Matt Walsh Copes Hard During Debate w/ Giga Stacy Trans Woman
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- 🔴 Website - www.vaush.gg/
💵 Patreon - / vaush
👕 MERCH - merch.whitefor...
😎 SIGN UP TO CANVASS! www.vaush.gg/map
🌟 Other Socials 🌟
⭐️ 2nd Channel - / thevaushpit
👀 3rd Channel? - / @vaushvidya
🐦 Twitter - / vaushv
👾 Twitch - / vaushvidya
📸 Instagram - / vaushv
🔵 Facebook - / vaushvidya
🎵 TikTok - / vaushvidya
🎙Podcast - anchor.fm/vaush
Intro animation credit goes to / itismekyleg & / honeybunnbadger for the visuals, and / sound_sierra for the audio! Thank you!
#vaush #mattwalsh
Conservatives: Being trans goes against basic biology 🤓
Advanced Biology: Allow me to introduce myself 😎
Also conservatives: yeah this dude came back to life
It doesn't even take advanced biology. A basic, _basic_ understanding of actual genetics and epigenetics is enough to understand. They're grade schoolers who time left in the dust, and now they find their tiny little pea brains in an adult body.
lol you white dudes are so close to posting IQ infographics about blacks because "advanced biology"
How does advanced biology mean women do not poses ovaries?
@@Based_Stuhlingersome females are born without ovaries
So when will Mathew stop being a coward and debate a leftist debater, rather than college students with no prep time and the microphone being taken away.
Didn't he debate college professors too?
@@jf5179 If you're talking about the guy in the "what is a woman" documentary, no not really. walsh literally cut off 90% of the interview with the professor because his target audience doesn't like any sort of nuance.
@@jf5179 firstly that was an interview and Mathew had to edit out most of the conversation as well.
Does it matter? It's such an easy topic. People disagreeing with Matt on this one are even dumber than flat earthers. When you're debating the most stupid idiots on the planet, it doesn't matter how "prepared" they are. All their arguments are predictable because just like flat earthers they try to use the same tricks to mislead the uninformed. Like here, see how quickly the other person switched to 'intersex', even though intersex actually confirms the human binary if you understand what it actually is
Never
Matt walsh said that there are anomalies in a binary system. It sounds like he doesn't know what binary means because you can NEVER have anomalies in a BINARY system. Binary means there are ONLY 2 options and nothing else. So either he has to admit that sex is not binary, or that intersex does not exist. It's a lose lose for walsh.
Uhm no, that's literally the definition of an anomaly.
@@jelledesmet7086 How is it abnormal when nature intended it and the intersex population is estimated by doctors to be 1,7%. Intersex is a part of human sex and therefore true binary sex doesn't exist as sex is measured by more than chromosomes, such as bone density which again varies from person to person.
Look, if Ben Shapiro can be a man at the same time as Hasanabi then there's no strict binary sex much less a binary gender system.
@@jelledesmet7086 um no. Binary does not mean two common possibilities and some anomalies. what part of ONLY 2 do you not get?
@@jelledesmet7086 bimodal allows for anomalies, binary does not. Binary is 1’s and 0’s not 1’s, 0’s and sometimes decimals. It’s one or the other babe
@@jelledesmet7086 then... its not binary
"how do we know this person has male genitalia?"
Walsh: "you saw it"
"then I already checked for a miscarriage"
So you would actually have to check if a person with a penis can have a miscarriage… LOL
@@davidmb1595how would you know they have a penis without seeing if they have a penis
@@davidmb1595 how do you know they have a penis?
@@davidmb1595I don’t think you read that right
@@davidmb1595 lots of wind over your head, I see
Conservatives: Liberals can't even define a woman these days.
Ralph Waldo Emerson, Henry David Thoreau, Plato, Diogenes, many other smart guys who founded Western Civilization: Bruh you can't even really define anything when it comes down to it.
conservatives cant even define adult or human or female without resorting to social constructs, which is what they're trying to prevent in the first place.
stupid people cant
That's so confusing.
@@porkerpete7722 Sociology is not simple
Add Rene Decartes to that list too
A patient who appears to have a penis and is complaining of a miscarriage should
1) be assured that care will be delivered and be made comfortable.
2) be examined for symptoms of abdominal pain, swelling, heat, bleeding, &c., and vital signs taken, with notes taken concurrently.
3) be transported to an emergency room for more thorough examination for other anomalous physical or psychological symptoms.
A patient who appears to have a penis and is complaining of a miscarriage may be
1) a biologically normal male who is suffering from a delusion which is causing a panic attack and needs treatment for that.
2) an otherwise normal woman who has an abnormally large clitoris who is indeed having a miscarriage and needs immediate treatment.
3) an hermaphrodite with a penis and also a fully functional uterus who is having a miscarriage and needs immediate treatment.
An EMT is not competent to make a determination of a complaining person's condition and walk away. The correct response is to transport the patient.
Wett Mulch fails.
It can also be a trans man who had surgery to get the penis but kept the uterus, although that may fall under hermaphrodite
@@Jorge-np3tq exactly!
Matt loves taking clips of himself getting owned and posting it on his own channel with no context as a win. Helps when the entire audience are fanboys who clap no matter what.
He's counting on his fans not watching the whole thing, that's why.
He's objectively correct, and the gender cult is objectively incorrect.
Perfect example of I draw a 6, you see a 9.
Conservatives see it as a win, you see it as a loss.
@@jakestech28 Exept that there is no way to see a race, where your guy comes across the line last,.... and call it a win. An objective loss, is still a Loss.
I wouldn't agree this was an object win for the left considering the original video has nearly 30M views and 200k likes
Imagine trying to rationalize with a person that wants you dead.. I’m just a cis het dude but even I can grasp the evil that lies in this man and his beliefs. We can’t forget that Matt Walsh yells about how he believes trans ppl don’t even deserve to exist. Kudos to her, God’s work if there is one.
"Trans people" aren't an ethnicity, You talk about them as if they were a people, akin to basque or irish people.
@@firasjemil213 Cry about it nazi
@@firasjemil213 same principle.
@@firasjemil213 biological genders are "not" a people. Didn't stop societies from pushing women into a different set of rules from men.
When i say i want a cure for schizophrenia, does it mean i think schizophrenic people don't deserve to exist? No, i wish there was an effective and radical cure for schizophrenia, so that no one has to be schizophrenic. Same thing with GD. We want psychologists and doctors to treat these people, not pretend they're something they're not and give them hormones and surgeries that ruin their bodies
*Trans woman:* Graduated with a Bachelor’s of Science, +EMT education & training, licensed medical professional
*Matt Walsh:* Brags about never going to college, says scientists are “full of shit”
he said the scientists she mentioned are full of shit. Also note, she didn't mention names or organisations of the scientists...
@@willingcube5713 She was put on the spot while surrounded by people who hate her. Do the math on stress levels.
@@VelaiciaCreator ok, but that still doesn't change the fact she didn't name these scientists...
@@willingcube5713 Organizations supporting trans healthcare:
American Psychological Association
American Academy of Family Physicians
National Association of Social Workers
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
WPATH
The American Medical Association
Unfortunately Google is suppressing the search and isn't actually showing me what I searched for(lists of organizations), and the google doc that I had access to that listed the much larger list than these mere american ones has gone missing.
I personally couldn't tell you the names of five of my own personal doctors(I move around often enough), so it's not surprising that someone put on the spot would not name drop without prompting. Now, if she were directly asked and faltered, perhaps that would be damning comparatively... but that was not the subject of debate.
As for doctors against trans care, almost all of them have been discredited, and the rest are shunned.
@@willingcube5713 If she didn't name anyone, then why can he say they're full of crap? He doesn't even know who he's dismissing with such confidence.
Judging by the fact Mathew wants to marry teenagers I do have to wonder what he would mean by "adult human female"
I got worried for a second when he said "a woman of childbearing age." Probably took all of his self control to not say 16.
Good ol’ MAP Walsh.
Funniest thing is iirc matt is a libertarian.
Teenagers get married, it's not that big of a deal. 19 is a teenager, in case you're not aware of what numbers are. Leftists are grooming kids as young as 5 for sexual abuse, and you're acting like Walsh is some kind of creep because he doesn't have a problem with 2 consenting 19 year olds getting married. There's seriously something wrong with you people.
@@solaris4022
He's not, otherwise he'd be the worst libertarian to ever exist.
I find Mathew interesting in the fact that he has so much unearned confidence, he is probably the most arrogant human being I have ever seen, which is made so much worse when he knows absolutely nothing on the topics he talks about.
That's most conservatives. Conservative and arrogant are basically synonyms.
Twenty of his followers combined have the intelligence of a shoelace when put together. He doesn't need to know anything about anything, because his mindless drones will just gobble up whatever he spouts.
"I have a high school diploma, which entitles me to say that research biologists are full of shit." - Wett Mulch
Alex i listen to flat earth debates on the regular. Sadly there are far worse...
Walsh is objectively correct about gender ideology.
"A woman is an adult human female"
what's a female?
"A female is a woman"
They're the ones using a circular definition
Nope.
@@justsomeguy6336 lmao very well thought out rebuttal
@@SkepticalJesusOfficial Is that a sentence?
@@justsomeguy6336 Am I your english teacher? I need to explain to you what a sentence is? 😆
@@SkepticalJesusOfficial Sentences that aren’t questions have period marks at the end of them.
If you were an English teacher you’d be pretty bad.
Anyone else saw the Babylon Bee article of Walsh hiding in a bush to ruin Easter? I could 100% believe he hides in bushes watching kids.
he is watching kids to see if there are any trans woman in their bathroom... obviously
I thought Wett Mulch was hiding in a bush because he's an egg.
Like that guy you voted for?
@@MD-zm6sn we really didn't have much of a choice and went for the lesser of the two evils. We don't like Joe Mama but we had to vote for him cuz there wasn't a better option
@@MD-zm6sn I mean I didn't vote for any of them but I'd prefer weird ass Joe over "show me your penis" trump
Gotta respect this woman for having the courage to actually talk to this monster in public while being part of the group he advocates the eradication of
You’re overreacting.
@@justsomeguy6336 Please, leave, are you really commenting on random comments just to say stuff like this? That's pathetic
@Joe Mama its my sunday night and i get to pick what i do with it
Considering the gender cult is shooting up schools now, I don't think they're the ones that should be worried about being "eradicated".
@@markzuckergecko621
Show where trans have any genetic predisposition for mass shootings?
From the statistics I have looked at, they are about 7 times less likely to commit such acts.
So gas light and demagogue till the cats come home, but you have no citation to show such
A pattern of behaviors…
The "two legs" point was crazy. He was literally, in real time, proving himself wrong and either not knowing or caring. Wild.
ikr????????
One important thing to mention... the reason why Matt Walsh begged her to come back for more questions was because he didn't want that "biology is bullshit" line to be his last words. She intentionally walked off after he said that because she considered that a victory, and Matt Walsh realized this.
thats always important in a debate, is to know when its over. hindsight is always 20/20, so coming back after the fact turns any win into a loss. combacks are for the shower lol
The ones who claim "biology is bullshit' are usually trans activists.
If I ever got the chance to debate Matt Walsh I’d ask him this…
“What is a mother?”
Because I’m sure the definition he would give would exclude adoptive mothers.
I’m adopted, and one of the insults that people fling at me is “they’re not your real parents”.
When they’re all I’ve ever known. And my parents ARE my parents.
Although they are not my “biological parents”. And so, I wonder if someone like Matt Walsh would tell ME if I’m delusional. I wonder if someone like Matt would tell ME that my parents are not my parents because it’s not a biological reality.
I imagine he wouldn’t because that would be pretty cruel.
But if he did, it would highlight something quite significant. The Fact that there is a distinction between Biological categories and Social categories.
Something that Matt Walsh could not deny without making himself look like a total a hole.
My mother wasn’t my Mum.
But my Mum wasn’t my Mother.
But my Mum is my Mum. No matter what. And that’s my reality. Because being a Mum is a social role, not a biological one.
Every argument he could make against Trans people, calling them delusional for not adhering to “basic biological reality” etc etc, could likely be flung at adopted kids and families. And it would prove a similar point… and force Matt to recognise the distinction between Biology and Social categories.
I’d like to see him try
I’ve heard so many trash arguments from pro trans people but this is actually a very interesting argument.
I guess one would have to concede that in this instance we do use a biological term in social context but this is a rather ineffectual decision for our society and it’s a personal way families of adopted parents refer to each other. On the other hand a sex distinction is more than semantic it has a purpose and many people seek to maintain it.
@@fifiadan how. how is it any more “legit” I guess than parents, mother, or father?
I'd just ask him what the fuck is a human being. Then just watch him squirm.
@@fifiadan Yeah. Uh. How the fuck does that make someone a legit parent? What the hell makes a person a "legit" human being for that matter?
@@fifiadan I feel like if anything, parentage has way more significance than gender in modern society. Aside from maybe some medical stuff, there really isn't any lawful expectations on you for being man or woman or whatever, at least on paper. For parents on the other hand, there's a ton of legal and ethical stuff attached (who do you live with, who's your emergency contact, parental consent forms, etc.). Building off of that, I couldn't tell you what your value as a man or woman would be, but I could easily tell you what a good or bad parent is like.
"Biological researchers would disagree with you"
_Guy whose education ended with his high school diploma and was never trained as a biologist:_ Then they're full of shit
This is what all people with that education level do. "Teacher told me limited information when I was learning in school, limited information is all I will accept!"
@@alexisglaab2572 plenty of them do in fact. I've seen plenty of programs researchers and most of them have some skin in the game so it's hard for me to see them as objective
@@franciscopalacios4638 unlike Matt, whose incredibly famous and profitable political platform means he has no skin in this game at all 🤡
@@stefvanroey8191 are you saying we should equate Matt to a serious researcher? Matt is just spewing things to make a buck. Most of the researchers ive read that don't support the trans position don't really have skin in the game other than pure principle
@@franciscopalacios4638 yeah and they get boosted by rightwing media outlets like Deborah Soh or Jordan Peterson. No skin in the game indeed.
I read about a trans woman who discovered that she is actually intersex and has a functioning uterus. She was able to get pregnant through IVF and give birth via Cesarean section.
So according to Walsh, is she a man or a woman? If a woman is someone who can get pregnant, then she must be a woman.
But she was born with a penis and testicles and was assigned male at birth. So which is she?
The truth is, she is an intersex woman. She is a woman because that is her identity, and her sex is somewhere between male and female on the bimodal spectrum that is biological sex.
But of course, Matt Walsh and people like him cannot conceive of such nuance, and they certainly cannot cope with actual facts. But i wonder how he'd react to that and how he would answer the question.
Matt Walsh: That doesn't count.
He would say it’s the exception that proves the rule
Sex is not a spectrum and being intersex doesn't invalidate that fact. Sex is the function to produce one of the 2 large gametes, ova or sperm. Intersex and trans have nothing to do with each other, completely different things. And one is not assigned sex at birth they are observed and identified, that's another fact.
@Orla McManus except that is not how sex is determined, and doctors make a guess at your sex at birth based on the appearance of your genitalia. So yes, sex is assigned.
Gametes are only one of 5 characteristics which determine biological sex.
And you clearly didn't comprehend my comment, because i clearly stated the woman was trans AND intersex, i didn't say they were the same.
@@spooniejusticewarrior I said sex is not a spectrum, it's determined by the production of gametes of which there are only two. And I'm also saying that sex is not assigned at birth. That's two different things, do keep up. Trans people don't have the function of the gametes they identify with, so for example they identify as a man, but have women's gamete, that's what it means to be trans. Sex is not assigned it's determined by various phenotypic traits which correlate with biological sex, and determined with 99.95% accuracy making ot a falsifiable scientific fact, because we know the tiny intersex people ..5% is caused by a genetic fault in uterus. They don't invalidate sex as a binary reality nor invalidate the determination of sex at birth. Assigned at birth is merely inclusive language for trans people, the doctor didn't get it wrong or take a guess, their biology proves that 100%, thus assigned at birth is, not a biological or scientific reality. Hope that helps.
Matt walsh:*coughs*
His audience:🦭🦭🦭
Straight up cult-like behaviour.
“Just because you’re born with only 1 leg, no legs, or extra legs doesn’t mean you’re not a human being” yeah, and just because I wasn’t born with a vagina or a womb doesn’t make me not a woman! I’m so glad we agree, comrade Walsh!
Walsh is a closeted ally
Why do you think you're a woman? What do you have in common with women? Literally nothing. There is no difference between you and regular men, both biologically and psychologically.
In his argument what would still make you human is the rest of your physical and biological characteristics that are human though. A person may be horribly deformed, but they wouldn't need to tell you that they are human for you to know that they are human. But if they're born without legs at all, have fins and gills, need water to survive, and have no human characteristics, they probably actually are a fish.
No, being born with a vagina means you're a woman, unless you're intersex and also have a penis. That's what words mean. The same as a person with one leg is a person with one leg. This isn't difficult.
@@СергейКочетов-о3л you know, that cladistically, human are actually fish?
"2 isn't a real number, it's just a mathematical anomaly that occurs between the binary of 1 and 3." -Matt Walsh
"Carbon isn't a real element. It's just a rare anomaly that occasionally occurs between hydrogen and helium." - MAP Walsh
@@moviemaestro800 "burger King doesn't exist, it's just a fast food anomaly between McDonald's and Wendy's" -Mac Walsh
@@serabi_ “Swirl doesn’t exist, it’s just a slushee flavor anomaly between blue raspberry and cherry.” - Watt Malsh
"17 doesn't exist. It's just a rare anomaly between optimal breedability and age of consent" - Matthew Walshire
@@moviemaestro800 not even if you look at a periodic table lmao
We need Vaush to debate Walsh. 2023 lets make it happen.
Vaush is an idiot lol all of this philosophical ideology is self-interpretation. Matt Walsh is literally spitting facts. Simplicity.. how dumb is Vaush and every one of you.
Here's how Vaush could do it. It'd be ethically questionable, but if Vaush started insulting Matt's wife he would get viscerally angry and could be provoked into a confrontation. And it's not like shes completely off limits, she did appear in his documentary and cosigns his bullshit
@Sully absolutely. He has Shapiro disease, will never go up against anyone but college students who aren't necessarily prepared.
V vs W
he already did a debate on the subject with bogardus. It went bad for him
17:15 Matt Walsh the type of dude to believe a plucked chicken is a human 💀
Matt Walsh being schooled by Diogenes the cynic! Nice.😂
@@DinosaurianDude Precisely! I’m glad people got that 😄
Behold
@@LANSl0t I’ve brought you a man
to be fair, matt is nearly indistinguishable from one
I think the saddest thing is that there are women in that audience that applaud Watt Malsh after he basically reduced their existence to that of breeding stock.
And you reduce their existence to nothing but self ID. Don’t try to make pro women arguments when the overwhelming majority of women disagree with you.
So many women have no self respect. If they did they would have voted in their self interest and Hillary would have won in a landslide in 2016.
I'm highly offended by this statement and would like you to retract it. After all, breeding stock has value /s
Like Vaush said, people like MAP Walsh and Michael Knowles won't debate him. They know he will dominate the discussion and embarrass them like the bottoms they are.
No it’s because Vaush just prevaricates all the time.
“In Mexico water is aqua.”
@Jay nah don't lump these bozos with us Charli is an ally.
Conservatives: "We should look to science for the answers."
Scientists: "It would appear gender is not a binary. Things are complicated"
Conservatives: "Ah so they are all lying and paid off and and-"
Ah yes! The ever so abstract "scientists" XD Pedigree over arguments as always!
Biology still says that your either a male or female lol. Sometimes things like intersex happens (extremely rare), but even in those cases a person is still predominantly male or female.
@@Stonecoldfrank Yup cause Im not making an argument. Im just mocking lol
@@coldshock5181
"X - Roughly 1 in 2,000 to 1 in 5,000 people (Turner’s )
XX - Most common form of female
XXY - Roughly 1 in 500 to 1 in 1,000 people (Klinefelter)
XY - Most common form of male
XYY - Roughly 1 out of 1,000 people
XXXY - Roughly 1 in 18,000 to 1 in 50,000 births"
that doesn't seem very rare to me.
a lot of people live their lives not knowing they're intersex, btw.
"One study in Great Britain showed that 97 out of 100 people who were XYY had no idea. They thought they were a traditional male and had few signs otherwise."
@@Kligor2 Don't worry we're also mocking you, and also we know deep inside we are not insane, especially when admitting biological differences in sport performances, unlike people on your side :)
An anomaly within a binary option, would imply there is no binary right?
Correct. If you introduce an exception to a binary the binary becomes a bimodality.
A computer which has more than a binary current won't function.
Correct
Exactly. If there was a single 2 among all the trillions of 0s and 1s of binary code ever written it wouldn't be binary anymore.
Yes. Biology is not a perfect system. But because of that you have to make generalities.
Leftists can’t understand that distinction.
Matt doesn't get to make a "no doctor would" argument after claiming that all of those doctors are full of shit. Do you or do you not trust doctors' opinion, Mathew?
Conservatives love science and medicine when it agrees with them. Which is usually why they cite things from the 60s and before
he said all of the scientists who the trans person claimed to have as her back up were full of shit. Very different to saying all doctors are full of shit.
@@willingcube5713 Ah, so the respected and experienced majority of the medical world is full of shit... nice.
He does not unless it fits his agenda. Simple.
Matt: How do you define woman?
Human: That depends on whether you want to have a true definition that matches reality, a useful definition for purposes of communication, or if you want a definition simplistic enough that a republican like you can understand it.
@@style_muse my aunt wasn't born with an overly or uterus so I guess she's not a woman
I was scared for her. The audience behind her seemed so evil and hateful. She was very brave.
Seriously, talk about being in a room full of psychotic maniacs.
They'd all been drinking free Bud Light 🍺🍺🍺 as they can't sell that 💩 anymore 😩
Lmao nah he wasnt at a leftie rally. right wingers know to behave
@@eriksvensson6054 LOL, sure bud.
@@eriksvensson6054 tell that to the capitol insurrectionists
10:03 Straight-up science denial. Classic Matt Walsh.
Nah, hes stating a point. The fact we’re even discussing these things is because scientists who were given these qualifiactions should reprehended immediately .. theyre pushing for their own agendas now zzz
that will probably his next documentary: "what is science?"
“Why don’t you back it up with a source?”
“My source is that I made it the fuck up”
No, he's right, even in the gender studies domain. Activist claims there are many genders , but there are still only two sexes.
The cold disgust and hatred in her eyes are kind of haunting, that's a very strong and level-headed woman. No wonder Woulsh looks so nervous
she's a brave woman.
@@lordhallibel3604 yeah Matt Walsh isn’t very brave.
@@lordhallibel3604
You're right, Matt Walsh is a coward
Shes a darn warrior
@@RobynReanimates nope, just your kind
@@Ynwell_theslaaneshi brave is subjective, and hes more brave than you sjw cult members
Just ask them to define female. They will then have them ask if the exceptions (easy to list) still fit the labels of "man" and "woman." Then ask why.
Or define adult. We all know Walsh has some interesting thoughts on that subject...
@@jameskilgour387 Or human! I'm willing to bet he likes the definition of human for some folks in the constitution or 1930s Germany.
Male or female just means biology I suppose we call people who undergo surgery that make them similar or the same as people born that gender to differ between those who were born that way vs surgery. Most people don’t think of psychology when they use male or female that’s why the average person doesn’t take these convos seriously. You’d be better off just saying you think people should use the pronouns someone prefers bc it helps with depression/sui. My response to this is I think it passes a threshold of ridiculousness that I’m willing to accept, especially when it’s counterproductive to normalizing gender abolishment
@@KurokamiNajimi pronouns aren't biological. Why should someone have to identify their sex?
@@KurokamiNajimi well that reaches certain people, but not others.
However...
If Walsh equates sex to chromosomes, he has to explain why he insists on a binary when more than two karyotypes exist. (Functionality doesn't matter Peterson spammers..., It's a philosophy question)
Gonads and gametes? If you lose those gonads and no longer produce those gametes, has your gender changed? Why or why not?
The "it's a genetic Anomaly, it doesn't matter" is a cop out because to continue elaborating on that would basically cause him to self-own super hard.
It's hilarious that there's thunderous applause any time someone says the word 'female'. Like wow congratulations you said the word, very brave!
It's not even a fucking answer. 'Female' is so broad and indescriptive a term, he's basically dodging the question.
Democrats: We are the party for uplifting women!!!
Also democrats: We will let men compete in woman's competitions so we can just uplift men instead
@@coldshock5181 Wow you were so proud of that one that you decided to post it even though it has absolutely nothing to do with the comment you were responding to.
@@coldshock5181 damn, how long were you cooking that one up for?
@@thatoneguy-7387 It's why they are clapping lol, because people actually need to be reminded of what a female is these days
im in love she has more courage in these minutes then i ever will in a life time .
Lmao he made himself look stupid. He thought he came correct.
Matt Walsh: (reductive question/statement)
Everyone else: that doesn’t account for X and Y
Matt: “I should be able to state something simply because otherwise it’s fake.”
Everyone else: “experts disagree”
Matt: “they’re morons.”
🤨
what a fucking legend to go in such a pit of hogs and take them to fucking school
💯
That trans women got schooled and left dejected. It was kinda sad to watch
@@apoc5000 Keep huffing that sweet sweet copium.
@@page8301 this comment section is full of copium dealing with this loss against matt Walsh. Everyone hoping vaush can come up with good counter arguments but....to no avail
@@apoc5000Man you really like huffing that hyper copium I see.
Vaush: Women are the default.
Does that mean transwomen are just trying to restore to factory settings..? 😉
Does that also mean men don’t exists and sexual reproduction is pot luck?
I was on board for gender being fluid but sexual reproduction and male and female biological functions
Are not fluid.
So when trans want to redefine obvious distinct characteristics, it only makes them seem dishonest.
Yes lol
Props to her for being brave enough to do this and holding frame.
He got destroyed. Like every trans that try to convince people with brains that they are the opposite
What I really love about this interaction is how obviously angry Matt gets at the end of this conversation while the woman completely stone faces him and remains calm. It's brilliant.
I think ppl need to start flipping the script on them and ask, "What makes you a man?" Let him ramble then say, "I've seen you without a beard. If you couldn't grow a beard. What makes you a man?" "Why are you wearing a suit instead of a dress?" You could do that forever.
I think she did great by bringing up the fact the scientific concensus overwhelmingly disagrees with them. After his dumb retort she should have said. "Sorry Matt, facts don't care about your feelings. But you know who did agree with you? the Nazis."
(Correctly) associating their beliefs to the Nazis is a pretty powerful rhetorical tactic. It's not dishonest either, it's accurate
I agree except for the Nazi bit. Even accurately comparing them shuts down their brains.
How do manage to turn everything into Nazi vs communist I'm average the 20th century is over guys
@@kstar1489 That's why you have to follow with the story of Magnus Hirschfeld. A major researcher in Trans studies in 1930s Germany. Who was killed for it by the Nazis.
a man is an adult human male. Basically xy chromosomes and some other stuff such as testes and producing sperm etc. That is what a male is.
@@willingcube5713 You might want to double-check both those ideas. People with XY chromosomes can develop completely "female" bodies simply because a hormone receptor isn't working.
So what are you supposed to do with this person? Graft a penis onto them? It would "match their sex", wouldn't it?
the audience murmuring in confusion when she makes a good point while they wait for overlord walshie to say something stupid to clap and bark at like seals is my favorite part of this
They don’t care about facts, they care about confidence and aggression. Their confusion was over hearing it from their opponents for a change.
what good points did she make?
@Autumn Jacaranda they don't care about those things either, they just care about their ideology.
Actually, what points did she make?
Vaush paused the video every time they spoke up.
Using the definition "a woman is an adult female" as an argument is a fallacy. Ironically, its the same fallacy that Matt pointed out in his propaganda hit piece. Its called a circular argument.
EDIT: Women and female are two separate terms. A woman is a person with qualities *traditionally associated* with females. Simply put it is a gender expression that is associated with females, not exclusive. Males can also express traits that are associated with femininity. This means that a male could also be a woman, hence Transwoman.
The definition "a woman is an adult female" is not incorrect as a definition. An adult female is indeed a woman. But it is not an argument for exclusivity. Intersex women and transwomen are also women.
No, that's..... The definition of a woman. I know it's tough when reality conflicts with your cult, but you should just deal with it, because reality doesn't care what you think.
No that's wrong, a woman can't be defined as a woman cus THAT'S a circular defenition, but an adult human female is using the word woman, because a woman is an ADULT human female, and a girl is a adolescent human female. Not circular, cus I you say, well what is an adult human female, you don't say woman, you say a human over 18 who has biological female characteristics
@@markzuckergecko621 thank u!
@@markzuckergecko621 If Matt is using the term women and female to mean the same thing … then he is essentially saying a female is an adult human female … which he is using the word within his definition and just adding evaluative terms like “adult” which is a social construct.
@@markzuckergecko621 then define female, preferably without using the word female, feminine or woman.
She's incredibly brave for doing this. Much respect to her 🙏
Kept waiting to see the 'her.' Guess you must mean that boy with lipstick and no brain!
Honestly I bet she was shot with nerves the entire time but it speaks to her strength of character that she didn’t let it show
@@basiliskboy17 I watched the whole thing and never saw a woman speak. Saw some laughing...
Took a lot of guts, she's amazing! And the little weasels and the self proclaimed fascist are VILE as usual
@@Abulb99 Yep, if I were Matt I would die of shame for getting mollywhopped in a discussion with my sworn enemy, a woman, lol.
Good thing he has his braindead fanboys to back him up everytime he speaks.
That's my good friend and I'm very proud of her. I would not be able to stand up there myself and not be big mad.
Heaps of people are proud of her, I hope she's doing okay, that was a horrid environment for her but lordy she did amazing
*he
If he is your true friend, quit trying to confuse him with your wicked fantasy
@@thorrrr1962 nah friends tend to be supportive and nice to eachother. Something you would know if you had any.
@@thorrrr1962 wicked fantasy? My wicked fantasy would involve demons flying down and carrying Matt Walsh away back to hell where he came from.
@Stef Van Roey real friends tell you how it is. Your friends egg you on to do stupid things. But, of course, what is to expect from a dude like you that thinks men can give birth.
11:11 the way Mathew leaning on the podium makes him look so submissive.
Agreed. He looks like such a beta.
The pause at 2:14 does not contradict these remarks.
@Alex-cw3rz Submissive and breedable you mean
Walsh so sad lmao
Epitome of that crying wojak with the :^) mask
Love that Matt's leg argument really just works against him. Yes, when someone is born with only one leg, it's because something went "wrong". However. We don't turn around and look at that person, and say
"no, you're only pretending you have one leg. You're a human, and humans have two legs, so you're just pretending."
"You have medical professionals affirming that you only have one leg? Well, fine, it's clear then that the solution is to just grow another leg. You're supposed to have two, you only have one, so just decide to not have only one."
"Yes, people do exist who have one leg, but that's a disability, it shouldn't be supported! They should go to physical therapy so they can be taught to grow a new leg."
"Medical care? You mean like a prosthetic leg? Or a surgery to relieve nerve pain? That's ludicrous, they shouldn't be allowed medical care that will help them maneuver their disability. They should just manage life without committing to a change like that, it's expensive and unnatural. Next they'll go after the kids."
"If it were really just about a medical process, why on earth would these people join communities and seek support from others with only one leg, they're clearly just seeking attention and pushing an agenda. These people have something deeply wrong with them, it shouldn't be celebrated when they accept that they can still love themselves, or when they're granted medical care to help them manuver in this world that wasn't designed for them. They should be shunned, denied medical care, discriminated against, and forced to fit into the idea of a human I have in my narrow minded world view."
Technically, Trans people have something "wrong" with them in the sense that their gender identity doesn't match their physical body or the gender norms associated with their physical body. If everything was as it should be, there would be no need for medical or social transition. But that's why we should be affirming and validating that struggle, offering medical care when they need it, encouraging and uplifting trans communities and voices, and not shunning or ridiculing trans people, in the same way that it would be unacceptable to act that way towards someone with a physical disability.
Or "Oh, you have just one leg? Nah that can't be because you're a human. Humans have two legs and can walk, so go and work on that construction site or anywhere else like a normal human, stop wasting governments money."
women clapping at a man openly admitting that all he sees humans as is walking, talking reproductive capabilities, is really wild. being reduced to incubators right before their very eyes, being reduced to a womb whose nature is to be pregnant, gives them zero pause. really sad.
@@style_muse no, they call pregnant people pregnant people and menstruators menstruators, when the topics are pregnancy and menstruation. In those situations, they're not reducing someone's entire being down to one characteristic, unlike what Walsh and other conservative commentators do with women.
Well, the womb is the reason yours all "deep" personalities exist at all. So yeah, being "incubator" is more important and honorable then being a "free spirited" mentally ill castrate.
@@fjbi4567 you sound like you missed out on one of those “deep personalities”.
@@outercat and you sound like you've got nothing to say but still want to have a last word
@@fjbi4567 ah yes, projection.
I love Matt's "gotcha" question about the miscarriage. He has no idea there are in fact people out there in the world with both a penis and a uterus. Not that I'd expect him to, as earlier on he and all his minions agreed that the peak of medical literature starts and ends in middle school health class. "Facts don't care about your feelings" is a mantra that can be applied right back at them, and no amount of shit-throwing and temper tantrums are going to morph the rules of biology into a rigid binary.
I would have loved to see her ask him, "between the 2 of us, who is more of a man". Either he bites the bullet and say they are equally as manly which his base would take issue with, or he would say that he is more manly which proves her point that gender is on a spectrum.
The problem with your question is that your intended idea of manliness is based on stereotype. No matter how you deny your masculinity/femininity (or reality, as Matt often put it), a man is still a man and a woman is still a woman. The 'manliness' question is irrelevant to the debate. Stereotypes don't make you a man, biology does. (Proceeds to debate on legitimacy of 'advanced biology', gender dimorphism, and so on)
This can work as a trap question, but if Matt sees through it, you're f***ed.
Here's my argument against the whole genetic abnormality when it comes to intersex. Red hair is a seperate hair color, yet it is also a genetic abnormality as common as intersex. Intersex is a seperate sex.
Same with ginger hair and there are more intersex people than ginger people.
I am intersex. We exist. Just because we are an outlier doesnt mean we dont deserve recognition.. yknow?
Not saying you'rr saying thr opposite.
It's not, intersex exist within the male/female binary, it confirms the human binary. Every intersex person is either male or female. That is what we have come to learn, that male isn't just XY and female isn't just XX. Male can also be XXY, XYY, even XX can also be male (literally called XX male syndrome). Woman isn't just XXX, but can also be XO XXX, and yes, even XY can be female (you guessed it, XY female syndrome or swyer). We can even go extremer, like XXY female. XXY is normally a male syndrome, klinefelter syndrome. But if the SRY gene (which steers male development), which is normally present on the Y chromosome, isn't present or doesn't function, you get an XXY female, which for all intents and purposes develops the same as a regular XX female, because the additional Y doesn't do anything.
What role does intersex play in reproduction?
@@BamBamGT1 maybe sex is more complicated than over analyzing chromosomes
Watching conservative debate panels is like watching the Supa Hot Fire Rap battle parody.
What a perfect comparison! Well done!
*pulls the worst application of rhetoric imaginable*
*audience applauds en masse*
😂😂😂😂😂
Debating Matt on the topics of gender and biology is like trying to play chess with a pigeon - it knocks the pieces over, craps on the board, and flies back to its flock to claim victory.
She’s so brave. I’d love to know more about her, if you can have her on stream for a friendly chitchat and debate review about this moment with her I’d definitely tune in.
I'd be shook for sure.
If I had a way to contact her, I would definitely gongratulate her for her bravery, I couldn't have done that
I could feel the anger coming through the screen. As a trans person, I don't know what was more annoying, Matt or the seal filled room. I swear to God, if I was in her place, I would've called the whole room brainless coc*k suckers or something. "WOOO MATT GET EM! GET EM!" They're screeching like it's a fuc*king soccer game, but then they go and make your life living hell. The whole thing is reta*rded.
A man pretending to be a woman isn't brave, standing up against the leftist cult even after you started murdering kids is bravery.
She's amazing here, I don't see much of a point in lowering herself into the Vaush pit however.
Seriously, his best argument is "Maybe all the evidence and people trained to understand this subject disagree with me, but that's because all of them are dumb and I'm a real big brain smarty so my opinion based on literally nothing but my own personal experience is definitely more right than them."
Matt is too lazy to read all those studies because it would reveal that he is wrong and not the Brainy God King that he think he is and he doesn't want to do the work to pick up those shattered pieces and decide which ones to put there. He is secretly lazy and overtly egotistical.
what evidence?
@@Remedy462 He's beyond lazy and arrogant. He's a facist. Walsh's world view will fall apart if he ever admitted trans women and men can live and function the same as cis people with few exceptions (which medical science aim to alleviate). Because if a man can become/be a woman then there're no predestined roles for each genders, there's no god and there's no Eve nor Adam. He's too weak a man to handle his dark thoughts without a god who'll lead, punish and reward him.
I have little doubt that Ms. Walsh will one day, in the not too distant future get caught in an unsavory act, most likely with a young man. His obsessive, single-mindedness regarding this issue is a serious red flag.
Matt Walsh actually falling into the "Featherless biped" trap, jesus fucking christ.
Kudos to this woman for going into a literal viper's nest and standing her ground. The community needs more like her.
*he
@@bobbun4369 She. Her. Congrats to her for standing up to people like you who think a group of humans should be eradicated.
@@thorrrr1962 She's definitely a woman
Like, she's visibly a woman
Walsh could say anything and his fans will still clap like seals.
There were people defending him on his slavery take under the h3h3 video it was pathetic
Same with Vaush.
@@justsomeguy6336 the difference is matt is wrong 95 percent of the time and vaush is right 80 percent
@@dillpickle5616 the (just some guy) is a bot account. All of his comments are just saying vaush is bad and anytime a person tries to challenge him he never replies, or just keep saying vaushs is bad.
@@dillpickle5616 source?
This is the live version of “The Card Says Moops.”
Glad that title is seemingly catching on, to describe playing linguistic obtuseness/irony games for the sake of appearing dominant in an argument. I'll admit, it's a little fun to use at times, but it is certainly annoying to be on the receiving end of it almost every time you notice its use.
I would love it if in one of these types of interviews the woman ended with "btw, I'm cis, not trans" and it would blow the transphobe's mind
how would that blow anyone's mind?
@@jme1mm Because transphobes love to say "I can tell that you're trans, therefore you're mentally ill and completely wrong and only trans people would defend the trans agenda"
So telling them you're not actually trans and they are literally wrong about something would blow their minds.
He would see a delusional women
And it's not a sis women but a WOMAN
@@back-to-new You do realize when you say "i'm not a cis woman, i'm a WOMAN" is the same as saying "I'm not a straight woman, I'm a WOMAN", or "I'm not a white woman, I'm a WOMAN"?
People who refuse to use words that define them and basically say "I'm not a minority, I'm normal" are pretty gross. Please learn how language works so you don't come across as bigoted. Unless that is your intention in which case please think about yourself.
This woman is a queen
I think you need mental health.
@@thorrrr1962 everyone has mental health.
@@moncapitaine550 esp men thinking they are women. And vice versa.
"What is a woman"
*brings out the chicken*
Like chickens and roosters
*storms stage with featherless biped in thigh highs*
BEHOLD, A WOMAN!
Funny you cover this, because last night I had a dream where I debated Matt Walsh in front of a huge crowd and won. It was so bad I pretty much ended his career. After, he pinned me to the wall backstage out of anger and I knocked him down, called him a nauseatingly pathetic excuse of a man and he ran away crying.
My dreams are never that coherent.
Who is this woman? We must find her and support her for this public display of bravery!
Yeah. I would like to know her and explain her molecular genetics in case she will need to defend again much better. I am sad it ended this way. She would have a big chance to smash MW knowing what I know.
Every human in this video that talks is a man. Which woman are you talking about?
@@Fox064 She definitely didn't know the douchebaggery she was wading into, but she gave it a good shot.
@@rightwerk I thought men didn’t have boobs, long hair and makeup?
@@andreja9425 I don’t know who said that. Men can certainly have those things.
"They're full of shit, the ones who would say that."--Matt Walsh speaking of THE VAST MAJORITY OF BIOLOGISTS!!!
By the way, when Matt Walsh brought up the hypothetical "miscarriage" question, did he realize that he used the singular they?
So if a person was born without legs, and they went to a doctor for help, the doctor say "You were born with the body you have. Stop trying to be something you're not."
That's literally their argument.
@@peopleofearth6250 whats the alternative?
Ohh shit that's literally their argument 😂😂😂😂.
@@willingcube5713 F*cking prosthetic? The end point of transphobia/conservatism is anti-science, medicine aka ultimately anti human.
All it boils down to is:
No, they won't let you make your finite time on earth better bc their sky daddy told them so. And how dare you live and be another way then them.
@@willingcube5713 are you fucking serious?
So after the recent news came out about Walsh it was all projection when he was claiming others were gr o0mers
Recent, how recent? What'd he do now?
What news?
Commenting so I can come back once someone says what he did
Interested in this news
I'm being gaslighted on this it seems
I find it funny how all of Matt’s arguments can literally be used against him
please explain
@@willingcube5713 Watch the video. Vaush explains.
@@smaakjeks or you could just tell me a couple of the points.
@@willingcube5713 Matt: We define humans as having 2 legs. But we still recognise people as human even if they have just 1 leg.
Here he contradicts his own definition of human in order to accept exceptions as human.
Progressives do the same with trans-women as being women.
@@willingcube5713 Literally his example about human legs can be used to point out how trans people are valid.
Lol Walsh & his audience is literally like the "electrolytes got what plants crave"-conversation in Idiocracy
It’s amazing how less someone knows about the subject the more confident they are in the little information they possess. That audience is full of people who haven’t done five minute of research who are smirking and rolling their eyes and are so thirsty to shout their opinions. Can they not just stfu and listen to the conversation?
That's the Dunning-Kruger Effect in action
“Everything complicated is not worth knowing” Matt Walsh
"Basic biology!"
Biologists: "Actually this subject is more complicated than you're making it."
"You're full of shit."
You've already lost
Matt walsh loves biology and science unless it goes against his arguments, after that his feelings are more important than facts
I don't understand why people would bother interacting with this dude in situations like this. You're just going to get clipped out of context, talked over, and probably harassed before, during, and after the event.
And quite possibly assaulted by some member of the audience upon walking out.
It takes a lot of balls yeah, to be able to walk into the Lions Den like that. I however still think it should happen, as it demonstrates a lot of courage and shows that not all of us are willing to succumb to fear tactics.
There is no context that leftist cult members don't look completely insane to regular people.
@@pancakes8670 it is absolutely a power move, walking into the Lion's Den like that.
You have to remember that this is a college campus. These are kids emotionally speaking out. She held herself well but the thing that drove her to speak out in the first place was emotion.
Would be awesome to see Vaush to put Walsh in his place.
Vaush has logic and reason 👍
You mean in a fucking coffin, right? Deep, deep under the ground?
@@KoewlBag God, that would be so nice.
I got my masters in physiology in predominantly conservative area. One of my peers held very conservative beliefs. We we learned about androgen insensitivity, he and I had a very long conversation about sex and gender. He said, “I guess sometimes it really is just better to let someone tell you what they are.”
Walsh: "I trust biology."
Stacy starts explaining biology.
Walsh: "Wait, not like that -"
It's funny how they always circle back to how definitions are often generalized and hope the person they're debating doesn't notice lol
so what is a woman?
@@willingcube5713 Some one who fits the social role for people born female.
@@karolsmith6754 so a trans woman is not a female according to you? So that's the argument over. You admit a trans woman is not a female.
Dismissing intersex people as a "genetic anomaly" is pretty much akin to argueing that orange is not a human hair color since there are more intersex people than redheads in the world.
Same people who want simple answers are the same ones who can’t differentiate between their, they’re, and there
Real
True but is *female* an ambiguous term or a definitive one?
@@uncomfortabletruth3831 Define female, then define woman, and we'll get back to you.
But until you stop bullshitting and playing dumb there's no point pretending you're here in good faith.
@@uncomfortabletruth3831 female is a general category with ascribed to certain biological attributes. So yes it is somewhat ambiguous.
@@kstar1489 so male and female aren’t definitive sexual characteristics, based on sexual reproduction?
I guess I better tell my college science teacher, he doesn’t know squat about reproduction.
I honestly believe there is no arguing with the right. A right winger and a leftie are playing fundamentally different games. A left winger, on average, cares about facts, logical consistency, sound reasoning, making a case in an argument.
The right winger cares only about posturing and projecting power in an argument.
This I picked up from Innuendo studios, and since then, every one of these frustrating debates starts making so much sense. The frustration of "why aren't they engaging with the arguments" - they were never going to, they're here to do something else.
How can you claim to care about fact when your side believes men can become women?
@@jme1mm See, there is no care for nuance or argumentation with the right. This guy will just keep posturing with one liners and zingers, with the last thing on his mind to actually engage with the argument and defend his position.
Innuendo studios "Never play defense"
@@dawnkeyy But seriously the claim that men can become women is completely indefensible.
The reason I am using one-liners and zingers such as "What is a woman" is because I believe that your worldview is so weak and fragile that even a simple question like that threatens it at its very foundation.
From what little I've seen of Innuendo Studios it seems to me that he fundamentally does not understand the motivations of conservatively minded people so he sees all right-wing thinking as fascist and authoritarian.
@@jme1mm I'm assuming that you're talking purely about biological sex.
No, the pro-trans side never, and I mean NEVER, believed that people with XY chromosomes can change to XX, or that people with testicles can transform them into ovaries. They DO believe stuff like "people with breasts can get a surgical reduction" but that one is true.
”Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”
-Jean-Paul Sartre
She has more courage than the troops, especially considering the kind of audience Matt Walsh cultivates.
Wait, his proof of a sex binary is that some people can get pregnant and others can't, but even THE ABILITY TO GET PREGNANT is a spectrum in multiple directions FOR THE SAME PERSON *OVER A SINGLE LIFETIME*, MATT.
Also saying they can just go to the Doctor to fix it is not always true either.
Getting pregnant is a spectrum?
How so?
@@uncomfortabletruth3831 trying for a baby isn't a 100% chance or 0% chance depending on fertility, it's chance based even for people capable of getting pregnant.
Also you have 920 comments on this channel you are sad
@@daaaaaaanny
Go back to elementary school..
spectrum is a condition that is not limited to a specific set of values but can vary, without gaps, across a continuum.
Now tell me again how it can be defined as a spectrum, instead of a definitive binary function?
@@uncomfortabletruth3831 ...yes? If a woman tries for a baby, if she isn't infertile the chances she gets pregnant isn't 100%. There's a chance for perfectly fertile women to unsuccessfully get pregnant, it's not a black and white "you're infertile or you're not" situation
Adding on Vaush's comments on "Hating the concept of Souls" and I agree. Although even as an anti-theist i love using religious characters and concepts in the stories i am writing, using things about like Souls disturbs me, because like many religioys concepts, its inherently abusive. The idea of a soul implies that the life you have on Earth isnt precious, because you will just "go somewhere else" once dead. Its also a great excuse for Cult Leaders using Abrahamic Faiths to abuse their followers and say "Dont worry, your soul will live better thanks to your submission to me!"
it what turns me off from even considering these concepts in a fictional story.
Very much enjoyed reading this 🙂
I completely agree with you. Christians and Islamic extremists cannot wait to die. Christians believe the rapture will happen any day (and they've been saying this for centuries), so they don't think there's any point of combating climate change. They think unstable weather is a sign of the Rapture. The belief in a soul is just a massive cope to our finite existence
@@CambrianAnomalocaris this was interesting to read. I get your point about the existence of souls not necessarily leading to negative outcomes or world views, but unfortunately the overwhelming cultural impact of that belief has been harmful
@@freedomofmusic2112I do think that the concept is easily susceptible to being exploited for abusive ends; I am denying that the concept is inherently abusive.
I think the negative outcomes are not due to the concept of souls themselves but putting them in the context of an afterlife with some sort of punishment/reward system etc.
souls can also go along with reincarnation, your time on earth is still precious and important because it may determine who you will be next.
Matt Walsh: *Thought Terminating Cliche/Essentialist Statement*
Audience of Suckers: *applause*
I'd correct that statement about the audience and just label them as "unwitting fascists".
love how matt walsh asks the stupidest most ignorant questions and then is like "hehe, libtard owned" when they're speechless that he just asked the most hypothetical outlandish question
Conservatives: women are people who can or have gotten pregnant
Me: (ciswoman, never been pregnant, got my tubes removed) so... I'm not a woman? Ok...cool.
“We’ve acknowledged that there are some people who can get pregnant and some people who can’t.”
Yes. The problem is he’s refusing to understand that people who can’t get pregnant is a very broad group of people.
Noticed that Mathew wears a lot of makeup just like his beard covering up his non-existent chin, it's due to him being very insecure about his looks and lack of masculinity.
nothing wrong with makeup for men
@@felicityc funny you chuds keep telling us only women wear make up. Which one is it?
But for real though MAD respect to her for going into the Lions Den and keeping it so calm and chill and not buying into their petty insult arguments.
Nah, there's no respect in allowing yourself to get dog walked by this clown.
@@tafatapaleao4588 It’s her and transwomen are women. You can’t do anything about it, just like how your grandfather tried to stop civil rights you’re following in his footsteps of being a loser.
Walsh: "Scientists are full of schit!"
Well, are you going to offer evidence to the contrary? That's how science works.
Evidence for why the scientist are full of crap? I'd love to see his evidence, since he asserts it so confidently
If some thing doesn’t fit within a binary, that makes the thing not a binary lol
It literally does
It does. Take computers. The volt differences are just High and Low, not particular voltage values. But we still work with binary.
in order for biological sex to not be binary you would need a third (fourth fifth and so on) reproductive role.
what reproduce role is there outside of male and female?
@@4cymusic785 Life and computers are different matters entirely. Life has no binary.
@@Quiestre The binary you're talking about is reproductive roles. Not everyone has one. What do you call those people?
For Walsh "if this person said they were having a miscarriage" argument, I would say "I would find it extremely unlikely, just as I would if I knew that a biological female who had her ovaries taken out thought she was having a miscarriage"
This is so incredibly frustrating to watch Matt Walsh completely not understand biology as a phd in genetics.
He understands it perfectly. There are only 2 categories, male and female. A male cannot become a female and a female cannot become a male. Period. This is kindergarten basic bioligy.
genocide is the only logical end to his rhetoric, if you believe that trans women and women who cant get pregnant are broken, then the only thing they can think of doing is "fixing" them.
I would pay cold hard cash to see Vaush debate Walsh. I'd pay good, good money to see it. Vaush would just drag Walsh through the mud with solid facts and data.
Walsh will never have the courage to debate Vaush though. It'll never happen. Lol
"There are only male and female."
"What about the exceptions?"
"Those don't count because they're exceptions."
"Why don't you count the exceptions?"
WHat exceptions?
@@willingcube5713 intersex people. It’s rare but you can be born with a mix of both bits
@@alexanderwalker3906 are trans people inter sex? No. So I'm not sure how a defect such as inter sex is backing your argument for trans.
"We don't accept the exceptions because we're are fashies who believe in eugenics" they're not gonna say this out loud tho