This is exactly what I was hoping for! I love this Sigma line of lenses and this was the missing focal length for me. Who needs $ when you can have more lenses, right?!?! Lol. Great vid as always Mark.
You've honestly become my go-to guy for camera videos! I'd been waiting for this lens since I started shooting APS-C, it felt like the missing piece in the Sigma trio APS-C lineup. Brilliant review, great to see it used in a studio setting and compared to your G Master lens!
Wow the FX30 is on another level. Such a cinematic picture. So much better than the new vlogging camera. Love Toronto as well. So many things to shoot. Great video.
Perfect review, thank you! Helped me decide. -- One thought came to my mind while watching this: If you are a RUclipsr, you actually may WANT visual changes and movement ESPECIALLY during static talking head scenes. That is when focus breathing while holding up a product may be considered desirable and a plus, somewhat reminiscent of the vertigo effect.
Congrats on posting one of the first reviews on this lens! The focus breathing seems pretty bad, but it still seems terrific for photography. Hoping for a Black Friday deal on this one.
Been waiting nearly 10 years for a quality 23mm for Sony APS-C. Glad it's finally here and looks good, just wish it was a bit smaller. A COMPACT quality 23mm F2 would be amazing and would be a huge seller because of the compact size.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Yea, I just want compact lenses for my compact APS-C bodies, it defeats the purpose not to have great quality compact lenses. You would think it'd be a no brainer and a big seller to even casual shooters. Look at how popular the x100v, xe4 and griii line is. Its all about compact easy to carry
Oh boy. I just switched back to APS-C, and was shooting with the Sony 35 1.8 on my a7C. I picked up the 30 immediately (again) thinking "here I go sitting a mile from the camera again for my talking head", and wow... this happens less than a week later. Another great video Mark.
Love your enthusiasm and humour in the videos, many thanks 🙏 How do you compare this lens to the Zeiss 24mm F1.8 on the aps-c sensor? ...and I think you've already surpassed Nolan's productions in terms of clear and crisp dialogue 😅
Great video Mark! I was thinking of upgrading my lens but I'm on a budget. I currently own the ZV-E10. This price point seems a little too high for me. I'd be using for recording videos of my Kids for RUclips (without a tripod), traveling and taking photos, some portrait photos also. What camera can you recommend? I've been looking at the Sigma 30mm 1.4 but not sure if that is good for video?
Ues - I was thinking that. The Viltrox is a strong contender. not optically quite as great on more areas (and fpdepending on your use case might not make a difference). and it’s cheaper a and has an aperture ring.
Thank you for the honest review Mark! This is a fantastic lens. Pairs nicely with the a6700 for stills and video given the camera’s stabilization. The focal length is just what I was looking for and sold the Sigma 30mm. For walking around and taking pictures of the family this lens is the truth…!
This lens seems to outperform the 24mm GM in every area except build and bokeh. 24mm GM bokeh is as close to perfection as one can achieve. The only complaint one can make against it is the chromatic aberration, and as you've shown, this Sigma seems to have very little or non. For $900 cheaper, it's definitely steal!
Hi dear Mark, your reviews are great I had a few specific questions that may be questions for others: - First of all, the focus problem of this lens may be solved within a year by updating the lens framewear? - Is the problem of barrel distortion that exists in the 16mm model visible and impressive in this lens as well? - Which lens do you recommend (16, 23, 30) for producing RUclips content in a small space with professional decor in a small environment where a large part of the decor is in the image (which minimizes the problem of barrel distortion and on the other hand increases the background decor space in frame)? - Between the 23 and 30 lenses, which lens do you recommend for producing podcast videos and product review videos? with these specifications: + Minimal barrel distortion + The most background space and behind the subject in the frame + Excellent sharpness + Suitable bokeh at a short distance between the subject and the background Thanks buddy 🙏
youre becoming my favourite reviewwer. love the funny presention, but also get a lot from your examples. a lot of apsc coverage but reference to top of the line GM lenses to see if its any compromise. subbing :)
Sounds like a monster. I own the Viltrox 23 and it has the aperture ring and better build. But the sigma looks sharper and the minimum focus distance is better
yeah - that viltrox lens is great and beats the sigma in some ways - especially price. The optical quality of the sigma though is almost perfect thoughout
I am undecided between viltrox 23 and sigma 16mm, and this new lens adds to my problem LOL. Im going to use it mainly In recording youtube videos, talking heads as they said. Nature and events photography is just 2nd. Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.
@@maryaiky well I film a ton of RUclips videos. My talking head is at 35mm full frame on my Fx3 and Viltrox 23mm for my a6600. However the Sigma 16mm is very flexible. Livestreams, talking head, landscape. If I could only have one, I'd get this new Sigma 23 or the Viltrox 23mm. My second purchase would be the Sigma 16mm. This is my personal experience though. I rarely use it
Nice lens!Loved the shots at the intro….pretty artsy! Handheld or added external stab? Great energy Mark…almost want to buy these lenses and then buy a camera to fit! Btw the 23mm made you look more like Chris Hemsworth, but the CDN accent offset.
Great content as usual! I have the Viltrox 23mm 1.4 for my little Dougie. How would you compare it to this new Sigma? Worth the switch in your opinion?
The viltrox is great - it has a nicer build and an aperture ring and less focus breathing. It's not as "optically perfect" but for video - you probably won't see too much of a difference. I would stay with it - I'm getting one in to test it head to head
I just wish it had a m/a switch on it. I think I'm too spoiled with my G Master lenses. The switch would help me go from auto to manual when I'm filming MMA fights when I have to switch to shooting from behind the cage.
Mark, I was ready to pull the trigger and buy the Viltrox PRO 27mm. But you screwed me up again😂. Same price, but Viltrox is heavier and better built (I think without seeing either lens). I want a 35mm equivalent. What is your suggestion for nature photography with the Sony a6700?
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis well I did it!🤣 I’ve been playing around with the Viltrox lens and it is spectacular! Can’t wait to get it out for a serious shoot. Thanks Mark. I’ll give you a shoutout when I share the video. Of course, a big star like you doesn’t need a shoutout from little ole me. 😁
This may be a great lens for the ZV-E1 I know it's not full frame but a little clear image zoom and we are good to go. Did you happen to test that on your a7iv? Cheers thanks for another great video.
I will check about the zoom. I think it’s too tight for vlogging certainly, and I would probably go with the Sony 35 1.8 to make use of the zv-e1’s full frame glory.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thanks. Yeah I was thinking for general filming not vlogging for this beauty. That's a good point about the 35mm f/1.8 but I figured I could get more bang for my buck on my APS-C cameras with this as well as using it on FF.
Mark, great review (as always! ). I am considering getting this lens for my A6700. I have the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 which I think us a great lens, but I like the 1.4 aperture of the 23mm. My question is, with both lenses set to the same focal length, aperture, ISO, shutter speed, etc., would there be a discernable difference in image quality when compared side by side? They both seem to have similar construction with 13 elements in 10 groups. Thanks
Have you considered the Sigma I-Series 24mm f/2? It’s only 35 grams heavier and has an aperture ring and a 9 blade aperture with curved blades. I bought it used for my A7C but going to try it out on the A6700. Sure it’s a stop slower but smaller than Sony’s 24/1.4 GM which I also have. Going to give it a try. Thanks for the video.
Mark, great video... I think I made the mistake of buying a Sony ZV E10 camera with a kit lens. Actually I want to use it for vlog but trust me I didn't like the output quality. I learnt how to operate the camera but still find it hard to get the desired video output. After watching your video I am thinking of buying a prime lens and try again. With your other videos, i have a few sections, pls help me to choose the final one. My expectation here is to shoot the outstanding videos along with the low light performance. Sigma 16 mm 1.4 Sony 15 mm 1.4 Viltorx 13 mm 1.4 Sigma 23 mm 1.4 Viltrox 23 mm 1.4 If I miss this shot then my wife will be super angry and start shooting from the phone itself 😂
Thanks! I also want to create indoor and outdoor daily lifestyle youtube content and I think less aperture 1.4 will certainly help me. In this context i thought of selecting sigma 23 mm 1.4. what's your thoughts? @@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
Good video . Thanks for being so helpful because of u I learned so much about camera ur awesome.. can we see the 85mm stigma lens f1.4 ? If u get a chance to test it out ..
I'm wanting to buy a single lens for my zve10 but I'm in doubt about the sigma 23mm 1.4 and sigma 30mm 1.4. I think I prefer the 30mm focal length especially for portraits. But I read on some forums that the autofocus (AF) of the 23mm 1.4 is much faster and that the image is sharper compared to the 30mm 1.4, as it is a newer lens (2023 compared to the 30mm of 2016). What do you think? Do you notice this big difference in autofocus speed and sharpness?
Mark, when are you gonna start teaching a photography class? I'd totally sign up. Sure it's about 500 miles away from me, but its totally worth the drive.
Now to just offload my Lumix GX85 and lenses now that I've transitioned to a ZV-E10 and get this to go with my 16mm! May even look for another body to have as a B cam on the used market.
Need the Viltrox 23mm vs the new Sigma 23mm now. The Viltrox has been my main lens forever now, and hard to beat at just $280 to me, but would love to see how these stack up against each other Mark.
intoxication sent one - but it’s still in the mail. I think that of it works - there would be better ways to spend $600 than in a focal length that you already have. I tested the Viltrox for the Nikon so I know it’s good. getting a “slightly better” optical performance is likely not worth it for people who already own the Viltrox
that's tough - for video I would do the 16 because I use that the most. But for portraits you have to do the 56. The best all rounder is the 23. But the 30 is great for street photography - I can't choose!!!!
Do you recommend this lens for capturing wedding photos? I already own the 16mm Sigma and I'm considering whether it's worthwhile to have both focal lengths for shooting a wedding.
if you have the 16 - I would opt for the 56mm from Sigma for head and shoulders portraits for weddings. Or at least the Sigma 30mm - because the 23 and 16 are kind of close
Still watching your Videos, Mark. Still loving the Sony ZV-E10. Still not loving police. Still rock my khakis with a cuff and a crease. And I love Sigma lenses and DAMN your channel grows like magic mushrooms.
Sigma always killing it with the value. Can't believe Canon cut off 3rd party lenses lol. I'm still going to rock the 18-50mm 2.8 as my street/travel lens, but this is a solid lens for the price.
I am waiting for Sony to update a6400 and Sigma 16mm will be my first lens choice, with new clear image zoom I will have 16-24mm f1.4 lens which is all I need in my RUclips studio.
the sigma is better optically, but the Viltrox is much cheaper, has a nicer build and aperture and focus breathes a bit less. I prefer having the optical quality of the sigma, but I wouldn’t blame anyone at all for going with the Viltrox - it’s a great lens
Hello What is the best between these lenses to use on a ZV-E10 camera to capture product (sneakers) shots in a 3.6*4.2 meters room? Sigma 23mm of Sigma 16mm
HEY MARK!i love my zve10 withkit lens but i need a zoom lens. i want one wth the greatest amount of zoom while still being budget as i am on lifelong disability benefit so cant work to get extra money and dont want to have to save foe 10 years
I will - but the Viltrox is great. no regrets there. it’s better than the sigma in some ways - especially price. it’s just not as optically perfect in some ways. But that may be in ways that are of no consequence to you
Looks like more quality. Invite in some Camp Koality if you will.... In other news, a Newfoundland Iceberg trip may be happening by someone with a new OM Digital camera that won't include me 🤣Thanks for the affiliate link though! We went with Camera Canada in the end... it arrives Wednesday!
Great video and awesome Sigma put you on the embargo list - are you crazy rich now? :D Jokes aside if you have the lenses a side by side comparison with ZV-E10 + Sigma 23 1.4 vs. A7IV + Sony 35 1.8 would be interesting. My guess is, there won't be much difference :)
To be honest, the Sigma looked better than the GM lens here. Even sharper and cleaner. However, both very good optically. Using this on a ZV-E10, well, that's kind of "strange" because nearly every lens you put on ZV-E10 will be a lot bigger than the camera itself. :D On the other hand, it isn't really easy to get fast apertures on APS-C, making these Sigmas about the only option if you want prime lenses of a certain quality.
Yo Markie Mark, got my Sigma 16mm for the ZVE10 the other day (love it) thanks for making me spend all my hard earned cash on my new camera addiction :p
It will be a different look, less bokeh, but you can get extra reach with clear image zoom without much image quality loss. I probably wouldn’t go all the way to 1.5x though
Great lens for photos as all new sigma lenses, but it breathes a lot, similar to Sigma 56 . Viltrox 23 and 56 have worse IQ especially chromatic aberrations but they breathes less. For video my choice is viltrox and it's significantly cheaper. It's great to have a lot of choice.
they are very different - the 56 is great for portrait photos (head and shoulders shots) the 23 is better for video because it’s a good focal length to shoot video. So if you’re taking photos of people, get the 56 - if you’re shooting video get the 23
![Jack Harlow - Hello Miss Johnson [Official Music Video]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Q86_nlRoIGw/mqdefault.jpg)
The official price is $549 USD. Get it here (affiliate): bhpho.to/40Vfng5
This is exactly what I was hoping for! I love this Sigma line of lenses and this was the missing focal length for me. Who needs $ when you can have more lenses, right?!?! Lol. Great vid as always Mark.
Mark , please do a comparison of this lens and Sigma 16mm of the group. Has this changed your previous praise of the 16mm. I gotsta know!
I'm jealous of how many lenses Sony cameras get. This gives some incredible shots. Great review
It always seemed strange that they had not made this lens before. Looks great.
such a hole in the whole Sony lineup. Viltrox came out with a good one - but not quite as good as this (although cheaper)
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis yah, Viltrox made that lens a while ago, I hope we see an update to it, bring it more in line with the 13mm quality.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisiswhats the viltrox like? worse AF? worse image quality? or both compared to the Sigma?
You've honestly become my go-to guy for camera videos! I'd been waiting for this lens since I started shooting APS-C, it felt like the missing piece in the Sigma trio APS-C lineup. Brilliant review, great to see it used in a studio setting and compared to your G Master lens!
thanks very much!!
Wow the FX30 is on another level. Such a cinematic picture. So much better than the new vlogging camera. Love Toronto as well. So many things to shoot. Great video.
watching this video gives me the happy vibe on why you should enjoy photography, im excited to give this lens a try soon.
Your channel has helped me upgrade my video! Im running a sigma 16mm 1.4 on my zve10. The quality is incredible! Thank you
That is so great to hear!!
Perfect review, thank you! Helped me decide. -- One thought came to my mind while watching this: If you are a RUclipsr, you actually may WANT visual changes and movement ESPECIALLY during static talking head scenes. That is when focus breathing while holding up a product may be considered desirable and a plus, somewhat reminiscent of the vertigo effect.
Congrats on posting one of the first reviews on this lens! The focus breathing seems pretty bad, but it still seems terrific for photography. Hoping for a Black Friday deal on this one.
A quartet deal would probably get 1200+ out of me, and would be such a great budget set of primes
They used to bundle the trio all the time - so hopefully they’ll bundle the works
Been waiting nearly 10 years for a quality 23mm for Sony APS-C. Glad it's finally here and looks good, just wish it was a bit smaller. A COMPACT quality 23mm F2 would be amazing and would be a huge seller because of the compact size.
yes. maybe an I-series type would be great
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Yea, I just want compact lenses for my compact APS-C bodies, it defeats the purpose not to have great quality compact lenses. You would think it'd be a no brainer and a big seller to even casual shooters. Look at how popular the x100v, xe4 and griii line is. Its all about compact easy to carry
Can we see comparison of this lens compared to the sigma 18-50mm at 23mm on the fx30?
and the ZV-E10
Oh boy. I just switched back to APS-C, and was shooting with the Sony 35 1.8 on my a7C. I picked up the 30 immediately (again) thinking "here I go sitting a mile from the camera again for my talking head", and wow... this happens less than a week later. Another great video Mark.
Love your enthusiasm and humour in the videos, many thanks 🙏
How do you compare this lens to the Zeiss 24mm F1.8 on the aps-c sensor?
...and I think you've already surpassed Nolan's productions in terms of clear and crisp dialogue 😅
I would get this for apsc instead of the Zeiss 24
Great video Mark! I was thinking of upgrading my lens but I'm on a budget. I currently own the ZV-E10. This price point seems a little too high for me. I'd be using for recording videos of my Kids for RUclips (without a tripod), traveling and taking photos, some portrait photos also. What camera can you recommend? I've been looking at the Sigma 30mm 1.4 but not sure if that is good for video?
Great review, Mark! Next video to make: Sigma 23mm vs Viltrox 23mm...which I bought on your recommendation ;-)
Ues - I was thinking that. The Viltrox is a strong contender. not optically quite as great on more areas (and fpdepending on your use case might not make a difference). and it’s cheaper a and has an aperture ring.
i'd love that too, I have the viltrox and i'm happy with it
Thank you for the honest review Mark!
This is a fantastic lens. Pairs nicely with the a6700 for stills and video given the camera’s stabilization. The focal length is just what I was looking for and sold the Sigma 30mm. For walking around and taking pictures of the family this lens is the truth…!
This lens seems to outperform the 24mm GM in every area except build and bokeh. 24mm GM bokeh is as close to perfection as one can achieve. The only complaint one can make against it is the chromatic aberration, and as you've shown, this Sigma seems to have very little or non. For $900 cheaper, it's definitely steal!
Yes - if you’re an apsc shooter - it’s as good as it gets at that focal length.
Hi dear Mark, your reviews are great
I had a few specific questions that may be questions for others:
- First of all, the focus problem of this lens may be solved within a year by updating the lens framewear?
- Is the problem of barrel distortion that exists in the 16mm model visible and impressive in this lens as well?
- Which lens do you recommend (16, 23, 30) for producing RUclips content in a small space with professional decor in a small environment where a large part of the decor is in the image (which minimizes the problem of barrel distortion and on the other hand increases the background decor space in frame)?
- Between the 23 and 30 lenses, which lens do you recommend for producing podcast videos and product review videos?
with these specifications:
+ Minimal barrel distortion
+ The most background space and behind the subject in the frame
+ Excellent sharpness
+ Suitable bokeh at a short distance between the subject and the background
Thanks buddy 🙏
I would get the 23 - you'll have to sit too far away from the 30
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
Do you think the focus problem will be solved with an update in the near future ?
Neat-O! Thanks Mark, Walter may be getting a new Sigma hat.
He’ll be the talk of the town.
The focal length I wanted 2 years ago, but now have covered with a zoom. I can't justify the cost, but I still want it!
Price is little high compare to 30mm but 23mm is sweet spot, Since I'm waiting for so long i will definitely buy this lens
Great review Mark 👍
Thanks 👍
5:12 never realised that! But now Now i believe it's ...you! Mr. Nolan!
youre becoming my favourite reviewwer. love the funny presention, but also get a lot from your examples. a lot of apsc coverage but reference to top of the line GM lenses to see if its any compromise. subbing :)
Sounds like a monster. I own the Viltrox 23 and it has the aperture ring and better build. But the sigma looks sharper and the minimum focus distance is better
yeah - that viltrox lens is great and beats the sigma in some ways - especially price. The optical quality of the sigma though is almost perfect thoughout
I am undecided between viltrox 23 and sigma 16mm, and this new lens adds to my problem LOL. Im going to use it mainly In recording youtube videos, talking heads as they said. Nature and events photography is just 2nd.
Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks.
@@maryaiky well I film a ton of RUclips videos. My talking head is at 35mm full frame on my Fx3 and Viltrox 23mm for my a6600. However the Sigma 16mm is very flexible. Livestreams, talking head, landscape. If I could only have one, I'd get this new Sigma 23 or the Viltrox 23mm. My second purchase would be the Sigma 16mm. This is my personal experience though. I rarely use it
@@MarineX wow thanks a lot man for that very valuable advice. 23mm it is.
Nice lens!Loved the shots at the intro….pretty artsy! Handheld or added external stab? Great energy Mark…almost want to buy these lenses and then buy a camera to fit! Btw the 23mm made you look more like Chris Hemsworth, but the CDN accent offset.
Hemsworth - that’s about right. 🤣 The footage at the beginne was with the Zhiyun Crane M3 gimbal
Great content as usual! I have the Viltrox 23mm 1.4 for my little Dougie. How would you compare it to this new Sigma? Worth the switch in your opinion?
The viltrox is great - it has a nicer build and an aperture ring and less focus breathing. It's not as "optically perfect" but for video - you probably won't see too much of a difference. I would stay with it - I'm getting one in to test it head to head
torn between this and 30 1.4 on a6100 - loved the 22mm pancake on efm
I just wish it had a m/a switch on it. I think I'm too spoiled with my G Master lenses.
The switch would help me go from auto to manual when I'm filming MMA fights when I have to switch to shooting from behind the cage.
Great job on the video Mark! Thanks for making it.
Thanks!!
Thanks for the review. It will be the next Sigma to purchase for my ZV-E10!
Wow this lens looks awesome on the FX30!
It is so crazy good
Mark, I was ready to pull the trigger and buy the Viltrox PRO 27mm. But you screwed me up again😂. Same price, but Viltrox is heavier and better built (I think without seeing either lens). I want a 35mm equivalent. What is your suggestion for nature photography with the Sony a6700?
They're both great. But go with your original thought. I think that the Viltrox 27 is probably the best APSC lens around that focal length.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis well I did it!🤣 I’ve been playing around with the Viltrox lens and it is spectacular! Can’t wait to get it out for a serious shoot. Thanks Mark. I’ll give you a shoutout when I share the video. Of course, a big star like you doesn’t need a shoutout from little ole me. 😁
Wow, the sigma trio is now the quarto.
Quatro4Life 🤣
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis LOL yep
This may be a great lens for the ZV-E1 I know it's not full frame but a little clear image zoom and we are good to go. Did you happen to test that on your a7iv? Cheers thanks for another great video.
I will check about the zoom. I think it’s too tight for vlogging certainly, and I would probably go with the Sony 35 1.8 to make use of the zv-e1’s full frame glory.
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thanks. Yeah I was thinking for general filming not vlogging for this beauty. That's a good point about the 35mm f/1.8 but I figured I could get more bang for my buck on my APS-C cameras with this as well as using it on FF.
Hey Mark! Great video. I have one question: when you used the Sigma 23mm f1.4 DC DN like e.g. at 5:22, how far away were you from the camera?
about 5 feet
I’d love to see a comparison between this and my Viltrox 23 1.4
I asked viltrox for one today
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Viltrox is less than half the price. I love mine
Well, that was an easy purchase to make! Thanks for the pre-order! 😊
thanks for thinking of me!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Finally arriving Monday, 4/24/23 & I can't wait for FedEx to show up!
I will be 100% buying and will 100% use your link!
Thanks for thinking of me!!
Mark, great review (as always! ). I am considering getting this lens for my A6700. I have the Sigma 18-50 f/2.8 which I think us a great lens, but I like the 1.4 aperture of the 23mm. My question is, with both lenses set to the same focal length, aperture, ISO, shutter speed, etc., would there be a discernable difference in image quality when compared side by side? They both seem to have similar construction with 13 elements in 10 groups. Thanks
No - you won't notice any real difference if they have the same settings. The 1.4 is the part you'll see the big difference.
@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Thank you
I think Fujifilm has a setting in the menu to set manual focus ring operation to linear. I can't confirm that it'd work with the Sigma though.
Have you considered the Sigma I-Series 24mm f/2? It’s only 35 grams heavier and has an aperture ring and a 9 blade aperture with curved blades. I bought it used for my A7C but going to try it out on the A6700. Sure it’s a stop slower but smaller than Sony’s 24/1.4 GM which I also have. Going to give it a try. Thanks for the video.
Mark, great video...
I think I made the mistake of buying a Sony ZV E10 camera with a kit lens. Actually I want to use it for vlog but trust me I didn't like the output quality. I learnt how to operate the camera but still find it hard to get the desired video output.
After watching your video I am thinking of buying a prime lens and try again. With your other videos, i have a few sections, pls help me to choose the final one.
My expectation here is to shoot the outstanding videos along with the low light performance.
Sigma 16 mm 1.4
Sony 15 mm 1.4
Viltorx 13 mm 1.4
Sigma 23 mm 1.4
Viltrox 23 mm 1.4
If I miss this shot then my wife will be super angry and start shooting from the phone itself 😂
For vlogging I would actually use the Sony 11mm 1.8. Unless you plan to use catalyst browser - then the Viltrox 13 would work too
Thanks! I also want to create indoor and outdoor daily lifestyle youtube content and I think less aperture 1.4 will certainly help me. In this context i thought of selecting sigma 23 mm 1.4. what's your thoughts?
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
Good video . Thanks for being so helpful because of u I learned so much about camera ur awesome.. can we see the 85mm stigma lens f1.4 ? If u get a chance to test it out ..
I sell try to get it in
Nice! I'm going to buy this nice lens for my A6300!
Shockingly good lens
Thank you. Does this lens improve low light performance?
Absolutely- having a 1.4 in lowlight is a huge benefit
Which Sony apsc camera do you recommend for photography? 😅
right now the a6400 is the best bet - but they should be updating it soon hopefully
the new favourite APS-C lens maybe
I'm wanting to buy a single lens for my zve10 but I'm in doubt about the sigma 23mm 1.4 and sigma 30mm 1.4. I think I prefer the 30mm focal length especially for portraits. But I read on some forums that the autofocus (AF) of the 23mm 1.4 is much faster and that the image is sharper compared to the 30mm 1.4, as it is a newer lens (2023 compared to the 30mm of 2016). What do you think? Do you notice this big difference in autofocus speed and sharpness?
I have the same doubts and I find it weird that nobody compared these 2 lenses yet.
Mark, when are you gonna start teaching a photography class? I'd totally sign up. Sure it's about 500 miles away from me, but its totally worth the drive.
you’ll be the first to know 🤣
Now to just offload my Lumix GX85 and lenses now that I've transitioned to a ZV-E10 and get this to go with my 16mm! May even look for another body to have as a B cam on the used market.
Need the Viltrox 23mm vs the new Sigma 23mm now. The Viltrox has been my main lens forever now, and hard to beat at just $280 to me, but would love to see how these stack up against each other Mark.
intoxication sent one - but it’s still in the mail. I think that of it works - there would be better ways to spend $600 than in a focal length that you already have. I tested the Viltrox for the Nikon so I know it’s good. getting a “slightly better” optical performance is likely not worth it for people who already own the Viltrox
Should I buy this or the sigma 18-50 I cant decide! 😭
18-50 for general purpose photography. the 23 if you want a lens for the studio or interviews
When is this lens going to be released for Fuji ? I want it now!
Ha - yes - it’s a banger as the kids say
Mark, at this point, if you could only pick just one lens amongst the sigma quartet now, which one would it be?
that's tough - for video I would do the 16 because I use that the most. But for portraits you have to do the 56. The best all rounder is the 23. But the 30 is great for street photography - I can't choose!!!!
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis LMAO OMG! That’s not helpful at all Mark. I will have to get the whole set 😂… Thank you, I appreciate it.
Holy crap, you really do look like Christopher Nolan! How does this lens stack up to the Sony/Zeiss 24 f1.8 for APS-C?
Do you recommend this lens for capturing wedding photos? I already own the 16mm Sigma and I'm considering whether it's worthwhile to have both focal lengths for shooting a wedding.
if you have the 16 - I would opt for the 56mm from Sigma for head and shoulders portraits for weddings. Or at least the Sigma 30mm - because the 23 and 16 are kind of close
Amazing lens! Really impressed. You really do look like Chris Nolan, with NSYNC hair
I love the 56mm. Got amazing footage from it in video
Hey Mark! I do a bit of recording myself in the gym. What lens focal length would you recommend for that?
probably the Sony 11 so you can get a wide shot while the camera is close to you
I think you make a good double for Sam Neill. BTW, one can have a complete camera setup with the APS-C for the price of a Sony Alpha 1.
no doubt!! I’ll take a Sam Neil
Your sense of humor is out of processing for all brains!
Yeah was waiting for this one for little Dougie!
Still watching your Videos, Mark. Still loving the Sony ZV-E10. Still not loving police. Still rock my khakis with a cuff and a crease. And I love Sigma lenses and DAMN your channel grows like magic mushrooms.
🤣
Awesome lenses i went with the 30mm F1.4 on the zv e10.. I find the fhd 60fps quality is soft is this just sony or perhaps partially the lens?
the 1080 on the zv-e10 is soft. The lens is very sharp, but unfortunately the cameras 1080 I s not
Was the intro shot with S&Q mode?
Openheimer is going to be awesome, thank you!
That's my side gig
I havent even watched this video yet and I already like it.
This makes you a good person.
Sigma always killing it with the value. Can't believe Canon cut off 3rd party lenses lol.
I'm still going to rock the 18-50mm 2.8 as my street/travel lens, but this is a solid lens for the price.
That 18-50 is probably the perfect travel lens on the planet
Right now the price is 499$ for 18-50 & 23 mm. In your opinion, which one is better for Kids Portraits.@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
Have you tried it on full frame with Clear Image Zoom to resolve the crop/vignette..? I’m wondering what effective focal length you get.
What's the name of the music/ artist name of the music that is played at the beginning ?
Can you send me the source link ?
I am waiting for Sony to update a6400 and Sigma 16mm will be my first lens choice, with new clear image zoom I will have 16-24mm f1.4 lens which is all I need in my RUclips studio.
How does this lens compare with the Sony lens for the ZV-E10? I need a low light lens
this is about as good as it gets for lowlight. 1.4 is extremely bright
I was about to buy a viltrox.. what would you pick: viltrox 23mm 1.4 or sigma 23mm 1.4?
the sigma is better optically, but the Viltrox is much cheaper, has a nicer build and aperture and focus breathes a bit less. I prefer having the optical quality of the sigma, but I wouldn’t blame anyone at all for going with the Viltrox - it’s a great lens
It may be diffrent question .Do we stil need lens with image stabilization even if we put camera on DJI RS3 Mini gimbal ?
Counting out Zv e10 .
Cheers
you can turn off all stabilization if you have a gimbal - it's often the best thing to do
Damn you, Mark! I have been set on a Sigma 18-50, but now I’m second guessing myself 😂🫣
welcome to the second guessing club!!
Hello
What is the best between these lenses to use on a ZV-E10 camera to capture product (sneakers) shots in a 3.6*4.2 meters room? Sigma 23mm of Sigma 16mm
Hello. if I have a sigma 16mm and 30mm do you recommend to buy 23mm?)
Not really - unless you find you definitely need something in between. You’d probably be better off getting the 56 to take good portraits
Dude you look like that frickin BABE OF A GORGEOUS STUD Mark Bennett at the 35mm focal length.
I KNEW this would fix it!!
HEY MARK!i love my zve10 withkit lens but i need a zoom lens. i want one wth the greatest amount of zoom while still being budget as i am on lifelong disability benefit so cant work to get extra money and dont want to have to save foe 10 years
look at the tamron 18-300 - huge range amzn.to/3GenRHa
Oh Wow, they already sent it to you for review? I am too late as always :-) Nice review as always.
Please make a comparison against the Viltrox 23mm and don't make me cry, that I bought the Viltrox 23mm a few weeks ago.^^
I will - but the Viltrox is great. no regrets there. it’s better than the sigma in some ways - especially price. it’s just not as optically perfect in some ways. But that may be in ways that are of no consequence to you
Looks like more quality. Invite in some Camp Koality if you will....
In other news, a Newfoundland Iceberg trip may be happening by someone with a new OM Digital camera that won't include me 🤣Thanks for the affiliate link though! We went with Camera Canada in the end... it arrives Wednesday!
sounds exciting - oh the shots!! thanks for using the affiliate link!!
Great video and awesome Sigma put you on the embargo list - are you crazy rich now? :D
Jokes aside if you have the lenses a side by side comparison with ZV-E10 + Sigma 23 1.4 vs. A7IV + Sony 35 1.8 would be interesting. My guess is, there won't be much difference :)
That’s a good idea.
Will try this lens soon
it is a beauty
Ooh viltrox has a 23 1.4 now too, face off? 🤔
To be honest, the Sigma looked better than the GM lens here. Even sharper and cleaner. However, both very good optically.
Using this on a ZV-E10, well, that's kind of "strange" because nearly every lens you put on ZV-E10 will be a lot bigger than the camera itself. :D On the other hand, it isn't really easy to get fast apertures on APS-C, making these Sigmas about the only option if you want prime lenses of a certain quality.
Yo, let's help Mark out by hitting the LIKE button, it's free and takes a second.
I don't know about Chris Nolan, but you are definitely a doppelganger from Ben McKenzie 😂
I prefer this
Is it good for sony zv e10 i am a content creator and i am also a portrait photographer is it good choice for me
for portraits - look at the sigma 56mm 1.4. For video content and street photography the 23mm is good
Yo Markie Mark, got my Sigma 16mm for the ZVE10 the other day (love it) thanks for making me spend all my hard earned cash on my new camera addiction :p
Someone had to join me in the addiction 🤣
This sigma 23mm in vertical shoot how far from the camera we can shoot ?
about 6 feet (1.8 meters)
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisisand sigma 30mm apsc ?
If I clear image zoom my sigma 16, that'll give me 36mm and i save $550 + tax. Win? Or won't look as good?
It will be a different look, less bokeh, but you can get extra reach with clear image zoom without much image quality loss. I probably wouldn’t go all the way to 1.5x though
@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis Ah man lol. Trying to save myself from spending more money on top of already wanting to buy the a6700 😂
so if I had to pick one lens that covers almost everything what would that be? researching the zv-e10 or Fx30
Probably the Tamron 17-70 2.8 amzn.to/3Ues5V4
How is the AF during video with this lens? I heard third party af lens don't work too well with Sony's face registration
it’s perfect. the sigma’s work as well with autofocus as any native Sony lens in all of my tests
Great lens for photos as all new sigma lenses, but it breathes a lot, similar to Sigma 56 . Viltrox 23 and 56 have worse IQ especially chromatic aberrations but they breathes less. For video my choice is viltrox and it's significantly cheaper. It's great to have a lot of choice.
makes sense to me
Your videos are too good. What a goober ! 😂
🤣
Sigma 23mm vs sigma 56mm??
Which is better and why??
they are very different - the 56 is great for portrait photos (head and shoulders shots) the 23 is better for video because it’s a good focal length to shoot video. So if you’re taking photos of people, get the 56 - if you’re shooting video get the 23
Thank You
For your kind reply, I need it for portrait photo.
Will it be good with Sony zv e10?
it will be excellent. Very professional pics with the zv-e10 and the Sigma 56mm. you’ll be happy
Thank you for guiding meh.
Can you compare with viltrox 23mm f1.4
I will be trying to get it in yes
Help me please! Which one should i get 30mm or 23mm most of the time i shoot car vid, thank youuu
The 23
Very good. Immediately in the cart.
has to be!!