The Tactical Bigotry of Containment
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- Collected Works: www.amazon.co....
All my vital links: unpopular.acad...
Purchase the complete Trivium here: www.academic-a...
Foundations of Rhetoric: www.academic-a...
Foundations of Logic: www.academic-a...
Foundations of Writing here: www.academic-a...
Foundations of Economics: www.academic-a...
Channel membership: / @academicagent
MERCH: teespring.com/...
Subscribestar: www.subscribes...
Paypal: www.paypal.com...
Donate: fundly.com/hel...
Entropy: entropystream....
“Six men who live on a diet of almost pure cope” 😆
Join For Britain
“Abdul Al-Kareem is going to love it when he finally gets to go to Greggs”
One of my co-workers is a Tory Boy. He's such an establishment stooge and so easy to wind up haha. He gasped in horror when I told him I didn't trust the BBC or any establishment news source and then tried to lecture me as to why I should. When I'm bored I just tease him.... He even likes star trek discovery! That should be enough to tell you what kind of sub beta male he is.
"But Ryan, supporting BRITISH news establishment is what a real nationalist would do!!"
@KnownNiche Nobody should be blindly following orders or leaders or "experts"; the 20th century should have taught everyone that.
@@sookmahroot I know. I am ridiculing your co-worker
You just know the Evola/Carlyle reading has taken AA into new perspectives on the modern world and ratcheting up the content . Much is beyond me but after 2 or 3 listens it goes in
"The past is like a foreign country; they do things differently there." - L.P. Hartley
And because we are reactionaries battling modernity we can be seen as foreigners, just not in the way these Tory Boys are thinking.
Triggernometry and Spiked are pure containment.
How about the Spectator?
@@Confucius_76Same, Netanyahu-loving Douglas Murray regularly writes for them ffs
@@martinledermann1862 what's wrong with supporting Israel? Have you seen the sort of people who support Palestine?
@@Confucius_76 Ah, but he'd have to have balance between the two, and he doesn't; he's on one side completely.
@@dashingeduardosuarez yes he is a bit of a pro Israel attack dog, but honestly Israel is way better than third world socialist, Islamist Palestine.
I can feel the passion and emotion in your voice, AA. You’ve gotten much better at speaking to underneath our minds. The messaging is clear.
LOL. Do you know how sinister that is? I hope, 'underneath our minds' was a slip of the keyboard.
@@edwardburroughs1489 That's not a slip. We all know about propaganda and its uses.
@@herewardthewake5433 Errr. Thats not a good thing, is it?
@@edwardburroughs1489 Being aware of propaganda is a bad thing?
@@herewardthewake5433 That's what I'm saying, however it seems from your initial reply that you're in favour of being propagandized or spoken to 'underneath our minds'?
Keep in mind: whenever these people say “our values,” what they really mean to say is “MY values.”
I think "our values" is essentially antiwhite morality.
The illusion of universalism. We must include everything previously discounted from the whole (nation, religion, whatever) because otherwise you are a particularist hypocrite rather than the universalists you claim to be. However, if you happen to disagree, you are of course excluded - never mind the logic of excluding someone being evidence of their own particularism, it's done on the grounds of the excluded being a greater particularist, therefore bad. This logical trap is so potent, it needs a clear and concise rebuttal, otherwise it's going to keep working.
My point is that they are effectively gaslighting.“Our values” is an appeal to patriotism. They want everyone to think that their ideas are uniquely American, or British, or Canadian, etc. Where as in reality, these people are the opposite of patriots and their ideas and values are often times that of the foreigner.
@@Jilktube you are correct.
What needs to be realized is that anyone that inflicts harm upon Westernkind and Western Civilization is by definition antiwhite.
My or, our values is meaningless. What is a British value, how does it differ from a Welsh or Scottish value, or an American one etc. It's meaningless.
When the right speak the truth the left label it as ranting
Who cares what they think ?
@@ottosump3356 You care, they are your people, of course you care about them. Your nation isn't the right, your nation is England.
The Iran-bashing does seem to lack a bit of historic perspective.
It was a western-friendly society and even today the country is full of universities. It is nothing like Saudi Arabia.
Gaza isn't only a refugee/concentration camp and high-tech prison - but also an exiting green Smart City
The concept is also meant for the rest of the world
Us folks up here in Norway also get to hear that we have no rights to our land, and in reality don’t exist as a people
This vid is excellent AA, like a bucket of cold water in the face to snap ppl into reality. Cheers.
The Danes were Alfred's future subjects.
They converted to Christianity and were ethnic cousins.
There is almost no difference between an Anglo-Saxon and a Dane, save that the former decided to abandon their ancestral religions a couple of hundred years earlier and the latter were part of a military campaign to stop it happening to them.
The English and Danes had genetic similarities. These do not
They were though
The difference between standing FOR principles and hiding BEHIND principles...
The irony is that they speak Persian in Afghanistan.
Only some parts. It's like a 50/50 split.
@@rainyvideos3684 It's the lingua franca. The Pashtuns are the biggest group but the other groups do not speak their language.
@@natapple9142 i mean, aryan is the origin of the name Iran
Or so im told
To my shame, through most of my adult life I posed the question to anyone who would listen; Why is there no serious living right-wing intelligentsia? It seemed that anyone with intellect always found themselves on the left. Conclusion? To be intelligent was to be left-wing. I didn't look hard enough and it wasn't until the advent of the internet that I realised there are credible right-wing thinkers. I think my own shortcoming on this is widespread in the west. The Overton window effect that AA concludes with here has been very effective indeed. As he points out this narrowing of options continues to be an important part of the left's (i.e. the establishment's) armory. However I can only see this wall crumbling as access to other ways of looking at our malaise come to light
It works the other way chronologically, however. The more books by intelligent, deceased writers I read, the more I see that practically none of them would be on the 'left' were they brought back to life today.
@@Pinkdam Agreed. Even Marx would have a serious rethink if given the advantage of being able to view the history of the 20th century
It's a minor point, but I think it's fair to say that Mark Collett doesn't spend his time ranting at immigrants in the way Tommy Robinson or Britain First do. He's been making the same criticism of counter-jihad as AA is here for years.
Mark seems okay, but I hadn't noticed that. Got any examples?
@@MrSonicAdvance Not to hand. I've often heard him make many of the points AA is making on his weekly livestream though.
@@MrSonicAdvance Mark Collects email address with a passion. And then there's the pa vetting.
@@grottythumber6226 What is significant about the PA vetting? Are you implying it's particularly strict? If so, in what ideological direction?
Tommy Robinson only rants about Islam and not really even immigrants.
Tory boy seems to forget good old Mosley
I love all the recent anti-elf rhetoric
Honestly, how long before we just ask for an Early Life check on the Tory Boys?
Don't forget physiognomy!
Bloody Normans the lot of them
The first guy was following the Foreign Office "Four Stage Strategy" from Yes Prime Minister point for point.
Great expose of the utter hypocrisy of those absolute stains
England should remain English. Native English. Other than that, I agree with just about everything that you’ve said.
Can the discussion about mass immigration not be had at all? Is it not fair to say that the mass movement of people into a region or a nation is both unsettling to the natives and disruptive to their culture? Is a culture not just how well settled and stable a group of people have become, and should that stability be unsettled for purely economic reasons without first measuring the cost of its loss?
Also it's simply a crime against the native/indigenous people
No. It is blasphemy against the new (or perhaps old) ideal of universalism. It's Alinsky's 'make them live by their stated principles' in action. If you talk about it, notice it, complain about it - you are a particularist excluding people who are merely part of the brotherhood of man (etc etc). They're just like you. They love queues, they drink tea, watch the football, and love the NHS. To draw any sort of barrier against this is particularism, which breaks any aspirations Christian Europe had to its universalism. This is why the discussion cannot be had. The fact that no-one really cares about Christianity in the British elite anymore, let alone trying to convert newcomers, is neither here nor there. It's a perfect demonstration of power, of utilising a former strong point to become a weak point.
@@warmasterhorus This doesn't actually matter unless it 1. Creates jobs and money for the people advocating for such people i.e. human rights lawyers, NGOs etc, and 2. It aligns with the elite's wants and needs. Unless and until this can be used to actually make the elite stand by their stated aims, as per Christian universalism, it's a pointless argument to make. It has to work in reality by displaying the hypocrisy and having advocates willing to go on the defensive.
For Britain will halt all immigration for 5 years (at least), and repatriate all illegals.
@Futurus Europae Thank you I will.
AA's fundamental flaw is that he maintains his atheism without understanding the strategic implications of christian nationalism.
I see its value as well, but his atheism may be as in my case personal- it would be fundamentally dishonest to trumpet it, however strategic, when you cannot truly embrace the faith yourself.
Whether atheism is considered a flaw or not is heavily dependent on the context. I can think of several scenarios in which being an atheist is an advantage. I'm an Orthodox, by the way, so when it comes to my country the Christianity is a crucial marker of our ethnic identity by default since 863. Thus the Orthodoxy has had evolved into a natural aspect of our particular brand of nationalism.
His main flaw is he never actually elucidates his own position, falling back on claims of doing ,'value free analysis' and other such get outs. Christianity is just another false, ancient middle eastern religion, in that respect it is just like Islam.
@@edwardburroughs1489 Islam is 'just like' nothing else. It asserts temporal authority over all the world, and the process by which this will be brought about is called Jihad.
@@FiveLiver Christianity makes the very same claims, it most definitely claims 'temporal authority over all the world', as you put it. The relative merits of either religions subscribers is another matter. It suffices to say once more that both are based on the false claims of ancient middle eastern tribesmen. On that basis alone they are identical.
Nothing wrong or odd about pointing out Islam's murderous problem with women and gays. There's a big difference between not wanting these people harmed and wanting them forced into every position and conversation.
I think PJW has moved more to lean-reactionary in his social views, he definitely doesn’t always flank criticism of Islam from the left as much as he once did. I’ve noticed that the cathedral tries to lump in people like Collet with the counter-jihad group.
What's wrong with counter jihad?
@@owenthompson5214 There is nothing special about Islam. The Europeans need to fight all invaders.
You should interview Mark Collett, Academic Agent. He isn't afraid to talk about the issues you bring up here.
Interview Mark Collett? He'll be speaking at the next PA conference at this rate.
A complex and nuanced rebuttal to the current cultural landscape. I’ll best listen one more time.
In defence of Katie Hopkins I have never once heard her describe people of Pakistani heritage as British. For example she always describes Sadiq Khan as the Pakistani mayor.
There's a word for it all: TINA = There Is No Alternative
After 4 years of waiting you’ve finally given us a true honest take, bravo 👏
Looks like 'takes' aren't his strong suit.
@@annemarieforprimeminister8020 hahaha you guys are hilarious, jog on mate I hear Tommy calling ya 😘
Okay, I have to get this off my chest now: David Baddiel in "Football's Coming Home" is what I always used to imagine how AA looks like.
That's pretty close...
Just google for a picture of the Ayatollah.
Ouch!
He looks a lot more Welsh.
@@mrenovatio3739 You need to meet more Welsh people
You know, when the phrase "counter-jihad" was brought up I thought it was going to be the jihad from Jihad vs McWorld.
Regarding Douglas Murray gesturing towards the fact that Europe feels tired and not going into why.... I'd very much like to know more about this. Would anyone be so kind as to point me in the right direction? I'd greatly appreciate it
Very effective analysis of why antiestablismentarianism can't get going.
Half Iranian? No wonder you are so BASED. God speed to you Academic agent.
There is nothing British about Iranians but there sure is something British about muslims!
It’s similar to here in Australia where they on one hand can attack Christianity and say it was never Australian but then promote multicultural Islam as an Aussie value on par with Vegemite on toast.
Brings a tear to my eye when a fellow Brit brings up 'Three Lions'. So proud of the lads. Remember Psycho screaming? England banging 4 past the Dutch? Tezza Venabezza consoling Our Gareth after his penalty? Heroes, the lot of them. Reminded me of what it must've been like going over the top in Flanders Fields. RIP. You served us all and made the greatest sacrifice. Long Live Our Her Majesty etc.
You're comparing footballers to men fighting in a world war? GTFO. Pro sportsball players are not heroes, they're a distraction.
@@RealIllumin He's being sarcastic. I hope.
@@philipbailey9670 Hope that IS the case.
@@RealIllumin OMG!
You're telling me that 2 World Wars and 1 World Cup Doo Dah Doo Dah doesn't make you weep the tears of the blood of all the Patron Saints of these green and pleasant lands?
Pfffft.
@@TruckerJenkins82 Not all football fans are scum but all scum are football fans.
Cant wait for Carlyle day
AA, do you not think that Charles Murray’s work explains the overrepresentation of Jewish people in certain professions? Do you think there is any truth to this and if so how much do you think this contribute vs in-group preference?
I don't think flanking Is lam to the left is necessarily containment, it fits into Alinsky's Rules For Radicals - making your opponent live up to their own values. It also creates Overton space to discuss the negative impacts of im migration.
Islam is the Achilles heel of the left: they are on its team but it is impossible to defend. That's why they are so keen on shutting up Tommy Robinson.
Are your co mints being G-hosted too? Lol.
and it creates division in the leftist-islamist alliance
Better to live on with endless shame than to not but with honour;
if you start kicking the ball into your own goal then in a way you are on the winning side,
the other team will treat you as one of their own and not as a gutless Quisling.
Unfinished Victory: a must-read.
Its so incredible the parallels between america and britain
As a Citizen of the ROI and an outsider, well not a UK subject, AA sounds quintessentially British. I mean that as a compliment, not insult..
So does Kwasi Kwarteng and the rest of the foreigners in the cabinet.
"These Afghans will eventually be his subjects"
No Mr Gammon all Afghans will.
Only if he's prepared to fight to make it so. I'd say there's more chance of London gaining country status from the UN and William turning up at the flag removal ceremony.
Churchill wasn't a 'Bulldog Nationalist'
He was an old imperialist. Not the same thing, at all. I believe there was once a minor scuffle between those ideas, what was it called? Oh aye, The Great War.
AA I haven’t heard “ugly and violent rhetoric” from TR or Patriotic Alternative or For Britain etc. they actually tend to be quite restrained. Maybe I’ve missed it but I’ve watched a lot of their content.
True.
Even intelligent people can be blind to the fact that they have a dog in the fight. This man clearly does. Hopkins, TR and the like, if anything, have been far too polite for their own collective goods.
"You can't generalize them! They're so good at shallow assimilation!"
Brilliant, as always. I especially like the element of wry humour along with the clear bold analysis.
Just rewatched this. It's one of my favourites for pure entertainment value. The Tory Boy bashing is good sport, and it's hilarious.
King Edward II seemed to disagree with certain ideas being un-british.
Lots of things are British which we are not generally aware of. The Guardian published a reassuring article showing that acid attacks are totally a native thing that has come back into fashion for some reason.
I love AA singing...
How can you be so intelligent and yet still miss the elephant in the room: that by whomever, or for whatever reason, the English are being intentionally driven from their homeland, jus as the Palestinians are being driven from theirs? I don’t believe that you aren’t aware of this because the ones behind it all seem quite open about it, if not downright proud to be the facilitators of this phenomenon.
And if Katie Hopkins is a “screaming bigot”, then what does that make you, for insulting a woman who doesn’t want to be phased out of existence in her own home?
your dis on rocksteady and bebop is unwelcome
Brilliant AA thank you
Wonderfull video on gatekeeping!
Have you spoken to Mark Collett ? What is your impression of him ? Ta
He is Mark Collett's puppet master. It was previously Right Reaction, but the Cathedral decided to move in a different direction with their subversion of the opposition.
8:25 This may be a flaw in the argument in the logical sense, but it's a fundamentally realist, British, and class-based way of operating. They quite rightly recognise your argument as one more akin to German philosophy, with some desert zeal, rather than anything specifically 'British'. Which may as well be code for strategic compromise.
It is, ostensibly, High Toryism in its contemporary form, shaped by the realities of Blair changing the political parameters of left/right in the 90s i.e. it recognises the importance of the middle ground. The overaseas newcomer is almost always the absolute fringe unit in any modern society, and thus they are used as a distant subsidary by established groups of the managerial and ancestral elites of Britain. This is due to the newcomers' typical lack of ability and access to advocacy - they usually have to take what they are given, which is often not a lot. Supporting the notion of them becoming subjects is merely a cover for avoiding the tactically foolish option of telling the whole truth about what they think about the matter. This is done in the knowledge and comfort of (usually) inherited and long-established wealth and status within Britain, which ensures the highly classified society of the UK effectively filters out and mitigates the damage caused by any overseas newcomers from directly impacting them and their families. In other words, the Tories' children will still grow up in exurbia or wealthy districts of London, they will still go to top universities, they will still go to selective or fee paying schools, they will still have private healthcare. They simply will not interact with, let alone compete with, the overaseas newcomer. The overseas newcomer is as distant and, in a very real sense, as irrelevant to them as the steelworker in Sunderland or the fisherman in Cornwall. This part is key, because they are middle (often middle-middle or upper-middle) class and have none of the elite or patriarchal tendencies of the aristocracy, thus they feel no affinity to the steelworker or fisherman. They see them as subjects to be used or dismissed for their own means and any newcomer is viewed in the same light.
Simply, the overaseas newcomer is too far below the Tory Boy for them to worry about. It's very much Keep the Aspidistra Flying. The highly nuanced social hierarchy that exists in Britain ensures that any attempt to climb the order by newcomers will successfully weed out a huge proportion of the newcomers for obvious reasons. So, in 30 years' time, the only people the children of the T Boys have to interact with are the doctors, lawyers, dentists etc. i.e. the ones who have effectively transcended their origins and joined the comfortable middle order, without having the established position to challenge the upper middle classes. The so called 'brightest and best'. It is quite simply a matter of strategy: their honest response to this is 'who cares?' because the intelligent and connected ones are confident in their ability to endure the long game. The more established and connected one is, the better, as that grants a number of benefits from a communal model to follow on certain lifestyle decisions, to being able to withstand parallel middle class communities that may wish to whittle down their number (i.e. anything centre-left). The newcomer is irrelevant, even the numbers arriving are irrelevant. Look at certain communities in mill towns or inner London, three or four generations on and many of them have done nothing of note but merely stayed and changed where they first arrived (which are always working class areas). The T Boy knows that most newcomers will simply stay like this for generations to come, which is not a concern to them as long as they remain unaffectedy by the changes that occur from bringing newcomers in (which is where this strategy fails in the long term for a majority of the T Boys).
It may be ridiculous as an argument, because it quite clearly sits back and does nothing about what everyone else understands to be the consequences of mass newcomers. But that's because their world is small. It is the world of the village green, the rotary club, the parish, and perhaps more recently the newbuild in exurbia, the holiday home in the west of the country, property prices, the job(s) in the city, summer in tuscany and winter in val d'isere, and school fees for the kids. These people would never and could never create a country, nor even maintain it: they cannot advocate for a people as they are not really of or from any particular place. They are not the class 2 foxes. They are the middle, and they recognise how the channel creator is also of the middle but opting for the Cromwellian and puritanical approach instead of the more contemporary British one - the former was most recently tried on the continent in the middle of the last century. Which they think is needlessly risky if not outright self destructive, as that is simply going to hamper their aforementioned concerns. So, they may be 'wrong', but their strategy is one of practical survival. It works for them because it really does work for their families. Whether or not those on twitter understand this, or are simply imitating talking points, is largely irrelevant. This is how Toryism still works behind the Cameronite developments to the brand.
@@Mr___X what you're describing here is the story of the loser aristocrat who throws his estate into ruin at the gambling house and with not a care for his charges. These people are not fit to govern. There really is nothing further to be said. As a group of people they are so far removed from their origins as a maritime explorer/ warrior caste I fail to see anything worth saving. Just to add, can we stop using upper middle class as a stand-in for upper class, we submit to their frame game by doing this.
@@twogermanys No, you completely misunderstand. Class is essential. Upper middle class is not upper class. The point is that the best of the aristocracy was weakened and then effectively broken in the 19th and early 20thCs. This left the type of aristocract you're talking about, the one with litle regard for noblesse oblige, to come to the fore, much in the same way that people like Katie Hopkins are brought to the fore in the media: to shift the landscape. The upper and middle middle classes imitate this type of class 2 aristocrat precisely because it is the model and behaviour that works for them; it is what is deemed an acceptable form of tradition because it is not threatening. Any analysis of Britain that refuses to engage with the question of class and simply tries to flatten out the society so it can make sense to the Europeans or Americans is deeply flawed. The upper middle classes of today, whose narrative the Tory Boys are espousing, work for hedge funds and law firms, they are not landed gentry. They are not the same thing.
Maybe you should give this video a bit of a boost given current events AA? Could gain some limited but useful traction.
Yes, the only acceptable "far" right-wing path is that which attacks the islamic/arab, especially if in defence of the tribe...This position at its root is still almost entirely liberal.
More importantly, it's deferred. It's like the girl who strings along her 'friend'. Just do this one thing then, well, maybe something will happen, you know. Once whatever is required is done, the hinted at or promised/hoped for end never comes. In other words, becoming a useful id.
Modern liberal. early 20th centruy british liberals supported Arab Nationalism
Good luck in your never ending search for a true Scotsman.
0:51 the Distributist
We're all Iranians now
AA is Peter Hitchens. Anyone who acts can never be good enough. Pure thought will save us. Not.
That's unfair to Hitchens. He's spent decades in action, and has given up in 2010, when the Tories won on a New Labour platform. He was doing all he could to convince people to let the Tory Party die, so an actual conservative movement could be built. And after such a moment was missed, he gave up.
You can't say he merely spent his time pouting.
Very unfair to Hitchens. Forgive him any minor character blemish, the man never fell for any neo movement, like Thatcherism or trickle down, in the way Scruton did. He knows his role and sticks to it dutifully - which is recording history and culture of a civilisation that is dismantling, for the sake of posterity. That's allowed him to stay in the game and be absolutely spot on back in March 2020, for example. He sought out principles and applies them, even at the cost of strategy or refusing to even play the game, which seems the obviously sensible thing to do in the given circumstances.
@@Mr___X Wow what a hero he never participated in any right wing movement but just attacked them all from the sidelines, sowing doubt and confusion at every opportunity. The most charitable interpretation is that his primary goal is to 'look smart' when every movement inevitably fails (as all political movements must, on a long enough time frame). A more realistic take would consider if he ever really stopped being a Trotskyist or just wised up about how to go about it.
@@joemerino3243 Jesus wept
@@Mr___X Hitchens took the jab; he's playing the game.
Your audience are long convinced by now that networks of powerful you-know-hews are behind much of it.
Keen now to hear what you propose should be done about it.
There is no 2nd or 3rd worlds...there is only future Britains.
N'now p'please don't hurt me Mr. Afghan.
I would have loved it and, simultaneously, would have absolutely hated it being British.
You are not capable of beibg British. You do not know what it is to be British . Your opinion is irrelevant. Focus on your declining country.
We should've had numbers and names of everyone in Afghanistan we worked with and got them out asap... And any Afghan who wasn't one or a relative or young child ... We shouldve left them ... A 1950's metropolitan Iranian coming to the UK and their children had a better chance to assimilate into British culture ... But the average person from the 3rd world just can't unless they strive to come here
I think the decline of the civic expectations in Britain and much of Europe means it is very easy for newcomers to adapt. If they're in mainstream education, most will adapt.
@@Mr___X in my very recent experience that's not true at all sadly
@@arnoldtabor3767 The point I'm making is that the future of Britain is currently becoming more amenable to the newcomer. JD Sports adverts are like a big wake up call for the rest of the country for what the future looks like.
Who is the guy in the image at 14:37?
Ezra Levant
So we're saying Tory Boys are Feds? Or Mark Collett is a Fed?
Everyone is a Fed.
Anybody who counter-signals the only real opposition to woke is a fed. For Britain will be in the field when AA is forgotten.
@@FiveLiver Britain first, for Britain, PA, BNP, EDL. Funny, there seems to be a different one each week.
@@TheLifesentence2278 everyone who disagrees with me is a fed
@Confucius_76 most of the people who agree with me are feds as well. All vessels for agent Smith.
1. Well in Israel's favour it is a muscular, law-bound, ethno-state that can and does accomidate minorities who play by their rules. I dislike it's covid-tyranny and violent matriarchy but for all that if we are seriously looking for a successful, real world, warts and all model then we could do a lot worse than Israel. It's not cute but it works and despite the antipathy of the UN and the left world wide, it exists. Importantly they don't give a monkey's about what anyone thinks about them. I would also recommend Malaysia and Singapore but as covid has demonstrated there is a real gulf between Asian and Western culture and as much as we may want to we simply cannot do things that they do automatically. 2. Also I would note that utterly human outrage at state crimes such as Rotherham and Telford are the starting point. If these outrages were not a call to action then what loyalty could one possibly have to one's kith and kin? It is true that what AA calls "counter-jihad" does not meaninful challenge the overall frame of clasical Liberalism. Like anti-Communism before it simply wants to preserve the post Glorious Revolution status quo from creed inherently hostile to Western civilisation that have been weaponised and leveraged to do maximum damage against us by the broader leftist culture and establishment. However both drive the Left literally insane and are treated as an existential threat of the highest order. Tommy Robinson has endured far more than any post-Liberal ever has and is a genuine dissident. Persisting with this is not only the right thing to do but also helps preserve the West and does more than anything else to drive the powers that be into an insane, paranoid, moustache man in the bunker style death spiral. Also you can only start with and work within the frame that you have inherited. The trick is to understand how this came about as a an inevitable logical consequence of Liberalism and to start imagining a post Liberal framework.
sounds about right, but if you use paragraphs, your correct point will be more easily understood
AA has been listening to Morgoth
Looking forward to 110, that is all.
I don't consider Iranians/Persians a natural enemy of ours.
Persians share descent from the (Indo-)Aryans, so as far as non Europeans go, maybe we should see them in a friendly capacity.
That's a wilfully childish take on what I'm saying, your ancestors are disappointed.
Inshallah brother we have a lot of common ground. (Fake yt name)
Naive. The Iranian regime is an Islamic Republic; they are governed by the commands of Allah to_conquer_kill_or_enslave you, bone_head.
I used to watch Eurotrash. Not sure I listened much.
This is Amazing!
Yorkshire CCC is the future we deserve
What’s wrong with Mark Collett?
"Just more gentle" yes or put more simply SPINELESS.
This this this! They are afraid, it's that simple. It would simply be unbritish to man up in their eyes.
I don't think that bloke is anti-Iranian, I think he was just going for the hypocrisy angle.
It's all so tiresome
Thanks, AA
Those bois are fine as they are. Just export them to Germany.
I like Raheem….
Thanks AA
Totally on point!
I love the TMNT reference
Great video AA!
It is easy to criticise and put others down for their work, but hard to create something of value. Some of the people you mentioned help people on their way of thinking differently, in my opinion.
Without people like AA blasting them for their failings such people will only become worse. Leave your feminine sensibilities for those who need it.
That just isn't the case in reality though, look at the reach they have compared to the actual dissidents. If they didn't exist all those ears would be on the genuine radicals. Why do you think they are so promoted?
@@admontblanc why the gendering, sir? How do you know what / who I am and the relevance it has to my opinion?
when will you start publishing books?
i would have replied to that guy, yeh if there ever was something that was always british is for others and their ideologies to be "stepped over".
I wish. Your statement covers the medieval period does it? You know nothing of Britain; the history of which extends beyond Hollywood movies and your infantile mewling. Your wretched culture is largely about stepping upon others and their "ideologies".
@@harveyepstein6265 i am aware of the history of my country. to say i know nothing of britain is your first false assumption. your second false assumption is your swipe about hollywood. i stopped watching tv after 9-11. not more than maybe 24 hours of it since then, when forced to while visiting others. though i have watched some netflix since october, maybe a dozen hours. i spend my evenings reading and watching videos like these and browsing and doing searches about things i read in internet comment sections and anything else i havent heard of. i am not some tiktoker, you wounded redcoat.
my culture is in a battle of british and european 'ideologies', fascism and communism. we used to have our own binary. jeffersons central govt, and hamiltons states rights. now even our ideology has been colonized and imperialized by you dregs across the pond.
the whole world is being colonized by the eurasian superstate and the j3w1sh/m4s0n marx/schwab new order of the world.
now quit your tears about my lack of praise and the fate of your country and get in this war.
Have you listened to Sheena Mason and her view on race versus culture? Just wondered what your thoughts were if you had.
Loved this one.
Point 2 and 3 are absolutely true. Even as a non politically aware person I always thought the Dutch Party for Freedom run by Geert Wilders was honestly anti-Islam and pro-Western. But then I saw him denounce anti-gay attacks just to score points against Turkish and Islamic people which confused me. Turns out Islam bashing is an allowable target but being slightly critical of gay rights isn't. And of course Wilders has such relations as pointed out in 4.
Demographics is destiny, the greatest threat to the ethnic Brit.
Who here owns XRP?
not sure if i understood the video, maybe i need to watch more.