I think textures will be extremely high resolution and detailed. Right now, things look amazing from a distance, but when you get close to a texture it doesn’t look too great.
For me, the sound design in this game is what really anchors you into the environment on top of this already gorgeous graphical achievement. I imagine in a few years time we will look back on this and think how fake it looked.
Imho. Isn't it obvious that this is a fake today? Where is realism? Several days ago I have watched UE 5.1 teaser and there were some kind of realistic stuff. But RDR 2 with even 100+++++ mods doesn't make this feeling.
yeah I wish latetly we have been getting garbage games releasing left and right when red dead came out I practically lived in that game now days people don't know what people really want on some female sh
@@Vadim_D True, but it's RDR2 with 100 mods, not UE5, and therefore it is impressive. The only way I get fooled by realism-graphics is when the video is low res 360/240p. Try 360/240p on this video and you indeed gonna notice no realism feeling at all. Try it on UE5 stuff and it's a guessing game of reality vs UE5.
I feel like this type of gaming technology can be used as legit time travel at some point. Especially fully immersed in VR. Legit feel like living in the 1800's
The problem: we cannot simulate the real past. We often know a lot but never 100%. But yeah, photo realistic VR for past, present or future simulations is a dream that will become real.
Seeing this makes me confident that in order to achieve true hyperrealism, we really need to focus on the character model and the subtle interactions with the environment because that is really the only major remaining factor that allows immediate differentiation between in-game and reality.
I agree. When they walk through the plants and they just clip through them instead of the plants bending around them it just ruins it and looks like fake trash.
but this wont happened, because it require insane amount of code and programmation. just look at bf5 vs previous battlefield games, they remove visual legs and many movements animation for the body, in exchange of what? useless ray tracing? no thanks...
Nah youd need generative AI based coding and sound design. Basically another universe like our own otherwise the brain will always feel that something is off
It doesn't seem like that long ago I was looking at the original COD, Far Cry1 or HL2 and saying to myself how mind-blowing these games looked. Well damn have games come a long way since then though!
When I was a small child I used to dream of playing inside a video game that was just a 3D photograph, real in every way but touch and feel. And here we are 30 years later, on the precipice. Amazing.
Isn't it remarkable. So many things in society move very slowly but computer techology is order of magnitude faster. I can't believe what today's best games can render. It's mindblowing!
The dedication of the countless incredible artists working at Rockstar Games speaks for itself. I cannot wait to see what they are able to pull off in GTA 6 with the more powerful hardware at their disposal
Glad you credit the artists and developers and not “rockstar.” These games are beautiful despite rockstar not because of it. I have a friend that works there. It’s not a great place to work but they are very passionate about those games. Still, they lose a lot of talent because of the working conditions.
@@joelman1989 I can imagine. That’s usually what it is like for many artists working in the video game or movie industry. I have heard that Rockstar have made significant improvements in working conditions, but I cannot speak from first-hand experience.
When it comes to this, I'm really looking forward to seeing which will be faster, whether the graphics will be closer to reality or we will put our five senses into reality. I don't care if I can't go to space, but I want to live until then.
it's not just visually pleasing, the story is mind boggling too which makes it one of the best games of all time. I have played the story five times and it feels like a new experience every time. I hope rockstar makes a sequel some day.
Haha your comment just made me go check what resolution I was in and it automatically put me on 720. I am on my RTX4070 with i9 13th Gen so I just switched to 8k and it looks sooooooooo much better than what I initially saw. The only reason I can tell it's a game is because of the models and micro interactions going on within the footage. The colors, frames, and look all seem very close to real.
Well if you are watching it on a 4k or even an HD 1080p screen you're still getting what it looks like if rendered at 8k and then down sampled, which still gives more rounded curves, because more triangles. heh.
The only problem is people don`t have enough money to adopt 4K meaning all games even though it supports 4K res doesn`t have 4K textures and when it does they complain about the size. I downloaded high res textures for Fallout 4. It was a 55GB download. The game without it is only like 30something GB.
Uncanny valley really only happens because of bad animations. You can throw all the photo realism you want at a game, but if the facial expressions and body movements aren't done correctly, it's gonna look strange.
And yes unfortunately at 8K you notice in most of the games that the textures are very rarely built for 8K, so some grainyness etc etc. The future is here now though !
I also think the water needs a bit of work. Too turbulent and the waves don't break properly so you have relatively large swells essentially at the shore line
It's the volumetric clouds in this game that sell it for me. The ground surface level is all just textures and models, but most of your general viewing experience involves the sky because most gameplay takes place in outdoor environments. That they made a believable sky and weather system is something 4k or Raytracing cannot do. It was Rockstar that ultimately made this game an utterly insane immersive experience and you could get that without 4k/Raytracing. The sky, the realistic weather, and the absolute impeccable lighting during all of the weather scenarios (which the Reshade takes total advantage of). Light transferring through clouds to give the god-rays effects and all. There was likely an immense and years-long effort done to make the sky as perfect as possible. edit: Water needs work though. In real life you almost never see the teal discoloration of water, and the occasions in which you do have the same rules as subsurface scattering with the added problem that the sky tones have to exactly match what would cause said refraction. An early sunset cannot produce this even under any circumstances. You have to be the right position and at the right time of day with the right cloud coverage to see the light refract in that way.
I was amazed at this game and did absolutely everything it had to offer on a PS4 pro! I would transcend into it if i played it at these specs and never look back.
actually even at lower specs rdr2 is way better , the ps4/xbox version is the low settings of pc version , u can revisited on pc on 1080p and it'll look way better on ultra or high
When people used to say "I can't wait to see what games look like in the future" in the ps2 days, well RDR2 represents that perfectly, we're living in that future.
Call me crazy but I actually think this looks worse than the original. I notice this sometimes when people scale up games to modern hardware. It’s like there’s too much lighting, reflections, surface textures, etc and it crosses back over into not looking realistic.
It's not how it scales up to a 4090, it's the reshade that was added. On a 4090 the game should have a more muted look, even with the sliders maxed out, allowing you to see more detail than we see in this video
@@kyle_284 Ok, I’m not claiming to know what specifically is causing the issue. Just noting that, to my eye at least, it is a noticeable issue is many cases where people are playing maxed out games on super high-end hardware. There are certain elements that can make a game look more realistic when added in moderation, but when cranked to the max can actually make it look less realistic, because it’s almost like real life isn’t _that_ intense. With the reflections, lighting, textures and all the rest.
You know what I was thinking about today. No matter how realistic graphics get, how amazing a video game is, how lifelike it looks and all the details and music and everything. I don't think it will ever give the same feeling as traveling somewhere new. I'm a life long gamer and absolutely love games. They can evoke a lot of emotions and are amazing. Can those feelings compare to an amazing trip somewhere? I realize they are two different things too but also share similarities, they're both escapes. I was just thinking about it, what would you rather have? A dream vacation or a 4090? If you had to choose.
A "dream vacation" assumes that it's always been a dream for you to go to this vacation spot. This means that regardless of what happens there, there must be unforgettable memories. I will also assume that if you were an avid gamer, that means that you don't vacation very much. It also assumes that you're already atleast somewhat desensitized to the experience of obtaining an upgrade to a computer. Emotionally speaking, a dream vacation would be more unforgettable. However, this goes the same vice-versa. If you vacation alot, but don't game alot, then a 4090 would be emotionally better for you. But if you vacation alot, then does it not mean that you have enough money to buy a 4090? Questions... and no answers.
@@harant8036 Very true. They're wonderful journeys that would otherwise not be possible. A one or two week vacation is nice and yet owning a 4090 is years and years of joy. Of course a two week vacation or even one week can be a life changing event too that can stick with you for years also.
this game is another timeless master peice, they matched the story to the graphics, I still love red dead 1 the most but they made a true sequel in a lot of ways here. I say it Again and Again.
I am 25 years old now. I will definitely remind my grandchildren and children of this game when the time comes. Because it is one of the most perfect games to be seen in the world.
this will probably look silly to your grandchildren who will be living inside video games that looks like real life and even feel it with haptic vests and accessories
Doubt your interest will continue when your grandchildren arrive. If it's merely about graphics, it would be completely outperformed, when your grandchildren's are old enough. You would probably just hang around in the matrix showing your grandchildren the local brothel in Saint Denis in 1895, and Rockstar would charge you with a 10m ad about eating vegetables.
@@АндрейРощин-х6л Problem is we might reach a point where they can`t make things smaller. Once they reach 1nanometer things is going to get much harder to improve.
@@Dewalt-mh1dz true moore's law, i think isn't really valid anymore as you said once they reach 1nanometer things are going to be harder to improve. I think that they should come up with a new chip or new pc hardware but that just me and probably won't happen any time soon maybe in 20 to 30 years' time. 🤷♂
@@DivineBaihu there are some technologies on the horizon that might make that possible. but I think it ll take another 20-40 years until they are usable by consumers. e.g. quantum pcs and organic pcs. but btw, 1 nm is not the border. there are still improvements to be made. I don't know what the minimum size is but I think a few more iterations are in there. less than 1 nm that is. btw, quantum computing is no dream or vision. it already exists. not like fusion reactors that are still not giving out more energy than you pump into them to start them. organic pcs are very much in the early stages. but if you think of new architectures with organic cpus... like real ai embedded then i think that will take at least 50 years to have some usable results. another topic are nanomachines. that s something to be excited for. :)
my biggest problem with the enviorement graphics getting better and better is that somehow the character graphics specially for human beeings are so much behind that they often feel like they are in the wrong place compared to everything else, they somehow dosent make any progress in that
There are several problems with that. First off, we are social creatures and thus extremely good at reading body language and facial expressions and especially eyes. Very small movements are extremely important. Whenever animators try to to go for realism they easilly fall into the "uncanny valley" which is when something looks real but feels very wrong. Its much easier to do something that is obviously fake like a cartoon character. Skin is also a hard texture to recreate. It has several layers and interacts with light in a special way. Not to mention you have different pigments, sweat, hair, skin texture, contractions/skin folding and muscle movements to worry about.
@@abram730 not sure, i play a lot of vr and when im playing games like Vallheim in Vr it takes about 15 to 30 min and im completly in. It nearly seems like the phsysiks and looks become my new reality for the amount of time im in there. This took some time and this effekt wasnt there right at the start. For example the first time i felt it was when i held the cam corder in phasmophobia vr and looked though it. I could FEEL the cam corder for real. The bad Graphics didnt changed anything for me it felt so real and it tricked my brain.
Looks amazing but we need more focus on things like feet and hands making realistic contact with objects around them...the way the plants bend etc....I'd take realistic hand/feet/body contact with surrounding objects over more resolution any day
The image is so detailed and sharp that you begin to see some errors on shadows when they get close to the players body (you can see clearly at 0:53 the rock's shawdow near player's right arm). I thing they will correct it for the next games thinking on 8k resolution...
It looks good but this is where running 8k or even 4k doesn't improve it much. It still looks like current day graphics. All the resolution in the world isn't going to transform anything but your wallet. Game design is what improves the graphics mostly. 4k or 8k just means you spent 2-5k on a PC vs 1k. Also how big your screen is vs viewing distance will determine how important higher resolution is. If you play on a 24" then 1080p is fine. 27"-32" 1440p is fine. 42" + can run 4k all depending on viewing distance. 10ft away on a 42" screen you might as well just run 1080p now a 100" screen then of course 4k. I just finally bought a gaming rich TV for the family room and I sit about 9-10ft away. 65" screen at that distance is still hard to see the sharpness over 1080p. I could easily go up to 75" to be able to see better the improved clarity.
I am so happy I am 22 years old. When I was 11, I experienced RDR1 and was in awe of how realistic the game looked and felt. I cannot even begin to imagine what games will look like another 10 or even 20 years from now. I am incredibly excited for the future. And grateful for what we have in the present.
It's funny how people are saying in the comments the graphics are great. Yes they're great if you're watching this on an 8K TV. I'm still getting used to gaming in 4K @ 120. Its going to be years before 8K gaming becomes a thing. 8K TVs are still expensive, and not everyone has one, especially 8K OLED TVs. The cheapest 8K OLED you can buy is $10,000. Also, the RTX 4090 is insanely expensive. For a graphics card that expensive, I would wait until the price drops.
Realism has little to do with resolution only. Too many variables are in play, like lighting, shadows, textures etc. 8K will simply not be sustainable in terms of power consumption of monitors and GPUs. You can have an ultra realistic graphics even on 1080p on a smaller screen, provided that the aforementioned traits are covered.
Se ve muy realista pero, en sentido grafico estamos llegando al limite, el gran avance en visuales se va a dar cuando busquen formas de hacer el gameplay mas fluido. Por ejemplo creando mejores metodos para hacer mas discreto el pop-in de las texturas o iluminaciones.
Результаты: Red Dead Redemption 2 в 4K, пресет Ultra- 90 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 4K, пресет Ultra и с DLSS Quality - 95 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 2K, пресет Ultra - 123 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 1080, пресет Ultra - 138 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 8K, пресет Ultra - 31 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 8K, пресет Ultra и с DLSS Performance - 62 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 12K, пресет Ultra - 16 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 12K, пресет Low - 21 fps. Red Dead Redemption в 16K, пресет Low - 2 fps.
Hi ! You seem to have figured out a way to get rid of the pop-in shadows at the edge of the screen (caused by screen space shadows). Could you tell us how? Thanks ^^
@@geimenberg1718 No, I believe it is unintentionally created by SSAO or something. Especially noticeable on mountains for example, shadows are added on screen while moving the camera around.
Not a whole lot different visually from the vanilla look. Lights are still just as volumetric, sun still feels hot and the haze of the day still feels real. I'm sure theres plenty going on under the hood but I've been playing it recently and this isnt really a different experience.
Guarma in RDR2 gives me an idea of what gta 6 could look like fully rendered out, Obviously GTA 6 Will have way more fidelity as it will come out 8-9 years after this game but crazy how that island and weather just looks absolutely breathtaking
I don't think the water waves effects look that good seem to flow a little over the top in cove areas where wave direction flows in at an angle it shouldn't do
![Gucci Mane & Sexyy Red - You Don't Love Me [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/j7IBqyFKT4c/mqdefault.jpg)
This is insanity just imagine graphics 10 years from now
So much contrast...
Too bad we can't have this as our current gen. We have to wait just to play what will be old games as they should've been.
Probably will stay the Same, more or less
I think textures will be extremely high resolution and detailed. Right now, things look amazing from a distance, but when you get close to a texture it doesn’t look too great.
I think immersive VR is the future of gaming. Although pretty far away.
For me, the sound design in this game is what really anchors you into the environment on top of this already gorgeous graphical achievement. I imagine in a few years time we will look back on this and think how fake it looked.
Imho. Isn't it obvious that this is a fake today? Where is realism? Several days ago I have watched UE 5.1 teaser and there were some kind of realistic stuff. But RDR 2 with even 100+++++ mods doesn't make this feeling.
yeah I wish latetly we have been getting garbage games releasing left and right when red dead came out I practically lived in that game now days people don't know what people really want on some female sh
@@Vadim_D sure but it is only a modded game and not specific a tech demo
What about the story
@@Vadim_D True, but it's RDR2 with 100 mods, not UE5, and therefore it is impressive.
The only way I get fooled by realism-graphics is when the video is low res 360/240p. Try 360/240p on this video and you indeed gonna notice no realism feeling at all. Try it on UE5 stuff and it's a guessing game of reality vs UE5.
I feel like this type of gaming technology can be used as legit time travel at some point. Especially fully immersed in VR. Legit feel like living in the 1800's
watch Westworld
The real world doesn't look this beautiful
The problem: we cannot simulate the real past. We often know a lot but never 100%. But yeah, photo realistic VR for past, present or future simulations is a dream that will become real.
VR in 10-15 years is going to be unimaginable.
how?
it looks cartoony.
Seeing this makes me confident that in order to achieve true hyperrealism, we really need to focus on the character model and the subtle interactions with the environment because that is really the only major remaining factor that allows immediate differentiation between in-game and reality.
I agree. When they walk through the plants and they just clip through them instead of the plants bending around them it just ruins it and looks like fake trash.
but this wont happened, because it require insane amount of code and programmation.
just look at bf5 vs previous battlefield games, they remove visual legs and many movements animation for the body, in exchange of what? useless ray tracing? no thanks...
@@Tonyx.yt. AI might remove need for a lot of that work going into the future.
Nah youd need generative AI based coding and sound design. Basically another universe like our own otherwise the brain will always feel that something is off
When gaming AI actually becomes AI, then it's over. Everything is scripted in games, so ofc it's far from being realistic.
3:37 What a view !! 😍
i have 100% faith in square enix to deliver best possible, with everyone contributing you can expect good thing
It doesn't seem like that long ago I was looking at the original COD, Far Cry1 or HL2 and saying to myself how mind-blowing these games looked. Well damn have games come a long way since then though!
can you imagine being a kid nowdays? popopo....
@@brucewayne5554 They're all going to grow up into a permanent existential crisis because of these friggin graphics.
I loved playing through Black Mesa. Felt like a modern remake of HL
@@n3r3m4c It'll be heading to 3d with higher than this level of quality and ray tracing.
Same, my dad walked in on me when playing Infamous and thought I was watching a movie.
Ok finally a gameplay with 8K60 in title that is not a clickbait
Yeah you can see in the city it drops below 60fps but yeah outside of the city having 8k at that fps is really special
When I was a small child I used to dream of playing inside a video game that was just a 3D photograph, real in every way but touch and feel. And here we are 30 years later, on the precipice. Amazing.
Isn't it remarkable. So many things in society move very slowly but computer techology is order of magnitude faster. I can't believe what today's best games can render. It's mindblowing!
soon you'll be spending years in an induced coma, hooked into the matrix (VR games), dopamine drip, pooping into a tube.
peak humanity 🤣
@@chrishayes5755 while you write useless comments. You ain’t different.
We're not far from putting that in VR and making some pretty amazing simulations.
@@chrishayes5755 we already are
"close to realism"
Grass: **clips through leg**
you´ll live
remember that the game is also 6 years old
The dedication of the countless incredible artists working at Rockstar Games speaks for itself. I cannot wait to see what they are able to pull off in GTA 6 with the more powerful hardware at their disposal
i just came here for that too aha the hype of GTA 6
" 100+ mods"
Glad you credit the artists and developers and not “rockstar.”
These games are beautiful despite rockstar not because of it. I have a friend that works there. It’s not a great place to work but they are very passionate about those games. Still, they lose a lot of talent because of the working conditions.
@@joelman1989 I can imagine. That’s usually what it is like for many artists working in the video game or movie industry. I have heard that Rockstar have made significant improvements in working conditions, but I cannot speak from first-hand experience.
This game till this day, STILL SUPRISES ME... Story, Graphics and all.
thing is to update i have to restart the laptop, smtms im too lazy or doing smth else w it
including audio listening, its why i been asking for proper facilities here since most were just pending indefinitely, which demotivating really
When it comes to this, I'm really looking forward to seeing which will be faster, whether the graphics will be closer to reality or we will put our five senses into reality. I don't care if I can't go to space, but I want to live until then.
Never put your five senses into reality.
VR with full body tracking is quite amazing. Worth putting 2-3 senses into.
you will die before this. You will not have any opportunity to test this.
Meanwhile games in 2023: Best I can do is 540p at 30 fps upscaled to 4K
@@Pupixariowe get it Man you're struggling. Don't need to shout it out loud.
You risked your life to make this video for us. Thank you!
XD
its not that tragic, but yeah ive been in worse situation so its alright
@@iikatinggangsengii2471nice
think its referring to my 'learning era' which using old laptop to learn audio and playing ps1 games, good times nonetheless
it's not just visually pleasing, the story is mind boggling too which makes it one of the best games of all time. I have played the story five times and it feels like a new experience every time. I hope rockstar makes a sequel some day.
Totally agree. Btw, the sequel is the first Red Dead Redemption -- but I think you meant just a follow-up game.
I agree. I'm going to do a 4rd replay. This game is so meditative
I doubt anybody is watching this in 8k so we have no clue how good it really looks!
Haha your comment just made me go check what resolution I was in and it automatically put me on 720. I am on my RTX4070 with i9 13th Gen so I just switched to 8k and it looks sooooooooo much better than what I initially saw. The only reason I can tell it's a game is because of the models and micro interactions going on within the footage. The colors, frames, and look all seem very close to real.
Well if you are watching it on a 4k or even an HD 1080p screen you're still getting what it looks like if rendered at 8k and then down sampled, which still gives more rounded curves, because more triangles. heh.
@@molochino
I'm able to watch it on my macbook in 8k and the graphics are insane.
thanks2, true use best led possible for max experience, it doesnt have to be oled, many good ips are there on the market atm
I know my dream will be dream
Its not, you can use nvidia filter to make your game more beautiful...
@@Gameoverhub Agree!That’s pretty good
What?
nice dream
@@Gameoverhub how?
Well-made video, really enjoyed the atmosphere 👌
That is amazing, absolutely stunning, but I think graphics went so far it just hit a new uncanny valley, only now with environment textures
The only problem is people don`t have enough money to adopt 4K meaning all games even though it supports 4K res doesn`t have 4K textures and when it does they complain about the size. I downloaded high res textures for Fallout 4. It was a 55GB download. The game without it is only like 30something GB.
Indeed, but for me it is still the physics of objects that throw me for a loop.
Uncanny valley really only happens because of bad animations. You can throw all the photo realism you want at a game, but if the facial expressions and body movements aren't done correctly, it's gonna look strange.
the first ever youtuber who didn't post a animation made with CGI and tittaled the video with rtx gameplay.
The way gaming graphics have advanced makes me feel like we are at the end of the time.
I would love if Rockstar used this engine to make a Pirate themed game. Oh that would be incredible!
theyre for my portable entertainment purpose, first, if laptop only capable 1080 then be the best 1080 game
HOLY SHIT .
Looks like a movie and i know we havent even reached the peak yet ahaha xD
🤓
그래픽 퀄리티 지리네.. 특히 파도 표현은 가히 실사같다...ㄷㄷ
맵 오브젝트들의 자연스러운 배치와 고저차 표현은.. -0-
Liked and subscribed just for not clickbaiting "8K". It's actually real 8K that you could actually watch on an 8K TV. Amazing video
I watched this video in 720p and it still looked good. The resolution certainly helps but the graphics are just well done and beautiful as well...
And yes unfortunately at 8K you notice in most of the games that the textures are very rarely built for 8K, so some grainyness etc etc. The future is here now though !
I also think the water needs a bit of work. Too turbulent and the waves don't break properly so you have relatively large swells essentially at the shore line
@@jamesc3953 if you mess with the base settings you can get the water way better than default
Graphics are outstanding. Hope to see good gameplays in next gen games .
Unlikely. This game is a prime example of amazing graphics combined with absolutely shit controls and game play.
Wow, how beautiful. Almost felt like going out and seeing the real thing
Beautiful horse riding simulation, looks stunning!
Ok, now imagine how good looking GTA 6 sea could be!
i always say that im anticipating rockstar gamedev ability, but theyre more suitable for desktop pc, even if its good old gta5
contrary best old like skyrim or dirt 2-3 ill play on laptop, bcs i need good entertainment on the go lol
Let me know when the price will be close to realism as well.
the water looks stunning.
I just started downloading rdr 2 on my 4090 laptop, Can't wait
It's the volumetric clouds in this game that sell it for me. The ground surface level is all just textures and models, but most of your general viewing experience involves the sky because most gameplay takes place in outdoor environments. That they made a believable sky and weather system is something 4k or Raytracing cannot do. It was Rockstar that ultimately made this game an utterly insane immersive experience and you could get that without 4k/Raytracing. The sky, the realistic weather, and the absolute impeccable lighting during all of the weather scenarios (which the Reshade takes total advantage of). Light transferring through clouds to give the god-rays effects and all. There was likely an immense and years-long effort done to make the sky as perfect as possible.
edit: Water needs work though. In real life you almost never see the teal discoloration of water, and the occasions in which you do have the same rules as subsurface scattering with the added problem that the sky tones have to exactly match what would cause said refraction. An early sunset cannot produce this even under any circumstances. You have to be the right position and at the right time of day with the right cloud coverage to see the light refract in that way.
My top notch pc cannot even handle this youtube video🐸🐸
I was amazed at this game and did absolutely everything it had to offer on a PS4 pro! I would transcend into it if i played it at these specs and never look back.
actually even at lower specs rdr2 is way better , the ps4/xbox version is the low settings of pc version , u can revisited on pc on 1080p and it'll look way better on ultra or high
Imagine this game but you can enter every building you see and every room you enter is unique. Can't wait for something like that to be made.
@@GhostInTheShade gta 6?
Thats gta 6
When people used to say "I can't wait to see what games look like in the future" in the ps2 days, well RDR2 represents that perfectly, we're living in that future.
I am in love with this 😭
Love watching this on my 1080p monitor
Call me crazy but I actually think this looks worse than the original. I notice this sometimes when people scale up games to modern hardware. It’s like there’s too much lighting, reflections, surface textures, etc and it crosses back over into not looking realistic.
It's not how it scales up to a 4090, it's the reshade that was added. On a 4090 the game should have a more muted look, even with the sliders maxed out, allowing you to see more detail than we see in this video
@@kyle_284 Ok, I’m not claiming to know what specifically is causing the issue. Just noting that, to my eye at least, it is a noticeable issue is many cases where people are playing maxed out games on super high-end hardware. There are certain elements that can make a game look more realistic when added in moderation, but when cranked to the max can actually make it look less realistic, because it’s almost like real life isn’t _that_ intense. With the reflections, lighting, textures and all the rest.
You know what I was thinking about today. No matter how realistic graphics get, how amazing a video game is, how lifelike it looks and all the details and music and everything. I don't think it will ever give the same feeling as traveling somewhere new. I'm a life long gamer and absolutely love games. They can evoke a lot of emotions and are amazing. Can those feelings compare to an amazing trip somewhere? I realize they are two different things too but also share similarities, they're both escapes. I was just thinking about it, what would you rather have? A dream vacation or a 4090? If you had to choose.
Dream vacation of course, games can't give you that type of feelings
@@razvansaboanu937 A vacation is pointless. A complete waste of money.
but can you travel to space, or to 19th century? games are simulations of things you can not or don't want to experience in real life
A "dream vacation" assumes that it's always been a dream for you to go to this vacation spot. This means that regardless of what happens there, there must be unforgettable memories. I will also assume that if you were an avid gamer, that means that you don't vacation very much. It also assumes that you're already atleast somewhat desensitized to the experience of obtaining an upgrade to a computer. Emotionally speaking, a dream vacation would be more unforgettable.
However, this goes the same vice-versa. If you vacation alot, but don't game alot, then a 4090 would be emotionally better for you. But if you vacation alot, then does it not mean that you have enough money to buy a 4090? Questions... and no answers.
@@harant8036 Very true. They're wonderful journeys that would otherwise not be possible. A one or two week vacation is nice and yet owning a 4090 is years and years of joy. Of course a two week vacation or even one week can be a life changing event too that can stick with you for years also.
this game is another timeless master peice, they matched the story to the graphics, I still love red dead 1 the most but they made a true sequel in a lot of ways here. I say it Again and Again.
it looks nice just got mine rtx 4090 i gotta download the game! cant wait to play it
The water so realistic my keyboard got wet :D
me watching at 144p: magic
I am 25 years old now. I will definitely remind my grandchildren and children of this game when the time comes. Because it is one of the most perfect games to be seen in the world.
this will probably look silly to your grandchildren who will be living inside video games that looks like real life and even feel it with haptic vests and accessories
Doubt your interest will continue when your grandchildren arrive. If it's merely about graphics, it would be completely outperformed, when your grandchildren's are old enough. You would probably just hang around in the matrix showing your grandchildren the local brothel in Saint Denis in 1895, and Rockstar would charge you with a 10m ad about eating vegetables.
@@thomasnielsen5580 probably about eating bugs to stop climate change.
@@lobiankk77 a better prediction than mine.
No you won’t and you shouldn’t.
é incrível pensar o quanto os gráficos dos jogos mudou tanto em apenas 20 anos
Having a PC with these specs is my dream . You should be thankful brother ❤😊
The water in Nightingale looks very similar! I was so impressed I stand on the beach watching it until sunset. Then the stress test was over hahaha
amazing insane although yes very far from realism...there's still a long way to go before we reach cinematic-level realism
I think about 15-20 years to full realism in PC.
@@АндрейРощин-х6л Problem is we might reach a point where they can`t make things smaller. Once they reach 1nanometer things is going to get much harder to improve.
@@Dewalt-mh1dz true moore's law, i think isn't really valid anymore as you said once they reach 1nanometer things are going to be harder to improve. I think that they should come up with a new chip or new pc hardware but that just me and probably won't happen any time soon maybe in 20 to 30 years' time. 🤷♂
@@DivineBaihu there are some technologies on the horizon that might make that possible. but I think it ll take another 20-40 years until they are usable by consumers. e.g. quantum pcs and organic pcs. but btw, 1 nm is not the border. there are still improvements to be made. I don't know what the minimum size is but I think a few more iterations are in there. less than 1 nm that is. btw, quantum computing is no dream or vision. it already exists. not like fusion reactors that are still not giving out more energy than you pump into them to start them. organic pcs are very much in the early stages. but if you think of new architectures with organic cpus... like real ai embedded then i think that will take at least 50 years to have some usable results. another topic are nanomachines. that s something to be excited for. :)
@@caschque7242 I thought 1 nm was the point where quantum tunneling can occur and thats why it was said to be the limit
Thank you for this ride!
glad you enjoyed it :D
It doesn't even look that different from the normal game. Just goes to show what an incredibly beautiful game it already is.
Totally agree
The beginning beach part reminded me of far cry 6 so much
this game came out almost 5 years ago 5 fricking years and games that realse today cant even get near to this
my biggest problem with the enviorement graphics getting better and better is that somehow the character graphics specially for human beeings are so much behind that they often feel like they are in the wrong place compared to everything else, they somehow dosent make any progress in that
True, they need more work
There are several problems with that. First off, we are social creatures and thus extremely good at reading body language and facial expressions and especially eyes. Very small movements are extremely important. Whenever animators try to to go for realism they easilly fall into the "uncanny valley" which is when something looks real but feels very wrong. Its much easier to do something that is obviously fake like a cartoon character. Skin is also a hard texture to recreate. It has several layers and interacts with light in a special way. Not to mention you have different pigments, sweat, hair, skin texture, contractions/skin folding and muscle movements to worry about.
That issue is magnified in VR. You end up in the uncanny valley even with cartoon graphics.
@@abram730 not sure, i play a lot of vr and when im playing games like Vallheim in Vr it takes about 15 to 30 min and im completly in. It nearly seems like the phsysiks and looks become my new reality for the amount of time im in there. This took some time and this effekt wasnt there right at the start. For example the first time i felt it was when i held the cam corder in phasmophobia vr and looked though it. I could FEEL the cam corder for real. The bad Graphics didnt changed anything for me it felt so real and it tricked my brain.
Looks amazing but we need more focus on things like feet and hands making realistic contact with objects around them...the way the plants bend etc....I'd take realistic hand/feet/body contact with surrounding objects over more resolution any day
People are gonna be playing this on a 100 dollar phone in the future and complaining about the graphics
This is what it felt like graphics wise playing the game for the first time on Xbox
Thank you that was very relaxing to watch
Damn I'm in love 😍
Hopefully one day I'll have enough to afford a pc like this and try this kinda stuff out
in few years current pc and laptops will be cheap to buy
understandable, theyre humans too
As DLSS & Nanites get better, real time and pre-rendered to some extent will look closer than ever.
The image is so detailed and sharp that you begin to see some errors on shadows when they get close to the players body (you can see clearly at 0:53 the rock's shawdow near player's right arm). I thing they will correct it for the next games thinking on 8k resolution...
@Mr. King ???
3:38 Tree Textures: "alright, imma peace out".
“Close to realism” and also “runs through tall grass with no visible effect”
8k is the dream
This is stunning. To be able to play so smoothly at 8k. Incredible. Was this using dlss 3.0?
Red dead still no have dlss 3
2.3 he was using
allm
With the power of Unreal Engine 5 The game modding is going to be obsolete lol
@@zeus4634 then which can can bear it at 8k? i doub the rtx 4090
Daaaaamn that looks beautiful!! Not sure why it looks like Arthur is holding in a fart though.
This is my favorite game of all time. Played it 100% 3xs. Freaking amazing
Nest Level Gameplay Quality. 🔥🔥
I see this game, my heart races. What a masterpiece.
It looks good but this is where running 8k or even 4k doesn't improve it much. It still looks like current day graphics. All the resolution in the world isn't going to transform anything but your wallet. Game design is what improves the graphics mostly. 4k or 8k just means you spent 2-5k on a PC vs 1k. Also how big your screen is vs viewing distance will determine how important higher resolution is. If you play on a 24" then 1080p is fine. 27"-32" 1440p is fine. 42" + can run 4k all depending on viewing distance. 10ft away on a 42" screen you might as well just run 1080p now a 100" screen then of course 4k. I just finally bought a gaming rich TV for the family room and I sit about 9-10ft away. 65" screen at that distance is still hard to see the sharpness over 1080p. I could easily go up to 75" to be able to see better the improved clarity.
The only game that I can play over and over again and never get tired of is RDR2. Arthur
Gorgeous. Give it 10 more years. Can't wait to see what we'll have then.
I am so happy I am 22 years old. When I was 11, I experienced RDR1 and was in awe of how realistic the game looked and felt. I cannot even begin to imagine what games will look like another 10 or even 20 years from now. I am incredibly excited for the future. And grateful for what we have in the present.
Looking where the world is going, it won't be anything in 10-20yrs.
@@MalinowyWampir What you on kid?
@@goldytwatus1674 He is on your mom that's for sure.
It's funny how people are saying in the comments the graphics are great. Yes they're great if you're watching this on an 8K TV. I'm still getting used to gaming in 4K @ 120. Its going to be years before 8K gaming becomes a thing. 8K TVs are still expensive, and not everyone has one, especially 8K OLED TVs. The cheapest 8K OLED you can buy is $10,000. Also, the RTX 4090 is insanely expensive. For a graphics card that expensive, I would wait until the price drops.
My computers sweats playing this video @ 4K, I can't imagine actually playing the game.
Upgrade your system bro. Prices are much lower now. A good processor is like 300 dollars.
You ar good bru❤
0:42 "close to realizm" for sure. Stones floating in the air at the shore 🤣
Great job at looking for imperfections, look at the overall quality and how gorgeous it is man. Sheesh :x)
@@theyoungmessiah420 oh I'm so sorry. Did I hurt your little feelings?
@@joeking5215 not at all sir. just saying!
0:53 There's the Wierd effect and arthur hand that removes shadows, what kind of reshade did you use?
Realism has little to do with resolution only. Too many variables are in play, like lighting, shadows, textures etc. 8K will simply not be sustainable in terms of power consumption of monitors and GPUs. You can have an ultra realistic graphics even on 1080p on a smaller screen, provided that the aforementioned traits are covered.
8K's gonna make a lot more sense in VR than with conventional screens for sure
This is the most relaxing game ever...
This is what I dreamed about some day as a child playing the 64
The amount of details are impressive
This makes me wonder what gaming will look like in 10 years.
Even in 10 years there wont be much games with that much lvl of detail
@@roughedup cyberpunk 2077 would be finally be able to have the quality to be release as beta that time
Se ve muy realista pero, en sentido grafico estamos llegando al limite, el gran avance en visuales se va a dar cuando busquen formas de hacer el gameplay mas fluido. Por ejemplo creando mejores metodos para hacer mas discreto el pop-in de las texturas o iluminaciones.
Me playing the game on 900p:amazing
I had PONG in 1979, this is belter
Результаты:
Red Dead Redemption 2 в 4K, пресет Ultra- 90 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 4K, пресет Ultra и с DLSS Quality - 95 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 2K, пресет Ultra - 123 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 1080, пресет Ultra - 138 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 8K, пресет Ultra - 31 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 8K, пресет Ultra и с DLSS Performance - 62 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 12K, пресет Ultra - 16 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 12K, пресет Low - 21 fps.
Red Dead Redemption в 16K, пресет Low - 2 fps.
Hi ! You seem to have figured out a way to get rid of the pop-in shadows at the edge of the screen (caused by screen space shadows). Could you tell us how? Thanks ^^
You mean the vignette?
@@geimenberg1718 No, I believe it is unintentionally created by SSAO or something. Especially noticeable on mountains for example, shadows are added on screen while moving the camera around.
@@MoodySelection i think hes saying the vignette effect is hiding it maybe?
@@dumelow89 Oh, I dont think so, I have vignette on too. Unless he tweaked it.
Not a whole lot different visually from the vanilla look. Lights are still just as volumetric, sun still feels hot and the haze of the day still feels real. I'm sure theres plenty going on under the hood but I've been playing it recently and this isnt really a different experience.
quem dera ter um pc igual a esse pra jogar e tentar fazer esses jogos
CPU do cara não chega a 10% kkkkkkkk, foda.
My monitor is only 1440p but.... man is that crisp looking. Beautiful
Guarma in RDR2 gives me an idea of what gta 6 could look like fully rendered out, Obviously GTA 6 Will have way more fidelity as it will come out 8-9 years after this game but crazy how that island and weather just looks absolutely breathtaking
One day we will play on this level on a hand held device.
facts bro crazy too think about back when I was a kid I thought ps2 graphics looked good, tech has evolved
me watching this on 240p blackberry
One of the greatest games of all time, no doubt!
I wonder how many years it will be for games to actually look like this. absolutely beautiful
the actual generation already look like this, just watch horizon forbbide west or ps5 ratchet and clank
I don't think the water waves effects look that good seem to flow a little over the top in cove areas where wave direction flows in at an angle it shouldn't do
but it's so much fun on the Steam Deck at 800p!