Maybe Gaijin should reduce the BR range that you can be bunched with at higher tiers. Maybe instead of 10.7-11.7, it should be 10.7-11.3 or 11.0 to 11.7 and then 12.0-12.7, just an idea but doubtful they will do it
@@WarhammerWeekEndTimes This method is way less likely to even happen. To avoid having void BR's is too have more vehicles in those BR's. The only reason why some tiers are just unplayable is literally because we are too compressed.
I just keep getting uptiered to 12.0 constantly when playing Finnish MiG-21BIS, cant wait till they add Finnish F/A-18, than ill play Swedish tree again.
I'm grinding the Italy TT for that marvelous top tier. The thing is I want to talisman'd a rank VII aircraft. I'mma 'bout to finish MIG-21MF and I'm thinking of MIG-21BIS or MIG-23MF. What should I do? And btw, I'm super bad at F-104, so it's no option for me. Great video!!
@@arcticwolfxxii9236 I somehow still believe r60m would be better based on its born year, should be a bit more advanced than R13M1 I think R13M1 looks a bit more flare-resistant because we know it is an AAM only with rare aspects, so you will unconsciously use it only when you are after someone. However since R60M is all aspect, you will use it more other than rare purpose. So when the dice roll, it makes R60M flare-resistant seem worse than R13M1. Kind of like survivorship bias
@@Anthony1102www yeah not quite survivorship, now it may just have a smaller IR cone then the r60m which theoretically could give it better flare resistance.
Maybe Gaijin should reduce the BR range that you can be bunched with at higher tiers. Maybe instead of 10.7-11.7, it should be 10.7-11.3 or 11.0 to 11.7 and then 12.0-12.7, just an idea but doubtful they will do it
BR Compression is a good idea according to this dude
A way for the decompression to work for sure, while not leaving so many large BR gaps at higher tiers
@@WarhammerWeekEndTimes This method is way less likely to even happen.
To avoid having void BR's is too have more vehicles in those BR's.
The only reason why some tiers are just unplayable is literally because we are too compressed.
A pro tip for the mig-21 BIS.
If you keep your altitude above 2km, you wont rip your wings. So its nice to get some quick speed and escape.
things look a bit brighter for the bis with the coming br changes. Only the f14a at the top of its bracket and all f16 and mig 29 well outside of it.
I just spaded Bis few days ago, and dear God I don't want ever to play it again. That BR range is pure hell. Stay away from 11.0
It’s good
I just keep getting uptiered to 12.0 constantly when playing Finnish MiG-21BIS, cant wait till they add Finnish F/A-18, than ill play Swedish tree again.
@tec
Can you cover hmd not working in sim so we can please get this fixed... hmd isn't working on anything. Mig 29, f4j, f16c, and f15c
will you do a video on the standard TAM anytime soon as you made a video on the TAM2c a bit ago
I'm grinding the Italy TT for that marvelous top tier. The thing is I want to talisman'd a rank VII aircraft. I'mma 'bout to finish MIG-21MF and I'm thinking of MIG-21BIS or MIG-23MF. What should I do? And btw, I'm super bad at F-104, so it's no option for me. Great video!!
i have to ask is
Does R13M1 have a better flare-resistant than R60M?
I would say yes, from experience I've hit a lot more r13 shots on people that are flaring then r60ms
@@arcticwolfxxii9236 I somehow still believe r60m would be better based on its born year, should be a bit more advanced than R13M1
I think R13M1 looks a bit more flare-resistant because we know it is an AAM only with rare aspects, so you will unconsciously use it only when you are after someone. However since R60M is all aspect, you will use it more other than rare purpose. So when the dice roll, it makes R60M flare-resistant seem worse than R13M1. Kind of like survivorship bias
@@Anthony1102www I've used both rear aspect, r60m always gets 1 flared, r13m usually ignores some.
@@arcticwolfxxii9236 that....would be strange...
@@Anthony1102www yeah not quite survivorship, now it may just have a smaller IR cone then the r60m which theoretically could give it better flare resistance.
The Mig-29s have R-27ERs at 12.0. Dont go railing on the F-14A
2 SARH vs 6 ARH
@@2goober4u ARH miisiles are not strong if the pilot on the receiving end isnt braindead
@@Zealot2024 "ARH missiles are not strong" you sure?
@Zealot2024 not that strong? You can fly the 29 and il fly in the 14 and drain your balls all day.
@@Zealot2024 cope harder american main