Excellent breakdown Kathy. I need things like this detailed like you have just done as obviously I'm not an American citizen & we don't have such rights over here. Thank you for continuing your hard work on this case. Bless you 🙏🏽 💫💙💫
Well narrated with such a clear concise voice. You may know , does A.T. ever need to apply to the actual judge for a court fees proposal for her planned costs of defense actions . ? ? That may have been the reasoning for the ex-parte hearing this week ? ?
Thank you for your kind words Jack. It is difficult to know as so much is under seal. Yours is a solid possible theory in my opinion due to the parallel entire sealed separate civil case CV29-2328 (Latah Co) regarding financial resources for Idaho v. Kohberger criminal proceeding.. We addressed this issue a couple months back in the Indiezone podcast www.listennotes.com/podcasts/kathys-indiezone/episode-289-the-secret-civil-oLSNhqfCUE9/
This is very educating. ❤
Excellent breakdown Kathy.
I need things like this detailed like you have just done as obviously I'm not an American citizen & we don't have such rights over here.
Thank you for continuing your hard work on this case.
Bless you 🙏🏽
💫💙💫
thank you Mistie for your kind words and support! Kathy x
I fully agree. We have similar laws but the names, the language you use in the US is way different. I'm learning a lot from you. @@commercialzone4141
Well narrated with such a clear concise voice. You may know , does A.T. ever need to apply to the actual judge for a court fees proposal for her planned costs of defense actions . ? ? That may have been the reasoning for the ex-parte hearing this week ? ?
Thank you for your kind words Jack. It is difficult to know as so much is under seal. Yours is a solid possible theory in my opinion due to the parallel entire sealed separate civil case CV29-2328 (Latah Co) regarding financial resources for Idaho v. Kohberger criminal proceeding.. We addressed this issue a couple months back in the Indiezone podcast www.listennotes.com/podcasts/kathys-indiezone/episode-289-the-secret-civil-oLSNhqfCUE9/
@commercialzone4141 💙
ExParte meeting, per the requested order from AT, was to discuss motion(s), regarding the possibility of evidence being destroyed or altered.
Another excellent, in depth and concise report, that explains these court proceedings so that a “caveman” such as myself can understand.
Thank you.