SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE SALVAGE YARD VIDEO before you watch! First, thank you all for watching, here's a few things to know on the front end about the salvage yard video. This is my first time filming a Classic Car Yard for the channel, it's a big experiment and I don't claim to know everything perfectly, but I am growing. I usually only chase Rare Muscle Cars on the channel, but filming this yard sounded like fun and I knew some of you would enjoy it. The majority of my expertise is 60s and 70s GM and Ford Muscle Cars. I am not a Cadillac or Mopar expert nor do I know some of the larger Luxury Vehicles extremely well other than 55-57 Chevy's and Impalas. If I make a mistake along the way, help me learn rather than belittling me. There's always room for all of us to learn together. And I want too. I want to keep the classic car industry alive and kicking. Being grumpy and prideful only keeps my generation away from the classics and pushes them into the imports. So let's be cool and help each other. "You may not want to leave an encouraging comment, but it would be cooler if you did" - David Wooderson “Dazed and Confused” Thanks, John
Thanks man! And thanks for watching. If this video does well I have three more classic car salvage yards I can visit and film on the burner! The comment and feedback means a lot.
@@lelandritchie9989 Thank you for watching and for the encouraging comment! I have a lot of fun with these videos. Check out the newest salvage yard video I posted last week.
I think u did pretty well for someone not too familiar with the older stuff, and just getting these cars in front of eyes is a good thing. im sure they got lots of calls. ( im tempted myself, but i have 9 cars ) 😂
Thank you for the encouragement and the kind comment. I too have too many classics already in my yard or a couple of these would come home with me. Thanks again!
@@mikekirkpatrick293 thanks for watching, commenting with the encouragement, and subscribing! Check out my newest video of another classic salvage yard I posted last week.
The HUGE Black Fleetwood Cadillac in the back 40 could have been used by Fleetwood Mac band back in their touring days. It would be interesting to chase down the vin numbers to verify who once owned that Fleetwood limo. I would love to restore that car of all of the cars you've shown The Fleetwood is my fav. Nice tutorial. Not one if us knows everything about cars. Someone once said "when you think you've learned it all someone changes it." I appreciate watch this video from TAMPA BAY FLORIDA USA 💪🇺🇸💪 🏁
@@williamkirkland7002 Thanks for watching and for all the feedback! Your comment was fun to read and think on. I didn’t think about the fleetwood that way.
Everybody wants to see something different. So people say show more cars. Others say that you skipped a good one. Can't please them all. You did fine. Especially for your first time out
@@LostandFoundClassics you might try a posting where you give people choices of what they want to see more of. Just make sure you like all the choices you have. Are you puddin fan? A year or so ago he had a black man on there that he's been friends with for a long time. He's a great guy. Him and I have had some long phone and text conversations. He is a true car guy. You may look them up and see if he can do something with you on your channel. Here comes crossing video very well and he's knowledgeable. I don't know how he would do anything but help you on your channel. I know he's a very busy guy. Oh I know his name I have his phone number and so forth. I'm not going to sit here and tell you how to run your channel or anything. But you might be surprised who has used some of my ideas 💡. What I seeing your channel is promising as long as you stay with it. In I can do something different you know you could approach your salvage yard differently. Probably get the same number of views. It would be a different group of people. There's a couple other guys near you. At least near that salvage yard. Anyway I went ahead and sub to your channel I want to see where you go with it. I am a big big supporter Mr T. I don't often mention it on my channel but I'm very boisterous on other channels that are designed for political and social viewpoints. I was getting thousands of views. I ain't got around 40,000 views on one car in particular. I'm being censored and it can only be because of my political or social conservative beliefs. The lesson here is what's important. I'd say a lot of people in Oklahoma and Texas would support those viewpoints. The trouble is they're not the one in control of their social media we're talking on. I'm very much straight to your point but I'm talking around in a circle so I don't contaminate your channel. Just a heads up. One thing I like to do to get car show junkyard a bunch of them out in the field. I'll pick a few of them and do individual videos while I'm there and follow up with them. Now I don't do anything longer than a few minutes. I live and die on the shorts 🩳. It's about the amount of work I want to put into it. 👍
@@CAROLDDISCOVER-2025 I’m on a trip in Mexico. As soon as I get back in a week I’m going to sit down at my desk and read through this again in details. There’s really good stuff in here. Thank you!
only 2 hours from Stonewall and do some wrenching myself, but you got to have a good platform to resurrect *frame damage *all the glass * okla so the rust is usually minimal * not gonna restore a car unless i love it - that being said of course this is a great video . . . that malibu/chevelle good resto mod candidate
Thanks for the great comment! Be sure to give D&H a call and setup an appointment to swing by when you are ready. Also be sure to like their facebook page, they pick up cars all the time and post prices so there may be something you are after that gets put on their page.
Convertible Dakota was NOT a factory assembly line truck. Select truck optioned trucks were sent factory secondary assembler company. Excellent example is Ford and Ford Shelby.
Thank you for your comments. Let's dive deeper here because I think the hang up is with my use of the word "Factory" which I'll clarify at the end of my comment here. The Dakota Convertible was only offered in the Sport Model Dakotas. It was considered a "Factory" vehicle by Mopar even though the top was done in partnership with American Sunroof Corporation. Because Dodge commissioned the tops, it is considered a "Factory" option by owners. The contrast here is "Factory" vs "Aftermarket". Aftermarket meaning a non Dodge Recognized option. The Drop Top Dakota Sport is considered "Stock" or "Factory" which are words that can be used interchangeably without harm. This is all I was attempting to explain. Additionally, your example of Ford and Shelby has a bit of a flaw in it. The Shelby Mustang did become a Factory Ford Assembly line car in 1969. Prior to 1969, they were exclusively built at Shelby Motor Company in California. The difference here, Dodge did not add a name to the Dakota or put the American Sunroof Company name on the truck life Shelby did on the Mustangs. Also, because the Shelby option did become an assembly line Mustang Option, it's not apples to apples. Another example is the The Boss 429. It is still considered "factory" even though it was built by Karr Kraft. Therefore the comparison isn't equal. Many companies outsource options that are considered "Factory" or "Stock" if you prefer that word better. Thanks for watching
@kitkrienke9520 While I appreciate your feedback, especially if I was incorrect, you are actually not correct on this one. This car is a 1979 Trans Am. The Honeycomb wheels were offered in 1971-76 Only. The 1977 -1981 Trans Am was offered with the "Snowflake" Wheel. Since this car is a 1979, it has those rather than the Honeycombs. My age doesn't effect the options available in the 70s. But you can buy the snowflake wheels reproduction from many places such as here: www.google.com/search?q=trans+am+snowflake+wheels&sca_esv=06ed8a5a342fa1c5&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS853US853&ei=t3sZZ4bLBuKkkPIP4NK16Ac&ved=0ahUKEwjGgvu_yaWJAxViEkQIHWBpDX0Q4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=trans+am+snowflake+wheels&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiGXRyYW5zIGFtIHNub3dmbGFrZSB3aGVlbHMyCxAAGIAEGJECGIoFMgsQABiABBiRAhiKBTIFEAAYgAQyCxAAGIAEGJECGIoFMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBBAAGB4yBhAAGAUYHjIGEAAYBRgeMgYQABgFGB5IwxBQrgRYyw1wAXgBkAEAmAFLoAG8BKoBATm4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgqgAt8EwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBhAAGAcYHsICCBAAGAcYCBgewgIIEAAYBRgHGB7CAgcQABiABBgNmAMAiAYBkAYFkgcCMTCgB_pK&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#vhid=7Tzk24eGftzxvM&vssid=_wn0ZZ8yYO8jIkPIP6v6QiQY_88
t 35min those two cars are Buick Invictus or Le Sabers 4 door Flat tops... love flat tops which were available on many of the four door GM models for those years like the Oldsmobile at minute 48. Minute 36 those Bullets on the Cadillacs were know as "Dagmar's"... referenced from a Buxom actress of early times... Goggle Dagmar's and you'll see! By the way that Wrecked 2 door Cadillac you showed with the Dagmar's is easily a six figure car in the market because its stupid rare! Minute 52 Karmen Ghia are Poor Man Porsches actually had Porsche Horsepower engines! All the Hudson's 4 doors are Wasps the racing 2 doors were the Hornets and No That was not TUCKER All 50 of them are accounted for Or that would be Number 51 and worth Ten Million Dollars! Lol! I'm an old guy and I appreciate all your legwork and the roving camera report!
Hey, thanks for watching and thank you for all the info! I'm more versed in the Muscle Cars than the 50s and 60s bigger models. I appreciate you taking the time to write all of that out and share it with me. Thanks again! Great having you here with all of that knowledge!
It's not a 58 57 had single tail lights 58 had 2 tail lights on both sides I know this because im 74 years old and been a mechanic for 60 years an d owned and worked on many 57 and 58 ford's that one is a 57
@@thomasputnam4491 I don't mean to argue with you but you are confusing the Fairlane with the Ranchero. The Fairlane had dual taillight starting in 1958 but the Ranchero didn't. The 57 and 58 Ranchero shared the same rear end with single rear lights. It wasn't until 1959 the ranchero had dual taillights. The Fairlane had dual taillight starting in 1958 but the Ranchero didn't. I know for certain because my father owned a 58 Ranchero and I drove it from New Jersey to Arizona once. The moldings on the Ranchero in the video are 1958 and the front of the Ranchero has a 58 Nose. Additionally, the Ranchero in the video has 1958 side moldings which are different than 57 and one year only. You can see what I mean here on Google: www.autoevolution.com/news/hero-saves-rusting-away-1958-ford-ranchero-from-a-field-now-running-and-cruising-227453.html
Thank you, a few others pointed that out as well. My specialty is in 60 and 70s Muscle cars and I'm not as well versed in the larger luxury cars of the 50s and 60s.
In some of my other videos, folks said that I talked too little and that they wanted to hear my thoughts. I enjoyed walking through the yard and commenting on things the best I could. I specialize in Ford and GM mostly 60s and 70s Muscle Cars. Exploring the Yard was stretching for my knowledge and I'm doing my best to learn. Thanks for commenting.
It's a Studebaker.. And I realized that after I said it but forget to correct myself. This is my first time going through a Classic Car yard and filming for the channel, it a big experiment and I don't claim to know everything perfectly, but I am growing. The majority of me expertise is 60s and 70s GM and Ford Muscle Cars. I am not a Cadillac or Mopar expert nor do I know some of the larger Luxury Vehicles extremely well. If I make a mistake along the way, help me learn rather than belittling me. There's always room for all of us to learn together. I want to keep the classic car industry alive and kicking. Being grumpy and prideful only keeps my generation away from the classics and pushes them into the imports. So let's be cool and help each other. "You may not want to leave an encouraging comment, but it would be cooler if you did" - David Wooderson “Dazed and Confused” Thanks, John
The 1957 and 1958 Ranchero have the same rear taillights. It is not the same as the Fairlane which had different rear tail lights. The Ranchero in the video is a 1958. But, I can see how you can confuse them. We all get them wrong sometimes. That's why humility is important so we can all grow and encourage each other to do better.
@@LostandFoundClassics it said 57 DeSoto, 57 and 58 looked a like except the head lights and the trim, but you were close on the year, I would have said 57 too but I seen if it's 57 and 58 side by side and it was just the chrome difference.
@@GlamrockFreddystudios Looks like I made a typo. Good Catch. I created a youtube short about two weeks ago with the car and identify it as a 58 in the text and video. I got those mixed up. You can see that video here: ruclips.net/user/shortsHnVpBYo0D4Q
SOMETHING IMPORTANT TO KNOW ABOUT THE SALVAGE YARD VIDEO before you watch!
First, thank you all for watching, here's a few things to know on the front end about the salvage yard video.
This is my first time filming a Classic Car Yard for the channel, it's a big experiment and I don't claim to know everything perfectly, but I am growing. I usually only chase Rare Muscle Cars on the channel, but filming this yard sounded like fun and I knew some of you would enjoy it.
The majority of my expertise is 60s and 70s GM and Ford Muscle Cars. I am not a Cadillac or Mopar expert nor do I know some of the larger Luxury Vehicles extremely well other than 55-57 Chevy's and Impalas.
If I make a mistake along the way, help me learn rather than belittling me. There's always room for all of us to learn together. And I want too.
I want to keep the classic car industry alive and kicking. Being grumpy and prideful only keeps my generation away from the classics and pushes them into the imports. So let's be cool and help each other.
"You may not want to leave an encouraging comment, but it would be cooler if you did" - David Wooderson “Dazed and Confused”
Thanks,
John
00000
This is the best and most detailed walkthrough of this yard that I have seen
@@CAROLDDISCOVER-2025 🔥🔥
Thank you
@@LostandFoundClassics 👍 you're welcome
Keep the junkyard videos coming with the information good job 👍
Thanks man! And thanks for watching. If this video does well I have three more classic car salvage yards I can visit and film on the burner!
The comment and feedback means a lot.
Thank you I'll be getting in touch with them
Awesome!
First time watching your cool great scrap yard. UK
@@glennhilton4567 Thanks for watching from the UK !!
thanks for a great job,its nice seeing and listening to a man that knows his cars and how to create a ood video
@@lelandritchie9989 Thank you for watching and for the encouraging comment! I have a lot of fun with these videos. Check out the newest salvage yard video I posted last week.
Great job! I enjoyed watching your video
Thanks for watching and leaving an encouraging comment!
I think u did pretty well for someone not too familiar with the older stuff, and just getting these cars in front of eyes is a good thing. im sure they got lots of calls. ( im tempted myself, but i have 9 cars ) 😂
Thank you for the encouragement and the kind comment. I too have too many classics already in my yard or a couple of these would come home with me. Thanks again!
save the chrysler n-y....early video
Place is amazing, so many worth saving
I absolutely agree! Thanks for watching
Thank u. Alot of great stuff
Thanks for watching! It was a blast to explore!
@LostandFoundClassics I'd love to buy 6 of those daddy's lol how they get cars out that r so buried ...
@@keithpage1057 They have a very large Fork Lift on site and can move any of the cars around fairly easily if you want one. Just give them a call!
I enjoyed watching your video
@@danmassie1942 thank you for watching!!
I'm happy to have found your channel. Thanks for the tour of what could be! I subbed after this cool video.
@@mikekirkpatrick293 thanks for watching, commenting with the encouragement, and subscribing!
Check out my newest video of another classic salvage yard I posted last week.
Thanks D& H great yard
They are excellent!
The HUGE Black Fleetwood Cadillac in the back 40 could have been used by Fleetwood Mac band back in their touring days. It would be interesting to chase down the vin numbers to verify who once owned that Fleetwood limo. I would love to restore that car of all of the cars you've shown The Fleetwood is my fav. Nice tutorial. Not one if us knows everything about cars. Someone once said "when you think you've learned it all someone changes it." I appreciate watch this video from TAMPA BAY FLORIDA USA 💪🇺🇸💪 🏁
@@williamkirkland7002 Thanks for watching and for all the feedback! Your comment was fun to read and think on. I didn’t think about the fleetwood that way.
Everybody wants to see something different. So people say show more cars. Others say that you skipped a good one. Can't please them all. You did fine. Especially for your first time out
@@CAROLDDISCOVER-2025 thank you! I feel the same. I really appreciate the encouragement!
@@LostandFoundClassics just keep it up
@@CAROLDDISCOVER-2025 Will Do!!
@@LostandFoundClassics you might try a posting where you give people choices of what they want to see more of. Just make sure you like all the choices you have. Are you puddin fan? A year or so ago he had a black man on there that he's been friends with for a long time. He's a great guy. Him and I have had some long phone and text conversations. He is a true car guy. You may look them up and see if he can do something with you on your channel. Here comes crossing video very well and he's knowledgeable. I don't know how he would do anything but help you on your channel. I know he's a very busy guy. Oh I know his name I have his phone number and so forth. I'm not going to sit here and tell you how to run your channel or anything. But you might be surprised who has used some of my ideas 💡. What I seeing your channel is promising as long as you stay with it. In I can do something different you know you could approach your salvage yard differently. Probably get the same number of views. It would be a different group of people. There's a couple other guys near you. At least near that salvage yard. Anyway I went ahead and sub to your channel I want to see where you go with it. I am a big big supporter Mr T. I don't often mention it on my channel but I'm very boisterous on other channels that are designed for political and social viewpoints. I was getting thousands of views. I ain't got around 40,000 views on one car in particular. I'm being censored and it can only be because of my political or social conservative beliefs. The lesson here is what's important. I'd say a lot of people in Oklahoma and Texas would support those viewpoints. The trouble is they're not the one in control of their social media we're talking on. I'm very much straight to your point but I'm talking around in a circle so I don't contaminate your channel. Just a heads up. One thing I like to do to get car show junkyard a bunch of them out in the field. I'll pick a few of them and do individual videos while I'm there and follow up with them. Now I don't do anything longer than a few minutes. I live and die on the shorts 🩳. It's about the amount of work I want to put into it. 👍
@@CAROLDDISCOVER-2025 I’m on a trip in Mexico. As soon as I get back in a week I’m going to sit down at my desk and read through this again in details. There’s really good stuff in here. Thank you!
1967 was the 1st year for front wheel drive Eldorados, I had a 66.
Nice! Thank you for that info. I didn't know that.
only 2 hours from Stonewall and do some wrenching myself, but you got to have a good platform to resurrect *frame damage *all the glass * okla so the rust is usually minimal * not gonna restore a car unless i love it - that being said of course this is a great video . . . that malibu/chevelle good resto mod candidate
Thanks for the great comment! Be sure to give D&H a call and setup an appointment to swing by when you are ready. Also be sure to like their facebook page, they pick up cars all the time and post prices so there may be something you are after that gets put on their page.
The 57 Chev Bel Air came in 2dr. 4dr and wagon 2 or 4 dr sedan and also 2, 4 dr. ht. yes and wagon.
Awesome finds 🙌🏼
Another peach courier 🍑🚚
30’s Chevy’s, etc. 🔥
Thank you, but I can't take all the credit. I had a great cameraman who did a fantastic job catching it all on film for the channel!
Nice buick 🇺🇲
Agreed!
59 best year buick they made
These classic cars must.look like a 🛸 ufo to all these miliniums since.1960s northern calif 🇺🇲
Sometimes they do! But those fins are beautiful!
The old no post cars where called hard tops young man
Thank you, the term escaped me when I was in the yard but I recall that after several people have pointed it out. I appreciate it!
@@LostandFoundClassicssports coupe as well
I would say low riding impalas made them sought after Tri 5 has always been king
I would absolutely agree.
Convertible Dakota was NOT a factory assembly line truck. Select truck optioned trucks were sent factory secondary assembler company. Excellent example is
Ford and Ford Shelby.
Thank you for your comments. Let's dive deeper here because I think the hang up is with my use of the word "Factory" which I'll clarify at the end of my comment here.
The Dakota Convertible was only offered in the Sport Model Dakotas. It was considered a "Factory" vehicle by Mopar even though the top was done in partnership with American Sunroof Corporation. Because Dodge commissioned the tops, it is considered a "Factory" option by owners. The contrast here is "Factory" vs "Aftermarket". Aftermarket meaning a non Dodge Recognized option. The Drop Top Dakota Sport is considered "Stock" or "Factory" which are words that can be used interchangeably without harm. This is all I was attempting to explain.
Additionally, your example of Ford and Shelby has a bit of a flaw in it. The Shelby Mustang did become a Factory Ford Assembly line car in 1969. Prior to 1969, they were exclusively built at Shelby Motor Company in California.
The difference here, Dodge did not add a name to the Dakota or put the American Sunroof Company name on the truck life Shelby did on the Mustangs. Also, because the Shelby option did become an assembly line Mustang Option, it's not apples to apples. Another example is the The Boss 429. It is still considered "factory" even though it was built by Karr Kraft.
Therefore the comparison isn't equal. Many companies outsource options that are considered "Factory" or "Stock" if you prefer that word better.
Thanks for watching
I had a 1972. Ford courior like the ,"velveta cheese yellow" i bought new after ',nam return. Rust finally got to it after 438,00 miles
They are extremely fun trucks.
On that caddi front wheel drive all you have to do is look in the front floor boards there is no hump
Great tip! Thank you!
Some Mopar guy will grab those '71 Chargers...
Several people have actually called them about the chargers since the video was released a couple days ago.
@@LostandFoundClassics I'm sure..
Non post car = hardtop. Post car = sedan
Yes, I'm aware. Thank you!
The first Buick is a 59 not a 58 like you said. Just to correct you👍But great video
Thanks for commenting. Several folks have pointed that out for me. I appreciate you watching and helping ID the car.
You are right 57 and 58 had the same tail lights I did not know that or remember that sorry
No worries at all! We are all learning together and I didn't take any offense. I appreciate you being here and watching.
A Chevrolet is American and melabu is Canadian
Hey there, thanks for commenting. Unfortunately, that's not true. The Malibu is a model of Chevrolet
Sorry the chicanos mexican americans started with the chevy impala lowriding 🇺🇲
I'm all for a nice lowrider!
Stop! Snowflake wheels ? I believe they were referred to as “Honnycomb”. How old are you anyway? 😂
@kitkrienke9520 While I appreciate your feedback, especially if I was incorrect, you are actually not correct on this one.
This car is a 1979 Trans Am.
The Honeycomb wheels were offered in 1971-76 Only.
The 1977 -1981 Trans Am was offered with the "Snowflake" Wheel.
Since this car is a 1979, it has those rather than the Honeycombs.
My age doesn't effect the options available in the 70s.
But you can buy the snowflake wheels reproduction from many places such as here:
www.google.com/search?q=trans+am+snowflake+wheels&sca_esv=06ed8a5a342fa1c5&rlz=1C1CHBF_enUS853US853&ei=t3sZZ4bLBuKkkPIP4NK16Ac&ved=0ahUKEwjGgvu_yaWJAxViEkQIHWBpDX0Q4dUDCBA&uact=5&oq=trans+am+snowflake+wheels&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiGXRyYW5zIGFtIHNub3dmbGFrZSB3aGVlbHMyCxAAGIAEGJECGIoFMgsQABiABBiRAhiKBTIFEAAYgAQyCxAAGIAEGJECGIoFMgUQABiABDIFEAAYgAQyBBAAGB4yBhAAGAUYHjIGEAAYBRgeMgYQABgFGB5IwxBQrgRYyw1wAXgBkAEAmAFLoAG8BKoBATm4AQPIAQD4AQGYAgqgAt8EwgIKEAAYsAMY1gQYR8ICBhAAGAcYHsICCBAAGAcYCBgewgIIEAAYBRgHGB7CAgcQABiABBgNmAMAiAYBkAYFkgcCMTCgB_pK&sclient=gws-wiz-serp#vhid=7Tzk24eGftzxvM&vssid=_wn0ZZ8yYO8jIkPIP6v6QiQY_88
Id love to have the 1959 Buick 2dr ht..it would be nice to know a price on it .. d
The 1959 Buick Electra at the beginning of the video is $3,800.
You can call D&H Classics at 580-320-1846
Does it have an engine..??🤔
Which one?
You walked right past a 66 Impala without sayin a word about the fact that year was the ONLY one with rectangular tail lights...What's up with that?
Cool fact, I actually didn't know that. I'm not am impala expert. Most of my time is invested in Muscle Cars.
Hard top you mean 🇺🇲
Yes, Hardtop is the correct language.
Definition of "patina" = RUST
Not always, but sometimes
I think you should do it again and stay in the back of the camera .....
Thanks
Show some Chevy 5556 and also 49 in the 40s
Apresentador aparece mais q os carros 🤔🤔
It happens
Dalton Dolla
Buick is a 1959 or 1960.
It's a 1959
65 66.impala 🇺🇲ss
For sure!
That blue chrysler k limo was a factory car
@@markhunka really? That’s wild
Its a road runner
@@peterGriffin-ug7jv thanks for clarifying!
Good lord. Just show us the cars. We don’t need a car by car biography. You could talk the bark off of a tree. 🤦♂️. I can’t watch any more
Thanks for watching!
Is all the broken glass able to easily replace ?.... I don't think so
It depends on which vehicle you are speaking about. Many companies today offer replacement glass for the majority of these.
The first car you featured is a 1959 Buick not a’58
@@wallyrossow3141 thank you, much appreciated. I’ve had several folks help me on that one in the comments. Thanks for watching.
t 35min those two cars are Buick Invictus or Le Sabers 4 door Flat tops... love flat tops which were available on many of the four door GM models for those years like the Oldsmobile at minute 48.
Minute 36 those Bullets on the Cadillacs were know as "Dagmar's"... referenced from a Buxom actress of early times... Goggle Dagmar's and you'll see! By the way that Wrecked 2 door Cadillac you showed with the Dagmar's is easily a six figure car in the market because its stupid rare!
Minute 52 Karmen Ghia are Poor Man Porsches actually had Porsche Horsepower engines!
All the Hudson's 4 doors are Wasps the racing 2 doors were the Hornets and No That was not TUCKER All 50 of them are accounted for Or that would be Number 51 and worth Ten Million Dollars! Lol!
I'm an old guy and I appreciate all your legwork and the roving camera report!
I meant to say if that wrecked Caddy was a two door!!!!!
Hey, thanks for watching and thank you for all the info! I'm more versed in the Muscle Cars than the 50s and 60s bigger models. I appreciate you taking the time to write all of that out and share it with me.
Thanks again! Great having you here with all of that knowledge!
its a 59 Buick
That's a 57 Ranchero
It's actually a 58. The 57 and 58 share the same rear end.
It's not a 58 57 had single tail lights 58 had 2 tail lights on both sides I know this because im 74 years old and been a mechanic for 60 years an d owned and worked on many 57 and 58 ford's that one is a 57
@@thomasputnam4491 I don't mean to argue with you but you are confusing the Fairlane with the Ranchero.
The Fairlane had dual taillight starting in 1958 but the Ranchero didn't.
The 57 and 58 Ranchero shared the same rear end with single rear lights. It wasn't until 1959 the ranchero had dual taillights.
The Fairlane had dual taillight starting in 1958 but the Ranchero didn't. I know for certain because my father owned a 58 Ranchero and I drove it from New Jersey to Arizona once.
The moldings on the Ranchero in the video are 1958 and the front of the Ranchero has a 58 Nose.
Additionally, the Ranchero in the video has 1958 side moldings which are different than 57 and one year only.
You can see what I mean here on Google:
www.autoevolution.com/news/hero-saves-rusting-away-1958-ford-ranchero-from-a-field-now-running-and-cruising-227453.html
Its a ‘59, not a ‘58
Thank you, a few others pointed that out as well. My specialty is in 60 and 70s Muscle cars and I'm not as well versed in the larger luxury cars of the 50s and 60s.
@@PatDemitras All you people should just calm down it's not that critical the people that know it's the same car , different trim
@ Easy, brah, I corrected him on the year of a car, not on how he raises his children. Laugh out loud now and again, it’ll do you good.
I want that charger with the hideaway headlights man how much I'm going to have to call and find out
It's for sale, I think it was around $3,800. Give them a call!
That car was not a business coupe a business coupe didn't have a back seat
You are correct, the better term would be a Humpback Sedan.
I want to no where this place is
All the information is at the end of the video.
That first chevelle was a 69 not a 68.
@@Steve-o-e7g4x I don’t recall saying it was a 68.
Show more cars and give up the talking.
You're pointing out too many things that are wrong.
Thank you for the kind feedback.
Can you find shit in Canada
@@RonBrunt I’ve never tried, But I’m currently finding stuff in Mexico
Your talking too much just tell the year and keep moveing
In some of my other videos, folks said that I talked too little and that they wanted to hear my thoughts. I enjoyed walking through the yard and commenting on things the best I could. I specialize in Ford and GM mostly 60s and 70s Muscle Cars. Exploring the Yard was stretching for my knowledge and I'm doing my best to learn. Thanks for commenting.
NOTHING WORTH EVEN LOOKING AT.
@@rexmasters1541 thanks for watching! Be sure to subscribe for more.
A Tucker? Yea right lmao dude learn your cars BEFORE going to a wrecking yard. 👍
It's a Studebaker.. And I realized that after I said it but forget to correct myself.
This is my first time going through a Classic Car yard and filming for the channel, it a big experiment and I don't claim to know everything perfectly, but I am growing.
The majority of me expertise is 60s and 70s GM and Ford Muscle Cars. I am not a Cadillac or Mopar expert nor do I know some of the larger Luxury Vehicles extremely well. If I make a mistake along the way, help me learn rather than belittling me. There's always room for all of us to learn together.
I want to keep the classic car industry alive and kicking. Being grumpy and prideful only keeps my generation away from the classics and pushes them into the imports. So let's be cool and help each other.
"You may not want to leave an encouraging comment, but it would be cooler if you did" - David Wooderson “Dazed and Confused”
Thanks,
John
First time watching from Australia id like to say that you have a great channel I'm going to subscribe keep up the good work cheers mate
@@cuwwa138 Thank you!
Its a 57 Ford Rang not a 58.
The 1957 and 1958 Ranchero have the same rear taillights.
It is not the same as the Fairlane which had different rear tail lights.
The Ranchero in the video is a 1958.
But, I can see how you can confuse them. We all get them wrong sometimes.
That's why humility is important so we can all grow and encourage each other to do better.
That's a 58 DeSoto
That's what it says on the text where It says "Wrong"
@@LostandFoundClassics it said 57 DeSoto, 57 and 58 looked a like except the head lights and the trim, but you were close on the year, I would have said 57 too but I seen if it's 57 and 58 side by side and it was just the chrome difference.
@@GlamrockFreddystudios Looks like I made a typo. Good Catch. I created a youtube short about two weeks ago with the car and identify it as a 58 in the text and video. I got those mixed up.
You can see that video here: ruclips.net/user/shortsHnVpBYo0D4Q
@@LostandFoundClassics thanks I'll check it out