7Artisans 'Hope' Cine S35 T2.1 lenses review (35mm, 50mm, 85mm)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 дек 2024

Комментарии • 24

  • @cyrilhamel8289
    @cyrilhamel8289 3 месяца назад +8

    Very well made review with these parallel viewings 👍🏼

  • @nightdonutstudio
    @nightdonutstudio 3 месяца назад +15

    These certainly cover 16:9 full frame circle.

  • @myself3209
    @myself3209 3 месяца назад +1

    My go-to channel for any lens review. High quality contant, chapeau.

  • @lifemate5511
    @lifemate5511 3 месяца назад +2

    Hi there, what's the music called at the end of the video please 🥺

  • @EricRoseBahamas
    @EricRoseBahamas 3 месяца назад +1

    So cool. Waving from The Bahamas.
    P.S.: Do you think there will be an APS-C ultra-wide zoom lens soon as sharp as the Sigma 8-16mm?
    I remember that you gave that one a high recommendation.

  • @MWB_FoolsParadisePictures
    @MWB_FoolsParadisePictures 3 месяца назад +1

    This set looks pretty wonderful...Did you see much LOCA on these, and did the color of that LOCA match decently between the 3 of them? I've always noticed that whatever color LOCA there is in a lens contributes to the over all "color vibe" I perceive from its images.

  • @Franckystudios
    @Franckystudios 27 дней назад

    Hi, thanks for this review. What do you recommended for cheap set of cine lens? I will be using the RED Komodo, my current lenses are from the DSLR ages and Vintage M42 lens, and are not sharp enough to shoot 6K, when I compare them with the new Canon 70-200mm RF Lens, it was night and day when it come to sharpness. I love your works on these review. Thanks.

  • @cbflazaro
    @cbflazaro 3 месяца назад +2

    if you crop your video like 2.35 ratio, they can totally be used full frame

  • @ziadelgheriany3429
    @ziadelgheriany3429 3 месяца назад

    Is this video re-uploaded?

    • @rws531
      @rws531 3 месяца назад +1

      No, he uploaded a review of the shorter 3 lenses from this set and now he’s doing the longer 3 lenses

  • @MelvinDlaCruz
    @MelvinDlaCruz 3 месяца назад +1

    but you unpload this video like a week ago? or I am getting crazy

    • @just_drums_please
      @just_drums_please 3 месяца назад

      Same brand and lens lineup, just different set of focal lengths.

  • @jacquesmertens3369
    @jacquesmertens3369 3 месяца назад +2

    Just wondering ... How can there be focus breathing if you're the one focusing, manually ?

    • @IliasKoureas
      @IliasKoureas 3 месяца назад +5

      Focus breathing has nothing to do with af or mf

    • @MP-dz7vy
      @MP-dz7vy 3 месяца назад +10

      Focus breathing is when the field of view from minimum focus to infinity zooms in, making focus racking less appealing. Focus hunting is when the autofocus system malfunctions and "hunts" for focus.

    • @jacquesmertens3369
      @jacquesmertens3369 3 месяца назад

      @@MP-dz7vy Thanks for the explanation.

  • @kibitz1985
    @kibitz1985 3 месяца назад

    Sigma i-series still better

  • @stefanbadass5357
    @stefanbadass5357 3 месяца назад

    I do wonder how large the market is for these manual, sadly rather ugly, "cine" lenses actually is? Especially the people who watch your channel. Oh well...

    • @amounifnd
      @amounifnd 3 месяца назад +3

      Market is huge if on the right body

    • @stefanbadass5357
      @stefanbadass5357 3 месяца назад +1

      @@amounifnd Not quite than answer to the point I was trying to make......I am certain that the majority of viewers of this channel are principally still photographers, who are tied into a specific "eco system". And more pertinatly these lenses are totally manual, no auto focus, no exif data. Do you really want to go there?? Go on, be honest do you want no automation. You are forking out multiple thousands for automated bodies, and then go back to a totally manual lens system. Seems like hard work to me. Of course YMMV.

    • @Exhaustscavenger
      @Exhaustscavenger 3 месяца назад

      Well you have no choice since all current cameras have AF there are plenty of people find with manual focus especially videographers and astrophotographers where AF is almost useless, landscape with MF also easy, it's a bonus feature for many, bit like video in the first place many don't use it but it's there for those who want it, almost nobody uses ALL features of a camera @@stefanbadass5357

    • @amounifnd
      @amounifnd 3 месяца назад

      @@stefanbadass5357 Yes why not ? I and thousands of others have been shooting manual lenses for decades. One of the things that made Sony APC famous back in the day. Cinema is manual focus, as much as you want to believe it or not. The camera is no way can know what you want to focus on if done automatically. Anyway best you move on. He has reviewed plenty of other lenses on here that will suite your better.

    • @RyanJackson-t9u
      @RyanJackson-t9u 3 месяца назад +1

      @@stefanbadass5357 Christopher's viewers are probably mostly stills photographers yes but I'm sure he's just reviewed these as they are appealing to photographers looking to potentially try their hand at filmmaking and they are appealing due to their budget price. Autofocus lenses are certainly excellent but for certain video work its not always the right choice, especially if you want to use a follow focus and hit repeatable marks; something that's nearly impossible on a fly-by-wire autofocus lens. I do agree that the fonts on the lenses are somewhat quite ugly, but at the end of the day what matters is the final image, not what the rig looks like in the behind the scenes pictures...