Skool vs Circle Detailed Community Platform Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 13

  • @tightknitai
    @tightknitai 15 дней назад +2

    Amazing breakdown Bri! Skool is fascinating because one could make the argument it's barely a community platform at all, and more like a social network with "Groups" being the foremost element of the platform. They'll get you members because of the network effect of sitting inside of Skool's walls and domain. Very different business model when you don't control the relationship with your member.

    • @emberconsulting
      @emberconsulting  14 дней назад

      Thanks Tight Knit Team! I think that's a really good point. They've definitely crested the tipping point into getting the network effect. Which can be beneficial if you're the most worried about finding people, but you're exactly right in that your forfeit that relationship with your member. I still prefer Slack communities where you get the network effect, but you own the relationship.

  • @justinorodriguez
    @justinorodriguez 15 дней назад +3

    It’s always great to hear your take on community platforms. Continues to be incredibly valuable.

  • @SarahNoelBlock
    @SarahNoelBlock 14 дней назад +2

    The note about Mighty Networks being overly complicated. YES. LOL

  • @TheHistorian
    @TheHistorian 14 дней назад +1

    Very well done Bri!

    • @emberconsulting
      @emberconsulting  14 дней назад

      thank you David! Appreciate the encouragement :)

  • @JohanVenterELearning
    @JohanVenterELearning 4 дня назад +1

    I like your observation about gamification. I think it is meant for younger people, school kids that want to level-up and earn badges. Like Scouts or Guides (do they still have those movements?) Udemy seems to have a system in place that when instructors post answers to the questions of another instructor, the answering instructor earns a title (I forget the titles now) something like 'Seeker' , 'Advisor' or 'Pro-advisor'. These titles appear behind their names when they engage in the community of instructors. I felt that was more appropriate than badges or leaderboards.

    • @emberconsulting
      @emberconsulting  3 дня назад

      I like that moderator-style approach to gamification - thank you for sharing!

  • @Huge008
    @Huge008 14 дней назад +1

    ''Good engagement is your members creating valuable exchanges. IF gamification can accurately quantify the value of your members exchanged online, and reward them accordingly and transparently, amazing.'' Put that in a frame. Completely agree.
    I see it more as a cherry on top, a nice to have (if well implemented.) To make it the whole basis of the platform is misguided IMO. As you point out, it also creates this potentially harmful hierarchy and ''status game'' within your community. The carrot of gamification isn't the reason why people should engage.

    • @emberconsulting
      @emberconsulting  14 дней назад

      Haha, thank you! 💯 the rightful place is the cherry on top, not the foundation for your engagement strategy.

  • @financialsforcreatives
    @financialsforcreatives 12 дней назад +1

    Thank you for speaking out loud what I’ve been sensing about the bro vibe on Skool. It’s very off putting no matter how simple the platform is.

    • @emberconsulting
      @emberconsulting  10 дней назад +1

      it's such a bummer because I think of all of the platforms, they are the most simple and accessible, but you're no the only one who feels that way.