What happened? Lost hydraulics during flight so they knew the landing wasn't going to be nice. Everyone was aware of it and waiting. Great landing given the circumstances. The 2 Crew members are save.
Reversers are hydraulic actuated on Pratt and Whitney and Rolls Royce engines
A lot of praise for the crew! Awesome job!
Glad they're ok
that pilot definitely did some handbrake turns when he was a teen!! epic driving/piloting under pressure!!
Pilots Are You Okay
They almost made it. If they had only skidded a little sooner... "Any landing you can walk away from is a good landing." -- Anonymous flight instructor.
Gerald R Massie gets credit for that one. 👍
And if you can use the plane again, even better!!
Wow! Thanks for sharing this!
Actually, assuming the pilots didn't cause the problem in the first place, they did an excellent job.
You could also classify this as a good landing.
And a total loss for the airline you might add.
@@stefantreff4706 Yeah, there is a saying among pilots that goes something like this:
A good landing is any landing you can walk away from.
If you can fly the airplane the next day it is an excellent landing.
Nice Drift at the End! Excellent Pilot! His 180° spin saved all their lives. If it had kept going straight, outcome would of been devastating.
You can see that the gear doors are down before the plane spins out. So that shows the hydraulics were being wierd. nice job pilots!
Anytime everyone walks away, it is not considered a crash. Nice drifting!
*UY MAE CAREPICHA MAE*
A lot of opinions here. A 757 has 3 hydraulic systems. Lose one….usually not a big issue, but two can become more precarious. 1 system is enough to fly the plane (although sluggish). Slats/flaps were out, but I guess not fully extended and that increases the landing speed and thus the required stopping distance. A high altitude airport increases your landing speed even further! Why they chose to return to ‘high altitude’ San Jose and not, for example, to ‘sealevel’ Liberia (20 min away from San Jose) is a mystery to me and there are a lot of other questions that need to be answered. It looks like they went off around Kilo intersection and then there is still a few hundred meters of runway left. Left reverser is not deployed (which probably indicates a left hydraulic failure), but I think I hear the right reverser at full reverse. Was full reverse on one engine maintained too long so they lost directional control? Maybe. Wheels are smoking: a way too heavy landing weight sounds unlikely as they had only a short flight ahead of them. Antiskid u/s? Very very rare. There is a Power Transfer Unit between the R and L hydraulic system so slats/flaps, landing gear system and nosewheel steering still work. So then why did they go off? The investigation will tell in time what happened. Then we’ll see where the learning moments are. For now I’m glad everyone is ok.
Not a 757 guy but knowing aircraft certification requirements was discounting the “no hydraulics” verbiage. Bigger aircraft require more hydraulics and more sophistication which can lead to issues when things go south.
I've been flying jets for 20 years and no way I'd be flying an extra 20 minutes to Liberia with compromised hydraulics. I can't speak to Boeing performance but the landing distance assessment charts for the plane I fly show about a 500' increase in required landing distance for the roughly 3000' difference in elevation between Liberia and San Jose which is more than made up for by the additional 800' of runway available at San Jose. It's a wash.
Frank, I’ve got 35+ years under my belt with 22000+ hours. Mostly 747,767,777 and 787. A single hydraulic failure is not a big deal if you choose your options right. A single empty hydraulic system is not a time critical emergency. It is not getting any worse with time. However, returning to a high level airport with reduced landing flaps and tailwind can be ok but is less than ideal. When they decided to turn back Liberia and San Jose were almost the same distance, but there were several other options available to them. I’ve operated on both airports and several more in the region. Liberia is a lot easier than San Jose. I don’t have all the details of their exact problem and how they decided to handle it…….the investigation will tell in due time.
Left thrust reverser was not deployed while it looks like right reverser was properly deployed. It may explain why it drifted from Left to right.
good observation. perhaps the locked up tires on the main gear exaggerated the drift
Kudos to the crew, professionalism at it’s best. Sorry for the 75 loss.
Who else saw that dudes tiktok from the airport?
Lucaas:
This DHL Boeing 757-200 Cargo had a hydraulic failure so it's broke down during hard landing
but luckily no one was injured.
Thankful that they are all safe and great job on having the emergency vehicles there quickly.
Thanks bro for sharing. Whereabout the incident?which airport in Costa Rica?